Lse Asl 2018
Lse Asl 2018
Strategic Report
Investment Objective 1
Financial Highlights 1
Chairman’s Statement 2
Investment Policy and Strategy 4
Principal Risks and Viability Statement 5
Key Performance Indicators 6
Managers’ Report 8
Thirty Largest Investments 13
Investment Portfolio 14
Portfolio Information 17
Governance Report
Board of Directors 18
Directors’ Report 19
Corporate Governance Report 23
Audit Committee Report 27
Directors’ Remuneration Policy 30
Directors’ Remuneration Report 31
Directors’ Responsibility Statement 33
Financial Report
Independent Auditor’s Report 34
Income Statement 40
Reconciliation of Movements in Shareholders’ Funds 41
Balance Sheet 42
Cash Flow Statement 43
Notes to the Financial Statements 44
THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in any doubt about the action
you should take, you are recommended to seek your own independent financial advice from your stockbroker, bank
manager, solicitor, accountant or other independent financial adviser authorised under the Financial Services and Markets
Act 2000 if you are in the United Kingdom or, if not, from another appropriately authorised financial adviser. If you have
sold or otherwise transferred all your ordinary shares in Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc, please forward this
document, together with the accompanying documents, immediately to the purchaser or transferee, or to the stockbroker,
bank or agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected for transmission to the purchaser or transferee.
Investment Objective
The investment objective of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc (ASCoT) is to achieve a net asset value total return
(with dividends reinvested) greater than that of the Numis Smaller Companies Index (excluding Investment Companies)
(NSCI (XIC) or benchmark) over the long term.
The Company has appointed Aberforth Partners LLP as the investment managers. Further information can be found on
page 19.
Financial Highlights
31 December 31 December %
2018 2017 Change
110
105
100
95
90
85
80
Dec-17 Mar-18 Jun-18 Sep-18 Dec-18
NAV Benchmark Share Price
Board changes
I have informed my colleagues of my decision not to stand for re-election at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
Initially appointed as a Director of the Company on 30 January 2013, and subsequently Chairman on 17 October 2014, it
has been my privilege to serve the Shareholders of the Company. My Board colleagues are a great team guiding the
direction of the Company and I have enjoyed working with them throughout this time. My replacement will further
strengthen the Board. I would like also to record my admiration for the partners and staff of Aberforth. Their focus and
depth of understanding is admirable in a world where so often asset gathering is prioritised over serving the needs of
customers. This is never an issue with Aberforth and I am confident this will remain the case.
We are delighted to appoint Richard Davidson as a Director with effect from 26 January 2019. It is intended that he will
become Chairman following the closure of the Annual General Meeting on 28 February 2019. Richard brings a wealth of
knowledge of the investment world and is looking forward to working with both his new Board colleagues and the
Managers. An independent board of directors is undoubtedly one of the principal advantages and differentiators of
investment trusts in the broader UK savings industry.
Dividends
The Board remains committed to a progressive dividend policy. In this context, the Board is pleased to propose a final
ordinary dividend of 20.75p. Total ordinary dividends of 30.25p for 2018 represent a 5.0% increment when compared with
2017.
Since 2015, alongside the ordinary dividend declared, the Company has also paid a special dividend, thereby ensuring that
the all-important minimum retention test imposed by HMRC is not breached. The Board adopted such a strategy to avoid
the pitfalls of allowing non-recurring revenue streams to become embedded into the progressive dividend policy, a
particular risk given the greater prevalence of special dividends and non-recurring distributions since the financial crisis.
In 2018, the Company was once again a beneficiary of special dividends and the Board has declared a special dividend of
7.75p per share alongside the total ordinary dividend of 30.25p to ensure the retention test is met.
After adjusting for both the final ordinary and special dividends, the Company’s revenue reserves will be 68.8p per share,
circa 2.3x the ordinary dividend. Strengthened revenue reserves, and prudent management of the non-recurring revenue
streams of recent years, leave the Board optimistic about the sustainability of the progressive dividend policy. As
highlighted in last year’s Chairman’s Statement, the ambition behind this strategy, and perhaps its acid test, will be for the
Board to deliver dividend growth through the next downturn. Dividend growth from small UK quoted companies has been
exceptionally strong since the global financial crisis. There was further progress in 2018, though the overall experience
was more mixed than in previous years.
I would reiterate my comments from previous years that the base level for the Company’s progressive dividend policy is
the ordinary dividend, i.e. 30.25p which excludes the special dividend.
Gearing
It has been the Company’s policy to use gearing in a tactical manner throughout its 28 year history. The £125m facility
with The Royal Bank of Scotland International has a term expiring in June 2020. As has been the case in the past, the
facility term dovetails with the three-yearly continuation vote cycle. The facility continues to provide the Company with
access to liquidity for investment purposes and to fund share buy-backs as and when appropriate. In an illiquid, and at
times volatile, asset class such as small UK quoted companies, having access to immediate funds through a credit facility
provides the Managers with enhanced flexibility. During the year, the level of gearing ranged from nil to 2.8%, with an
average of 0.8%, and at the year end gearing stood at 1.3% of Total Shareholders’ Funds.
Outlook
Throughout my tenure as Chairman, politics has cast a somewhat dark shadow. Two referendums, two general elections
and the rise of populism globally have contributed to a challenging investment environment. Brexit negotiations are
currently centre stage. The difficulties in reconciling a narrow referendum outcome, which would seem to be at odds
with the majority in the Houses of Parliament, should not be underestimated, although it is perhaps the transition from
quantitative easing to quantitative tightening that will have more lasting impact on the investment world.
Amidst all this uncertainty, the asset class is getting cheaper! In October 2014, when I became Chairman, the NSCI (XIC)
sold on a historic price/earnings multiple of 14.1x and yield of 2.5%. As at 1 January 2019, it is selling on a 10.9x p/e
multiple and yielding 3.6%. As value investors, the Managers, unsurprisingly, oversee a portfolio that is selling at a lower
p/e multiple of 9.6x and a yield of 3.7%.
The coming year will undoubtedly bring an array of surprises. However, after a tough 2018, the Board looks forward with
a degree of optimism, which is based upon the attractive valuations and the consistency of approach and professionalism
of the Managers.
