Hypothesis: Mass Knowledge Gap
Hypothesis: Mass Knowledge Gap
Hypothesis: Mass Knowledge Gap
[3]
[4] C
issue.
As earl ier statements of the knowledge gap hypothesis
indicate, one way to conceptualize distribution and acquisi-
tion of knowledge is to view these processes within a social
control framework. Within any total social system, some
subsystems have patterns of behavior and values conducive to
change, while others have patterns that are more resistant to
change. Therefore, these predisposed subsystems tend to
adopt and act upon information at a faster rate than more
stagnant subsystems.
These patterns of differential acquisition of information
have major consequences for maintenance of elite or special-
[5]
pluralistic it is.
Since pluralism by definition involves differentiation and
specialization of roles and functions, one would expect that
the more pluralistic the community, the greater the possi-
bi I ities for widening the knowledge gaps between different
social strata within that community. A more pluralistic
community contains more sources of information, both
formal and informal, and requires more selective patterns of
self-exposure among its members. In a more homogeneous
community such as the small, traditional, rural service center,
there are fewer specialized media of communication and
more dependency upon common, informal, communication
to the entire local economic and social fabric. More than 98%
in Glenwood knew about the issue-more than for any other
single issue in all communities. &dquo;The whole town talked&dquo;
about the issue and information distribution across educa-
tional levels was highly uniform; the knowledge gap correla-
tion is only .04.
A similar high conflict issue, with a resulting low knowl-
edge gap, is in Cosmos, where there had been a history of
problems with sewage disposal and a bitter local dispute over
how to finance a new disposal plant.
Except for Glenwood, the mercury issue was relatively
remote and therefore generated low conflict. Sewage issues,
however, tend to be associated with higher conflict and lower
resu Itant knowledge gaps.
cv ’~ I
«fi
r
u
a
O)o
~!~ E
e o
,
0 3
’―
r LD
H 0
11
UJ A
-J 4-- W
v
Q E
-M m E E
L
cQ
0)U I
s
E
3fi 0
£
ee 10
W &dquo;§§
t- Q) I
£3?
j2 f
d
I
r
a l§
0
r_
3
jp
’E
3
E
E
0
u
0
r
Li
t
x
0
m
W
t-
0
Z
[16]
[17]
TABLE 2
Knowledge Differentials Between College-Educated and High School
or Grade School-Educated Segments, by Community, Topic and Year
NOTE: Boxes refer to the community in which that issue had the most immediate
local significance, in the sense that the question of mining pertained to an area
near Ely, the taconite plant is at Silver Bay, and the steel plant was in Duluth
itself. While differing measures of perceived importance were used in these
studies, such perceptions in general corresponded with level of perceived conflict
(see Tichenor, Rodenkirchen, Olien, and Donohue, 1973b).
a. The knowledge measure used in computing these differentials is based upon the
proportion in the community sample having any accurate knowledge about
current aspects of the issue. The figures in the table reflect the differential, in
percentage points, between the college group and the high school and
grade-school combined. Thus, a +5 on the mining issue in Ely in 1970 indicates
that the college group was 5 percentage points higher in having any accurate
knowledge on that issue than the group with less education.
1970, for example, the gap was low (5 points) for the local
mining issue and 18 and 25 points, respectively, for the
taconite and steel issues. In Silver Bay the knowledge gap for
the taconite issue was zero in 1970, whereas gaps did appear
for each of the other two issues.
In Grand Rapids the 1970 pattern is consistent with the
nature of the community. Grand Rapids, while more diversi-
fied than Ely, nevertheless is also a recreation area, and the
potential impact of mining on tourism related more directly
to Grand Rapids’ concerns than would be true for either
taconite or steel; well under 20% of the Grand Rapids
repondents reported occupations related in any way tQ steel
or taconite production, lowest of all four communities.
Therefore, the lower knowledge gap in Grand Rapids on the
mining issue in 1970, compared with the greater gaps on the
other two issues, is consistent with general social and
economic structure of that community.
Changes in the magnitude of the gaps from 1970 to 1972
are consistent with the basic knowledge gap hypothesis.
Where gaps do exist as a result of media attention and other
factors, a decline in attention to the issues from mass media
and other social institutions will lead to a reduction of the
gap as knowledge itself declines. There are only two cases in
Table 2 where gaps, if relatively high initially, did not decline
in 1972. One is on the steel issue in Silver Bay, where the
increase is negligible. The other is the taconite issue in Ely. It
should be pointed out that, with the continuing legal battle
over the taconite plant, this issue remained in the news to a
much greater extent than the other two issues did. Another
special factor in Ely is that, during the months preceding the
1972 study, a second weekly newspaper began publication in
the community in direct competition with an established
one. This newspaper immediately gave heavy attention to
both the mining and taconite issues, and its initial efforts to
gain circulation may well have contributed to differential
distribution of knowledge, assuming a possible tendency for a
[21]
CONTENT REDUNDANCY
CONCLUSION
NOTES
the level of abstraction being applied in a given empirical setting. For example, a
subsystem in a particular analysis might bean interest group in a community
REFERENCES