Verification Test Report J11458-Val: Product Tested: Test Type: Standard

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 33

Verification Test Report

J11458-Val

Verification Test Report


J11458-Val

Product Tested: VCCM600 Power Supplies

Test Type: Verification Testing

Standard: Customer Specified Environmental Testing


– Non-operational and operational
EN60068-2-27 Mechanical Shock
EN60068-2-6 Sinusoidal Vibration
EN60068-2-64 Random Vibration
MIL STD 810G Method 514.6, Procedure I
(General Vibration) Category 4, 7 and 24
MIL STD 810G Method 503.5 Procedure I-C
Multicycle 3 shocks

Job #: J11458-7814

Date Received: 21st Jul 2016

Test Dates: 21st Jul 2016 – 17th Jan 2017

Report Date: 14th Feb 2017

Authorization

Michael Farragher
Laboratory Technician
Test Performed By Date

Michael Farragher
Laboratory Technician
Test Report Written By Date

Noel Murphy
Laboratory Supervisor
Test Report Approved By Date

Page 1 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Client(s): Brian McDonald Phone +353(1)4591161


Vox Power Ltd,
Unit 2,
Redcow Interchange Estate,
Balymount,
Dublin 22,
D22 Y8H2

Test Site: Anecto Ltd. Phone: (353)-91-757404


Product Test Centre Fax: (353)-91-757387
Ballybrit Business Park
Ballybrit
Galway
Ireland

Testing at Anecto’s Test Centre is performed in accordance with standard test procedures. Reported test results
are accurate within generally accepted commercial ranges of accuracy, unless a specific measure of greater
accuracy has been agreed to in writing by Anecto Ltd.

Anecto’s Test Centre reports apply only to the specific samples tested under stated test conditions using
functional test routines provided by the client. It is the manufacturer’s responsibility to assure that additional
production units of this model are manufactured with identical electrical and mechanical components. Anecto Ltd.
shall have no liability for any deductions, inferences or generalizations drawn by the client or others from Anecto’s
issued reports.

This report is the confidential property of the client. As a mutual protection to our clients, the public and
ourselves, extracts from the test report shall not be reproduced except in full without Anecto’s prior written
approval.

Page 2 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 5


1.1 Description ..................................................................................................................... 5
1.2 Test Product Details ....................................................................................................... 5
1.3 References..................................................................................................................... 6
1.4 Observations .................................................................................................................. 6
1.5 Fixturing ......................................................................................................................... 7
1.6 Equipment ...................................................................................................................... 7

2.0 NON-OPERATIONAL TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY PROFILE ........................................... 9


2.1 Description ..................................................................................................................... 9
2.2 Observations .................................................................................................................. 9

3.0 OPERATIONAL TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY PROFILE .................................................. 10


3.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 10
3.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 10

4.0 OPERATIONAL SINUSOIDAL VIBRATION ............................................................................. 11


4.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 11
4.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 11

5.0 NON-OPERATIONAL RANDOM VIBRATION .......................................................................... 12


5.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 12
5.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 12

6.0 OPERATIONAL RANDOM VIBRATION ................................................................................... 14


6.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 14
6.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 14

7.0 NON-OPERATIONAL RANDOM VIBRATION – CATEGORY 4................................................ 16


7.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 16
7.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 17

8.0 NON-OPERATIONAL RANDOM VIBRATION – CATEGORY 7................................................ 20


8.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 20
8.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 20

9.0 NON-OPERATIONAL RANDOM VIBRATION – CATEGORY 24.............................................. 22


9.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 22
9.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 22

10.0 NON-OPERATIONAL THERMAL SHOCK IN AIR .................................................................... 24


10.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 24
10.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 24

11.0 NON-OPERATIONAL TRANSIT DROP .................................................................................... 25


11.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 25
11.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 25
Page 3 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

12.0 NON-OPERATIONAL MECHANICAL SHOCK ......................................................................... 27


12.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 27
12.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 27

13.0 OPERATIONAL MECHANICAL SHOCK .................................................................................. 29


13.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 29
13.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 29

14.0 NON-OPERATIONAL ATMOSPHERIC ALTITUDE TESTING .................................................. 31


14.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 31
14.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 31

15.0 OPERATIONAL ATMOSPHERIC ALTITUDE TESTING ........................................................... 32


15.1 Description ................................................................................................................... 32
15.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 32

Page 4 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

1.0 Introduction
1.1 Description

The purpose of this test report is to verify the Vox Power VCCM600M medical AC/DC conduction
cooled configurable power supply (UUT). Validation testing was carried out on 7 Vox Power
VCCM600M medical AC/DC conduction cooled configurable power supply (UUT).