Finally, the Board very much welcomes the views of Shareholders and we are available to talk to you directly. My email
address is noted below.
Paul Trickett
Chairman
25 January 2019
[email protected]
Investment Policy
The Company aims to achieve its objective by investing in small UK quoted companies. These are companies with a
market capitalisation, at time of purchase, equal to or lower than that of the largest company in the bottom 10% of the
main UK equity market or companies in the NSCI (XIC). At 1 January 2019 (the date of the last annual index rebalancing),
the index included 359 companies, with an aggregate market capitalisation of £140 billion. Its upper market
capitalisation limit was £1.3 billion, although this limit changes owing to movements in the stockmarket. If any holding
no longer falls within this definition of a small company, its securities become candidates for sale.
Portfolio risk is spread by diversification of holdings in individual companies: the portfolio will usually have holdings in
over 80 small UK quoted companies. The Company may, at time of purchase, invest up to 15% of its assets in any one
security. However, in practice, each investment will typically be substantially less and, at market value, represent less
than 5% of the portfolio on an on-going basis.
The Company’s policy towards companies quoted on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) generally precludes
investment, except either where an investee company moves from the “Main Market” to AIM (so as to avoid being a
forced seller) or where a company quoted on AIM has committed to move from AIM to the “Main Market” (so as to
enable investment before a full listing is obtained). The Company does not invest in any unquoted companies. Neither
does the Company invest in securities issued by other UK listed closed-ended investment funds except where they are
eligible to be included in the NSCI (XIC). In any event, the Company invests no more than 15% of total assets in other
listed closed-ended investment funds.
The Managers aim to keep the Company near fully invested in equities at all times and there is normally no attempt to
engage in market timing by holding high levels of liquidity. The Company may employ gearing. The Board, in conjunction
with the Managers, is responsible for determining the parameters for gearing. When considered appropriate, gearing is
used tactically in order to enhance returns.
The Board believes that small UK quoted companies continue to provide opportunities for positive total returns over the
long term. Any material changes to the Company’s investment objective and policy will be subject to Shareholder
approval.
Investment Strategy
The Managers adhere to a value investment philosophy. In practice, this approach utilises several valuation metrics,
recognising that flexibility is required when assessing businesses in different industries and that buyers of these
businesses may include other corporates as well as stockmarket investors. As a result of this philosophy, the Company’s
holdings are usually on more attractive valuations than the average for the NSCI (XIC). While there is good evidence that
a value approach within small UK quoted companies results in superior returns over the long term, there can be
extended periods when the value style is out of favour.
The Managers select companies for the portfolio on the basis of fundamental or “bottom-up” analysis. Analysis involves
scrutiny of businesses’ financial statements and assessment of their market positions. An important part of the process
is regular engagement with board members of prospective and existing investments. Holdings are sold typically when
their valuations reach targets determined by the Managers.
In order to improve the odds of achieving the investment objective, the Managers believe that the portfolio must be
adequately differentiated from the benchmark index. Therefore, within the diversification parameters described in
Investment Policy, the Managers regularly review the level of differentiation, with the aim of maximising the active share
of the portfolio.
Dividend Policy
The Board confirms its commitment to a policy of progressive dividends. In addition, in order to qualify as an investment
trust, the Company must not retain more than 15% of its income from any financial year. The Company pays an interim
dividend in August each year based on the forecast net revenue position for the current financial year. A final dividend,
subject to shareholder approval, is then paid in March each year based on the actual net income for the financial year
just ended and the future earnings forecasts.
Viability Statement
The Directors have assessed the viability of the Company over the five years to December 2023, taking account of the
Company’s position, its investment strategy, and the potential impact of the relevant principal risks detailed above.
Based on this assessment, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company will meet its liabilities as they
fall due and be able to continue in operation, notwithstanding that the Company's shareholders are to vote on the
continuation of the Company in 2020.
In making this assessment, the Directors took comfort from the results of a series of stress tests that considered the
impact of a number of severe market downturn scenarios on the Company’s financial position and, in particular, its
ability to settle projected liabilities of the Company as they fall due. The Company invests in companies listed and traded
on the London Stock Exchange. These shares are actively traded and, whilst less liquid than larger quoted companies, the
portfolio is well diversified by both numbers of holdings and industry sector. The Directors determined that a five year
period to December 2023 is an appropriate period for which to provide this statement given the Company’s long term
investment objective, the simplicity of the business model, the resilience demonstrated by the stress testing and the
relatively low working capital requirements.
Annualised Cumulative
Returns (%) Returns (%)
Share Share
Periods to 31 December 2018 NAV Index Price NAV Index Price
2 years from 31 December 2016 1.6 0.6 4.0 3.2 1.2 8.2
3 years from 31 December 2015 3.0 4.0 1.2 9.2 12.4 3.6
4 years from 31 December 2014 4.7 5.6 4.2 20.4 24.3 18.0
5 years from 31 December 2013 3.6 4.1 3.4 19.6 22.0 18.1
6 years from 31 December 2012 10.5 8.9 11.4 82.2 67.0 91.3
7 years from 31 December 2011 13.3 11.7 15.6 140.2 117.0 175.2
8 years from 31 December 2010 9.6 8.9 10.6 107.9 97.2 124.4
9 years from 31 December 2009 11.4 10.9 11.9 163.2 153.4 175.5
10 years from 31 December 2008 14.3 15.1 15.9 280.0 307.3 338.8
15 years from 31 December 2003 10.0 10.3 10.3 317.3 336.2 335.3
20 years from 31 December 1998 12.0 9.9 12.8 862.8 557.8 1,007.0
28.1 years from inception
on 10 December 1990 12.7 10.4 12.4 2,772.3 1,498.7 2,525.7
600 125
120
500
115
400 110
105
300
100
200 95
90
100
85
0 80
09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
NAV Benchmark Share Price NAV v Benchmark Share Price v Benchmark
170 5%
160 Premium
0%
Discount
150
5%
140
130 10%
120
15%
110
20%
100
90 25%
09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
RPI Dividends (excluding special dividends) Premium/Discount of Share Price to NAV
Brexit survey
To gain a different perspective on the ubiquitous Brexit debate, in September the Managers undertook a survey of the
93 companies held within Aberforth funds. The questions focused on the companies’ reactions to the referendum and on
potential future actions. The response rate was 94%, which represents a useful cross-section of the small cap universe.
