Department of Education

Region X - Northern Mindanao

Division of Malaybalay City
District VII
LUYUNGAN HIGH SCHOOL
Nasuli, Bangcud Malaybalay City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) TEACHER I-III (Proficient Teacher)
Name of Ratee : ROSA T.DAGAANG Name of Rater: EDSEL JAMES R.QUEMADO
Position: SST - I Position: School Head
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: LUYUNGAN HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: Octover 2020
Rating Period: SY 2019 - 2020
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA Results

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge on Showed knowledge of content Showed knowledge of content Showed knowledge of content Showed knowledge of content No acceptable evidence was
Education Knowledge and content within and across and its integration within and and its integration within and and its integration within and and its integration within and shown
Services Pedagogy curriculum teaching areas. across subject areas shown in across subject areas shown in across subject areas shown in across subject areas shown in
MOV 1 with a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating of 4
Quality

Year - round 7.50% 4 4 3 3.5

Submitted at least 4 lessons Submitted at least 3 lessons Submitted at least 2 lessons Submitted at least 1 lessons No acceptable evidence was
using MOV 1 and supported by using MOV 1 and supported by using MOV 1 and supported by using MOV 1 and supported by shown
any 1 of the other given MOV. any 1 of the other given MOV. any 1 of the other given MOV. any 1 of the other given MOV.
Efficiency

Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA Results

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 2. Used a range of Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different Facilitated using different No acceptable evidence was
Education teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that teaching strategies that shown
Services enhance learner promote reading, writing and/or promote reading, writing and/or promote reading, writing and/or promote reading, writing and/or
achievement in literacy numeracy skills as shown in numeracy skills as shown in numeracy skills as shown in numeracy skills as shown in
and numeracy skills. MOV 1 with a rating of 7. MOV 1 with a rating of 6. MOV 1 with a rating of 5. MOV 1 with a rating of 4.
Quality

7.50% 4 4 3 3.5
Submitted at least 4 learner- Submitted at least 3 learner- Submitted at least 2 learner- Submitted at least 1 learner- No acceptable evidence was
centered lessons as evidently centered lessons as evidently centered lessons as evidently centered lesson as evidently shown
shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other
Efficiency MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV given

Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a range of Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching Used different teaching No acceptable evidence was
Education teaching strategies to strategies that develop critical strategies that develop critical strategies that develop critical strategies that develop critical shown
Services develop critical and and creative thinking and/or and creative thinking and/or and creative thinking and/or and creative thinking and/or
creative thinking, as well other HOTS as shown in MOV other HOTS as shown in MOV other HOTS as shown in MOV other HOTS as shown in MOV
as other higher – order Quality 1 with a rating of 7. 1 with a rating of 6. 1 with a rating of 5. 1 with a rating of 4.
thinking skills.

3 4 2 3
Submitted at least 4 lessons Submitted at least 3 lessons Submitted at least 2 lessons Submitted at least 1 lessons No acceptable evidence was
as evidenced by MOV 1 and as evidenced by MOV 1 and as evidenced by MOV 1 and as evidenced by MOV 1 and shown
supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other
Efficiency given MOV. given MOV. given MOV. given MOV.

7.50% Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA Results

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom Used classroom management Used classroom management Used classroom management Used classroom management No acceptable evidence was
Education Environment and structure to engage strategies that engage leaners strategies that engage leaners strategies that engage leaners strategies that engage leaners shown
Services Diversity of learners, individually or in in activities/tasks as shown in in activities/tasks as shown in in activities/tasks as shown in in activities/tasks as shown in
Learners groups, in meaningful MOV 1 with a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating of 4
exploration, discovery and Quality
hands – on activities within
a range of physical
learning environments.
3 4 2 3
Submitted at least 4 lessons Submitted at least 3 lessons Submitted at least 2 lessons Submitted at least 1 lesson No acceptable evidence was
supported by MOV 1 and any 1 supported by MOV 1 and any 1 supported by MOV 1 and any 1 supported by MOV 1 and any 1 shown
Efficiency of the other acceptable MOV. of the other acceptable MOV of the other acceptable MOV of the other acceptable MOV

