PMCF Mercilyn Utilization of Lesson Plans

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Appendix F

PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING FORM


SY 2022-2023

SIGNATURE
DATE CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT IMPACT ON JOB/ACTION PLAN
(RATER/RATEE)
During the Monitoring and Evaluation to SH on
the utilization of lesson plans using the
contextualized district tool, the following
observations were taken.

1. Some of the teachers using 4As model. Include the mastery level of the
Others also using 7Es specially the Science learner in the reflection section.
Learners’ mastery level will be determined and
subjects.
identified whose learners’ needing
2. Reflection or the mastery level of learners Follow the template as indicated
intervention/remediation or enrichment.
were not taken. This is to ensure that in the DepEd Order to ensure
learners proficiency level was determined. uniformity and always note that it
Design a lesson plan in all subjects handled to
3. Some of the teachers not using the format in is a mandate.
serve as blueprint in the teaching-learning MERCILYN B. SANGO
4/13/2023 DO 42 s. 2016. There were also teachers
delivery process. School Head, Barcelona NHS
using it. HOTS will be always present in
4. HOTS questions were evident. Before the the lesson.
Learners critically think or process questions
lesson, the teacher presented a pictures or
with regards to the topic.
priming activities for the learners to have Varied activities were given.
prior knowledge in the present lesson.
5. During the lesson, teachers giving activities
but there were activities not suited to them
(not contextualized) resulting to doubt of
taking the performance standard.
6. Short quizzes were given after introducing
the lesson

Prepared by: Noted:

MIRASOL GO TARAY, P-III FLUELLEN L. COS, PhD


PSDIC Chief, CID

You might also like