Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing
Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing
Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing
a r t i c l e in f o abstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2014.09.021
1369-8001/& 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
S.S. Dhasade et al. / Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 30 (2015) 48–55 49
[15]. The processes carried at room temperature avoid oxida- 2.2. Reaction mechanism
tion and corrosion of thin films on tin doped indium oxide
(ITO) substrates and any conducting films (substrates). This At the beginning of reaction, copper sulfate in water
can potentially lead to a new generation of photovoltaic gets dissociated as follows,
devices that are light in weight, foldable, and flexible. The
2
wide range of associated structural, surface morphological, CuSO4-Cu2 þ þSO4 (1)
optical properties makes these films potentially attractive for
application as solar cell devices. In the present research work unstirred reactions are
As per author's knowledge, present work describes in carried out at room temperature. Mean while electroche-
detail the formation mechanism of CuSe nano rods with mical reduction of SeO2 becomes
precursor's concentration. As far as solar cell device
fabrication is concern, their basic requirement is materials SeO2 þ6H þ þ4e -H2Se þ2H2O (2)
structural, morphological and optical properties. So, pre-
sent investigation reports on the tuning of structural, Cu2 þ þH2Se-CuSe þ2H þ (3)
morphological and optical properties with precursors
concentration. Thus, present work is a reference data to
the research group which working on CuSe based solar 2.3. Instruments and characterization
cell. Also, present work is the addition to the knowledge
which is useful for the material synthesis by electrodepo- The phase and identity of the copper selenide were
sition method. The electrodeposition method provides recorded and verified by the X-Ray powder diffraction
various advantages, because of relatively simple as well using a Rigaku Rint-2000 X-ray diffractometer system with
as inexpensive equipment. Films can be fabricated on large a Cu/30 kV/15 mA (λ 1.5417 Å) radiation with a scan step of
area and irregular surfaces. The deposition happens closer 0.001. The surface morphology and the compositional
to equilibrium than in many high temperature methods, analysis of CuSe were confirmed by energy-dispersive X-
and there is no problem with inter element diffusion. The ray analysis, using JEOL model, JSM-6300 (LA). Raman
process can be rather precisely controlled because of its spectra of the films were collected on a combination
electrical nature; the toxic gaseous precursors are not used system including research grade FTIR model VERTEX 70
unlike in chemical gas phase methods. with model- Ram- II FT Raman spectrometer equipped
with Nd-YAG laser at 1064 nm wavelength. The spectra
were recorded at laser power 0–450 mW, the wave num-
2. Experimental ber range from 200 to 4000 cm 1. Optical absorption
study of the as deposited CuSe thin films on ITO coated
2.1. Preparation of solution glass substrate is carried out using UV–vis spectrometer.
Bath (1): bath (1) is prepared by taking the mixture of 3. Results and discussion
0.05 M of CuSO4 5H2O and 0.025 M of SeO2 in
distilled water. 3.1. Cyclic voltammetry
Bath (2): bath (2) is prepared by taking the mixture of
0.10 M of CuSO4 5H2O and 0.050 M of SeO2 in Fig. 1 shows that the cyclic voltammograms recorded
distilled water. onto stainless steel substrate from electrolytic solutions
Bath (3): bath (3) is prepared by taking the mixture of
0.15 M of CuSO4 5H2O and 0.075 M of SeO2 in
distilled water.
Bath (4): bath (4) is prepared by taking the mixture of
0.20 M of CuSO4 5H2O and 0.1 M of SeO2 in
distilled water.
Fig.2. Photograph of copper selenide thin films with different bath compositions (a) 0.05 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.025 M SeO2; (b) 0.1 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.05 M
SeO2; (c) 0.15 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.075 M SeO2 and (d) 0.2 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.1 M SeO2, with deposition time of 20 min.
Table 1
Comparison of standard and measured d values for, as deposited CuSe thin films.
0.05 M CuSO4 þ0.025 M SeO2 0.1 M CuSO4 þ 0.05 M SeO2 0.15 M CuSO4 þ 0.075 M SeO2 0.2 M CuSO4 þ 0.1 M SeO2
Fig. 4. SEM images of copper selenide thin film for, (a) bath composition of 0.05 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.025 M SeO2; (b) bath composition of 0.1 M
CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.05 M SeO2; (c) bath composition of 0.15 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.075 M SeO2 and (d) bath composition of 0.2 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.1 M SeO2, with
deposition time of 20 min.
