The Whole Enochian Dictionary
The Whole Enochian Dictionary
The Whole Enochian Dictionary
Introduction
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
The Grand Experiment in the Enochian language is begun. Using etymological and qabalistic techniques to solve
some of the mysteries of this language has proven to be highly rewarding. Starting off this Enochian Dictionary,
we’ve downloaded a host of information from Wikipedia in order to educate and prepare the reader for the
creative process that is to follow. Large examples of the techniques used to create this word can be found in the
AOM’s translations of Liber Loagaeth and further detailed in Liber Ged; of AOM origin.
We’ve also included Aaron Lietch’s excellent essa y on the Enochian language and Patricia Shaffer’s Letter
Essences in order to create a more complete compendium for the serious student of this language.
The Holy Table of Practice has been translated previously by published authors whose works are infamously
riddled with errors. There is no worse example of this than the translations of the Holy Table and Table of 12.
Here the Schuelers literally make up definitions for words without any rationale at all; as if they’re inventing their
own game. This is really no worse than the creative yet, ridiculous efforts of the Golden Dawn to “truncate” the
squares of the Elemental Tablets. And these irrational efforts only confound the effectiveness of this Magick.
The translations here have been carefully produced by strict etymological and qabalistic practices outlined
in the AOM’s Liber Ged and as well, the production in Liber Loagaeth. And unlike the Schuelers, great
care has been taken to explain how these translations have been produced, that the thorough student can
claim confidence in his or her findings in this work.
Enochian Grammar
Linguistics is the scientific study of language, which can be theoretical or applied. Someone who engages in this
study is called a linguist.
Theoretical (or general) linguistics encompasses a number of sub-fields, such as the study of language structure
(grammar) and meaning (semantics). The study of grammar encompasses morphology (formation and alteration
of words) and syntax (the rules that determine the way words combine into phrases and sentences). Also a part of
this field are phonology, the study of sound systems and abstract sound units, and phonetics, which is concerned
with the actual properties of speech sounds (phones), non-speech sounds, and how they are produced and
perceived.
Linguistics compares languages (comparative linguistics) and explores their histories, in order to find universal
properties of language and to account for its development and origins (historical linguistics).
Theoretical linguistics is the branch of linguistics that is most concerned with developing models of linguistic
knowledge. Part of this endeavor involves the search for and explanation of linguistic universals, that is,
properties all languages have in common. The fields that are generally considered the core of theoretical
linguistics are syntax, phonology, morphology, and semantics. Although phonetics often informs phonology, it is
often excluded from the purview of theoretical linguistics, along with psycholinguistics and sociolinguistics.
A linguistic universal is a statement that is true for all natural languages. For example, All languages have nouns
and verbs, or All spoken languages have consonants and vowels. Research in this area of linguistics is closely tied
to linguistic typology, and intends to reveal information about how the human brain processes language. The field
was largely pioneered by the linguist Joseph Greenberg, who from a set of some thirty languages derived a set of
basic universals, mostly dealing with syntax.
Linguistic typology is a subfield of linguistics that studies and classifies languages according to their structural
features. Its aim is to describe and explain the structural diversity of the world's languages. It includes three
subdisciplines: Qualitative typology deals with the issue of comparing languages and within-language variance,
Quantitative typology deals with the distribution of structural patterns in the world’ s languages, and Theoretical
typology explains these distributions.
In linguistics, syntax (from Ancient Greek συν- syn-, “together”, and τάξις táxis, “arrangement”) is the study of
the rules that govern the structure of sentences, and which determine their relative grammaticality. The term
syntax can also be used to refer to these rules themselves, as in “the syntax of a language”. Modern research in
syntax attempts to describe languages in terms of such rules, and, for many practitioners, to find general rules that
apply to all languages. Since the field of syntax attempts to explain grammaticality judgments, and not provide
them, it is unconcerned with linguistic prescription.
Though all theories of syntax take human language as their object of study, there are some significant differences
in outlook. Chomskian linguists see syntax as a branch of psychology, since they conceive syntax as the study of
linguistic knowledge. Others (e.g. Gerald Gazdar) take a more Platonistic view, regarding syntax as the study of
an abstract formal system.
An important part of phonology is studying which sounds are distinctive units within a language. In English, for
example, /p/ and /b/ are distinctive units of sound, (i.e., they are phonemes / the difference is phonemic, or
phonematic). This can be seen from minimal pairs such as "pin" and "bin", which mean different things, but differ
only in one sound. On the other hand, /p/ is often pronounced differently depending on its position relative to
other sounds, yet these different pronunciations are still considered by native speakers to be the same "sound". For
example, the /p/ in "pin" is aspirated while the same phoneme in "spin" is not. In some other languages, for
example Thai and Quechua, this same difference of aspiration or non-aspiration does differentiate phonemes.
In addition to the minimal meaningful sounds (the phonemes), phonology studies how sounds alternate, such as
the /p/ in English described above, and topics such as syllable structure, stress, accent, and intonation.
The principles of phonological theory have also been applied to the analysis of sign languages, even though the
phonological units are not acoustic. The principles of phonology, and for that matter, language, are independent of
modality because they stem from an abstract and innate grammar.
Morphology is the field within linguistics that studies the internal structure of words. (Words as units in the
lexicon are the subject matter of lexicology.) While words are generally accepted as being (with clitics) the
smallest units of syntax, it is clear that in most (if not all) languages, words can be related to other words by rules.
For example, English speakers recognize that the words dog , dogs, and dog-catcher are closely related. English
speakers recognize these relations from their tacit knowledge of the rules of word-formation in English. They
intuit that dog is to dogs as cat is to cats; similarly, dog is to dog-catcher as dish is to dishwasher . The rules
understood by the speaker reflect specific patterns (or regularities) in the way words are formed from smaller
units and how those smaller units interact in speech. In this way, morphology is the branch of linguistics that
studies patterns of word-formation within and across languages, and attempts to formulate rules that model the
knowledge of the speakers of those languages.
Semantics (Greek sēmantikos, giving signs, significant, symptomatic, from sēma (σῆμα), sign) refers to the
aspects of meaning that are expressed in a language, code, or other form of representation of information.
Semantics is contrasted with two other aspects of meaningful expression, namely, syntax, the construction of
complex signs from simpler signs, and pragmatics, the practical use of signs by agents or communities of
interpretation in particular circumstances and contexts. By the usual convention that calls a study or a theory by
the name of its subject matter, semantics may also denote the theoretical study of meaning in systems of signs.
Though terminology varies, writers on the subject of meaning generally recognize two sorts of meaning that a
significant expression may have: (1) the relation that a sign has to objects and objective situations, actual or
possible, and (2) the relation that a sign has to other signs, most especially the sorts of mental signs that are
conceived of as concepts.
Most theorists refer to the relation between a sign and its objects, as always including any manner of objective
reference, as its denotation. Some theorists refer to the relation between a sign and the signs that serve in its
practical interpretation as its connotation, but there are many more differences of opinion and distinctions of
theory that are made in this case. Many theorists, especially in the formal semantic, pragmatic, and semiotic
traditions, restrict the application of semantics to the denotative aspect, using other terms or completely ignoring
the connotative aspect.