During the validation testing the UUT were exposed to operational and non-operational
environmental testing (temperature and humidity), operational and non-operational altitude and
non-operational thermal shock testing.

The UUT were also subjected to operational and non-operational mechanical testing (vibration and
mechanical shock) and a non-operational freefall shock test as outlined in the test product details
table.

1.2 Test Product Details

Model Test Description Qty Result


Non-operational temperature and humidity 3 Passed
Operational temperature and humidity 1 Passed
Non-operational low pressure altitude testing 3 Passed
Non-operational high pressure altitude testing 3 Passed
Operational low pressure altitude testing 1 Passed
Operational high pressure altitude testing 1 Passed
VCCM600 PSU

IEC Sinusoidal Vibration - Operational 1 Passed


IEC Random Vibration – Operational 1 Passed
IEC Random Vibration – Non Operational 2 Passed
IEC Mechanical Shock – Operational 1 Passed
IEC Mechanical Shock – Non Operational 1 Passed
MIL STD 810G Category 4 – Non Operational 2 Passed
MIL STD 810G Category 7 – Non Operational 2 Passed
MIL STD 810G Category 24 – Non Operational 2 Passed
MIL STD 810G Method 503.5 Procedure 1-C Multi-Cycle 3 Passed
3 Shocks – Non Operational
810G: Method 516.6, Procedure IV, Transit Drop 2 Passed

Page 5 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

1.3 References

Test Standard
*Temperature & Humidity Customer Specified
*Altitude Testing Customer Specified
Sinusoidal Vibration IEC 60068-2-6, 2007, Test Fc
Random Vibration IEC 60068-2-64, 2008, Test Fh
*Random Vibration 810G Method 514.6 Procedure 1 (General Vibration)
Category 4 Trucks and Trailers, (composite wheeled vehicle) Figure 514.6C-3
Category 7 (Aircraft, Helicopter), Figure 514.6C-8, Table 514.6X General
Category 24 (All minimum Integrity) Figure 514.6E-1
Thermal Shock MIL-STD-810G Method 503.5 Procedure 1-C Multicycle 3 shocks
Mechanical Shock IEC 60068-2-27, 2008, Test Ea
Transit Drop 810G: Method 516.6, Procedure IV,
*denotes test or test parameters outside scope of ISO17025 accreditation

1.4 Observations

Non-operational Temperature and Humidity Testing


A functional and visual test was performed before and after the non-operational environmental
temperature and humidity non-operational and there were no issues noted.

Operational Temperature and Humidity Testing


A functional and visual test was performed before and after the operational environmental
temperature and humidity non-operational and there were no issues noted.

Vibration Profiles
A visual and functional test was performed before and after the various sinusoidal and random
vibration profiles and there were no issues noted.

Mechanical Shock
A visual and functional test was performed before and after the mechanical shock test and there
were no issues noted.

Mechanical Shock – Transit Drop


The UUT was powered after every drop and visually inspected for any issues. During the testing a
second UUT and package was used as the carton original carton began to deteriorate following 6
freefall impacts, after a total of 17 impacts the UUT and the packaging was replaced, following a
drop on the front top left (AC power side (front)) had been completed it was observed that RT1 and
C1 were pushed in and the epoxy securing the components had broken off.

There were no other visual issues and the UUT powered up without any issues after every transit
drop test. The UUT were returned to for further evaluation following completion of the testing.

Page 6 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Altitude Testing
A functional and visual test was performed before and after the non-operational altitude test and
there was no issue noted.

Thermal shock

A functional and visual test was performed before and after the thermal shock in air profile test and
there were no issues noted.

The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the environmental testing for further
evaluation.

