ISCC Research Manual

B. GUIDELINES FOR WRITING RESEARCH PROPOSALS

The ISCC Research Office shall adopt the IMRaD Format. IMRaD is an acronym for
Introduction – Method – Results – and – Discussion. The IMRaD format shall be used to
structure scientific article, research proposals and research reports. The language will be as
plain and as unambiguous as possible, and personal views and fanciful language are
discouraged in the IMRaD Format.

The Research Proposal shall contain the first two chapters of the research report, to wit:

CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

• This portion of the Introduction portrays the problem situation that shapes the justification
of the study. It should clearly identify and define the problematic that the study is
attempting to address
• Depict the problem in terms of global, national, regional, or local events or situations that
indicate that indeed a problem does exist that requires critical investigation
• Clinch this portion by justifying the need for research to address the problem.

Operational Definition of Terms. (Subsumed in the Background of the study)

• This presents a glossary of terms that must be understood by the reader. Only key terms
would be defined. The terms are to be defined operationally. This means that the terms
would be based on how these are used in the study

Theoretical Framework. (Subsumed in the Background of the study)

• This portion of the Introduction provides the theoretical foundation for the study. Identify
and describe the theories that account for the problem under investigation.
• From these, identify and describe the variables in the study and depict how these variables
will be used or interrelate in the form of a paradigm
• Minimum number of pages: 5-8 with documentations

Review of Related Literature (Subsumed in the Background of the Study)

• This portion of the study addresses each problem using the “library research approach.”
As such, it is thematically organized according to the logical construction of the
problem.
• Use main headings and subheadings corresponding to each specific problem.
• Clinch each portion by showing how your literary citations are related to the problem
being investigated. Thus, results of research studies similar to the proposed topic shall
be presented in this portion of the paper.

The Problem. State the general problem/ gaps in the knowledge/ general reasons for
conducting the study in one paragraph. The last paragraph of the proposal should contain a
compelling argument why the research is needed.

Page 1 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

Statement of the Problem/ Research Objectives. Research objectives refer to statements or

purposes for which the investigation or research study is to be conducted. These research
objectives describe the aims and goals which are expected to be attained as the end of the
research process. They are stated right after the well-defined problem on which they are based
from, and which they logically follow.

General Objectives- it is a broad statement of purpose which uses well-defined and

measurable concepts.

Specific Objectives- provides detailed accounts of the questions that are particular to
the topic under study.

Conceptual Framework- a graphic/visual representation of the expected relationships

between different variables and concepts investigated. This includes one or more formal
theories (in part or whole) as well as other concepts and empirical findings from the literature.
It is used to show relationships among these ideas and how they relate to the research study.

Assumptions. State the assumptions that serve as the basis for critical interrogation

Hypothesis. State the research hypothesis for each problem

Scope and Delimitations of the Study. For the scope, identify the coverage of the
study in terms of “what,” “where,” “when,” “who,” and “how”. The “scope” of the study states
up to what extent the research study covers.

• For delimitations, identify the constraints that limited the coverage of the study to what
it is. The constraints may come in the form of time, resources, materials, equipment,
references, manpower, finances, expertise, etc.

Significance of the Study. This portion identifies the beneficiaries or stakeholders who will
be benefited from the findings of the study and a description of the corresponding that each of
the beneficiaries or stakeholders would derive from the study. This phase of the research
explains why the researcher selected the research problem/research topic over other probable
ones. The researcher will not only have to explain why he chose the problem but also convince
the approving committee about the need to conduct the study, how it is beneficial to the
different individuals, and how it can be of great help to the discipline or the society.

Page 2 of 26
 ISCC Research Manual

CHAPTER II

METHODOLOGY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY This section presents the type of research methodology used
in the study. (Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed
Methodology)
Quantitative Qualitative The specific Research Design for the chosen methodology
Research Design Research Design should be presented. Apart from identifying the research
methodology and specific research design, the authors shall
justify why this is the most appropriate method for the
investigation.A diagram of the steps to be followed in the
conduct of the process must be presented.
Locale, Setting and Identify where the study is going to be held and why it is
Population and Participants selected, the respondents/participants of the study, the
Sample sampling tool or strategy used to determine the number of
respondents/participants needed for the study, the sampling
procedure used to select the respondents/participants of the
study.Priori/ Inclusion and exclusion criteria should also be
presented
DATA GATHERING TOOLS

Quantitative Study: Identify the instrument used for data gathering. Describe the parts of the
Questionnaire / Survey instruments. Describe how the instrument was constructed. Describe
how the instrument was validated and tested for reliability (optional)
Qualitative Study: Identify the data-gathering instrument to be used and the interview
Interview Structure/ Guide structure (Open, structured, semi-structured). Identify what type of
interview will be conducted (KII, FGD, Phone interview). Present the
Grand-Tour question and follow-up questions to be asked.
DATA GATHERING PROCEDURES

Quantitative Study: Identify strategies and plans on how the questionnaire / survey will be
Questionnaire / Survey distributed/floated to the respondents. Identify strategies for retrieval of
forms. Present the procedures for storage and management of
quantitative data.
Qualitative Study: Present strategies and plans on when, where, and how the interview will
Interview Process be conducted. Identify strategies and techniques to assist in documenting
the interview. Present the procedures for storage and management of
qualitative data. Identify the Field notes or Analytical files to be used.
DATA MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS

Quantitative Study: Identify the appropriate method of quantification and measurement

Statistical Treatment relative to each problem. Describe how the quantified data would be
statistically treated relative to each problem
Qualitative Study: Provide a detailed discussion as to the chosen method of analysis to be
Qualitative Data Analysis used in the study, along with the steps to be followed in the particular
analysis method selected.
UNDERPINNINGS

Page 3 of 26
 ISCC Research Manual

Quantitative Study: Quantitative research studies are generally aimed to test existing
Theoretical Underpinning theories. Thus, the researchers should present an existing theory that the
proposed study aims to test.
Qualitative Study: Qualitative studies are generally more subjective and entails data
Philosophical Underpinning processing on a philosophical level. Thus, the authors should be clear
about the philosophical stance that they will use to process the
qualitative information. They should discuss their lens/ philosophical
viewpoint to be used in processing and analyzing the data.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATION
Quantitative Study Present a thorough discussion of the ethical principles to be adhered to
(and how it will be observed) throughout the whole research process.
The researchers should focus on the following:

(1) Protection of privacy and confidentiality of research information.