Phonetics (from the Greek word φωνή, phone meaning 'sound, voice') is the study of the sounds of human
speech. It is concerned with the actual properties of speech sounds (phones), and their production, audition and
perception, as opposed to phonology, which is the study of sound systems and abstract sound units (such as
phonemes and distinctive features). Phonetics deals with the sounds themselves rather than the contexts in which
they are used in languages. Discussions of meaning (semantics) do not enter at this level of linguistic analysis.
articulatory phonetics, concerned with the positions and movements of the lips, tongue, vocal tract and
folds and other speech organs in producing speech;
acoustic phonetics, concerned with the properties of the sound waves and how they are received by the
inner ear; and
auditory phonetics, concerned with speech perception, principally how the brain forms perceptual
representations of the input it receives.
There are over a hundred different phones recognized as distinctive by the International Phonetic Association
(IPA) and transcribed in their International Phonetic Alphabet.
Phonetics was studied as early as 2,500 years ago in ancient India, with P āṇini's account of the place and manner
of articulation of consonants in his 5th century BCE treatise on Sanskrit. The major Indic alphabets today, except
Tamil script, order their consonants according to Pāṇini's classification.
Psycholinguistics or psychology of language is the study of the psychological and neurobiological factors that
enable humans to acquire, use, and understand language. Initial forays into psycholinguistics were largely
philosophical ventures, due mainly to a lack of cohesive data on how the human brain functioned. Modern
research makes use of biology, neuroscience, cognitive science, and information theory to study how the brain
processes language. There are a number of subdisciplines; for example, as non-invasive techniques for studying
the neurological workings of the brain become more and more widespread, neurolinguistics has become a field in
its own right.
Psycholinguistics covers the cognitive processes that make it possible to generate a grammatical and meaningful
sentence out of vocabulary and grammatical structures, as well as the processes that make it possible to
understand utterances, words, text, etc. Developmental psycholinguistics studies infants' and children's ability to
learn language, usually with experimental or at least quantitative methods (as opposed to naturalistic observations
such as those made by Jean Piaget in his research on the development of children).
Sociolinguistics is the study of the effect of any and all aspects of society, including cultural norms, expectations,
and context, on the way language is used. Sociolinguistics overlaps to a considerable degree with pragmatics.
The social aspects of language was in the modern sense first studied by Indian and Japanese linguists in the
1930s, but did not receive much attention in the West until much later. Sociolinguistics in the west first appeared
in the 1960s and was pioneered by linguists such as William Labov in the US and Basil Bernstein in the UK.
Grammar is the study of rules governing the use of language. The set of rules governing a particular language is
the grammar of that language; thus, each language can be said to have its own distinct grammar. Note that the
word grammar has two meanings here: the first is the inner rules themselves and the second is our description and
study of those rules. When a grammar is fully explicit about all possible construction of a specific language it is
called generative grammar. A particular type of generative grammar that has become the leading framework in
modern linguistics is transformational grammar which was first proposed by Noam Chomsky.
Grammar is part of the general study of language called linguistics. Grammar is a way of thinking about language.
As the word is understood by most modern linguists, the subfields of grammar are phonetics, phonology,
orthography, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. Traditionally, however, grammar included only
morphology and syntax.
The Extended Standard Theory (EST) (also widely known as Transformational grammar (TG))
Principles and Parameters Theory (P&P) which includes both Government and Binding Theory (GB) and
the Minimalist Program (MP)
Relational Grammar (RG)
Lexical-functional Grammar (LFG)
The term generative grammar can also refer to a particular set of formal rules for a particular language; for
example, one may speak of a generative grammar of English. A generative grammar in this sense is a formal
device that can enumerate ("generate") all and only the grammatical sentences of a language. In an even narrower
sense, a generative grammar is a formal device (or, equivalently, an algorithm) that can be used to decide whether
any given sentence is grammatical or not.
In most cases, a generative grammar is capable of generating an infinite number of strings from a finite set of
rules. These properties are desirable for a model of natural language, since human brains are of finite capacity, yet
humans can generate and understand a very large number of distinct sentences. Some linguists go so far as to
claim that the set of grammatical sentences of any natural language is indeed infinite.
Generative grammars can be described and compared with the aid of the Chomsky hierarchy proposed by Noam
Chomsky in the 1950s. This sets out a series of types of formal grammars with increasing expressive power.
Among the simplest types are the regular grammars (type 3); Chomsky claims that regular grammars are not
adequate as models for human language, because all human languages allow the embedding of strings within
strings in an hierarchical way.
At a higher level of complexity are the context-free grammars (type 2). The derivation of a sentence by a context-
free grammar can be depicted as a derivation tree. Linguists working in generative grammar often view such
derivation trees as a primary object of study. According to this view, a sentence is not merely a string of words,
but rather a tree with subordinate and superordinate branches connected at nodes.
Essentially, the tree model works something like this example, in which S is a sentence, D is a determiner , N a
noun, V a verb, NP a noun phrase and VP a verb phrase:
The resulting sentence could be The dog ate the bone. Such a tree diagram is also called a phrase marker . They
can be represented more conveniently in a text form, (though the result is less easy to read); in this format the
above sentence would be rendered as: [ S [ NP [D The ] [ N dog ] ] [ VP [V ate ] [ NP [D the ] [ N bone ] ] ] ]
However, Chomsky at some point argued that phrase structure grammars are also inadequate for describing
natural languages. To address this, Chomsky formulated the more complex system of transformational grammar .
When generative grammar was first proposed, it was widely hailed as a way of formalizing the implicit set of
rules a person "knows" when they know their native language and produce grammatical utterances in it. However
Chomsky has repeatedly rejected that interpretation; according to him, the grammar of a language is a statement
of what it is that a person has to know in order to recognise an utterance as grammatical, but not a hypothesis
about the processes involved in either understanding or producing language. In any case the reality is that most
native speakers would reject many sentences produced even by a phrase structure grammar. For example,
although very deep embeddings are allowed by the grammar, sentences with deep embeddings are not accepted by
listeners, and the limit of acceptability is an empirical matter that varies between individuals, not something that
can be easily captured in a formal grammar. Consequently, the influence of generative grammar in empirical
psycholinguistics has declined considerably.
Generative grammar has been used in music theory and analysis such as by Fred Lerdahl and in Schenkerian
analysis. See: Chord progression#Rewrite rules.
Proof theory is a branch of mathematical logic that represents proofs as formal mathematical objects, facilitating
their analysis by mathematical techniques. Proofs are typically presented as inductively-defined data structures
such as plain lists, boxed lists, or trees, which are constructed according to the axioms and rules of inference of
the logical system. As such, proof theory is syntactic in nature, in contrast to model theory, which is semantic in
nature. Together with model theory, axiomatic set theory, and recursion theory, proof theory is one of the so-
called four pillars of the foundations of mathematics.
Proof theory can also be considered a branch of philosophical logic, where the primary interest is in the idea of a
proof-theoretic semantics, an idea which depends upon technical ideas in structural proof theory to be feasible.
Philosophical logic is the study of the more specifically philosophical aspects of logic. The term contrasts with
mathematical logic, and since the development of mathematical logic in the late nineteenth century, it has come to
include most of those topics traditionally treated by logic in general. It is concerned with characterising notions
like inference, rational thought, truth, and contents of thoughts, in the most fundamental ways possible, and trying
to model them using modern formal logic.
Philosophical logic is not concerned with the psychological processes connected with thought, or with emotions,
images and the like. It is concerned only with those entities — thoughts, sentences, or propositions — that are
capable of being true and false. To this extent, though, it does intersect with philosophy of mind and philosophy
of language. Gottlob Frege is regarded by many as the founder of modern philosophical logic.
