177

THE POWER OF UKRAINE’S PRESIDENT:

PERSONAL PRONOUNS ON ZELENSKY’S SPEECH
1Dian Luthfiyati, 2Fitria Nur Hamidah*
1University of Islam Lamongan, Indonesia
2State Polytechnic of Malang PSDKU Kediri, Indonesia

ABSTRACT
This study analyzes how Zelensky used first-person personal pronouns
in his political speeches. This study discussed about the occurrences of
first personal pronouns in political speeches by using qualitative
methodologies, that is document study to identify their forms and
discourse function. The results showed that The first personal pronouns
are identified in discovered of Zelensky’s speeches. The first personal
pronouns used in Zelensky addresses were pronoun “I”, “You”, and “We”.
Zelensky used the singular personal pronoun ‘‘I’’ to express his heartfelt
gratitude and admiration, as well as his professional and personal
E-ISSN: 2621-9158 experiences, arguments, perspectives, aspirations, and commitment. The
P-ISSN:2356-0401 usage of inclusive “You” and variants indicate Zelensky 's willingness to
share responsibility, foster unity, equality, and public declarations about
*Correspondence: their current situation and any potential future challenges. Using
[email protected] exclusive “We” which demonstrated by Zelensky also was to show his
political intentions, commitment, political experiences during the
Submitted: 14 November 2022 election, and significant concern for reconciliation.
Approved: 27 December 2022
Published: 29 December 2022
Keywords: Personal; Pronouns; President; Speech

Citation: ABSTRAK
Luthfiyati, D., & Hamidah, F., N., Studi ini menganalisis bagaimana Zelensky menggunakan kata ganti
(2022). The Power of Ukraine’s
President: Personal Pronouns on
orang pertama dalam pidato politiknya. Penelitian ini membahas tentang
Zelensky’s Speech. Celtic: A Journal kemunculan kata ganti orang pertama dalam pidato politik dengan
of Culture, English Language menggunakan metodologi kualitatif untuk mengidentifikasi bentuk dan
Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, fungsi wacananya. Kata ganti pribadi pertama diidentifikasi dalam
9(2),177-189. Doi:
10.22219/celtic.v9i2.23186.
pidato Zelensky yang ditemukan. Kata ganti orang pertama yang
digunakan dalam alamat Zelensky adalah kata ganti "Aku", "Kamu", dan
"Kami". Zelensky menggunakan kata ganti pribadi tunggal '' Saya '' untuk
mengungkapkan rasa terima kasih dan kekagumannya yang tulus, serta
pengalaman, argumen, perspektif, aspirasi, dan komitmen profesional
dan pribadinya. Penggunaan inklusif “Anda” dan varian menunjukkan
kesediaan Zelensky untuk berbagi tanggung jawab, memupuk persatuan,
kesetaraan, dan deklarasi publik tentang situasi mereka saat ini dan
potensi tantangan di masa depan. Menggunakan “Kami” eksklusif yang
didemonstrasikan oleh Zelensky juga untuk menunjukkan niat
politiknya, komitmennya, pengalaman politiknya selama pemilu, dan
kepedulian yang signifikan terhadap rekonsiliasi.

Kata Kunci: Personal; kata ganti; presiden; pidato

INTRODUCTION
Language, such as that employed in speech, can be utilized to influence, or build
relationships. According to Pradiptha et al., (2020), Speech is a manifestation of
power, which suggests that when someone delivers a speech, he or she has the
potential to influence how other people feel about a particular subject. To put it
another way, the speakers can persuade the audience that they share the same

Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics Vol. 9, No. 1, December 2022
http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/celtic/index
Dian Luthfiyati, Fitria Nur Hamidah
The Power of Ukraine’s President:
Personal Pronouns on Zelensky’s Speech