Qualitative Study: (2) Vulnerability of research participants
(3) Data storage
(4) Risks of Study Involvement and Participation Compensation
(5) Informed consent process and recruitment procedures
(6) Freedom to withdraw
Other Inclusions for Qualitative Studies:
Establishing The researcher shall elucidate how they will ensure the rigour/
Trustworthiness Trustworthiness of the Research results. Thus, the researcher shall
discuss the strategies they will use to establish:

(1) Credibility
(2) Transferability
(3) Dependability
(4) Confirmability
Researcher’s Background/ This section shall discuss the feelings, ideas, opinions, and past
Bracketing experiences of the researcher towards the phenomenon under study. In
this section of the study, the researcher shall attempt to acknowledge
their own biases and preconceived judgments towards the study. This is
needed to increase the rigour of the results.
REFERENCES
This section shall present all credible sources, materials, and references used to build the study. The
reference list should follow the APA 7th Edition guidelines.
Appendices
1. Sample Communication letters / study- 5. List of study sites, Population, Sample
site Approval
2. Informed Consent Form (WHO)
3. Interview Guide (Qualitative)
4. Sample Questionnaire (Quantitative)

Page 4 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

C. WORKFLOW PROCESS FOR SCHEDULING A RESEARCH PROPOSAL

FOR UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH PROPOSALS

• The undergraduate researchers shall signify their intent to do a Research Proposal
through a letter of Intent addressed to the ISCC Research Office.
• The Research Instructor shall determine if the undergraduate Research Manuscript is
ready for Research Proposal based on the Research Proposal Checklist
• The Research Instructor shall coordinate with their Department Research Focal Person.
• The Department Research Focal Person shall form the Research Panel for the Proposal
Defense based on the Roster of Qualified Faculty Researchers.
• The Department Research Focal Person and the Research Instructor shall schedule the
Proposal Defense based on the availability of the Panel members.
• The Department Research Focal Person and the Research Instructor shall attach the
Proposal Defense Evaluation Form as Front Page of the Research Manuscript.
• The undergraduate researchers shall distribute their Proposal Manuscript to the Panel
Members at least 5 days before the day of Proposal Defense.

FACULTY RESEARCH PROPOSALS

• The faculty researchers shall signify their intent to conduct a research study through a
letter of Intent addressed to the Department Head.
• The Department Head shall determine if the faculty Research Manuscript is aligned
with the Department’s research thrusts.
• Once approved, the Department Head shall endorse the Research Manuscript to the
Department Research Focal Person. The Department Research Focal Person shall then
determine if the Research Manuscript is ready for Research Proposal based on the
Research Proposal Checklist.
• The Department Research Focal Person shall forward the request letter to the ISCC
Research Office.
• The ISCC Research Coordinator and the Department Head shall form the Research
Panel for the Faculty Proposal Defense based on the Roster of Qualified Faculty
Researchers.
• The Department Research Focal Person and the Faculty Researcher shall schedule the
Faculty Proposal Defense based on the availability of the Panel members.
• The Department Research Focal Person and the Faculty Researcher shall attach the
Proposal Defense Evaluation Form as Front Page of the Research Manuscript.
• The faculty researcher shall distribute their Proposal Manuscript to the Panel Members
at least 5 days before the day of Proposal Defense.

Page 5 of 26
 ISCC Research Manual

G. GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH PROPOSAL EVALUATION

The undergraduate and faculty research proposals shall be evaluated qualitatively by the
Research Panel based on the merits of the following criteria:

Criteria Remarks/Suggestions
1. The situation analysis portrays the problem in the global, national,
regional and local context.
2. There is justification of what generated interest & motivation on the
part of the researcher to focus his study on the problem situation.
3. The literature review follows a thematic presentation in the form of
a documented extended essay consistent with the stated research
problem.
4. There is a discussion of the merits of the theories that explain,
support, and validate the problem and that provide a guide to the
intended methodology.
5. Variables, and phenomena used in the study and their relations are
identified and discussed.
6. Terms are operationally defined on the context of the research study.
7. A schematic representation of the interrelationship of variables is
presented in a paradigm.
8. A set of assumptions serving as the basis for asking specific
questions on the problem is stated .
9. The problem is generally stated, and a compelling argument of the
research’s importance is presented and discussed.
10. Specific problems stated are logically congruent to the general
problem.
11. The research hypotheses and assumptions are consistent with
specific problems,
12. A narrative of the significance of the study in terms of what it intends
to contribute, what benefits would be derived, and who are to be
benefited by the study is presented.
13. A narrative description of parameters, coverage, limitations, and
constraints in the conduct of the study is identified.
14. A narrative description of the research methodology and design
used, the rationale for its selection, and a schematic flow of the
research process are presented.
15. A narrative description of the sample and the sampling process and
a tabular and narrative presentation of the attributes of the locale or
sample population is presented
16. Data gathering tools are identified and described appropriately.
Proposed data gathering strategies are apt for the research objectives.
17. Data collection process is aptly described.
18. The data gathering procedures used in the study is described and
explicated. A schematic presentation of the research workflow
process is provided.
19. The Data Analysis / treatment of data plan is clearly presented. The
importance of using such design is explained. The process/steps of
the data analysis phase are discussed aptly.

