Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 83 views

    Line Lubricant Testing

    Uploaded by

    Piyalarp Ludeelerd
    ISBT: line lubricant PET compatibility testing recommended method. Document may not be reproduced in its entirety, except for translating into another language. 4 bins of 24 bottles each will be tested for each condition including controls. Bottles should be less than 1 year old and should be stored at below 80F until used.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Line Lubricant Testing

    Uploaded by

    Piyalarp Ludeelerd
    83 views5 pages
    ISBT: line lubricant PET compatibility testing recommended method. Document may not be reproduced in its entirety, except for translating into another language. 4 bins of 24 bottles each will be tested for each condition including controls. Bottles should be less than 1 year old and should be stored at below 80F until used.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    ISBT: line lubricant PET compatibility testing recommended method. Document may not be reproduced in its entirety, except for translating into another language. 4 bins of 24 bottles each will be tested for each condition including controls. Bottles should be less than 1 year old and should be stored at below 80F until used.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    83 views5 pages

    Line Lubricant Testing

    Uploaded by

    Piyalarp Ludeelerd
    ISBT: line lubricant PET compatibility testing recommended method. Document may not be reproduced in its entirety, except for translating into another language. 4 bins of 24 bottles each will be tested for each condition including controls. Bottles should be less than 1 year old and should be stored at below 80F until used.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 5

    Line Lubricant

    PET Compatibilty
    Testing
    Recommended Method

    ISBT Document: #
    Revision: 1.0
    © ISBT – 2007
    International Society of Beverage Technologists

    Line Lubricant PET Compatibility Testing: Recommended Method

    Copyright © 2007 by the International Society of Beverage Technologists (ISBT).


    All rights reserved.

    Portions of this document may be used in other publications by including the


    following statement: ‡ Original Source: ISBT Line Lubricant PET Compatibility Recommended Method
    Revision 0 © 2007

    This document may not be reproduced in its entirety, except for the purpose of translating into
    another language. Non-English translations must include the following statement:
    ‡ Original Source: ISBT ISBT Line Lubricant PET Compatibility Recommended Method Revision 0 © 2007.
    The ISBT is not responsible for the accuracy of this translation from original English source text. It is up to the
    user of this translated document to ensure that it corresponds with the most current version of the ISBT source
    document.

    Complete English-language documents may be obtained online from the ISBT at


    www.bevtech.org.

    Revision # Release Date Revision Notes


    Packaging Technical Committee, Line Lubricant Sub-
    0 - Original 2007/10/01
    committee recommended method.

    International Society of Beverage Technologists


    3340 Pilot Knob Road T : +1 – 352 – 382 - 2008
    St. Paul, MN 55121 USA F : +1 – 352 – 382 – 2018
    www.bevtech.org

    Line Lubricant Compatibility Testing: Recommended Method


    © ISBT – 2007 Page 1
    International Society of Beverage Technologists

    [email protected]

    Pur pose
    The purpose of this test method is to measure the compatibility of chemical solutions with PET
    bottles filled with carbonated soft drinks.

    It is important that compositions are compared side by side to each other. Compatibility
    of a current composition can be compared to that of a previously evaluated composition if both
    compositions were run side by side against both a positive (bottles don’t break) and a negative
    (bottles break) control.

    1.0 Te s t i n g P r o c e d u r e
    1.1 Materials
    For each condition including controls, 4 bins of 24 bottles each will be tested. For each condition,
    the following materials are required:
    1. NaHCO3. Use Aldrich catalog number S6014 (Sodium bicarbonate ACS reagent, 99.7-
    100.3%)
    2. Deionized or distilled water
    3. 96 twenty ounce bottles. Bottles should be less than 1 year old and should be stored at
    below 80F until used.
    4. Four standard bus bins. Use part number 5596325, available from Sysco, Houston TX.
    5. Four heavy duty polyethylene trash bags.
    6. Chemicals for generating CO2 in situ or carbonating equipment. In situ CO2 generation
    requires 10.6 g sodium bicarbonate, 10.6 g citric acid, and approximately 150 g of ice per
    bottle charged (1/3 pound).
    7. Crown Cork and Seal 28 mm plain lined closures – part number PG-183.
    8. Torque driver (manual or air driven)
    9. Humidity chamber (capable to maintain 100F/85% RH)