thoughts. As a result, they may gain sympathy. A speech has the power to change
people's minds about a topic. As a result, the speaker must include personal
motives in his or her discourse. Additionally, the structural analysis of the
meanings done behind the speech is possible. Talking is a common activity that
involves multiple participants, each of whom takes turns at various points (Sari,
2020).
Under any circumstances, one of the persons involved in an interaction
process seems to have a propensity to assert their dominance by virtue of their
social standing, level of education, worldly wisdom, experience, age, etc. Language
will be used in a biased manner by individuals in positions of power, such as those
with a prestigious job, a high social status, or a significant political role. In the
course of the engagement process, people with greater status tend to dominate
and become engaged. People of lower status, on the other hand, come across as
passive listeners (Dahnilsyah, 2017).
We must first organize the messages we wish to transmit through voice in
order to communicate effectively (Cordeiro, 2018). Message organization involves
both sending and receiving messages, and this relationship may be more nuanced
than it first looks. If we ask other to receive and to give when we invite other. To
suit their demands, speech functions are used as a means of exchanging
experiences. Speech functions are communication tactics to transmit someone's
idea and to assist listeners in understanding and comprehending the idea based on
the situation (Dunn et al., 2022); (Mensah et al., 2022).
Instead of being a genre in and of itself, political discourse is a class of
genres distinguished by a social domain, particularly politics. Parliamentary
debates, political party programs, and speeches by political leaders are a few
genres that belong in the political sphere. In spoken political discourse, a speech is
a public speaking act that is typically carried out in a formal setting to
communicate an opinion (Wahyuningsih, 2018).
Political discourse analysis is a field of study that looks at the written, oral,
and nonverbal communication that politicians use to advance their agendas in a
political setting. The objectives are to examine the use of language and rhetorical
devices, as well as linguistic decisions made to accomplish a particular political
outcome (Bataineh, 2019). Besides, the purposes are to persuade the audience or
the listener to have agreement with them or to encourage a change in perception
or attitude toward a special issue (Orji, 2016).
In this technology era, a politician's speech can easily be broadcast around
the world. The result showed their audience were not only those in the hall, but
also those behind the screen. So when the politician wanted to gain political
support, a political speech must be understandable and it could appeal to the
audience (Fadzilah & Noor, 2021). Fadzilah & Noor (2021) goes even farther,
claiming that personal pronouns, with their deictic function, are one of the
weapons in politicians' arsenals for achieving their objectives. The skill of
persuasion has been important in politics since the dawn of civilization. In this
context, personal pronouns depict how the person who speaks and writes to
communicate his or her opinion and perception to other participants in the
conversation.

178
Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics Vol. 9, No. 2, December 2022
http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/celtic/index

The power to influence people's hearts or change their minds is

demonstrated by a politician's command of rhetorical skills. A successful outcome
of a convincing political speech could have a significant impact on the country and
even internationally. When selecting the most acceptable persuasive tactic to
employ in a speech, there are a few things to keep in mind. The way the speaker
addresses someone or himself directly affects how personal pronouns are used in a
speech. It is implied that using a specific personal pronoun to refer to someone
may reveal how distant the speaker and audience are from one another
(Suryaningsih, 2021).
The current study, titled "The Power of Ukraine's President: Personal
Pronouns on Zelensky’s Speech," uses Discourse Analysis (DA) to figure out how
interpersonal function is realized in Volodymyr Zelensky's speech. Speech was
chosen as the study's subject because it had interpersonal component; not only
because it was presented verbally, implying a relationship between someone who
delivered a speech and the audience, but also because it was fashioned as a well-
prepared and well-structured text.
In this situation, Zelensky's speech was classified into political speech,
which meant he demonstrated his political stance and his assumptions to the
audience who listened his speech and he wanted to to persuade the audience to act
like his thoughts and even his instructions.
The phenomenon of speech function, individuals have required other
people to act as both listeners and talking partners to communicate. Due to
differences in each person's capacity to implement their language and linguistics,
as well as their cultural background, these acts result in a variety of phenomena. It
was indisputable that cannot understand between listeners and speakers occur
because of these differences, especially when both listeners and speakers in
communication are non-native speakers. This phenomenon has an impact on the
president's speech function. Words and phrases that are commonly found in the
study and substance can cause a phenomenon in a speech by Zelensky. Because it
is advantageous for Zelensky to utilize personal pronouns as a politician, he
employs them instead of mentioning the name in his speech. Because words have
such a profound influence on our minds, the words we choose alter how we see
others and ourselves. The usage of personal pronouns can have a variety of
meanings.
Politicians take advantage of the pliability of pronominal reference to
establish their good image of themselves and others purposes (Bramley, 2001).
Furthermore, personal pronouns are linked to the authority-solidarity
relationship. Researchers focused on explaining sorts of speech functions in this
study, which is like earlier studies. However, the dominant type of speech function
in speech is also needed for this study.
The speech's textual metafunction suggested that an unmarked topic
employs the notion that it was a declarative speech that served to provide
information or clarity. Finally, the address served as a clarification of the royal split
as well as a charity speech (Handayani, 2021). On Joe Biden's victory speech,
(Darong, 2021) analyzed about the interpersonal metafunction. Joe Biden utilized a
lot of declarative phrases, modality, and the pronoun 'we’. By using metafunction
in speech, it was planned to investigate how language was conveyed to