Page 6 of 26
 ISCC Research Manual

20. Theoretical grounding/ Philosophical Underpinnings are discussed

appropriately. The congruence of said Theoretical/Philosophical
basis to the research study is aptly presented.
21. Strategies for conducting an ethical research is presented. Plans to
establish Research rigor and trustworthiness is explained.
22. List of References conform to the set guidelines. Intext citations are
reflected in the Reference List, vice-versa.

Do you approve the research proposal?___________________________

What additional requirements are needed for the approval of the research proposal?

___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________

Research Title Proposal Evaluator

Signature over Printed Name:

Page 7 of 26
 ISCC Research Manual

E. GUIDELINES FOR WRITING RESEARCH REPORT /MANUSCRIPT

PARTS OF THE NECESSARY CONTENT OUTPUT

RESEARCH
PAPER
ABSTRACT Overview. An abstract is a short summary of your completed research. It is
intended to describe your work without going into great detail. Abstracts should
be self-contained and concise, explaining your work as briefly and clearly as
possible.
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND Identify the problem situation and Situation analysis that portrays the
OF THE STUDY describe its pervasiveness in terms of the problem in the global, national,
global, national, regional, and local regional and local context.
situation. Justification of what generated
interest & motivation on the part of
the researcher to focus his study on
the problem situation.
Operational Identify key terms used in the study and The Operational definition of terms
Definition of Terms define these operationally, i.e., the is integrated into the textual
meaning of the terms as used in the study discourse in APA format.
Theoretical Cite and discuss the theories that: discussion of the merits of the
Framework (a) account for the problem under study, theories that explain, support, and
(b) support the major contention of the validate the problem and that
study, and provide a guide to the intended
(c) support the methodology of the study. methodology

From the above, explicate certain aspects Identification and discussion of the
of the theory which becomes the basis for variables used in the study and their
the study or which the study intends to relations.
pursue or prove. Identify the variables
involved and operationalize measures.
A schematic representation of the
Present the above concept in the form of a interrelationship of variables
paradigm or model which becomes the (Conceptual Paradigm)
road map in navigating through the
different aspects of the research process.

Review of Related Review all possible literature written Thematic narrative in the form of a
Literature about the topic, (Library Research documented extended essay on the
Approach). Review all possible literature research problem.
on the problem or related to the problem.

Review similar studies that use the same Narrative of available evidence that
or different method to investigate the highlights results of similar studies.
research subject.
The Problem State in general what the study intends to General statement of the problem
describe, find out, discover, explain, or and a compelling argument why the
evaluate research is needed
STATEMENT OF State the specific logical components of Statement of general and specific
THE PROBLEM the general problem research problems
Present a broad statement of purpose
which uses well-defined and measurable

Page 8 of 26
 ISCC Research Manual

concepts, and questions that are particular

to the topic under study.
Hypotheses and Formulate a tentative answer to each Stated research hypotheses and
assumptions specific problem to serve as your research assumptions will serve as the basis
hypothesis. for asking specific questions on the
State the assumptions that serve as the problem
basis for critical interrogation

Scope and Identify the parameters of the study in A narrative description of

Delimitation terms of respondents, location, place, parameters, coverage, limitations,
time, themes, variables, and subject and constraints in the conduct of
matter. the study.
Identify the constraints and limitations in
conducting this kind of study .
Significance of the Identify the possible contributions of the A narrative of the significance of
Study findings of the study to the existing pool the study in terms of what it intends
of knowledge to contribute, what benefits would
Identify the benefits that the findings be derived, and who are to be
would generate and identify the benefited by the study.
corresponding beneficiaries of the study.

CHAPTER II
METHODOLOGY
Research Describe the design used in the study. Narrative description of the
Methodology and Justify why this design is most research method and research
Design appropriate for the study design. Schematic presentation of
how the employed Research design
is conducted
Locale, Population Describe where the study shall take place, Narrative description of the sample
and Sample the population and sample, and the and the sampling process and a
(Quantitative) sampling design used to select research tabular and narrative presentation
Setting and subjects. Come up with a profile of of the attributes of the universe or
Participants respondents according to the attributes sample population
relevant to the study.
(Qualitative
Data Gathering Identify and describe the instrument used Identification and description of
Tools to gather data in terms of its origin, how it data gathering tools
was generated, and how it was validated
Data Gathering Describe the step-by-step actions done in Narrative description of the data
Procedures gathering the data gathering procedures used in the
study
Treatment of Data Describe the data processing protocols Narrative description of the
employed. Identify and describe the statistical and thematic tools used
statistical and Thematic tools used in the for the treatment of data
study.
Theoretical or Present a theory that is tested by the Narrative description of a theory or
Philosophical quantitative study, or a philosophical philosophical stance adopted by the
Underpinnings stance assumed to process the qualitative researcher.
data.
Ethical Strategies and plan of action to ensure Narrative presentation of the
Considerations that the research study adheres to ethical strategies and actions made to keep
standards, including: adhere to Research ethical
(1) Protection of privacy and standards.
confidentiality of research information.

