Stock Market in A Liberalised Economy - Indian Experiences
Stock Market in A Liberalised Economy - Indian Experiences
Stock Market in A Liberalised Economy - Indian Experiences
Author(s): M. K. Roy
Source: Economic and Political Weekly , Jan. 27 - Feb. 2, 2001, Vol. 36, No. 4, Money,
Banking & Finance (Jan. 27 - Feb. 2, 2001), pp. 367-369+371+373+375-376
Published by: Economic and Political Weekly
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Economic and Political Weekly
M K Ro
lation can optimally underpin stable inter- this view. Major international institutions
Introduction national financial system [Murinde 1993]. satisfied with the fascinating growth of
On efficiency, it is argued that reform emerging markets also expressed their
converts stock market to fit free economy concern repeatedly over the unruly
shift in the balance in the economy
from state to private sector where society in effect authorises financial behaviour of markets of LDCs.
bestowed on the stock market system to allocate resources [Caprio and In this backdrop, the study aims to
the burden of pooling sufficient resources Levine 1994]. Many of the legal and evaluate implications of financial liberali-
from domestic, regional and international institutional arrangements basic to effi- sation on the growth and efficiency of
sources and allocating them efficientlycient for functioning of the market yet do not Indian stock market. Underlying purpose
productive uses. Only an active and effi- exist in many emerging markets. Reform of the study is simple. Success of liberali-
cient market can be conducive to success- confronts the problems existing institution sation largely depends on efficient mobili-
ful transition of economy. It is argued thatface and helps to season the market for sation and allocation of resources by fi-
a comprehensive liberalisation strategy efficient allocation of savings and invest- nancial system for productive investment.
takes care of both growth and efficiencyments. Theory of Friedman (1953) and If market fails to discharge these avowed
of equity market; many commentators, Fama (1965) on arbitrage operation further objectives, the programme of privatisation,
however, contested this statement. to say the least will suffer a big jolt in
reinforces assumption of pro-reform theo-
There is almost unanimity among aca- rists that efficiency of equity market in- LDCs. Thus Indian experiences along with
demics that liberalisation encourages for-creases in a liberalised economy. It is the lessons of other developing countries
mation of equity markets where they did would contribute to our understanding of
suggested that opening up of capital market
not previously exist and helps in theirwould allow foreign institutional investors the relationship between financial
deepening where they predated the reforms.(FIIs) to operate in emerging markets. Their liberalisation and asset market behaviour
Indeed, recently there has been a proli- policy of 'buy low and sell high'will usher and its impact on LDC economies.
feration of scholarly and popular articles
efficiency in these markets that will finally The paper is organised in the follow-
which extol the virtues of these rapidlyhelp to develop a stable international fi- ing manner. Section II explores the steps
expanding markets for less developed nancial system. taken so far and agenda for future action
countries (LDCs) economic performance Can liberalisation help to improve effi- to complete the goal of liberalisation.
and for investors worldwide. ciency of the market? There is no consen- Section III critically evaluates the impact
The expansion of equity markets of manysus in the scholarly literature about the of regime shift on the growth of the
Asian countries specially after liberalisationpossible impact of deregulation on the equity market. Section IV aims to com-
is truly impressive [Clemente 1994]. The efficiency of the market. Reformers confi- pare share price volatility in pre- and post-
market capitalisation of these countriesdent about the beneficial role of the stock liberalisation period. Very specifically
continues to grow. Some of these emerg-market in a free economy [Cho 1986] tend attempts will be made to verify whether
ing markets are comparable in size to theto undermine the scope of its unruly our finding confirms or belies the assump-
smaller European markets and many ofbehaviour in the post liberalisation period. tion of liberalisation theorists on asset price
them have been growing at a faster rateThose who oppose it often argue that stock volatility. An attempt will be made in
