Program: B.E Subject Name: Geo Technical Engineering Subject Code: CE-8002 Semester: 8th
Program: B.E Subject Name: Geo Technical Engineering Subject Code: CE-8002 Semester: 8th
Program: B.E Subject Name: Geo Technical Engineering Subject Code: CE-8002 Semester: 8th
E
Subject Name: Geo Technical Engineering
Subject Code: CE-8002
Semester: 8th
Downloaded from be.rgpvnotes.in
UNIT II
Deep Foundation
Pile foundation, Types of piles, estimation of individual and group capacity of piles in
cohesion less and cohesive soils. Static and dynamic formulae. Pile load test, Settlement of
pile group, Negative skin friction, under- reamed piles and their design. Piles under tension,
inclined and lateral load Caissons. Well foundation. Equilibrium of wells. Analysis for stability
tilts and shifts, remedial measures.
PILE FOUNDATIONS
Pile foundation is required when the soil bearing capacity is not sufficient for the structure to
withstand. This is due to the soil condition or the order of bottom layers, type of loads on
foundations, conditions at site and operational conditions.
Many factors prevent the selection of surface foundation as a suitable foundation such as the
nature of soil and intensity of loads, we use the piles when the soil have low bearing capacity
or in building in water like bridges and dams
A pile foundation consists of two components: Pile cap and single or group of piles. Piles
transfer the loads from structures to the hard strata, rocks or soil with high bearing capacity.
These are long and slender members whose length can be more than 15m.
Piles can be made from concrete, wood or steel depending on the requirements. These piles
are then driven, drilled or jacked into the ground and connected to pile caps. Pile foundations
are classified based on material of pile construction, type of soil, and load transmitting
characteristic of piles.
The use of pile foundations as load carrying and load transferring systems has been for many
years. Timber piles were used in early days, driven in to the ground by hand or holes were
dug and filled with sand and stones. The use of steel pile started since 19th century and
concrete piles since 20th century.
With the change in technology and industrial revolution, many advance systems have been
developed for pile driving from the invention of steam and diesel pile driving machines.
The use of pile foundations is increasing day by day due to non-availability of land for
construction. Heavy multi-storied building are being constructed, and load from these
structures cannot be directly transferred to ground due to low bearing capacity issue and
stability issues of building during lateral load application. So, demand for use of pile
foundations are increasing day by day. Due to this demand for piles, there have been many
improvements in piles and pile driving technology and systems. Today there are many
advanced techniques of pile installation.
into a tub of frozen ice cream. Once you have pushed it in, it is strong enough to support
some load. The greater the embedment depth in the ice cream, the more load it can support.
This is very similar to how a friction pile works. In a friction pile, the amount of load a pile can
support is directly proportionate to its length.
Concrete piles are precast, that is, made at ground level, and then driven into the ground by
hammering - more on that later. Steel H-piles can also be driven into the ground. These can
take very heavy loads, and save time during construction, as the pile casting process is
eliminated. No protective coating is given to the steel, as during driving, this would be
scraped away by the soil. In areas with corrosive soil, concrete piles should be used.
As pile foundations carry a lot of load, they must be designed very carefully. A good engineer
will study the soil the piles are placed in to ensure that the soil is not overloaded beyond its
bearing capacity. Every pile has a zone of influence on the soil around it. Care must be taken
to space the piles far enough apart so that loads are distributed evenly over the entire bulb of
soil that carries them, and not concentrated into a few areas.
Figure 04: The load pattern of the piles on the soil surrounding them. (Zone of influence)
Engineers will usually group a few piles together, and top them with a pile cap. A pile cap is a
very thick cap of concrete that extends over a small group of piles, and serves as a base on
which a column can be constructed. The load of this column is then distributed to all the piles
in the group. Capacity of pile group is the sum of the individual capacities of piles, but it is
influenced by the spacing between the piles.
