Verification Test Report J11458-Val: Product Tested: Test Type: Standard
Verification Test Report J11458-Val: Product Tested: Test Type: Standard
Verification Test Report J11458-Val: Product Tested: Test Type: Standard
J11458-Val
Job #: J11458-7814
Authorization
Michael Farragher
Laboratory Technician
Test Performed By Date
Michael Farragher
Laboratory Technician
Test Report Written By Date
Noel Murphy
Laboratory Supervisor
Test Report Approved By Date
Page 1 of 33
Testing at Anecto’s Test Centre is performed in accordance with standard test procedures. Reported test results
are accurate within generally accepted commercial ranges of accuracy, unless a specific measure of greater
accuracy has been agreed to in writing by Anecto Ltd.
Anecto’s Test Centre reports apply only to the specific samples tested under stated test conditions using
functional test routines provided by the client. It is the manufacturer’s responsibility to assure that additional
production units of this model are manufactured with identical electrical and mechanical components. Anecto Ltd.
shall have no liability for any deductions, inferences or generalizations drawn by the client or others from Anecto’s
issued reports.
This report is the confidential property of the client. As a mutual protection to our clients, the public and
ourselves, extracts from the test report shall not be reproduced except in full without Anecto’s prior written
approval.
Page 2 of 33
Table of Contents
Page 4 of 33
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Description
The purpose of this test report is to verify the Vox Power VCCM600M medical AC/DC conduction
cooled configurable power supply (UUT). Validation testing was carried out on 7 Vox Power
VCCM600M medical AC/DC conduction cooled configurable power supply (UUT).
During the validation testing the UUT were exposed to operational and non-operational
environmental testing (temperature and humidity), operational and non-operational altitude and
non-operational thermal shock testing.
The UUT were also subjected to operational and non-operational mechanical testing (vibration and
mechanical shock) and a non-operational freefall shock test as outlined in the test product details
table.
Page 5 of 33
1.3 References
Test Standard
*Temperature & Humidity Customer Specified
*Altitude Testing Customer Specified
Sinusoidal Vibration IEC 60068-2-6, 2007, Test Fc
Random Vibration IEC 60068-2-64, 2008, Test Fh
*Random Vibration 810G Method 514.6 Procedure 1 (General Vibration)
Category 4 Trucks and Trailers, (composite wheeled vehicle) Figure 514.6C-3
Category 7 (Aircraft, Helicopter), Figure 514.6C-8, Table 514.6X General
Category 24 (All minimum Integrity) Figure 514.6E-1
Thermal Shock MIL-STD-810G Method 503.5 Procedure 1-C Multicycle 3 shocks
Mechanical Shock IEC 60068-2-27, 2008, Test Ea
Transit Drop 810G: Method 516.6, Procedure IV,
*denotes test or test parameters outside scope of ISO17025 accreditation
1.4 Observations
Vibration Profiles
A visual and functional test was performed before and after the various sinusoidal and random
vibration profiles and there were no issues noted.
Mechanical Shock
A visual and functional test was performed before and after the mechanical shock test and there
were no issues noted.
There were no other visual issues and the UUT powered up without any issues after every transit
drop test. The UUT were returned to for further evaluation following completion of the testing.
Page 6 of 33
Altitude Testing
A functional and visual test was performed before and after the non-operational altitude test and
there was no issue noted.
Thermal shock
A functional and visual test was performed before and after the thermal shock in air profile test and
there were no issues noted.
The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the environmental testing for further
evaluation.
1.5 Fixturing
During the environmental testing the UUT were placed on shelves and free air allowed to move
about them. During the vibration and shock the UUT were secured with overhead clamps and
vertical threaded bars. The UUT were using 230VAC and the load modules were connected to
electronic loads during the operational temperature and humidity, operational altitude, and
operational vibration tests. During the operational mechanical shock test the UUT was not loaded but
powered at 230VAC.
1.6 Equipment
Page 8 of 33
Three UUT were exposed to a temperature and humidity profile as described in the table below. The
UUT were not operational throughout testing.
2.2 Observations
A functional and visual test was performed before and after the non-operational environmental
temperature and humidity non-operational and there were no issues noted.
The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the environmental testing for further
evaluation.
Page 9 of 33
A UUT was exposed to temperature and humidity profile as described in the table below. The UUT
was operational throughout testing.
3.2 Observations
A functional and visual test was performed before and after the operational environmental
temperature and humidity non-operational and there were no issues noted.
The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the environmental testing for further
evaluation.
Page 10 of 33
A UUT was subjected to a sinusoidal vibration test according to EN60068-2-6 Test Fc as described
in the table below. The UUT was powered throughout the testing.