179
Dian Luthfiyati, Fitria Nur Hamidah
The Power of Ukraine’s President:
Personal Pronouns on Zelensky’s Speech

communicate the experience. Some YouTube videos made use of the speech and
realization in frame of mind for a variety of purposes, including understanding the
text, particularly in speech. It was critical to understand the components of the
speech function process so the reader did not have a different viewpoint on the
meaning (Herman et al., 2022).
Personal, reflexive, possessive, indefinite, demonstrative, reciprocal,
relative, and interrogative pronouns are among the eight categories of pronouns
(Kaewrungruang & Yaoharee, 2018). When referring to individuals or objects that
the speaker is speaking to or about, personal pronouns are employed. Subjective
pronouns and objective pronouns are the two categories of personal pronouns. I,
we, you, he, she, it, and they are the subjective pronouns that are used to refer to
the subject of a clause. The subject complement, prepositional complement, or
object of a clause can all be expressed by object pronouns. Me, us, you, him, she, it,
and them make up the list of objective personal pronouns.
Professional speechwriters typically draft the speeches in advance for the
speakers. Political speeches are rarely broadcast in their entirety. Instead, only
selected portions of the speeches—often referred to as soundbites—are televised
(Håkansson, 2012). We may not think about or even notice the usage of personal
pronouns when hearing or reading speeches. Political speeches frequently utilize
personal pronouns because they can indicate with whom the speaker is most
identified.
A variety of studies from different perspectives have been done on
presidential speeches. The language of the presidential speech has recently come
under scrutiny. The president may be viewed as the country's most competent
representation since his or her remarks serve to encapsulate the spirit and ethos of
the country. Language is used to prepare, accompany, influence, and play the
speech. The speech's language signals intentions, goals, and purposes in addition
to conveying the information itself. Language organizes, supports, shapes, and
plays the speech (Ekawati, 2016). The speech's language signals intentions, goals,
and purposes in addition to conveying the information itself.
The employment of personal pronouns by President Zelensky in political
discourse is the subject of this essay. It is clear that the president is attempting to
set his action apart from others by using a personal pronoun in specific intended
allusions. In an effort to persuade the audience, the president also makes an
exceptional effort to assert his dominance over the situation. Given their position
of influence, most politicians find that their ability to manipulate language is
crucial to garnering attention and popular support. Politicians believe that
acquiring and empowering language units that can adapt to a variety of contexts
and communication situations is necessary to attaining their goals.
Politicians will find it simpler to win the public's sympathy and support if
they pay attention to and develop sensitivity to their requirements. They will also
be better able to cover up their practices of hegemony and dominance. Utilizing
personal pronouns is one of the tactics used by politicians to win over the public
and keep their government in power. So, this study examines the occurrences of
first personal pronouns in political speeches.

180
Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics Vol. 9, No. 2, December 2022
http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/celtic/index

METHOD
Research Design
To analyze the challenges posed in this study, descriptive qualitative was used for
the goals and goal of this investigation. Because the data in this study consisted of a
voice script, the content analyzing approach was applied. The research looks at in
Zelensky's speech. The complexity of meanings in social contexts is addressed in
this descriptive qualitative essay. In order to gain understanding of a specific
phenomenon of interest, qualitative research focuses on the collection, analysis,
and interpretation of data (Gay et al., 2012). This study used Fairclough 's (1995)
Model of Critical Discourse Analysis as its theoretical foundation (CDA).
The use of quantification for the number of data was necessary to depict the
distribution of first personal pronouns in the speeches. After the data has been
quantified, the most prevalent first personal pronouns must be identified to
develop a tendentious image provided by in Zelensky's through the usage of
personal pronouns.
The next phase which was related to the second purpose of this study, it
was to interpret the reasonable explanation of the usage of personal pronouns
with contextual meaning during the speeches delivered. It considered that
argumentative interpretation when determining which first personal pronouns are
most employed. When examining inclusive and exclusive, we must analyze which
Zelensky's addressed in his speech. The speaker's use of personal pronouns
created a different purpose and function for the social relationship between the
speaker and the hearer.
The researchers obtained the speech's transcript from Official website of the
President of Ukraine, which was published on June 15, 2022. “Address by the
President of Ukraine to both houses of the Parliament of the Czech Republic” is the
title of the transcript.