The overall impression was of frustration with the politics, the Brexit process and lingering uncertainty. The lengthiest
and most detailed responses tended to come from businesses oriented towards the domestic economy. This is
unsurprising, though to an extent reassuring, since it is these companies that have been most affected by the decision
to leave the EU. The survey identified three principal areas of concern.
• Employment: executives are worried about the availability of relatively cheap and skilful labour from the EU against
the background of the rising national living wage.
• Sterling: there is an overwhelming assumption that sterling would weaken further in the event of a hard Brexit, which
would be to the disadvantage of domestic businesses but to the benefit of overseas-oriented businesses.
• Supply chain: there is concern that a deal-less Brexit would complicate the movement of goods into and out of the
UK at least in the short term. Contingency planning for several companies involves pre-emptive inventory building
ahead of March.
The results of the survey need to be considered in the context of the continuing uncertainty about the Brexit process and
outcome: company executives are having to operate with limited information and little guidance to date from
Investment performance
To recap, the NSCI (XIC)’s total return in 2018 was -15.3%, while ASCoT’s NAV total return was -15.4%. Clearly, the most
significant influence on ASCoT’s performance was the weak returns from equities in general. Beginning with the table
below, the following section analyses the other important influences in 2018.
For the 12 months ended 31 December 2018 Basis points
Stock selection -46
Sector selection 89
Attributable to the portfolio of investments, based on mid prices 43
(after transaction costs of 22 basis points)
Movement in mid to bid price spread 2
Cash/gearing -9
Purchase of ordinary shares 30
Management fee -70
Other expenses -5
Total attribution based on bid prices -9
Note: 100 basis points = 1%. Total Attribution is the difference between the total return of the NAV and the Benchmark Index (i.e. NAV = -15.44%;
Benchmark Index = -15.35%; difference is -0.09% being -9 basis points).
Sectors
The overhang of Brexit means that sector exposure has been an unusually large influence on the performance of ASCoT
and of small caps in general since the referendum. The following comments on sectors are not made with reference to
the NSCI (XIC)’s forty or so industrial classifications that determine the “Sector selection” data in the table above. Rather,
sector exposure here refers to two distinct groups of companies: those that derive a majority of their sales from the
domestic economy and those more dependent on overseas markets. The fortunes of these two groups have diverged
substantially since the referendum, with the domestics under-performing the overseas earners by 24%. This reflects
different profit dynamics under the influence of sterling weakness. The overseas companies have seen their sterling
profits rise as income streams earned in euros or dollars have been translated into pounds. In contrast, the domestics
have had to deal with insipid consumer spending and a hit to gross margins as foreign currency input costs have risen in
sterling terms.
The table below sets out the geographical exposures of the portfolio and of the benchmark. These are calculated by
reference to the sales of the underlying companies. In comparison with the NSCI (XIC), ASCoT was well positioned for
what followed the referendum and relative performance benefited accordingly. However, the extent of the under-
performance by the domestics is such that their valuations have become increasingly attractive. Consistent with the
Managers’ value investment discipline and as part of the usual bottom-up stock selection process, this resulted in capital
within ASCoT’s portfolio gradually moving from overseas to domestic businesses. It is worth noting, though, that the
pervasive market weakness of the fourth quarter has levelled the playing field somewhat: there are opportunities in all
parts of the stockmarket.
ASCoT NSCI (XIC)
Overseas Domestic Overseas Domestic
End 2018 38% 62% 42% 58%
End 2016 47% 53% 41% 59%
Balance sheets
To generalise, the boards of companies within the NSCI (XIC) reacted to the financial crisis by conserving cash to
strengthen their balance sheets. This was an understandable reaction to what they had endured in 2008 and 2009. In
more recent years, there have been signs of a return to more normal levels of confidence, with unusually strong balance
sheets put to work in the form of greater investment, acquisitions or returns of cash to shareholders. Assuming that
investment propositions have been well judged, the Managers welcome this development, but there is the risk that
balance sheets become over-stretched as happened in the years before the crisis. This would not yet appear to be the
case, as shown in the table below, which sets out the distribution of the portfolio and of the NSCI (XIC) by balance sheet
strength of the underlying companies.
Net debt/EBITDA Net debt/EBITDA
Based on 2019 estimates Net cash < 2x > 2x Loss makers
ASCoT 21% 52% 27% 0%
NSCI (XIC) 27% 38% 28% 7%
As 2018 progressed, there were indications that banks have become choosier in their lending and that credit conditions
are becoming less easy, with the retail and construction sectors appearing to be under particular pressure. It is too early
to determine whether this is simply a consequence of Carillion’s failure or if the lenders are girding themselves in the
run-up to the departure from the EU.
Income
Dividend growth has been one of the most positive features of the small cap universe in recent years. Between 2012
and 2017, annual growth from the NSCI (XIC) averaged 9%, adjusted for inflation, well above the 62 year average rate of
3%. History dictates that a slowdown is inevitable and there are indications that it may have started in 2018. It is
tempting once again to identify Brexit concerns as an influence. However, such a theme is not explicit in companies’
results statements and the deceleration would appear to be a function of one-off cuts and fewer special dividends.
Clearly, though, this might change in the event of a hard Brexit.
Turning to the portfolio’s dividend experience, the table below splits holdings into categories that are determined by
each company’s most recent dividend announcement, excluding specials. Notwithstanding the previous comments
about small cap dividends in general, the message from the table is similar to that of recent years: a handful of dividend
cutters, the persistence of several nil payers and a bias to companies that most recently increased their dividends. As a
reminder, the “Other” category includes companies that have returned to the dividend register or that have paid
dividends for the first time and that therefore do not have a meaningful comparative payment in the previous year.
While the outlook for ASCoT’s dividends will be substantially influenced by the fortunes of smaller companies in general,
the balance sheet picture described above and average portfolio dividend cover of 2.9x continue to offer support.