Page 9 of 26
 ISCC Research Manual

(2) Vulnerability of research participants

(3) Data storage
(4) Risks of Study Involvement and
Participation Compensation
(5) Informed consent process and
recruitment procedures
(6) Freedom to withdraw
Establishing Strategies and plan of action to ensure Narrative discussion of the
Trustworthiness rigour or trustworthiness of the strategies and actions made to
(qualitative studies) qualitative results, especially on ensure the rigour and
establishing: trustworthiness of the qualitative
(1) Credibility research
(2) Transferability
(3) Dependability
(4) Confirmability
Bracketing or Presentation of the biases, feelings, ideas, Narrative discussion of the
Researcher’s opinions, and past experiences of the researcher’s biases, feelings, ideas,
Background researcher towards the phenomenon opinions, and past experiences of
(Qualitative under study. the researcher towards the
studies) phenomenon under study.
CHAPTER III
RESULTS
Presentation Summarize results and describe in Tabular and narrative presentation
narrative, tabular, or graphical form. and discussion of the results.
Discuss data collation, tabulation,
computation, and organization
(Quantitative Studies) Schematic presentation and
discussion of the emergent themes,
Provide a graphic presentation of the subthemes, and codes.
different themes and subthemes derived
from the data analysis using either
Thematic Map, Conceptual Map, or
Eidetic symbolism.
Analysis and Present a summary of the trends and Tabular, graphical, narrative
Literature scoping patterns observed in the study, and description of analyzed data
present the computed indexes used in
determining relationships among
variables used in the QUANTITATIVE
study. Schematic presentation and
discussion of the emergent themes,
Detailed explanation of how one arrived subthemes, and codes.
at the concept/thematic map, categories,
themes, subthemes, and verbatims that
support the analysis (Qualitative study)

Interpretation Draw out inferences , meanings, and Documented narrative of the

implications from analyzed data. interpretation of the study
Corroborate analysis through internal and
external cross- referencing (Quantitative
Study)
Detailed discussion of the
implications of the study results

Page 10 of 26
 ISCC Research Manual

Detailed explanation of the meaning of

the study results and its implication to the
discipline or industry (Qualitative Study).

CHAPTER IV: DISCUSSIONS

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary, Summarize the whole study, Generalize Summary of findings, conclusions
Conclusions, from results, recommend action steps. derived from the findings, and
Recommendations recommendations derived from
conclusions.
Reflexivity (for Discuss the learning insights, experiences A narrative discussion of how the
Qualitative and change in view-points of the researcher’s perspective has
Research) researchers after completion of the changed (in the context of their
research study biases based on the Researcher’s
Background)
Other Inclusions
References Provide a list of credible sources, materials, and references used to build the
study. The reference list should follow the APA 7th Edition guidelines.
Appendices 1. sample communication letters/study-site Approval
2. Informed Consent
3. Interview Guide
4. List of study sites
5. List of Interview Participants/ Key Informants
6. Sample Transcript File
7. Sample Open Coding/ Data Reduction
8. Sample Categorization/ Generation of Themes
9. Sample Memo
10. Curriculum Vitae

Page 11 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

F. WORKFLOW PROCESS FOR SCHEDULING A RESEARCH DEFENSE

FOR UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH THESIS

• The undergraduate researchers shall signify their intent to do a THESIS DEFENSE

through a letter of Intent addressed to the ISCC Research Office.
• The Research Instructor shall determine if the undergraduate Research Thesis
Manuscript is ready for THESIS DEFENSE based on the THESIS DEFENSE
Checklist. (See Appendix)
• The Research Instructor shall coordinate with their Department Research Focal Person.
• The Department Research Focal Person shall form the Research Panel for the THESIS
Defense based on the Roster of Qualified Faculty Researchers.
• The Department Research Focal Person and the Research Instructor shall schedule the
THESIS Defense based on the availability of the Panel members.
• The Department Research Focal Person and the Research Instructor shall attach the
THESIS Defense Evaluation Form as Front Page of the Research Manuscript.
• The undergraduate researchers shall distribute their Proposal Manuscript to the Panel
Members at least 5 days before the day of Thesis Defense.

FACULTY RESEARCH PROPOSALS

• The faculty researchers shall signify their intent to conduct a RESEARCH DEFENSE
through a letter of Intent addressed to the ISCC Research Office through the
Department Focal Person.
• The Department Research Focal Person shall then determine if the Research Manuscript
is ready for Research Proposal based on the Research DEFENSE Checklist. (See
Appendix)
• The Department Research Focal Person shall forward the request letter and Final
Manuscript to the ISCC Research Office.
• The ISCC Research Coordinator and the Department Head shall form the Research
Panel for the Faculty RESEARCH Defense based on the Roster of Qualified Faculty
Researchers.
• The Department Research Focal Person and the Faculty Researcher shall schedule the
Faculty RESEARCH Defense based on the availability of the Panel members.
• The Department Research Focal Person and the Faculty Researcher shall attach the
Proposal Defense Evaluation Form as Front Page of the Research Manuscript.
• The faculty researcher shall distribute their Research Manuscript to the Panel Members
at least 5 days before the day of Research Defense.

