Introduction To The Philosophy of The Human Person
Introduction To The Philosophy of The Human Person
Introduction To The Philosophy of The Human Person
Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: No copyright shall subsist in any work of
the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency or office
wherein the work is created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit. Such
agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the payment of royalties.
Borrowed materials (i.e., songs, stories, poems, pictures, photos, brand names,
trademarks, etc.) included in this module are owned by their respective copyright holders.
Every effort has been exerted to locate and seek permission to use these materials from their
respective copyright owners. The publisher and authors do not represent nor claim ownership
over them.
Management Team:
Schools Division Superintendent : Romeo M. Alip, PhD, CESO V
OIC-Asst. Schools Division Superintendent : William Roderick R. Fallorin
Chief Education Supervisor, CID : Milagros M. Peñaflor, PhD
Education Program Supervisor, LRMDS : Edgar E. Garcia, MITE
Education Program Supervisor, AP/ADM : Romeo M. Layug
Education Program Supervisor, AP : Romeo M. Layug
District Supervisor, Orani : Arlene S. Carlos
Division Lead Book Designer : Kenneth G. Doctolero
District LRMDS Coordinator, Orani : Hilda D. Sayson
School LRMDS Coordinator : Michelle B. Cruz
School Principal : Arlene M. Matilde
District Lead Layout Artist, Intro to Philo : Aldrine Y. Teleron
District Lead Illustrator, Intro to Philo : Mae Laine C. Villaruel
District Lead Evaluator, Intro to Philo :
educators both from public and private institutions to assist you, the teacher or
facilitator in helping the learners meet the standards set by the K to 12 Curriculum
This learning resource hopes to engage the learners into guided and
independent learning activities at their own pace and time. Furthermore, this also
aims to help learners acquire the needed 21st century skills while taking into
In addition to the material in the main text, you will also see this box in the
As a facilitator you are expected to orient the learners on how to use this
module. You also need to keep track of the learners' progress while allowing them to
manage their own learning. Furthermore, you are expected to encourage and assist
1
For the learner:
The hand is one of the most symbolized part of the human body. It is often
used to depict skill, action and purpose. Through our hands we may learn, create
and accomplish. Hence, the hand in this learning resource signifies that you as a
learner is capable and empowered to successfully achieve the relevant competencies
and skills at your own pace and time. Your academic success lies in your own hands!
This module was designed to provide you with fun and meaningful
opportunities for guided and independent learning at your own pace and time. You
will be enabled to process the contents of the learning resource while being an active
learner.
What I Need to Know This will give you an idea of the skills or
competencies you are expected to learn in the
module.
2
Assessment This is a task which aims to evaluate your
level of mastery in achieving the learning
competency.
1. Use the module with care. Do not put unnecessary mark/s on any part of the
module. Use a separate sheet of paper in answering the exercises.
2. Don’t forget to answer What I Know before moving on to the other activities
included in the module.
3. Read the instruction carefully before doing each task.
4. Observe honesty and integrity in doing the tasks and checking your answers.
5. Finish the task at hand before proceeding to the next.
6. Return this module to your teacher/facilitator once you are through with it.
If you encounter any difficulty in answering the tasks in this module, do not
hesitate to consult your teacher or facilitator. Always bear in mind that you are not
alone.
We hope that through this material, you will experience meaningful learning and
gain deep understanding of the relevant competencies. You can do it!
3
What I Need to Know
Philosophy as we define it is the study of all things with their ultimate cause
under the light of reason. Many of us are not acquainted to it. In fact, when hear this
discipline, we are often nervous and afraid of it. Philosophy is not an abstract concept
out in the air. Philosophy is with us every day. We cannot negate its existence
because we just opt to do so.
This module was initiated, conceptualized and written to help you better
understand the ways of Doing Philosophy. This will guide you to see the many
aspects that Philosophy must do to your life. By such, you will see that life cannot
simply done the way want it to be. We will realize that by knowing and understanding
the many things and aspects of doing such is beneficial to you.
4
What I Know
__________________2. It is the study of all things with their ultimate causes under the
light of reason.
_________________14. He said that “the more we know, the more we do not know”.
5
Lesson
Philosophy as we understood on our first lesson is the study of all things with
their ultimate causes under the light of reason. By this, we can say that Philosophy
is inseparable from the human activities.
One may ask: “Are there ways of doing Philosophy?” or “Is Philosophy relevant
to one’s life?” The answer is YES! There are methods or ways of doing Philosophy by
which one can use in his/her everyday life.