Piles are driven generally in groups in regular pattern to support the structural loads. The
structural load is applied to the pile cap that distributes the load to individual piles. If piles
are spaced sufficient distance apart, then the capacity of pile group is the sum of the
individual capacities of piles. However, if the spacing between piles is too close, the zones of
stress around the pile will overlap and the ultimate load of the group is less than the sum of
the individual pile capacities specially in the case of friction piles, where the efficiency of pile
group is much less.
Group action of piles is evaluated by considering the piles to fail as a unit around the
perimeter of the group. Both end bearing and friction piles are considered in evaluating the
group capacity. End bearing pile is evaluated by considering the area enclosed by the
perimeter of piles as the area of footing located at a depth corresponding to the elevation of
pile tips. The friction component of pile support is evaluated by considering the friction that
can be mobilized around the perimeter of the pile group over the length of the piles as shown
in figure below:
Thus, the pile group efficiency is equal to the ratio of the average load per pile in the group at
which the failure occurs to the ultimate load of a comparable single pile.
Efficiency of a pile group can also be obtained by using Converse – Lebarre formula:
in degrees
d = diameter of pile end
s = spacing of piles.
Generally center to center spacing between piles in a group is kept between 2.5 d and 3.5d
where d is the diameter of the pile.
1. Determination of the ultimate load bearing capacity of the group Q u(g)
2. Deter i atio of settle e t of the group s g
It is well known that the ultimate load of the group is generally different from the sum of the
ultimate loads of individual piles Qu(s).
Ef = Qu (g)/nQu(s) ×100% ——— (1)
Where, Ef = Group efficiency ratio
Qu(g) = Ultimate bearing capacity of the pile group
Qu(s) = Ultimate bearing capacity of single pile
The group efficiency depends on the type of soil, method of installation, spacing, load per pile
and numbers of pile in the group.
There is o a epta le effi ie for ula • for group bearing capacity. There are few
formulas such as FLED rule, Converse Labare Formula that are sometimes used by engineers.
These formulas are empirical and give efficiency less than unity. But when piles are installed
in sands efficiency factor can be greater than unity as shown by Vesic. There is not much
experimental evidence to determine the group efficiency for piles embedded in clay soils.
There are many pile group efficiency equations. These equations are to be used cautiously. In
many cases, they are no better than a good guess. The Converse Labare Formula is one of the
most widely used formulae and is expressed as:
Eg = 1 – θ[{(n – 1)m + (m – 1)n}/90mn] ———- (2)
Where, m = number of rows in a group
n = number of piles in a rows
θ = tan-1(d/s)
d = diameter of the piles
s = spacing of the piles
As per Tomlinson, when spacing of piles in a group is twice the pile diameter, the efficiency is
about 0.7. When it is increased to 8 diameters, the efficiency reaches to unity. Thus we can
write,
Qu (g) = η [nQu(s)] ———- (3)
Where, η is the efficiency of the group and n is the number of piles in the group.
Following are general methods available to establish load capacity:
1. Static Analysis
2. Dynamic Analysis
3. Load Testing
4. Correlation with field tests (SPT, CPT etc.)
Dynamic formulae are used for driven piles. Static formulae are used both for bored and
driven piles. Load testing is the most reliable method to determine the load capacity of the
Helical piles are steel tubes that have helical (spiral) blades attached to them. These can be
drilled into the ground, meaning that the pile acts as a giant drill bit, and is rotated and
pushed into the ground from above, much like a screw drills into wood. Once the steel pile is
driven into the ground, a pile cap is poured on top of the pile to prepare it for the
construction above.
Load tests on piles are conducted on completion of 28 days after casting of piles. Two types of
tests namely initial and routine tests, for each type of loading viz. vertical, horizontal (lateral)
pull out, are performed on piles.
This test is performed to confirm the design load calculations and to provide guidelines for
setting up the limits of acceptance for routine tests. It also gives an idea of the suitability of
the piling system. Initial Test on piles are to be carried out at one or more locations
depending on the number of piles required.
Load applied for the initial (cyclic) load test is 2.5 times the safe carrying capacity of the pile.
