Recommendations of The Tsunami Protection Committee: MARCH, 2005
Recommendations of The Tsunami Protection Committee: MARCH, 2005
Recommendations of The Tsunami Protection Committee: MARCH, 2005
TSUNAMI PROTECTION
COMMITTEE
MARCH, 2005
INTRODUCTION
CONCLUSION
INTRODUCTION
Japan has undergone many great tsunami disasters, and the scars left by tsunamis can be
found everywhere in the land and culture of the country like fingerprints and genes. The
measures that Japan has been taking to mitigate tsunami-induced damage are recognized as
being advanced in the international community.
There were many people, however, who were not fully aware of the horror of tsunami
because a great tsunami is a once-in-several generations occurrence.
Vivid photographs and video footages of the recent Indian Ocean tsunami have taught us
how dreadful and disastrous a tsunami could be. A number of important pieces of knowledge
have been gained and some important lessons have also been learned.
In view of lessons learned from the tsunami disaster, therefore, we have re-examined a
wide range of tsunami disaster mitigation measures that Japan has been taking.
In order to ensure safety from tsunami, it is necessary to take comprehensive measures over
a large area, knowing how disastrous a tsunami can be and identifying vulnerable places and
safety measures that can be taken. It is also important to regard tsunami protection efforts as a
continuous process beginning with prevention efforts and ending with restoration and
rehabilitation and use a strategic combination of structural measures and nonstructural
measures.
The basic policy for the coming years, therefore, is to try to implement an effective
combination of structural measures and nonstructural measures before and after tsunami,
instead of relying solely on structural measures to prevent disasters, in order to minimize
tsunami-induced damage.
In accordance with this policy, "minimizing human suffering" has been set as an urgent
goal and "minimizing damage and human suffering" as a medium to long range goal, and
targets and concrete measures to achieve them are described in this report.
The central government should be responsible for taking tsunami protection measures, but
damage and suffering cannot be minimized by the administrative authorities alone. Awareness
and actions of the public and people in all circles and at all levels are essential. It is our
sincere hope that the recommendations described in this report will help to start various forms
of cooperative efforts of the public and private sectors.
-1-
1. TSUNAMI PROTECTION MEASURES IN JAPAN: CURRENT STATE AND
PROBLEMS
Sitting practically on top of four tectonic plates, Japan is prone to large-scale ocean-trench
earthquakes. In fact, Japan has suffered major tsunami damage roughly once every 10 years.
Furthermore, only about 10 percent of the land of Japan can be used as residential land, and
population and industry are inevitably concentrated in alluvial plains and coastal areas. Even
in those dangerous areas, intensive and efficient use is made of available space including
underground space and highly urbanized cities have been constructed.
The imminence of ocean-trench earthquakes such as the Tokai, Tonankai and Nankai
earthquakes* has been pointed out for some time, and the occurrence of nearshore tsunamis
caused by those earthquakes has been predicted. There is also concern about a major tsunami
caused by a Cascadia earthquake†† expected in the North Pacific Coast or a Chilean
earthquake. A nearshore tsunami reaches a shore soon after an earthquake occurs and inflicts
secondary damage on earthquake-damaged areas.
Under these circumstances, the current state and problems of pre- and post-tsunami safety
measures are as follows.
1) * It has been pointed out that besides the Tokai, Tonankai and Nankai earthquakes, ocean-trench earthquakes along the
Nippon Trench and the Chishima Trench are also likely to occur.
2) † A Cascadia earthquake is a magnitude 8–9 earthquake that has occurred in the region along the Northwest Pacific Coast
mainly along the Canada–US boarder at recurrence intervals of 300–350 years. The last Cascadia earthquake occurred in
1700. It has been said for some time that another Cascadia earthquake is imminent.
-2-
(2) Current state and problems of preventive measures
(a) Inspection and performance evaluation of facilities that have a tsunami protection
function are inadequate. The target levels of the tsunami protection function are
inadequate.
(b) The seismic performance and gap-closing performance of 59 percent and 55 percent,
respectively, of the seawalls in important coastal zones‡ have not been checked.
(c) Even in important coastal zones, somewhere between 10 and 20 percent of all
municipalities have published their tsunami hazard maps.
(d) There should be more shelters and evacuation routes designed taking topography and
evacuation time into consideration.
(e) In areas where it is difficult to provide sufficient shelters because of relatively flat
topography, adequate consideration has not been given to the designation of buildings
that are to be used as tsunami shelters and requirements for such shelter buildings.
