Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 53 views

    Monday, February 1, 2021 Sunday, February 14, 2021

    Uploaded by

    Juan Pablo Paez Pastrana
    The document provides guidelines and an evaluation rubric for Phase 1 of a course on strategic management. Students must complete individual activities that include updating their profile, reviewing course materials, participating in online forums, and writing a four paragraph article review analyzing a case study about Xerox's corporate strategy. Students will submit a PDF report compiling the required activities and evidence by the deadline. Their work will be evaluated based on content criteria related to demonstrating an understanding of strategic management concepts, and form criteria such as formatting, grammar, and submitting all required materials on time.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Monday, February 1, 2021 Sunday, February 14, 2021

    Uploaded by

    Juan Pablo Paez Pastrana
    53 views6 pages
    The document provides guidelines and an evaluation rubric for Phase 1 of a course on strategic management. Students must complete individual activities that include updating their profile, reviewing course materials, participating in online forums, and writing a four paragraph article review analyzing a case study about Xerox's corporate strategy. Students will submit a PDF report compiling the required activities and evidence by the deadline. Their work will be evaluated based on content criteria related to demonstrating an understanding of strategic management concepts, and form criteria such as formatting, grammar, and submitting all required materials on time.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    123sda

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides guidelines and an evaluation rubric for Phase 1 of a course on strategic management. Students must complete individual activities that include updating their profile, reviewing course materials, participating in online forums, and writing a four paragraph article review analyzing a case study about Xerox's corporate strategy. Students will submit a PDF report compiling the required activities and evidence by the deadline. Their work will be evaluated based on content criteria related to demonstrating an understanding of strategic management concepts, and form criteria such as formatting, grammar, and submitting all required materials on time.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    53 views6 pages

    Monday, February 1, 2021 Sunday, February 14, 2021

    Uploaded by

    Juan Pablo Paez Pastrana
    The document provides guidelines and an evaluation rubric for Phase 1 of a course on strategic management. Students must complete individual activities that include updating their profile, reviewing course materials, participating in online forums, and writing a four paragraph article review analyzing a case study about Xerox's corporate strategy. Students will submit a PDF report compiling the required activities and evidence by the deadline. Their work will be evaluated based on content criteria related to demonstrating an understanding of strategic management concepts, and form criteria such as formatting, grammar, and submitting all required materials on time.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 6

    Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

    Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación


    Course: Strategic Management
    Code: 212053

    Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric – Phase 1 Course recognition

    1. Activity Description

    Type of Activity: Individual


    Evaluation Moment: Initial
    Highest Activity Score: 25 points
    The activity starts on: Monday, February The activity ends on: Sunday, February
    1, 2021 14, 2021
    With this activity, the following learning outcomes are expected:

    Recognize experiences in real organizational contexts to understand the relevance of


    strategic management in the leadership of companies that are at the forefront of their
    economic sectors.

    The activity consists of:

    This course is in English and as it is specified in the Rules and conditions for
    course development: “The student must develop the proposed activities on due
    time, in English. Contributions in different languages won´t be evaluated”.

    Individual
    The student must develop the following activities:

    1. Update the profile, including a current picture where the student can be
    identified.

    2. Review all environments and download and analyze the syllabus of the course
    at the Learning Environment to have a clear understanding of the proposal,
    competences and contents to develop.

    3. Visit the Course´s General forum at the Initial Environment and participate on
    the Social Interaction Forum, sharing in English the following information:

    1
     Student´s name
     Student´s group
     Skype user
     Professional profile
     Expectations with this course and the course language (English).

    4. Visit the Synchronous attention by SkypePage at the Initial Environment,


    identify and add the skype user of your tutor to your contacts list in Skype,
    sending a message asking to be included in the skype group of the course,
    including the following:

     Student´s name
     Course name
     Student´s group number.

    Take a screenshot of your message on skype or of your participation in the


    skype group, to be included in the final work

    5. Read the following article, attached at the Learning Environment as Annex 1


    - Xerox case

    Xerox Outlines the Next Three Years of the Company’s Corporate Strategy and
    Plans. (2019). Seybold Report: Analyzing Publishing Technologies, 19(4), 2–7.