1.5 Fixturing

During the environmental testing the UUT were placed on shelves and free air allowed to move
about them. During the vibration and shock the UUT were secured with overhead clamps and
vertical threaded bars. The UUT were using 230VAC and the load modules were connected to
electronic loads during the operational temperature and humidity, operational altitude, and
operational vibration tests. During the operational mechanical shock test the UUT was not loaded but
powered at 230VAC.

1.6 Equipment

Equipment Make/ Model Asset No. Cal Due Date


Thermotron SM32CE-2 environmental chamber ANO1139 01 Apr 2017
Votsch VCS 7048-20 environmental chamber ANO2450 05 Sep 2017
Votsch VT7012S2 thermal shock ANO0905 23 Jun 2017
Vacuum tank ANO1325 N/A
Altitude high pressure controller ANO1858 11 May 2017
Altitude low box ANO1524 08 Mar 2017
Negative pressure transducer ANO1259 08 Mar 2017
Crystal pressure calibrator IS33-2 ANO1360 04 Apr 2017
Quantum Countdown timer ANO1722 20 Dec 2017
Array 3710A electronic load ANO2410 14 Jul 2017
Array 3710A electronic load ANO2411 14 Jul 2017
Array 3710A electronic load ANO2412 14 Jul 2017
Array 3710A electronic load ANO2413 14 Jul 2017
Temma 72-8345 DC power supply ANO2397 08 Mar 2017
Type T Thermocouple ANO1731 01 Nov 2017
Type T Thermocouple ANO2200 01 Nov 2017
Type T Thermocouple ANO1315 01 Nov 2017
Type T Thermocouple ANO1345 01 Nov 2017
Type T Thermocouple ANO1336 01 Nov 2017
Type T Thermocouple ANO1759 01 Nov 2017
Type T Thermocouple ANO2001 01 Nov 2017
Type T Thermocouple ANO1343 01 Nov 2017
Type T Thermocouple ANO1881 01 Nov 2017
Page 7 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Type T Thermocouple ANO2232 01 Nov 2017


Type T Thermocouple ANO2251 01 Nov 2017
Type T Thermocouple ANO1343 01 Nov 2017
Type T Thermocouple ANO1336 01 Nov 2017
HP34970 ANO2139 14 Jul 2017
Lansmont TP3 drop test software ANO1085 01 Nov 2017
Lansmont PDT226 drop tester ANO1065 N/A
5m Stanley measuring tape ANO2345 01 Aug 2017
Avco SM110-2 mechanical shock ANO1044 N/A
Dytran 350M42 shock accelerometer ANO1622 04 April 2017
Dactron Dual DSP shaker control system ANO2352 28 Sep 2016
CMR Charge Amplifier C/A2 ANO0793 15 Jan 2017
DJB A/20 Accelerometer ANO1491 28 Sep 2016
Spectral dynamics vibration table ANO1844 12 May 2017
PCB piezotronics accelerometer 357B03 ANO1844C 13 Jan 2017
PCB piezotronics charge amplifier 422E12 ANO1844D 14 Jan 2017
PCB piezotronics accelerometer 357B03 ANO1844E 15 Jan 2017
PCB piezotronics charge amplifier 422E12 ANO1844F 18 Jan 2017
PCB piezotronics accelerometer 357B03 ANO1844G 13 Jan 2017
PCB piezotronics charge amplifier 422E12 ANO1844H 14 Jan 2017

Page 8 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

2.0 Non-operational Temperature and Humidity Profile


2.1 Description

Three UUT were exposed to a temperature and humidity profile as described in the table below. The
UUT were not operational throughout testing.

Step Temperature Humidity Time


1 -51°C -% 6 hrs
2 20°C 95% 6 hrs
3 20°C 5% 6 hrs
4 85°C 5% 6 hrs
5 85°C 50% 6 hrs
6 50°C 95% 6 hrs
Test parameters

2.2 Observations

A functional and visual test was performed before and after the non-operational environmental
temperature and humidity non-operational and there were no issues noted.

The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the environmental testing for further
evaluation.

Environmental chamber setup for the non-operational temperature and humidity

Page 9 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

3.0 Operational Temperature and Humidity Profile


3.1 Description

A UUT was exposed to temperature and humidity profile as described in the table below. The UUT
was operational throughout testing.

