Foaming of Pure Aluminium by Tih: R. Soltani, Z. Sarajan and M. Soltani
Foaming of Pure Aluminium by Tih: R. Soltani, Z. Sarajan and M. Soltani
Foaming of Pure Aluminium by Tih: R. Soltani, Z. Sarajan and M. Soltani
alloy foams manufactured by accumulative roll bonding Ø50 mm) as the blowing agent. When the stirring torque
processes.18 The main goal of this study is to investigate of the melt reaches 0?29 Nm, the titanium hydride
the influences of titanium hydride content as a foaming powder (0?5–2?0 wt-%) is added and dispersed into the
agent on porosity percentage, size and cell structure melt. Two minutes after the impeller stirring reaches the
uniformity of the foamed pure aluminium. Mechanical speed of 1400 rev min21, titanium hydride powder acts
properties like strength and hardness value and hardness as a foaming agent and the melt is gradually foamed.
uniformity throughout the length with respect to the Melts are held in the furnace at 550uC to allow the
porosity are important and need further study and are blowing agent to completely decompose. In this stage,
beyond the scope of this work. bubbles in the melt continuously grow with time and a
melt with a cellular structure is formed. The liquid metal
was stirred under a hot argon atmosphere at ,100uC
Experimental and a maximum flow of 2460 cm3 min21. Argon was
This study is based on an experimental procedure and directly injected inside the melt to control the oxidation
consists of five stages. The first step is melting 1 kg of during the foaming process. This controlled atmosphere
this alloy in Al2O3 coated steel crucible under argon decreases magnesium loss to the minimum. This time
atmosphere. Liquidus temperature of the pure alumi- interval is defined as holding foaming stage whose
nium used in this study is 642uC. The liquidus duration is defined as holding time. Finally, the crucible
temperature of this alloy was calculated by Pro-Cast is removed from the furnace and the foamed melt is
software based on chemical composition. The chemical cooled in air, and in the end, solidification occurs. The
composition of the material before and after addition of experimental set-up is shown in Fig. 1.
titanium hydride is shown in Table 1. The second step is
the addition of aluminium powder (5 wt-%, the purity of
Al .99?9 wt-% with 60 mm in diameter) as the adjuster
Results and discussion
into the melt by the impellor with a constant stirring Porosity content as a function of holding temperature
speed of 550 rev min21 to raise the viscosity of the melt. shows that optimum temperature is between 620 and
The viscosity of the aluminium melt was measured by 660uC. The vertical cross-section of foamed aluminium
monitoring the torque moment of the paddle axle. To samples at different holding temperature is shown in
improve the dispersion of the foaming agent in the base Fig. 2. This figure exhibits cell structure variations in
metal and to improve the consistency of the foam, foamed aluminium and shows that at the different
mechanical stirring was instituted. This was accom- temperatures, pore size has been varied; also, there are
plished using as a stirrer a disc of stainless steel, 2 inches few bubble zones at the bottom. Figure 2a and d shows
in diameter, cut at the radius in four or five places with foamed aluminium cell structure at the holding tem-
the blades bent so that they formed a multibladed fan. perature of 620 and 660uC. There is a non-uniform cell
The stirring unit was mounted at the end of an 18 in structure in these products. It is explained by TiH2
long, 3/8 in diameter rod driven by the stirrer motor decomposition into titanium and hydrogen at this range
operating at 400–1600 rev min21. The next step is the of temperature. As the temperature exceeds the favourite
addition of titanium hydride powder (purity .98 wt-%, holding temperature, equilibrium hydrogen pressure
Fe Zn CU Mn Ni Ti Cr Sn Pb
Before addition 0.001 0.012 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.100 0.001 0.001 0.001
After addition 0.001 0.002 0.09 0.001 0.001 0.136 0.001 0.001 0.011
increases.16–19,21 Sufficient foaming kinetics occurs, and centre of pure Al, though the remaining small pores of
hydrogen releasing is accelerated, which causes bubble ,3 mm are dispersed uniformly around them. The
coalescence very rapidly. The final bubble size and total recycled Al alloy foam has fine cell and shows uniform
porosity volume are directly related to hydrogen gas cell structures. This is because recycled Al alloy melt
content in the melt due to titanium hydride decomposi- possesses lower melting point and higher viscosity. High
tion and growth rate between bubble and liquid/solid decomposition rate of titanium hydride is not desired,
interface. Rapid solidification causes non-uniform irre- because the excess gas released from the melt leads to
gularly shaped porosity cell structure. production of unstable liquid foam. In another point of
The foaming tests are shown in Fig. 3. The specimen view, low holding temperature causes insufficient gas
heights increased to over eight times more for pure Al releasing required for foaming process. Finer porosity
than that of the original column height. The porosity cell structure and the presence of continuous aluminium
including skins of the foamed columns was evaluated solid phase are probably due to insufficient hydrogen
by Archimedes’ principle to be 0?92, 0?90 and 051 content in the melt. Therefore, the appropriate holding
respectively. A few larger pores of 4–5 mm exist at the temperature of the melt is in the range of 640–650uC.