, 10 9 (
2
( α ν)
Fig. 6. Optical band gap energy of copper selenide thin films, (a) bath
Fig. 7. Optical absorbance of copper selenide thin films, (a) bath
composition of 0.05 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.025 M SeO2; (b) bath composi-
composition of 0.05 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.025 M SeO2; (b) bath composi-
tion of 0.1 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.05 M SeO2; (c) bath composition of 0.15 M
tion of 0.1 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.05 M SeO2; (c) bath composition of 0.15 M
CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.075 M SeO2 and (d) bath composition of 0.2 M
CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.075 M SeO2 and (d) bath composition of 0.2 M
CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.1 M SeO2, with deposition time of 20 min.
CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.1 M SeO2; with deposition time of 20 min.
13 nm for bath composition of 0.15 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.075 M film estimated from the figure were reported [9,18]. For
SeO2 and 2.35 eV with crystal size of 17 nm for bath composi- semiconductor crystal electron excitation consists of
tion of 0.2 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.1 M SeO2. The decrease in the loosely bounded electron hole pair (Mott–Wannier excita-
optical band gap energy and appearance of second band gap tion) usually delocalized over length much longer than
with increases in bath concentration implies the creation of lattice constant. As diameter of semiconductor crystallite
additional energy levels due growth in crystal size. approaches this excitation its electronic properties starts
From the XRD results, we propose that the absorption to change this is due to quantum size effect [19,20]
edge red-shift is due to the better crystallinity of therefore we can study optical absorption spectra. Optical
copper selenide thin films grown at room temperature. absorption spectra for as-deposited copper selenide films
The crystallinity of the copper selenide thin films grown have been recorded over the range 300–750 nm. The abso-
with deposition time of 20 min. for bath composition of rbance versus wavelength of as-deposited copper selenide
0.05 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.025 M SeO2 and composition of thin films for the set of baths; with deposition time of
0.1 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.05 M SeO2 was poor and exhibits 20 min. is shown in Fig. 7 (a, b, c, and d) the plot shows
polycrystalline structure. Qualitatively, the interatomic absorption region in the range of 450–550 nm. For bath
spacing of poor crystalline structure would be relatively composition of 0.15 M CuSO4 5H2O þ0.075 M SeO2 and
long and more disordered than crystalline structure due to composition of 0.2 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.1 M SeO2 with dep-
the absence of long-range translational periodicity. As the osition time of 20 min. there is shift of absorption shoulder
fraction of poor crystalline copper selenide phase increases towards higher wavelength side. This shift of absorbance
in the films, the extended localization in the conduction to edge of higher wavelength is attributed to the quantum
and valence bands increases [16,17]. As a result, the size effect due to higher bath concentration of CuSO4 and
absorption of photon is mainly contributed by poor crys- SeO2.
talline copper selenide and hence the absorption edge
blue-shifted [17]. On the other hand, for samples grown at 3.7. Compositional analysis
higher concentration of CuSO4 and SeO2 for bath composi-
tion of 0.15 M CuSO4 5H2O þ0.075 M SeO2 and composi- The sample was characterized by Energy-Dispersive X-ray
tion of 0.2 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.1 M SeO2 the crystallinity of Analysis. The compositional analysis of as-deposited copper
copper selenide thin films becomes better. Qualitatively, selenide for bath composition of 0.05 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ
the interatomic spacing of better crystalline structure of 0.025 M SeO2; composition of 0.1 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.05 M
copper selenide would be relatively more ordered than SeO2; composition of 0.15 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.075 M SeO2
poor crystalline structure of copper selenide due to the and composition of 0.2 M CuSO4.5 þ0.1 M SeO2 with deposi-
presence of long-range translational periodicity. As the tion time of 20 min. was carried out as shown in Fig. 8 (a, b, c,
fraction of better crystalline copper selenide phase dec- and d).The ratio between the copper and selenide peaks
reases in the films, the extended localization in the should be near about one. From the graph, it is noted that
conduction and valence bands decreases [16,17]. The for bath composition of 0.05 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.025 M SeO2;
optical band gap energy reduces to that of the crystall- the atomic percentage of copper is 45.95, while that of selenide
ine copper selenide. It has been reported that the thermal is 54.05, for bath composition of 0.1 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.05 M
stability and the band gaps of copper selenides vary SeO2; the atomic percentage of copper is 47.80, while that
depending on their stoichiometries or phases [16,17]. of selenide is 52.20, for bath composition of 0.15 M
Similar values of the band gap energy of copper selenide CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.075 M SeO2; the atomic percentage of copper
54 S.S. Dhasade et al. / Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 30 (2015) 48–55
Fig. 8. EDAX patterns of copper selenide thin films for (a) bath composition of 0.05 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.025 M SeO2; (b) bath composition of 0.1 M
CuSO4 5H2Oþ0.05 M SeO2; (c) bath composition of 0.15 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.075 M SeO2 and (d) bath composition of 0.2 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.1 M SeO2, with
deposition time of 20 min.
