Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 23 views

    Ceg612-Week 13-Eurocode 7 RW - Fai-Odl

    Uploaded by

    Luqman NH
    This document discusses the design of retaining walls according to Eurocode 7 and provides examples. It begins by outlining the learning outcomes and process, which are to understand the design requirements and apply them to calculate and design retaining walls. It then defines the different types of ultimate limit states and discusses which are relevant for geotechnical design. The rest of the document provides examples of limit state verification, design approaches, failure modes, and considerations for the design and construction of retaining walls.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ceg612-Week 13-Eurocode 7 RW - Fai-Odl

    Uploaded by

    Luqman NH
    23 views63 pages
    This document discusses the design of retaining walls according to Eurocode 7 and provides examples. It begins by outlining the learning outcomes and process, which are to understand the design requirements and apply them to calculate and design retaining walls. It then defines the different types of ultimate limit states and discusses which are relevant for geotechnical design. The rest of the document provides examples of limit state verification, design approaches, failure modes, and considerations for the design and construction of retaining walls.

    Original Description:

    fagsfhdgd ytrsydfydt stdyfg

    Original Title

    CEG612-WEEK 13-EUROCODE 7 RW -FAI-ODL

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses the design of retaining walls according to Eurocode 7 and provides examples. It begins by outlining the learning outcomes and process, which are to understand the design requirements and apply them to calculate and design retaining walls. It then defines the different types of ultimate limit states and discusses which are relevant for geotechnical design. The rest of the document provides examples of limit state verification, design approaches, failure modes, and considerations for the design and construction of retaining walls.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    23 views63 pages

    Ceg612-Week 13-Eurocode 7 RW - Fai-Odl

    Uploaded by

    Luqman NH
    This document discusses the design of retaining walls according to Eurocode 7 and provides examples. It begins by outlining the learning outcomes and process, which are to understand the design requirements and apply them to calculate and design retaining walls. It then defines the different types of ultimate limit states and discusses which are relevant for geotechnical design. The rest of the document provides examples of limit state verification, design approaches, failure modes, and considerations for the design and construction of retaining walls.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 63

    3.

    1 EUROCODE 7 EXAMPLES-RETAINING WALL

    EUROCODE7_GEOTECHNICAL
    DESIGN&APPLICATION
    ONLINE CLASS (WEEK 13)
    By:
    FAIZAH KAMARUDIN
    MASYITAH MD NUJID
    [email protected]
    PPKA
    BKBA 3.14
    UiTMCPP
    OPEN DISTANCE LEARNING & ACTIVITY

    LEARNINGOUTCOMES:STUDENSTSHOULDBEABLETO
    ▪ TO UNDERSTAND DESIGN
    REQUIREMENT IN EUROCODE 7
    ▪ TO DESIGN RETAINING WALL
    USING EUROCODE 7

    LEARNINGPROCESS:STUDENSTSHOULDBEABLETO

    Understand
    Define design and Apply-calculate/
    Theory/Concept construction Design
    requirements
    2

    TYPESOFULTIMATELIMITSTATE JAN 2018

    1. EQU 2. STR 4. UPL


    Loss of equilibrium of the Loss of equilibrium of
    structure or the ground, Internal failure or the structure or the
    considered as a rigid body, in excessive deformation of ground due to uplift by
    which the strengths of the structure or structural water pressure
    structural materials and the elements, including e.g.
    ground are insignificant in (buoyancy) or other
    footings, piles or
    providing resistance vertical actions
    basement walls, in which
    3. GEO 5. HYD
    the strength of structural
    Failure or excessive materials is significant Hydraulic heave,
    deformation of the in providing resistance internal erosion and
    ground, in which the piping in the ground
    strength of soil or rock caused by hydraulic
    is significant in gradients 4
    providing resistance


    GEOTECHNICALDESIGNULTIMATESTATE
    EQU-Static Equilibrium GEO & STR

    ❖ Relevant in structural ❖ To be considered in


    design. routine design.
    ❖ EQU verification – in ❖ Internal failure of
    geotechnical design structure (STR) &
    limited to rare cases. successive deformation of
    ❖ Cases : a rigid foundation ground (GEO)
    bearing on rock distinct ❖ Strength of structure and
    from overall stability or soil are significant.
    buoyancy problems. ❖ GEO will be the prevalent
    ❖ If any shearing resistance state for determining the
    Td is included, it should be size of the structural
    of minor importance. elements-in the design of
    retaining walls and
    6
    foundations.

    LIMITSTATESFOREARTH JUNE2018
    RETAININGSTRUCTURE DEC2019

    7
    EUROCODE7DESIGN_RETAININGWALL
    The limit states DEC2019
    Geotech
    Design
    should be verified by
    1 of 4 means

    Factor of Safety- Limit State Limit State


    Design Value Partial Factor based
    1. EQU
    on : ACTION & (Verification)
    EFFECT 2. GEO

    Basic 1. Action (A) 3. Experimental


    1. Principles (P) 2. Geotechnical
    parameters (M) 1. Calculation models & load
    2. Applicati
    on rules
    3. Resistance (R) test
    1. Permanent (G) 4.
    2. Variable (Q) 2. Observational
    3. Accidental (A)
    4. Seismic (AE) Prescriptive method

    unfavourable action (destabilised) = vertical


    load downwards (help to failure)
    favourable action (stabilised)= upwards load
    (help to stop failure)

