Course Material 1
Course Material 1
Course Material 1
8. Design Process
The foundation of any steel project begins with the client who has need for such a project, who is the
financier that will contact an architect in case of building structures or the Engineer directly in case of
purely engineering structure like bridges and power stations.
The role of the structural engineer who will work with other team members includes:
Planning
Design
Preparation of drawings
Preparation of tender documents
Supervision of construction
The Engineer is expected to recommend acceptance of tenders, inspects, supervises and approves
Fabrication and construction. He/she has an overall responsibility for safety and must ensure that the
consequences of failure due to accidental causes are limited in extent.
The designer’s work, is one part of the structural engineer’s work. The aim of the structural designer is to
produce the design and drawings for a safe and economical structure that fulfils its intended purpose. The
steps in the design process are as follows.
1. Conceptual design and planning. This involves selecting the most economical structural form and
materials to be used.
2. Preliminary designs are often necessary to enable comparisons to be made. Preliminary design methods
shall be discussed later.
3. Detailed design for a given type and arrangement of structure, which includes:
idealization of the structure for analysis and design;
estimation of loading;
analysis for the various load cases and combinations of loads and identification of the most severe
design actions;
design of the foundations, structural frames, elements and connections;
Preparation of the final arrangement and detail drawings.
The materials list, bill of quantities and specification covering welding, fabrication erection corrosion
protection and fire protection may then be prepared. Finally the estimates and tender documents can be
finalized for submission to contractors.
The structural designer uses his/her knowledge of structural mechanics and design, materials, geotechnical
engineering codes of practice and combines this with his/her practical experience to produce a satisfactory
design. He/she takes advice from specialists, makes use of codes, design aids, handbooks and computer
software to help him/her in making decisions and to carry out complex analysis and design calculations.
Conceptual design in the structural engineering sense is the function of choosing a suitable form or system
or framing arrangement to bring the architectural solution into being. The building layout, limits and
parameters have been determined solely by the architect. In such cases the structural engineer may not be
able to select the optimum structural solution. Ideally, conceptual design should result from a team effort,
where architect, structural engineer and service engineers contribute to the final solution. Modern
architectural practices take this multidisciplinary approach.
The architectural decisions are based on functional, aesthetic, environmental and economic considerations.
Any of these factors may control in a given case. For example, for an industrial plant it is the functional
requirement, whereas for an exhibition building it is the aesthetic aspect. Financial control is always of
paramount importance and cost over-runs lead to many legal and other problems.
Planning may be described as the practical expression of conceptual design. The various proposals must
be translated from ideas and stretches into drawings consisting of plans and elevations to show the layout,
functions and perspective views to give an impression of the finished concept. Computer drafting software
is now normally used for this task. Simulation with views possible from all directions gives great
assistance in the decision-making process. A scale model of the complete project is often made to show
clearly the finished form. The preparation and presentation of planning proposals are very important
because the final approval for a scheme often rests with non-technical people such as city officials or
financiers.
The engineer must also consider construction in any of the major materials—masonry, concrete, steel or
timber, or again some combination of these materials for his/her structures, and then make the appropriate
selection. A list of factors that need to be considered at the conceptual and planning stage would include:
1. Location of the structure and environmental conditions;
2. Site and foundation conditions;
3. Weather conditions likely during construction;
4. Availability of materials;
5. Location and reputation of fabrication industry;
6. Transport of materials and fabricated elements to site;
7. Availability and quality of labour for construction;
8. Degree of supervision needed for construction;
9. Measures needed to give protection against corrosion and fire;
10. Likelihood of damage or failure due to fatigue or brittle fracture;
11. Possibility of accidental damage;
12. Maintenance required after completion;
13. Possibility of demolition in the future.
The final decision on the form and type of structure and construction method depends on many factors and
will often be taken on grounds other than cost, though cost often remains the most important.
Preliminary designs to enable comparisons and appraisals to be made will often be necessary during the
planning stage in order to establish which of the possible structural solutions is the most economical.
Information from the site survey is essential because foundation design will affect the type of
superstructure selected as well as the overall cost.
