In The Matter of The Probate of The Will of Consuelo Santiago Garcia GR No. 204793 June 8, 2020 Case Digest

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

In the matter of the probate of the will of Consuelo Santiago Garcia GR No.

204793; June 8, 2020

Facts: Consuelo had two daughters, (Remedios) and (Natividad). Remedios


predeceased Consuelo and left behind her children, which included Catalino
Tanchanco (Catalino) and Ronaldo Tanchanco .
On April 4, 1997, Consuelo, at 91 years old, passed away. On August 11, 1997,
Catalino filed a petition to settle the intestate estate of Consuelo. Natividad filed a
Motion to Dismiss[10] stating that she already filed a petition[11] for the probate of
the Last Will and Testament. As the named executrix in the will, Natividad also
prayed that letters testamentary be issued in her favor.

The Tanchancos filed an Opposition[13] to Natividad's petition for probate alleging


that the will's attestation clause did not state the number of pages and that the will
was written in Tagalog, and not the English language usually used by Consuelo in
most of her legal documents. They also pointed out that Consuelo could not have
gone to Makati where the purported will was notarized considering her failing
health and the distance of her residence in Pasay City. Moreover, they alleged that
Consuelo's signature was forged. Thus, they prayed for the disallowance of probate
and for the proceedings to be converted into an intestate one.
RTC denied the probate of the will but Ca reversed it holding that the will
complied with the formalities required under the law.

Issue: Whether THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED


WHEN IT ALLOWED THE PROBATE OF THE DECEDENT'S WILL  

Held: No. The Court concurs with the CA in holding that the trial court erred in
lending credence to the allegations of the Tanchancos which are bereft of
substantiation that Consuelo's signature was forged or that undue duress was
employed in the execution of the will in question. it is settled that "the law favors
testacy over intestacy.
The will faithfully complied with the formalities required by law. What is
imperative for the allowance of a will despite the existence of omissions is that
such omissions must be supplied by an examination of the will itself, without the
need of resorting to extrinsic evidence.In the instant case, the attestation clause
indisputably omitted to mention the number of pages comprising the will.
Nevertheless, the acknowledgment portion of the will supplied the omission by
stating that the will has five pages
The burden of proof is upon the Tanchancos to show that Consuelo could not have
executed the will or that her signature was forged. The Tanchancos failed to
disprove that Consuelo was more comfortable to use the Tagalog dialect in writing
the will.
About the claim of forgery, the same remains unsubstantiated because the
Tanchancos merely surmised that there were discrepancies in Consuelo's signatures
in the Residence Certificates and in the will, and insisted that the said signatures
should not be "perfectly written" and instead should be "crooked" due to
Consuelo's age.
Bare allegations without corroborating proof that Consuelo was under duress in
executing the will cannot be considered. The Tanchancos did not adduce evidence
to corroborate their allegation that Consuelo declared that she would not execute a
last will and testament, other than their self-interested statements.

Considering the foregoing, the will of Consuelo should be allowed probate as it


complied with the formalities required by the law.

You might also like