Step Temperature Humidity Electronic Load Time


1 -40°C+2°C Uncontrolled % 600W 6 hrs
2 20°C+2°C 95%+5% 600W 6 hrs
3 20°C+2°C 5%+5% 600W 6 hrs
4 70°C+2°C 5%+5% 300W 6 hrs
5 70°C+2°C 50%+5% 300W 6 hrs
6 50°C+2°C 95%+5% 300W 6 hrs
Test parameters

3.2 Observations

A functional and visual test was performed before and after the operational environmental
temperature and humidity non-operational and there were no issues noted.

The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the environmental testing for further
evaluation.

Page 10 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

4.0 Operational Sinusoidal Vibration


4.1 Description

A UUT was subjected to a sinusoidal vibration test according to EN60068-2-6 Test Fc as described
in the table below. The UUT was powered throughout the testing.

Description Values
10Hz – 500Hz 2G
Rate / Duration 1 Oct / min
Number of Sweeps 20
Test Duration
Z Axis 1hr 53 minutes
X Axis 1hr 53 minutes
Y Axis 1hr 53 minutes
Sinusoidal vibration test parameters

4.2 Observations

During the sinusoidal vibration testing the UUT was monitored for functionality. A functional and
visual test was performed before and after the sinusoidal operational test and there was no issue
noted. Throughout the testing the load modules were at maximum load while connected to electronic
loads located adjacent to the vibration table.

The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the operational random vibration
testing for further evaluation.

Sweep #: 20.0000
Sweeps Remaining: 0.0000 Spectral Dynamics CTRL: 1.9801 g
Frequency: 10.0000
A Sine g [Control]
10 x: 10, y: 1.98008

2
g (Log)

0.5

0.2

0.1

5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000


Hz (Log)
Start Date: 10/13/16 Stop Date: 10/13/16
Start Time: 15:45:21 Stop Time: 17:39:11

IEC60068-2-6 - Typical sinusoidal vibration profile

Page 11 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

5.0 Non-Operational Random Vibration


5.1 Description

Two UUT were subjected to a random vibration test according to EN60068-2-64 Test Fh as
described in the table below. The UUT was not powered throughout the testing.

Description Values
2
5Hz – 500Hz 0.02G /Hz
Acceleration Spectral Density 3.15Grms
Test Duration
Z Axis 30 minutes
X Axis 30 minutes
Y Axis 30 minutes
Random vibration test parameters

5.2 Observations

A functional and visual test was performed before and after the non-operational random vibration
profiles and there were no issues noted.

The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the environmental testing for further
evaluation.

IEC60068-2-64 Typical non-operational random vibration setup (Y Setup)

Page 12 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Ctrl DOF: 120


Resolution: 1600 Spectral Dynamics Test Level: 0.0000 dB
CTRL: 3.1601 gRMS

A PSD g²/Hz [Control]


5 x: 0, y: 3.52273e-020 Locked

0.5

0.2

0.05
g²/Hz (Log)

0.02

0.005

0.002

0.0005

0.0002

5e-005

1e-005
2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 2000
Hz (Log)
Start Date: 10/13/16 Level Time: 0000:30:00 Stop Date: 10/13/16
Start Time: 08:37:00 Level Time Remaining: 0000:00:00 Stop Time: 09:20:34

IEC60068-2-64 Typical non operational random vibration profile - IEC

Page 13 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

6.0 Operational Random Vibration


6.1 Description

A UUT were subjected to a random vibration test according to EN60068-2-64 Test Fh as described
in the table below. The UUT was powered throughout the testing.

Description Values
2
5Hz – 500Hz 0.0122G /Hz
Acceleration Spectral Density 2.45Grms
Test Duration
Z Axis 30 minutes
X Axis 30 minutes
Y Axis 30 minutes
Random vibration test parameters

6.2 Observations

During the random vibration testing the UUT was monitored for functionality. A functional and visual
test was performed before and after the random operational test and there was no issue noted.
Throughout the testing the load modules were at maximum load while connected to electronic loads
located adjacent to the vibration table.

The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the operational random vibration
testing for further evaluation.