Context and Participants

It was referred to as primary data because this data was acquired directly
from the source. Primary data was realistic and unique. While primary data was
collected to solve a specific problem, secondary data was collected for a variety of
purposes (Herman et al., 2022).
The ways to do this study which was related to collecting the data are
reading the transcript of the speech multiple times, selecting the personal
pronouns in the transcript of the speech by underlining them, coding the personal
pronouns that have already been found. Document analysis was used to analyze
the data in this study. Document analysis was a type of qualitative research in
which documents were analyzed to provide voice and meaning to a topic under
consideration.
When evaluating data, the first stage was to examine the purpose of the
different sorts of personal pronouns employed in the speech. The theory of
personal pronouns was used to analyze the function of the kind of personal
pronouns, explaining the function in connection to the context of employing
personal pronouns, and finally making a conclusion.

181
Dian Luthfiyati, Fitria Nur Hamidah
The Power of Ukraine’s President:
Personal Pronouns on Zelensky’s Speech

FINDINGS
Personal Pronouns
Only personal pronouns that are related to exclusivity (I, me, you, they,
them) and the inclusiveness (we, us) components of the speeches were
investigated because the goal of this study is to explain how leaders manage their
connections with the audience. He, him, she, her, and it are pronouns that relate to
a unique and distinct third person and are used in everyday personal discussions;
they have no bearing on the inclusivity and exclusivity features of a political
discourse.
The findings are provided in the tables below after collecting the personal
pronouns in Zelensky's speech. The research finding of personal pronouns and
their inflections in Zelensky's speech is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Personal Pronouns in Zelensky’s Speech

Personal Pronoun Functions Count
Personal believe 5
Pledge 1
I Power 1
Experience 1
Acknowledgment 3
Refer to the people that
5
the speaker is talking to
Refer to the specific
You 5
group
Refer to people in
5
general
Inclusive 1
Refer to the speaker and
2
the audiences
Exclusive 6
Refer to the speaker,
We the people who are not
6
present but not refer to
the audiences
Refer to the speaker and
the group that the 2
speaker be part of
Table 1 demonstrated that among other personal pronouns used in the speech, the
personal pronoun we and its inflections, either inclusive or exclusive, are the most
common, followed by personal pronouns they, you, and I, and their inflections.
They have a variety of functions as well.

The Personal Pronoun “I”

The examples below showed how Zelensky uses the word "I" and its
inflections in many categories. Personal characteristics of politicians include
having principle, morality, and power, as well as not being afraid to act when
necessary.
The examples below show how Zelensky uses the personal pronoun “I” and its
inflections to show powers:

182
Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics Vol. 9, No. 2, December 2022
http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/celtic/index

(1) “I would like to thank you for those warm words, strong words of support for
our people, me personally, our state, which were heard here today, and for the
warmth with which you shelter our forcibly displaced persons.”
(2) “I am very grateful to your state, to your people for the generous help in this
struggle. The Czech Republic helped us both with weapons - very substantively and
immediately after it became necessary - and politically. I thank the leadership of
the state for that. You can be sure that you have supported yourself and your own
freedom, your own life with that.”
Example (1) demonstrated how Zelensky used his authority to address
Ukraine-related issues. In his speech, he expressed his gratitude for the warm
words of support for his people, himself, and his stated that were heard here that
day, as well as the warmth with which the audience shelters their forcibly
displaced people. They value it because it was historically significant. He expressed
his gratitude for this on behalf of all Ukrainians. As a result, Zelensky introduced
himself with "I" rather than "we".
Example (2) further demonstrated Zelensky’s ability to use his influence as
President of Ukraine to promote other countries. He was grateful to the Czech
Republic and its people for their kind assistance in this endeavor. The Czech
Republic aided them both militarily and politically and did so quickly and
effectively after the need arose. He expressed his gratitude to the state's leadership
for this. He also expressed his support for their people, saying, "You can be
confident that you have supported yourself and your own freedom, your own
existence with that." To underline his good relations with other countries, Zelensky
used I instead of we in this situation.
The Examples below are the speech that delivered by him to show his
thankfulness:
(3) “I would like to thank you for this opportunity to address both houses of the
Parliament of the Czech Republic and absolutely all Czechs in this format today.”
(4) “I would like to thank you for those warm words, strong words of support for
our people, me personally, our state, which were heard here today, and for the
warmth with which you shelter our forcibly displaced persons.”
He used the personal pronoun "I" to demonstrate his sincere admiration in
Example (4). The personal pronoun "I" was used in this example to convey that
Zelensky must thank you for the opportunity to address both houses of the Czech
Republic's Parliament as well as all Czechs. In example (5), he expressed his
gratitude by using the personal pronoun "I." In this example, the personal pronoun
"I" was used to emphasize that Zelensky must thank you for Czech’s warm words
of support for his people, him personally, and their state, which were heard here
that day, and for the warmth with which Czech presidency shelter their forcibly
displaced persons.