    2.0 Procedure
    2.1 – Day 1
    1. Charge bottles. When correctly charged, the bottles will have 70 psi gauge pressure at
    70 F. Pressure should be measured using a Zahm-Nagel device that pierces the bottle
    cap, and the bottle and Zahm-Nagel apparatus should be shaken after the cap is pierced
    to equilibrate CO2 in the aqueous and gas phases. At altitudes greater than about 3000
    feet, the bottles pressure should be measured at 100 F to minimize differences in gauge
    pressure related to lower ambient barometric pressure.
    a. Chemical carbonation: Charge bottle with 568 g of ice water, 10.6 g sodium
    bicarbonate, and 10.6 g citric acid. Immediately after charging citric acid, seal the

    Line Lubricant Compatibility Testing: Recommended Method


    © ISBT – 2007 Page 2
    International Society of Beverage Technologists

    bottle as quickly as possible. The best way to seal bottles is with an air driver with a
    clutch that delivers a pre-set torque equal to 16 in-lb.
    b. Direct carbonation: adjust carbon dioxide pressure, water feed rate, and water
    temperature to achieve 70 + 2 psi gauge pressure in bottles at 70 F. Once the
    correct pressure has been achieved in 5 successive bottles, begin filling bottles to put
    on test. Save every 10th bottle for monitoring pressure using the Zahm-Nagel
    c. 96 bottles should be charged for each test condition and each control
    2. Rinse bottles with deionized water. In the case of chemically carbonated bottles, shake
    to dissolve chemicals.
    3. Age charged bottles overnight at room temperature.
    4. Prepare chamber for use – the chamber should be equilibrated at 100F/85% RH.

    2.2 Day 2 Prepare test solutions


    1. Positive deionized water control – use either deionized or distilled water
    2. Negative 100 ppm alkaline solution control - (100 ppm alkalinity as CaCO3) – dilute 0.168
    g of Aldrich catalog number S6014 NaHCO3 to 1000 g with deionized or distilled water.
    3. Test lubricant test solution – dilute the lubricant concentrate with the correct amount of
    either deionized water or 50 ppm alkaline water to give the expected use concentration of
    lubricant.
    4. Comparison lubricant test solution – the test lubricant solution can be compared head to
    head against a comparison lubricant test solution instead of against controls. In the case
    of head to head lube comparisons, positive and negative controls can be omitted. To
    prepare the comparison lubricant test solution, dilute the lubricant concentrate with the
    correct amount of either deionized water, 50 ppm alkaline water, or ISBT recommended
    alkaline water (the same diluent must be used as for the test lubricant solution in step 3.
    above) to give the expected use concentration of lubricant.

    2.3 Dip bottles and place in bins


    1. Use polypropylene garbage bags to line bins.
    2. Place approximately 132 g of test solution into a cylindrical container approximately 6
    inches in diameter. The height of the liquid should be sufficient that a bottle can be
    dipped in to a depth equal to the seam between the base and the sidewall.
    3. Dip each charged and aged bottle into the test solution and swirl for about 2 seconds and
    place directly into lined bin.
    4. Once all 24 bottles are in a bin, pour the remaining part of the 132 g solution.
    5. Repeat steps i. – iv. for three times for each composition prepare in a. above until a total
    of four bins of 24 bottles each has been prepared for each experimental condition and
    each control.

    Line Lubricant Compatibility Testing: Recommended Method


    © ISBT – 2007 Page 3
    International Society of Beverage Technologists

    Place bins and bottles into the humidity chamber at 100F/85% relative humidity.

    2.4 Day 3 and Subsequent Days


    1. Daily (except on weekends and non-working days) – check each bin for failed bottles and
    soft bottles and record. Failed bottles are those that have lost liquid contents through
    cracks at the base. Soft bottles are those that have lost pressure either through cracks
    above the liquid level or through the closure but have not lost liquid. Continue testing of
    bottles for 28 days.

    3.0 Te s t C o m p l e t i o n
    1. Empty bottles. Cut off and save bases.
    2. Compile record of failures/day for each bin.
    3. Report failure rate as number of failed bottles/96, soft bottles as number of soft
    bottles/96, average temperature and standard deviation, and average % relative humidity
    and standard deviation.

    4.0 Data anal ysis

    Line Lubricant Compatibility Testing: Recommended Method


    © ISBT – 2007 Page 4

    You might also like