Figure 4 shows the influence of TiH2 addition on the porosity cell structure distribution. As it is shown in
porosity cell structure of the foamed aluminium samples. Fig. 4d, TiH2 addition of 2?5 wt-% induced non-uniform
A comparison of the cell structure indicates that TiH2 porosity cell structure but released hydrogen gas was
addition of 0?5 wt-% creates a bubble free zone at the completely absorbed by the melt and largely increased the
bottom of the sample.20–22 TiH2 addition not only affects foamed aluminium volume. However, the maximum
the hydrogen content and porosity volume but also extent of the volume is limited. Figure 5 shows the
determines the melt viscosity. The neighbouring bubbles relationship between the porosity of the foamed alumi-
in the liquid foam are separated by thin liquid film. nium and TiH2 content at the holding temperature of
By the presence of sufficient hydrogen content and 640uC.
desired melt viscosity, liquid surface tension minimises Insight into the process is provided by observations of
the flow of this thin liquid film in the mentioned an expanding foam in an open tube, 160 mm in diameter.
interface.23–27 It indicates that the TiH2 addition of During foam expansion, the top surface is convex, bowed
0?5 wt-% is insufficient. Non-uniform irregular porosity in the shape of an arc because of the decomposing
cell structure is shown in Fig. 4a. TiH2 addition of 1?0– blowing agent. Figure 6 shows a time sequence of the
1?5 wt-% induced a wide range uniformity of spherical surface of an expanding aluminium foam. To mark a
reference location on the surface, a stud was inserted at
the centre of the top surface, and the position of the stud
is marked by arrows in the figure. During expansion, the
stud moved ,40 mm from the centre to the side, over a
period of 100 s. This displacement was caused by the
emergence of fresh surface from beneath the top surface,
which pushed the extant surface to the side of the crucible
as the foam expanded. Meanwhile, the height of the
sample expanded from 160 to 190 mm. The new surface
area was created by expansion of surface cells and the
creation of new surface by migration of cells to the old
surface.28
The porosity of foamed aluminium with TiH2 addition
of 1?0 wt-% has been remarkably increased. Figure 7
shows SEM image of fractured surface of the foamed
5 Porosity percentage as function of titanium hydride aluminium with 1?5 wt-% of titanium hydride. As it
wt-% in foamed aluminium shows, medium thickness of thin cell wall is ,20 mm,
7 SEM fracture view of foamed aluminum with a 1?5 wt% of titanium hydride; b 1 wt% of titanium hydride9
which has been easily broken under loading and 3. With an increase in the stirring period, the number
eventually will be vanished. These thin cell walls are of pores is increased, but the size of pores is decreased.
caused by the excessive foaming. These experimental 4. At the holding temperature of 640uC, TiH2
results indicate that the optimum content of TiH2 and decomposes into titanium and hydrogen. The bubble
more hydrogen gas releasing increases the porosity size and porosity volume are directly related to
volume and foaming efficiency. As hydrogen gas releasing hydrogen gas content and growth rate between bubble
is increased, its escaping through the melt increases and and liquid/solid interface.
may result in decreased foaming efficiency. Therefore, the 5. Rapid solidification releases excess gas and causes
optimum amount of titanium hydride content is 1?0 non-uniform irregularly shaped porosity cell structure.
wt-%, which induces uniformity in porosity cell structure Insufficient hydrogen content causes finer porosity cell
distribution in the whole cross-section of the foamed structure and continuous aluminium solid phase,
aluminium. whereas the sufficient content and the desired melt
viscosity minimise the flow of thin liquid film between
the neighbouring bubbles in the liquid foam.
Conclusions
The effect of thermal decomposition properties of Acknowledgement
titanium hydride on the alloy melt foaming behaviour
and the pore structures of pure aluminium was investi- The authors acknowledge Islamic Azad University
gated using the unidirectional solidification method. The Masjed Soleyman Branch of Microcast for the experi-
main results obtained from this study could be sum- mental work and the skilful technical advice.
marised as follows.
1. With the optimum torque of 0?3 Nm for the melt, References
titanium hydride powder acts as a foaming agent. 1. D. K. Balch, J. G. O’Dwyer and G. R. Davis: ‘Plasticity and
2. The existence of the aluminium powder in the melt damage in aluminum syntactic foams deformed under dynamic and
is necessary for the increase in viscosity. quasi-static conditions’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, A391, 408–417.
2. Z. Sarajan, M. Soltani and J. Kahani Khabushan: ‘Foaming of Al– 15. M. C. Gui, D. B. Wang, J. J. Wu, G. J. Yuan and C. G. Li:
Si by TiH2’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2011, 26, 1–6. ‘Deformation and damping behavior of foamed Al–Si–SiCp
3. A. G. Hanssen, O. S. Hopperstad, M. Langseth and H. Ilstad: composite’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, A286, 282–288.