Timeliness
7.50%
Basic 5. Manage learner Applied teacher management Applied teacher management Applied teacher management Applied teacher management No acceptable evidence was
Education behavior constructively by strategies of learner behavior strategies of learner behavior strategies of learner behavior strategies of learner behavior shown
Services applying positive and non- that promote positive and non- that promote positive and non- that promote positive and non- that promote positive and non-
violent discipline to ensure violent discipline as shown in violent discipline as shown in violent discipline as shown in violent discipline as shown in
learning – focused MOV 1 with a rating of 7. MOV 1 with a rating of 6. MOV 1 with a rating of 5. MOV 1 with a rating of 4.
environments. Quality

3 4 2 3

Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 4 of the submitted any 1 of the given No acceptable evidence was
given strategies as observed in given strategies as observed in given strategies as observed in strategies as observed in only shown
Efficiency at least 4 lessons. at least 3 lessons. at least 2 lessons. 1 lesson.

7.50% Timeliness
Basic 6. Used differentiated, Applied differentiated teaching Applied differentiated teaching Applied differentiated teaching Applied differentiated teaching No acceptable evidence was
Education developmentally strategies to address learner strategies to address learner strategies to address learner strategies to address learner shown
Services appropriate learning Quality diversity as shown in MOV 1 diversity as shown in MOV 1 diversity as shown in MOV 1 diversity as shown in MOV 1
experiences to address with a rating of 7. with a rating of 6. with a rating of 5. with a rating of 4.
learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and
experiences.

4 4 2 3

7.50%
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Basic 6. Used differentiated,
Weight Actual Rating
Education
MFOs KRAs developmentally
OBJECTIVES Timeline QET
per KRA Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
Services appropriate learning
experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs, (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave
strengths, interests and Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable evidence was
experiences. differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching strategy shown
strategies in at least 2 lessons strategies in at least 2 lessons strategies in at least 2 lessons in at least 1 lesson as
as evidenced by MOV 1 and as evidenced by MOV 1 and as evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and 4 4 2 3
supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other
Efficiency acceptable MOV. acceptable MOV. acceptable MOV. acceptable MOV.

7.50% Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum and 7. Planned, managed Planned implemented Planned implemented Planned implemented Planned implemented No acceptable evidence was
Education Planning and implemented developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced shown
Services developmentally teaching and learning process teaching and learning process teaching and learning process teaching and learning process
sequenced teaching and as shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in MOV 1 with a
learning processes to rating of 7. rating of 6. rating of 5. rating of 4.
meet curriculum
requirements and varied
teaching contexts. Quality

Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable evidence was
developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced shown
teaching and learning process teaching and learning process teaching and learning process teaching and learning process
4 5 2 3.5
as evidently shown in MOV 1 as evidently shown in MOV 1 as evidently shown in MOV 1 as evidently shown in MOV 1
and supported by any 1 of the and supported by any 1 of the and supported by any 1 of the and supported by any 1 of the
other given MOV. other given MOV. other given MOV. other given MOV.

Efficiency

7.50%
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA Results

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

7.50% Timeliness
Basic 8. Participated in Consistently participated in Frequently participated in Occasionally participated in Rarely participated in LAC/ No acceptable evidence was
Education collegial discussions that LACs/ FGDs/ meetings to LACs/ FGDs/ meetings to LACs/ FGDs/ meetings to FGD/ meeting to discuss shown
Services use teacher and learner discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner discuss teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to
feedback to enrich Quality feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich enrich instructionas shown in
teaching practice. instructionas shown in the instructionas shown in the instructionas shown in the the MOV submitted.
MOV submitted. MOV submitted. MOV submitted.
4 5 2 2.5
Participated at least 4 Participated in 3 LACs/FGDs/ Participated in 2 LACs/FGDs/ Participated in 1 LACs/FGDs/ No acceptable evidence was
LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meetings as evidently shown meetings as evidently shown meetings as evidently shown shown
Efficiency evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the given MOV. in any 1 of the given MOV. in any 1 of the given MOV.
given MOV.

