StudyGuide Unit1 200919v7 1
StudyGuide Unit1 200919v7 1
StudyGuide Unit1 200919v7 1
Contents
Context ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Outcomes and Deliverables ............................................................................................................................ 3
Weekend 1: Outline of Three-day Workshop ............................................................................................ 4
Foundations of Psychosynthesis Leadership Coaching: Key topics summary .................................... 5
Introduction to Psychosynthesis Coaching ............................................................................................................. 6
Key Elements of Psychosynthesis Psychology for Coaching .................................................................. 6
Trifocal Vision ................................................................................................................................................................. 7
Six session structure ......................................................................................................................................... 8
The Right Relations Model ........................................................................................................................................ 10
Psychosynthesis as a context for coaching ............................................................................................... 15
The GROW model and asking questions ............................................................................................................... 16
Models of coaching and models used by coaches with leaders ........................................................... 16
Coaching Process Models: e.g. GROW, CLEAR, Solution Focus .......................................................... 16
The PCL skills model (human, process and meta skills)....................................................................................... 18
Core ‘human’ coaching skills overview ....................................................................................................... 18
Core ‘process’ coaching skills overview ..................................................................................................... 19
Meta-skills for leadership coaching overview ........................................................................................... 20
ICF competences framework ........................................................................................................................ 22
Gervase Bushe and interpersonal mush ................................................................................................................. 25
Coaching skills development ..................................................................................................................................... 27
The Learning Journey ................................................................................................................................................. 28
Basic Psychosynthesis guided meditation ................................................................................................. 28
Guidelines for Skills Practice in Triads ........................................................................................................ 28
Journal keeping ................................................................................................................................................ 29
Peer coaching contracting ............................................................................................................................. 29
Introduction to Professional Coaching Practice ................................................................................................... 30
This unit provides the basic professional handrails needed to be able to practice as a leadership coach,
as we introduce the core theoretical frameworks, models and practical skills. We distinguish between (i)
the core human skills (such as listening and questioning) and (ii) process skills (such as contracting and
reviewing) that you must have in order to practice effectively, and (iii) the higher level or meta-skills that
will set you apart as a coach and enable you to work at a deeper level with your clients (such as self-
reflection and psychological mindedness).
Our learning approach is to work with what you bring into the room and to draw out learning and
knowledge from your own experience as much as possible. We provide models that help you make
sense of and build upon what you do well and know intuitively. You also quickly start practising as
coaches in triads so that you can build confidence from doing, as well as learn from observing, providing
feedback and reflecting upon practice.
4. Understanding of the core human, process and meta skills of coaching, including equivalent of
ICF core competencies
5. Enhanced core human skills of coaching, including active listening, asking powerful questions
and dynamic communication
Check-out. End 18:00 Reflection and check- Reflection and check- Check-out from the
Day 1, 17:00 Day 2, out. out. weekend
16:00 Day 3
We start by reflecting upon your previous experience of psychosynthesis and considering the key
elements of psychosynthesis psychology for coaching.
We then introduce Trifocal Vision and Right Relations as our core contextual models for
Psychosynthesis Leadership Coaching.
We also explore the larger and ever-present context of being and presence for Psychosynthesis guiding.
Guiding can take many forms including that of coaching, facilitation, counselling or therapy.
Ø Self
Ø Will
Ø Subpersonalities
What we are saying as we hold and use Trifocal Vision is that the person is a Self in potential. So there
is both (hence Bifocal) this self in potential (that which he/she aspires to be) and there is also his/her
personal/work life, as it is today, mediated through his/her personality (which is the sum total of how
this person has learned to function in the world).
This concept of Trifocal Vision enables the coach to hold both the potential of the other person as well
as the reality of how they act and behave now. The gap between the reality and the potential is often
large and is often is experienced as too hard, too difficult or painful.
How coaches manage the process of dealing with (or ‘bridging’) this gap is the core substance of
psychosynthesis coaching.
Trifocal Vision:
Context for all Psychosynthesis Coaching
The Gap
Critical to the process of bridging the bifocal gap is to help the coachee get some sense of the next
realistic and realisable step that will move her/him along the continuum from what is now towards
her/his potential. These steps need to be big enough to be challenging and small enough to be
achievable. So we see step 1, step 2, step 3 et al – each step becoming a context for the next level of
work.
The thrust of the work over time is to help the coachee develop his/her own inner skills of personal
mastery and thereby learn to manage the gap.
