Seismic Analysis of A Multi-Storey Building With Tuned Mass Dampers
Seismic Analysis of A Multi-Storey Building With Tuned Mass Dampers
Seismic Analysis of A Multi-Storey Building With Tuned Mass Dampers
Mass Dampers
A Project Report
by
Antony Thomas
Leonstein Jose
Mathew Abraham Vellapally
V Vinayak Shenoy
A Project Report
by
RSET Mission
To impart state-of-the-art knowledge to individuals in various technological
disciplines and to inculcate in them a high degree of social consciousness and
human values, thereby enabling them to face the challenges of life with courage and
conviction.
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Vision
The department strives to excel in the areas of academia, research and industry by
moulding professionals in the field of Civil Engineering to build a sustainable world.
Mission
To impart quality education and mould technically sound, ethically responsible
professionals in the field of Civil Engineering with a broad skill set of creativity,
critical thinking and effective communication skills to meet the desired needs of the
society within realistic socio-economic environmental constraints.
Within a few years of graduation, the candidate is expected to have achieved the following
objectives:
PEO 1: Knowledge in Civil Engineering: Graduates shall attain state of the art
knowledge in the various fields of Civil Engineering and will take every opportunity
coming their way to augment the already existing knowledge.
PEO 2: Successful in career: Graduates shall achieve successful career which they
will be able to commit to with responsibility and passion
5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources,
and modern engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to
complex engineering activities with an understanding of the limitations.
6. The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge
to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.
PSO 1: Structural Analysis & Design Skills: Acquire ability to analyze, design
and develop feasible solutions with emphasis to earthquake resistant design.
CERTIFICATE
Dynamic loads such as wind and earthquakes can set a building in motion (vibration) and if these
motions are kept unchecked; it can even damage the building. Tuned mass damper is a device
mounted in structures to reduce the amplitude of these vibrations. Their application can prevent
discomfort, damage, or outright structural failure.
The prime objective of this project is to evaluate the performance of the building with and without
tuned mass dampers. A structure vibrates in its natural frequency and this natural frequency is a
function of its stiffness and mass. Once the natural frequency is known, a suitable Tuned Mass Damper
(TMD) can be designed. The multi-storey structure is designed using SAP2000. The methods to
evaluate the structure include simulating an earthquake case on both damped and undamped
structure. Also, the peak acceleration, peak displacement, response spectrum and base shear are
obtained using the software. These values are then compared to find the difference in the behaviour
of structure with and without dampers.
The expected outcome includes considerable decrease in peak deflection and acceleration. As a result
a decrease in peak response of the structure to the ground excitation and significant decrease in base
shear is also expected.
ii
Acknowledgement
Foremost, We would like to thank and praise God, who has abundantly showered his blessings
throughout this project.
We would like to express our special gratitude to our guide Ms. Tressa Kurian, Assistant Professor,
Department of Civil Engineering, Rajagiri school of Engineering and Technology, Kakkanad for the
continuous support of our project , for her patience, motivation, enthusiasm, and immense
knowledge. Her guidance helped us in all the time of research for this project. We could not have
imagined having a better guide and mentor for our project.
We express our sincere gratitude to Prof. (Dr). P. S. Sreejith, Principal, Rajagiri School of Engineering
and Technology, Kakkanad for providing us with the wonderful opportunity, the means and resources
for the completion of this project.
We would like to thank Prof. Vincent K. John, Head of Civil Engineering Department, Rajagiri school of
Engineering and Technology, Kakkanad for the wholehearted support for the successful completion
of our project.
Any attempt at any level cannot be satisfactorily completed without the support and guidance of our
parents, teachers and friends.we would like to thank our parents, teachers and friends who helped us
a lot in gathering different information and for their moral support.