7.50% Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, developed, Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied No acceptable evidence was
Education organized and used teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning shown
Services appropriate teaching and resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to
learning resources, address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as address learning goals as
including ICT, to address shown in MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with a rating
learning goals. of 7. of 6. of 5. of 4.
Quality

4 3 2 2.5
Submitted at least 4 varied Submitted 3 varied teaching Submitted 2 varied teaching Submitted teaching and No acceptable evidence was
teaching and learning and learning resources, and learning resources, learning resources, including shown
resources, including ICT, as including ICT, as evidently including ICT, as evidently ICT, as evidently shown in any
evidently shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and MOV.
supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the
Efficiency acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

7.50% Timeliness
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA Results

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 4. Assessment and 10. Designed, selected, Designed, selected, organized Designed, selected, organized Designed, selected, organized Designed, selected, organized No acceptable evidence was
Education Reporting organized and used and used diagnostic, formative and used diagnostic, formative and used diagnostic, formative and used diagnostic, formative shown
Services diagnostic, formative and and summative assessment and summative assessment and summative assessment and summative assessment
summative assessment strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with
strategies consistent with curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as
curriculum requirements. shown in MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with a rating
of 7. of 6. of 5. of 4.

Quality

4 4 2 3

Submitted at least 4 varied Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 assessment tools No acceptable evidence was
assessment tools as evidently assessment tools as evidently assessment tools as evidently as evidently shown in any of shown
shown in any 1 of the shown in any 1 of the shown in any 1 of the the acceptable MOV.
Efficiency acceptable MOV. acceptable MOV. acceptable MOV.

7.50% Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Consistently monitored and Frequently monitored and Occasionally monitored and Rarely monitored and No acceptable evidence was
Education evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress evaluated learner progress shown
Services and achievement using and achievement using learner and achievement using learner and achievement using learner and achievement using learner
learner attainment data. Quality attainment data as shown in attainment data as shown in attainment data as shown in attainment data as shown in
MOV Submitted. MOV submitted . MOV submitted. MOV submitted .

Submitted combination of at Submitted combination of 3 of Submitted combination of 2 of Submitted 1 acceptable MOV. No acceptable evidence was 4 4 2 2
least 4 of the acceptable MOV. the acceptable MOV. the acceptable MOV. shown
Efficiency

Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were No acceptable evidence was
distributed across 4 quarters. distributed across 3 quarters. distributed across 2 quarters. distributed across only 1 shown
Timeliness
quarter.
7.50%
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA Results

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 12. Communicated Consistently showed promptl Frequently showed promptl Occasionally showed promptl Rarely showed promptl and No acceptable evidence was
Education promptly and clearly the and clear communication of and clear communication of and clear communication of clear communication of the shown
Services learners’ needs, progress the learners’ needs, progress the learners’ needs, progress the learners’ needs, progress learners’ needs, progress and
and achievement to key and achievement to key and achievement to key and achievement to key achievement to key
stakeholders, including stakeholders, including stakeholders, including stakeholders, including stakeholders, including
parents/guardians. parents/ guardians as shown in parents/ guardians as shown in parents/ guardians as shown in parents/ guardians as shown in
Quality the MOV submitted. the MOV submitted. the MOV submitted. the MOV submitted.

4.0 3 2 1.66667

Submitted a combination of at Submitted a combination of 3 Submitted a combination of 2 Submitted any 1 of the given No acceptable evidence was
least 4 of the acceptable MOV of the acceptable MOV of the acceptable MOV MOV. shown
Efficiency

Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable evidence was
distributed across 4 quarters. distributed across 3 quarters. distributed across 2 quarters. completed in only I quarter. shown
Timeliness
7.50%
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Weight Actual Rating

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES Timeline QET Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
per KRA Results

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T Ave

Basic 13. Performed various Cosistently erformed various Frequently erformed various Occasionally erformed various Rarely performed various No acceptable evidence was
Education related works/activities related work/activities that related work/activities that related work/activities that related work/activities that shown
Services that contribute to the contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching
teaching – learning learning process as shown in learning process as shown in learning process as shown in learning process as shown in
process. the MOV submitted. the MOV submitted. the MOV submitted. the MOV submitted.
Quality