What’s In
Directions: Examine the following statements. Can you tell if such statement is true
or not? Put a check (/) if the statement is true; (X) if the statement is misleading.
Write the answers on your notebook.
6
________________9. Cats are not good pets.
1. In the statements you considered as true, what made you say that they are
true?
2. Do you think that identifying if something is true or not is important? Why?
Why Not?
3. Can you justify that the statements that you consider to be true, must also be
true to all people ?
7
Notes to the Teacher
This module will give the learners an understanding ways of doing
philosophy in able to distinguish opinion from truth that will lead
to wisdom and truth.
What’s New
The “Allegory of the Cave” was conceived by Plato about the way human beings
perceive things and the world around us. He claimed knowledge that is acquired
merely through our senses is not real knowledge at all. It is through philosophical
reasoning where we gain true knowledge.
Directions: Carefully look at the image below and read the story on the next page.
Answer the questions that follow. Write the answers on your notebook.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8d/An_Illustration_of_The_Allegory_of_the_Cave%2C_from_Plato%E2%80%
99s_Republic.jpg/800px-An_Illustration_of_The_Allegory_of_the_Cave%2C_from_Plato%E2%80%99s_Republic.jpg
8
ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE
A summary by Amy Trumpeter
The Cave
The Shadows
• So, imagine that you are one of the prisoners. You cannot look at
anything behind or to the side of you – you must look at the wall in
front of you.
• When people walk along the walkway, you can see shadows of the
objects they are carrying cast on to the wall.
• If you had never seen the real objects ever before, you would believe
that the shadows of objects were ‘real.
The Game
The Escape
• One of the prisoners then escapes from their bindings and leaves
the cave.
• He is shocked at the world he discovers outside the cave and does
not believe it can be real.
• As he becomes used to his new surroundings, he realizes that his
former view of reality was wrong.
• He begins to understand his new world, and sees that the Sun is the
source of life and goes on an intellectual journey where he
discovers beauty and meaning
• He sees that his former life, and the guessing game they played is
useless.
The Return
https://www.philosophyzer.com/the-allegory-of-the-cave-by-plato-summary-and-meaning/
9
QUESTIONS:
1. Describe how the people in the cave are situated in Plato's allegory. What is the
only thing they are capable of seeing?
2. What do these prisoners trapped in the cavern believe is real or true?
3. According to Plato, how would the people in the cave react to an escapee who tried
to explain the truth to them,
4. In your own understanding, what is Truth?
5. Do you agree that “the truth will set you free” ?
10
What is It
As a Senior High School Student, Plato’s Allegory of the Cave will be helpful to
in your personal journey in finding the truth. Nowadays, you are bombarded with
information from different sources around you and these information would cause
confusions and conflict within you just like in the Allegory of the Cave.
Plato believes that not all that we see is true. For him, those things are just
mere representation of things. In practical sense, not because you see that Pedro is
smiling at you necessarily mean that he is a good person and he is good to you. You
just don’t know exactly his real sentiment towards you. Another example, suppose
you saw a piece of an apple, reddish and looks sweet and nutritious, but actually, it
is just made of styrofoam and was just painted with red paint so that it will look
exactly like that of the real apple. So what will you do if your classmates would tell
you that it is a real apple and you should eat it? Of course, as a thinking person, you
must see to it that what you are seeing, hearing, tasting, feeling and smelling must
be real, in such a way that your senses would tell you so. You must not simply believe
something to be true or not because your friends tell you so. Plato wants you to do
whatever it takes, even if it results to an argument with your friends just to prove
that the apple is not real and that is made from styrofoam that is painted red and it
cannot be eaten just because it looks like the real one. In your daily experiences,
many would go against you or argue with you because you insisting on sticking to
the truth because you have verified it using your senses and intellect, but that is
what Plato is saying. Finding the truth and sticking to it no matter what happens,
that is the challenge!
Maybe, you have already heard the notion about the “New Normal” brought
about by the pandemic COVID-19. Since all of us went through the Enhanced
Community Quarantine that led us to be locked down in our homes, most of us used
the Social Media platforms to avoid boredom and monotony of our daily activities. By
such, we have gathered a lot of information. Lots of them! Consequently, because of
this, we have been wondering and pondering if those information are all true.
Knowing the truth is like winning E-Games such as ML, LOL, ROS etc.
because we have realized and reached our goal and that is, being informed in the
right path to its truest sense.