Down Nil payers No change Increase Other
7 18 24 28 4
Corporate activity
Against a backdrop of buoyant M&A activity around the world, Brexit concerns contributed to a quieter period for
corporate activity within the NSCI (XIC). Only 14 bids for NSCI (XIC) constituents were completed or were outstanding at
the end of the year, down from 17 in 2017 and from 33 two years before that. Of the 14, ASCoT held three, one of which
was announced towards the end of 2017. Overall, M&A dragged on ASCoT’s relative returns in 2018.
Turnover
Portfolio turnover was 26% in 2018. This compares with 22% in 2017 and with a long term average of 35%. As usual, an
element of the 26% was driven by situations in which ASCoT is effectively a forced seller, such as when a holding is taken
over or is deemed too large to remain in the NSCI (XIC). Excluding such situations, the underlying rate of turnover was
low at 14% in 2018, which is below the long term average on this basis of 23%. Underlying turnover tends to be
influenced by investment performance: if the stockmarket chooses not to re-rate ASCoT’s holdings, there is not the
scope to rotate capital into cheaper companies and so turnover is low. Conversely, better relative performance tends to
be associated with a pick-up in turnover.
Active share
Active share is a measure of how different a portfolio is from an index. It is calculated as half of the sum of the absolute
differences between each stock’s weighting in an index and its weighting in the portfolio. A higher active share would
indicate that a portfolio has a better chance of performing differently from the index, for better or worse. The Managers
target a ratio of at least 70% for ASCoT in relation to the NSCI (XIC) and at the start of January 2019 the ratio was 77%.
Active share can be flattered by holding companies that are not constituents of the comparable index. The Managers
believe that it is important for investors to know in what part of the stockmarket ASCoT is invested and accordingly there
are limited circumstances in which the portfolio can hold companies that are not in the NSCI (XIC). At the start of January
2019, all of the portfolio value was represented by constituents of the index.
Valuations
There is no shortage of data to suggest that sterling assets are particularly unloved at present. Anxiety has intensified
as Brexit enters, presumably, its final phase. The bias of small companies to the domestic economy renders them
particularly vulnerable to a badly handled departure. As the table below shows, this has been reflected in a sharp de-
rating of the asset class, with the historical PEs of both the NSCI (XIC) and the portfolio dropping sharply through 2018.
At 10.9x, the PE of the index is 19% below its average since 1990. The only two occasions in which the multiple has been
lower for a sustained period of time have coincided with recession, specifically in the early 1990s and during the financial
crisis.
31 December 2018 31 December 2017
Portfolio Characteristics ASCoT NSCI (XIC) ASCoT NSCI (XIC)
The table below provides forward-looking valuation data using the Managers’ favoured metric of enterprise value to
earnings before interest, tax and amortisation (EV/EBITA). Ratios are shown for the portfolio, the tracked universe and
certain subdivisions of the tracked universe. The tracked universe refers to the 284 companies that the Managers follow
closely and that account for 97% by value of the entire NSCI (XIC).
EV/EBITA 2018 2019 2020
ASCoT 9.7x 8.3x 7.5x
Tracked universe (284 stocks) 10.5x 9.6x 8.5x
- 49 growth stocks 16.5x 14.7x 13.2x
- 235 other stocks 9.7x 8.8x 7.9x
The table demonstrates the valuation advantage enjoyed by the portfolio, which has been a constant feature of ASCoT’s
portfolio over its 28 years and is a function of the Managers’ value investment philosophy. Underlying that valuation
advantage are three particular features of today’s universe of small UK quoted companies.
Value % of Total
No. Company £’000 Net Assets Business Activity
Other Information
Company Status
The Company is a closed-ended investment trust listed on the London Stock Exchange and an Alternative
Investment Fund under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFM) Directive. The Company has been
approved by HM Revenue & Customs as an investment trust for accounting periods commencing on or after
1 January 2013 subject to the Company continuing to meet the eligibility conditions. The Company will continue to
conduct its affairs as an investment trust. Furthermore, the Company is an investment company as defined within
the meaning of Section 833 of the Companies Act 2006.
Board Diversity
The Board recognises the importance of diversity in its broadest sense (including skills, experience, gender and tenure)
in enabling it to fulfil the present and future needs of the Company. As at 31 December 2018, there were three male
directors and two female directors.
Paul Trickett,
Chairman
Julia Le Blan
Appointed: 29 January 2014 and chairs the Audit Committee
Shareholding in the Company: 3,000 Ordinary Shares
Julia is a chartered accountant and has worked in the financial services industry for over 30 years. She was formerly a tax
partner at Deloitte and expert on the taxation of investment trust companies. She sat for two terms on the AIC’s
technical committee and is also a director of The Biotech Growth Trust plc, BMO UK High Income Trust plc, Impax
Environmental Markets plc and JP Morgan US Smaller Companies Investment Trust plc.
Paula Hay-Plumb
Appointed: 29 January 2014 and is a member of the Audit Committee
Shareholding in the Company: 2,100 Ordinary Shares
Paula is a chartered accountant and an experienced director with a wealth of finance and governance expertise in both
the private and public sectors. Her previous roles include Corporate Finance and Group Reporting Director at Marks and
Spencer plc, Chairman of the National Australia Group Common Investment Fund and non-executive board member of
Skipton Building Society and the National Audit Office. Paula is currently a non-executive board member of The Crown
Estate, Hyde Housing Association and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and a Trustee of Calthorpe
Estates.
Richard Rae
Appointed: 26 January 2012 and is a member of the Audit Committee
Shareholding in the Company: 4,000 Ordinary Shares
Richard qualified as a chartered accountant with KPMG and joined Hoare Govett as an investment analyst in 1987. He
spent 22 years working in investment research and equities management, latterly as a Managing Director, responsible
for smaller companies, in the Global Equities division of ABN AMRO. Since 2009, he has established himself as an
independent management consultant providing corporate advice to both listed and unlisted companies. He is also a
director of Maistro plc.
Martin Warner
Appointed: 1 March 2018
Shareholding in the Company: 1,000 Ordinary Shares
Martin co-founded Michelmersh Brick Holdings plc in 1997 and served as Chief Executive and subsequently non-
executive Chairman from May 2017. Martin is a Fellow of the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors and is Chairman of
the Brick Development Association.