5. Plus Factor 1.5 3 2 2.5

Submitted at least 4 different Submitted at least 3 different Submitted at least 2 different Submitted any 1 of the No acceptable evidence was
kinds of acceptable MOV. kinds of acceptable MOV. kinds of acceptable MOV. acceptable MOV. shown
Efficiency

10% Timeliness

RATING FOR OVERALL

ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Very Satisfactory

EDSEL JAMES R. QUEMADO ROSA T.DAGAANG ROMEO T. VALDEZ

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

Adjectival Rating Scale

Outstanding 4.500 - 5.000
Very Satisfactory 3.500 - 4.499
Satisfactory 2.500 - 3.499
Unsatisfactory 1.500 - 2.499
Poor 1.000 - 1.499
UATION

Score

0.300
Score

0.300

0.225
Score

0.225

0.225

0.3
Score

0.3

0.300
Score

0.3

0.300
Score

0.300

0.300
Score

0.300
Score

0.150

3.525
 Department of Education
Region X - Northern Mindanao
Division of Malaybalay City
BANGCUD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Bangcud, Malaybalay City

RESULT-BASED PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RPMS) FOR TEAC

FOR PROFICIENT TEACHERS (TI/TII/TIII)
Name of Teacher:
COT 1 COT 2 COT 3 COT 4
COT Indicator
No. COT RPMS 5- COT RPMS 5- COT RPMS 5- COT RPMS 5-
Rating pt Scale Rating pt Scale Rating pt Scale Rating pt Scale
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I)
1 6 4 5 3 3 1 2 0
2 7 5 7 5 0 0
3 7 5 7 5 0 0
4 6 4 6 4 0 0
5 5 3 7 5 0 0
6 6 4 6 4 0 0
7 7 5 7 5 0 0
8 7 5 6 4 0 0
9 7 5 6 4 0 0

ENCODE YOUR COT RATINGS IN FOR COLUMNS (C), (E), (G), and (I), USE
COLUMNS (B), (D), (F), and (H) THE TABLE BELOW TO TRANSLATE YOUR
COT RATING TO ITS EQUIVALENT IN THE
RPMS 5-POINT SCALE

COT Rating RPMS 5-pt Scale

7 5
6 4
5 3
4 2
3 1
 ation
indanao
ay City
GH SCHOOL
y City

NT SYSTEM (RPMS) FOR TEACHERS

RS (TI/TII/TIII)
Learning Area:
RPMS-IPCRF
RPMS Rating for QUALITY Objective
No. PROTECTED AREA for RPMS Rating For Quality
(J) (K) (L)
2.667 3 1 4 3 1
5.000 5 2 5 5 0
5.000 5 3 5 5 0
4.000 4 4 4 4 0
4.000 4 5 3 5 0
4.000 4 6 4 4 0
5.000 5 7 5 5 0
4.500 5 9 5 4 0
4.500 5 10 5 4 0

AVERAGE OF USE THE TABLE

BELOW TO OBTAIN
ENTRIES IN YOUR RPMS RATING
COLUMNS (C), (E), FOR QUALITY, THEN
(G), and (I) ENCODE IN IPCRF

RPMS Rating for

Range Quality
4.500-5.000 5
3.500-4.499 4
2.500-3.499 3
1.500-2.499 2
below 1.499 1
A for RPMS Rating For Quality

0 2.6666667
0 5
0 5
0 4
0 4
0 4
0 5
0 4.5
0 4.5
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishment of KRAs and Objectives 3.525 Very Satisfactory

Ratee - Rater Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee: ROSA T.DAGAANG Name of Superior: EDSEL JAMES R. QUEMADO