IEC60068-2-64 Typical random operational setup

Page 14 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Ctrl DOF: 120


Resolution: 1600 Spectral Dynamics Test Level: 0.0000 dB
CTRL: 2.5023 gRMS

A PSD g²/Hz [Control]


5 x: 0, y: 3.52273e-020 Locked

0.5

0.2

0.05
g²/Hz (Log)

0.02

0.005

0.002

0.0005

0.0002

5e-005

1e-005

2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 2000


Hz (Log)
Start Date: 10/13/16 Level Time: 0000:30:00 Stop Date: __/__/__
Start Time: 13:52:57 Level Time Remaining: 0000:00:00 Stop Time: __:__:__

IEC60068-2-64 - Typical operational random vibration profile

Page 15 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

7.0 Non-Operational Random Vibration – Category 4


7.1 Description

Two UUT were subjected to a random vibration according to MIL STD 810G Table 514.6C-VI
Category 4 Composite wheeled vehicle vibration exposure, breakpoints shown in figure 514.6C-3 for
2 hours per axis as described in the table below. The UUT were not operational throughout testing.

Typical MIL STD Category 4 - Random vibration test profile

Page 16 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Typical MIL STD Category 4 - Random vibration test parameters

7.2 Observations

There were no visual or functional issues as a result of the random vibration testing. The UUT was
powered on using 90VAC without load after every axis and no issues were recorded. The UUT was
returned to the customer for further evaluation following completion of the testing.

Page 17 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Ctrl DOF: 120


Resolution: 1600 Spectral Dynamics Test Level: 0.0000 dB
CTRL: 2.3096 gRMS

A PSD g²/Hz [Control]


100 x: 0, y: 0 Locked

10

0.5
g²/Hz (Log)

0.1

0.02

0.005

0.001

0.0002

5e-005

1e-005

2e-006

2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000


Hz (Log)
Start Date: 09/26/16 Level Time: 0002:00:00 Stop Date: 09/26/16
Start Time: 13:04:49 Level Time Remaining: 0000:00:00 Stop Time: 15:18:21

Typical MIL STD Category 4 vertical random vibration profile

Ctrl DOF: 120


Resolution: 1600 Spectral Dynamics Test Level: 0.0000 dB
CTRL: 1.4608 gRMS

A PSD g²/Hz [Control]


100 x: 4.375, y: 0.00532192 Locked

10

0.5
g²/Hz (Log)

0.1

0.02

0.005

0.001

0.0002

5e-005

1e-005

2e-006

2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 3000


Hz (Log)
Start Date: 10/13/16 Level Time: 0002:00:00 Stop Date: 10/13/16
Start Time: 10:13:42 Level Time Remaining: 0000:00:00 Stop Time: 12:26:20

Typical MIL STD Category 4 Transverse random vibration profile

Page 18 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Ctrl DOF: 120


Resolution: 1600 Spectral Dynamics Test Level:
CTRL:

A PSD g²/Hz [Control]


100 x: 117.5, y: 0.00200148 Locked

5
g²/Hz (Log)

0.5

0.05
0.005

0.0005

5e-005

2e-006

2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 3000


Hz (Log)
Start Date: 09/29/2016 Level Time: Stop Date: 09/29/2016
Start Time: 14:10:16 Level Time Remaining: Stop Time: 16:23:14

Typical MIL STD Category 4 Longitudinal random vibration profile

Page 19 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

8.0 Non-Operational Random Vibration – Category 7


8.1 Description

Two UUT were subjected to a random vibration according to MIL STD 810G Category 7 Method
514.6 Procedure I (General Vibration) as described in the table below. The UUT were not operational
throughout testing.

MIL STD 810G Category 7 Jet aircraft cargo method 514.6C-5 procedure I (general exposure)

Description Values
15Hz – 105.94Hz 0.01G2 /Hz
105.94Hz - 150Hz 6db
2
150.00Hz - 500Hz 0.02G /Hz
500Hz – 2000Hz -6db
Acceleration Spectral Density 4.02Grms
Test Duration
Z Axis 120 minutes
X Axis 120 minutes
Y Axis 120 minutes
Typical MIL STD Category 7 -Random vibration test parameters

8.2 Observations

There were no visual or functional issues as a result of the random vibration testing. The UUT was
powered on using 90VAC without load after every axis and no issues were recorded. The UUT was
returned to the customer for further evaluation following completion of the testing.