Page 12 of 26
 ISCC Research Manual

G. GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH REPORT EVALUATION

The undergraduate and faculty research defense shall be evaluated qualitatively by the
Research Panel based on the merits of the following criteria:

Criteria Remarks/Suggestions
1. The situation analysis portrays the problem in the global, national,
regional and local context.
2. There is justification of what generated interest & motivation on the
part of the researcher to focus his study on the problem situation.
3. The literature review follows a thematic presentation in the form of
a documented extended essay consistent with the stated research
problem.
4. There is a discussion of the merits of the theories that explain,
support, and validate the problem and that provide a guide to the
intended methodology.
5. Variables, and phenomena used in the study and their relations are
identified and discussed.
6. Terms are operationally defined on the context of the research study.
7. A schematic representation of the interrelationship of variables is
presented in a paradigm.
8. A set of assumptions serving as the basis for asking specific
questions on the problem is stated .
9. The problem is generally stated, and a compelling argument of the
research’s importance is presented and discussed.
10. Specific problems stated are logically congruent to the general
problem.
11. The research hypotheses and assumptions are consistent with
specific problems,
12. A narrative of the significance of the study in terms of what it intends
to contribute, what benefits would be derived, and who are to be
benefited by the study is presented.
13. A narrative description of parameters, coverage, limitations, and
constraints in the conduct of the study is identified.
14. A narrative description of the research methodology and design
used, the rationale for its selection, and a schematic flow of the
research process are presented.
15. A narrative description of the sample and the sampling process and
a tabular and narrative presentation of the attributes of the locale or
sample population is presented
16. Data gathering tools are identified and described appropriately.
Proposed data gathering strategies are apt for the research objectives.
17. Data collection process is aptly described.
18. The data gathering procedures used in the study is described and
explicated. A schematic presentation of the research workflow
process is provided.
19. The Data Analysis / treatment of data plan is clearly presented. The
importance of using such design is explained. The process/steps of
the data analysis phase are discussed aptly.

Page 13 of 26
 ISCC Research Manual

20. Theoretical grounding/ Philosophical Underpinnings are discussed

appropriately. The congruence of said Theoretical/Philosophical
basis to the research study is aptly presented.
21. Strategies for conducting an ethical research is presented. Plans to
establish Research rigor and trustworthiness is explained.
22. Research results are summarized and presented and explicated
accurately.
23. Trends and patterns observed in the study are explicated.
Relationship of variables and Themes and Subthemes are discussed
appropriately.
24. Literature scoping is adequately done. Results of past research
studies that are congruent with the findings are presented.
25. Inferences , meanings, and implications from analyzed data are
corroborated by sound data analysis and interpretation.
26. Detailed explanation of the meaning of the study results and its
implication to the discipline or industry are presented and discussed
appropriately
27. Summary of results are presented accurately and in an organized
fashion.
28. Conclusions are logically rooted in the summary of results, and are
explicated appropriately.
29. Recommendations are congruent with the conclusions made.
30. A narrative discussion of how the researcher’s perspective has
changed in the context of their personal biases towards the study is
explained. (Qualitative Study)
31. List of References conform to the set guidelines. Intext citations are
reflected in the Reference List, vice-versa.
32. Appendices of the Research Report are complete and organized
according to set guidelines.
33. Abstract of the study aptly highlights salient points and features of
the research study, and is written succinctly and concisely.
Do you approve the research output?___________________________
What additional requirements are needed for the approval of the research output?

___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________

Research Title Proposal Evaluator

Signature over Printed Name:

Page 14 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

COMPOSITION OF THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH PANEL MEMBERS

AND THEIR ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

The Undergraduate research defense will be validated and verified by a Research Panel
comprised of the following members:

Chairman. The Chair is the Department Head of the program where the thesis originates.
Before the Research Proposal/Defense, the Chair is expected to:
• Inform the department research focal person, in advance, if they have any issues or
concerns and resolve any queries regarding the proposal/research output before the event
date;
• Work with the department research focal person and research instructor to set the agenda
and organise the panel, where necessary;
• Read the manuscript and prepare discussion points/questions for the private panel meetings
and deliberation.

During the Research Proposal / Research Defense, the Chair should:

• Chair meetings of the Panel.
• Ensure that members of the Panel, staff and students can contribute to the discussion and
further explore the Research Proposal / Research Manuscript during review, validation, and
verification events.
• Within the initial meeting, provide a brief overview of the school’s process of research
proposal / research defense, and ensure that the External Panel Members understand the
process.
• Set the Agenda for the private Panel Meeting (deliberation after the proposal/defense
presentation)
• Ensure that there is sufficient evidence that the indicators listed in the Research Report
Evaluation Form checklist have been addressed properly.
• Elicit and evaluate Panel Members Conclusion.
• In conjunction with the other Panel Members, compose and present a summary of the
panel’s commendations, conditions, and recommendations, and ensure that they are clear
and achievable.
• Check that all the Panel Members agree with the decision.

After the Research Proposal / Research Defense, the Chair should:

• Approve the Research Proposal/Defense Report prepared by the Research Secretary
directly following the event.
• Approve the Final Research Proposal / Research Manuscript and ensures that all conditions
set by the Panel have been satisfactorily met.

Research Secretary. The Secretary shall be the Department Research Focal Person of the
program where the thesis originates. The Research Secretary is expected to perform the
following functions during the Research Proposal/Defense.
Before the Research Proposal/Defense, the Research Secretary is expected to:
• Work with the Research Instructor to form the Research Panel in accordance with the
Roster of Qualified Faculty Researchers
• Assist the Research Instructor to communicate with the External Panel Member.

Page 15 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

• Supply the undergraduate researchers and Research Instructors of the different forms,
documents, and templates needed prior to the Proposal/ Defense.

During the Research Proposal / Research Defense, the Research Secretary should:
• Work with the Research Instructors and undergraduate researchers to ensure that all
documents and forms for the Proposal/Defense are available.
• Keep a formal record of the proposal/defense and its outcomes using a standard reporting
template.
• Ensure that the event runs smoothly and on time.
• Contribute to the discussion, where applicable.