Richard Davidson
Appointed: with effect from 26 January 2019
Shareholding in the Company: n/a
Richard is currently Chair of Miton Global Opportunities plc. He is also Chair of the University of Edinburgh’s Investment
Committee as well as being a Trustee of its pension scheme. Formerly, he was a Partner and Manager of the Macro Fund
at Lansdowne Partners. Prior to that, he was a Managing Director and No.1 ranked investment strategist at Morgan
Stanley, where he worked for 15 years. Since 2003, Richard has also been heavily involved in forestry investment and
management.
Directors
The Directors of the Company during the financial year are listed on page 31. Further information about the Board can
be found in the Corporate Governance Report, which forms part of this Directors’ Report.
It is the responsibility of the Board to ensure that there is effective stewardship of the Company’s affairs. In common
with the majority of investment trusts, the Company has neither executive directors nor any employees. However, the
Board has engaged external firms to undertake the investment management, secretarial, depositary and custodial
activities of the Company.
Investment Managers
Aberforth Partners LLP (the firm, Managers or Aberforth) act as Alternative Investment Fund Manager and Secretaries
to the Company. The business was established in 1990 to provide institutional and wholesale investors with a high level
of resources focused exclusively on small UK quoted companies. Since then funds under management have grown to
£2.0 billion (as at 31 December 2018). The firm is wholly owned by seven partners, six of whom are investment
managers. The investment managers work as a team managing the Company’s portfolio on a collegiate basis.
These services can be terminated by either party at any time by giving six months’ notice of termination. Compensation
would be payable in respect of this six month period only if termination were to occur sooner. Aberforth receives an
annual management fee, payable quarterly in advance, equal to 0.75% of the net assets up to £1 billion, and 0.65%
thereafter. The management fee amounted to £10,072,000 in the year ended 31 December 2018 (2017: £9,641,000).
The secretarial fee amounted to £84,862 (excluding VAT) during 2018 (2017: £81,692, excluding VAT). It is adjusted
annually in line with the Retail Prices Index and is subject to VAT, which is currently irrecoverable by the Company.
The Board reviews the Company’s investment management and secretarial arrangements on an on-going basis and
formally at its October meeting, where each Director completes a Managers’ Evaluation questionnaire. The Board then
considers the results of the questionnaire and discusses the following matters, amongst others, in its review:
• investment performance in relation to the investment objective, policy and strategy;
• the continuity and quality of personnel managing the assets;
• the level of the management fee;
• the quality of reporting to the Board;
• the alignment of interests between the Managers and the Company’s Shareholders;
• the administrative services provided by the Secretaries; and
• the level of satisfaction of major Shareholders with the Managers.
Following the most recent review, the Board was of the opinion that the continued appointment of Aberforth as
investment managers, on the terms agreed, remains in the best interests of Shareholders.
Going Concern
The Audit Committee has undertaken and documented an assessment of whether the Company is a going concern. The
Committee reported the results of its assessment to the Board.
The Company’s business activities, capital structure and borrowing facility, together with the factors likely to affect its
development and performance are set out in the Strategic Report. In addition, the Annual Report includes the Company’s
objectives, policies and processes for managing its capital and financial risk, along with details of its financial instruments
and its exposures to credit risk and liquidity risk. The Company’s assets comprise mainly readily realisable equity
securities, which, if necessary, can be sold to meet any funding requirements, though funding flexibility can typically be
achieved through the use of the bank debt facility. The Company has adequate financial resources to enable it to meet
its day-to-day working capital requirements.
In summary and taking into consideration all available information, the Directors have concluded it is appropriate to
continue to prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis.
Directors’ Recommendation
The Directors consider each resolution being proposed at the AGM to be in the best interests of Shareholders as a whole
and they unanimously recommend that all Shareholders vote in favour of them, as they intend to do so in respect of their
own beneficial shareholdings.
Independent Auditor
Deloitte LLP has expressed its willingness to continue in office as auditor and a resolution proposing their re-appointment
will be put to the forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
Future Developments
The future success of the Company is dependent primarily on the performance of its investments. Although the Company
invests in companies that are listed or quoted in the United Kingdom, the underlying businesses of those companies are
affected by various economic factors, many of an international nature. The Board’s intention is that the Company will
continue to pursue its investment objective and the stated investment strategy and policy.
Compliance
Throughout the year ended 31 December 2018 the Company complied with the recommendations of the AIC Code
except, as explained below, where the Company does not believe it appropriate to comply.
The Board, being small in size and composed entirely of independent non-executive Directors, has not appointed a
Remuneration or a Nomination Committee. Directors’ fees and the appointment of new Directors are considered by the
Board as a whole. The Board has also decided not to nominate a Deputy Chairman or a Senior Independent Director,
although the Chair of the Audit Committee fulfils this role when necessary, for example in taking the lead in the annual
evaluation of the Chairman.
The UK Corporate Governance Code includes provisions relating to the role of the chief executive, executive Directors’
remuneration and the need for an internal audit function. For reasons set out in the AIC Guide, the Board considers these
provisions are not relevant to the Company as it is an externally managed investment company. In particular, all of the
Company’s day-to-day management and administrative functions are outsourced to third parties. As a result, the
Company has no executive Directors, employees or internal operations. The Company has therefore not reported further
in respect of these provisions.
The Board
The Board is responsible for the effective stewardship of the Company’s affairs. Strategic issues and all operational
matters of a material nature are considered at its meetings. At 31 December 2018, the Board comprised five non-
executive Directors, of whom Mr Trickett is Chairman. A formal schedule of matters reserved for decision by the Board
has been adopted. The Board has engaged external firms to provide investment management, secretarial, depositary
and custodial services. Contractual arrangements are in place between the Company and these firms.
The Board carefully considers the various guidelines for determining the independence of non-executive Directors, placing
particular weight on the view that independence is evidenced by an individual being independent of mind, character and
judgement. All Directors are presently considered to be independent. All Directors retire at the AGM each year and, if
appropriate, seek re-election. Each Director has signed a letter of appointment to formalise the terms of their engagement
as a non-executive Director, copies of which are available on request and at the AGM.