The Personal Pronoun “You”

The examples below showed how to utilize you to refer to other persons.
The personal pronoun could be used to refer to the people to whom the speaker
was speaking. It denoted that the speaker was speaking directly to the listener.
The sample below demonstrated how he refers to his audience as "you."
(5) I am grateful to you for this personally and on behalf of every Ukrainian.

183
Dian Luthfiyati, Fitria Nur Hamidah
The Power of Ukraine’s President:
Personal Pronouns on Zelensky’s Speech

(6) I will begin with words that each of you knows for sure and that all Europeans
who respect history and freedom on our continent know for sure.
(7) We are with you, be with us!
(8) You can be sure that you have supported yourself and your own freedom, your
own life with that.
(9) I urge you to continue together with us, without stopping for a moment, to
convince all those who have not yet managed to choose a clear side in this
confrontation, which has been going on for 112 days already, of this simple truth.
Example (5) showed that he used personal pronoun “you” to refer to people that
he is talking to. In the sentence before it, he mentioned Parliament of the Czech
Republic or this opportunity to address both houses of the Parliament of the Czech
Republic and absolutely all Czechs in this format today. Furthermore, the personal
pronoun “your” as the of you in example (6) also referred to the audiences and all
Europeans. Example (7) showed that he used personal pronoun “you” to refer to a
specific group. In the example (k), he used personal pronoun “you” to refer to
Parliament of the Czech Republic and Czechs, not to his audiences or to the people
in the general. Example (8) also shows that he used the personal pronoun “your” to
refer to people in a specific group. In this context, he was talking about the hugely
influential when they were broadcast on Czech radio in 1968, supporting the
resistance. They are also incredibly essential now, as we remember those who
battled for your people's freedom. Example (9) also showed that he used personal
pronoun yourself to refer to people in a specific group.

The Personal Pronoun “We”

The following were some examples of using personal pronoun ‘We’:
(10) We appreciate it, it's truly historical. I am grateful to you for this personally
and on behalf of every Ukrainian.
(11) We are talking about those who fought for freedom for your people.
(12) We can say that it is with these words that we, Ukrainians, address all the
peoples of Europe, all the peoples of the democratic world.
(13) We are with you, be with us!
The example (10) was the example of the used of “we” to refer to the
speaker inclusively. Example (11) showed that he used personal pronoun “we” and
its inflections to refer to Ukraine government. In his speech, the use of “we and us”
mean that him and all the member of the Ukrainians were involved and making
them also had responsibility. Therefore, the example (12) and (13) he stated that
he and all the members of the Ukrainians to share plans, proposals, visions, and
ideas.

DISCUSSION
The linguistics discipline of critical discourse analysis places a strong
emphasis on power relations and ideology in conversation (Merrita, 2021). Critical
discourse analysis (CDA) is a method that examines linguistic elements in order to
expose power in the text.
Personal pronouns “I”, “You”, and “We”, with their varied placements are
employed by Zelensky in his speech. In his speech, he used the pronoun “I” to
represent himself in a positive manner and to emphasize his personal attributes. In

184
Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics Vol. 9, No. 2, December 2022
http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/celtic/index

