Heat Value of Four Hardwood Species From Sudan: January 2012
Heat Value of Four Hardwood Species From Sudan: January 2012
net/publication/266911262
CITATIONS READS
18 880
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Tarig Osman Khider on 15 October 2014.
* corresponding author
6
J OURNAL OF FOREST PRODUCTS & INDUSTRIES, 2012, 1(2), 5-9
Table 1
Heights and diameters of Acacia mellifera, Acacia Senegal, Eucalyptus tereticornis and Moringa oleifera.
Species Local name Height range Average height Diameter range Average diameter
(meters) (Centimeters)
Acacia mellifera Kitter 7-7.7 7.3 7.5- 8 7.7
Acacia senegal Hashab 7.5-9 8.3 7.5-8.7 7.8
Moringa oleifera Elrawag 6-7.5 6.8 16-18 17
Eucalyptus tereticornis Ban 8-10 9 11-14 12.5
The average basic density of four studied species was The chemical composition of four studied species was
determined as oven-dry mass/ green volume obtained determined according to TAPPI standard Test methods (T
according to B.S.373 [15]. Ten specimens were soaked in 204-cm-97 for solvents extractives, T207-cm99 for water
water until saturation; the green volume was determined by solubility, T211-om- 93 for ash, T212-om-98 for 1% NaOH
displacement of water in a graduated constant mass at 105 0C. extractives, T222-om-02 for lignin and T223-cm-01 for
The average basic density was calculated according to the Pentosans).while Kurchner –Hoffer cellulose was measured
following equation according to [16]. Meal was prepared using star mill with
Basic density, Kgm-3 = Oven-dry mass/ green (soaked) volume standard sieve according to TAPPI standard (T11- wd-79).
Bark to wood ratio by volume was determined by measuring
the girth of four discs for each species with and without bark III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
and was calculated as
Bark-to-wood-ratio by volume= 1- b2/ a2 The average values for basic density of Acacia senegal,
Where a = the average girth of the discs including bark Acacia mellifera and Eucalyptus tereticornis were 728, 703
B= the average girth of the discs without bark and 673 kgm-3 respectively (Table 2) classify them as high –
The bark –to- wood ratio by mass was measured on oven dry density woods according to Bin (1970) classification [17],
basis with and without bark while Moringa oleifera could be classified as low density
The heat value of wood was determined with a Krocher wood (226K gm-3) as a result of fast growth and presence of a
oxygen bomb calorimeter, samples of known moisture content large amount of parenchyma cells. The usual density range for
were molded into a pellet with fuse wire inside, weighed and commercial pulp wood is 350-650Kg m-3 [18].
burnt in the calorimeter. The temperature was recorded at 15
sec. intervals until it stabilized, then at one –minute intervals The average bark – to wood ratios by mass (Table 2) for
until five minutes after maximum temperature was reached. Moringa oleifera and Acacia senegal were moderately high
Each experiment was carried out three times. The heat (19 and 16.2% respectively), but for Acacia mellifera and
transferred to the calorimeter was calculated as follows Eucalyptus tereticornis (13.1 and 10.8% respectively) were in
Q= (Mw+ mw+ q)t, cal the normal range. The average bark-to- wood ratios by volume
Where: for A. senegal, A. mellifera and Moringa oleifera were
Mw=mass of water in calorimeter, g moderately high for commercial woods (20.1, 16.2 and 15.9%
mw =mass of water in bomb, g respectively) and in the normal range for Eucalyptus
q= mass equivalent of calorimeter, g tereticornis (11.9)
t= true temperature rise, corrected for heat loss obtained from
the group of temperature rise, The average gross heat of combustion (Calorific value) for
The heat generated was calculated as each of species studied and measured with oxygen bomb was
Q= MfH+ Mf. hf+ 40Mf, cal given in Table (3). It was to be found in the normal range for
Where: tropical hardwoods for Acacia mellifera, Acacia senegal and
Mf= mass of wood, g Eucalyptus tereticornis while for Moringa oleifera it was
mf= mass of fuse wire burnt, g lower with its lower density. Acacia senegal and Acacia
H= higher calorific value of the wood,cal/g mellifera heat values were more or less similar which was
hf= heat of fusion of fuse wire, cal/g supported further by their chemical composition (Table 4).
The heat value for Eucalyptus tereticornis was lower
compared to Acacias. These differences might be due to the
The higher heat value of the wood, H, was calculated by higher lignin content of both Acacia senegal and Acacia
equating the heat transferred with the heat generated and then mellifera, while for Moringa oleifera it might be attributed to
transferred into KJ Kg-1 the SI units (cal g-1 = 4.1868 KJ Kg-1) the high ash content and low density of the wood.
