Design and Analysis of An Inset Feed X-Band Microstrip Patch Antenna
Design and Analysis of An Inset Feed X-Band Microstrip Patch Antenna
Design and Analysis of An Inset Feed X-Band Microstrip Patch Antenna
Supervised by
Md. Ashraful Haque
Assistant Professor
Certification
This is to certify that the thesis entitled, “Design and Analysis of an Inset Feed X Band
Microstrip Patch Antenna” submitted by Md. Nahid Hasan, Ripon PK. & Md. Abrar
Mohasin in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Bachelor of Science
Degree in ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING at the Daffodil
International university, Ashulia is an authentic work carried out by him under my
supervision and guidance. To the best of my/our knowledge, the matter embodied in the
thesis has not been submitted to any other University/ Institute for the award of any degree or
diploma.
_____________________
Name: Md. Nahid Hasan
ID #: 172-33-4187
________________________
Name: Ripon PK.
ID #: 172-33-4174
_______________________
Md. Ashraful Haque
Assistant Professor
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Faculty of Science and Engineering
Daffodil International University.
____________________________
Dr. Mohammad Tawhidul Alam Chairman
Associate Professor
Department of EEE, DIU
____________________________
Mst. Shamima Hossain Internal Member
Lecturer
Department of EEE, DIU
____________________________
Mr. Asif Hassan Internal Member
Lecturer
Department of EEE, DIU
____________________________
Dr. M. Abdur Razzak External Member
Professor
Department of EEE, IUT
Our Parents
References…………………………………………………….…………59-60
LIST OF FIGURS
List of Tables
λ Wavelength
π Pie
f Frequency
c Speed of light
Γ Reflection coefficient
ρ Magnitude coefficient
R Resistance
L Inductance
C Capacitance
G Conductance
Z0 Impedance
εr Relative dielectric constant
Effective dielectric constant
tanδ Loss tangent
h Height
fr Resonant frequency
V0 Velocity of light
𝐿𝑒𝑓𝑓 Effective length
𝜑 Angle
W Width
I express our sincere gratitude and indebtedness to the thesis supervisor Md. Ashraful
Haque, for his initiative in this field of research, for his valuable guidance, encouragement
and affection for the successful completion of this work. His sincere sympathy and kind
attitude always encouraged us to carry out the present work firmly. I express our thankfulness
to Prof. Dr. Md. Shahid Ullah, Head of the Department of Electrical and Electronic
Engineering, DIU, Ashulia for providing us with best facilities in the Department and his
timely suggestions. I would also like to thank Md. Ashraful Haque, Assistant Professor,
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, DIU, Ashulia for his guidance and
suggestions in our work. I would also like to thank Ansys HFSS & CST Microwave Studio
Software for providing the simulation package.
Last but not least we would like to thank all my friends and well-wishers who were involved
directly or indirectly in successful completion of the present work.
Nahid Hasan
ID #:172-33-4187
Ripon PK.
ID #: 172-33-4174
Md Abrar Mohasin
ID#:172-33-4152
Newer microwave and millimeter-wave systems are in higher demand to satisfy emerging
communications difficulties in terms of size, bandwidth, and gain. As a result, antennas are
commonly utilized to meet satellite communication demands. Different applications are
accessible in different frequency ranges in satellite communication. Researchers are
constantly trying to enhance the bandwidth and gain for Microstrip Patch antennas (MPAs).
Using the Ansys HFSS and CST Studio Suite 3D EM simulation software a new optimized
MPA is designed. The proposed antenna is an inset feed partial ground MPA structure that
has resonance frequencies of 8.45 GHz, 9.95 GHz, and 13.17 GHz, with a bandwidth of 6.7
GHz. It operates at frequencies ranging from 7.9 GHz to 14.6 GHz covering the complete X-
band and lower portion of Ku band. The planned antenna is 23.8×28.2×1.6 mm3 in size, with
FR-4 Epoxy as the substrate which has a dielectric constant of 2.2 and loss tangent of 0.02.
The antenna can be used for terrestrial broadband, uplink and downlink of satellite, mobile-
satellite service, broadcasting satellite services, secure military communication, military
satellite communication, direct broadcast satellite TV relay, fixed satellite service, amateur
radio, weather monitoring , air traffic control, maritime vessel traffic control and radar
application.
1.1 Introduction
Wireless communication has become the fastest rising segment and even the most essential
technological portion in the telecommunication industry. In this modern era, it has become
so omnipresent in the communication field and unavoidable for our daily lives. Moreover,
wireless communication is a revolutionized way of doing almost everything even it gives us
easement and an unprecedented sense of mobility. However, a couple of centuries ago, long-
distance communications were so difficult and even it took additional time to reach. With the
expectation, long-distance communication became easier, such as optical communication. It
has been a vital portion of human lives for a couple of decades and even it is continuously
evolving. Later, in the recent modern history of communication, the electromagnetic (EM)
spectrum is used for the wireless communication system and it is continuously growing.
Nowadays, the wireless communication system is using as a vital part for many new
applications such as Arduino based home automation system, automated traffic and factories,
remote telemedicine service, robotic vehicles etc. In the wireless communication system, an
Antenna is the most essential part. An antenna is an array of conductor or electrical
component that is essential to transmit or receive an electromagnetic (EM) beam spectrum or
radio signal from the space circumfluent it. In transmission, the antenna terminal takes the
electric energy and then radiates the signal as an electromagnetic wave to the space
surrounding it. And then, the Antenna receives electromagnetic signals from all horizontal
directions or any specific direction. Especially, in the wireless communication system, the
antenna is used to establish a wireless connection between two or more devices. The
antenna's performance depends on some terms such as antenna gain, bandwidth, polarization,
radiation pattern, impedance. On the basis of electromagnetic wave wavelength and radiation
frequency, the antenna can operate for all kinds of application in the wireless communication
system such as mobile phone, GPS receiver, satellite, base station wireless local area
1.2 Background
The abstract idea of the Microstrip Patch Antenna (MPA) was first introduced by G.A.
Deschamps in the 1950s [1-3].After 20 years, the MPA concept was first practically
developed by Howell and Munson in the 1970s after the evolution of the printed circuit
board (PCB) technology [1-3].By the early 1980s, basic microstrip antenna elements and
arrays were fairly well known in terms of design and modelling, and developers were turning
their attentions to developing antenna performance features (e.g. bandwidth), and to increase
the application of MPA of the technology. Basically, the microstrip patch antenna consists of
two substrate, one of them is conducting patch (metallic patch on a thin, grounded dielectric
substrate) of any non-planar or planar geometry that is located on one side of the dielectric
substrate. And the second one is the ground plane on another side. The MPA has been widely
The area of research of MPA for designing and implementation is an ongoing process. For
getting desirable resonant frequencies of MPA modified configuration and various shapes
such as rectangular or triangular with a different dimension of length (L) can help. The
bandwidth of MPA strongly depends on the gap between the conducting patch and the
ground plane. A smaller gap between the conducting patch and the ground plane stores more
energy in the patch capacitance and inductance and radiates less. As a result, increases the
quality factor (Q) of the antenna, indicating a narrow radiation bandwidth. By increasing the
thickness of the dielectric substrate, Q can be reduced, but the problem is increasing the
thickness of the dielectric substrate reduced efficiency since the large portion of the input
power is dissipated in the resistor which takes away the available Power that can be radiated
by the antenna. It can also affect low power gain and the extra radiation from its junction and
junction feeds points. The resonant bandwidth and gain can be affected by the substrate
permittivity (εr) of the microstrip antenna [4]. It is really hard to get a standard antenna gain
and bandwidth characteristic in the same MPA[3].
Microstrip patch antennas are well known for their benefits, which include light weight, low
fabrication costs, mechanical robustness when placed on hard surfaces, and the capacity to
[18] Proposes an ultra-wideband and tri-band antenna for satellite applications in the C, X,
and Ku bands with a dimension of 1451.66 mm3. A modified rectangular radiating element
with a distorted ground plane makes up the ultra-wideband antenna, which has a bandwidth
of 5 to 16 GHz. The U-shaped slots in the radiating patch were used to generate a tri-band
frequency response that covered the C, X, and Ku bands independently. 4.9-7 GHz, 7.92-
11.08 GHz, and 11.85-15.94 GHz were the frequency ranges that were achieved. Across the
whole bandwidth, the antenna gain varied from 2.3 to 4.5 dBi. [15] Proposes a large Ku-band
microstrip patch antenna with a defective patch and ground with a patch size of 1311 0.035
mm3. Two semi-U shaped slots on the patch, three U shaped slots on the patch, and one
rectangular hole in the ground were added to improve the antenna's return loss and
bandwidth. The suggested antenna has a wide band frequency range of 15.27 to 16.51 GHz,
with a resonance frequency of 15.8 GHz, a VSWR ≤ 1.1, gain of 4.45 dB, and directivity of
5.17 dBi. In [19], a patch antenna with inverted U-slot and L-slot has been proposed for X, C,
and K-band applications, with seven resonant frequencies of 8.25 GHz, 9.7 GHz, 11.93 GHz,
14.19 GHz, 16.52 GHz, 18.7 GHz, and 20.75 GHz in the X, C, and K bands. The suggested
antenna had a volume of 49.4141.6 mm3 and a gain of 6.18 dBi. Using a folded-patch feed,
E-shaped patch, one shorting pin on the edge of the aperture, and an E-shaped edge to boost
the bandwidth, the suggested basic antenna has an impedance bandwidth of 92 percent in the
frequency range 3.94–10.65 GHz [20]. With the use of two shorting pins and a V-shaped-slot
The goal of this study is to improve the MPA characteristics' performance in the X band. The
goals are highlighted in the table below.
All of MPA's performance improvements have been made in the X and Ku band frequency
domain. The use of two different sorts of slots in MPA results in a significantly enhanced
result. Step-by-step strategies for achieving our desired outcomes have been outlined.
Step1: Defining the length (L) and width (W) of a simple rectangular microstrip patch
antenna with basic structure (W).
Step3: Modifying and Optimizing the widths and lengths of the inset slot and partial ground
for better results
Step4: To analysis the performance of all designed antenna individually in term of antenna
characteristic especially antenna gain, antenna return loss and antenna bandwidth.
Step5: Optimizing the widths and lengths of the inset slot and partial ground for better results
This thesis is divided into 5 main chapters and the reference section.
Chapter 1 discusses about the introduction, literature review, objectives and scope of the
thesis.
Chapter 2 explains brief literature studies of the microstrip antenna in order to get its basic
fundamentals. It also discusses the relevant literatures on designing wideband microstrip
patch antenna using slot.
Chapter 3 describes the design procedure of wideband high gain Microstrip patch antenna
using microstrip feed line technique. A series of antenna configuration with optimization has
Chapter 4 includes comparison between HFSS studio and CST, return loss graphs,
bandwidth for all individual antennas, average and vector current distribution, 2D and 3D
radiation patterns for the proposed single patch antenna. Gain of the various array
configurations has also been compared in this chapter. The simulation is done using HFSS
studio CST of rectangular microstrip patch antenna. A brief comparative study also has been
made between proposed antenna and other previously designed antennas in terms of various
antenna parameters.
Finally, Chapter 5 gives a conclusion of the work and scope for future work considerations.
An antenna is a device that converts electrical energy into electromagnetic (EM) energy like a
transducer (vice versa).For designing an antenna, some measurable parameters should be
considered to comprehend the strength and weakness of that device. An antenna has a
different kind of parameters to understand the good or bad antenna performance, and the
parameters depend on one another. Moreover, it should be confirmed that all the parameters
are more optimized for designing an antenna. For example, the return loss should be -10dB or
less and the VSWR should be 2 or less.
Although not an antenna parameter in and of itself, understanding antenna field regions is
essential for determining how far away from the antenna the antenna actually radiates. The
fields that surround an antenna are separated into three main areas:
The far field region is the most essential since they influence the antenna radiation pattern
and most of the other parameters. Antennas, on the other hand, is utilized to establish long-
An antenna, the two field components are present in the electric field and magnetic field
equations. Those are known as radiative fields and reactive fields. In the denominator of the
equation, there is usually a distance ‘r' of the order of two or higher in the reactive field
components. In the radiative component, there is a distance component with ‘r' of the first
order as well. As a result, the reactive component of the field dies as distance rises, but the
radiative component remains, which dies at a far greater distance than reactive fields. There
isn't much radiation available in the near field since the reactive field is stronger. However,
this distance, on the order of R< λ0 (Wavelength at the operating frequency), which is
measured in mm and cm at microwave frequencies, is too small for us to notice. As a result,
unless it is requested that it be done in the near field region, every parameter of an antenna is
discussed in the far field region because radiation only exists there.
Another antenna that radiates differently at different angles is the directional antenna.
Directive gain is the ratio of an antenna's radiation intensity at a specific angle to the average
radiation intensity in all directions. It's written as dBi.
2.1.4 Directivity:
A directional antenna always has a radiation angle where the intensity of the radiation is
higher than in all other directions. The directivity of an antenna is the directive gain of a
directional antenna in the direction of maximum radiation.
At least two types of losses are always connected with an antenna. One is due to an
impedance mismatch between the feed line and the antenna, while the other is due to an
impedance mismatch between the antenna and the free space. Another reason is that because
the antenna is a conductor, it suffers losses. As a result, the antenna will not be able to emit
the entire input power. The efficiency of an antenna is the ratio of its output power to its input
power.
Antenna gain is the antenna's directivity when the antenna efficiency is taken into account.
An antenna's directivity can be thought of as the ideal case, whereas gain is the real case. As a
result, if all of an antenna's input powers are radiated, the gain and directivity will be the
same. There will always be losses associated with antennas in the real world; gain is always
less than directivity.
There will always be some impedance mismatch between antenna and generator because it is
impossible to match the impedance perfectly. Because of the impedance mismatch, some of
the signal will be reflected back to the generator from the antenna. The waveguide contains
both the forward wave to the antenna and the reflected wave from the antenna. Inside the
waveguide, these two voltages combine to generate a 'Standing Wave'. There is a maximum
and a minimum for this wave. The Voltage Standing Wave Ratio is the ratio of the maximum
and minimum voltages inside the waveguide (VSWR).
Another measure that conveys information about impedance mismatch is return loss.
Although it provides the same information as VSWR, it is the most commonly used metric in
antenna literature to characterize impedance mismatch and resonance. The reflected power to
incident power ratio is known as the reflection coefficient. The following equation is used to
compute it:
When the antenna and line impedances are perfectly matched, the reflection coefficient is
zero, indicating that there is no reflection. Return loss is the decibel value of the reflection
coefficient. The following is the relationship between the Reflection Coefficient and the
VSWR:
Table 2.1 provides a comparative understanding of VSWR and Return Loss. The following
equation in decibels gives the return loss. To conform with the IEEE specification, the
negative sign ensures that the return loss value remains positive. The s11 parameter is the
minus value of the return loss.
The impedance presented by an antenna at its terminals, or the ratio of voltage to current at a
pair of terminals, is known as input impedance. Maximum power transfer is accomplished
when the transmission line and antenna input impedances are matched. If it is not matched,
the entire system efficiency will suffer. Because a reflected wave is formed at the antenna
terminal and travels back to the energy source, this is the case.
In order to ensure maximum energy transfer between transmission line and patch, the input
impedance for this parameter must match the transmission line's characteristics impedance. If
the input impedances are not equal, a reflected wave is formed at the antenna terminal and
returns to the energy source. The overall system efficiency is reduced as a result of energy
reflection. Only this lost efficiency will occur if the antenna is utilized to transmit or receive
energy.
Different types of bandwidths exist in antennas, depending on certain characteristics. The s11
parameter bandwidth refers to a range of frequencies where return loss is less than -10dB.
Radiation pattern bandwidth is defined as the range of frequencies throughout which the
radiation pattern remains consistent. Antenna bandwidth is defined as a frequency range in
which all antenna characteristics are within an acceptable range.
Microstrip antennas are one of the most common antenna types in the microwave frequency
range, and they're also common in the millimeter-wave frequency range [2, 5, 6]. Microstrip
antennas are typically too large to be practical below 1 GHz, and other forms of antennas,
The lightweight, conformability, and low cost of microstrip antennas make them appealing.
These antennas can be used with active devices and printed strip-line feed networks. In
antenna engineering, it is a relatively recent field. Since the mid-1950s, the radiation
properties of micro strip structures have been known. When conformal antennas were
required for missiles in the early 1970s, this type of antenna was developed. Microstrip
resonant patches, both rectangular and circular, have been widely used in a variety of array
topologies. The present revolution in electronic circuit downsizing brought about by
improvements in large scale integration is a major contributor to recent advances in
microstrip antennas. Microstrip antennas based on photolithographic technology are seen as
an engineering achievement because traditional antennas are frequently big and expensive
parts of an electronic system [7].
The patch is often square, rectangular, circular, triangular, elliptical, or some other common
shape to simplify analysis and performance prediction, as shown in Figure 2.2. (b). The
length L of a rectangular patch is typically 0.3333λ0˂L˂0.5 λ0, where λ0 denotes the free-
space wavelength. The patch is chosen to be very thin such that t ˂˂ λ0 (where t is the patch
thickness). The height h of the dielectric substrate is usually 0.003λ0≤ h ≤ 0.5λ0. The
dielectric constant of the substrate (εr) is typically in the range 2.22≤ εr ≤12.
The fringing fields between the patch edge and the ground plane are what cause microstrip
patch antennas to emit. A thick dielectric substrate with a low dielectric constant is desired
for superior antenna performance because it gives better efficiency, larger bandwidth, and
better radiation [8]. However, such a setup necessitates a larger antenna. To make a compact
Microstrip patch antenna, higher dielectric constant substrates must be employed, which are
Because of its low-profile design, microstrip patch antennas are becoming more common in
wireless applications. As a result, they're ideal for integrated antennas in handheld wireless
devices like cellular phones and pagers. Microstrip patch antennas are commonly used for
telemetry and communication antennas on missiles because they must be tiny and conformal.
Satellite communication is another area where they've proven successful.
• Narrow bandwidth
• Low efficiency
• Low Gain
• Extraneous radiation from feeds and junctions
• Poor end fire radiator except tapered slot antennas
• Low power handling capacity.
• Surface wave excitation
In its most basic form, a patch antenna is a flat plate over a ground plane, as shown in the
diagram. The feed probe is the central conductor of a cable that couples electromagnetic
energy into and out of the patch. Also shown is the electric field distribution of a rectangular
patch activated in its fundamental mode.
MPA use a variety of feeding tactics. Because these antennas have a dielectric substrate on
one side and a radiating element on the other, they have a dielectric substrate on one side and
a radiating element on the other. These feeding approaches are divided into two groups:
contacting and non-contacting. The power is sent directly to the radiating patch through the
connecting element, i.e. the microstrip line, in the contacting feed technique. An
electromagnetic magnetic coupling is used to transfer power between the microstrip line and
the radiating patch in a non-contacting approach. Even if there are numerous novel feed
approaches, the microstrip line, coaxial probe, aperture coupling, and proximity coupling are
the most popular or widely employed.
The patch antenna's microstrip feed line is linked directly to the patch antenna's edge. This
feed concept has the advantage of being etched on the same substrate, keeping the overall
structure flat.
Coaxial-line feed, also known as probe feed, is a common technique for feeding microstrip
patch antennas nowadays, in which the coaxial's internal conductor is extended through the
dielectric and connected to the radiation patch antenna, while the outer conductor is
connected to the Ground plane ground plane, as shown in Figure 2.4(b). The main advantage
of this feed is that it can be placed in any desired location within the patch to match the
patch's input impedance. It's also simple to make and emits little spurious radiation. Its
downsides include a restricted bandwidth and a greater difficulty in modeling [12].
The aperture-coupled structure, which consists of two substrates separated by a ground plane,
is a popular feeding configuration in microstrip patch antennas. Furthermore, the lower
substrate is visible from the bottom. As shown in Figure 2.4, there is a microstrip feed line
whose energy is linked to the patch during a slot on the ground plane separating the two
substrates (c). The bottom substrate is made of a high dielectric material, whereas the top
substrate is made of a thick low dielectric constant substance. In addition to isolating the feed
from the radiating element, the ground plane between the substrates lowers spurious radiation
interference for pattern development and polarization purity. This feeding system has the
disadvantage of being difficult to construct and having a narrow band. It is, on the other hand,
easy to predict and has a moderate amount of spurious radiation [12].
Between the patch and the feeding line, energy is exchanged via electromagnetic coupling.
The removal of spurious feed-network radiation and the improvement in bandwidth owing to
the increased overall substrate thickness are two advantages of this feeding design. The
primary disadvantages of this feeding technology are that it is difficult to manufacture since
two layers must be precisely aligned [12].
Following the selection of the L and W patch dimensions for the specified substrate, the feed
point must be calculated in order to create a satisfactory impedance match between the
generator impedance and the patch element's input impedance. As a result of the change in
feed location, the input impedance changes, providing a simple way for impedance matching.
The feed point is chosen so that the input resistance Rin is equal to the impedance of the feed
line, which is commonly 50 ohm.
Following the selection of the L and W patch dimensions for the specified substrate, the feed
point must be calculated in order to create a satisfactory impedance match between the
generator impedance and the patch element's input impedance. As a result of the change in
feed location, the input impedance changes, providing a simple way for impedance matching.
2.5.1 Polarization
When used in the dominant mode, the polarization of a rectangular patch antenna is linear
and directed along the resonating dimension. Patch antennas with a large bandwidth can also
operate in the higher order mode. These modes can have different emission patterns and
polarization than the dominant mode. The fringing field along the no radiating edges is
another source of cross-polarization. The fields at the radiating edges are orientated 90
degrees away from these fields. In the E and H planes, they have little effect on the radiation
fields. Even the perfect, single mode patch will radiate cross-polarized fields in the
intercardinal planes. With increasing substrate thickness, the level of cross-polarization rises.
The antenna's polarization can be altered mechanically or electrically. PIN diodes or varactor
diodes can be used for electronic tuning. In mobile communications, polarization 24 diversity
is used to adjust for signal strength loss due to fading [13].
The primary objective of this thesis is to design a wideband microstrip patch antenna that can
operate at full X band (8 GHz -12 GHz) and possibly some portion of Ku band (12GHz – 18
GHz). Due to absence of concise mathematical formula to design a wideband MPA it is
challenging task to design one that can provide required bandwidth. This inset feed partial
ground wideband MPA design strategies and full process of iterative modification of the
antenna design along with gradual enhancement of the bandwidth are presented
chronologically in this chapter.
Ansys HFSS simulation software is used to get the improved bandwidth and desired antenna
performance. Another EM analysis simulation software, CST Microwave Suite is used to
verify the antenna performance. Both results confirmed that the antenna has the full
capability to operate at complete X band and lower portion of Ku band.
Three primary parameters are shown below that are selected to design the antenna. These
parameters are chosen with specific design goal in mind that will be discussed later in this
chapter. These parameters not subject to modification for design optimization.
• Dielectric constant: FR-4 Epoxy substrate with dielectric constant of 4.4 has been
selected as dielectric material for MPA.
• Height of substrate: Generally, MPAs are very compact devices so for basic
configuration of MPA standard thickness has been selected as 1.6 mm.
The two most significant characteristics to consider when designing patch antennas are
substrate permittivity and loss tangent. The microstrip patch antenna's most serious
limitations are its narrow bandwidth and poor gain. As a result, choosing the right substrate
permittivity decreases surface wave losses and increases antenna performance, particularly
impedance bandwidth and radiation efficiency [22]. A thicker substrate will enhance radiated
power, minimize conductor loss, and improve impedance bandwidth, in addition to being
mechanically stronger. However, it will add weight, as well as dielectric loss, surface wave
loss, and unwanted radiation from the probe feed. A Substrate with low dielectric constant
will enhance the fringing field at the patch periphery. As a result, the antenna's radiated
power will be enhanced as well. Therefore, a lower dielectric constant is preferred, however
it will increase antenna size so the substrate material should be chose accordingly. The
antenna's dielectric loss increases with a large substrate loss tangent, lowering its efficiency.
The permittivity of the most often used dielectric substrate materials for printing patch
antennas ranges from roughly 2 to 10 depending on the application. The antenna gain
increases as the permittivity decreases. This is because the traveling wave of a higher
permittivity substrate slows down as it passes through the antenna.
Patch width has a modest impact on the antenna's resonance frequency and radiation pattern.
However, it has a greater impact on input resistance and bandwidth. A larger patch width
improves the amount of power radiated, resulting in lower resonant resistance, more
bandwidth, and higher radiation efficiency. The production of grating lobes in antenna arrays
is a limitation against a wider patch width. To achieve good radiation efficiency, it has been
suggested that the length to width ratio of the path should be between one and two (1 L/W 2).
Because of the patch's intrinsic narrow bandwidth, the patch length affects the resonant
frequency and is a significant parameter in the design. The length of a microstrip patch (L)
can be estimated as,
…………….3.1
Where c, fr and εr represents speed of light in free space, resonant frequency and dielectric
constant of the substrate respectively.
The fields are not limited to the patch in practice. As illustrated in figure 3.3(a), a portion of
the fields lay outside the patch's physical dimensions (LW). The fringing field is what it's
called.
The influence of the fringing field along the patch width, W, can be taken into account using
the effective dielectric constant for a microstrip line of width W on the given substrate.
………………(3.2)
Where h is the dielectric substrate's height. The influence of the fringing field along the patch
length L can be stated as [20] by adding a line length to either end of the patch length.
……………..(3.3)
…………..(3.4)
………………..(3.6)
It is necessary to have a finite ground plane for practical reasons. If the size of the ground
plane is bigger than the patch dimensions by approximately six times the substrate thickness
all around the periphery, similar results can be obtained for finite and infinite ground planes.
As a result, the ground plane dimensions for this design are [21].
……………….(3.7)
………………………..(3.8)
The design process and bandwidth improvement of the MPA is shown in this section. The
primary parameter is to look for is the S11/return loss, VSWR, Bandwidth, Directivity and
Gain. To get a better idea about MPA parameters a 2.4 GHz WiFi band antenna design is
shown in the figure 3.3 (a)
Figure 3.4 (a): 2.4 GHz WiFi band Microstrip Patch Antenna
This 2.4 GHz WiFi band antenna is a full ground inset feed MPA. The substrate size, patch
length and width, Feed Line width can be directly calculated from the mathematical
expression mentioned in chapter 2. However with the calculate value the resonance frequency
is not exactly 2.4 GHz. With some little modification of patch dimension the result reached
satisfactory level. From S11 parameter plot we can observe that the antenna is resonating at
2.39 GHz with lowest return loss of -30.4 dB. The m2 and m3 marker of the plot indicating
S11 of -10 dB at 2.33 GHz and 2.45 GHz .So we can conclude from the graph that the
antenna provides 120 MHz of bandwidth.
To get the optimized antenna at first we calculated the dimension of the patch, ground and
feedline using mathematical expressions [6]. With this calculated dimension we designed a
simple rectangular MPA using Ansys HFSS EM simulation software. FR-4 Epoxy with
dielectric constant of 4.4 and loss tangent of 0.02 is selected as substrate material. For FR-4
Epoxy substrate optimized thickness is found to be 1.5 mm to 1.6 mm [22]. We used
thickness of 1.6 mm because FR-4 is widely available in this size. Substrate length and width
are selected 23.8 mm and 28.2 mm respectively. For patch length is 13.8 mm and width is 19
The S11 parameter plot of the designed MPA indicates resonance at 12.47 GHz with S11
value of -47.3 dB. The resulted resonance frequency is very different from the expected one.
The difference between calculated and simulated resonance frequency is due to the imperfect
nature of the empirical equations. Although resonance frequency is not in X band it is very
close to it and a starting point for our desired antenna. Iterative design optimization can be
done to get the antenna with intended performance
3.5 Optimization
The antenna optimization process begins with a trial-and-error step in which we determine
how different factors affect the antenna's behavior. It has been demonstrated that, in order to
position a resonant frequency at a different operational frequency, a first practical method can
be used. Using an optimization strategy necessitates determining the values of several
parameters or components.[23]
When dealing with complicated problems, traditional search and optimization methods have a
variety of drawbacks. When one algorithm is used to tackle a variety of issues, the major
challenge occurs. This is because each classical approach is designed to efficiently tackle
only a specific class of problems. As a result, these methodologies lack the flexibility to
address the wide range of difficulties that designers and practitioners face. Furthermore, most
traditional approaches lack a global viewpoint and frequently converge to a locally optimal
solution.
Figure 3.5 (c): Resulted design after introduction of inset and partial ground
Introduction of inset slot and partial ground with a varying dimension resulted very good
outcome compare to initial findings. S11/Return loss plot now showing a wideband response
with frequency ranging from 9.7 GHz to 13.9 GHz. With current optimization the antenna
now covers a good portion of X band. To cover the full X band more optimization needs to
be done.
To use an advancement system, we must first choose our estimates for various factors or
variables. It also necessitates the use of a fitness function to calculate the fitness of several
solutions and arrive at the best outcome. The purpose of this study is to construct a fitness
function that will allow the antenna to reach the desired bandwidth. Using the preceding
equations and approaches, the following Rectangular shape MPA(ESMPA) was obtained,
which was initially un optimized. Given the non-desired current values of the antenna's length
and operational frequency, this rule can be used to compute the length that the antenna must
have in order to attain the predicted resonant frequency.
Figure 3.5 (e): Dimensions of substrate, patch and feedline of the proposed X
band MPA
To achieve the thesis's main goal, extensive simulations were run to determine the most
optimized antenna for X band operation. Many antennas and array configurations were
created, and a progressive increase in bandwidth was noticed. For enhanced antenna
properties, the proposed antenna inset slots cutting and partial ground approach has been
applied. Because of the features of inset slots, partial ground the bandwidth has expanded
exponentially. The proposed antenna has a bandwidth of 6.7 GHz and covers full X band
frequency range and 12-14.6 GHz portion of the Ku which means it can support terrestrial
broadband, uplink and downlink of satellite, mobile-satellite service, broadcasting satellite
services, secure military communication, military satellite communication, direct broadcast
satellite TV relay, fixed satellite service, amateur radio, weather monitoring , air traffic
control, maritime vessel traffic control and radar application.
The antenna performance metrics such as bandwidth, return loss, average current distribution,
vector current distribution, 2D, 3D radiation patterns of gain and directivity are simulated
using Ansys HFSS 3D EM simulator. The same performance metrics are also simulated using
CST Studio Suite 3D EM simulation tool for comparison purpose that will be discussed in the
section.
The current distribution depicts the antenna structure and aids in determining the density and
direction of current movement inside the patch at various frequencies. It also demonstrates
how different parts of the antenna respond to various operating frequencies. The power
radiated by an antenna as a function of the direction away from the antenna is shown
graphically in 2D and 3D radiation patterns. 2D radiation pattern provides 3D rotatable view
of antenna directivity and gain with emission style in terms of axial ratio, azimuth, and
The average current distribution shows which side is radiating and which is non-radiating.
Normally, an antenna resonates at a half wavelength length. Current maximum occurs at the
centre of a half wavelength in patches and dipoles, and minimum offers at the edges where
the conductor ends. Current is greatest (bright red) in the center of the radiating side and
lowest at the margins. It is clear which side is radiating or acting as length and which side is
non-radiating or acting as breadth in this case. On the non-radiating side, there is no current
density, as can be seen.
The vector current distribution depicts how the current is spread and flowing in the antenna's
surface. It aids in determining the antenna's polarization. The figure shows that current
follows a linear path in the surface, which corresponds to the antenna's linear polarization.
The antenna's highest current is in the middle of its length, and it’s smallest near the edges,
according to the distribution.
The 2D radiation pattern aids in understanding how the antenna radiates in 3D. Due to the
difficulty of displaying a 3D pattern on a 2D surface, the 2D radiation pattern is utilized for
analytical purposes. A good antenna should keep its radiation pattern consistent over the
whole frequency range it covers. The radiation pattern of the proposed antenna is shown
below at 7.88 GHz, 9.95 GHz and 14.6 GHz.
Although the 3D radiation pattern cannot be used to derive much information, it has been
included in the book to help understand the 2D patterns. A better understanding of antenna
power radiation direction can be gained by looking at a 3D radiation pattern. Figure 4.1(n) to
4.1(o) depicts actual 3D radiation patterns of the proposed single element inset feed MPA at
7.88 GHz, 8.45 GHz and 14.6 GHz frequencies. They represent the pattern in 3D space. The
strength of the field at a certain (theta, phi) angle is represented by the size of the pattern
from the origin.
To verify the result that we got from Ansys HFSS, we designed the antenna in CST Studio
Suite using the exact same materials and parameters. However exact same simulation
configuration can’t be used due to some dissimilarities between two software. The obtained
result from CST Studio Suite is presented here.
Figure 4.2 (b) shows the of the S11 parameter (return loss) of the planned antenna using CST
Studio Suite. The S11 parameter is very important because it determines how well the
antenna impedance matches the reference transmission line impedance. In general, the
antenna is modeled with 50 Ohm reference impedance. When the antenna impedance is
perfectly matched to the reference 50 ohm impedance, the antenna port reflects less power
and the antenna radiates maximum power in the direction of the main lobe.
Figure 4.2(c): shows simulated VSWR of the proposed antenna using CST Studio Suite. It
has lowest value of 1.036 at 8.93 GHz and since it is very close to 1 therefore VSWR plot
also suggests a near perfect impedance matching.
Figure 4.2(d): Comparison of simulated S11 Parameter using HFSS and CST
Comparison between simulated return loss(S11) of the proposed antenna using both Ansys
HFSS and CST Studio Suite is presented in the figure 4.2(d). The comparison plot
demonstrates a good similarity between two results. Both results show very good impedance
matching. Lowest S11 of HFSS CST result is -36.37 dB and -35.11 dB. The Antenna
resonates at 9.95 GHz for HFSS and 8.93 GHz for CST. Operating frequency range of the
proposed antenna is 7.88 GHz to 14.6 GHz and 8.35 GHz to 14.25 GHz for HFSS and CST
respectively. The antenna offers 6.7 GHz and 5.9 GHz according to HFSS and CST result
Table 4.2.1: Comparison of the simulated results using Ansys HFSS and CST Studio Suite
Table 4.2.2: Comparison between proposed design and references based relevant works
25 27 28 26 29
Bandwidth
2.14 1.48 .71 1.59 1.56 6.7
(GHz)
Return Loss -40.99 -42.23 -29.21 -17.14 -32.5 -36.37
Patch antennas are widely used due to their low profile, small weight, and inexpensive cost.
They provide a number of benefits over traditional antennas. The two significant issues,
however, are limited bandwidth and low gain.
The narrow bandwidth and low gain challenge for a single band patch microstrip antenna has
been investigated in this thesis. Partial ground as well as inset slot cutting approach used to
increase its bandwidth. Because slot has an effect on the electromagnetic properties of the
host media, it has the potential to improve bandwidth and gain in antenna design. From the
RMPA to the suggested antenna, this thesis illustrates a gradual improvement in antenna
characteristics. All of the development process of the antenna has been briefly addressed, and
it function in the X and Ku band frequency range, allowing it to support advanced satellite
communication, satellite broadcasting, and other fascinating operations in this area. The
suggested antenna's bandwidth is primarily boosted by inset slot and partial ground, and it
can be further improved by inserting two rectangular slots and modifying the substrate
material. The antenna is 23.8 x 28.2 mm2 in size, with a substrate height of 1.6 mm. With
three resonance frequencies of 8.45 GHz, 9.95 GHz, and 13.17 GHz, the proposed single
element patch antenna covers the whole X band and lower portion of Ku band. At these
frequencies, the reflection coefficient or return loss is -25.23 dB, -36.37 dB, and -17.60 dB,
respectively, and the VSWR is less than 2 across the whole X band and lower portion of Ku
band. The structure's maximum gain and directivity are 6.33 dB and 7.08 dBi, respectively.
To verify the output, we had to compare it to two well-known programs Ansys HFSS and
CST Studio Suite. The return loss is nearly same, as is the gain. The VSWR value ranges
between 1 and 2. To understand the effects of various factors on each other in terms of
The influence of slot and rectangular slots on the bandwidth of a rectangular patch antenna
was investigated in this thesis. Future work could include experimenting with different slot
structures and modifying the antenna type (including antenna form and substrate dielectric).
To increase impedance bandwidth, an impedance matching network might be utilized.
Various techniques can also be used in future to design optimized antennas which are as
Follows:
• Metamaterials
Fabrication of the antenna can be done in the future to observe their real-time performance.
The antenna structure is very simple and FR-4 Epoxy substrate is widely available. So it can
easily be manufactured with a very affordable cost. Other commonly used techniques on the
suggested antenna could be used to improve antenna characteristics further.
[1] B. D. Patel Microstrip Patch Antenna A Historical Perspective of the Development Electronics &
Telecommunication
[2] Khan, W.M. and S.M. Gulhane, Related review on microstrip patch antennas. International Journal of
Industrial Electronics and Electrical Engineering.
[3] M. A. Haque, L. C. Paul, R. Azim, M. M. Mowla, A. Saleh, and M. N. Hossain, “A Modified E-Shaped
Microstrip Patch Antenna for C Band Satellite Applications.” IEEE, 16 April 2020, doi:
10.1109/SPICSCON48833.2019.9065126.
[5] Ge, Y.; Esselle, K.P.; Bird, T.S.; , "E-shaped patch antennas for highspeed wireless networks," Antennas
and Propagation, IEEE Transactionson , vol.52, no.12, pp. 3213- 3219, Dec. 2004
[6] Ang, B. K., & Chung, B. K. (2007). A wideband E-shaped microstrip patch antenna for 5-6 GHz
wirelesscommunications. Progress In Electromagnetics Research, 75, 397-407...
[7] Gourav Hans, “Design and operation of dual/triple band slotted Microstrip monopole antenna for wireless
applications”. M.Sc. Thesis, Thapar University, 2014.
[8] Hadian, A. M., and H. R. Hassani. "Wideband rectangular microstrip patch antenna with U-slot." Antennas
and Propagation, 2007. EuCAP 2007. The Second European Conference on. IET, 2007
[9] Ge, Y., Esselle, K. P., & Bird, T. S. (2006). A compact E-shaped patch antenna with corrugated wings.
IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation, 54(8), 2411-2413.
[10] Wang, B.-Z.; Xiao, S.; Wang, J.; , "Reconfigurable patch-antenna design for wideband wireless
communication systems," Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, IET , vol.1, no.2, pp.414-419, April 2007
[11] Raj, R. K., Joseph, M., Aanandan, C. K., Vasudevan, K., & Mohanan, P. (2006). A new compact
microstrip-fed dual-band coplanar antenna for WLAN applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation, 54(12), 3755-3762.
[12] Kaushal, D., & Shanmuganantham, T. (2017). A Vinayak slotted rectangular microstrip patch antenna
design for C‐band applications. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 59(8), 1833-1837.
[13] M. Sanad, “Double C-patch antennas having different aperture shapes,” in Proc. IEEE AP-S Symp.,
Newport Beach, CA, pp. 2116–2119, June 1995.
[14] Ang, B. K., & Chung, B. K. (2007). A wideband E-shaped microstrip patch antenna for 5-6 GHz wireless
communications. Progress In Electromagnetics Research, 75, 397-407...
[15] Yang, F.; Xue-Xia Zhang; Xiaoning Ye; Rahmat-Samii, Y.; , "Wide-band E-shaped patch antennas for
wireless communications," Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on , vol.49, no.7, pp.1094-1100,
Jul2001
[16] Weigand, S.; Huff, G.H.; Pan, K.H.; Bernhard, J.T , "Analysis and design of broad-band single-layer
rectangular U slot microstrip patch antennas," Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on , vol.51,no.3,
pp. 457- 468, March 2003
[18] Rafi, G. and L. Shafai, “Broadband micro-strip patch antenna with V-slot,” IEE Proc. Microw. Antenna
Propag., Vol. 151, No. 5, 435–440, Oct. 2004
[19] B.K, Ang and B.K Chung, “A wideband E shaped Microstrip Patch Antenna for 5-6 GHz Wireless
Communications,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 75, 397–407, 2007
[20] Gagandeep Kaur and Madhusudhan R Goud. Article: Slotted Rectangular Microstrip Antenna for Dual
Band Operation.International Journal of Computer Applications 66(17):40-43, March 2013.
[20] Raj, R. K., Joseph, M., Aanandan, C. K., Vasudevan, K., & Mohanan, P. (2006). A new compact
microstrip-fed dual-band coplanar antenna for WLAN applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and
Propagation, 54(12), 3755-3762.
[21] Santosa, C. E., Sri Sumantyo, J. T., Urata, K., Chua, M. Y., Ito, K., & Gao, S. (2018). Development of a
Low Profile Wide-Bandwidth Circularly Polarized Microstrip Antenna for C-Band Airborne CP-SAR Sensor.
Progress In Electromagnetics Research, 81, 77-88.
[22] Oluwafemi A. Ilesanmi, Charles U. Ndujiuba, Effects of Using Different Substrates on the Performance of
an Inset-Fed Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna, International Journal of Networks and Communications,
Vol. 8 No. 2, 2018, pp. 37-41. doi: 10.5923/j.ijnc.20180802.03
[23] Islam, M. T., Misran, N., Take, T. C., & Moniruzzaman, M. (2009, August). Optimization of microstrip
patch antenna using particle swarm optimization with curve fitting. In Electrical Engineering and Informatics,
2009. ICEEI'09. International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 711-714). IEEE.
[24] Ayoub, A. F. A., “Analysis of rectangular micro-strip antennas with air substrates,” in Journal of
Electromagnetic Waves and Applications, Vol. 17, No. 12, pp 1755–1766, 2003.
[25] R. Kiruthika, T. Shanmuganantham and R. K. Gupta, "A novel dual band microstrip patch antenna with
DOS for X-band applications," 2017 International Conference on Computer, Communication and Signal
Processing (ICCCSP), 2017, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/ICCCSP.2017.7944078.
[26] Islam, M. M., Islam, M. T., Faruque, M. R. I., & Hueyshin, W. (2013). Design of an X-band microstrip
patch antenna with enhanced bandwidth. 2013 2nd International Conference on Advances in Electrical
Engineering (ICAEE). doi:10.1109/icaee.2013.6750355
[27] R. Kiruthika, T. Shanmuganantham and R. K. Gupta, "A fan shaped triple band microstrip patch antenna
with DGS for X-band applications," 2016 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation,
Communication and Computational Technologies (ICCICCT), 2016, pp. 292-297, doi:
10.1109/ICCICCT.2016.7987962.
[28] K Sudhaman, T Godhavari, & R Anusha (2020). Design of Microstrip Patch Antenna at 10.3 GHz for X-
Band Applications. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 993, 012066.
[29] Singh, V., Mishra, B., & Singh, R. (2015). A Compact and Wide Band Microstrip Patch Antenna for X-
Band Applications. 2015 Second International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication
Engineering. doi:10.1109/icacce.2015.135