Trifocal Vision:
Context for all Psychosynthesis Coaching
The Gap
Thus we break down larger goals into smaller goals and steps. We also recommend that these sessions
take place at two weekly intervals, although some organisations prefer to work on a monthly cycle.
Weekly can also be appropriate sometimes for dealing with crisis but at other times will be too intense,
without enough time between sessions for the client to act in the world. You also might initially contract
for a longer period than three months, and you can continue working with a client through a number of
six session cycles according to their needs. Although the way that sessions are packaged within a
contract can obviously vary according to many situational factors, the six-session model is our
recommended starting point.
TRI-FOCAL CONTEXT
• Emergent Self
o What are the inner and outer dynamics underlying the issue/s presented?
o What is attempting to emerge or unfold through this issue/s?
o How does this issue/s fit into the context of their life experience?
• The Gap:
11. CONTRACT
In the Institute of Psychosynthesis two-year training, right relations training including a series of 2 day
intensives is a core part of the training to develop understanding of how relationships can be approached
and practiced at both interpersonal and intrapersonal levels. In developing the core psychosynthesis
skills for coaching, Psychosynthesis Coaching Limited use the Right Relations model as our foundation
for being in profound relationship with our clients.
The practice of right relations depends partly upon awareness of one’s own history and how this
influences one’s pattern of behaviour in relationship. This awareness is important in the attempt to relate
straightforwardly to this person here and now. The awareness itself can be developed and refined through
the relationship, provided we engage in this with a willingness to pay attention to our own experience
and also to what the other indicates and communicates about their experience, including particularly
their experience of us.
We can therefore begin to develop a more accurate picture of what is through attention to our inner
experience and through getting an accurate mirror from the other.
Psychosynthesis models of the personality including Subpersonalities and Body, Feelings, Mind, show
us that we develop certain ways and patterns of behaviour and relationship as a response to the other
and to the environment. These patterns both serve as we develop (because they carry the Self into the
world, protect it, give it some form of self-expression and help it to survive) and limit (because they
ultimately prevent self-expression because they are to some extent adaptations to the environment
rather than expressions of the true Self)
These patterns of behaviour and relationship developed through history and culture tend to limit the
individual’s perception of himself/herself and of the other and his/her perception of the potential for
relationship with the other. We tend to see the other through our culture and history, so that the other
becomes our object rather than a subject in their own right.
We see them as we expect them to be rather than as they are, and often we see ourselves, in the mirror
of relationship, as we expect to see ourselves rather than as the other actually sees us. We distort the
mirror because we look through history and culture.
Essentially the Right Relations model is about choosing to pay attention to the evidence provided by the
senses and acting congruently in accordance with this rather than in accordance with a range of other
By trusting the evidence of our senses rather than preconceived expectations, we truly give up control
and predictability. We control our own power and we allow the other to have theirs. In terms of
Transactional Analysis, we move into the “Adult” position relinquishing ulterior motivations and hidden
agendas. We may be resistant to do this both from the pain of giving up treasured patterns of
identification, but also in the fear of facing the personal freedom and responsibility which this implies.
The ultimate reality of true Right Relations is that beyond the limits of personality and the egoic struggle
we are all one. As the individual comes into intrapersonal relationship s/he begins to feel whole again.
As we come into real interpersonal relationships, we may begin to feel whole in the collective sense, to
know ourselves as part of something greater, in which what is known and felt deep within each self is a
resonance and reflection of what is known and felt in others –and what is known and felt at another
level beyond the personal self
Ø I may start out with the wish to achieve some goal or desire to influence the other in some way,
perhaps to motivate towards some end or maybe simply to communicate something. I am aware of
my needs and interests in doing this.
Ø I am aware that if I act in a way that that takes into account the needs and interests of the other
then they will feel acknowledged and I am more likely to get their cooperation in working towards
my goal.
Ø In this way, through awareness of myself and the other, I am more likely to find the optimum fit
between “I” and “other” whether this means the optimum fit between two people or the optimum
fit between an objective and an outcome.
Ø We are talking about the art of what is possible. However, it is important to make the distinction
between working in a way which acknowledges and genuinely respects the other because this
promotes effectiveness (and optimum fit) and working in a way which tries to control the behaviour
of the other or to manipulate it towards our own ends. Our intention to relate to the other in a way
which takes account of their needs and interests proceeds from an idea of the other as a subject in
their own right , not as an object in our world.