Not all philosophical logic, however, applies formal logical techniques. A good amount of it (including Grayling's
and Colin McGinn's books cited below) is written in natural language. One definition, popular in Britain, is that
philosophical logic is the attempt to solve general philosophical problems that arise when we use or think about
formal logic: problems about existence, necessity, analyticity, a prioricity, propositions, identity, predication,
truth. Philosophy of logic, on the other hand, would tackle metaphysical and epistemological problems about
entailment, validity, and proof.
Gerhard Gentzen is the founder of proof-theoretic semantics, providing the formal basis for it in his account of
cut-elimination for the sequent calculus, and some provocative philosophical remarks about locating the meaning
of logical connectives in their introduction rules within natural deduction. It is not a great exaggeration that the
history of proof-theoretic semantics since then has been devoted to exploring the consequences of these ideas.
Dag Prawitz extended Gentzen's notion of analytic proof to natural deduction, and suggested that the value of a
proof in natural deduction may be understood as its normal form. This idea lies at the basis of the Curry-Howard
isomorphism, and of intuitionistic type theory. His inversion principle lies at the heart of most modern accounts of
proof-theoretic semantics.
Michael Dummett introduced the very fundamental idea of logical harmony, building on a suggestion of Nuel
Belnap. In brief, a language, which is understood to be associated with certain patterns of inference, has logical
harmony if it is always possible to recover analytic proofs from arbitrary demonstrations, as can be shown for the
sequent calculus by means of cut-elimination theorems and for natural deduction by means of normalisation
theorems. A language that lacks logical harmony will suffer from the existence of incoherent forms of inference:
it will likely be inconsistent.
the syntax of a language is what the language looks like (more formally: the set of possible expressions
that are valid utterances in the language)
the semantics of a language are what the utterances of the language mean (which is formalized in various
ways, depending on the type of language in question)
Genetic relatedness implies a common origin or proto-language, and comparative linguistics aims to construct
language families, to reconstruct proto-languages and specify the changes that have resulted in the documented
languages. In order to maintain a clear distinction between attested and reconstructed forms, comparative linguists
prefix an asterisk to any form that is not found in surviving texts.
A proto-language is a language which was the common ancestor of related languages that form a language
family. The German term Ursprache (derived from the prefix Ur- "primordial" and Sprache "language") is
occasionally used as well.
In most cases, the ancestral proto-language is not known directly and it has to be reconstructed by comparing
different members of the language family via a technique called the comparative method. Through this process
only a part of the proto-language's structure and vocabulary can be reconstructed; the reconstruction remains the
more fragmentary the more ancient the proto-language in question relative to the number of its descendants.
Examples of unattested but (partially) reconstructed proto-languages include Proto-Indo-European, Proto-Uralic,
Proto-Bantu and Proto-Paman. Sometimes, however, the proto-language is a language which is known from
inscriptions, an example being the Proto-Norse language attested in the Elder Futhark runic inscriptions, or very
well-known, such as Latin ("Proto-Italic").
Historical linguistics (also diachronic linguistics) is the study of language change. It has five main concerns:
to reconstruct the pre-history of languages and determine their relatedness, grouping them into language
families (comparative linguistics);
Etymology is the study of the history of words - when they entered a language, from what source, and how their
form and meaning have changed over time.
In languages with a long written history, etymology makes use of philology, the study of how words change from
culture to culture over time. However, etymologists also apply the methods of comparative linguistics to
reconstruct information about languages that are too old for any direct information (such as writing) to be known.
By analyzing related languages with a technique known as the comparative method, linguists can make inferences
about their shared parent language and its vocabulary. In this way, word roots have been found which can be
traced all the way back to the origin of, for instance, the Indo-European language family.
Even though etymological research originally grew from the philological tradition, nowadays much etymological
research is done in language families where little or no early documentation is available, such as Uralic and
Austronesian.
The word etymology itself comes from the Greek ἔτυμον (étymon, true meaning, from 'etymos' true) and λόγος
(lógos, word). The term was originally applied to the search of supposedly "original" or "true" meanings of words,
on principles that are rejected as unscientific by modern linguistics. Pindar employed creative etymologies to
flatter his patrons. Plutarch employed etymologies insecurely based on fancied resemblances in sounds. Isidore of
Seville's Etymologiae was an encyclopedic tracing of "first things" that remained uncritically in use in Europe
until the fifteenth century. Etymologicum genuinum is a grammatical encyclopedia edited at Constantinople in the
ninth century, one of several similar Byzantine works. The fourteenth-century Legenda Aurea begins each vita of
a saint with a fanciful excursus in the form of an etymology.
When John Dee and Edward Kelley received a new magickal system from Angelic beings in the late 1500s, it
included information concerning the Angelic language. We have only small samples of the language: including
the famed "48 Angelic Keys", and several tablets and seals containing Divine and Angelic Names. It seems to
possess it's own unique grammar and syntax, as well as it's own alphabet. The Angels informed the two mages
that this was the language which all Angels speak, as well as being the original language of Eden, with which
Adam named (in an occult sense) all things in existence. The Archangel Gabriel tells us the following on April 21,
1583 ( A True and Faithful Relation p. 92-3):
whereby even as the mind of man is moved at an ordered speech, and is easily persuaded in things that are true, so
are the creatures of God stirred up in themselves, when they hear the words wherewithal they were nursed and
brought forth: For nothing moveth, that is not persuaded: neither can any thing be persuaded that is unknown. The
Creatures of God understand you not, you are not of their Cities: you are become enemies, because you are
separated from him that Governeth the City by ignorance.
Man in his Creation, being made an Innocent, was also authorized and made partaker of the Power and Spirit of
God: whereby he not only did know all things under his Creation and spoke of them properly, naming them as
they were: but also was partaker of our presence and society, yea a speaker of the mysteries of God; yea, with
God himself: so that in innocency the power of his partakers with God, and us his good Angels, was exalted, and
so became holy in the sight of God [Hebrew] is not of that force that it was in his own dignity, much less to be
compared with this that we deliver, which Adam verily spake in innocency, and was never uttered nor disclosed
to man since till now, wherein the power of God must work, and wisdom in her true kind be delivered: which are
not to be spoken of in any other thing, neither to be talked of with man's imaginations; for as this Work and Gift is
of God, which is all power, so doth he open it in a tongue of power, to the intent that the proportions may agree in
themselves: for it is written, Wisdom sitteth upon an Hill, and beholdeth the four Winds, and girdeth herself
together as the brightness of the morning, which is visited with a few, and dwelleth alone as though she were a
Widow.
Thus you see the Necessity of this Tongue: The Excellency of it, and the Cause why it is preferred before that
which you call Hebrew: For it is written, Every lesser consenteth to his greater. I trust this is sufficient.
The saga of the Angelic language is recorded in Dr. Dee's diaries. It begins on March 26, 1583- where the Liber
Logaeth (Book of the Speech From God) is revealed to Kelley. The book was described as being "all full of
squares" and written in a completely alien tongue. The characters used are the same ones that appear on the Holy
Table of Practice, as well as the Lamen that Dee was to wear hidden away in a piece of white silk whenever he
called upon the Angels.
Usually, the Angelic language is studied in it's English transliteration. Kelley had originally seen Logaeth written
in Angelic characters, and the Archangel Raphael began the transmission of the text by naming each character one
by one. However, this was an extremely tedious and time-consuming process. Dee finally asked if Roman
characters could be used instead, and the Angels grudgingly consented. This was basically the last we saw of the
Angelic characters.