Thanking you,
Antony Thomas
Leonstein Jose
Mathew Abraham Vellapally
V.Vinayak Shenoy
iii
Table of Contents
Page
Certificate i
Abstract ii
Acknowledgement iii
Table of Contents iv
List of Tables vi
List of Figures vii
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Types of TMD 1
1.1.1 Passive TMD system 2
1.1.2 Active TMD system 2
1.1.3 Translational TMD system 3
1.1.4 Pendulum TMD system 3
Chapter 4: Validation
4.1 Example problem 10
4.2 Result and conclusion 11
Chapter 5: Methodology
5.1 Literature review 12
5.2 Data collection 12
5.3 Modelling of building 12
5.3.1 Details of building 12
5.3.2 Input loading 16
5.3.3 Analysis 16
iv
7.3 Defining frame sections 18
7.4 Defining load patterns 19
7.5 Defining the shear wall 19
7.6 Assigning the diaphragm 20
7.7 Defining staircase 20
7.8 Assigning loads 21
7.9 Checking stability of the structure 21
7.10 Defining response spectrum function 21
7.11 Defining earthquake load patterns 22
7.12 Defining and assigning wind load patterns 22
7.13 Preliminary analysis results 22
7.14 Design of TMD 22
7.15 Defining ground excitation 23
Chapter 8: Results
8.1 Responses in X direction
8.1.1 Displacement 24
8.1.2 Base shear 26
8.1.3 Acceleration 28
8.1.4 Response spectrum 30
8.2 Responses in Y direction
8.2.1 Displacement 32
8.2.2 Base shear 33
8.2.3 Acceleration 34
8.2.4 Response spectrum 35
Chapter 9: Conclusion
36
Chapter 10: Scope for future Enhancement
37
Reference 38
Project 39
outcomes
v
List of Tables
vi
List of Figures
vii
Chapter 1 Introduction
1 Introduction
Now-a-days innumerable high rise buildings have been constructed all over the world and the
number is increasing day by day. This is not only due to concerns over high density of population
in the cities, commercial zones and space saving but also to establish country landmarks and to
prove that their countries are up to the standards. As the seismic load acting on a structure is a
function of the self-weight of the structure these structures are made comparatively light and
flexible which have relatively low natural damping. Results make the structures more vibration
prone under earthquake loading. In many cases this type of large displacements may not be a
threat to integrity of the structure but a steady state of vibration can cause considerable
discomfort and even illness to the building occupant.
In every field in the world conservation of energy is followed. If the energy imposed on the
structure by earthquake load is fully dissipated in some way the structure will vibrate less. Every
structure naturally releases some energy through various mechanisms such as internal stressing,
rubbing, and plastic deformation. In large modern structures, the total damping is almost 5% of
the critical. So new generation high rise buildings are equipped with artificial damping devices
for vibration control through energy dissipation.
A tuned mass damper (TMD is a passive damping system which utilizes a secondary mass
attached to a main structure normally through spring and dashpot to reduce the dynamic
response of the structure. It is widely used for vibration control in mechanical engineering
systems. Nowadays TMD theory has been adopted to reduce vibration of tall buildings and other
civil engineering structures. The secondary mass system is designed to have a natural frequency,
which is dependent on its mass and stiffness, tuned to that of the primary structure. When that
particular frequency of the structure gets excited the TMD will resonate out of phase with the
structural motion and reduce its response. Then, the excess energy that is built up in the structure
can be transferred to a secondary mass and is dissipated by the dashpot due to relative motion
between them at a later time. Mass of the secondary system varies from 1-10% of the structural
mass.
A TMD is an inertial mass attached to the building location with maximum motion, through a
properly tuned spring and damping element. Tuned mass damper is a device consisting of mass,
spring, and damper that are attached to a structure in order to reduce the dynamic response of
the structure shown in figure 1.1.
Passive systems are characterized by the absence of an external source of energy. As a result
overall system stability is usually not a concern. A passive TMD system is any TMD topology
which does not contain any active element, such as an actuator. As a result these systems are
entirely mechanical. But it’s relatively cheaper.
An ATMD system, as shown in Figure 1.2, contains an actuator which drives the motion of either
the TMD mass or an auxiliary mass connected to the TMD mass. By actively controlling the
motion of an external mass, the ATMD can control the forces exerted on the structure.
In bidirectional systems, the mass can move along both coordinate axes. In either topology a set
of springs and dampers are placed between the TMD mass and the supporting structure which
is fixed to the structure
PTMDs replace the translational spring and damper system with a pendulum, which consists of
a mass supported by a cable which pivots about a point, as illustrated in Figure 1.4. They are
commonly modelled as a simple pendulum.
For small angular oscillations they will behave similarly to a translational TMD and can be
modelled identically with an equivalent stiffness and equivalent damping ratio. Hence, the
design methodology for both the translational TMD system and PTMD systems are identical.