Signature: Signature:
Date: October 28, 2019 Date: October 28, 2019
 PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Action Plan (Recommended
Strengths Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
Developmental Intervention)
A. Teaching Competencies (PPST)
critical and creative thinking, as well
as other higher-order thinking skill. Objective 3, KRA 1. To apply a range of Applying new learning from attending Year Round Learning and Development Team.
teaching strategies todevelop critical courses/seminars/ workshops/ Learning Supervisors/ School Principal/ Master
Using feedback to try a new approach to Year Round Teachers
an old practice.
Coaching and mentoring. Year Round Local Funds
B. Core Behavioral Competencies
1. Maintains desirable classroom Facilitates learning thruough functional Teacher uses innovative and updated Multi - media and other teaching
Year Round
and innovative teaching strategies teaching strategies in all learning areas at facilities
management.
1.Professional and Ethics Innovation particularly on 1. Coaching and mentoring. 1. Regular coaching and mentoring Local Funds/ MOOE
2. Teamwork conceptualizing ideas and approach in 2. Incorporate in the next in-service 2. In-service training during vacation
develeoping Ims. traing (INSET) the training on (April and May)
3. Service Orientation
conceptualization of innovative and
4. Results Focus indenious IMs.
Ratee: Rater: Approving Authority:

ROSA T.DAGAANG EDSEL JAMES R. QUEMADO NOEL A. TAN NERY

Teacher I School Head SCHOOL DISTRICT UPERVISOR
BACK
urces Needed

evelopment Team.
School Principal/ Master
Teachers
ocal Funds

ia and other teaching

facilities
OOE
 Department of Education
Region X - Nprthern Mindanao
Division of Malaybalay City
District VII
LUYUNGAN HIGH SCHOOL
Nasuli, Bangcud Malaybalay City
SUMMARY OF IPCRF RATING
S.Y. 2019- 2020

This is to certify that ROSA T. DAGAANG has submitted the requirements for the Individual
Performance Commitment and Review Form. The computed rating below is certified true and correct.

Weight ACTUAL RESULT

MFO KRA Objective RATING
Per KRA Q E T AVE
1. Applied knowledge on content within and
across curriculum teaching areas. 7.5% 4 3 0 3.50 3.50

2. Used a range of teaching strategies that

enhance learner achievement in literacy and 7.5% 4 3 0 3.50 3.50
Content numeracy skills.
Knowledge and
Pedagogy 3. Applied a range of teaching strategies
to develop critical and creative thinking, as
well as other higher – order thinking skills. 7.5% 4 2 0 3.00 3.00

22.5% 12 8 0 10.00 10.00

4. Managed classroom structure to
engage learners, individually or in groups, in
meaningful exploration, discovery and
hands – on activities within a range of 7.5% 4 2 0 2.00 2.00
physical learning environments.

2. Learning 5. Manage learner behavior constructively

Environment and by applying positive and non-violent
Diversity of 7.5% 4 2 0 2.00 2.00
Learners discipline to ensure learning – focused
environments.

6. Used differentiated, developmentally

appropriate learning experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests 7.5% 4 2 0 2.00 2.00
and experiences.

22.5% 0 6 0 3 6
7. Planned, managed and implemented
BASIC developmentally sequenced teaching and
EDUCATION learning processes to meet curriculum
SERVICES 3. Curriculum requirements and varied teaching contexts. 7.5% 5 2 0 2.00 2.00
and Planning

8. Participated in collegial discussions that

use teacher and learner feedback to enrich 7.5% 5 2 4 3.50 3.50
teaching practice.
 Weight ACTUAL RESULT
MFO KRA Objective RATING
Per KRA Q E T AVE
9. Selected, developed, organized and
used appropriate teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to address 7.5% 3 2 0 2.50 2.50
learning goals.

22.5% 8 6 4 7 8
10. Designed, selected, organized and
used diagnostic, formative and summative
assessment strategies consistent with 7.5% 4 2 0 3.00 3.00
curriculum requirements.

11. Monitored and evaluated learner

4. Assessment progress and achievement using learner
and Reporting 7.5% 4 2 0 2.00 2.00
attainment data.
12. Communicated promptly and clearly the
learners’ needs, progress and achievement
to key stakeholders, including 7.5% 3 2 0 1.67 1.67
parents/guardians.