‘Validation of constitutive models applicable to aluminium foams’, 16. J. Zhou and W. O. Soboyejo: ‘Mechanics modeling of the
Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2002, 44, 359–406. compressive stiffness and strength of open-celled aluminum foams’,
4. Z. Sarajan and M. Sedigh: ‘Influences of titanium hydride (TiH2) Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2004, 19, 863–882.
content and holding temperature in foamed pure aluminum’, 17. A. Kim and I. Kim: ‘Effect of specimen aspect ratio on fatigue of
Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2009, 24, 590–593. closed cell Al–Si–Ca alloy foam’, Acta Mech. Solid. Sinica, 2008,
5. E. Amsterdam, J. T. M. De Hosson and P. R. Onck: ‘Failure 21, 4–10.
mechanisms of closed-cell aluminum foam under monotonic and 18. D. Lehmhus and J. Banhart: ‘Properties of heat-treated aluminium
cyclic loading’, Acta Mater., 2006, 54, 4465–4472. foams’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2003, A349, 98–110.
6. P. Lorenzo, A. Massimiliano and P. Marco: ‘The mechanical 19. Y. Mu, G. Yao and H. Luo: ‘Effect of cell shape anisotropy on the
behaviour of aluminium foam structures in different loading compressive behavior of closed-cell aluminum foams’, Mater. Des.,
conditions’, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2008, 35, 644–658. 2010, 31, 1567–1569.
7. S. Nemat-Nasser, W. J. Kang, J. D. McGee, W. G. Guo and J. B. 20. L. E. G. Cambronero, I. Cañadas, D. Martı́nez and J. M. Ruiz-
Isaacs: ‘Experimental investigation of energy-absorption character- Román: ‘Foaming of aluminium–silicon alloy using concentrated
solar energy’, Sol. Energy, 2010, 84, 879–887.
istics of components of sandwich structures’, Int. J. Impact Eng.,
21. A. R. Kennedy: ‘The effect of TiH2 heat treatment on gas release
2007, 34, 1119–1146.
and foaming in Al–TiH2 preforms’, Scr. Mater., 2002, 47, 763–767.
8. M. C. Gui, D. B. Wang, J. J. Wu, G. J. Yuan and C. G. Li:
22. Y. Matsumoto, A. H. Brothers, S. R. Stock and D. C. Dunand:
‘Deformation and damping behaviors of foamed Al–Si–SiCp
‘Uniform and graded chemical milling of aluminum foams’, Mater.
composite’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, A286, 282–288.
Sci. Eng. A, 2007, A447, 150–157.
9. B. Matijasevic and J. Banhart: ‘Improvement of aluminium foam
23. A. Kim, M. A. Hasan, S. H. Nahm and S. S. Cho: ‘Evaluation of
technology by tailoring of blowing agent’, Scr. Mater., 2006, 54,
compressive mechanical properties of Al-foams using electrical
503–508. conductivity’, Compos. Struct., 2005, 71, 191–198.
10. S. M. Oak, B. J. Kim, W. T. Kim, M. S. Chun and Y. H. Moon: 24. Z. Wang, Z. Li, J. Ning and L. Zhao: ‘Effect of heat treatments on
‘Physical modeling of bubble generation in foamed-aluminum’, J. the crushing behaviour and energy absorbing performance of
Mater. Process. Technol., 2002, 130–131, 304–309. aluminium alloy foams’, Mater. Des., 2009, 30, 977–982.
11. E. Koza, M. Leonowicz, S. Wojciechowski and F. Simancik: 25. Y. Mu and G. Yao: ‘Anisotropic compressive behavior of closed-
‘Compressive strength of aluminium foams’, Mater. Lett., 2003, 58, cell Al–Si alloy foams’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, A527, 1117–1119.
132–135. 26. F. C. Robles Hernandez, M. B. Djurdjevic, W. T. Kierkus and J.
12. C. Motz and R. Pippan: ‘Deformation behavior of closed-cell H. Sokolowski: ‘Calculation of the liquidus temperature for hypo
aluminum foams in tension’, Acta Mater., 2001, 49, 2463– and hypereutectic aluminum silicon alloys’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A,
2470. 2005, A396, 271–276.
13. C. C. Yang and H. Nakae: ‘The effects of viscosity and cooling 27. C. C. Yang and H. Nakae: ‘The effects of viscosity and cooling
conditions on the foam ability of aluminum alloy’, J. Mater. conditions on the foamability of aluminum alloy’, J. Mater.
Process. Technol., 2003, 141, 202–206. Process. Technol., 2003, 141, 202–206.
14. L. B. Hussain and I. A. Ali Hakim: ‘Recycling and formulation of 28. S. Han Park, Y. Um, C. Kum and B. Y. Hur: ‘Thermophysical
aluminum scrap via mass balance die casting and forming’, Mater. properties of Al and Mg alloys for metal foam fabrication’,
Manuf. Processes, 2007, 22, 916–921. Colloids Surf. A, 2005, 263A, 280–283.