A major motivating factor for using a PTMD system over an equivalent translational TMD system
is the absence of any bearings to support the TMD mass. The bearing support structure used in
the translational TMD assembly is expensive and susceptible to wear over the lifespan of the TMD
system. As a result PTMD designs can be less expensive to manufacture and last longer.
Nearly 50% of structures in Japan that use TMD systems utilize PTMD systems. Examples
include Crystal Tower in Osaka, Higashimyama Sky Tower in Nagoya, and Taipei 101 in Taipei .
Hence, we decided to use the PTMD system for our seismic analysis of a 40 storey building.
2 Literature Review
● Seismic Analysis of High-Rise Buildings (G+30) by Using ETABS by DR. K.
Chandrashekar Reddy and G. Lalith Kumar, 2019
The paper aims to analyze a high-rise building of 30 floors (G+30) by considering seismic,
dead and live loads. The design criteria for high-rise buildings are strength, serviceability
and stability. The version of the software used is ETABS 2016.In the present study, we are
mainly determining the effects of lateral loads on moments, shear force, axial force, base
shear, maximum displacement and tensile forces on structural system are subjected and
also comparing the results of seismic zones 2, 3, 4 and 5. The seismic analysis was carried
out for the buildings that have lack of resistance to earthquake forces. Seismic analysis
considers seismic effects hence the exact analysis sometimes becomes complex. Story
drifts for top 10 floors and base reactions were analyzed in seismic zones 2 to 5.Behavior
of the high rise building was shown clearly using the graphs and lateral displacements. It
is found that the lateral displacements or drifts are more in zone 5 when compared to
zones 4, 3&2. It is also found that from the base reactions of structure obtained in zone 5,
the story shear is higher in zone 5 than in zone 2. The members which are not appropriate
will be obtained and suitable sections are recommended by the software.
● Seismic Analysis of Multistoried Building by Mahesh N. Patil, Yogesh N.
Sonawane,2015
The effective design and the construction of earthquake resistant structures have much
greater importance all over the world. In this paper, the earthquake response of a
symmetric multi-storey building is studied by manual calculation and with the help of
ETABS 9.7.1 software. The method includes a seismic coefficient method as recommended
by IS 1893:2002. The responses obtained by manual analysis as well as by soft computing
are compared. This paper provides a complete guide line for manual as well as software
analysis of seismic coefficient method. A 22.5m x 22.5m, 8 storey structure is modeled
using ETABS software. The height of each storey is taken as 3meter making the total
height of the structure 24 meter. Analysis of the structure is done and then the results
generated by this software are compared with manual analysis of the structure using IS
1893:2002.
● Analysis of multistoried building with and without tuned mass damper by Shubham
Sonawane and Rohan Kumar Choudhary
A TMD is an inertial mass attached to the building location with maximum motion,
through a properly tuned spring and damping element. Tuned mass damper is a device
consisting of mass, spring, and damper that are attached to a structure in order to reduce
the dynamic response of the structure. In this study, the effect of Tuned mass damper on
the response of structure was also response spectrum and time history analysis of multi-
storey building frame with and without damper was performed in ETABS software.
Moreover, base shear and displacement was studied. A reinforced concrete frame
building with a simple symmetric plan is selected. Height of each story is 3m. The building
with plan dimensions (24m x 40m) was modelled in ETABS.It was assumed that columns
are inextensible, slab is rigid and self-weight of columns is null. Following results were
obtained from this study
● Tuned mass damper can be successfully used to control structural excitation
● 3% of mass of damper is found effective in reducing displacement of top story.
● Storey shear values for reinforced concrete buildings with tuned mass damper are
minimum in both directions.
Tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are a type of passive damping systems that attaches to the main
structure as a secondary mass and reduces the dynamic response of the structure through
damping and stiffness, which is widely used in control engineering systems and other civil
engineering structures. Tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are generally installed at the rooftops of
buildings to control the responses of buildings produced due to wind or an earthquake. TMDs
may be installed in other structures also, such as, flexible bridges (suspension/cable-stayed
bridges) to control the wind induced vibration . The most important feature of the TMDs\ is the
tuning of frequencies, that is, the frequency of the TMD is made equal to the fundamental
frequency of the structure. Because of various uncertainties inherent in the properties of both the
TMD and the structure, perfect tuning is very difficult to achieve. As a consequence, multi-tuned
mass dampers (MTMDs) have been developed for better tuning. Diagrammatic representation of
TMD in structure is shown in Figure 3.1.