22.5% 11 6 0 6 7
13. Performed various related
5. Plus Factor works/activities that contribute to the 10% 3 2 0 2.50 2.50
teaching – learning process.

100% 3 2 0 2.50 2.50

To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned Overall Rating for Accomplishments
Adjectival Rating Very Satisfactory

Rater: Ratee:
ROMEO T.VALDEZ EDSEL JAMES R. QUEMADO
Secondary School Principal II School Head

Approved:
NOEL A. TAN NERY
Schools District Supervisor
 BACK

dual

SCORE

0.263

0.263

0.225

0.750

0.150

0.150

0.150

0.450

0.150

0.263
 SCORE

0.188

0.600

0.225

0.150

0.125

0.500

0.250

0.250
3.525
atisfactory
 MOVs FOR TI-III PPST

KRAs OBJECTIVES

1. Content Knowledge 1.    Applied knowledge on

and Pedagogy content within and across
curriculum teaching areas.

2.    Used a range of teaching

strategies that enhance learner
achievement in literacy and
numeracy skills.

3.    Applied a range of teaching

strategies to develop critical and
creative thinking, as well as
other higher – order thinking
skills.
 KRAs OBJECTIVES

2. Learning Environment 4.    Managed classroom

and Diversity of structure to engage learners,
Learners individually or in groups, in
meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands – on
activities within a range of
physical learning environments.

5.    Manage learner behavior

constructively by applying
positive and non-violent
discipline to ensure learning –
focused environments.

6.    Used differentiated,
developmentally appropriate
learning experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and
experiences.

3. Curriculum and 7.    Planned, managed and

Planning implemented developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning processes to meet
curriculum requirements and
varied teaching contexts.
 learning processes to meet
curriculum requirements and
varied teaching contexts.

KRAs OBJECTIVES

8.    Participated in collegial
discussions that use teacher
and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice.

9.    Selected, developed,
organized and used appropriate
teaching and learning
resources, including ICT, to
address learning goals.

4. Assessment and 10.  Designed, selected,

Reporting organized and used diagnostic,
formative and summative
assessment strategies
consistent with curriculum
requirements.
 KRAs OBJECTIVES

11.  Monitored and evaluated

learner progress and
achievement using learner
attainment data.

12.  Communicated promptly
and clearly the learners’ needs,
progress and achievement to
key stakeholders, including
parents/guardians.

5. Plus Factor 13.  Performed various related

works/activities that
contribute to the teaching –
learning process.
Vs FOR TI-III PPST

Means of Verification (MOV)

With reference to MOVs
1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet
and/or inter – observer agreement form about
knowledge of content within and across curriculum
teaching areas with a rating of at least level 6.
2.    Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed
highlighting integration of content knowledge within
and across subject areas.
3.    Instructional materials highlighting mastery of
content and its integration in other subject areas.
4.    Performance tasks/test materials highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and across
subject areas.
5.    Others (Please specify and provide
annotations).
1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet
and/or inter-observer agreement form about
teaching strategies that enhance leaner
achievement in literacy and numeracy skills with a
rating of at least level 6.
2.    Lesson plans/modified DLL used in teaching
highlighting learner – centered strategies that
promote literacy and/ or numeracy skills.
3.    Centered strategies that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills.
4.    Instructional materials highlighting learner –
centered strategies that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills. tasks/test materials(s) used in
5.    Performance
teaching.
6.    Results of assessment used in teaching.
7.    Others (please specify and provide
annotations).
1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheets
and/or inter – observer agreement form about
teaching strategies to develop critical and creative
thinking, as well as other higher – order thinking
skills with a rating of at least level 6.
2.    Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in teaching
highlighting different teaching strategies that
develop critical and creative thinking and/ or other
HOTS.
3. instructional materials highlighting different
teaching strategies that develop critical and
creative thinking and/ or other HOTS.
4.    Performance tasks/test materials used in
demonstration teaching.
5.    Results of assessment used in teaching.
6.    Others (Please specify and provide
annotations).
 Means of Verification (MOV)
With reference to MOVs
1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet
and/or inter – observer agreement form about
knowledge of managing classroom structure that
engages learners in various activities with a rating
of at least level 4.
2.    Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
various classroom management strategies that
engage learners in activities/tasks within available
physical learning environments.
3.    Others (Please specify and provide
annotations).
Classroom observation tool(COT) rating sheet and/or
inter-observer agreement form (with a rating of at least
level 6) about teacher management of learner behavior
using the following strategies:
1.    Providing motivation
2.    Praising the learners/ giving the positive
feedback
3.    Setting house rules/guidelines
4.    Ensuring learners’ active participation
5.    Allowing learners to express their
ideas/opinions
6.    Giving equal opportunities to learners
7.    Encouraging learners to ask questions
8.    Others (specify and provide annotation.
1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating
sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about using differentiated, developmentally
appropriate learning experiences with a rating of
at least level 6.
2.    Lesson plans/modified DLL developed
highlighting differentiation in content, product,
process, learning environment or others
according to learners’ gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences.