Ø The principle behind this is not just a moral one. There is a direct benefit to overall effectiveness if
we relate in this way. This is because treating people as objects is simply ineffective because they
are not objects and do not respond as such. We cannot apply our culturally traditional causal way
of thinking to relationships. This is because each individual is (consciously or not) motivated by and
called by an innate need to discover and express themselves as a being of initiative, integrity and
creativity. Attempts to control people inevitably cause their connection to the source of inspiration,
willingness and creativity to be cut off.
The model intends to provide a means of examining the nature of the influence between ‘I’ and Other
and very simply to explore methods for using that influence in ways which improve the potential for
cooperation and effectiveness. As an indirect consequence, there may also be unveiled and released
powerful forces which can produce unexpected degrees of harmony. Cutting through habitual patterns
of defence, prejudices, expectations, mindsets etc. may open to new levels of communication
The influence that ‘I’ has on the other is at least dependent on the degree to which I estimates Other as
subject and not as object. This is because Other will feel acknowledged and met and certain patterns of
defence and resistance which may otherwise operate more or less unconsciously in the dynamic can be
let go.
Our tendency is to make the other equal to our mindset rather than to see them as they actually are in the
Here and Now.
In this way we limit not only the other but also ourselves. We may tend to deny our own sensitivity and
our ‘darker’ side. In doing this we are denying a dimension of difference and a level of depth in ourselves
and making this unavailable to ourselves and to the other. Thus we stay relatively safe in the known and
limit relationship and creative possibilities with the other.
As we open to the Here and Now and pay attention to this, we train our awareness to include more and
more and we allow the possibility of higher levels of consciousness. Being with ‘what is’ allows sense of
Purpose to emerge as we step beyond our normal compulsion to control; it allows the mystery to unfold.
It calls in a reality that transcends ordinary knowing. It creates awareness of another level by uncovering
the immanence of spirit. As we surrender to what is, we are letting go of the ego’s need to control and
opening a door for spirit to enter. This is the meditational aspect of Right Relations - being ‘fully present’
in the ‘present’, via the breath.
Ultimately, being Here and Now means accepting full responsibility for living life as it is now, neither
limited by a vision of ourselves created in the past nor dependent upon expectations about the future.
Sensory Awareness
To stay fully in the Here and Now we need to make full use of all of our senses. There has been much
research about how much communication between people is limited by relying on the spoken word. In
fact probably less than 30% of what is received of a message is determined by the explicit verbal content.
The rest is determined by what is conveyed through the tone, posture and effect of the message sender
(their ‘expression’) and by other less tangible factors collectively attributed to the sense of ‘relationship’
– the degree to which the sender is seeking connection with the subject of the receiver, talking ‘at’ or
‘to’ him/her, and what can be described as ‘the call’. This is what may be perceived by the receiver as
the inner agenda of the message sender. This might be quite subtle and difficult to attribute to any
particular tangible factor and may be quite unconscious to the sender.
We are more able to hear the call of another when we are truly available to them and can pay attention
to them as a subject.
Congruence
Being more Here and Now and less caught by culture and history allows greater degrees of congruence.
Congruence can be defined as an apparent match between the affect and attitude of the expression and
the content of the expression itself.
Congruence releases communication to take place at a deeper level of honesty and intimacy. The
receiver of a message, experiencing the sender as authentic, feels met and valued as a subject and cam
let go of some defences, feeling freed to respond more openly from within themselves. In the context
of psychosynthesis coaching, congruence allows the possibility of meeting at the level of soul rather
than being caught in a struggle at the level of the personality.
Holding the two ‘realities’ together and managing to suspend the desire to ‘win’ may make it possible for
truth to emerge. Right Relations includes the ability to hold difference.
Attempting to see the other means attempting to see them within their frame of reference rather than
mine and seeing beyond the personality to the Self which is trying to emerge. This is the ‘I-Thou’
relationship.
Paradoxical Reality
If I ask, ‘how can be in /right relations with this person?’, I run the risk of objectifying him/her or betraying
myself. If I ask, ‘to what degree, given my interests and values and the other’s interest and values, can I
come into relationship?’ then we may ensure right relationship. While there may not by any means be
complete match between interests and values, there may yet be an intimate meeting at the level of soul
because each person is honoured as a subject in their own right.
It is a paradoxical reality that insisting upon a resolution of differences leads to increased conflict,
whereas allowing difference leads ultimately to a greater harmony.
