Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2K views

    Episode 8 The K To 12 Grading System: My Learning Episode Overview

    Uploaded by

    Blessildajoy Cruz
    The document discusses the grading system for the K to 12 curriculum in the Philippines. It provides details on how student grades are calculated based on written work, performance tasks, and quarterly assessments. The weights given to each component varies between grades 1-10 and 11-12, and also depends on the subject area. It also defines what is included in written work, performance tasks, and quarterly assessments. Sample computations are shown to demonstrate how grades are calculated in specific subjects.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Episode 8 The K To 12 Grading System: My Learning Episode Overview

    Uploaded by

    Blessildajoy Cruz
    2K views4 pages
    The document discusses the grading system for the K to 12 curriculum in the Philippines. It provides details on how student grades are calculated based on written work, performance tasks, and quarterly assessments. The weights given to each component varies between grades 1-10 and 11-12, and also depends on the subject area. It also defines what is included in written work, performance tasks, and quarterly assessments. Sample computations are shown to demonstrate how grades are calculated in specific subjects.

    Original Title

    FS-5-EPISODE-8

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses the grading system for the K to 12 curriculum in the Philippines. It provides details on how student grades are calculated based on written work, performance tasks, and quarterly assessments. The weights given to each component varies between grades 1-10 and 11-12, and also depends on the subject area. It also defines what is included in written work, performance tasks, and quarterly assessments. Sample computations are shown to demonstrate how grades are calculated in specific subjects.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    2K views4 pages

    Episode 8 The K To 12 Grading System: My Learning Episode Overview

    Uploaded by

    Blessildajoy Cruz
    The document discusses the grading system for the K to 12 curriculum in the Philippines. It provides details on how student grades are calculated based on written work, performance tasks, and quarterly assessments. The weights given to each component varies between grades 1-10 and 11-12, and also depends on the subject area. It also defines what is included in written work, performance tasks, and quarterly assessments. Sample computations are shown to demonstrate how grades are calculated in specific subjects.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    Episode 8

    The K to 12 Grading System

    My Learning Episode Overview


    With the implementation of the Enhanced Basic Education Curriculum of 2013, more
    popularly known as K to 12, is a new grading system that is aligned to the new assessment policy
    of the Department of Education based on DepEd Memo 8, s. 2015. in this Episode, you will be
    made to observe how this is implemented in schools.

    My Learning Essentials
    In the K to 12 curriculum, a student’s grade is based on his/her written work,
    performance task and quarterly assessment.
    The weights of the components (written work, performances task and quarterly assessment) vary
    among groups of subjects from Grade 1 to 10 and from Grade 11 and 12. See Tables below:

    Weight of the components For Grades 1-10


    Components Languages/AP/EsP Science/Math MAPEH/EPP/TLE
    Written Work 40% 40% 20%
    1 - 10 Performance 40% 40% 60%
    Task
    Quarterly 20% 20% 20%
    Assessment

    Weight of the Components for Grades 11-12


    Academic Track Technical-Vocational and Livelihood
    (TVL/Sports/Arts and Design Track
    Core All Work
    Subject other Immersion/Research/Business All Work
    s subject Enterprise Simulation/Exhibit other Immersion/Research/Exhibit
    s Performance subjec Performance
    t
    Written 25% 25% 35% 20%
    Works
    Performanc 50% 45% 40% 60%
    11 e Task
    - Quarterly 25% 30% 25% 20%
    12 Assessment

    Components of Summative Assessment


    A. Written Work includes ‘’long quizzes and unit or long test. other written work may include
    essays, written reports, and other written output…’’ It is strongly recommended that items in
    long quizzes and tests be distributed across the cognitive process dimensions of Anderson and
    Krathwohl (2001)’’ – DepEd Oreder 8, s.2015.
    The written Work component ‘’ensures that students are able to express skills and
    concepts in written form.’’
    If you are looking for the application KPUP (knowledge, process, understanding and
    performance of DepO. 73, s.2012) This is it. In assessment, teacher sees to it that written tests are
    assess the cognitive processes of remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating
    and creating with emphasis on the higher dimensions.
    B. ‘’The Performance Task component allows learners to show what they know and are able to
    do in diverse ways. They may create or innovate products or do performance-based tasks.
    Performance-based task may include skills demonstration, group presentation, and work,
    multimedia presentations and research projects.’’ (DepED, Order 8, s.2015). It also includes
    written outputs.
    C. Quarterly Assessment measures student learning at the end of the quarter. These may be
    objective tests, performance-based assessment or a combination of both. (DepED, Order 8,
    s.2015).
    Reporting Learners Program
    DepEd Order 8, s.2015 sates:
    The summary of learner progress is shown quarterly to parents and guardians through
    parent-teacher conference, in which the report card is discussed. The Table below presents the
    grading scale with its corresponding descriptors and remarks.
    Grading Scale
    DESCRIPTOR GRADING SCALE REMARKS
    Outstanding 90-100 Passed
    Very Satisfactory 85-89 Passed
    Satisfactory 80-84 Passed
    Fairly Satisfactory 75-79 Passed
    Did Not Meet Expectation Below 79 Passed
    My Reflections
    In an era where the emphasis is self-directed learning, demonstration of knowledge,
    skills and values learned (outcomes-based education) do grades really matter?
    It is still but not like before that they really emphasize its importance. Now, the emphasis
    is on individual strength and abilities like based on performance and not in written
    exams.

    What are your thoughts about the reflection of core values of the Filipino child in
    the Report Card?
    For me, this is just for me. You cannot really measure if a child is Makatao, Makabansa,
    Makakalikasan, or Makadiyos, because you don’t see what they do outside of the
    classroom and that’s really hard to measure like what kind of assessment tools/task
    should you use?

    2. Points for Improvement


    To be fair, 50% on written and 50% on performance task is okay as long as a teacher is
    fair in scoring and gives opportunity to every pupil, I think any grading system would
    work.

    My Learning Portfolio
    Show sample computations of a grade and subject of your choice.

    Written Work Performance Task


    1 15/15 1 15/20
    2 20/20 2 13/15
    3 23/25 3 10/10
    4 13/15 38/45 = 0.84
    0.84 x 100 = 84%
    71/75 = 0.95
    0.95 x 100 = 95%

    Quarterly
    Assessment 57/60 = 0.95 x 100 = 95 %
    :

    95% x 0.25 = 23.7


    5
    84% x 0.50 = 42
    95% x 0.25 = 23.7
    5
    89.5
    0
    Transmuted Grade = 93 OUTSTANDIN
    G

    You might also like