3.    Instructional materials developed highlighting

differentiation in content, product, process,
learning environment to others according to
learners’ gender, needs, strengths, interests and
experiences.

4.    Others (specify and provide annotation)

1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating
sheet and/or inter – observer agreement form
about using developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning process with a rating at
least level 6.
2.    Lesson plans/modified DLL highlighting
developmentally sequenced instruction that
meet curriculum goals and varied teaching
contexts.
 Means of Verification (MOV)
With reference to MOVs

3.    Instructional materials used to implement

developmentally sequenced teaching and
learning process to meet curriculum
requirements and varied teaching contexts

4.    Others (specify and provide annotation)

1.    Personal notes of teachers on
LACs/FGD/Meetings with proof of attendance.
2.    Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of
teacher and learner feedback to enrich teaching
practice with proof of attendance

3.    Others (specify and provide annotation)

1.    Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet

and/or inter-observer agreement form (with a rating of
at least level 6) about using appropriate teaching and
learning resources, including ICT with a rating of at
least level 6.

Examples:
·         Activity sheets/task sheets/ work sheets
·         Power point presentation
·         Video clips
·         Module
·         SIM – Strategic Intervention Materials
·         Others
2.    Lesson plans/modified DLLs with appropriate
instructional materials appended
3.    Others (specify and provide annotation).
1.    Prepared lesson plans/ modified DLLs
highlighting appropriate use of formative
assessment strategies.
2.    Developed diagnostic tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
accomplished questionnaire/answer sheets

3.    Developed summative tests: (a) with TOS

reviewed by the superior; (b) with sample
accomplished questionnaire/ answer sheets.

4.    Developed performance tasks: (a) with

rubrics reviewed by superior; (b) with sample
accomplished rubrics.

5.    Others (specify and provide annotation).

 Means of Verification (MOV)
With reference to MOVs
1.    Compilation of learner’s written work with
summary of results and with signature of
parents.
2.    Formative/summative assessment tools with
TOS and frequency of errors with identified least
mastered skills.
3.    Class records/ grading sheets
4.    Lesson
5.    Plans/modified DLL showing index of
mastery.
6.    Others (specify and provide annotation).
1.    At least 3 samples of corrected test papers of
same 3 learners in the same learning area with
parents’ or guardian signature and date of
receipt.
2.    Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent – Teacher
conferences in all quarters with proof of
parent’s/guardian’s attendance
3.    Reports cards with parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters supported by minutes of
meeting.
4.    Communication with parents/guardians using
various modalities.
5.    Anecdotal record showing entries per
quarter.
6.    Other documents showing leaners’ needs,
progress and
7.    Achievement submitted to other
stakeholders.
1.    Certificate of Recognition or Participation
2.    Certificate of Training
3.    Certificate of Speakership
4.    Committee involvement
5.    Advisor ship of Co-curricular activities.
6.    Book or Journal Authorship/ Co-authorship/
Contributor ship
7.    Coordinatorship/ Chairpersonship
8.    Coaching and mentoring learners in
competitions
9.    Mentoring pre-service/ in-service teachers
10.  Others (specify and provide annotation).