We are first and foremost bringing Psychosynthesis Psychology as a contextual model to coaching,
although it also provides a clear methodology and a variety of models, tools and techniques. The context
is about a way of being with the coaching client, a way of perceiving the client (Trifocal Vision), a way of
relating with the client (Right Relations), and a way of guiding the client. The two models of Trifocal
Vision and Right Relations will help you develop this context, but we also need to allow space for being
and develop an awareness of presence. There are many perspectives that can inform this aspect of our
context and we will periodically touch upon these during the course. At the same time, we are holding
being as an ever-present context for our approach to coaching.
Reflective questions
Ø What was your experience of Fundamentals?
Ø What learning, ideas or models have stuck with you?
Ø What was your most important learning from Fundamentals?
Ø Have you had an experience of holding Trifocal Vision in relationship to someone you are
coaching? Does it come easily or with difficulty?
Ø What does ‘right relations’ mean to you?
Ø How would you summarise the key elements of Psychosynthesis?
Ø How might you describe Psychosynthesis to someone you were coaching?
Ø In what ways do you find that you resonate with Psychosynthesis Psychology and in what ways
do you not?
Ø In what areas in your life do you experience right relations? Where do you not? To what extent
are you in right relationship with yourself?
Ø What are the challenges of holding Trifocal Vision in relationship to people you are coaching?
Ferrucci, Piero (1982), “What We May Be: The Vision and Techniques of Psychosynthesis”
Nocelli, Petra Guggisberg (2017) ‘The Way of Psychosynthesis: A complete guide to the origins,
concepts, and the fundamental experiences, with a biography of Roberto Assagioli’
o Coaching models; e.g. contextual models; process, stage or cycle models; intervention,
analytic and navigational models, etc.
GROW
Principles of GROW
Contracting
v As well as agreeing desired outcome (as per G in GROW model) you are establishing the scope of
the coaching and the ground rules for working together
Listening
v This stage is all about actively listening to your coachee and listening with empathy to help them
to gain an understanding of their situation and personal insight.
Exploring
This stage comprises two elements:
Ø Exploring 1: Helping the coachee to understand the personal impact the situation is
having on themselves.
Ø Exploring 2: Challenging the coachee to think through possibilities for future action
in resolving the situation
Action
v At this stage you are supporting the coachee in choosing a way ahead and deciding the next step.
Review
v Finally, this is about closing the session, reinforcing ground covered, decisions made and value
added. As a coach you are also encouraging feedback from your coachee on what was helpful
about the coaching process, what was difficult and what they would like to be different in future
coaching sessions.
Reflective questions
Ø Which models of coaching have you used or found useful?
Ø How would you describe your model of coaching?
Whitmore, John (2009, 4th Ed), ‘Coaching For Performance: Growing People, Performance and
Purpose – Part 1 The Principles of Coaching
Downey, Myles (2014), ‘Effective Modern Coaching: The Principles and Art of Successful Business
Coaching’
ü Active listening
ü Powerful questioning
ü Dynamic communication
ü Right relationships
ü Engagement and
contracting
ü Creating awareness
ü Designing interventions
and actions
ü Self-reflection, as the
foundation for reflective
practice
ü Presence and being
authentic
ü Psychological mindedness
and psycho-spiritual
awareness
ü Mastery of psychological
functions, including
imagination and intuition
ü Using Self/self as an
instrument of change
Notes on meta-skills
Self-reflection
Self-reflection is the primary meta-skill, and although this may seem very basic and simple, there are
levels and depths to this simple skill which make it a meta-skill and the cornerstone to personal
development. We explore practices which support self-reflection and look at the impact the presence
or absence of self-reflection can have in people’s lives.
The systemic meta-skill builds upon all the rest and includes your ability to move appropriately between
different levels and perspectives with your client, for example between the personal and the practical,
the business and the psychological, between the past, present and future. When do you simply follow
the client’s lead and when do you intervene, challenge or shift frame? This is a really important aspect
of coaching skills that is often ignored by coach training development programmes.
2. Establishing the Coaching Agreement—Ability to understand what is required in the specific coaching
interaction and to come to agreement with the prospective and new client about the coaching process and
relationship.
1 Understands and effectively discusses with the client the guidelines and specific parameters of the
coaching relationship (e.g., logistics, fees, scheduling, inclusion of others if appropriate).
2 Reaches agreement about what is appropriate in the relationship and what is not, what is and is not
being offered, and about the client's and coach's responsibilities.
3 Determines whether there is an effective match between his/her coaching method and the needs of the
prospective client.
4. Coaching Presence—Ability to be fully conscious and create spontaneous relationship with the client,
employing a style that is open, flexible and confident.