Arrangement drawings showing the overall structural system are made for the various proposals. Then
preliminary analyses and designs are carried out to establish foundation sizes, member sizes and weights
so that costs of materials, fabrication, construction and finishes can be estimated. Fire and corrosion
protection and maintenance costs must also be considered.
However, it is often difficult to get true comparative costs and contractors are reluctant to give costs at the
planning stage.
Nowadays, design of structural elements are optimized by the use of mathematical techniques to obtain
the most economical design for a given structure.
The aim is usually to determine the topology of the structure, arrangement of floors, spacing of columns or
frames or member sizes to give the minimum weight of steel or minimum cost. Though
The design of individual elements may be optimized, e.g. plate girders or trusses. However, with optimum
designs the depths are often some 50% greater than those normally adopted and the effect of this on the
total building cost should be considered.
The aim of the design comparison is to enable the designer to ascertain the most economical solution that
meets the requirements for the given structure. All factors must be taken into consideration. A misleading
result can arise if the comparison is made on a restricted basis. Factors to be taken into account include:
1. Materials to be used;
2. Arrangement and structural system and flooring system to be adopted;
3. Fabrication and type of jointing;
4. Method of erection of the framework to be used;
5. Type of construction for floor, walls, cladding and finishes;
6. Installation of ventilating/heating plant, lifts, water supply, power etc.
7. Corrosion protection required;
8. Fire protection required;
9. Operating and maintenance costs.
Aesthetic considerations are important in many cases and the choice of design may not always be based on
cost alone. Most structures can be designed in a variety of ways. The possible alternatives that may be
used include:
1. The different methods of framing that will achieve the same structural solution;
2. Selection of spacing for frames and columns;
3. Flooring system to be used, e.g. in situ concrete, precast concrete or profile steel sheeting
4. The various methods that may be used to stabilize the building and provide resistance to horizontal
loading;
5. The different design methods that may be applied to the same structural form, e.g. simple design or
semi rigid design, or rigid design using either elastic or plastic theory.
6. Design in different materials, e.g. mild steel or high strength steels. The weight saving may be offset by
the higher cost of the stronger material.
It should be noted that often no one solution for a given structure ever appears to dominate to the
exclusion of all other alternatives. Though the rigid pinned base portal has almost entirely replaced the
truss and stanchion frame for single-bay buildings, lattice girder roofs are often used in many single-storey
multi bay buildings.
STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN
1.0 Development of Design/Design Experience
The specific aim of structural design is, for a given framing arrangement, to determine the member sizes
to support the structure’s loads. The historical basis of design was trial and error. Then with development
of mathematics and science the design theories — elastic, plastic and limit states were developed, which
permit accurate and economic designs to be made. Over the years, safe proportions for members such as
depth/thickness, height/width, span/depth etc. were determined from experience and formulated into rules.
In this way, structural forms and methods of construction such as beam-column, arch-barrel vault and
domes in stone, masonry and timber were developed, as well as cable structures using natural fibres. Very
remarkable structures from the ancient civilizations of Egypt, Greece, Rome and the cathedrals of the
middle ages survive as a tribute to the ingenuity and prowess of early professionals using this design basis.
The results of the trial-and-error method still survive in our building practices in this present generation
while experimental design method is still included in the steel code.
The design theories: Elastic, Plastic and Limit state design are discussed thus:
Note: A statically determinate structure is a structure that is stable and all unknown reactive forces can be
determined from equations of Static Equilibrium alone. While a statically indeterminate structure is one
that is stable but contains more unknown forces than available equations of Static equilibrium
The Equations of Static Equilibrium are:
ΣFx = 0
ΣFy = 0
ΣMz = 0
The limit state codes for design of structural steel now in use are BS 5950 and Eurocode 3.
BS 5950 is divided into the following nine parts:
Part 1: Code of practice for design – Rolled and welded sections.
Part 2: Specification for materials, fabrication and erection – Rolled and welded sections.
Part 3: Design in composite construction – Section 3.1: Code of practice for design of simple and
continuous composite beams.
