PDCA 3 Applied in Education
PDCA 3 Applied in Education
PDCA 3 Applied in Education
Improvement
August 8, 2014 | Process
PDCA is a problem-solving process that is the basis for successful school improvement and that is also
useful for the activities of individuals and teams, and of school leaders, teachers, and students.
PDCA is a simple, straightforward process that I recommend as the basis for school improvement
programs. PDCA is sometimes called the Deming Cycle after Continuous Improvement advocate W.
Edwards Deming. (Deming himself called it the Shewhart Cycle after his colleague Walter Shewhart.)
Or Springboard Schools uses a similar process that they call the Cycle of Inquiry.
1. Identify Problem
2. Formulate Questions
3. Set Goals
4. Develop Plan
5. Implement
6. Review and Assess
As a quick web search will show, there many, many other problem-solving processes that are similar
to PDCA, some with four steps, others with six or seven. Take your pick. The goal is to put in place a
structured processes for inquiry and critical thinking, a process that will promote exploration,
discovery, experimentation, and critical thinking throughout the school.
Even though other processes might work, I recommend PDCA for three reasons:
First, PDCA is flexible and can be used in a variety of situations. Individuals — teachers, school,
leaders, or students — can use it. Groups can use it to plan school-level improvements or classroom-
level improvements. Teams or task forces can use it. Teachers planning lessons can use it. Students
working in groups or as individuals can use it to set goals or make plans. It can be used in any
situation where it is appropriate to set a goal, make a plan, and implement the plan. It is a more or
less generic process for learning and improvement that encourages inquiry, exploration, and
reflection.
The following chart shows what PDCA would look like applied to the school and committees or
groups within the school, to instruction, to individuals (school leaders and teachers), and to students.
In recent years, the use of student data has become increasingly concerned with management
of teacher performance. However, when teachers become aware of specific student data
directly related to their approach of teaching, it could inform them about possible strengths,
weaknesses or challenges. Unfortunately, teachers generally have little time and encounter
significant problems in the interpretation and use of data for change. In this article, we put
forward that such problems can be avoided by offering teachers practical frames that are aimed
at the interpretation and productive use of student data. We report on an extensive study that
was done in the setting of reform implementation where teachers were asked to change their
teaching practices. Participating teachers performed multiple PDCA(Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycles
in which they designed and taught lessons where student data were collected. To interpret and
make use of such student data for change, we provided participants with practical frames. We
examined to what extent and in what way participants used these frames and how this
influenced professional development. Results showed that participants used frames to both
interpret student data and make changes to their teaching practices towards that required by the
reform in a stepwise, rather independent way.
hm