After the Research Proposal / Research Defense, the Research Secretary should:
• Prepare the Research Proposal/Defense Report about the comments, conditions, and
recommendations of the Panel immediately following the event.
• Prepare a summary of the feedbacks, comments, suggestions, and conditions made by the
Research Panel Members, and circulate said report to the Research Instructor and
undergraduate researchers.
• Circulate the Research Proposal / Defense Report to the Panel Members, and the ISCC-
Research Office.
• If revisions are needed, the Research Secretary will communicate with the Research
Instructor and undergraduate researchers to set deadlines for re-submission of the
proposal/manuscript.
• Liase with the ISCC- Research Office to ensure that the progress of the Proposal/Defense
is reported.

Internal Panel Member. One internal panel member will be appointed in accordance with the
Roster of Qualified Faculty Researchers. Internal panel members cannot be from the
Department of the Proposal/Defense being considered at validation/review, but must be a
member of staff at Ilocos Sur Community College.
Before the Research Proposal/Defense, the Internal Panel member is expected to:
• Read the documentation and prepare discussion points/questions for the private panel
meetings and, in the event of a Proposal/Defense, meeting with students.
• Review the Proposal/Research Manuscript, focusing on the technical aspect of the research
process, and form a judgement on the soundness and trustworthiness of the research
procedure.

During the Research Proposal/Defense, the Internal Panel member is expected to:
• Examine the information available to students in support of their studies and form a
judgment on whether the information is accurate, complete, and effective.
• Discuss with the Panel Members and Students about the suggestions, recommendations
made to improve the Research Proposal/ Manuscript.
• Review the arrangement and completeness of the necessary parts of the Research Proposal
/ Manuscript, and ensure that they are effective and operate in accordance with the ISCC-
Research Office procedures.
• Discuss with the Panel Members to highlight issues and concerns that need to be dealt with
prior to the acceptance/rejection of the Research Proposal / Manuscript.
• Help identify any areas of good practice.

Page 16 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

After the Research Proposal/Defense, the Internal Panel member is expected to:
• Check and review the Research Proposal/Defense Report about the comments, conditions,
and recommendations of the Panel.
• Check the Research Panel Member’s response to the comments, conditions, and
recommendations to see if further revisions are necessary, or whether they are considered
as met.

External Panel Member. One internal panel member will be appointed by the Chairman from
a list of nominees forwarded by the Research Instructor and the Department Research Focal
Person. External panel members cannot be from the Department of the Proposal/Defense being
considered at validation/review, and must not be a member of staff at Ilocos Sur Community
College. The External Panel Member must be an industry practitioner whose expertise is
relevant to the research topic for review/validation/verification.
Before the Research Proposal/Defense, the External Panel member is expected to:
• Read the documentation and prepare discussion points/questions for the private panel
meetings and, in the event of a Proposal/Defense, meeting with the Research Instructor to
clarify and discuss salient points to improve the undergraduate research paper.
• Review the Proposal/Research Manuscript, focusing on the industry aspect of the research,
and form a judgement on the soundness and trustworthiness of the research procedure.
• Review the research strategy to ensure that the focus of the research are appropriately
assessed as to relevance and content
• Determine the currency, viability, and timeliness of the research proposal/manuscript in
light with current trends within the subject are and industry.
• Suggest for improvements or examples of good practice which could be adopted by the
undergraduate researchers.
• Submit their findings to either the Research Secretary or Research Instructor

During the Research Proposal/Defense, the External Panel member is expected to:
• Provide independent subject expertise and professional experience.
• Examine the information available to students in support of their studies and form a
judgment on whether the information is accurate, complete, and effective.
• Discuss with the Panel Members and Students about the suggestions, recommendations
made to improve the Research Proposal/ Manuscript based on industry practices.
• Discuss with the Panel Members to highlight issues and concerns that need to be dealt with
prior to the acceptance/rejection of the Research Proposal / Manuscript.
• Help identify any areas of good practice.

After the Research Proposal/Defense, the External Panel member is expected to:
• Check and review the Research Proposal/Defense Report about the comments, conditions,
and recommendations of the Panel.
• Check the Research Panel Member’s response to the comments, conditions, and
recommendations to see if further revisions are necessary, or whether they are considered
as met.

Research Statistician. The Research Statistician will come from the ISCC-Research Office.
Before the Research Proposal/Defense, the Research Statistician is expected to:
• Read the documentation and prepare discussion points/questions for the private panel
meetings and, in the event of a Proposal/Defense, meeting with the Research Instructor to

Page 17 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

clarify and discuss the soundness or appropriateness of the statistical tools to be used in the
study.
• Suggest statistical methods, tools, and strategies improve the trustworthiness of the data
gathered by undergraduate researchers.
• Check the validity, reliability, correctness of the statistical computation, and provide
suggestions to improve, rectify, or enhance data interpretation.
Before the Research Proposal/Defense, the Research Statistician is expected to:
• Provide technical assistance in computing, checking, and validating statistical results.
• Add value to the discussion, where necessary
• Ensure that statistical data are interpreted and analyzed accordingly.
After the Research Proposal/Defense, the Research Statistician is expected to:
• Check and review the Research Proposal/Defense Report about the comments, conditions,
and recommendations of the Panel.
• Check the Research Panel Member’s response to the comments, conditions, and
recommendations to see if further revisions are necessary, or whether they are considered
as met.