Loadi g for I itial Tests is o du ted as per Appe di A Clause 6.3of I“-2911 Part IV.
Selection of piles for the Routine Test is done based on number of piles required subject to
maximum of ½% of total number of piles required. The number of tests may be increased to
2% depending on the nature / type of structure. The test load applied is 1½ times the safe
carrying capacity of the pile. The Maintained load method as described in Clause 6.2 of IS-
2911 (Part IV) – 1985 shall be followed for loading for the Routine Tests.
The tests shall be performed at the cut-off level only. A detailed report for the test result is
prepared.
Vertical Load Tests on Piles
This test will be carried out as stipulated in IS-2911 (Part IV) 1995.
the surrounding soil and bearing stratum. Static loads were applied and maintained using a
hydraulic jack and were measured with a load cell. A typical load test arrangement is shown
in figure 21. Reaction to the jack load is provided by a steel frame that is attached to an array
of steel H-piles located at least 3 m away from the test pile. Pile head deflections were
measured relative to a fixed reference beam using dial gauges. Telltale measurements were
made in reference to the pile head or the reference beam using dial gauges. Pile head and
telltale deflection data were recorded for each loading increment.
the added load. If failure at maximum load does not occur, hold load for one hour. At
maximum achieved load, remove the load in four equal decrements, allowing 15
minutes between decrements.
The capacity of the test piles was selected as the greater capacity defined by two failure
criteria. The first criteria establishes the allowable design capacity as "50 percent of the
applied test load which results in a net settlement of the top of the pile of up to 1.3 cm, after
rebound, for a minimum of one hour at zero load." The second criterion uses Davisson's
criteria as described below.
The Davisson offset limit load criterion was used on the project to define the ultimate
capacity, or failure, of the test piles.(52) The ultimate load is interpreted as the point at which
the displacement of the pile head meets a limit that is offset to the elastic compression line of
the pile. For piles less than 61 cm in diameter, the limit is defined by the following linear
relationship:
Sf = Se + (0.38 + 0.008D)
Where,
Sf= Movement of pile top (cm).
D = Pile diameter or width (cm).
Se = Elastic compression of total pile length (cm).
The elastic compression in this case refers to the pile deflection that would occur if 100
percent of the applied load was transferred to the toe of the pile (i.e., zero shaft friction), and
is given by the following equation:
Se = (QL)/(AE)
Where,
Q = Applied load.
L = Total length of pile.
A = Cross-sectional area of the pile.
E = Modulus of elasticity of the pile.
The average load in the pile at the midpoint between two telltale locations was estimated
from the elastic shortening of the pile using the following equation:
Qavg = [AE (D1 – D2 ]/ ΔL
Where,
A = Area of pile.
E = Modulus of elasticity of the pile.
D1 = Deflection at upper telltale location.
D2 = Deflection at lower telltale location.
L = Distance between the upper and lower telltale locations.
Both equations 2 and 3 require the modulus of elasticity of the pile. The specifications require
that the elastic modulus be determined via compression tests performed on representative
concrete samples.
NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION ON PILES AND PILE GROUP
When a fill or load is placed on compressible soil deposit, consolidation of the compressible
material takes place. When the piles are driven through compressible soils before
consolidation is complete or the site has newly placed fill or will be placed in future, the
compressible soil will downward relative to the pile. The downward movement of soil
develops skin friction between the pile and the surrounding soil and it is termed as negative
skin friction. Negative skin friction can be developed from lowering on water level in
compressible soils such as clay, peat, mud and soft soil and also due to increase in stress by
some means (e.g. filling).
Qn = “ L p + γ L A
S – Shear resistance of soil
L – Depth of fill
p – Perimeter of pile group
– Unit weight of soil
A – Area of pile group enclosed in perimeter p.
Under Reamed Pile
Under reamed piles have mechanically formed enlarged bases of size as much as 6 m in
diameter. The form is that of an inverted cone and can only be formed in stable soils. In such
conditions they allow very high load bearing capacities.
