Chat With Henry Fitzhugh Camp - Author of Thorughput Economics

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Sunday, 7 November 2021 12:29 PM

Henry Fitzhugh Camp

1st degree connection· 1st


When in doubt, choose the less efficient route.
• SATURDAYVenugopal V sent the following message at 7:59 AM
View Venugopal’s profile

Venugopal V 7:59 AM
Hi Henry, This is Venu from India. yesterday I bought Throughput Economics and started rea
The mention of cost per unit as a flawed method in making decisions made me think. I'm cur
into real estate development where we consider the cost of construction on per square feet
basis. As we pay the labour in per square feet of work done and material component is
ascertained to the requirement of area to be constructed, do you suggest per square feet is
flawed ?
• Henry Fitzhugh Camp sent the following message at 10:11 PM
View Henry Fitzhugh’s profile

Henry Fitzhugh Camp 10:11 PM


Hi Venu, Thanks for asking and thanks for buying the book! Yes, I think that metric is
flawed. However, that doesn't mean you can't benefit from using it. As is, it is a guess that m
good enough. It is certainly quick and easy!

Let me give you an outrageous example. Say you pay workers 1,000 INR per day and each p
can produce 100 sq ft per day. (You fix my numbers, because I don't know!) That suggests t
you pay any group of workers 10 INR per sq ft. If you need 10 sq ft for your dog's house, will
contractor accept your offer of $100 INR for the labor component of the dog house?

My point is that when you are doing small projects the INR per sq ft is in your favor, because
contractors have tremendous inefficiencies on small projects that do not spread well over th
small cost of the project. (They call these overheads.) These items we call OE and they'd inc
producing drawings, negotiating the price, hiring and assigning the workers, supervision, bill
ading it.
rrently
t

may be

person
that
l any

e
he
clude
ling,
contractor accept your offer of $100 INR for the labor component of the dog house?

My point is that when you are doing small projects the INR per sq ft is in your favor, because
contractors have tremendous inefficiencies on small projects that do not spread well over th
small cost of the project. (They call these overheads.) These items we call OE and they'd inc
producing drawings, negotiating the price, hiring and assigning the workers, supervision, bill
collections, accounting, office costs, payroll, etc., etc..

For very large projects, with many sq ft, I assume you pay multiple times for the OE, and so,
sq ft estimate is not in your favor. We suggest considering labor as another Operating Expe
because the amount of work a laborer can do in a day varies with the circumstances. In you
contractor's case, their T would be the price you pay less the totally variable costs of the raw
materials used in the construction: Lumber, Steel, Concrete, etc.. If the number of projects t
complete in a year produce more T than their annual OE, they make the difference in net pro

Ian Heptinstall has written on how to form a win-win relationship with contractors. It is ent
Breakthrough Project Management.

What I did on my house, a pretty major project, was this: 1) Negotiate with the builder how
money he wanted to make on the job. 2) Then, he estimated how long the project would las
We inflated his judgement on the duration by 20% to protect against weather and other dela
I paid him each month the amount from 1) divided by the number of months from 3), plus an
remaining amounts due if the project finished early. 5) I paid all bills from contractors and
suppliers directly.

This had the advantage of giving him an incentive to finish earlier, from which we'd both
benefit. It removed any risk from him of cost overruns and protected me from paying too m
change-orders. Furthermore, he no longer had any benefit from using substandard material
the construction.

You may ask if I forced this agreement on my contractor. The answer is no. In fact, he used
method on every subsequent house he built until he retired and we remain life-long friends.
for the long-winded answer! :-)

• TODAYVenugopal V sent the following message at 12:27 PM


View Venugopal’s profile

Venugopal V 12:27 PM
Thanks Henry for your response. It was definitely insightful. However, what are you views on
impact/implications of having Truly Variable Cost as large percentage of your per unit cost. I
case, we can very well base our decisions on per unit cost method, am I right ?
e
he
clude
ling,

a per
ense,
ur
w
they
ofit.

titled

much
st. 3)
ays. 4)
ny

much for
ls in

this
. Sorry

n the
In such

You might also like