Within SAP2000 or ETABS, a TMD may be modeled using a spring-mass system with damping.
Guidelines for this subsystem are described as follows:
● Spring – Assign spring properties to a linear two-joint link object in which one joint is
attached to the structure, and the other joint is free.
● Mass – Mass and weight are then assigned to the free joint.
● Damping – Within SAP2000, linear damping is included directly in the linear link
property
3.2.1 Procedure
Any spring-mass system may represent the swinging pendulum in 2D. Here, spring constant is
given as Mg/L, where M is mass, L is pendulum length, and g is gravity. In this case, a linear link
is created to represent the pendulum device. Select Define > Section Properties > Link/Support
Properties, then define translational stiffnesses along U1, U2, and U3. The linear stiffness along
U1 represents axial properties, and should be based on the EA/L value of the hangers. The linear
stiffness properties of U2 and U3 are chosen as Mg/L.
● Length – Pendulum length directly affects the period of the TMD. This is accounted for in
the spring and mass properties used.
● Mass – Mass strongly affects how the TMD influences response. Changes to mass must be
accounted for in the following locations:
● Mass (M) should be assigned to the free joint (J-end of the link).
● Weight (W = Mg) should be assigned to the free joint (J-end of the link) as a joint
force load in the gravity direction in any self-weight load pattern.
● Effective stiffness (Mg/L) of the U2 and U3 link properties.
● Period – Generally, the period (T) of the TMD is chosen to closely match the structural
period to be counteracted, taken as the first period of vibration of the control model. . The
period of the TMD is given by:
● Once the period of the TMD is derived, TMD length is calculated from this value and
gravity. This length, along with gravity and the arbitrary mass value, are then converted
into the effective link stiffness of the U2 and U3 directions, given as Mg/L. This being the
case, the length of the TMD in the real structure is not explicitly modeled, but is accounted
for in the link property.
4 Validation
For validation, an example from “Seismic analysis of structures” by T.K Dutta was chosen. In this
example question (example 9.5 pg 408) multiple storey 2D frame was excited with El Centro
accelerogram and it’s displacement vs time graphs were plotted.
The building frame shown in Figure 4.1 is provided with a tuned mass damper (TMD) to control
its response. Using the direct method of analysis, compare between the controlled and
uncontrolled responses for the El Centro earthquake. Mass of the TMD is 5% of the total mass of
the structure . Figure 4.2 shows the text book answer.
The above structure was modelled in SAP2000 with and without equipping TMD and
displacement vs time graphs were plotted for both the cases. Following answer Figure 4.3 was
obtained.
Even though textbook answers were obtained from MATLAB, It was observed that both the
textbook and experimental results were similar. Hence the method used to model the TMD in
SAP2000 was found to be functional.
5 Methodology
5.1 LITERATURE REVIEW
To gather various types of work on seismic analysis of high-rise structures and on tuned mass
dampers various papers, thesis and research articles were studied thoroughly and referred to.
The idea behind doing literature review was to collect data and have understanding on different
methods and approaches that can be used, to clearly understand the software requirement of the
project. Literature review was done to have thorough guidelines during the entire project work.
The earthquakes considered in this work are the time history of ground motion as per IS 1893:2002
(Part-I).
5.3.MODELING OF BUILDING
A symmetrical building of plan 25m x 25m located in zone IV, India is modelled. Five bays of
length 5m are provided both along X - direction and Y - direction. Shear Wall is provided at all 4
sides of the building model.
For analysis, a 40 storey building is modelled in SAP2000. The building has a height of 140m with
a floor height of 3.5m. The building is analyzed by Response Spectrum Analysis, which is a linear
dynamic analysis. The specifications of the frame are given in Table 5.1. This building consists of
parking space from basement to 4th floors , commercial space from 4th to 15th floors and residential
space from 15th to 40th floors. So, 3 plans were prepared for the same. The plans, elevation and the
model of the building is shown in Figure 5.1 to Figure 5.5
Number of floor 40
Site details
Load combinations
5.3.3 Analysis:-
In this study, 40 storied RC buildings have been analyzed using the response spectra method in
SAP2000. The plan and elevation of the building taken for analysis is shown above. In the
earthquake analysis along with earthquake loads, vertical loads are also applied. For the
earthquake analysis, IS 1893-2016 code was used. Seismic analysis considers dynamic effects
however, linear static analysis is carried for simple and low-rise buildings whereas Dynamic
analysis is carried out for high rise structures and seismic prone areas. Dynamic analysis is done
by Response Spectrum Method in SAP2000 which indicates maximum values of Response in the
structure. For the purpose of design of the structure Indian Standard Codes are referred.