(f) Roads, railways and airports located near coastlines have not been inspected
adequately with respect to safety against the expected tsunami height.
(g) There are many facilities for storing hazardous and noxious substances (HNS) such as
LNG located in coastal areas. Many of these facilities are not protected from tsunami.
(h) Marine vessels sunk, stranded, broken or swept away and cargoes or other objects
washed away could impair port and harbor functions, cause water pollution, and
aggravate damage in the hinterland areas.
3) ‡ Important coastal zones are coastal areas that are likely to be affected by the Tokai, Tonankai and Nankai earthquakes
and ocean-trench earthquakes occurring along the Nippon Trench or the Chishima Trench (as of August, 2004, a total of
402 municipalities are located in important coastal zones).
-3-
(4) Current state and problems of accumulation and dissemination of tsunami protection
technology and knowledge
(a) Even in important coastal zones, about 20 percent of the municipalities do not
conduct tsunami response drills.
(b) There is no institutional system under which the causes of major disasters are
determined promptly and the findings are reflected in government actions.
(c) Neither administrators, researchers nor citizens can easily obtain information
regarding tsunami disaster prevention.
-4-
2. BASIC POLICY FOR TSUNAMI PROTECTION MEASURES IN THE COMING
YEARS
Tsunami protection measures in the past relied mainly on structural measures such as
seawalls designed to guard against a tsunami of an expected magnitude, and there was even
no policy for dealing with a tsunami of a greater magnitude.
In view of the current state and problems, the basic proposition in the coming years is to
enhance the level of safety as soon as possible despite the limitations in the amount of
investment and the response time requirements and strategically promote activities for
minimizing damage even in the event of a beyond-design-basis tsunami.
The magnitude of damage is determined by the level of tsunami risk reduction achieved by
means of structural measures such as seawalls and the level of effectiveness of nonstructural
functions such as the safety level of the social organization of the local community and the
inherent fire resistance and disaster tolerance of land use patterns.
Since, however, those measures are interrelated, their implementation requires close
coordination among the people concerned in view of the realities in the area. At the same time,
effort should be made to implement conventional, more or less standardized structural
measures in a manner suitable for the area.
Public awareness of the importance of tsunami preparedness is apt to fade because tsunami
is characterized by long recurrence intervals. "Self-help," "mutual assistance" and "public
assistance" are based on public awareness. Continued effort must be made, therefore, in the
areas of safety education, public relations and tsunami response drills.
-5-
3. SPECIFIC URGENT GOALS AND DAMAGE MITIGATION MEASURES
The first step in damage mitigation is to take urgently needed measures to "minimize
human suffering."
To this end, educational effort should be made make the residents of coastal areas and
tourists and other visitors in coastal areas aware that it is their duty in the spirit of "self-help"
and "mutual assistance" to escape to higher areas in the event of an earthquake.
In so doing, it is necessary to keep in mind that the level of understanding on the part of the
public at the receiving end of information and the level of functionality of facilities with a
tsunami protection function are deciding factors.
Therefore, with the aim of "minimizing human suffering" due to tsumanis induced by
ocean-trench earthquakes whose probability of occurrence is thought to be high such as the
Tokai, Tonankai and Nankai earthquakes, specific urgent measures that should be taken within
five years from now have been identified.
4) § Areas behind which there are facilities that are to perform crisis management functions such as relief and restoration (e.g.,
municipal government offices, police stations, fire stations, hospitals)
-7-
measures to prevent cargoes and small marine vessels from being swept away and
protect other marine vessels
• To provide guidance to passenger ship operators so as to ensure safety of passenger ships
in the event of a tsunami
4) Damage reduction through better land uses and better ways of living
• To recommend that developers incorporate damage mitigation measures into their
integrated development plans for coastal areas in order to create communities that are
highly resistant to tsunamis.
• To promote the application of the philosophy of damage mitigation to the siting, project
methods and usage of public facilities
• To conduct studies on the requirements for disaster-resistant communities in order to
reflect the findings in community planning and regional planning
-8-
• To select emergency heliports and share the information on such heliports
• To build a system for cooperating with NGOs
• To enhance the rescue and relief capability of helipcopters
(4) Accumulation and dissemination of technology and knowledge for tsunami disaster
prevention
-9-
4. MEDIUM TO LONG RANGE GOALS AND TSUNAMI PROTECTION
MEASURES
Humankind is destined to inherit tsunami risk from generation to generation. The best way
to mitigate tsunami damage, therefore, is to incorporate damage mitigation measures into land
uses and the way of living in each of future generations so that the philosophy of damage
mitigation is reflected in daily life.
