2008 LE Needelman Water
2008 LE Needelman Water
2008 LE Needelman Water
By: Bill Needelman, Filtration Science Solutions, Inc. and Greg LaVallee, Donaldson Company, Inc.
Figure 2. Water Contamination Survey Figure 4. Comparing Lube & Hydraulic System Water Contamination.
- Summary of Results for All Systems
Figure 3. Comparing Particle Contamination with Water Contamination. Figure 5. Water Contamination in Gearboxes.
good news is that nearly 8 out of 10 systems (79%) are in the preferred
range, ≤ 50% saturation. The bad news is that 1 out of 9 systems (11%) ingression. Figure 5 shows the results only for gearboxes. Interesting,
contain free water. The remaining systems were in the marginal zone although 85% of the gearboxes surveyed are in the preferred range of ≤
greater than 50% saturation but with no free water. The fact that no 50% saturation, 11% of the gearboxes surveyed had free water. This
systems are in the 75% - 100% saturation range is a bit mysterious. This may be because many gearboxes run hot and drive off water from the
may simply be a statistical quirk, and larger numbers of samples would lubricant; these gearboxes run dry. However, most gearboxes are also
have turned up some results in this range. It may also be that systems open to the environment. Open gearboxes exposed to high levels of
close to saturation are being exposed to sufficient water to push them water ingression are likely to become wet. Sources of water ingression
over the top into the free water range. include: rain, hoses, and humid air.
Figure 3 compares particle contamination with water contamination. Figure 6 compares results between systems with and without water
In the 3-digit ISO Code, the middle digit represents numbers of particles contamination control equipment. Water contamination control
greater than 6 μm. We chose this 6 μm size to represent particle equipment included: standard desiccant breathers, regenerable
contamination for each system, as shown on the Y-axis. The X-axis lists desiccant breathers, water absorbing cartridges, centrifuges,
water contamination as percent saturation. A 6 μm ISO Code of 20 and coalescers, and vacuum dehydrators. Surprising, the same percentage
greater is considered highly contaminated. Approximately one-third of (79%) of protected and unprotected systems are in the preferred range
the systems sampled were in this particle contamination range, which of ≤ 50% saturation. Shockingly, more of the protected systems
is disturbing in itself. Interesting, the majority of these dirty systems contained free water than unprotected systems, 13% to 11%. At the
were dry – less than 50% saturated. In contrast some of the cleaner very least systems with water contamination control equipment should
systems, with 6 μm ISO Codes of 18 and less, contained copious not contain free water, yet more than 1 out of 8 did! To investigate this
amounts of free water. In general, it appears there is little correlation - contradiction we assembled the results for water protection equipment,
a disconnect - between particle contamination control and water but excluded systems protected by the regenerable breather drier, the
contamination control. The message is that to avoid contamination T.R.A.P.™ Results are shown in Figure 7. More than one out of five
problems, both good particle control and good water control are (21%) of these systems had free water! We now have our answer.
required, and they are not the same. Many water contamination control products are hassles to operate and
Figure 4 compares water contamination results for lube and hydraulic maintain. They may be installed, but they are too much trouble to
systems. The main difference is the greater number of lube systems operate properly. In contrast, results for the hassle-free regenerable
containing free water. This is probably because many lube systems are breather are shown in Figure 8. 90% of these systems are in the
more open to the environment, increasing the likelihood of water preferred range. No free water is found in any of them.