Part 4: Code of practice for design of composite slabs with profiled steel sheeting.
Part 5: Code of practice for design of cold formed thin gauge sections.
Part 6: Code of practice for design of light gauge profiled steel sheeting.
Part 7: Specification for materials, fabrication and erection – Cold formed sections and sheeting.
Part 8: Code of practice for fire resistant design.
Part 9: Code of practice for stressed skin design.
Part 1 covers most of the material required for everyday design. Our focus in this course shall be on part 1
of BS 5950.
5.0 BS 5950 – 1 2000 Outlook
General principles
As stated earlier, BS 5950 is based on limit state philosophy. BS 5950 states in Clause 2.1.1.1
That: The aim of structural design should be to provide, with due regard to economy, a structure capable
of fulfilling its intended function and sustaining the specified loads for its intended life. The design should
facilitate safe fabrication, transport, handling and erection. It should also take account of the needs of
future maintenance, final demolition, recycling and reuse of materials.
The structure should be designed to behave as a one three-dimensional entity. The layout of its constituent
parts, such as foundations, steelwork, joints and other structural components should constitute a robust and
stable structure under normal loading to ensure that, in the event of misuse or accident, damage will not be
disproportionate to the cause.
The aim of structural design is to provide with due regard to economy a structure capable of fulfilling its
intended function and sustaining the design loads for its intended life.
Methods of Design:
The design of steel structures may be made to any of the following methods set out in Clause 2.1.2 of BS
5950:
simple design
Rigid or Continuous design;
Semi rigid or Semi-continuous design;
Experimental verification.
In choosing a method, the clause states that: the details of members and connections should be such as to
realize the assumptions made in design without adversely affecting other parts of the structure.
1. Simple design.
The structure is regarded as having pinned joints, and significant moments that can adversely affect the
member or structure are not developed at connections. The structure is analysed, assuming that it is
statically determinate with pinned joints and is prevented from becoming a mechanism. In a multistorey
beam-column frame, bracing or shear walls acting with floor slabs are necessary to provide stability and
resistance to horizontal loading. This apparently conservative assumption is a very popular method of
design.
2. Continuous design.
The joints in the structure are assumed to be able to fully transfer the forces and moments in the members
which they attach. Analysis of the structure may be by elastic or plastic methods, and will be more
complex than simple design. However the increasing use of micro-computers has made this method more
viable. In theory a more economic design can be achieved by this method, but unless the joints are truly
rigid the analysis will give an upper bound (unsafe) solution.
Either elastic or plastic analysis may be used.
For elastic analysis the joints should have sufficient rotational stiffness to justify analysis based on full
continuity. The joints should also be capable of resisting the moments and forces resulting from the
analysis.
For plastic analysis the joints should have sufficient moment capacity to justify analysis assuming plastic
hinges in the members. The joints should also have sufficient rotational stiffness for in-plane stability.
4. Experimental verification
The code states that: Where design of a structure or element by calculation in accordance with any of the
preceding methods is not practicable, or is inappropriate, the strength, stability, stiffness and deformation
capacity may be confirmed by appropriate loading tests in accordance with Section 7 of the code.
Load Combinations
Clause 2.4.1.2 Buildings without cranes
In the design of buildings not subject to loads from cranes, the following principal combinations of loads
Should be taken into account:
— Load combination 1: Dead load and imposed load (gravity loads);
— Load combination 2: Dead load and wind load;
— Load combination 3: Dead load, imposed load and wind load.
In BS 5950 no distinction is made between characteristic and design strength. In effect the material
safety factor γm = 1.0. Structural steel used in the UK is specified by BS 5950: Part 2, and strengths
of the more commonly used steels are given in Table 9 of BS 5950. As a result of the residual stresses
locked into the metal during the rolling process, the thicker the material, the lower the design strength.
BS 5950 covers the design of structures fabricated from structural steels conforming to the grades
and product standards specified in BS 5950 -2. If other steels are used, due allowance should be made for
variations in properties, including ductility and weldability.