In this country, which is not blessed with geographic conditions from the viewpoint of
tsunami disaster prevention, it is necessary to make consistent efforts to raise the level of
protection in areas where key community functions or key economic and social functions are
concentrated. At the same time, it is necessary to implement various measures making
effective use of every community planning and building construction opportunity in order to
prevent destructive damage even in the event of a beyond-design-basis tsunami.
Japan has entered an era of population decline, and it is predicted that the population of
Japan will begin to gradually decrease in about 20 to 30 years and the demographic
composition will change considerably. During the same period, sea level is expected to rise
because of global warming. In order to cope with these unprecedented changes in changes in
demography and natural conditions, it is necessary to accumulate and utilize scientific and
technological knowledge and take appropriate measures.
In any case, a new policy is essential, and various institutional systems need to be
constructed with the understanding of the public.
In accordance with these requirements and taking into consideration the expected changes
in demography and natural conditions, medium to long range measures that should be taken
over a period of about 20 years have been identified with the aim of "minimizing
tsunami-induced damage and suffering including property damage."
(1) Medium to long range tsunami protection measures including emergency measures
-10-
2) Preventive measures
• To construct shelters and evacuation routes to help to eliminate difficult-to-evacuate
areas
• To perform the seismic retrofit of coastal conservation facilities, construct seawalls and
breakwaters, and perform the automation and remote control implementation of water
gates at openings, on an as-needed basis, mainly in important coastal zones
• The managers of the facilities located near coasts will take necessary measures.
• To promote the formulation of land use plans (municipal plans) that give consideration
to disaster prevention
3) Post-tsunami measures
• To construct systems for urgent removal of obstacles such as sunken ships in port areas
throughout the country
• To construct facilities that can be used as disaster prevention bases in the areas where
such facilities are necessary
• To establish the technology and support systems for equipment for disaster response
operations such as debris removal
-11-
CONCLUSION
The recommendations described in this document are the first of their kind to deal
specifically with tsunami protection measures. It is significant that the Tsunami Protection
Committee deliberated on the varied themes falling into the categories normally covered by
the National Land Development Council, the Infrastructure Development Council and the
Council for Transport Policy, addressed short- and long-range policies under a clearly defined
strategy, and has come up with a wide-ranging set of concrete measures to be taken.
Whether or not these recommendations will have historical value is solely dependent on the
efforts of not only the government but also the public and the various circles at various levels.
Needless to say, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MLIT) should promptly
set out to implement the recommended measures that fall into the categories for which the
ministry is directly responsible. In addition, MLIT should also present the other measures to
the local public bodies concerned. Furthermore, MLIT should ask the local public bodies to
report on the measures they have implemented or the measures they intend to implement, and
should collect the reports and present the results to the public.
-12-
Members of the Tsunami Protection Committee
Tsunami
Fumihiko Imamura, Professor, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University
Local government
Mitsuhisa Ito, Mayor, Owase City, Mie Prefecture
Disaster Prevention
Yoshiaki Kawata (Chairman), Professor, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto
University
Transportation
Katsuhiko Kuroda, Professor of Engineering, Kobe University (Chairman, Port Transportation
Subcommittee)
Law
Tsuyoshi Nishitani, Professor, Law School, Kokugakuin University (Chairman, River
Subcommittee, Infrastructure Development Council)
Housing
Tsuneo Okada, Professor Emeritus, The University of Tokyo; President, Japan Building
Disaster Prevention Association (Chairman, Building Subcommittee,
Infrastructure Development Council)
Local government
Kazuo Ozawa, Mayor, Kamaishi City, Iwate Prefecture
Coasts
Shinji Sato, Professor, Graduate School of Engineering
Maritime safety
Masaru Takahashi, Professor, Maritime Safety Technology, Japan Coast Guard Academy
Information
Atsushi Tanaka, Professor, Faculty of Sociology, Toyo University
Meteorology
Koji Yamamoto, Chairman, HALEX Corporation (former Director-General of the Japan
Meteorological Agency)
Media
Noboru Yamazaki, Commentator, Japan Broadcasting Corporation (NHK)
(Arranged alphabetically)
-13-