Zelensky's speech, the usage of personal pronouns had distinct functions in

expressing his intentions and goals. In his address, the personal pronoun “I” served
the purposes of demonstrating his powerful position as president, guarantee,
demonstrating his experiences, greeting, and demonstrating his personal trust. It
was related to Personal pronouns are a rhetorical technique (Alemi et al., 2018).
According to Lenard (2016), the objective of a politician sharing her or his
personal experience was to introduce a new bill. Instead of replacing the speaker's
name, the personal pronoun “I” was used as self-reference. The personal pronoun
"I" was used to refer to the speaker himself rather than as a replacement for the
speaker's name, (Håkansson, 2012). "I" was a personal pronoun that denoted
exclusivity (Baatenburg De Jong, n.d.)He speaker's point of view, thoughts, and
beliefs are often represented with the personal pronoun "I" (Fadzilah & Noor,
2021).
“You” was a personal pronoun that was used to mention to the individuals to
whom the speaker was speaking, a specific group, or people in general. When he
passed on the audiences, he used “you” to allude to the people he's talking to,
which in this case was all the members of the Ukrainian who were attending the
event. Understanding the co-text as provided in the speech could demonstrate this.
Furthermore, when he mentioned Czech, he used you to allude to a specific group.
This was related to (Dahnilsyah, 2017) who stated that its role was to create a
bond between the speaker and the audience.
Besides, Example (9) also showed that he used personal pronoun yourself
to refer to people in a specific group. The context of this speech was the same as in
the example (8), talking about struggle and support. “You” was to serve as
indefinite pronoun (Håkansson, 2012). It could be used to anyone or everyone.
“We” could be used to portray the idea of a political party as a team to
shared responsibilities (Håkansson, 2012). It was found in the finding of this study
that "We" was another personal pronoun he used in his discourse. The functions
were to mention to the speaker and the audience, to refer to the speaker and a
third party but not the audience, and to refer to any groups that the speaker
considers to be members of. The most crucial benefit of using we is that it allows
you to join a group. It suggested that the speaker is attempting to position himself
as the listener by utilizing inclusive. The speaker might share his responsibilities to
the audience by establishing himself as the audience. He also wants to highlight
that he bears the same level of responsibility as the entire Ukrainian.
Another study which was done by (Merrita, 2021), she also analyzed the
president’s speech or Mr. Joko Widodo’ speech. her study focused on the critical
discourse analysis and it had difference from this study because this study focused
on personal pronouns. Besides, the study which was done by (Sari, 2020), she
analyzed about turn-taking and mechanism and power relation by using
conversation analysis. It had difference from this study because this study used the
one subject, that was president and focused on personal pronoun but this study
had two subjects, those were teacher and student and focused on conversation
analysis. So this study could give personal pronouns which was used in the speech.
According to Håkansson (2012), there are two broad categories for the
discourse functions of we in political speeches: inclusive and exclusive. While the
exclusive ‘we’ refers to the speaker and the third person pronoun and places the

185
Dian Luthfiyati, Fitria Nur Hamidah
The Power of Ukraine’s President:
Personal Pronouns on Zelensky’s Speech

second person you or the direct audience into another side, the inclusive ‘we’
refers to the speaker and the second person you. The general public or American
citizens who have the ability to vote for the next president are the direct audiences
for the presidential debate. The data shows that the inclusive we is employed more
frequently than the exclusive we since both candidates wanted to win the public's
support. In such a context, personal pronouns show how the speaker or writer
communicates his or her perception to other participants in the
discourse(Romadlani, 2021).
Overall, it can be inferred from the use of personal pronouns in the
aforementioned speech transcripts that Zelensky employed techniques for
selecting a variety of personal pronouns to use in accordance with the information
being conveyed (Beard, 2000). People develop, sustain, and steer their interactions
to their receptive audience when they are communicating (Farahani & Kazemian,
2021).
According to Pradiptha et al., (2020), political discourse is a class of genres
characterized by a social domain, notably politics, rather than a genre in and of
itself. Among the genres that belong in the political arena are parliamentary
debates, political party programs, and speeches made by political leaders. People
communicate in a variety of ways depending on their beliefs, ethnicity, and
gestures, all of which affect how they use and comprehend language. This failure to
listen to and understand what the other person is saying may be a result of this
(Yulistiana, 2020).
Politics and other spoken discourse are typically provided by an effective
speaker. A multitude of advantages, including voice quality effects, face
expressions, and postural or gestural system, define effective speakers. Compared
to written speech, spoken conversation places higher demands on the speaker
(Hassan, 2016). In addition to being spontaneous, speakers should pay attention to
what they recently said and prepare their subsequent statements. Additionally,
speakers must pay attention to their interlocutors, adjust their discourse
appropriately, and keep an eye on the reactions of their listeners.
The pronouns used We also depart from Savoy (2018) in the findings in this
investigation. In the earlier research, the pronoun "we" is utilized to denote both a
sense of oneness and otherness. In this study, the pronoun "we" is employed to
generate a sense of community and shared accountability. Political speech analysis
has been acknowledged to have made a significant contribution to our
understanding of social and political realities (Setiarini et al., 2019).