1 Is present and flexible during the coaching process, dancing in the moment.
2 Accesses own intuition and trusts one's inner knowing—"goes with the gut."
3 Is open to not knowing and takes risks.
C. Communicating Effectively
5. Active Listening—Ability to focus completely on what the client is saying and is not saying, to understand
the meaning of what is said in the context of the client's desires, and to support client self-expression.
1 Attends to the client and the client's agenda and not to the coach's agenda for the client.
2 Hears the client's concerns, goals, values and beliefs about what is and is not possible.
3 Distinguishes between the words, the tone of voice, and the body language.
4 Summarizes, paraphrases, reiterates, and mirrors back what client has said to ensure clarity and
understanding.
5 Encourages, accepts, explores and reinforces the client's expression of feelings, perceptions, concerns,
beliefs, suggestions, etc.
6 Integrates and builds on client's ideas and suggestions.
7 "Bottom-lines" or understands the essence of the client's communication and helps the client get there
rather than engaging in long, descriptive stories.
8 Allows the client to vent or "clear" the situation without judgment or attachment in order to move on to
next steps.
6. Powerful Questioning—Ability to ask questions that reveal the information needed for maximum benefit to
the coaching relationship and the client.
1 Asks questions that reflect active listening and an understanding of the client's perspective.
2 Asks questions that evoke discovery, insight, commitment or action (e.g., those that challenge the
client's assumptions).
3 Asks open-ended questions that create greater clarity, possibility or new learning.
4 Asks questions that move the client toward what they desire, not questions that ask for the client to
justify or look backward.
7. Direct Communication—Ability to communicate effectively during coaching sessions, and to use language
that has the greatest positive impact on the client.
1 Is clear, articulate and direct in sharing and providing feedback.
2 Reframes and articulates to help the client understand from another perspective what he/she wants or is
uncertain about.
3 Clearly states coaching objectives, meeting agenda, and purpose of techniques or exercises.
4 Uses language appropriate and respectful to the client (e.g., non-sexist, non-racist, non-technical, non-
jargon).
5 Uses metaphor and analogy to help to illustrate a point or paint a verbal picture.
9. Designing Actions—Ability to create with the client opportunities for ongoing learning, during coaching and
in work/life situations, and for taking new actions that will most effectively lead to agreed-upon coaching
results.
1 Brainstorms and assists the client to define actions that will enable the client to demonstrate, practice,
and deepen new learning.
2 Helps the client to focus on and systematically explore specific concerns and opportunities that are
central to agreed-upon coaching goals.
3 Engages the client to explore alternative ideas and solutions, to evaluate options, and to make related
decisions.
4 Promotes active experimentation and self-discovery, where the client applies what has been discussed
and learned during sessions immediately afterward in his/her work or life setting.
5 Celebrates client successes and capabilities for future growth.
6 Challenges client's assumptions and perspectives to provoke new ideas and find new possibilities for
action.
7 Advocates or brings forward points of view that are aligned with client goals and, without attachment,
engages the client to consider them.
8 Helps the client "Do It Now" during the coaching session, providing immediate support.
9 Encourages stretches and challenges but also a comfortable pace of learning.
10. Planning and Goal Setting—Ability to develop and maintain an effective coaching plan with the client.
1 Consolidates collected information and establishes a coaching plan and development goals with the
client that address concerns and major areas for learning and development.
2 Creates a plan with results that are attainable, measurable, specific, and have target dates.
3 Makes plan adjustments as warranted by the coaching process and by changes in the situation.
4 Helps the client identify and access different resources for learning (e.g., books, other professionals).
5 Identifies and targets early successes that are important to the client.
11. Managing Progress and Accountability—Ability to hold attention on what is important for the client, and to
leave responsibility with the client to take action.
1 Clearly requests of the client actions that will move the client toward his/her stated goals.
2 Demonstrates follow-through by asking the client about those actions that the client committed to
during the previous session(s).
3 Acknowledges the client for what they have done, not done, learned or become aware of since the
previous coaching session(s).
4 Effectively prepares, organizes, and reviews with client information obtained during sessions.
5 Keeps the client on track between sessions by holding attention on the coaching plan and outcomes,
agreed-upon courses of action, and topics for future session(s).
6 Focuses on the coaching plan but is also open to adjusting behaviors and actions based on the coaching
process and shifts in direction during sessions.
7 Is able to move back and forth between the big picture of where the client is heading, setting a context
for what is being discussed and where the client wishes to go.
8 Promotes client's self-discipline and holds the client accountable for what they say they are going to do,
for the results of an intended action, or for a specific plan with related time frames.