Description Values
10Hz – 500Hz 2G
Rate / Duration 1 Oct / min
Number of Sweeps 20
Test Duration
Z Axis 1hr 53 minutes
X Axis 1hr 53 minutes
Y Axis 1hr 53 minutes
Sinusoidal vibration test parameters
4.2 Observations
During the sinusoidal vibration testing the UUT was monitored for functionality. A functional and
visual test was performed before and after the sinusoidal operational test and there was no issue
noted. Throughout the testing the load modules were at maximum load while connected to electronic
loads located adjacent to the vibration table.
The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the operational random vibration
testing for further evaluation.
Sweep #: 20.0000
Sweeps Remaining: 0.0000 Spectral Dynamics CTRL: 1.9801 g
Frequency: 10.0000
A Sine g [Control]
10 x: 10, y: 1.98008
2
g (Log)
0.5
0.2
0.1
Page 11 of 33
Two UUT were subjected to a random vibration test according to EN60068-2-64 Test Fh as
described in the table below. The UUT was not powered throughout the testing.
Description Values
2
5Hz – 500Hz 0.02G /Hz
Acceleration Spectral Density 3.15Grms
Test Duration
Z Axis 30 minutes
X Axis 30 minutes
Y Axis 30 minutes
Random vibration test parameters
5.2 Observations
A functional and visual test was performed before and after the non-operational random vibration
profiles and there were no issues noted.
The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the environmental testing for further
evaluation.
Page 12 of 33
0.5
0.2
0.05
g²/Hz (Log)
0.02
0.005
0.002
0.0005
0.0002
5e-005
1e-005
2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 2000
Hz (Log)
Start Date: 10/13/16 Level Time: 0000:30:00 Stop Date: 10/13/16
Start Time: 08:37:00 Level Time Remaining: 0000:00:00 Stop Time: 09:20:34
Page 13 of 33
A UUT were subjected to a random vibration test according to EN60068-2-64 Test Fh as described
in the table below. The UUT was powered throughout the testing.
Description Values
2
5Hz – 500Hz 0.0122G /Hz
Acceleration Spectral Density 2.45Grms
Test Duration
Z Axis 30 minutes
X Axis 30 minutes
Y Axis 30 minutes
Random vibration test parameters
6.2 Observations
During the random vibration testing the UUT was monitored for functionality. A functional and visual
test was performed before and after the random operational test and there was no issue noted.
Throughout the testing the load modules were at maximum load while connected to electronic loads
located adjacent to the vibration table.
The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the operational random vibration
testing for further evaluation.
Page 14 of 33
0.5
0.2
0.05
g²/Hz (Log)
0.02
0.005
0.002
0.0005
0.0002
5e-005
1e-005
Page 15 of 33
Two UUT were subjected to a random vibration according to MIL STD 810G Table 514.6C-VI
Category 4 Composite wheeled vehicle vibration exposure, breakpoints shown in figure 514.6C-3 for
2 hours per axis as described in the table below. The UUT were not operational throughout testing.
Page 16 of 33
7.2 Observations
There were no visual or functional issues as a result of the random vibration testing. The UUT was
powered on using 90VAC without load after every axis and no issues were recorded. The UUT was
returned to the customer for further evaluation following completion of the testing.
Page 17 of 33
10
0.5
g²/Hz (Log)
0.1
0.02
0.005
0.001
0.0002
5e-005
1e-005
2e-006
10
0.5
g²/Hz (Log)
0.1
0.02
0.005
0.001
0.0002
5e-005
1e-005
2e-006
Page 18 of 33
5
g²/Hz (Log)
0.5
0.05
0.005
0.0005
5e-005
2e-006
Page 19 of 33
Two UUT were subjected to a random vibration according to MIL STD 810G Category 7 Method
514.6 Procedure I (General Vibration) as described in the table below. The UUT were not operational
throughout testing.
MIL STD 810G Category 7 Jet aircraft cargo method 514.6C-5 procedure I (general exposure)
Description Values
15Hz – 105.94Hz 0.01G2 /Hz
105.94Hz - 150Hz 6db
2
150.00Hz - 500Hz 0.02G /Hz
500Hz – 2000Hz -6db
Acceleration Spectral Density 4.02Grms
Test Duration
Z Axis 120 minutes
X Axis 120 minutes
Y Axis 120 minutes
Typical MIL STD Category 7 -Random vibration test parameters
8.2 Observations
There were no visual or functional issues as a result of the random vibration testing. The UUT was
powered on using 90VAC without load after every axis and no issues were recorded. The UUT was
returned to the customer for further evaluation following completion of the testing.
Page 20 of 33
10
0.5
g²/Hz (Log)
0.1
0.02
0.005
0.001
0.0002
5e-005
1e-005
2e-006
Page 21 of 33
Two UUT were subjected to a random vibration test according to MIL STD Category 24 General
Exposure Figure 514.6E-1 as described in the table below. The UUT was not powered throughout
the testing.