Meetings
The Board meets at least quarterly to review the overall business of the Company and to consider the matters specifically
reserved for it. Detailed information is provided by the Managers and Secretaries for these meetings and additionally at
regular intervals to enable the Directors to monitor compliance with the investment objective and the Company’s
investment performance compared with its benchmark index. The Directors also review several important areas
including:
• the stockmarket environment;
• the Company’s investment activity over the quarter relative to its investment policy;
• performance in relation to comparable investment and unit trusts;
• the revenue account, balance sheet and gearing position;
• share price discount (both absolute levels and volatility);
• shareholder register (including significant changes);
• regulatory matters; and
• relevant industry issues.
The Board also holds an annual strategy session to consider, amongst other matters, the Company’s objective and
investment strategy.
Consider Final Approval of the Shareholder Consider Interim Approval of Half Internal Control Corporate
Dividend Annual Report Communication Dividend Yearly Report Review Governance Review
including the
Managers’ policy
on stewardship
Review of Review of Annual Strategy
Gearing significant Review Review Managers’ Board &
interests continued Committee
appointment and Evaluation
remuneration
Detailed review
of Investment Board Review of
Trust Peer Group Composition Directors’ Fees
The following table sets out the Directors of the Company during the financial year, together with the number of Board
and Committee meetings held and the number of meetings attended by each Director (whilst a Director or Committee
member).
Audit
The Board Committee
Director Eligible to attend Attended Eligible to attend Attended
S P Trickett, Chairman 6 6 – –
P M Hay-Plumb 6 6 2 2
D J Jeffcoat (retired 1 March 2018) 1 1 1 1
J Le Blan 6 6 3 3
R A Rae 6 6 3 3
M R Warner (appointed 1 March 2018) 4 4 – –
Conflicts of Interest
Company directors have a statutory obligation to avoid a situation in which they (and connected persons) have, or can have,
a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or may possibly conflict, with the interests of the Company. The Board has in place
procedures for managing any actual or potential conflicts of interest. No conflicts of interest arose during the year under
review.
UK Stewardship Code
The Board and the Managers support the UK Stewardship Code, issued by the FRC, which sets out the principles of
effective stewardship by institutional investors. The Company’s investment portfolio is managed by Aberforth Partners
LLP who invest exclusively in small UK quoted companies and, as a significant investor within this asset class, the
Managers have a strong commitment to effective stewardship.
The Board has reviewed, and endorses, the Managers’ Stewardship Policy, which is available within the literature library
section of the Managers’ website, at www.aberforth.co.uk.
Voting Policy
The Board has given discretionary voting powers to the Managers to exercise the voting rights on every resolution that is
put to shareholders of the companies in which the Company is invested. The Managers vote against resolutions that they
believe may damage shareholders’ rights or economic interests and under normal circumstances these concerns would
have been raised with directors of the company concerned. The Board receives quarterly reports from the Managers on
governance issues (including voting) pertaining to investee companies.
Principal Objective:
The objective of the Committee is to provide assurance to the Board as to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
controls and the integrity of its financial records and externally published results. In doing so the Committee operates
within terms of reference that have been agreed by the Board. These are reviewed annually and are available upon
request.
Principal Responsibilities:
The Committee has been given the following responsibilities:
• ensuring that all of the Company’s principal risks are identified;
• monitoring the mitigating controls that have been established;
• monitoring compliance with the relevant statutory, regulatory and taxation requirements for a UK based
investment trust which is listed on the London Stock Exchange;
• reviewing the Company’s annual and interim financial statements, the accounting policies adopted and the main
judgemental areas;
• ensuring that the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable;
• agreeing the external Auditor’s terms of appointment, determining the independence and objectivity of the
Auditor and assessing the effectiveness of the audit;
• considering whether it is appropriate for certain non-audit services to be carried out by the Auditor;
• reviewing the need for an internal audit function; and
• assessing the going concern and viability of the Company, including assumptions used.
The Chair reports formally to the Board on the Committee’s proceedings after each meeting. To assist with the various
duties of the Committee, a meeting plan has been adopted and is reviewed annually. This is the latest version:
Annual Report Key Risks of the Meetings to be Half Yearly Report Key Risks of the Corporate Key Risks of the
including judgemental Company called if required including Company Governance Company
areas, going concern, judgemental areas, Compliance
viability statement, expense analysis and
letter of Provision of non- Half Yearly Report Investment Trust Investment Trust
representation, audit services, announcement Status Self evaluation of Status
expense analysis and including taxation the Committee
Annual Report compliance services
announcement
Basis of Committee’s Audit Plan Internal Controls
Management Fee Terms of Reference Review including
Custodian’s Audit meeting/ allocation (every reports from the
Controls Report evaluation of the three years) Auditor Plan, Managers and other
update audit including together with the third parties
auditor Terms of
independence Audit Fees Engagement
Investment Trust
Status
Cyber Security
Measures (Aberforth
Partners)
Meetings
Typically three meetings are held each year. Representatives of Aberforth Partners LLP, who provide the Company with
secretarial services, attend all of the meetings. Deloitte LLP (“Deloitte”), the external auditor, attends the meetings in
January and October.
During the last twelve months the Committee has focused on the areas described below.
Financial Reporting
In July 2018, the Committee focused on the preparation and content of the Half Yearly Report, including supporting
documentation from the Secretaries. The Half Yearly Report was not audited, as is customary for investment trusts.
In January 2019, the Committee received a report and supporting presentation from the external auditor on its audit
of the financial statements for the year to 31 December 2018. In addition, the Secretaries reported on the preparation
of the financial results and other relevant matters. The Committee considered these reports in detail and took further
comfort from the internal control and risks review covered below. The Chair of the Committee had previously
discussed the outcome of the audit process and the Annual Report with the audit partner without representatives of
Aberforth Partners being present. As part of its review of the financial statements, the Committee considered the
following significant issues.
Ownership and valuation of The Committee reviewed the Managers’ control framework which includes controls over
the investment portfolio as valuation and ownership of investments. The appointed Depositary is responsible for
at 31 December 2018 holding and controlling all assets of the Company entrusted for safekeeping. The
Committee has reviewed internal control reports from the Company’s Custodian. The
valuation of the portfolio is undertaken in accordance with the accounting policy for
investments as stated in Note 1 to the financial statements.