Research Adviser. The Research Adviser is a faculty member of the program where the thesis
originates. The Research Adviser is nominated by the Research Instructor based on the Roster
of Qualified Faculty Researchers.
Before the Research Proposal/Defense, the Research Adviser is expected to:
• Assist the students in writing the Research Proposal/Research Manuscript.
• Ensure that the Proposal/Research Manuscript follows the school’s standards and format.
• Check the Spelling, grammar, syntax of the Research Proposal / Manuscript
• Ensure that Critical Apparatus (Referencing, bibliography, appendices, in-text citations,
formatting) are properly used.
• Assist student researchers to organize the Research Proposal/Manuscript, and ensure that
the contents are coherent and consistent, clear of expression and propriety of emphases
• Ensure that the Research Proposal / Manuscript has unity of structure (from the background
to the objectives and purpose statement) and follows a logical presentation or sequence
• Complete forms and documents necessary for proposal
During the Research Proposal/Defense, the Research Adviser is expected to:
• Facilitate the presentation of the undergraduate researchers
• Provide value-adding suggestions, comments, and recommendations, if necessary
• Jot down salient points raised by the Panel, and clarify suggestions and comments.
• Ensure that the presentation runs smoothly
After the Research Proposal/Defense, the Research Adviser is expected to:
• Check and review the Research Proposal/Defense Report about the comments, conditions,
and recommendations of the Panel and ensure that the students understand them.
• Check the Research Panel Member’s response to the comments, conditions, and
recommendations to see if further revisions are necessary, or whether they are considered
as met.

Research Critic. The Research Critic is a faculty member of the program where the thesis
originates. The Research Critic is nominated by the Research Instructor based on the Roster of
Qualified Faculty Researchers. The Critic shall assist the Research Adviser in checking the
Research Proposal / Manuscript, and shall provide value-adding suggestions to improve the
paper.

Page 18 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

H. QUALIFICATIONS AND QUALITIES OF A THESIS ADVISER

The following qualities are recommended of a thesis/research adviser:

1. Apt Academic Preparation and Research Experience. The Research Adviser should be
at least a master’s degree holder, has attended at least three (3) Seminars / Training on
Research, and has completed at least one (1) research study.

2. Knowledge and mastery of the research concepts. A thesis adviser should have a
research-based orientation. One must have mastery of the technical aspects of research and
have apt exposure and experience to various research processes. The Research Adviser
should be capable of integration of the technical details of the nature and process of
research. A good insight and grasp of the various research documents is must.

3. Creative and logical thinking. A thesis adviser should be able to stimulate creativity and
allow the advisee’s imagination to soar and spread until it can capture the definite specific
documents necessary in the conduct of a research. He should give enough time to the
advisee to explore all possibilities and alternations in research investigation within the time
frame and moral-ethical perimeter. Thinking is best stimulated with an encouraging adviser
rather than one who cripples ideas. In his dialogue with the advisee, the adviser should ask
questions that will stir the mind and curiosity rather than impose his own way and give
straight way materials or ideas.

4. Analytical Mind and Confidence. Research is made up of a systematic and logical

process. In the process of thesis writing, the adviser can perceive elements, environment,
and personnel to be involved in the conduct of the research. He can anticipate situation that
can pursue or defer the research activity. He can visualize the relationships of the variables
in the process of data manipulation. Hence, analytical thinking must be coupled with
capability of decision-making . his decision should be objective and should facilitate
completion of research based on truth.

5. MATURITY. The thesis adviser should be mature in his relationship with the adviser and
in the conduct of research. He should exemplify better control of the situation and handle
the study to attain truth rather than personal aggrandizement or monetary gain.

6. PROFESSIONALISM. In the attempt to assist the advisee to complete the study, the
adviser should be professional in his dealings. He could seek assistance or help from his
colleagues without fear of being threatened professionally.

7. Wholesome human relationship and well-adjusted personality. The adviser should be

one who is patient enough to unravel the complexities of the study and entangle the many
fears of the advisee to settle with the problem. An adviser is one who is free from personal
feelings, biases, and prejudices to be able to guide the advisee to work objectively. The
adviser should be supportive and at the same time trustful in his dealings.

Page 19 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

APPENDIX A
SAMPLE TITLE PAGE FOR THESIS PROPOSAL

MIDWIFERY ROLES AND PRACTICES OF RURAL HEALTH MIDWIVES OF

ILOCOS SUR: A MIXED METHODS PERSPECTIVE

_____________________
A Thesis Proposal
Presented to the faculty
Of the Ilocos Sur Community College
[Insert Department Name Here]

____________________
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Degree
[Insert Course Here]

__________________
Submitted by:
Dela Cruz, Juan T.
February 2022

Page 20 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

APPENDIX B
SAMPLE TITLE PAGE FOR THESIS

MIDWIFERY ROLES AND PRACTICES OF RURAL HEALTH MIDWIVES OF

ILOCOS SUR: A MIXED METHODS PERSPECTIVE

_____________________

A Thesis Proposal

Presented to the faculty

Of the Ilocos Sur Community College

[Insert Department Name Here]

____________________

In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Degree

[Insert Course Here]

__________________

Submitted by:

Dela Cruz, Juan T.

February 2022

Page 21 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

APPENDIX C
SAMPLE ACCEPTANCE SHEET FOR THESIS PROPOSAL

ACCEPTANCE SHEET

In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF SCIENCE

IN MIDWIFERY, this thesis proposal entitled, MIDWIFERY ROLES AND PRACTICES
OF RURAL HEALTH MIDWIVES OF ILOCOS SUR: A MIXED METHODS
PERSPECTIVE, has been prepared and submitted by Dela Cruz, Juan T. and is
hereby endorsed for approval.

____________________________
JEFF LEIGH T. REBURON, PhD,RM,RN
Adviser

This is to certify that the thesis proposal submitted by Dela Cruz, Juan T. has been
approved and accepted by the Thesis Committee on June 25,2022.