The alphabet itself was shown to Kelley on May 6, 1583, directly upon a page in his journal, in a golden
("yellow") color. He was then able to trace the characters before the astral impression faded, and thus the alphabet
was recorded for our use today. However, beyond the already mentioned Table and Lamen, there is no existing
information on how the characters might be used, or what exactly they might mean. The purpose of this essay is
to address that issue, and to offer some historically sound methods of working with the Angelic letters.
Language of Power
The letters number 21, and their names were given in three sets of seven (which Donald Tyson calls "families")-
suggesting a highly mystical interpretation. Below is a table of the letters, along with their names and phonetic
values:
The largest clue to their use is suggested by the very nature of the Angelic language itself. As Gabriel explained
above, it is a magickal language of power rather than an earthly spoken tongue. It is obvious that not just any text
can be transliterated into the Angelic characters, nor is it to be used for everyday speech. As is evidenced by Liber
Logaeth, it is literally a language of creative force.
It seems to me (and I am hardly the first to consider this possibility) that the characters are ultimately similar to
Runes or Ogham. Like Angelic, these alphabets existed unto themselves, and were not simply fancy forms of
already-existing letters. (Such as the various Hebrew-based magickal alphabets: Malachim, Passing the River,
Celestial, etc. These can all be found in Agrippa's Three Books of Occult Philosophy.) Instead, these alphabets
were used strictly for mystical purposes- to inscribe holy objects and texts. Each character is a magickal sigil over
and above any relation to a phonetic value.
The Angels themselves did have a thing or two to say about Angelic writing, though it is admittedly cryptic. So
far, no one has been able to discover the specific mysteries implied by their descriptions. To begin with, each
letter of each word in the Keys was assigned a number- though this stopped early in the process. For instance, the
word "Zorge" (Be Friendly Unto Me) was delivered as follows:
E The 6th. From the right angle uppermost to the left, 700
O The 32nd. Descending from the right angle to the center, 32000
The first number (6th, 13th, etc) refers to the page number in Liber Logaeth from which the letter was taken. Each
page (or Table) of Logaeth represents an occult force, and the words contained in the Table are the words of
creation uttered by God to manifest that force. (See Genesis I, and the many instances of "God said") Therefore,
each letter of every word in the Angelic Keys was taken from a specific Table, and from a specific Word of
Creation therein. Each word, then, is a compilation of various Divine Forces, making each a specific creative
formula.
What follows the Table numbers in the above is anyone's guess. It seems obvious that it has some relation to the
particular location of the letter on the Table. However, the pattern involved has yet to be discovered. Even if one
were to number every letter on a Table (which is 49 x 49 squares large per side), you would still not come up with
numbers as large as 194000. It is most likely that these numbers are not to be taken literally. For instance, it is
unlikely that 194000 is actually to be understood as one hundred ninety four thousand.
When Kelley asked the Archangel Gabriel about these numbers, he replied as follows ( A True and Faithful
Relation p. 92):
Brother, what is the cause that all the World is made by numbers? The Numbers we speak of, are of reason and
form, and not of merchants.
Every letter signifieth the member of the substance whereof it speaketh. Every word signifieth the quiddity of the
substance. The Letters are separated, and in confusion: and therefore, are by numbers gathered together: which
also gathered signify a number: for as every greater containeth his lesser, so are the secret and unknown forms of
things knit up in their parents: Where being known in number they are easily distinguished, so that herein we
teach places to be numbered: letters to be elected from the numbered, and proper words from the letters,
signifying substantially the thing that is spoken of in the center of his Creator, whereby even as the mind of man
is moved at an ordered speech. [etc].
Gabriel is, of course, discussing the gathering of the letters from their various positions in Logaeth. He also
implies the concepts of Gematria- where occult meanings and relationships between words can be discovered by
finding their numerical values. However, Gematria depends on assigning numbers to each letter of the alphabet,
and applies most directly to languages that use their alphabetic characters as a number system as well. Thus, in
Hebrew, the letter "Gimel" has the phonetic value of "G" as well as the numeric value of three. The letters in any
Hebrew word can be added for a numeric total- which can then be worked with after the fashion of numerology.
Angelic characters are not given any such values. In fact, any given Angelic letter might be related to many
different numbers throughout the text of the Keys. For instance, we have such examples as the following:
Os = 12 Mapm = 9639 Acam = 76999
Cla = 456 Af = 19 Ni = 28
Pd = 33 Peoal = 69636 Ox = 26
This merely scratches the surface of the odd numbers that appear in the Angelic Keys. It also serves to illustrate
the complications in attempting to create a system of Angelic Gematria. Finally, it sheds no light at all upon the
large "positional" numbers given with the letters of the Keys. It is very possible that any form of Angelic
Gematria will have to come from that system, utilizing Liber Logaeth itself.
With Gematria being left on the back burner for now, we are left to question other possibilities of working with
the Angelic language. Beyond what Gabriel tells us above, the diaries are silent concerning the sigil-like nature of
the characters. However, it is possible to study the methods used by mages of the past in working with their
sacred alphabets. Even John Dee himself was familiar with several techniques- mainly concerning the use of
Hebraic characters- which may have been exactly what Gabriel was referring to when he stated: "it is preferred
before that which you call Hebrew."
The Three Books of Occult Philosophy, written by Henry Cornelius Agrippa in 1509 CE, has been invaluable to
my own studies of the Angelic (or "Enochian") material. It is well known that Dee himself owned a copy, and that
elements of that work can be found throughout his Angelic system of magick. The book is even mentioned once
in the diaries, in connection with the reception of the 91 (or 92) Parts of the Earth. Therefore, when we are faced
with such an enigma as the Angelic alphabet (and how to use it), it makes sense to return to this source material-
to see what Agrippa had to say concerning sacred alphabets and characters.
The relevant sections of Agrippa's work are contained in Book Three, and begin with a chapter entitled,
appropriately enough, Of The Tongue Of The Angels, And Of Their Speaking Amongst Themselves, And With Us
(Ch. 23). No doubt this was of profound interest to Dee and Kelley. Over the next few chapters, we are taught
various methods of discovering and formulating names for Angels and spirits set over anything in existence. They
include everything from obtaining the names in a code-like fashion from sacred scripture to creating new names
through various Qabalistic cipher tables. He tells us in chapter 24:
But the masters of the Hebrews think that the names of angels were imposed upon them by Adam, according to
that which is written, the Lord brought all things which he had made unto Adam, that he should name them, and
as he called anything, so the name of it was. Hence, the Hebrew mecubals think, together with magicians, that it is
in the power of man to impose names upon spirits, but of such a man only who is dignified, and elevated to his
virtue by some divine gift, or sacred authority.
But because a name that may express the nature of divinity, or the whole virtue of angelical essences cannot be
made by any human voice, therefore names for the most part are put upon them from their works, signifying some
certain office, or effect, which is required by the quire of spirits: which names then no otherwise than oblations,
and sacrifices offered to the gods, obtain efficacy and virtue to draw any spiritual substance from above or
beneath, for to make any desired effect.
Of course, Agrippa uses Hebrew throughout the text to illustrate the various methods of name generation.
However, he also states the following in chapter 27:
because the letters of every tonguehave in their number, order, and figure a celestial and divine original, I shall
easily grant this calculation concerning the names of spirits to be made not only by Hebrew letters, but also by
Chaldean, and Arabic, Egyptian, Greek, Latin, and any other, the tables being rightly made after the imitation of
the precedents.
This kind of philosophy takes on a deeper significance when we remember that Dee and Kelley were reading this
in 1583. It sheds much light on Gabriel's statement that Angelic "is preferred before that which you call Hebrew."
