Bloch Electrons in Magnetic Field
Bloch Electrons in Magnetic Field
Bloch Electrons in Magnetic Field
- Notice that (A) and (B) lead to the time dependence of k and r in the
presence external influences E and B
Semiclassical motion in uniform magnetic field
In the presence of a uniform magnetic field (B), the semi-classical equations are
dr/dt = v(k) = (1/ħ) ∂E/∂k ……… (1) ħdk/dt = - e(v x B) ………… (2)
→ the energy E(k) and the component of k along B (say, kz) are constants of motion!
and these conservation laws determine
the orbit of Bloch electrons in k-space
Simple cubic
Fig. 12.8
Real Space Orbit
From (2): ħdk/dt = - e(v x B)
Taking vector product with a unit vector b along B
Since the cross product of a unit vector with a perpendicular vector is simply the
second vector rotated by π/2 about the unit vector, so the projection of real space
orbit (Δrperp) in the plane perpendicular to B is simply the k-space orbit (Δk) rotated
by π/2 about B, and scaled by a factor (-ħ/eB)
The component of real space orbit parallel to B (say, z axis) is not so simply
described, since, z(t) = z(0) + ∫ vz dt (where, vz = (1/ħ) ∂E/∂kz ) need not be constant
(even though kz is), so the motion of electron along the field may not be uniform
Time period of the Bloch electron
For an orbit of energy E in a plane ┴r to B, the time ∆t, required to traverse from
k1 to k2 is k2
k2
∆t = ∫k
1
dk/|dk/dt| = (ħ/eB) ∫k dk/|(dr/dt) perp| [from 3]
1
k2
(∂E/∂k)perp is the component of gradient in the plane of the orbit (or vperp)
and causes k to change,
since, vparallel (being along B)
does not contribute to dk/dt
Interpretation of |(∂E/dk)perp|
Let ∆(k) be a vector in the plane
of the orbit and perpendicular
to it at k, which joins vector k
to a neighbouring orbit in the
same plane, but at a
different energy, E+∆E
∆E = (∂E/∂k).∆(k)
= (∂E/∂k)perp . ∆(k)
= |(∂E/∂k)perp| |∆(k)|
- where, ∂A/∂E is the rate at which the orbits sweep the area in a given plane, as
the energy is increased!
Thus, the time period of Bloch electrons is determined by ∂A/∂E
Similar oscillations were seen in many other physical quantities of other metals, e.g.,
thermal conductivity, thermoelectric voltage, sound attenuation, measured in the
presence of a magnetic field
- Similar effects were seen in many other metals, like, silver, rhenium, etc.
Peltier effect in zinc
Typical dHvA
Results
Attenuation of sound -
- Magnetoaccoustic effect
Rhenium
and
Silver
de-Hass van-Alphen Effect explained
- We have seen that Bloch electrons under the influence of a magnetic field move on
continuous paths perpendicular to B – This is not inconsistent with the discrete set of
k-vectors in reciprocal space, but recall that the discrete allowed values of k and the
use of kx, ky and kz arise essentially from three dimensional translational invariance
- To find the quantized energy levels, in principle, the SE must be solved for an
electron in a periodic potential in the presence of a magnetic field, which is a difficult
task, that has been accomplished for free electrons in a magnetic field
Free electrons in uniform magnetic field
- Landau’s theory
The orbital energy levels of an electron in a cubical box of sides L along x, y and z, in
the presence of a magnetic field B along z are given by 2 quantum numbers, kz and ν:
- Each level is highly degenerate and the number of levels with energy for a given ν
and kz is 2eBL2/h, which for a field of 1 kG and L = 1cm is ~ 1010
- The high degeneracy reflects the fact that a classical electron, with a given energy
spirals about a line parallel to z-axis and can have arbitrary x- and y- coordinates
Explanation:
- In the absence of a force in B direction, the motion along z is unaffected by the
field and continues to be governed by ħ2kz2/2m
- But the energy of motion perpendicular to the field is quantized in steps of ħωc ,
where, ωc is the frequency of classical motion – Orbit Quantization!
The set of all levels with a given ν (and arbitrary kz) is referred to collectively as the
νth Landau level