Revenue recognition including The Committee reviewed the Managers’ control framework which includes controls over
dividend completeness and revenue recognition. The Committee reviewed actual revenue against forecast and the
the accounting treatment of accounting treatment of all special dividends.
each special dividend
recognised during the period
Investment Trust Status The Committee confirmed the position of the Company in respect of compliance with
investment trust status at each meeting with reference to a checklist prepared by the
Secretaries. The position is also confirmed by the external Auditor as part of the audit
process.
Calculation of The Committee reviewed the Managers’ control framework which includes controls over
management fees expenses, including management fees. The Committee reviewed management fees
payable to the Manager. The external auditor independently recalculated the
management fees as part of the audit and no exceptions have been reported.
Alternative Performance The Committee discussed the disclosure of APMs in the Annual Report, including the
Measures (APMs) additional information on these contained in the Glossary.
The Committee read and discussed this Annual Report and concluded that it is fair, balanced and understandable. It
provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, objective and strategy.
Accordingly, the Committee recommended to the Board that the financial statements be approved for publication.
Committee Evaluation
A formal internal review of the Committee’s effectiveness, using an evaluation questionnaire, was undertaken during the
year. The outcome was positive with no significant concerns expressed. In 2016, a formal external review was facilitated
by Lintstock Limited and it was agreed to utilise external facilitators every three years in future.
Julia Le Blan
Audit Committee Chair
25 January 2019
Loss of Office
A Director may be removed without notice and no compensation will be due on loss of office.
Expenses
All directors are entitled to the reimbursement of expenses paid by them in order to perform their duties as a Director of the
Company.
Each Director’s unexpired term is subject to their re-election at the Annual General Meeting in February 2019.
The following table shows the remuneration of the Directors in relation to distributions to Shareholders by way of dividends
and share buy-backs:
Absolute
2018 2017 change
£’000 £’000 £’000
Total Directors’ remuneration 141 136 5
Total dividends in respect of that year 34,473 33,051 1,422
Total share buy-back consideration 32,826 18,142 14,684
Ordinary Shares
Directors Nature of Interest 31 December 2018 1 January 2018
S P Trickett, Chairman Beneficial 7,140 6,860
J Le Blan Beneficial 3,000 3,000
D J Jeffcoat (retired 1 March 2018) Beneficial n/a 7,926
P M Hay-Plumb Beneficial 2,100 2,100
R A Rae Beneficial 4,000 4,000
M R Warner (appointed 1 March 2018) Beneficial 1,000 n/a
There has been no change in the beneficial or non-beneficial holdings of the Directors between 31 December 2018 and
25 January 2019. The Company has no share options or share schemes. Directors are not required to own shares in the
Company.
300%
Investment Companies), on a total return
basis (assuming all dividends reinvested)
since 31 December 2008. This index has
250%
50%
0%
-50%
Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11 Dec-12 Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15 Dec-16 Dec-17 Dec-18
Share Price Benchmark
Note: For further informa on on the above graph, please refer to the Key Performance Indicators page.
Annual Statement
On behalf of the Board and in accordance with Part 2 of Schedule 8 of the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups
(Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013, I confirm that the above Directors’ Remuneration Report summarises,
as appropriate, for the year ended 31 December 2018:
(a) the major decisions on Directors’ remuneration;
(b) any substantial changes relating to Directors’ remuneration made during the year; and
(c) the context in which those changes occurred and decisions were taken.
Declaration
Each of the Directors confirms to the best of their knowledge that:
(a) the financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards, give a
true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company;
(b) the Strategic Report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position
of the Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces; and
(c) the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides information necessary for
Shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, business model and strategy.
Opinion
In our opinion the financial statements of Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc (the ‘Company’):
• give a true and fair view of the state of the company’s affairs as at 31 December 2018 and of its return for the year then ended;
• have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, including FRS 102
“The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland” and the Statement of Recommended Practice
issued by the Association of Investment Companies in November 2014 and updated in February 2018 “Financial Statements of
Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts”; and
• have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
We have audited the financial statements which comprise:
• the Income Statement;
• Reconciliation of Movements in Shareholders’ Funds;
• the Balance Sheet;
• the Cash Flow Statement; and
• the related notes 1 to 22.
The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting
Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice), including FRS 102 “The Financial Reporting Standard applicable
in the UK and Republic of Ireland”.
Conclusions relating to going concern, principal risks and viability statement (continued)
Principal risks and viability statement We confirm that we
Based solely on reading the directors’ statements and considering whether they were consistent with have nothing material to
the knowledge we obtained in the course of the audit, including the knowledge obtained in the report, add or draw
evaluation of the directors’ assessment of the company’s ability to continue as a going concern, we attention to in respect
are required to state whether we have anything material to add or draw attention to in relation to: of these matters.
• the disclosures on page 5 that describe the principal risks and explain how they are being managed or
mitigated;
• the directors' confirmation on page 5 that they have carried out a robust assessment of the principal
risks facing the company, including those that would threaten its business model, future performance,
solvency or liquidity; or
• the directors’ explanation on pages 5 and 20 as to how they have assessed the prospects of the
company, over what period they have done so and why they consider that period to be
appropriate, and their statement as to whether they have a reasonable expectation that the
company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the
period of their assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary
qualifications or assumptions.
We are also required to report whether the directors’ statement relating to the prospects of the
company required by Listing Rule 9.8.6R(3) is materially inconsistent with our knowledge obtained in
the audit.
How the scope of We have performed the following procedures to test the ownership and valuation of the investment
our audit responded portfolio at 31 December 2018:
to the key audit • critically assessed the design and implementation of the controls over valuation and ownership of
matter investments;
• confirmed the valuation of 100% of the listed investments to an independent pricing source;
• confirmed 100% of listed investments at the year end to confirmations received directly from
Northern Trust (custodian) and Natwest (depository); and
• reviewed the internal controls report over Northern Trust, as it applied to custody and attended the
Audit Committee meeting at which the Northern Trust controls report was evaluated to assess the
adequacy of the design and implementation of controls at the custodian.
Key observations Based on the work performed we concluded that the valuation and ownership of investments are
appropriate.