My proposal is twofold: In the first place, the Angelic alphabet can be used in place of Hebrew in the various
calculatory methods. In the second place, there is reason enough to believe that the alphabet might have been
meant for use in just this fashion.
Of Finding Out The Names of Spirits, And Geniuses From The Disposition Of The Celestial Bodies
Such is the name of chapter 26, book three, of Agrippa's Occult Philosophy. This technique is one that I find
extremely fascinating, yet it has been a largely ignored subject in current magickal literature. The chapter begins
as follows:
The ancient magicians did teach an art of finding out the name of a spirit to any desired effect, drawing it from the
disposition of the heaven; as for example, any celestial harmony being proposed to thee for the making an image
or ring, or any other work to be done under a certain constellation thou will find out the spirit that is the ruler of
that work
A vitally important aspect of renaissance magick was the observance of astrological forces. In fact, a large portion
of classical occult literature is devoted to magickal timing based upon the results of natal chart interpretations.
Just as John Dee used this art to schedule a time for the Queen's inauguration ceremony, so too would he have
cast horoscopes to determine the best times for his magickal operations.
In this way, strict magickal timing was often observed- during which various shamanic workings could be done.
This included astral trips, spirit work, the fashioning of talismans, divinations, etc- all without much use of
ceremony. The natural astrological forces of the time, along with the right prayers (perhaps some incense and holy
water) was all that this form of magick required. It is from these practices that we hear of spirits ruling for limited
periods of time, and texts that suggest spirits can only be contacted under specific astrological conditions.
The process outlined by Agrippa begins with this step- casting a natal chart for the desired time of working. If a
chart shows itself to be particularly bad, it is assumed that one will automatically cast a new chart and reschedule.
Once the final chart is drawn, it is first necessary to calculate the degree of the ascendant. Agrippa has us, then,
place the Hebrew letter Aleph in that degree, and continue to write the alphabet all the way around the chart. Each
degree is assigned a single letter, and the direction is counterclockwise to follow the natural course of the twelve
zodiacal signs. When the end of the alphabet is reached, one simply begins anew with the letter Aleph, and
continues onward until all 360 degrees have been filled. (It is highly unlikely that anyone would actually draw a
chart massive enough to display all 360 letters. However, with the number of letters in the alphabet being known
[Hebrew = 22, Angelic = 21] one can easily calculate the proper letter for any given degree).
From there one only needs to interpret the chart as normal, making distinctions between the planets with good
dignities and those with bad. The concept is to focus on the specific forces one needs most for the work at hand-
in a fashion not at all unlike talismatic imaging. Ignoring the weaker and negative aspects of the chart, one can
"compile" those forces that are necessary to the magickal goal. These are, in a literal sense, the Forces (and thus
Gods, Angels, etc) which one is attempting to call upon.
Each degree which contains a desired aspect of the chart now has a letter associated, and these are gathered
together to formulate a name. The ordering follows the same pattern as above- begin at the ascendant, and
continue counterclockwise from there. The letters of the name fall in order as they are encountered along the way.
A "qliphothic" name can also be derived using the same process. However, the entire process must be followed
clockwise, or against the natural order of the signs. Agrippa also suggests that some began this counter-process
from the degree of the descendent, rather than the ascendant. The text goes on to give further methods of
performing the same process, though I leave study that for the aspiring student.
The name that is thus derived is the genius or intelligence set over that specific time, and the mage's magickal
work. Agrippa explains that this method can even be used to find the name of one's personal genius, or (as we call
it today) the Lesser Guardian Angel. This is the Angel you learned about while growing up- who sits on your right
shoulder and attempts to talk you out of bad deeds. This is the Guardian Angel that is often credited with keeping
people from physical harm. Also, as Agrippa explains, this is the Angel set over your home, career, and all such
mundane aspects of your life. I should note that this is not the Holy Guardian Angel described in the Book of
Abramelin, who is more concerned with your ultimate spiritual evolution.
As for calculating the Lesser Guardian's name, one only needs to construct their own natal chart, and proceed as
instructed above. To make the name proper in a Qabalistic sense, one must append the name with "El" or "Yah" in
the style of the Shem haMephoresh. On the other hand, it would seem that this is not necessary when working
with something other than one's personal genius. However, if one is using the Angelic alphabet, there should be
no need for this convention in any case.
This is the name of chapter 27 in the Third Book of Occult Philosophy. This section gives us further methods of
working with the name obtained via the methods of chapter 26. It involves permutating the name of the
intelligence to discover an entire hierarchy of Angels who rule above the intelligence himself. It is possible to
generate nine such names- one for each of the nine traditional Angelic Choirs: the Angels, Archangels,
Principalities, Virtues, Powers, Dominations, Thrones, Cherubim, and Seraphim. (See Agrippa, Book II, Ch. 12:
Of the Number of Nine, and the Scale Thereof .).
To begin with, I will illustrate the table used in this procedure, replacing the Hebrew with Angelic characters:
Table of the Seven Planets
Luna Merc Ven Sol Mars Jup Sat Good
T B K G D F A E B
S M Y H L P Q N K
V X O R Z V S T G
Z B K G D F A E D
R M Y H L P Q N F
O X O R Z V S T A
X B K G D F A E E
N M Y H L P Q N M
Q X O R Z V S T Y
P B K G D F A E H
L M Y H L P Q N L
H X O R Z V S T P
Y B K G D F A E Q
M M Y H L P Q N N
E X O R Z V S T X
A B K G D F A E O
F M Y H L P Q N R
D X O R Z V S T Z
G B K G D F A E V
K M Y H L P Q N S
B X O R Z V S T T
Evil Sat Jup Mars Sol Ven Merc Luna
This table consists of two outer columns and seven inner columns. The right-hand outer column (marked "good")
is called The Entrance of the Good Angels, and includes the Angelic alphabet written in order from top to bottom.
The left-hand outer column (marked "evil") is called The Entrance of the Evil Angels, and includes the Angelic
alphabet written in reverse order. The center columns include the alphabet written from left to right, in seven letter
sections, repeating all the way to the bottom of the table. Each of these seven columns is assigned one of the
Planetary forces.
In order to use this table, one must enter the desired name (i.e.- that obtained from the natal chart) into the proper
outer column. Those names taken from the ascendant counterclockwise will enter from the right, and those taken
from the descendent counterclockwise will enter from the left. To illustrate the process, I will use the Angelic
name of "Madimi". (This was an Angel that appeared to Dee and Kelley quite often.) We will pretend that we
have generated this name via an astrological chart. The following illustrates Madimi's name in Angelic characters,
along with some fictional planetary attributes as if taken from the degrees of our chart.
M M Mars
A A Sol
D D Mercury
I Y Jupiter
M M Venus
I Y Luna
In this example, we would assume that these six planets fell in favorable aspects, while Saturn somehow fell
weakly or negatively and was thus excluded. Madimi being a good Angel, we would look for the M (Tal) in the
right-hand column. Tal is associated with Mars in this instance, therefore we scan to the center column of Mars.
