Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 153 views

    Department of Education: Republic of The Philippines

    Uploaded by

    Rutchel
    The document is an evaluation form from the Department of Education in the Caraga Region of the Philippines thanking participants for attending a learning session. It asks participants to rate their satisfaction with the session, the objectives, facilitator effectiveness, and logistics on a scale of 1 to 4. It also includes open-ended questions about insights gained, the most and least helpful parts, and any other comments. The evaluation aims to gather feedback to improve future trainings and conferences conducted by the division office.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Department of Education: Republic of The Philippines

    Uploaded by

    Rutchel
    153 views1 page
    The document is an evaluation form from the Department of Education in the Caraga Region of the Philippines thanking participants for attending a learning session. It asks participants to rate their satisfaction with the session, the objectives, facilitator effectiveness, and logistics on a scale of 1 to 4. It also includes open-ended questions about insights gained, the most and least helpful parts, and any other comments. The evaluation aims to gather feedback to improve future trainings and conferences conducted by the division office.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    7-Offline-QAME-Evaluation-Tool-for-LDM-2-ASB

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is an evaluation form from the Department of Education in the Caraga Region of the Philippines thanking participants for attending a learning session. It asks participants to rate their satisfaction with the session, the objectives, facilitator effectiveness, and logistics on a scale of 1 to 4. It also includes open-ended questions about insights gained, the most and least helpful parts, and any other comments. The evaluation aims to gather feedback to improve future trainings and conferences conducted by the division office.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    153 views1 page

    Department of Education: Republic of The Philippines

    Uploaded by

    Rutchel
    The document is an evaluation form from the Department of Education in the Caraga Region of the Philippines thanking participants for attending a learning session. It asks participants to rate their satisfaction with the session, the objectives, facilitator effectiveness, and logistics on a scale of 1 to 4. It also includes open-ended questions about insights gained, the most and least helpful parts, and any other comments. The evaluation aims to gather feedback to improve future trainings and conferences conducted by the division office.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Republic of the Philippines

    Department of Education
    Caraga Region
    SCHOOLS DIVISION OF SURIGAO DEL SUR

    Dear Participants,
    We sincerely thank you for the participation in the LDM 2 Module 2 Lesson 1 with the Facilitator SANDY G.
    SAPONG, JR.
    The Division Office through the School Management Monitoring and Evaluation would like to invite you to take a
    moment to complete this evaluation tool. Your feedback will offer improvement in the future conduct of the Division training
    and conferences.
    Thank you for your active participation.

    1. At a rate of 1 to 4 (where 4 is the highest), please indicate your overall satisfaction with this Learning Action Cell
    Activity. Encircle the number only.

    Very Satisfied Somewhat satisfied Somewhat Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied


    4 3 2 1

    2. Answer the following by encircling the number.


    A. Objectives

    Strongly Strongly
    Item Statements Agree Disagree
    Agree Disagree
    1 Clarity of Objectives 4 3 2 1
    2 Achievement of the objectives 4 3 2 1

    B. Facilitator Effectiveness

    Strongly Strongly
    Item Statements Agree Disagree
    Agree Disagree
    1 Overall performance 4 3 2 1
    2 Knowledge of the subject 4 3 2 1
    3 Methodologies used 4 3 2 1
    4 Presentation skills 4 3 2 1
    5 Ability to respond to questions 4 3 2 1
    6 Time management 4 3 2 1

    C. Logistics

    Strongly Strongly
    Item Statements Agree Disagree
    Agree Disagree
    1 Venue 4 3 2 1
    2 Materials and Equipment used 4 3 2 1
    D. Overall Impact: Outstanding

    1. If there was one major insight you gained from the LAC session, what is it?
    Answer:
    The relevance of MELCs as a response to a global health crisis and to ensure learning continuity.

    2. What part of the LAC session did you find most helpful?
    Answer:
    The general and specific purposes of the development of MELCs which is to serve as a guide for teachers as they
    address the instructional needs of learners while ensuring that curriculum standards are maintained and achieved.

    3. What part of the LAC session did you find least helpful?
    Answer:
    Nothing in particular because I believe every part of the session was informative especially for someone like me
    who is not an education major graduate.

    4. Other Comments and Suggestions


    Answer:
    The speaker really put emphasis about the importance of MELCs and he was knowledgeable about the topic.

    Balilahan, Mabua, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur, 8300


    (086) 211-3225
    [email protected]
    ISO Cert. No. AW/PH909100102

    You might also like