__________________________
BHERT KEANE Q. PUGRAD, MAN, RM, RN
Chairman

________________________ _______________________
PAUL MARK P. PILAR, MAN,RM,RN JAMES R. TAIZA, MAN, RM,RN
Member Member

Noted: ____________________________
LIMUEL V. DOLORICO, MAN, RM, RN
Head, ISCC Health Science Department

Page 22 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

APPENDIX D
SAMPLE EDORSEMENT SHEET FOR THESIS DEFENSE

INDORSEMENT

This thesis entitled, MIDWIFERY ROLES AND PRACTICES OF RURAL

HEALTH MIDWIVES OF ILOCOS SUR: A MIXED METHODS PERSPECTIVE,
prepared and submitted by DELA CRUZ, JUAN T., in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MIDWIFERY, has been
examined and is recommended for acceptance and approval for Oral Examination.

This is to certify further that DELA CRUZ, JUAN T. is ready for Oral Examination.

____________________________
JEFF LEIGH T. REBURON, PhD,RM,RN
Adviser

This is to certify that the thesis entitled, MIDWIFERY ROLES AND

PRACTICES OF RURAL HEALTH MIDWIVES OF ILOCOS SUR: A MIXED
METHODS PERSPECTIVE, prepared and submitted by DELA CRUZ, JUAN T., is
recommended for Oral Examination

__________________________
BHERT KEANE Q. PUGRAD, MAN, RM, RN
Chairman

________________________ _______________________
PAUL MARK P. PILAR, MAN,RM,RN JAMES R. TAIZA, MAN, RM,RN
Member Member

Noted: ____________________________
LIMUEL V. DOLORICO, MAN, RM, RN
Head, ISCC Health Science Department

Page 23 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

APPENDIX E
SAMPLE APPROVAL SHEET FOR DEFENSED THESIS

APPROVAL SHEET

Approved by the Committee on Oral Examination with a grade of 92.5% on March

25, 2022.

__________________________

BHERT KEANE Q. PUGRAD, MAN, RM, RN

Chairman

________________________ _______________________
PAUL MARK P. PILAR, MAN,RM,RN JAMES R. TAIZA, MAN, RM,RN
Member Member

Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MIDWIFERY.

____________________________
LIMUEL V. DOLORICO, MAN, RM, RN
Head, ISCC Health Science Department

Page 24 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

APPENDIX F
SAMPLE REQUEST LETTER FOR ORAL DEFENSE

Republic of the Philippines

Provincial Government of Ilocos Sur
ILOCO SUR COMMUNITY COLLEGE
July 13, 2021

Dr. Arnel Castro Doctolero

College Administrator
Ilocos Sur Community College

Dear Sir:

We, the undersigned Bachelor of Science in Midwifery candidates of Ilocos Sur Community
College- Health Science Department, conducted a research entitled “FACTORS AFFECTING THE
ACCEPTABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL FAMILY PLANNING METHOD AMONG MEN OF
REPRODUCTIVE AGE IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF SAN ILDEFONSO, ILOCOS SUR” as a
terminal requirement for R.S. Midwifery subject. Our research undertaking aimed to determine and
ascertain the acceptability of artificial contraception along with factors that may affect such
acceptability.

In this regard, may we respectfully ask your good office to allow us to present our research
output on July 19, 2020, 1:00 pm, at the ISCC Midwifery Laboratory. May we also request your good
office to allow the following faculty members to serve as our research panel members.
Chairman: Mr. Limuel V. Dolorico
Panel 1: Mrs. Marie Cecille Liberty S. Varilla
Panel 2: Mr. Paul Mark P. Pilar
Critic: Mr. Bhert Keane Q. Pugrad
Statistician: Mrs. Joireyna R. Rafanan
Adviser: Mr. James R. Taiza
Secretary: Dr. Jeff Leigh T. Reburon

We promise to observe minimum health standards and to practice social distancing during our
face-to-face defense. We fervently hope for your positive response regarding this matter. Thank you
very much and more power!

Respectfully Yours,

Jovelyn T. Rin
Leslie T. Puzon
Lotlot G. Hortizuela
ISCC BSM4 Student Researchers

Recommending Approval:

Mr. Limuel V. Dolorico

Midwifery Principal

Approved:

Arnel Castro Doctolero

College Administrator

Page 25 of 26
ISCC Research Manual

APPENDIX F
SAMPLE RUBRICS FOR GRADING ORAL DEFENSE

Republic of the Philippines

Provincial Government of Ilocos Sur
Ilocos Sur Community College

General Criterion for Research Output Presentation

Name of Students: Date of Presentation:

Research Adviser:

Instructions to the Panel:

Using the grading scale given below, fill in the grade for all the areas listed. Multiply each
area by the given constants. The sum total of the three weighted area grades is the given grade to the
group. No rounding-off to the nearest integer shall be done at this stage.

The text of the Research Output as written (70%)

1. The Mechanics of the text (30%)
a. General Appearance, including the typing
b. Spelling, grammar, syntax
c. Critical Apparatus (Referencing, bibliography, appendices, in-text citations, formatting)
Area Grade:_______ X 0.3 = ___________

2. Organization of the Research Output (40%)

a. Coherence and consistency (unity of ideas)
b. Clarity of expression and propriety of emphases
c. Unity of structure (from the background to the objectives and purpose statement)
d. Logic of Presentation
Area Grade:_______ X 0.4 = ___________

Oral Presentation of the Research Results (30%)

1. Mastery of the Research Process and Results (20%)
a. Clarity of points presented
b. Quality of justification or argumentation
c. Use of quality evidence Area Grade:_______ X 0.2 = ___________

2. Researcher Professionalism (10%)

a. Appearance/ Posture
b. Decorum Area Grade:_______ X 0.1 = ___________

Grand Total = ___________

__________________________
Research Panel Member

Jeff Leigh Taay Reburon, RM, RN, Ph.D.

Research Instructor

Page 26 of 26