A range of innovative analysis techniques are integrated into the capabilities of SAP2000. Users
are free to supplement the standard yet sophisticated analysis process by implementing advanced
features for nonlinear and dynamic consideration. This versatility makes SAP2000 a practical and
productive tool for any analysis type ranging from simple static, linear-elastic to more complex
dynamic, nonlinear-inelastic Dynamic methods include response spectrum, power-spectral-
density and steady-state and time history analysis.
At first, the basic grid that will serve as a template for developing the model is defined. This is
done by opening a New Model in the software window and laying out the grid by defining major
geometrical aspects of the model. The number of grid lines is set to 6 in the X and Y direction, and
to 41 in the Z directions. And then the spacing in the X, Y and Z directions is specified.
Used the Define menu to add, modify, or delete a material property. The material property
definitions are then used in defining the structural objects. Material properties like unit weight,
Poisson’s ratio, grade of steel and concrete is defined at this step.
Material properties
Frame section properties are defined on the basis of their dimensions, grade of materials etc.
Defining a frame section makes the section available for assignment to selected frame objects.
Various frame sections used during modeling the building are shown in table 7.1 .
The loads used in this problem consist of dead, dead wall, dead slab, dead floor finish, dead and
live roof loads acting in the gravity direction. The Load Pattern command is used to define
various Load Patterns as shown in figure 7.1.
M50 grade 300 mm RCC shear wall was defined in the software. Shear wall was then assigned
symmetrically at four sides of the building. Blue shaded region in figure 7.2 represents the shear
wall.
Diaphragm is a structural element that transmits lateral loads to the vertical resisting elements of
a structure such as shear walls or frames. Each floor which was defined was assigned a
diaphragm . A diaphragm constraint creates links between joints located within a plane such that
they move together as a planar diaphragm.
Using the Specifications shown in table 7.2 a staircase was designed in SAP2000. Figure 7.3 and
figure 7.4 shows the plan and 3D model of a staircase respectively.
In this Step, the Dead and Live loads will be applied to the model. Dead load was auto assigned
by SAP2000. Superimposed Dead Loads (SIDL) of brick walls applied on corresponding beams.
And then live loads and SIDL were applied on slabs
Stability of the building ensured after assigning all the members and the loads to the model.
Analysis for instability was done using the software
In response spectrum function definition form seismic zone iv is selected because building is
located in zone IV hence Seismic zone factor is taken as 0.24. As for importance factor 1.5 and
response reduction factor is taken as 5.
Seismic load was added along X and Y direction and then seismic load cases considering
eccentricity of 0.05 is added. Top Story and Bottom Story are selected to specify the elevation
range over which the automatic static lateral loads are calculated. Time period was calculated by
the software.
Wind load was defined based on IS:875 2015.Basic wind speed found from wind map and
factored. Design wind pressure was calculated for each floor as shown in table 7.3 . Calculated
wind pressure was assigned to the diaphragm. The rigid diaphragm assumption assumes the
edge of the building cladding is at the edge of the diaphragm.
The Tuned Mass Damper was designed with various mass ratios such as 2.5%,5% and 7.5%. The
stiffness is determined for each mass ratio.
8 Results
8.1 RESPONSES IN X -DIRECTION
8.1.1 Displacement
Displacement-time graphs show how the displacement of moving objects changes with time.
From the time history analysis of the structure, displacement-time graphs in X- direction were
obtained. Time history analysis is carried out with various mass percentages of Tuned Mass
Damper.. Figures 8.1 and 8.2 show the displacement -time graphs in X- axis.
By comparing the results obtained from analysis of structure with and without tuned mass
damper, the percentage reduction in displacement increased with TMD mass. The peak
displacement value obtained in X-direction without Tuned mass damper is 3.73 e-02 m and that
of with tuned mass damper is 3.193 e-02 m. Figure 8.3 shows the comparison of peak
displacements for various TMD masses.
Base shear is an estimate of the maximum expected lateral force on the base of the structure due
to seismic activity. From the time history analysis of structure, base shear - time graphs in X-
direction were obtained. Time history analysis was carried out with various mass percentages of
Tuned Mass Damper. Base shear-time graphs Figure 8.4 and 8.5 show the base shear-time graph
for various TMD masses.