CONCLUSION
In presidential address, personal pronouns served a variety of purposes. It had to
do with the speakers' agreement, point of view, intents, and goals. “I” denote a
personal level, allowing the speaker to demonstrate authority, personal
responsibility, dedication, and engagement. Pronoun “I” and its variants were used
to indicate personal evaluation and speaker's opinion based on the context, as well
as to mark as subject, possessive adjective, or object in phrases.
Like other usage of "you," "you" in a speech refers to the person to whom
the speaker was speaking, both when referring to a specific nation and when
referring to all nations. The speaker might utilize “you” to address certain

186
Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics Vol. 9, No. 2, December 2022
http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/celtic/index

members of the crowd or the entire audience. The pronoun “you” was frequently
employed to mention people other than the speaker. For example, consider
American citizens in general and campaign audiences. The politician positioned
himself/herself as being on the same side as the people that the pronoun you refer
to by utilizing the word you.
Meanwhile, the words "we" have diverse meanings and purposes depending
on whether they are inclusive or exclusive. The inclusive "we" referred to the
speaker and the entire audience to whom he was speaking, whereas the exclusive
"we" referred to the speaker and his group, which did not include the listener in
this case. When the president wanted to make a point his good personality in
leading the nation or underline his personal dedication, service to the country and
society, and supremacy, among other things, the personal pronoun "we" was
frequently used. Zelensky used “we” if he wanted to share accountability, as well as
to engage the public and generate a sense of collectivity and shared responsibility.
It might be interesting to compare and analyze the pronouns used in
politics by politicians from different countries in future studies to see if there is a
difference because there has been a lot of research on pronominal choices made by
politicians working in the same country. There should be more research on how
much of the speeches that prominent politicians give are written for them.

REFERENCES
Alemi, M., Latifi, A., & Nematzadeh, A. (2018). Persuasion in political discourse:
Barak obama’s presidential speeches against ISIS. Russian Journal of
Linguistics, 22(2), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-
2-278-291
Baatenburg De Jong, L. (n.d.). A decision we have to make together: A qualitative
analysis of inclusiveness and exclusiveness of personal pronouns as a strategic
maneuver in medical bad news conversations.
Beard, A. (2000). The language of politics. Routledge.
Bozic Lenard, D. (2016). Gender differences in the personal pronouns usage on the
corpus of congressional speeches. Journal of Research Design and Statistics in
Linguistics and Communication Science, 3(2), 161–188.
https://doi.org/10.1558/jrds.30111
Bramley, N. R. (2001). Pronouns of politics: The use of pronouns in the
construction of ‘self’ and ‘other’ in political interviews. Australian National
University, December, 1–355. Celtic,+9.+Merrita-June+2021-112-125.pdf. (n.d.).
Cordeiro, C. M. (2018). Using systemic functional linguistics as method in
identifying semogenic strategies in intercultural communication. Study of the
collocation of “time” and “different” by Swedish managers with international
management experiences. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research,
47(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2018.1455601
Dahnilsyah, D. (2017). The Implied Power through the Use of Personal Pronouns in
Obama’s Speeches: Critical Discourse Analysis. International Journal of
Educational Best Practices, 1(2), 59.
https://doi.org/10.31258/ijebp.v1n2.p59-71