Description Values
20Hz – 1000Hz 0.04G2 /Hz
1000Hz – 2000Hz -6db
Acceleration Spectral Density 7.7Grms
Test Duration
Z Axis 60 minutes
X Axis 60 minutes
Y Axis 60 minutes
Typical MIL STD Category 24 - Random vibration test parameters
9.2 Observations
There were no visual or functional issues as a result of the random vibration testing. The UUT was
powered on using 90VAC without load after every axis and no issues were recorded. The UUT was
returned to the customer for further evaluation following completion of the testing.
Page 22 of 33
20
5
2
0.5
g²/Hz (Log)
0.2
0.05
0.02
0.005
0.002
0.0005
0.0002
5e-005
1e-005
Page 23 of 33
A UUT was exposed to a thermal shock in air profile according to MIL STD 810G Method 503.5
Procedure - IC as described in the table below. The thermal shock in air cycle was started in the cold
chamber.
Description Value
Hot Temperature 85°C
Cold Temperature -51°C
Dwell Time 60 minutes
Number of Cycles 3
Operational No
Test parameters
10.2 Observations
A functional and visual test was performed before and after the thermal shock in air profile test and
there were no issues noted.
The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the environmental testing for further
evaluation.
Page 24 of 33
Two packaged UUT were subjected to a freefall drop test according to MIL STD 810G Method 516.6
Procedure IV Transit Drop as described in the table below. The UUT were not powered during the
testing and was placed in its packaged form surrounded by the outer cover. The packaged UUT was
dropped onto a 2” plywood over concrete surface from a height of 48”.
11.2 Observations
The UUT was powered after every drop and visually inspected for any issues. Following the 19th
impact on the first UUT (drop on the front top left corner (AC power side (front)) it was observed that
RT1 and C1 were pushed in and the epoxy securing the components had broken off. At this point a
second UUT and package was used to complete the testing.
The packaged UUT was powered up after every drop and there were no visual or functional issues
as a result of the freefall drop test. The UUT were returned to for further evaluation following
completion of the testing.
Page 25 of 33
Typical freefall drop test RT1 and C1 pushed in following Front top left drop
Page 26 of 33
A UUT was subjected to a mechanical shock test according to IEC60068-2-27 as described in the
table below. The UUT was not powered throughout the testing.
Description Values
Peak Acceleration 30G
Pulse Width 18mS
Pulse Shape Half Sine
No.of Shocks per axis 6 (+/-X, +/-Y, +/-Z)
Total No of Shocks 18
Mechanical shock test parameters
12.2 Observations
There were no visual or functional issues as a result of the mechanical shock testing. The UUT was
powered on using 230VAC without load and no issues were recorded. The UUT was returned to the
customer for further evaluation following completion of the testing.
Page 27 of 33
Acceleration vs Time
Channel Description: G's msec In/S Filter Hz Max G's Min G's
Page 28 of 33
A UUT was subjected to a mechanical shock test according to IEC60068-2-27 as described in the
table below. The UUT was powered throughout the testing.
Description Values
Peak Acceleration 50G
Pulse Width 11mS
Pulse Shape Half Sine
No.of Shocks per axis 6 (+/-X, +/-Y, +/-Z)
Total No of Shocks 18
Mechanical shock test parameters
13.2 Observations
There were no visual or functional issues as a result of the mechanical shock testing. The UUT was
powered on using 230VAC without load and no issues were recorded. The UUT was returned to the
customer for further evaluation following completion of the testing.
Page 29 of 33
Acceleration vs Time
Channel Description: G's msec In/S Filter Hz Max G's Min G's
Ch1 Channel 1 52.40 11.00 109.43 500.00 52.40 -6.82
Page 30 of 33
Three UUT was subjected to a non-operational atmospheric altitude test as described in the table
below. The UUT was not powered throughout the testing.
14.2 Observations
A functional and visual test was performed before and after the non-operational altitude test and
there was no issue noted.
The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the altitude testing for further
evaluation.
Page 31 of 33
A UUT was subjected to an atmospheric altitude test according as described in the table below. The
UUT was powered throughout the testing.
15.2 Observations
During the altitude testing the UUT was monitored for functionality and that its baseplate temperature
did not increase above 85C A functional and visual test was performed before and after the
operational altitude test and there was no issue noted. Throughout the testing the load modules were
at maximum load while connected to electronic loads located adjacent to the atmospheric chamber.
The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the operational altitude testing for
further evaluation.
Page 32 of 33
Baseplate internal temperature during test Baseplate cooled using 12VDC psu.
Page 33 of 33