Page 20 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Ctrl DOF: 120


Resolution: 1600 Spectral Dynamics Test Level: 0.0000 dB
CTRL: 4.0178 gRMS

A PSD g²/Hz [Control]


100 x: 0, y: 0 Locked

10

0.5
g²/Hz (Log)

0.1

0.02

0.005

0.001

0.0002

5e-005

1e-005

2e-006

2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 2000 5000


Hz (Log)
Start Date: 09/26/16 Level Time: 0002:00:00 Stop Date: 09/26/16
Start Time: 16:54:35 Level Time Remaining: 0000:00:00 Stop Time: 18:58:56

Typical MIL STD Category 7 - Typical random vibration profile

Page 21 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

9.0 Non-Operational Random Vibration – Category 24


9.1 Description

Two UUT were subjected to a random vibration test according to MIL STD Category 24 General
Exposure Figure 514.6E-1 as described in the table below. The UUT was not powered throughout
the testing.

Description Values
20Hz – 1000Hz 0.04G2 /Hz
1000Hz – 2000Hz -6db
Acceleration Spectral Density 7.7Grms
Test Duration
Z Axis 60 minutes
X Axis 60 minutes
Y Axis 60 minutes
Typical MIL STD Category 24 - Random vibration test parameters

9.2 Observations

There were no visual or functional issues as a result of the random vibration testing. The UUT was
powered on using 90VAC without load after every axis and no issues were recorded. The UUT was
returned to the customer for further evaluation following completion of the testing.

Page 22 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Ctrl DOF: 120


Resolution: 800 Spectral Dynamics Test Level: 0.0000 dB
CTRL: 7.7181 gRMS

A PSD g²/Hz [Control]


100 x: 525, y: 0.0387795 Locked

20

5
2

0.5
g²/Hz (Log)

0.2

0.05
0.02

0.005
0.002

0.0005
0.0002

5e-005

1e-005

10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 2000


Hz (Log)
Start Date: 09/27/16 Level Time: 0001:00:00 Stop Date: 09/27/16
Start Time: 15:42:41 Level Time Remaining: 0000:00:00 Stop Time: 16:45:13

Typical MIL STD Category 24 random vibration profile

Typical MIL STD Category 24 random vibration test setup image

Page 23 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

10.0 Non-Operational Thermal Shock in Air


10.1 Description

A UUT was exposed to a thermal shock in air profile according to MIL STD 810G Method 503.5
Procedure - IC as described in the table below. The thermal shock in air cycle was started in the cold
chamber.

Description Value
Hot Temperature 85°C
Cold Temperature -51°C
Dwell Time 60 minutes
Number of Cycles 3
Operational No
Test parameters

10.2 Observations

A functional and visual test was performed before and after the thermal shock in air profile test and
there were no issues noted.

The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the environmental testing for further
evaluation.

Environmental chamber setup for the thermal shock in air profile

Page 24 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

11.0 Non-Operational Transit Drop


11.1 Description

Two packaged UUT were subjected to a freefall drop test according to MIL STD 810G Method 516.6
Procedure IV Transit Drop as described in the table below. The UUT were not powered during the
testing and was placed in its packaged form surrounded by the outer cover. The packaged UUT was
dropped onto a 2” plywood over concrete surface from a height of 48”.

Drop Drop Orientation Packaged UUT


1 Left 1
2 Right 1
3 Front 1
4 Back 1
5 Bottom 1
6 Top 1
7 Top left edge 1
8 Top right edge 1
9 Bottom right edge 1
10 Bottom Left edge 1
11 Top Front edge 1
12 Top Back edge 1
13 Bottom Back edge 1
14 Bottom Front edge 1
15 Front Left edge 1
16 Front Right edge 1
17 Bottom Right edge 1
18 Bottom Left edge 1
19 *Front Top left corner (Repeated again) 1
- *Front Top left corner 2
20 Front Left Bottom corner 2
21 Front Right Top corner 2
22 Front Right Bottom corner 2
23 Bottom Left Top corner 2
24 Bottom Back Top corner 2
25 Bottom Right Bottom corner 2
26 Bottom left Bottom corner 2
Mechanical Shock – Freefall test parameters
*Changed UUT from UUT1 to UUT2 as packaging deteriorated.