187
Dian Luthfiyati, Fitria Nur Hamidah
The Power of Ukraine’s President:
Personal Pronouns on Zelensky’s Speech

Darong, H. C. (2021). Interpersonal Function of Joe Biden’s Victory Speech

(Systemic Functional Linguistics View). Journal of Education Research and
Evaluation, 5(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i1.31420
Dunn, K., Rumbach, A., & Finch, E. (2022). Language function in the acute phase
following non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: A prospective cohort
study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 96, 106192.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106192
Ekawati, R. (2016). THE USE OF PERSONAL PRONOUN AS A RHETORICAL
STRATEGY IN SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO’S PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH TEXT
AT THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY. 6.
Fania Yulistiana, & Widyastuti. (2022). ASSERTIVE ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS ON
INTERRUPTION BY JOE BIDEN IN THE 2020 FIRST PRESIDENTIAL
DEBATE. Celtic : A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature
and Linguistics, 9(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v9i1.21208
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language.
Longman.
Farahani, M. V., & Kazemian, R. (2021). Speaker-Audience Interaction in Spoken
Political Discourse: A Contrastive Parallel Corpus-Based Study of English-
Persian Translation of Metadiscourse Features in TED Talks. Corpus
Pragmatics, 5(2), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00099-z
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies
for analysis and applications (10th ed). Pearson.
Håkansson, J. (n.d.). The Use of Personal Pronouns in Political Speeches. 26.
Håkansson, J. (2012). The Use of Personal Pronouns in Political Speeches. 9–20.
Hassan, I. (2016). Critical Discourse Analysis of the Political Speech of the Egyptian
President, Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, at the New Suez Canal Inauguration
Ceremony. Egyptian Journal, 83 (26).1-38.
https://doi.org/10.21608/bfalex.2016.155235
Haris Fadzilah, N. I. E. A., & Noor, M. M. (2021). Examining the Use of Personal
Pronouns in Political Speeches by Tun Dr. Mahathir and President Trump.
International Journal of Modern Languages And Applied Linguistics, 5(4), 52.
https://doi.org/10.24191/ijmal.v5i4.15874
Herman, Purba, R., Sijabat, A. P., Saputra, N., Muhammadiah, M., & Thao, V. N.
(2022). Investigating the Realization of Speech Function in a Speech through
Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective. Script Journal, 7(1), 31–41.
Kaewrungruang, K., & Yaoharee, O. (2018). The Use of Personal Pronoun in Political
Discourse: A Case Study of the Final 2016 United States Presidential Election
Debate. 25, 12.
Mensah, E., Alexander, J., & Ayeni, Q. (2022). The ethnopragmatic functions of Owe
and Tiv personal names in Nigeria. Language Sciences, 91(May), 101474.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2022.101474
Merrita, D. (2021). NATIONALISM IDEOLOGY: CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF
JOKO WIDODO’S SPEECH IN INDONESIAN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. Celtic:
A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics,
8(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v8i1.16474

188
Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics Vol. 9, No. 2, December 2022
http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/celtic/index

Orji, R. (2016). Persuasion and culture: Individualism-collectivism and

susceptibility to influence strategies. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1582, 30–
39.
Pradiptha, W. A., Purwati, T., & Hadiati, C. (2020). Reflection of Ideology: A Critical
Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s Declaration Speech of Jerusalem as
Capital City of Israel. J-Lalite: Journal of English Studies, 1(1), 22.
https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jes.2020.1.1.2715
Romadlani, M. M. I. (2021). Personal Pronouns in American Presidential Political
Discourse. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 15.
Sari, C. C. (2020). CONVERSATION ANALYSIS: TURN-TAKING MECHANISM AND
POWER RELATION IJ CLASSROOM SETTING. Celtic: A Journal of Culture,
English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 7(2).
https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v7i2.12598
Savoy, J. (2018). Analysis of the style and the rhetoric of the 2016 US presidential
primaries. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 33(1), 143–159.
https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx007
Setiarini, N., Winarni, I., & Junining, E. (2019). Rhetorical Devices of Pronoun on
Donald Trump’s Presidential Speech “Remarks by President Trump to March
for Life Participants and Pro-Life Leaders.” Alphabet, 2(2), 62–74.
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.alphabet.2019.02.02.04
Suryaningsih, Y. (2021). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Personal Pronouns in
Greta Thunberg’s Speeches. SAGA: Journal of English Language Teaching and
Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.21460/saga.2020.21.34
Tawfiq Bataineh, M. (2019). Linguistic and Pragmatic Devices in King Abdullah’s
Speech: A Political Discourse Analysis. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics and English Literature, 8(2), 40.
https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.2p.40
Wahyuningsih, S. (2018). A Discourse Analysis Personal Pronouns in Donald
Trump’s Inauguration Speech. ELLiC Proceedings, 2, 346–350.

189