Juul Supplemental Memo

MEMORANDUM
July 25, 2019
To: Democratic Members of the Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy
Fr: Committee Staff
Re: Supplemental Memo for Hearing on “Examining JUUL’s Role in the Youth
Nicotine Epidemic: Parts I & II”
The Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy conducted a months-long

investigation of JUUL and determined that the company deliberately targeted children in order to
become the nation’s largest seller of e-cigarettes.
The Subcommittee found that: (1) JUUL deployed a sophisticated program to enter
schools and convey its messaging directly to teenage children; (2) JUUL also targeted teenagers
and children, as young as eight years old, in summer camps and public out-of-school programs;
and (3) JUUL recruited thousands of online “influencers” to market to teens.
The Subcommittee’s findings are based on approximately 55,000 non-public documents

that the company produced to the Subcommittee and the Massachusetts Attorney General.
I. JUUL Recruited Schools to Permit Direct Marketing to Kids

JUUL operated a division, referred to internally as “Youth Prevention and Education.”
This group recruited schools into a program through which JUUL presented its programing to
students. On Wednesday, July 24, 2019, Parents Against Vaping E-cigarettes testified to the
content of one such presentation in school. No parents or teachers were in the room, and JUUL’s
messaging was that the product was “totally safe.” The presenter even demonstrated to the kids
how to use a JUUL.
The schools received payment for these services.1 JUUL paid schools at least $10,000
for access to students in three settings: (1) on school time, either in class or in administrative
periods, (2) in summer school, “in the regular summer classroom setting,” and (3) in a “Saturday
1
Memorandum on JUUL Prevention, Intervention, & Replacement Initiatives (Dec. 15, 2017) (online at
https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/JLI-HOR-00015397.pdf).
School Program.”2 The Saturday School Program was an alternative to “traditional discipline”
for children caught using e-cigarettes in school. In addition to the “JUUL sponsored
curriculum,” JUUL also provided the children snacks. JUUL established the right to collect
student information from the sessions.
In adopting this in-school marketing program, JUUL’s “efforts seemed to duplicate” the
“youth education” programs formerly used by traditional cigarette makers. In one document, on
May 18, 2018, Chief Administrative Officer, Ashley Gould sent an email stating “[h]ere is the
paper that ended the Think Don’t Smoke campaign undertaken by Philip Morris.”3 Youth
Prevention and Education Director, Julie Henderson also met with former members of Philip
Morris’ “youth education” team.4 JUUL’s “Youth Prevention” team even acknowledged the
similarity between their programming and that of “Big Tobacco”5:
2
Invoice from Agua Fria Union High School District No. 216 to JUUL Labs Inc., and Memorandum of
Understanding between Agua Fria Union High School District No. 216, and JUUL Labs Inc. (June 26, 2018) (online
at https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/JLI-HOR-00002035.pdf).
3
E-mail from Ashley Gould, Chief Administrative Officer, JUUL Labs, Inc., to Kristofer Maass and
Markian Sawczuk (May 18, 2018) (online at
https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/JLI-HOR-00015307_Redacted.pdf).
4
E-mail from Julie Henderson, Youth Prevention and Education Director, JUUL Labs, Inc., to Julie
Henderson, Youth Prevention and Education Director, JUUL Labs, Inc. (May 23, 2018) (online at
5
E-mails between Julie Henderson, Youth Prevention and Education Director, JUUL Labs, Inc., Bruce
Harter, and Wendell Greer (Apr. 16–17, 2018) (online at
2
3
II. JUUL Targeted Youth Outside of Schools
JUUL also targeted teenagers by buying access to them at public out-of-school programs.
In one example, JUUL paid $89,000 to the Richmond, California Police Activities
League to allow it to install its programming for a diversion program targeting “youth, aged 12-
17, who face suspension from school for using e-cigarettes….”6 In exchange for JUUL’s
investment, “[a]ll youth will participate in the JUUL labs developed program, Moving Beyond,”
some for as long as ten weeks.
6
Proposal to JUUL Labs for Funding the Richmond Diversion Program, Richmond Police Athletics
League (May 4, 2018) (online at https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/JLI-HOR-
00002180.pdf).
4
JUUL paid $134,000 to set up a 5-week summer camp for 80 children through a charter
school. Participants in the summer camp were “recruited from grades 3 through 12….” JUUL
7
would provide the programming for a “holistic health education program,” helping “student-
participants create a personal ‘healthy lifestyle plan’… engaging low-income youth at risk of
making poor health decisions.” JUUL committed $76,000 to hire the 18 people to run the
program.
In deploying this out-of-school program, JUUL was aware that its programs were “eerily
similar” to those used by large cigarette makers, and even internal executives raised concerns
about their work in schools:8
7
E-mail from Julie Henderson, Youth Prevention and Education Director, JUUL Labs Inc., to Julie
Henderson, Youth Prevention and Education Director, JUUL Labs, Inc. (June 20, 2018) (online at
https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/JLI-HOR-00002789_Redacted.pdf); Invoice
from the Freedom & Democracy Charter Schools Foundation, to JUUL Labs Inc. (June 21, 2018) (online at
8
E-mails between Julie Henderson, Youth Prevention and Education Director, JUUL Labs, Inc., and Bruce
Harter (June 5–6, 2018) (online at https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/JLI-HOR-
00155718_Redacted.pdf).
5
III. JUUL’s Online Influencer Program
JUUL has used a sophisticated and high-cost “influencer” program to promote online
marketing to youth.
According to documents obtained by the Subcommittee, on March 2, 2015, JUUL hired