11
For sure, there are mind-boggling questions you are constantly asking
yourself, and that is a good sign that you are on the right track! “But, what is the
truth?” “How do I know if something is true or not?” “Are there any rules to determine
if something is true or not?” Such questions are valid and logical. In this lesson, let
us try to answer those questions, philosophically! For this reason, we might say that
in searching for the truth, you are already philosophizing. Searching for the truth is
what prompted Philosophers to philosophize in the first place.
Logic came from the Greek word “Logike” which pertains to art of reasoning.
It is also a science since it deals with the systematic process of reasoning in order to
arrive at something. Logic helps us to understand why things arrived into such.
There are laws to be considered and followed so that we can be assured that we are
guided on the right track. Philosophy and Logic are inseparable. We explain things
using logic. As a rational being, we cannot simply accept and understand things just
because we got accustomed to it. One would ask, what if there is a person who did
not come to school and do not know the laws of logic, can he still be a logical person?
Of course! Our mind is always directed to the logical order of things. It is innate to
us as human persons.
G
L
A
S
S https://images.app.goo.gl/9rJtxag8jeuWpiVN9
https://www.maxpixel.net/static/p
hoto/1x/Tableware-Faceted-
Glass-Transparent-3540133.png
12
You might say now that truth differs from the way people think. What is true
to me, may not be true to you. Not at all! Truth is a universal idea about something
that exists based on logic. The idea presented about the idea of a glass may be best
understood by being specific, isn’t it? If the word to be defined is specific, then you
will arrive at the truth per se. But you might argue that it is not always the case. The
word “glass”, for example, can be purely understood as a vessel used for drinking. In
that case, we can call it as common sense. Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines
common sense as a sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of
the situation or facts. Supposing that you, as a simple teenager, have the power to
give life to a dead lion by which you believe that such creature is ferocious and
savage, would you do it or not? Of course, you will not, because if you do, you’ll be
dead. So, is common sense always reliable? Is it a process of philosophizing too?
Common sense leads us to judge wisely, not because there are rules, it simply
means that such is logical and valid. The human mind will always come to a point
wherein it will always do what is sound and valid
You can probably say that “because we have knowledge about something, we
are able to form our personal opinions and arguments regarding such things.
Because one cannot argue about something he or she does not know. As senior high
school student, perhaps you have already encountered the words argument and
opinion. In your classes, most of the time, you are being engaged in debates,
discourses or in “fliptops.” Young people are fond of this. Such is a good sign that
you are intellectually maturing. One would ask, “Do opinions and arguments
matter?” Of course! Our constitution guarantees us of our opinion and we are entitled
to it. We argue, not for the sake of lambasting other people. We do it because we
want to prove a point.
So, what are opinions and arguments? Opinions are basically the product of
our own belief and self-expression about something. To say that your mother is the
best mother in the world does not mean that you are wrong. It is merely an expression
of oneself because your belief is being validated by your experiences of your mother.
13
However, not all arguments/statements are truthful. Sometimes, we will
encounter faulty arguments that do not lead us to the truth. So, how do we confirm
an argument’s truthfulness? In Philosophy, we can use various ways to validate the
truthfulness of a statement/argument. Let us try to examine this example:
What have you noticed about the given statements? Are they valid and logical?
Why? Why not? Yes, you are right! Not all “beings” that have legs can be considered
as living. We have to understand that the term “leg” cannot be equated with the “leg”
that animals and humans have. Moreover, simply using the word “all” does not
guarantee that the argument is sound and valid.
Have you encountered such arguments that may seem valid and logical at first
but are actually invalid and illogical? These types of statements are called fallacies.
They are defined as statements which are misleading and erroneous. We tend to
commit fallacies because our arguments are crafted and stated in a wrong way. Below
are some examples of informal fallacies.
14
FALLACIES
15
Ad Baculum - Applying force/position to escape from answering the argument
directed towards him/her.
Example: The boss is always right since he is the one who pays the salary of
the employees.
16
Post Hoc - Determining and argument using false cause and effect between
different events.
Example: A spoon fell from the dining table, therefore, we must expect a lady
guest.
17
False Analogy - Comparing two similar terms/ ideas but has wrongful usage/
meaning.
Example: Our santol tree has a bark. My dog barks, therefore, the santol tree
also barks.
Fallacy of Composition - One thinks that what is true to a part is true to the
whole.