than European markets over the last fewmarket reforms may lead to over specu- Section V to measure the impact of reform
years and are likely to continue to do so.lation, financial crisis and misallocation of process on market efficiency. Thanks to
Fascinating growth of emerging marketssavings and investments to the detriment globalisation, FIIs now rule over Indian
suits 'global neoclassical' model which of real sector growth and stability [Singh capital market. Role of institutional
emphasises international financial openness. 1993, Grabel 1995]. Experiences of India investors in the efficient functioning of
The idea is that global financial deregu- and other developing countries support the market will be critically analysed in
What is the impact of regime shift on Services (excl utilities) 39.45 39.28 37.52 48.51 60.35 63.3 65.8
asset price behaviour? Is there any indi- Chemicals 13.6 12.8 21.09 14.47 8 11.5 9.3
The answer to these questions partly Number of Listed Companies Market Capitalisation (US $ Billions)
Before After Before After
depend upon the level of volatility that the
market exhibits. Markets with severe priceMalaysia (1980) 182 621 12.39 307
Philippines (1980) 138 216 3.47 81
swings that can be hardly explained byS Korea (1982) 334 760 4.44 139
fundamental economic factors might dis-Indonesia (1983-84) 16 253 .85 91
courage genuine investors to participate in Taiwan (1987) 141 382 49 470
the market, indulge in short-term specu- Source: Emerging Stock Market F
Schwert, however observed that stock the scope of arbitrage opportunity widens Venezuela .163 1.72
Korea .0490 2.9428
returns are negatively related to current with increased volatility and extreme
Philippines .5221 2.257
and lagged values of inflation. mispricing. Virtually messy behaviour of
Source: Ilene Grabel, 'Assessing th
Considering return from index as depen-emerging markets offering an excellent Financial Liberalisation on Stock Market
dent variable, we tried to measure the opportunity to 'better informed', 'more Volatility'. Journal of Development Studies,
influence of each of the economic variablesrational', domestic and foreign institutional vol 31, No 6, August 1995.
Thus we observe a positive correlation of (1.398) (.379) (.503) (-.321) (-.500) (-.552)
return during the period over which the naive (4) Interest on Debenture and Stock Prices: Changes in Stock Pr
domestic investors extrapolate and smart t-Regressed on Rate of Interest on Debenture (DEB)) in Per
FlIs collaborate with them and a negative CONS DEB DEB DEB DEB DEB R2 F DW
serial correlation of return in the long run to t-1 t-2 t t-43
when price reverts to mean. .3569 -.0010 -.0185 .0151 .0484 -.0656 .1011 2.09 1.421
This observation has a theoretical under- (2.217) (-.035) (-.463) (.379) (1.212) (-.311)
pinning that initial demand of FIIs always (5) Yield on Treasury Bill and Stock Prices: Changes in Stock Prices:
result from arrival of information about t-Regressed on Yield on Treasury Bill (YTB)) in Period t-n
strong fundamentals from LDCs and then CONS YTB YTB YTB YTB YTB R2 F DW
the whole process roles in. We maintain if to t-1 t-2 t t-3 t-
strength measured in terms of wealth influ- .403 -.0068 .0062 -.0158 .0118 -.0006 .042 .8156 1.2
ences pay off, powerful FIIs may manipulate(1.669) (-.648) (.415) (-1.048) (.781) (-.060)
price even in the absence of information so
(6) Inflation and Stock Prices: Changes in Stock Prices (RET) in Peri
that domestic trend chasers follow them.
Changes in the Price Level (DINF) in Period t+1
These sorts of price rigging are synonym to
CONS DINF DINF DINF DINF DINF R2 F D W
noise trading; clearly the attempt is to
to t+1 t+2 t+3 t+4
manipulate demand based on anything but
-.0130 1.457 1.037 .5601 -.1864 .4031 .0501 .9498 1.19
information. In any case price becomes noisy,
(-.862) (1.63) (1.158) (.620) (-.209) (.454)
it carries less information, it results in faulty
(7) Past Inflation and Stock Prices: Changes in Stock Prices (R
distribution of wealth, it causes excessive
Changes in the Price Level (DINF)) in Period t-n
gyration of share price that ultimately af-
CONS DINF DINF DINF DINF DINF R2 F D W
fects allocative efficiency of the market.
to t-1 t-2 t-3 t-4
The lesson of all these experiences is that
benefit that accrue to developing economy -.0162 1.1528 .7048 .5357 .1113 1.088 .0488 .9555 1.166
due to globalisation has a cost in terms of (-1.126) (1.349) (.823) (.634) (.131) (1.287)
higher risk of frequent market break. If the Note: Absolute t values are in parentheses below each coefficient.