9 Develops the client's ability to make decisions, address key concerns, and develop himself/herself (to
get feedback, to determine priorities and set the pace of learning, to reflect on and learn from
experiences).
10 Positively confronts the client with the fact that he/she did not take agreed-upon actions.
In this chapter I am going to give you a brief introduction to the process that is required to get out of
interpersonal mush and create interpersonal clarity. Interpersonal clarity is a description of an interaction
in which each person knows what their own experience is, what the other person’s experience is, and
the difference between them. I call the process required to achieve interpersonal clarity a learning
conversation. When this happens between people who work in the same organization, organizational
learning takes place. Taking the time every so often to have a learning conversation and clear out the
mush is essential to sustaining partnership. My hope is that from this chapter you will get a clear idea of
what I mean by interpersonal clarity and why it is so critical to partnership based teams and
organizations. Following this chapter, I will dive deeply into the skills and attitudes that are needed to
make this process possible and then I will return to the organizational learning process a second time, in
chapter 9, and look at it in more depth
As I described in the last chapter, the model of organizational learning in this book revolves around two
or more people inquiring into their experience and generating new knowledge that leads to a change in
their patterns of organizing. Patterns of organizing are the typical interactions you have at work, the way
you and others go about identifying and solving problems, dealing with conflicts, making decisions,
assessing performance, serving customers, managing stakeholders, communicating up and down the
hierarchy, budgeting, and so on. When these patterns are unproductive and/or unsatisfying we tend to
view them as manifestations of conflict. We have a “problem” with so and so. If we talked about it to
them it would just create “more conflict”. So we most often don’t. And the possibility of partnership
dwindles away.
(Full 8-page version: http://www.psychosynthesiscoaching.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/BusheLearningConversationsSum.pdf
To explore patterns of interaction between two people and improve the basis for future partnership
Method
Skills
Attitude
Completion
Reflective questions
v Reflect upon the six human skills, six process skills and six meta skills. And ask yourself:
v What are my strengths?
v What are my developmental needs?
v How can this course help with my developmental needs?
v How would I assess myself against the levels of coach development?
Ø How good a listener are you? How do you know?
Ø How good are you at asking questions that get to the core of the client’s issue or need?
Ø How much ‘interpersonal mush’ do you have in your life and relationships?
Ø Is there someone you need to have a learning conversation with?
Take your awareness inside. Get comfortable. Allow your eyes to close. Connect to your breathing…
Now connect to your body. Affirm to yourself… I experience sensations, pleasure and pain, my body
may find itself in different conditions of sickness and health, it may be rested or tired. At one level I am
this body and at another level I am not my body… gently allow yourself to dis-identify with your bodily
experience.
Connect to your feelings right now. Affirm to yourself… my feelings are constantly changing… I
experience joy, anger, sorrow, love, pain, harmony, despair, disgust…
At one level I am these feeling and at another level I am not my feeling… and gently dis-identify from
your feelings.
Connect to your thought process. Affirm to yourself… my mental life is full of movement. I experience
thoughts continuously. My thinking that I am not thinking is itself a thought. At one level I am my
thoughts and at another level I am not my thoughts…. gently dis-identify from your thoughts and breathe
into a stiller place.
Allow yourself to identify with this calm, clear space and remind yourself that I am an aware being
endowed with will. Affirm to yourself: I AM A CENTRE OF PURE SELF CONSCIOUSNESS AND OF
WILL (repeat).
Now reflect upon your experience of…. (depending upon the context). What comes up for you? What
stays with you from this experience? (allow an image, a word or a sentence to emerge from this
experience). Let go of these experiences, and in your own time, start to bring your awareness back into
the room. And when you are ready, open your eyes.
v Ask the coach for their experience and reflections on the session
v Offer your feedback and reflections, including about where you saw Self
Feedback Principles
v Positive
v Clarifying
v Reflective
v Critical
Journal keeping
What might I use a journal for?
Ø Reflections on what you are experiencing and learning during the workshops
Ø Reflections on what you are experiencing and learning between the workshops
Ø Reflections upon your professional practice in relationship to the content of the course
Ø Periodic review and sense making of your personal and professional development
Reflective questions
v What are my personal objectives for the course?
v Reflecting upon the six human skills, six process skills and six meta skills:
v What are my strengths?
v What are my developmental needs?
v How can this course help with my developmental needs?
v Where do I need to ask for help or support?
Reflective questions
v What are your needs around professional practice?