The diameter of the pile stem (D) varies from 20 to 50 cm. The diameter of the under-ream
bulbs (Du) is normally 2.5 times the diameter of the pile stem. It may however, vary from 2 to
3 times (D) under special circumstances. In case of double or multi-under-reamed piles, the
center to center vertical spacing between two bulbs may vary from 1 ¼ to 1 ½ times the
under-reamed diameter (Du). The length of under-reamed piles varies from 3 to 8 meter and
their center to center spacing should normally be not less than 2 times the under-reamed
diameter.
Under reamed piles are the most safe and economical foundation in Black cotton soil. Under
reamed piles are bored cast in situ concrete piles having bulb shaped enlargement near base.
A Pile having one bulb is called single under reamed pile. In its closed position, the under
reamer fits inside the straight section of a pile shaft, and can be expanded at the base of the
pile to produce the enlarged base.
The cost advantages of under-reamed piles are due to the reduced pile shaft diameter,
resulting in less concrete needed to replace the excavated material.
of a mild steel equal angle of side 150 mm. In case blasting in anticipated, the outer face of
the well curb should be protected with 6 mm thick steel plate and the inner face should have
10 mm thick plate up to the top of the curb and 6 mm plate further up to a height of 3 m
above the top of the curb.
4. Bottom plug
After the well is sunk to the required depth, the base of the well is plugged with concrete.
This is called the bottom plug. It acts like an inverted dome supported by the steining on all
the sides and transmits the load to the subsoil and acts as a raft against soil pressure from
below. Minimum grade of concrete used in bottom plug is M15. Thickness of bottom plug
should not be less than the half of dredge-hole diameter nor less than the value calculated
using following formula.
Where,
W = total bearing pressure at the base of well,
fc = flexural strength of concrete in bottom plug, , and,
ϑ = Poisso s ratio for o rete, 0.18 to 0.20.
5. Top plug
The top plug is an unreinforced concrete plug, generally provided with a thickness of about
600 mm beneath the well cap to transmit the loads from the pier to the steining. Minimum
grade of concrete used in top plug is M15.
The space inside the well between the bottom of the top plug and the top of bottom plug is
usually filled with clean sand, so that the stability of the well against overturning is increased.
While this practice is good in case of wells resting on sand or rock, the desirability of sand
filling for wells resting on clayey strata is doubtful, as this increases the load on the
foundation and may lead to greater settlement. In the latter case, the sand filling is done only
for the part of well up to scour level, and remaining portion is left free.
6. Intermediate plug
As discussed above, for wells resting on clayey strata, it is not preferable to fill the space
inside the well completely with sand. In such cases, sand filling is not done or sand is filled up
to the scour level. A concrete plug covering the filling is usually provided, known as
intermediate plug. Usually, thickness of intermediate plug is taken as 500 mm.
Sinking of the Well
Laying of Curbs – In dry ground excavate up to 50 cm in river bed and place the cutting edge
at the required position. If the curb is to be laid under water and depth of water is greater
than 5 m, prepare Sand Island and lay the curb. If depth of water exceeds 5 m built curb in dry
ground and float it to the site. A typical sand island is shown in Figure 14 below.
Problem of Sinking – Generally the following problems are encountered while sinking a well.
Tilt and Shift- Adopt the following measures if tilt exceeds 1/60. Dredge at the higher side.
Not effective at greater depths. This is shown in Figure 16 and 17 below.
Figure 16: Dredging the well. Figure 17: Dredging the well.
Make a hole on steining on higher side, hole is made near the ground level and excavation is
carried out by diving. If possible dewater and excavate on the higher side. This is shown in
Figure 18 below.
Construct eccentric welded framed bracket and load the platform thus made with 400 to 600
tons load. This is shown in Figure 18 below.
20below.
Figure 19: Provision of wooden sleepers. Figure 20: Hooking the well.
Pull the well. This is shown in figure 21 below. Strut the well. This is shown in figure 22
below.
Figure 21: Pulling the well. Figure 22: Strutting the well.
Push the well. This is shown in figure 23 below.