People Vs Dasmariñas
People Vs Dasmariñas
People Vs Dasmariñas
Facts:
Jerson Dasmariñas and Nino Polo were charged for the murder of PO2 Marlon Anoya.
The information averred that:
After the trial, the RTC pronounced Dasmariñas guilty of murder but acquitted Polo. The
Court of Appeals affirmed this decision hence this appeal. Dasmariñas argued that the
prosecution failed to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Issue:
Whether or not the prosecution failed to prove Petitioners guilt beyond reasonable
doubt and if the crime he was convicted with is proper
Ruling:
The appeal lacks merit but the Court held that the conviction of Dasmariñas for murder
cannot be upheld. He is properly liable only for homicide.
The mere usage of the term treachery in the information without anything more did not
suffice for such term was a conclusion of law, not a factual averment. Section 9, Rule 110 of
the 2000 Rules on Criminal Procedure requires the use of ordinary and concise language and not necessarily in the
language used in the statute but in terms sufficient to enable a person of common understanding to know what offense is being
charged as well as its qualifying and aggravating circumstances and for the court to pronounce judgment.
The accused cannot be convicted of a crime, even if duly proven, unless it is alleged or
necessarily included in the information filed against him. (People vs Manalili)
In this case, the acts constitutive of treachery were not sufficiently averred in the
information.