Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 135 views

    Poster Evaluation Form: Strengths

    Uploaded by

    hahahaha
    The document contains evaluation forms for posters and poster presentations. The poster evaluation form rates elements of poster content and appearance on a scale of 1 to 5, assessing how well the poster emphasizes key points, is organized, draws conclusions, and considers grammar. It also allows written feedback on strengths and areas for improvement. The poster presentation evaluation similarly rates a presenter's content, organization, examples, timing, and delivery qualities. Both forms aim to provide structured feedback to improve poster content and presentation skills.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Poster Evaluation Form: Strengths

    Uploaded by

    hahahaha
    135 views2 pages
    The document contains evaluation forms for posters and poster presentations. The poster evaluation form rates elements of poster content and appearance on a scale of 1 to 5, assessing how well the poster emphasizes key points, is organized, draws conclusions, and considers grammar. It also allows written feedback on strengths and areas for improvement. The poster presentation evaluation similarly rates a presenter's content, organization, examples, timing, and delivery qualities. Both forms aim to provide structured feedback to improve poster content and presentation skills.

    Original Description:

    Ygffgg

    Original Title

    222PosterEvalForm

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document contains evaluation forms for posters and poster presentations. The poster evaluation form rates elements of poster content and appearance on a scale of 1 to 5, assessing how well the poster emphasizes key points, is organized, draws conclusions, and considers grammar. It also allows written feedback on strengths and areas for improvement. The poster presentation evaluation similarly rates a presenter's content, organization, examples, timing, and delivery qualities. Both forms aim to provide structured feedback to improve poster content and presentation skills.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    135 views2 pages

    Poster Evaluation Form: Strengths

    Uploaded by

    hahahaha
    The document contains evaluation forms for posters and poster presentations. The poster evaluation form rates elements of poster content and appearance on a scale of 1 to 5, assessing how well the poster emphasizes key points, is organized, draws conclusions, and considers grammar. It also allows written feedback on strengths and areas for improvement. The poster presentation evaluation similarly rates a presenter's content, organization, examples, timing, and delivery qualities. Both forms aim to provide structured feedback to improve poster content and presentation skills.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Poster Evaluation Form

    Team members ______________________________ _______________________________

    ______________________________ _______________________________

    very impressive/ really needs


    effective/ error-free adequate work
    Poster Content
    Emphasizes key points/NEWS (appropriate title, 5 4 3 2 1
    headings, choice of visuals, layout)
    Summarizes scope of investigation 5 4 3 2 1
    Organization (overall and within sections) 5 4 3 2 1
    Accuracy and completeness of explanations 5 4 3 2 1
    Amount of detail is appropriate (not too detailed, not 5 4 3 2 1
    too superficial, just balanced)
    Defines key terms and avoids jargon 5 4 3 2 1
    Considers all data/variables and reports those that 5 4 3 2 1
    are significant
    Explains figures/tables on poster 5 4 3 2 1
    Draws distinct conclusions 5 4 3 2 1
    Grammar, spelling, punctuation 5 4 3 2 1

    average
    very high appeal appeal low appeal
    Poster Appearance
    Overall appeal 5 4 3 2 1
    Quality of visuals 5 4 3 2 1
    Colors not distracting, contribute to understanding 5 4 3 2 1
    Font (size, style, quality) 5 4 3 2 1
    Highlighting of major concepts (bullets, numbers, 5 4 3 2 1
    white spaces, arrows)
    Short text segments/not too text-heavy 5 4 3 2 1
    Consistent formatting 5 4 3 2 1

    Strengths:

    Areas for improvement:

    THE CAIN PROJECT IN ENGINEERING AND PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION


    POSTER PRESENTATION EVALUATION

    Presenter(s) ______________________________ _______________________________

    ______________________________ _______________________________

    needs more
    preparation,
    practice,
    and/or some
    very effective adequate re-thinking
    Content of presentation
    Introduced the study and provided a clear context 5 4 3 2 1
    Appropriate for audience 5 4 3 2 1
    Good organization and flow 5 4 3 2 1
    Examples or details where needed 5 4 3 2 1
    Timing of the talk (not too slow or fast, not too short 5 4 3 2 1
    or too long)

    Presenter
    Stance, eye contact, hand gestures, voice quality 5 4 3 2 1

    Strengths:

    Areas for improvement:

    THE CAIN PROJECT IN ENGINEERING AND PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION

    You might also like