There we find the letter P (Mals), which becomes the first letter of the new name. The next letter of Madimi's
name is A (Un), and is associated with Sol. Finding Un in the right-hand column and moving across to the column
of Sol, we find the letter Z (Ceph). The process continues in this pattern until we run out of letters. For ease of
study, I will illustrate the new name as it appears in Angelic characters:
P P Mars
Z Z Sol
K K Mercury
S S Jupiter
H H v Venus
X X Luna
This process has granted us a new Angelic name. The name "Pzkshx" is merely the first of nine possible names
that can be generated with this table, and (according to Agrippa) is a member of the Angelic Choir known as the
"Angels". This name can then be entered into the table just as we did with Madimi, to generate a name for the
next Angelic Choir, the Archangels: This can then be entered into the table to generate a name for the
Principalities. The process can continue until you reach the choir of Seraphim. For the purposes of practical
magick, I will add the descriptions of the powers of each Hierarchy as given in the Book of the Sacred Magic of
Abramelin the Mage (Dover, p. 260-1)
The spirits of the Seraphim serve to make thee respected and loved for works of Charity, for that which regardeth
honors and other similar things. In matters of great importance they themselves act; but for matter base and
carnal, it is their subjects who do serve and operate.
The property of the Dominions is to dominate; to procure liberty; to vanquish enemies; to give authority over
Princes, and over all kinds of persons, even Ecclesiastics. The Virtues are proper to give strength and force in all
matters whether of War or Peace; and in all Operations concerning the health of men, and in all maladies for
which the fatal hour hath not yet been written. The Powers have the dominion over all the Inferior Spirits; and this
is why they can serve in all things in general, good or evil, and they be straight and right in execution, very
punctual, very prompt, and exact in their Operations.
The Princes comprise Spirits capable of giving Treasures and Riches, and they or their dependants serve in all the
Operations, being a mass composed of different Orders, and they are sufficiently truthful. The Archangels be
proper to reveal all Occult matters, and all kinds of secret things, such as obscure points in Theology and the Law.
They serve with great diligence. The Angels in general do operate each one according unto his quality. There be
an infinite number of them. They command the Four Princes and the Eight Sub-Princes [of the Qliphothic
hierarchy] in all kinds of Operations.
And this ends our exploration of Agrippa-style name generation, utilizing the Angelic alphabet "before that which
we call Hebrew". What I have outlined here merely scratches the surface of possibilities to be found within the
Three Books of Occult Philosophy as well as other bodies of classical magickal literature. I invite the reader to
continue this research, and to see which methods generate the most useful Angelic names.
Agrippa ends chapter 26 with the following. I have decided to sign off my own essay with these words, as I feel
that Dee himself likely read them and took them close to heart:
And these names being thus distributed according to the proportioned numbers to the starry account, [] whilst the
mind being astonished at the obscurity of them, and deeply intent, firmly believing that something divine is under
it, doth reverently pronounce these words, and names, although not understood, to the glory of God
Enochian is a language. It expresses, through a semiotic apparatus, a constellation of impressions, ideas, and
conceptions in context to a world be it spiritual, physical, or somewhere between. This is an exceedingly broad
understanding of language and in the case of Enochian it is necessary to be broad. Aside from this broad view
Enochian adheres to very few linguistic rules in a consistent manner.
It seems to have all the trapping of a natural language. It has some structures of case, or a root system, or
declensions, conjugations, enclitics, inflections, and a consistent vocabulary - yet all these seem to be so highly
irregular (or so complex) that any method of making systematic sense of them is fruitless. Surely, this owes, in
great deal, to the small volume of text in the language. The conjugation of the verb "I say" will make the first
strata (the truly linguistic aspect) clear while the numerical system will show the latter (how the system seems to
make little or no sense).
It is clear that it has some grammatical forms and consistent vocabulary which makes it extremely tantalizing.
Due to the highly liturgical nature of the calls it is not possible to glean enough evidence from the texts to provide
us with a better mode of critical attack on the language itself. In the end, we are left with the calls of which can be
said that they are apocalyptic in nature (like much of the sessions with the spirits) and seem to deal with a final
judgment by G-d upon the world.
Regarding Orthography and Phonology, the language contains 21 letters virtually all pronounced like English.
There are hard and soft vowels; consonants usually adhere to English rules of pronunciation, and there are no
signs of verifiable non-English sounds (such as those found in Semitic languages for instance).
Enochian seems to use a root system in that a base form is augmented with prefixes and suffixes to determine
grammatical forms. This is the way in which Enochian expresses verb forms:
Enochian tends to show a cross current of linguistic apparati. There is some evidence of case (which was already
lost in English by Dee's day although his knowledge of Latin would make him used to dealing with such a
linguistic system) in Enochian. There is a nominative, accusative, comparative, genitive, dative, and possibly an
instrumental/ablative. The problem in establishing clear cases grammar (or really the sure existence of case) is the
sheer lack of text. There only exist around 250 words and over half of those only occur once. Normal
conversational language requires around 300 to 500 words and the second language is clearly not conversational.
It is highly liturgical, very theological technical, and extremely economic with a single "Enochian word" being
rendered for long strings in English. Sometimes, in contrast to this case theory, there are a copious amounts of
particles and prepositions which do not seem to alter the inflected word which is indicative of a case-less
language although the irregularity of particles does not speak to a particle based language.
Caosg(a) - Earth
Caosg(a) - non. sing.
Caosgi - acc. sing.
Caosgin - comp sing.
Caosgo - gen. sing.
Caosgon - dat. Sing
At it has been pointed out by others, Enochian seems to show some signs of etymology. Biblical words in
defective forms are often linked in syntax to Enochian words. Known examples are:
It has some structures of case, or a root system, or declensions, conjugations, enclitics, inflections, and a
consistent vocabulary - yet all these seem to be so highly irregular (or so complex) that any method of making
systematic sense of them is fruitless. Surely, this owes, in great deal, to the small volume of text in the language.
The conjugation of the verb "I say" will make the first strata (the truly linguistic aspect) clear while the numerical
system will show the latter (how the system seems to make little or no sense).
There are some partial conjugated forms. There seems to be three tense (past, present, and future (perhaps an
imperfect). Passive and Subjunctive forms exist although in no consistent manner. An example:
The root appears to be GOH- with suffixed forms to indicate conjugation much like Latin or Old English.
There is no evidence of a dual form. Needless to say, a very scant grammar. It is impossible to recreate forms
based on other examples due to the paucity of examples and the irregularity of the present ones. Possible roots
include ZIR and IPAM although this is tenuous. The verbs appear to occur in combination with pronoun particles
(like caseless languages).
Pronoun include:
OL - I
ILS (G) - You
TOX (TBL) - Of Him (Genitive? Possessive?)
TIA - His (adjectival form)
PI - She
TIBL - Her (Accusative?)
TIOBL - In Her (Ablative or Locative?)
Z - They
Possible roots here are TBL with a possible I infix for Fem. gender. If this is the case, this is an example of
infixing. There are no articles to speak of although there are some demonstrative forms which act similarly.
The language is concerned with apocalyptic revelations many of which contain numerical importance. There are
also overtones of mystical numerology. There seem to be several names for single numbers (the number 1 has at
least six different forms, the number 2 at least three.)
In Meric Casaubon’s: A True and Faithful Relation of What Passed for so Many Years Between Dr. John
Dee and Some Spirits, we get the following quote:
Gabriel…Every Letter signifieth the Member of the substance whereof it speaketh. Every word signifieth the quiddity of the
substance. The Letters are separated, and in confusion: and therefore, are by numbers gathered together: which also
gathered signify a number: for as every greater containeth his lesser, so are the secret and unknown forms of things knit up
in their parents: Where being known in number they are easily distinguished, so that herein we teach places to be numbered:
letters to be elected from the numbered, and proper words from the letters, signifying substantially the thing that is spoken of
in the center of his Creator, whereby even as the mind of man moved at an ordered speech, and is easily persuaded in thing
that re true, so are the creatures of God stirred up in themselves, when they hear the words wherewithal they were nursed
and brought forth: For nothing moveth that is not persuaded: neither can anything be persuaded that is unknown.