    EQULIMIT
    STATE

    unfavourable action (destabilised) = vertical load


    downwards (help to failure)
    favourable action (stabilised)= upwards load (help
    to stop failure)
    9

    GEOLIMIT
    STATE

    unfavourable action (destabilised) = vertical load


    downwards (help to failure)
    favourable action (stabilised)= upwards load (help
    to stop failure)
    10

    MODESOFRETAININGSTRUCTUREFAILURE

    ▪ OVERALL
    STABILITY FOR
    RETAINING
    STRUCTURES

    11
    MODESOFRETAININGSTRUCTUREFAILURE
    ▪ FOUNDATION
    FAILURES OF
    GRAVITY WALLS

    ▪ ROTATIONAL
    FAILURES OF
    EMBEDDED
    WALLS

    12

    DESIGNAPPROACH
    ▪ Design Approach 1 is to be used in Malaysia.

    ▪ For Design Approach 1 (for retaining walls and shallow


    footings), two combinations are available.
    ▪ Except on occasions where it is obvious that one
    combination will govern the design (the combination of
    partial factor sets for Design Approach 1 is different for pile
    foundations).
    13

    DESIGNAPPROACH
    ▪ The sets for actions (denoted by A), material properties (denoted by M) and
    ground resistance (denoted by R) for each design approach are given in Table 5.1.
    Also given in the table are the partial factors for the EQU limit state.

    14
    unfavourable action (destabilised) = vertical load
    downwards (help to failure)

    favourable action (stabilised)= upwards load (help


    15
    to stop failure)

    16
    GEOTECHNICAL
    DESIGNBY
    CALCULATION
    DESIGNAND
    CONSTRUCTION
    CONSIDERATIONS

    18
    DESIGNAND
    CONSTRUCTION
    CONSIDERATIONS
    DESIGNAND
    CONSTRUCTION
    CONSIDERATIONS
    DESIGNAND
    CONSTRUCTION
    CONSIDERATIONS
    DESIGNAND
    CONSTRUCTION
    CONSIDERATIONS
    Horizontal Ground Surface, Ko

    Ground slopes, Ko

    22
    https://www.google.com/search?q=at+rest+pressure+retaining+walls&rlz=1C1CHBF_enMY817MY817&sxsrf=ALeKk01-
    uS19UwUM8_d9X70qqdzFrz1QYA:1605331176386&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiJn4_UpIHtAhXo4XMBHTQuCcEQ_AUoAXoECBkQAw&biw=16 00&bih=757#imgrc=pMHWgIILV1KmGM

    DESIGNAND
    CONSTRUCTION
    CONSIDERATIONS
    DESIGNAND
    CONSTRUCTION
    CONSIDERATIONS
    DESIGNAND
    CONSTRUCTION
    CONSIDERATIONS
    EXAMPLESOFDESIGNCALCULATION
    Strength and Stability Check
    (Traditional vs EUROCODE 7)
    Flexible Retaining Structure for
    Cantilever Sheet Piled Walls

    Free Earth Support Method for


    Anchored Sheet Piled Walls

    https://www.google.com/search?q=stability+check+for+retaini
    ng+wall&rlz=1C1CHBF_enMY817MY817&sxsrf=ALeKk02rM
    TYZjXB7D2MsidaFaA-
    Mr9GI0g:1605338745403&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ve
    d=2ahUKEwi9waftwIHtAhXO63MBHUdJBRUQ_AUoAXoECB
    oQAw&biw=1600&bih=700#imgrc=_pvkIXjnvwLcXM

    26

    EXAMPLESOFDESIGNCALCULATION

    STRENGTH AND STABILITY


    CHECKS BY TRADITIONAL AND
    EUROCODE 7 APPROACHES

    27
    unfavourable action (destabilised) = vertical load downwards (help to
    failure)
    favourable action (stabilised)= upwards load (help to stop failure)

    unfavourable action (destabilised) = vertical load downwards


    (help to failure)
    favourable action (stabilised)= upwards load (help to stop failure)

    unfavourable action
    (destabilised) = vertical load
    downwards (help to failure)

    favourable action (stabilised)=


    upwards load (help to stop
    failure)

    36
    unfavourable action (destabilised) = vertical load downwards
    (help to failure)
    favourable action (stabilised)= upwards load (help to stop failure)

    EXAMPLESOFDESIGNCALCULATION

    FLEXIBLE RETAINING
    STRUCTURE BY EUROCODE 7
    APPROACHES – CANTILEVER
    SHEET PILE WALL

    45
    46
    unfavourable action (destabilised) = vertical load downwards
    (help to failure) favourable action (stabilised)= upwards load (help
    to stop failure)
    EXAMPLESOFDESIGNCALCULATION

    FREE EARTH SUPPORT METHOD


    FOR ANCHORED SHEET PILED
    WALLS BY EUROCODE 7
    APPROACHES

    54
    55
    56
    Anyquestions?
    You can find me at:
    ▪ [email protected]
    ▪ @masyitahmn

    61

    Recommendedtext
    Mainreferences
    Credits
    Special thanks to all the people who made and
    released these awesome resources for free:

    ▪ Notes by Dr. Ng Kok Shien


    ▪ Presentation template by SlidesCarnival
    ▪ Robots by Alex Monge
    ▪ Photographs by Unsplash

    64

    You might also like