People Vs Dasmariñas

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

IV.

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee


vs.
JERSON DASMARINAS y GONZALES,, Accused-Appellant G.R. No. 203986
October 4, 2017

Facts: 
Jerson Dasmariñas and Nino Polo were charged for the murder of PO2 Marlon Anoya.
The information averred that:

x x x the above-named accused, conspiring and confederating together and both


of them mutually helping and aiding each other without justifiable motive, with
intent to kill and with treachery, abuse of superior strength, and evident
premeditation (sic), did then and there knowingly, unlawfully and feloniously
attack, assault and use personal violence upon one PO2 MARLON N. ANOYA, by
then and there shooting him twice on his head, thereby inflicting upon the latter
mortal wound which directly caused her (sic) death x x x.

After the trial, the RTC pronounced Dasmariñas guilty of murder but acquitted Polo. The
Court of Appeals affirmed this decision hence this appeal. Dasmariñas argued that the
prosecution failed to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Issue: 
Whether or not the prosecution failed to prove Petitioners guilt beyond reasonable
doubt and if the crime he was convicted with is proper

Ruling:
The appeal lacks merit but the Court held that the conviction of Dasmariñas for murder
cannot be upheld. He is properly liable only for homicide.

The mere usage of the term treachery in the information without anything more did not
suffice for such term was a conclusion of law, not a factual averment. Section 9, Rule 110 of
the 2000 Rules on Criminal Procedure requires the use of ordinary and concise language and not necessarily in the
language used in the statute but in terms sufficient to enable a person of common understanding to know what offense is being
charged as well as its qualifying and aggravating circumstances and for the court to pronounce judgment.

The court cited the following jurisprudence: 


No information for a crime will be sufficient if it does not accurately and clearly allege
the elements of the crime charged. Every element of the offense must be stated in the
information. What facts and circumstances are necessary to be included therein must
be determined by reference to the definitions and essentials of the specified crimes.
(People vs Dimaano) 

The accused cannot be convicted of a crime, even if duly proven, unless it is alleged or
necessarily included in the information filed against him. (People vs Manalili)

In this case, the acts constitutive of treachery were not sufficiently averred in the
information. 

You might also like