Example: Hydrogen is not wet and Oxygen is not wet, therefore, water (H2O)
is not wet.
18
Fallacy of Division - One thinks that what is true to the whole is true to a
part.
Example: America is the wealthiest nation on earth, so George (an American)
must be rich.
19
Petitio Principii/ Begging the Question - It is a fallacy that treats matters
under debate as already established and assumes that the thing or idea to
be proven is true.
Example: “ I have a right to free speech, therefore you cannot stop me from
talking.”
Now that you have been give examples of these kinds of fallacies, you are now
more than ready to spot faulty reasonings and illogical statements from people
around you. This brings you one step closer to the truth, being able to tell whether
a statement is valid or not, logical or not, truth or opinion. Ultimately, being able to
recognize fallacious statements leads to truth and wisdom.
Congratulations on finishing your 2nd Module! Are you ready for the activities? Let’s go!
20
What’s More
Directions: Write the correct answer being pertained to in the following statements.
Choose your answers from the pool of words below. Write your answers on your
notebook.
Knowledge Belief
Fallacy Truth
Common sense Opinion
21
What I Have Learned
In this lesson YOU have learned that Truth is defined as something which can
be proven, justified using one’s faculties or senses that follows the order of logic
which is factual and valid under the normal human reason.
We also learned that Logic is the science and art of correct and valid
reasoning. Without it, truth cannot be driven out or determined easily. Moreover, we
have also learned that not all things/ phenomena can be understood without the
rigid laws of logic and that is Common sense. It is a sound and prudent judgment
based on a simple perception of the situation or facts. (www.merriam-webster.com)
We also found out that opinions matter, but we have drawn a line between it
and the truth. Opinions are basically the product of our own belief and self-
expression about something. Arguments on the other hand are statements which
provides reason to persuade someone about your point is truthful.
Examples:
22
Dicto Simpliciter - assuming that something true in general is true in every
possible case
Fallacy of Composition - One thinks that what is true to a part is true to the
whole.
Fallacy of Division - One thinks that what is true to the whole is true to a part
Dicto Simpliciter - One is basing his argument out of an unqualified
generalization.
Petitio Principii/ Begging the Question - It is a fallacy that treats matters
under debate as already established and assumes that the thing or idea to be
proven is true.
23
What I Can Do
24
Assessment
A. Directions: Choose the letter that corresponds to the correct answer. Write your
answer on your notebook.
1. It is defined as the science and art of correct thinking and reasoning.
a. Metaphysics c. Epistemology
b. Ethics d. Logic
2. This is defined as erroneous and false reasoning.
a. Fallacy c. Principle of excluded middle
b. Highest principle d. Principle of non-contradiction
3. These are statements which provide reasons to persuade someone about
someone’s point is truthful.
a. Science c. Argument
b. Natural light of reason d. Highest principle
4. It refers to a prudent or sound judgement used to validate if a thing is valid
or not.
a. Sophia c. Lovia
b. Logike d. Common sense
5. It is something which we deem to understand or grasp fully.
a. Knowledge c. Principle of identity
b. Logic d. Principle of sufficient reason
________________2. Singing must be done so that our vocal cords are revitalized.
________________3. We should not vote for indigenous people since they are nomadic.
________________5. Cats are bad omens because whenever I see them, I meet
accidents.
25
Additional Activities
Directions: Write a brief essay on the following terms. Compose your essays on a
neat sheet of paper.
26
27
Assessment:
1. D
2. A
3. C
4. D
5. A
B.
1. HASTY GENERALIZATION
2. DICTO SIMPLICITER
3. AD HOMINEM
4. APPEAL TO PITY
5. POST HOC
6. AD POPULUM
7. AD HOMINEM
8. APPEAL TO PITY
9. POST HOC
10.APPEAL TO FORCE
11. DICTO SIMPLICITER
12 POST HOC
13. AD HOMINEM
14. AD POPULUM
15. PRINCIPIO PRINCIPII/ BEGGING THE
QUESTION
What I Know:
1. Greeks
What’s More: 2. Philosophy
3. Socrates
1. Fallacies X 5.
4. Plato
2. Opinions X 4.
5. Philein
3. Common / 3.
6. Logic
Sense X 2.
7. Inference
4. Truth X 1.
5. Knowledge 8. Being
What’s In: 9. Corporeal/
material
10. Spiritual/
immaterial
Answer Key
References
28
For inquiries or feedback, please write or call: