Defining Literacy in The 21st Century: A Guide To Terminology and Skills
Defining Literacy in The 21st Century: A Guide To Terminology and Skills
Defining Literacy in The 21st Century: A Guide To Terminology and Skills
net/publication/288246131
CITATIONS READS
14 21,713
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Elda E. Martinez on 27 December 2015.
Volume 1, Issue 1
C
2013
Co-editors:
Leslie Haas
Debra Lee
Susan Szabo
Sheri Vasinda
www.texasreaders.org
60
Elda E. Martinez
University of the Incarnate Word
Abstract
In the twenty-first century, literacy skills increasingly reflect technology use and the
abilities necessary to problem-solve, collaborate, and present information through multi-
media. As technology becomes more readily available to all students, concepts of
literacy change. Researchers and theorists from various disciplines define and describe
21st century literacies using many terms that are inadvertently interchanged and/or
unfamiliar to teachers. The purpose of this article is to review contemporary definitions
of literacy to clarify what is currently known about 21st century literacy skills.
Literacy generally refers to reading and However, literacy concepts have not
writing effectively in a variety of only been changing, they have been
contexts. In the 21st century, the overlapping, as information literacy,
definition of literacy has increasingly multiliteracies/multiple literacies, new
reflected the ability to use technology literacy, digital literacy, and web literacy
for gathering and communicating are all used to describe similar skills
information. The International Reading necessary for 21st century learning. The
Association (IRA) stated that the intent of this literature review is to
literacies used by today’s students are document and clarify what is currently
much different from those of their known about 21st century literacy skills
parents or even those of students from in order to provide clarity and
just a decade ago (IRA, 2009). The IRA consistency among educators.
position statement reported that in
order “to become fully literate in 21st Century Literacies
today’s world, students must become
Information Literacy
proficient in the literacies of the 21st
Information literacy has been
century technologies” (p.1).
historically used to reference the
literacy skills needed for information
Since IRA’s statement adoption in 2009,
access and problem-solving. Paul
abundant research has been published
Zurkowski, President of the Information
about 21st century literacy skills. In
Industry Association, included reference
addition, the National Education
to this term in a 1974 proposal
Technology Plan (NETP, 2010) called for
recommending the establishment of a
an emphasis on 21st century
program to promote information
competencies at all levels of education.
may be considered new (Coiro, Knobel, 2008). Because the research comes
Lankshear, & Leu, 2008). Definitions of from various fields such as cognitive
literacy depend on emerging technology science, sociolinguistics, cultural
tools which require different ways of anthropology, information science, and
conceiving and communicating meaning others, it can be difficult to understand
presented in multiple media and the varying terminology. Leu, Kinzer,
modality forms as a part of literacy. The Coiro, and Cammack, (2004) stated that
Internet has greatly impacted literacy new literacies allow individuals to use
and has contributed to changing views the Internet “to identify important
of literacy (Coiro et al., 2008). New questions, locate information, critically
web-based tools emerge on the Internet evaluate the usefulness of that
constantly and require specific, new, information, synthesize information to
skills. answer those questions, and then
communicate the answers to others” (p.
The terms multiple literacies and new 1570). Therefore, one might consider
literacies signify a broad range of any technique requiring new
perspectives on literacy similar in that technological reading and writing skills
they convey an understanding of to be a new literacy. For example,
literacies as social and cultural practices blogging is an online form of a journal
that are continuously changing. that requires new skills for users. Media
However, discussion of new literacies sharing, such as photo and video
tends to involve new technologies, and sharing, also requires new skills for
literacy education (Cervetti, Damico, & users (Pilgrim & Bledsoe, 2013).
Pearson, 2006). These two concepts
tend to involve many literacies and Leu et al. (2004) presented a difference
modalities beyond print literacy between the terms new literacies (lower
(including new literacies) as well as an case) and New Literacies (upper case).
emphasis on cultural considerations This difference may best be explained
(Cervetti, Damico, & Pearson, 2006). with the familiar umbrella analogy.
Many terms are associated with new Consider the overarching umbrella to be
literacies. Digital literacy, 21st century New Literacies. Everything in the field
literacies, internet literacy, media under the umbrella, including topics in
literacies, information literacy, ICT this article, includes new literacies.
literacies, and computer literacy refer to According to Leu (2011), lower case
terms which evolved to describe theories reflect the rapidly changing
literacies associated with ways to gather nature of literacy in a deictic world since
and communicate information using the they are closer to the specific types of
Internet and new technologies (Coiro et changes that are taking place and
al., 2008). interest those who study them. Lower
case theories enable the use of multiple
Many disciplines recognize and define lenses that are used and the
new literacies, and a new literacies technologies and contexts that are
perspective has emerged based on a studied. All theoretical insights are
wide range of research (Coiro et al., valued, even if they do not share a
particular lens, technology, or context literacy in this new milieu. Using the
(Leu, 2011). same skills used for centuries-
analysis, synthesis, and evaluation-
Digital Literacy we must look at digital literacy as
Digital literacy describes reading and another realm within which to apply
writing tasks utilizing media powered by elements of critical thinking. (Jones-
technology. Digital literacy is the ability Kavalier & Flannigan, 2008, p.14)
to find, evaluate, utilize, share, and
create content using information The Department of Education used the
technologies and the Internet (Cornell term digital literacy in the National
University, 2009, para. 1). This is a very Education Technology Plan (U.S.
general, broad term related to skills Department of Education, 2010) in
necessary in the 21st century and often reference to skills teachers need for the
used interchangeably with new literacy development of appropriate
and information literacy. Jones-Kavalier assignments for students to improve
& Flannigan (2008) narrowed the learning, assessment, and instructional
definition of digital literacy as “…the practice. This extensive plan for
ability to read and interpret media (text, transforming education referenced the
sound, images), to reproduce data and ISTE standards for additional
images through digital manipulation, information about what it means to be
and to evaluate and apply new digitally literate in an age of evolving
knowledge gained from digital technology. According to The
environments” ( p.14). International Society for Technology in
Education (ISTE), “Today's students
Digital literacy has become a more need to be able to use technology to
common term since Marc Prensky analyze, learn, and explore. Digital age
(2001) coined the terms digital native skills are critical for preparing students
and digital immigrant to describe to work, live, and contribute to the
generational differences among social and civic fabric of their
learners. According to Prensky, a digital communities” (ISTE, 2012, para. 2). ISTE
native was born in the digital age with developed the National Educational
access to technology. A digital Technology Standards (NETS) for
immigrant refers to one lacking student success in a digital age which
exposure to technology until later in life. include skills related to creativity and
However, just because one is born in innovation; communication and
the digital age does not mean the digital collaboration; research and information
natives have instinctively learned how fluency; critical thinking, problem
to use technology effectively. It cannot solving and decision making; digital
be assumed they know how to citizenship; and technology operations
synthesize and analyze what they and concepts.
access, as ….
the greatest challenge is moving Web Literacy
beyond the glitz and pizazz of the Web literacy refers to the skills needed
flashy technology to teach [new] for successful web navigation
impact education and how teachers literacy skills and the roles they will play
address literacy tasks. Thus, educators in classroom instruction.
need to understand 21st century
Table 1
Summary of 21st Century Literacy Terminology
Term Description
Information Literacy The ability to recognize when information is needed and to
have the ability to locate, evaluate, and use effectively the
needed information (ALA, 1989).
Multiliteracies The multiple ways of communicating and making meaning,
including such modes as visual, audio, spatial, behavioral,
and gestural (New London Group, 1996).
New Literacy The use of new technologies to gather and communicate
information (Coiro et al., 2008).
Digital Literacy The ability to find, evaluate, utilize, share, and create
content using information technologies and the Internet
(Cornell University, 2009).
Web Literacy The knowledge and use of specific skills needed to locate,
analyze, and communicate information found online.
References
American Association of School Librarians (2007). Standards for the 21st century
learner. American Library Assoication. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/aasl/sites/ala.org.aasl/files/content/guidelinesandstandards
/learningstandards/AASL_LearningStandards.pdf.
American Library Association (1989). Presidential committee on information literacy.
Final Report. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential.
American Library Association and Association for Educational Communications and
Technology (1998). The vision of information power: Building partnerships
for learning. Retrieved from http://www.d91.net/LRC/LRCPDF/Attachment%201-
A.pdf
Blanchard, J. & Farstrup, A. (2011). Technologies, digital media, and reading instruction.
In S.J. Samuels & A.E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading
instruction (4th ed., pp. 286-314). Newark, DE: International Reading
Association.
Burchinal, L. (1976). The communications revolution: America’s third century challenge.
In The Future of organizing knowledge. Papers presented at the Texas A&M
University’s library’s centennial academic assembly. September 12, 1976,
College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.
Campbell, S. (2004). Defining information literacy in the 21st century. World Library and
Information Congress: 70th IFLA General Conference and Council, 1-9.
Cervetti, G., Damico, J., & Pearson, P. (2006). Multiple literacies, new literacies, and
teacher education. Theory into Practice, 45 (4), 378-386.
Coiro, J. & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies
used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the
Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 378-411.
Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (2008). Handbook of research in new
literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Cornell University (2009). Digital literacy resource. Retrieved from
http://digitalliteracy.cornell.edu/
Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: ideology in discourses. Philadelphia,
PA: Routledge, Falmer.
Gunning, T.G. (2012). Creating literacy instruction for all students (8th ed.). Boston,
MA: Pearson.
International Reading Association (2009). New literacies and 21st-century technologies:
A position statement of the International Reading Association (IRA PS 1067).
http://www.reading.org/General/AboutIRA/PositionStatements/21stCenturyLite
racies.asp
International Society for Technology Education (2012). ISTE Standards for Students.
Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/standards-for-students.
Jetton, T. & Shanahan, C. (2012). Adolescent literacy in the academic disciplines:
General principles and practical strategies. NY: The Guilford Press.
Jones-Kavalier, B.R. & Fannigan, S.I. (2008). Connecting the digital dots: Literacy of the
21st century. Teacher Librarian, 35(3) 13-16.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kress, (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary
communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kymes, A. (2005). Teaching online comprehension strategies using think-alouds. Journal
of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48(6), 492-500.
Leu, D. J. (2011). New literacies—Enriching research and theory. In P.J. .Dunston, L.B.
Gambrell, K. Headley, S.K. Fullerton, P.M. Stecker, V.R. Gillis, & C.C. Bates (Eds.), 60th
Yearbook of the Literacy Research Association, Newark, DE: International
Reading Association.
Leu, D., Kinzer, C., Coiro, J. & Cammack, D. (2004). New literacies: Toward a theory
of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information and
communication technologies. In R.B. Ruddell, & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical
Models and Processes of Reading (pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International
Reading Association.
Mackey, T. & Jacobson, T. (2011). Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy.
College & Research Libraries, 72(1), 62-78.
National Forum on Informational Literacy (2012). Information literacy skills. Retrieved
from http://infolit.org/information-literacy-projects-and-programs
New London Group (1996). A Pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures.
Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
November, A. (2008). Web literacy for educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Pilgrim, J., & Bledsoe, C. (2012). An investigation of technology in the classroom and its
impact on literacy education. English in Texas, 42(2), 45-49.
Pilgrim, J, & Bledsoe, C. (2013). The application of Web 2.0 tools in literacy education. In
J. Whittingham, S. Huffman, W. Rickman, & C. Wiedmaier (Eds.).Technological
Tools for the Literacy Classroom (pp. 27-45). New York, NY: IGI Global.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5). 1-6.
Retrieved from
http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/prensky%20%20digital%20natives,%20di
gital%20immigrants%20-%20part1.pdf
Schwarz, G. (2006). Expanding literacies through graphic novels. English Journal, 95(6),
58-64.
Sheridan-Thomas, H.K. (2007). Making sense of multiple literacies: Exploring pre-service
content area teachers' understandings and applications. Reading Research and
Instruction, 46(2), 121-150.
Spitzer, K., Eisenberg, M. & Lowe, C. (1998). Information literacy: Essential skills for the
information age. Syracuse University, NY: Clearinghouse on Information &
Technology.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (2009). Texas college and career readiness
standards. Austin: University of Texas. Retrieved from
www.thecb.state.tx.us/index.cfm?objectid=C9B4C756-ACDF-A9B7.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology (2010). Transforming
American education: Learning powered by technology. National Educational
Technology Plan. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/NETP-
2010-final-report.pdf.