7
J OURNAL OF FOREST PRODUCTS & INDUSTRIES, 2012, 1(2), 5-9
Table 2
Physical properties of Acacia mellifera, Acacia Senegal, Eucalyptus tereticornis and Moringa oleifera
Basic density*, Kgm-3 703 25.8 728 27.8 673 28.4 226.3 11.4
Bark-to-wood ratio by mass,% 13.1 2.6 16.2 0.9 10.8 1.8 19 1.6
Bark –to-wood ratio by volume, % 16.2 0.9 20.1 2.4 11.9 3.0 15.9 1.6
*at 12% moisture content
X- Average value
± SD – Standard deviation
Table 3
Measured and calculated gross heat values for Acacia mellifera, Acacia senegal, Eucalyptus tereticornis and Moringa oleifera
Table 4
Chemical component of Acacia mellifera, Acacia Senegal, Eucalyptus tereticornis and Moringa oleifera from Sudan
Chemical component Acacia mellifera Acacia senegal Eucalyptus tereticornis Moringa oleifera
Ash 1.9 1.9 1.3 4.6
Total silica 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4
Solubility in:
Hot water 5.7 5.9 4.0 9.3
Alcohol 4.1 3.3 4.1 3.6
Alcohol-benzene (1:2) 3.0 2.9 2.2 3.0
1% NaOH 14.5 16.4 18.8 18.6
Kurschner-Hoffer Cellulose 51.5 47.8 45.1 50.9
Holocellulose 74.8 67.7 70.9 68.5
Alfa-cellulose 50.8 45.7 40.0 42.6
Pentosans 14.8 19.6 22.5 14.4
Lignin 23.3 22.2 21.8 24.9
Total extractives 7.0 8.1 6.4 9.2
Cellulose/ lignin ratio 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1
The regression coefficients for predicting variables as well as hardwood studied and their heat values. The Ash content is
the t-ratio, standard deviations and probabilities obtained were highly and negatively correlated with Holocellulose and heat
given in Table 5. The correlation matrix was given in table 6 value having a correlation coefficients of -0.676 and -0.756
showed the relationship between the chemical components of respectively, and lower negative correlation (-0.112) with
8
J OURNAL OF FOREST PRODUCTS & INDUSTRIES, 2012, 1(2), 5-9
alcohol benzene solubles content, it was positively correlated with the hot water soluble (0.365).
Table 5
Regression analysis of the data from heat value and chemical composition of wood.
The hot water solubles content was negatively correlated with the other hand it was negatively correlated with lignin content
heat value. Holocellulose and lignin contents (-0.514, -0.228 with correlation coefficient -0.478. The lignin content has
and -0.189, respectively) but it was positively correlated negative correlation with heat value and Holocellulose with
(0.326) with alcohol-benzene solubles content. Alcohol- correlation of -0.243and -0.246, respectively. Holocellulose
benzene solubles content has low positive correlation with heat has a positive correlation with heat value with a correlation
value and Holocellulose (0.228 and 0.163, respectively). On coefficient of 0.564.
Table 6
Correlation matrix for the chemical components and heat value of wood
7- . Shen, D. K Gu, S.. Luo, K. H and. Bridgwater, A. V. 2009. 14- . Elsaki O.T Otuk, S and. Khider, T.O. 2012. Sulfur-Free
Analysis of Wood Structural Changes under Thermal Radiation. Pulping Of Crateva Adansonii From Sudan. Journal of Forest
Energy & Fuels 23, 1081–1088. Products and Industries ,1(1), : 23-26
8- Doherty, A. E. Walsh1, Kevin P. McDonnell 2012. The 15- British standards, 1957. The British standards of testing small
Direct Use of Post Processing Wood Dust in Gas Turbines. Clear Specimens of Timber B.S 373. British Standard Institute,
Journal of Sustainable Bio-energy Systems, 2:60-64. London.
9- .Pastor-Villegas, J.M. Rodrıguez, M J.F. Pastor-Valle, M. 16- Obolenskaya, A.V., V.P. Tshegolov, G.I. Akim, N.C. Kossoviz
2007. Changes in commercial wood charcoals by thermal and N.L. Emelyannova, 1965. Practitcheshie Raboti po Himii
treatments. Journal of. Analytical Applied Pyrolysis 80 :507– Drevesinii Tzellulozi. Moscow, Lesporm. (In Russian).
514. 17- Bin, P.T., 1970. Present status of pulping and papermaking
10- Healion, K. 2002. Wood as a Renewable Source of Energy, research with special reference to possible utilization of tropical
Socio-Economic Aspects of Forestry No. 1. hardwoods. In Proceedings of The Pan-Malaysian Forestry
11- White, H.R. 2007. Effect of Lignin content and Extractives on Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Higher Heating Value of Wood. Wood and Fiber Science,
Volume 19(4): 446-452. 18- Casey, J. (1980). Pulp and Paper Chemistry and Chemical
12- Ragland, K. W. Aerts D. J. 1991. Properties of Wood for Technology vol.1. 2nd ed. Interscience Publications, NY, 820 pp.
Combustion Analysis. Bioresource Technology 37 : 161-168.