By comparing the base shear vs time graphs for various TMD masses , it was found that base
shear had significant reduction with increased percentage of TMD mass but a moderate increase
was found for 7.5 % TMD mass.This increase is due to the increase of overall mass of the
structure. The peak base shear value obtained in X-direction without Tuned mass damper is 3.01
e03 kN and that of with tuned mass damper is 2.19 e03 kN. Figure 8.6 shows the comparison of
peak base shears for various TMD masses.
8.1.3 Acceleration
Acceleration vs time graph shows change in acceleration with respect to time. From the time
history analysis of the structure , acceleration vs time graphs in X direction were obtained. Figure
8.7 and 8.8 shows acceleration - time graph of various TMD masses.
By comparing the acceleration vs time graphs for various TMD masses, the percentage reduction
in acceleration increased with TMD mass.The peak acceleration value obtained in X-direction
without Tuned mass damper is 2.73 e-01 m/s² and that of with tuned mass damper is 2.68 e-01
m/s². Figure 8.9 shows the comparison of peak accelerations for various TMD masses.
By comparing the response spectrum graphs for various TMD masses, the percentage reduction
in response spectrum increased with TMD mass.The peak response spectrum value obtained in
X-direction without Tuned mass damper is 2.8 e-01 m/s² and that of with tuned mass damper is
2.61 e-01 m/s². Figure 8.12 shows the comparison of peak response spectrum for various TMD
masses.
8.2.1 Displacement
From the time history analysis, displacement vs time graphs for Y- axis were obtained. Figure
8.13 shows displacement-time graph for various TMD masses in Y-direction.
By comparing the results obtained from analysis of structure with and without tuned mass
damper, the percentage reduction in displacement increased with TMD mass. The peak
displacement in Y-direction without Tuned mass damper is 3.52 e-02 m and that of with tuned
mass damper is 3.29 e-02 m. The results are similar to that obtained in X direction.
From the time history analysis of structure, base shear vs time graphs in Y- direction were
obtained. Figure 8.14 shows base shear-time graph in Y-axis.
By comparing the results obtained from analysis of structure with and without tuned mass
damper, the percentage reduction in base shear increased with TMD mass.The peak base shear
value obtained in Y-direction without Tuned mass damper is 2.00 e03 kN and that of with tuned
mass damper is 1.58 e03 kN.The results are similar to that obtained in X direction.
8.2.3 Acceleration
From the time history analysis of structure acceleration vs. time graphs for Y-axis were
obtained. Figure 8.15 shows the base acceleration vs time graph in Y-axis.
By comparing the results obtained from analysis of structure with and without tuned mass
damper, the percentage reduction in acceleration increased with TMD. The peak acceleration
value obtained in Y-direction without Tuned mass damper is 3.43 e-01 m/s² and that of with
tuned mass damper is 3.38 e-01 m/s².The results are similar to that obtained in X direction.
From the analysis of structure, response spectrum vs. frequency graphs of Y-axis were obtained.
This graph plots response spectrum values on the y-axis, and frequency values on the X-axis.
Figure 8.16 shows the response spectrum graph in Y-axis.
By comparing the results obtained from analysis of structure in Y-direction with and without
tuned mass damper, the percentage decrease in response spectrum value increases with TMD
mass.The peak response spectrum value obtained in Y-direction without Tuned mass damper is
1.83 m/s² and that of with tuned mass damper is 1.78 m/s². The results are similar to that
obtained in X direction.
9 Conclusion
After carrying out analysis of high rise building with and without damper results are obtained.
It was found that tuned mass damper was effective in reducing displacement, story drift and base
shear. This study was aimed to explore application of tuned mass damper in reducing structural
vibration caused due to external forces. Following are the conclusions made.
● TMD can be used to reduce tall structure motion that is caused by earthquakes and wind
action.
● The mass ratios of TMD play an important role in the overall design of TMD. Hence it
must be selected based on an optimization function where all the responses and costs are
parameters.
● Any structural engineer can use this paper as a guideline for seismic analysis of any
multistoried building.
● The responses of any building subjected to seismic, wind and live loads can be studied
with varying position of TMD.
● The results obtained by this method can be compared with results of Seismic Coefficient
Method and Time History Method.