Drawing on the quote and recognizing that every letter contains an essence of subtance, Patricia Shaffer’s
‘Letter Essences’ are also included. To quote from the introduction to her work:
These are the essences, which I have attributed to the individual letters. As I understand it, each letter represents a
sound, which is universal to the mind of man, and so, the essential meaning echoes within every spoken language. The
shapes of the letters or glyphs may vary, but the sound is what imparts the meaning. Each of the individual letters
reflects a pure sound, but certain combinations (e.g., ch, sh, ph) give mixed sounds, and thus, the meanings of such
dyads are subtly enhanced.
Note that she differentiates between the letters I and Y as well as U and V. But her take on using sounds to
represent archetypal qualities in human consciousness is not all that different from the symbolic
representation of the English alphabet in Liber 805.
Scripts
2
Lexicon
Word Meaning
A Un (A)
A- with-
A in, with
A-BABALOND harlot, (of an)
A-BAI stooping,(to the); attacking
A-C-LONDOH kingdom, in thy kingdom
A-CROODZI eginning, thy beginning
A-DEUNE across
A-SOBAM whom, (on)
AAI among
AAIOM among us
AAIOM among us
AAO AMONG
ABARAMIG PREPARE
ABRAASSA provided
ACAM 7699
2
Line items in Red are new words found in Liber Loagaeth; line items in blue are new words found in the Table of 12; line items in green are found on the
perimeter of the Holy Table of Practice. Line items in orange are new words found in the Lamen.
ACHAPH Augoeides
ADGT can
ADNA obedience
ADPHAHT unspeakable
ADRA involutes
AF 19
AFFA empty
AG no, none
3
This word was found accidentally b y misconstruing the word DAMO to ADMO. It is not found in Liber Loagaeth.
AH inner/higher self
AIDROPL governor
ALA place
ALPOD infinite
AMIRAN yourselves
AMMA cursed
ANBPHO the Son of Son of Light (Mercury) gives the holy pentagram.
APILA liveth
AR that
AR to fan or winnow
ARPHE descend
AS was
ASCHA God
ASPT efore
AUDROPL governor
AVINY millstones
AX surround
AXO microcosm
B Pa (B)
BABALOND harlot, a
BABALUN
BABALON
BAEOVIB righteousness
BAGLE for
BAGLE ecause
BAGLE why?
BAGLE for
BAGLE why?
BAGLE ecause
BAGLEN ecause
BALT ustice
BALTOH righteousness, of
BALZARG stewards
BANZES generation
BAR prince
BASGIM day
BASP substantial
BASP substantial
BERIANU unknown
BIAB stand
BLIOR comfort
BLIORS comfort, of
BLIORT comfort, of
BNG guardian
BNG guardian
BOGPA reigns
BOGPA reigns
BOLP e thou
BRANSG guard
BRGDA sleep
BRIN have
BRIN has
BRIN hast
BRINTS have
C Veh (C or K)
CA therefore
CA therefor
CA another
CAB a rod
CACACOM flourish
CACARG until
CACRG until
CAF abides
CAM speaking
CANSE mighty
CAPH in turn
CAPIMALI successively
CARBAF sink
CAS who is
CASARMA whom
CHILDAO diamonds
CHIRLAN rejoices
CHIS are
CIAI 9996
CINXIR mingled
CLA 456
CNILA lood, of
COAZIOR increase
COCASB times
COCASB time
COCASB time, of
COLLAL sleeves
COMO window, a
COMSELH circle, a
CONGAMPHLGH MAN ' S SPIRIT; THE
HOLY GHOST 212
COR number
CORAXO thunders
CORD made
CORDZIZ man
CORMF number
CORMFA numbers
CORMP numbered
CORONZON demon
CRIP ut
CRP ut (alt.sp.)
D Gal (D)
DA there
DAH thrice
DAM several
DAMPH various
DAMPLOZ variety
DAN 3 in 1
DARBS obey
DARG 6739
DARSAR wherefore
DAX loins
DAXZUM seed
DE of
DEF visiting
DEM separate
DIU angle
DIV angle
DIV angle
DINOXA 3 paths
ONIXDAR Proclaiming
Root of Don ( R), which is the root of the word for 'Hell Fire' and the word for
DO 'Sun of God'
DOBIX FALL
DOOAIN NAME
DOSIG NIGHT
DRILPA GREAT
DRILPA GREAT
DRVLTHE The angel of the East is seated with the Daughter of Light
DS WHICH
DS AND
DS THAT
E Graph (E)
E DAUGHTER OF LIGHT
EBAO aethyr
EF VISIT US
EG holy
EL FIRST, THE
ELA FIRST
ELO FIRST
EM NINE
EMNA HERE
EMOD 876
EOAN making
EOPHAN LAMENTATION, OF
ERAN 6332
ES FOURTH
ETHARZI PEACE, IN
F Orth (F)
F VISIT
F VISIT US
FA arrives
FAONTS DWELLING
FAXS 7336
G Ged (G)
31, make, with, name of an angel; meaning ‘Last breath of the living’, spirits, the
GA fifth angel
GAHAL EXISTS
GAMLED the watery loins of the Daughter of Light initiate the East
GANEBUS angelic
GANPOGAN the angelic image of the Sun of God is made in the 4th
GAPH I give Ga
GB slime
GB-EBAO Milk of the stars
4
This word was created by accidentally combining two words in Loagaeth and translating them as one.
5
We found this word during our translation of Liber Loagaeth and translate it as: The spirit of Va, the 5 th Angel is the immortal nature.
6
Ibid.
GE NOT, IS NOT
GE -OOEEON THE EYES NEED ONLY TO (Schuler)
GEDO speech
GEDOTBAR BEGOTTEN
gemph yield
GENADOL PART IN DEO
GG possess, inhabit
GGLPPSA 4TH MINISTER OF VENUS
GI WITH
GIER HARVEST
GIVI STRONGER
GIXYAX EARTHQUAKES
GONO FAITH
GOSAA STRANGER, A
GR Ancestors
GRAA MOON
GRAD moonlight
GRAM lunar
H Na-hath (H)
HA meaning unknown
HAATH WORKS
HAMI CREATURES
HOLDO GROANED
HOLQ MEASURETH
HOLQ MEASURED
HOXMARCH FEAR
I Gon (I)
I IS
IAD GOD
IADNAH KNOWLEDGE, OF
IAIADIX HONOR, OF
IAIAL CONCLUDE US
IALPON BURN
IALPOR FLAMING
IALPRT FLAME
IAO IAO
IAOD BEGINNING
IEH merciful
IHEDVTHARH the fixed stars as receivers of the one spread out against the sky
INSI WALKS
INSI WALK
YOR ROAR
IP NOT
IPAM IS NOT
YRPOIL DIVISION
L Ur (L)
L OF THE FIRST
L FIRST
L ONE
L THE FIRST
L ALL ONE.
LA Of THE FIRST
LAH God
LAP FOR
LAP FOR
LARAG NOR
LARAG NEITHER
LASDI FEET, MY
LAVA PRAY
LEOZ First, the Daughter of Light beholds the Son of Son of Light
LILONON BRANCHES
LML TREASURE
LN the, that
LN -NIA-O THE BEAST (Shueler?)