is 50.39, while that of selenide is 49.61 and for bath composi- technique. CuSe nanorods are polycrystalline in nature and
tion of 0.2 M CuSO4 5H2Oþ 0.1 M SeO2; the atomic percen- size of nanorods depends on the precursors concentrations.
tage of copper is 54.43, while that of selenide is 45.57. From The band gap of copper selenide depends on their stoichio-
these percentages, it is to be realized that copper selenide thin metries. The optical band gap of as deposited CuSe thin film
films are nearly stoichiometric. changes from 2.35 eV to 2.54 eV. So, precursor concentra-
tion influence on the structural, morphological and optical
4. Conclusions properties of CuSe thin films. These properties play an
important role in the device fabrication. These fundamental
It is concluded that, as deposited copper selenide (CuSe) properties provide basic information for the solar cell
thin films successfully deposited by the electrodeposition fabrication which is prime requirement for the engineers.
S.S. Dhasade et al. / Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 30 (2015) 48–55 55
The optical properties of such films make them suitable for [8] G. Xiao, J. Ning, Z. Liu, Y. Sui, Y. Wang, Q. Dong, W. Tian, B. Liu, G. Zou,
solar control coatings and photovoltaic devices. The elec- B. Zou, CrystEngComm 14 (2012) 2139–2144.
[9] R. Bari, V. Ganesan, S. Potadar, L. Patil, Bull. Mater. Sci. 32 (2009)
trodeposition method is constructive for preparation of 37–42.
large area nano rods. [10] S. Ambade, R. Mane, S. Kale, S. Sonawane, A. Shaikh, S. Han, Appl.
Surf. Sci. 253 (2006) 2123–2126.
[11] M. Razak, Z. Zainal, Malays. J. Anal. Sci. 11 (2007) 324–330.
References [12] V. Garcma, P. Nair, M. Nair, J. Cryst. Growth 203 (1999) 113–124.
[13] H. Shen, H. Wang, H. Yuan, L. Ma, L. Song Li, CrystEngComm 14
[1] C. Hessel, V. Pattani, M. Rasch, M. Panthani, B. Koo, Nano Lett. 11 (2012) 555–560.
(2011) 2560–2566. [14] M. Lakshmi, K. Bindu, S. Bini, K. Vijayakumar, C. Kartha, T. Abe,
[2] B. Yu, W. Liu, S. Chen, H. Wang, H. Wang, G. Chen, Z. Ren, Nano Y. Kashiwaba, Thin Solid Films 370 (2000) 89–95.
Energy 1 (2012) 472–478. [15] S. Gosavi, N. Deshpande, Y. Gudage, R. Sharma, J. Alloy Compd. 448
[3] D. Chen, G. Chen, R. Jin, H. Xua, CrystEngComm 16 (2014) 2810–2817. (2008) 344–348.
[4] K. Murali, R. Xavier, Chalcogenides Lett. 6 (2009) 683–687. [16] S. Dhasade, J. Patil, J. Kim, S. Han, M. Rath, V. Fulari, Mater. Chem.
[5] Z. Wang, F. Peng, Y. Wu, L. Yang, F. Zhang, J. Huang, CrystEngComm Phys. 137 (2012) 353–358.
14 (2012) 3528–3533. [17] A. Schafer, M. Kollwitz, R. Ahlrichs, J. Chem. Phys. 104 (1996)
[6] Z. Deng, M. Mansuripur, A. Muscat, J. Mater. Chem. 19 (2009) 7113–7116.
6201–6206. [18] A. Hermann, L. Fabick, J. Cryst. Growth 61 (1983) 658–664.
[7] J. Choi, N. Kang, H. Yang, H. Kim, S. Son, Chem. Mater. 22 (2010) [19] Y. Wang, N. Herron, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 95 (1991) 525–532.
3586–3588. [20] S. Dhasade, S. Han, V. Fulari, J. Semicond. 33 (2012) 93002–93006.