Grit Creative Group, to “curate and identify 280 influencers in LA/NY to seed JUUL product to
over the course of 3 months.”9 A second contract with Grit, executed on July 27, 2015, paid Grit
to secure “social media buzzmakers with a minimum of 30,000 followers,” to attend launch
events and to develop “influencer engagement efforts to establish a network of creatives to
leverage as loyalists for JUUL.”10
By May 6, 2015, JUUL’s influencer targets were higher11:
JUUL analyzed the JUULvapor.com email subscriber list to identify additional

influencers and found 28,751 influencers on its email list.12
9
Scope of Work Agreement between PAX Labs, Inc., and Grit Creative Group (Mar. 2, 2015) (online at
10
Scope of Work Agreement between PAX Labs, Inc., and Grit Creative Group (July 27, 2015) (online at
11
E-mail from Kate Morgan, Field Marketing Manager, JUUL Labs Inc., to Sarah Richardson,
Communications Director, JUUL Labs Inc. (May 6, 2015) (online at
12
Insightpool Research: Identifying Social Media Influencers from Email Subscriber List (Oct. 4, 2018)
(online at https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/JLI-HOR-00169561_Redacted.pdf).
6
An August 4, 2015, JUUL Monthly Marketing Update states that “the Container Tour
will get JUUL into the hands of over 12,500 influencers, subsequently introducing JUUL to over
1.5 million people.”13
Further evidence of the sophistication of the JUUL influencer program:

• A planning document entitled “JUUL Influencer Program”14;
• An email showing that JUUL employee, Jessica Edmondson, held the title
“Influencer Manager”15; and
• An email with the subject line “Re: Influencer Dept. Roundup,”
indicating a devoted Influencer Department within JUUL.16
Staff contact: Rich Trumka Jr. and Will Cunningham at (202) 225-5051.
13
E-mail regarding Team MKTG (Aug. 4, 2015) (online at
14
Memorandum on JUUL Influencer Program (online at
15
E-mails between Jessica Edmondson, Influencer Manager, JUUL Labs Inc., and Influencer (Dec. 4–5,
2017) (online at https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/JLI-HOR-
16
E-mails between Jessica Edmondson, Influencer Manager, JUUL Labs Inc., and Staff (May 22–23, 29,
2018) (online at https://oversight.house.gov/sites/democrats.oversight.house.gov/files/JLI-HOR-

Juul Supplemental Memo

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Juul Supplemental Memo

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Juul Supplemental Memo

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MEMORANDUM

July 25, 2019

To: Democratic Members of the Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy

Fr: Committee Staff

The Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy conducted a months-long

The Subcommittee’s findings are based on approximately 55,000 non-public documents

I. JUUL Recruited Schools to Permit Direct Marketing to Kids

According to documents obtained by the Subcommittee, on March 2, 2015, JUUL hired

By May 6, 2015, JUUL’s influencer targets were higher11:

JUUL analyzed the JUULvapor.com email subscriber list to identify additional

Further evidence of the sophistication of the JUUL influencer program:

You might also like