LO FIRST, THE
LO THE FIRST
LOH eams
LOHOLO SHINES
LONCHO FALL
LONDOH KINGDOMS
LONDOH KINGDOMS
LONSA POWER
LONSHI POWER
LORSLQ FLOWERS
LRASD DISPOSE, TO
LRING STIR UP
M Tal (M)
M EXCEPT
M OF (Schuler)
M except, 9
MA possess
MACOM encompass
MAD god, of
MADRID iniquities
MAH In Darkness
MAIM continuance
MAPM 9639
MARB according
MARTIBAH the Magickal Childe is the sacrifice unto the higher self
MATA millenia
MATB thousand, a
ME DAUGHTER OF LIGHT
MERIFRI angel
MIAM continuance
MIAM continuance
MIAN 3663
MICALP mightier
MICAOLI mighty
MICAOLZ mighty
MICAOLZ mighty
MICMA ehold
MICMA ehold
MIKETH wisdom
MIR torment, a
MIRC upon
MIRC upon
MOLAP men, of
MOLUI surges
MOM moss
MOOOAH it repenteth me
MOZ oy
MOZOD oy of god
MURIFRI angel
N Drun (N)
NA ENOCHIAN LETTER H
NAH glorious
NANBA THORNS
NAP sword
NAZ pillars
NAZ pillars
NAZPSAD sword
NE HOLY
NEC holiness
NEG Holy
NES holiness
NETAAB government
7
This word was already in the dictionary and listed as ‘meaning unknown.’
NGRSATEM Unknown
NI 28
NIIS come ye
NIIS come
NIMB season
NO the hexagram
NOAS BECOME
NOIB YEA
NOMIG EVEN AS
NONCF YOU
NONCF YOU
NOR SONS
NORZ SIX
NOT inside
O Med (O)
O 5, this
OADO WEAVE
OALO I am
OANIO MOMENT, OF A
OBL garland
OBLOC GARLAND, A
OBZA HALF, A
OD AND
OD NOR (AND)
ODO OPEN
ODO OPEN
ODO OPENS
OHIO WOE
OHIO WOE
OHOOOHAATAN GREAT ELEMENTAL KING OF
FIRE 668
OI THIS
OI THIS
OIAD GOD, OF
OL (NONE SHOWN)
OL 24
OL MAKE, I MADE
OLLOG MEN
OLLOR MAN
OLN MADE
OLPIRT LIGHT
OM KNOW
OM UNDERSTAND
OM THE UNDERSTANDING
OMA UNDERSTANDING
OMP UNDERSTANDING
ON MADE, BUILT
ON MADE, BUILT
ON Made, built
ONEDON completion
onphe begotten
ONR Motivation, inspiration —‘inertia’
OOAONA EYES
OOAONA EYES
OOGE
CHAMBER, FOR THE
OP 22
OPHES the 22 by 4
OQ EXCEPT IN
OR ENOCHIAN LETTER F
ORDAN manifest
ORSBA DRUNKEN
ORSBA DRUNKEN
OS 12
OS 12
OSF DISCORD
OX 26
OZAZM MAKE ME
OZAZMA MAKE US
OZIEN HANDS, MY
P Mals (P)
P 8
PA keep
PAAOX remain
PAEB oak, an
PAGE rest
PAID always
PAL dissolution
PAMBT unto me
PAR in them
PARACH equal
PARADIZ irgins
PARM run
PATRALX ROCK
PD 33
PEOAL 69636
PHAR surrender
PI PLACE
PI SHE
PIAMOS RIGHTEOUSNESS, OF
PIDIAI MARBLE
PILAH MOREOVER
PILD CONTINUALLY
PLAPLI PARTAKERS
PLOSI AS MANY
PRAC dwelling in
PRAF dwell
PRAP alance
PRAS unite
PRDZAR diminish
PRES praise
PRIAZ those
PS cubed
PUGO AS UNTO
Q Ger (Q)
Q OR
QANIS OLIVES
QUAR 1636
QUASAHI PLEASURE, OF
QUASB DESTROY
QUIIN WHEREIN
QURLST HANDMAID, A
R Don (R)
RA east
RACLIR weeping
REST PRAISE
RIOR WIDOW, OF A
RIT MERCY, OF
RIT MERCY, OF
RNAH sunrise
RO 3rd minister of Sol (a Son of Son of Light (Jupiter) [cf. Rocle on 7x7 Tablet]
ROR sun
ROXTAN wine
RSAM admiration
AMRVH The power and presence of the Lord of Hosts in the angel of the East
S Fam (S)
S FOURTH
SALD WONDER, OF
SALMAN HOUSE, A
SALMAN HOUSE
SAMHAMPORS the righteous creatures of the Sun of God are separated from the 4th
SE mourning, cry
SEBO separation
SEBRA warning
SEDLO cry gives us the 5 – or- cry gives us the Holy Pentagram
SESQVI the cry of the 4 th, wherein is…/Wherein is the cry of the Daughter of Light
SIATRIS SCORPIONS
SMNAD ANOTHER
SOBA WHOSE
SOBAM WHOM
SONF REIGN
SONF REIGNS
SOR ACTION
SYMP ANOTHER
T Gisa (T)
T IT
T ALSO
TA AS
TABA GOVERN
TABAORI GOVERN
TABAORI GOVERN
TABAS GOVERN
TABGES CAVES
TALHO CUPS
TATAN WORMWOOD
TELOCH DEATH, OF
TELOCH DEATH, OF
TELOCH DEATH
TELOCVOVIM DEATH-DRAGON
THIL SEATS
THILN SEATS, IN
TIA UNTO US
TIBIBP SORROW, OF
TILB HER, OF
TILB HER
TIOBL HER, IN
TIOBL HER, IN
TLB HIM, OF
TOATAR HARKEN
TOH TRIUMPHS
TOHCOTH FAERIES
TOL ALL
TOL ON ALL
TOLTORN CREATURES
TOLTORN CREATURE
TOOAT FURNISHING
TORZU ARISE
TOX HIM, OF
TPRDEMAH of darkness
TRIAN SHALL BE
TRIAN SHALL BE
TRINT SIT
TROF BUILDING, A
TUSTAX GOING
U Val (U, V, W)
V star
VA spirit of Vaa
VADGS time
VAN star
VANDEMINAXAT constellations
VAOAN truth
VAUL work
VAX orbit
VD third star
VELUCORSAPA ENTHRONED
VEP flame, as a
VIRQ nests
VIV second
UL end
ULCININ happy is he
UML add
UN ENOCHIAN LETTER A
UNAL these
UNALAB skirt
UNBA is powerful
UNCHI confound
UNIG requires
UNIGLAG descend
VO wherein
VOHIM mighty
VOM of everyone
VONPHO wrath, of
VOOAN truth
VOR appearance
VORX isits
VORS over
VOVIN dragons
UPAAH WINGS
VPAAH wings
VPAAH wings
UR ENOCHIAN LETTER L
VRBS eautified
VX 42
X Pal (X)
X dissolution
XA in dissolution
Z Ceph (Z)
Z THEY
ZA NAME OF AN ANGEL
ZACAR MOVE
ZAMRAN APPEAR
ZE Daughter of Light
ZIEN HANDS
ZILDAR FLEW
ZIR I AM
ZIR PRESENCE
ZIRDO I AM
ZIRN WONDERS
ZIROP WAS
ZIXLAY TO STIR UP
ZIZOP VESSELS
ZLIDA WATER, TO
ZNRZA SWORE
ZOL HANDS
ZORGE BE FRIENDLY TO ME
ZUMVI SEAS