    6. According to the previous article, the contents outlined in the syllabus of the
    course and your own understanding of the concepts, using your own words,
    write an article review according to the following chart, answering the
    four questions proposed with one paragraph of 100 to 200 words each
    one:

    Xerox case Article Review


    Student name:
    Paragraph 1: In your own words, what is the meaning of Xerox´s slogan:
    “Made to think”?

    Paragraph 2: What concepts do you find interesting to understand


    strategic management in a company?

    Paragraph 3: What do you find relevant of the retrenchment strategy


    implemented by Xerox? Do you think it is a good option?

    2
    Paragraph 4: What is the importance of outlining the company´s strategy
    and plans?

    7. Consolidate all evidences in a PDF and submit it at the Evaluation


    Environment, according to the guidelines given below in section Individual
    Work Evidences, naming it with the following structure:

    Strategic Management_Phase 1_Student name_Group number

    Take into account that, your document will be analyzed by Turnitin in


    order to identify if there is any plagiarism from another article or another
    document presented by a student.

    keep in mind for the development of the activity:

    In the Initial Information Environment, you must: Review the agenda to identify the
    deadline, visit the General Forum and post your presentation and visit the
    Synchronous attention by SkypePage to identify the tutor user.

    In the Learning Environment, you must: Review the syllabus of the course and the
    Annex 1 to solve the activity.

    In the Evaluation Environment, you must: Submit individually the final document as
    a PDF with the structured indicated in this guide.

    Individual Work Evidences:

    The individual evidence to be submitted is:

    Each student submits a PDF document including:


     Cover
     Introduction
     Objectives
     Table of contents
     Profile update screenshot (Activity 1)
     Social Interaction forum participation screenshot (Activity 3)
     Skype group participation (Activity 4)

    3
     Article Review chart (Activity 6)
     Conclusions
     References (Use APA guidelines)

    From guidelines:
     PDF format
     Page Size: Letter
     Font type: Times New Roman
     Font size: 12
     Line spacing: Double
     Page margins: 2.54 cm
     Paragraph Alignment: Left-aligned

    Collaborative Evidences:

    No collaborative evidence is required in this activity.

    2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit.

    For Individual evidence, consider the following:

     All contents included in the work must be in English.

     The student must make sure the activity is written on his own words

     Before submitting the requested product, student should check that it meets all
    the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.

    Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
    with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
    Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
    comply with APA Format.

    In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
    You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found on the virtual
    campus.

    Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
    among others, are the following: paragraph e) "Plagiarism is to present as your own

    4
    work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
    another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
    includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference" and
    paragraph f) "To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
    research products, which have rights reserved for the University ". (Acuerdo 029 -
    13 de diciembre de 2013, Artículo 99)

    The academic penalties students will face are:


    a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
    score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
    b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
    will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

    3. Evaluation Rubric

    Type of Activity: Individual


    Evaluation Moment: Initial
    Highest Activity Score: 25 points
    First Evaluation High Level: Present in his own words, a four paragraphs article
    Criterion: review, explaining the importance of outlining the company´s
    strategy and plans, according to the case study, including
    Content criterion theoretical foundations of the strategic management.
    Recognize the
    importance of If your work is at this level, you can get between 13 points
    Strategic and 15 points
    Management in
    the real context of Average Level: Present his understanding of the importance of
    companies outlining the company´s strategy and plans, according to the
    case study, but, it does not evidence relevant concepts of
    This criterion strategic management, or it is missing some guidelines.
    represents 15
    points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 2 points
    of 25 points of and 12 points
    the activity.
    Low level: Don´t present the importance of outlining the
    company´s strategy and plans or it is not related to the case
    study

    5
    If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
    points and 1 points

    Second Evaluation High Level: Submit a PDF document, at the Evaluation


    Criterion: Environment, according to the given guidelines, evidencing
    proper grammar and spelling, presenting the development of the
    Form criterion article review, using the proposed formats and references in APA
    Present the format.
    document according
    to the format and If your work is at this level, you can get between 8 points
    guidelines specified and 10 points

    This criterion Average Level: Submit a document, developing the proposed


    represents 10 activities, evidencing some spelling and grammar mistakes or
    points of the total missing some items or guidelines.
    of 25 points of
    the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 2 points
    and 7 points

    Low level: Don´t submit the document evidencing his own


    development of the proposed activities.

    If your work is at this level, you can get between 0


    points and 1 points

    You might also like