11.2 Observations

The UUT was powered after every drop and visually inspected for any issues. Following the 19th
impact on the first UUT (drop on the front top left corner (AC power side (front)) it was observed that
RT1 and C1 were pushed in and the epoxy securing the components had broken off. At this point a
second UUT and package was used to complete the testing.

The packaged UUT was powered up after every drop and there were no visual or functional issues
as a result of the freefall drop test. The UUT were returned to for further evaluation following
completion of the testing.

Page 25 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Typical freefall drop test RT1 and C1 pushed in following Front top left drop

Internal packaging following 17 / 26 freefall impacts

Page 26 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

12.0 Non-Operational Mechanical Shock


12.1 Description

A UUT was subjected to a mechanical shock test according to IEC60068-2-27 as described in the
table below. The UUT was not powered throughout the testing.

Description Values
Peak Acceleration 30G
Pulse Width 18mS
Pulse Shape Half Sine
No.of Shocks per axis 6 (+/-X, +/-Y, +/-Z)
Total No of Shocks 18
Mechanical shock test parameters

12.2 Observations

There were no visual or functional issues as a result of the mechanical shock testing. The UUT was
powered on using 230VAC without load and no issues were recorded. The UUT was returned to the
customer for further evaluation following completion of the testing.

Typical mechanical shock test setup (Z Axis)

Page 27 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Acceleration vs Time
Channel Description: G's msec In/S Filter Hz Max G's Min G's

Ch1 Channel 1 35.08 18.05 122.69 500.00 35.08 -4.81

Mechanical shock non operational profile

Page 28 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

13.0 Operational Mechanical Shock


13.1 Description

A UUT was subjected to a mechanical shock test according to IEC60068-2-27 as described in the
table below. The UUT was powered throughout the testing.

Description Values
Peak Acceleration 50G
Pulse Width 11mS
Pulse Shape Half Sine
No.of Shocks per axis 6 (+/-X, +/-Y, +/-Z)
Total No of Shocks 18
Mechanical shock test parameters

13.2 Observations

There were no visual or functional issues as a result of the mechanical shock testing. The UUT was
powered on using 230VAC without load and no issues were recorded. The UUT was returned to the
customer for further evaluation following completion of the testing.

Typical mechanical shock test setup (Z Axis)

Page 29 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Acceleration vs Time
Channel Description: G's msec In/S Filter Hz Max G's Min G's
Ch1 Channel 1 52.40 11.00 109.43 500.00 52.40 -6.82

Mechanical shock operational profile

Page 30 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

14.0 Non-Operational Atmospheric Altitude Testing


14.1 Description

Three UUT was subjected to a non-operational atmospheric altitude test as described in the table
below. The UUT was not powered throughout the testing.

Description High Pressure Low Pressure


Setpoint -200m Min (+24mbar(g)) +5000m (-475mbar(g))
Dwell 4 hrs 4 hrs
Ramp Time 10 minutes 10 minutes
Test parameters

14.2 Observations

A functional and visual test was performed before and after the non-operational altitude test and
there was no issue noted.

The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the altitude testing for further
evaluation.

Atmospheric non-operational setup

Page 31 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

15.0 Operational Atmospheric Altitude Testing


15.1 Description

A UUT was subjected to an atmospheric altitude test according as described in the table below. The
UUT was powered throughout the testing.

Description High Pressure Low Pressure


Setpoint -200m Min (+24mbar(g)) +3000m (-316mbar)
Dwell 4 hrs 4 hrs
Ramp Time 10 minutes 10 minutes
Test parameters

15.2 Observations

During the altitude testing the UUT was monitored for functionality and that its baseplate temperature
did not increase above 85C A functional and visual test was performed before and after the
operational altitude test and there was no issue noted. Throughout the testing the load modules were
at maximum load while connected to electronic loads located adjacent to the atmospheric chamber.

The UUT were returned to the customer following completion of the operational altitude testing for
further evaluation.

Page 32 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0


Verification Test Report
J11458-Val

Atmospheric operational setup

Baseplate internal temperature during test Baseplate cooled using 12VDC psu.

Page 33 of 33

ANT002 Report Template Issue 4.0

You might also like