Rationale for the benchmark Net assets has been chosen as a benchmark as it is considered the most relevant
applied benchmark for investors and is a key driver of shareholder value.
Audit Commiee
repor ng threshold
Net Assets £0.23m
Materiality
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to the Committee all audit differences in excess of £230,000 (2017:
£287,000), as well as differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. We also report
to the Audit Committee on disclosure matters that we identified when assessing the overall presentation of the financial statements.
Other information
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information We have nothing to
included in the annual report, other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon to ensure report in respect of
completeness. these matters.
Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and, except to the extent
otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information
and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial
statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or otherwise appears to be materially misstated.
If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to
determine whether there is a material misstatement in the financial statements or a material misstatement
of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material
misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.
In this context, matters that we are specifically required to report to you as uncorrected material
misstatements of the other information include where we conclude that:
• Fair, balanced and understandable – the statement given by the directors that they consider the annual
report and financial statements taken as a whole is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the
information necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and performance, business
model and strategy, is materially inconsistent with our knowledge obtained in the audit; or
• Audit Committee reporting – the section describing the work of the audit committee does not
appropriately address matters communicated by us to the audit committee; or
• Directors’ statement of compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code – the parts of the directors’
statement required under the Listing Rules relating to the Company’s compliance with the UK Corporate
Governance Code containing provisions specified for review by the auditor in accordance with Listing
Rule 9.8.10R(2) do not properly disclose a departure from a relevant provision of the UK Corporate
Governance Code.
Responsibilities of Directors
As explained more fully in the directors’ responsibilities statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial
statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors determine is
necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern, disclosing as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the
directors either intend to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Extent to which the audit was considered capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
We identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and then design
and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, including obtaining audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for our opinion.
Other matters
Auditor tenure
Following the recommendation of the audit committee, we were appointed by the board of directors on 17 April 2013 to audit the
financial statements for the period ending 31 December 2013 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted
engagement including previous renewals and reappointments of the firm is 6 years, covering the years ending 31 December 2013
to 31 December 2018.
Consistency of the audit report with the additional report to the Audit Committee
Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee we are required to provide in accordance with
ISAs (UK).
(a) The maintenance and integrity of the Aberforth Partners LLP web site is the responsibility of the partners of Aberforth Partners LLP; the work carried out by the auditor of
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc does not involve consideration of these matters and, accordingly, the auditor accepts no responsibility for any changes that may have
occurred to the financial statements since they were initially presented on the web site.
(b) Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
2018 2017
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
Note £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Net (losses)/gains on investments 10 – (251,019) (251,019) – 232,376 232,376
Investment income 3 46,263 3,429 49,692 43,676 – 43,676
Other income 3 7 – 7 1 – 1
Investment management fee 4 (3,777) (6,295) (10,072) (3,615) (6,026) (9,641)
Portfolio transaction costs 5 – (2,935) (2,935) – (2,651) (2,651)
Other expenses 5 (742) – (742) (750) – (750)
Net return before finance costs and tax 41,751 (256,820) (215,069) 39,312 223,699 263,011
Finance costs 6 (301) (501) (802) (249) (415) (664)
Return on ordinary activities before tax 41,450 (257,321) (215,871) 39,063 223,284 262,347
Tax on ordinary activities 7 – – – – – –
Return attributable to
equity shareholders 41,450 (257,321) (215,871) 39,063 223,284 262,347
Returns per Ordinary Share 9 45.30p (281.22p) (235.92p) 41.59p 237.73p 279.32p
The Board declared on 25 January 2019 a final dividend of 20.75p per Ordinary Share and a special dividend of 7.75p per
Ordinary Share. The Board declared on 25 July 2018 an interim dividend of 9.50p per Ordinary Share.
The total column of this statement is the profit and loss account of the Company. All revenue and capital items in the above
statement derive from continuing operations. No operations were acquired or discontinued in the year. A Statement of
Comprehensive Income is not required as all gains and losses of the Company have been reflected in the above statement.
Capital
Share redemption Special Capital Revenue
capital reserve reserve reserve reserve Total
Note £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Balance as at 31 December 2017 930 58 148,201 1,206,534 79,919 1,435,642
Return on ordinary activities after taxation – – – (257,321) 41,450 (215,871)
Equity dividends paid 8 – – – – (33,209) (33,209)
Purchase of Ordinary Shares 14 (24) 24 (32,826) – – (32,826)
2018 2017
Note £’000 £’000
Fixed assets
Investments at fair value through profit or loss 10 1,168,165 1,440,496
Current assets
Debtors 11 3,230 3,649
Cash at bank 59 293
3,289 3,942
Approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 25 January 2019 and signed on its behalf by:
Paul Trickett,
Chairman
2018 2017
Note £’000 £’000
Operating activities
Net revenue before finance costs and tax 41,751 39,312
Scrip dividends received 3 (319) –
Receipt of special dividends taken to capital 3 3,429 –
Investment management fee charged to capital 4 (6,295) (6,026)
Decrease/(increase) in debtors 419 (768)
Decrease in other creditors (21) (17)
Net cash inflow from operating activities 38,964 32,501
Investing activities
Purchases of investments (357,515) (301,163)
Sales of investments 376,211 343,405
Cash inflow from investing activities 18,696 42,242
Financing activities
Purchases of Ordinary Shares 14 (32,826) (18,142)
Equity dividends paid 8 (33,209) (28,791)
Interest and fees paid 17 (609) (758)
Net drawdown/(repayment) of bank debt facilities (before any costs) 18 8,750 (27,000)
Cash outflow from financing activities (57,894) (74,691)
3 Income
2018 2017
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
2018 2017
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
5 Other Expenses
2018 2017
£’000 £’000
The following expenses (including VAT, where applicable) have been charged to revenue:
Directors’ fees (refer to Directors’ Remuneration Report) 141 136
Depositary fee 140 180
Secretarial services 102 98
FCA and LSE listing fees 68 57
Registrar fee 66 74
Custody and other bank charges 58 59
Legal fees 27 20
Auditor’s fee – audit of the financial statements 25 24
– for non-audit services – –
AIC fees 21 21
Directors’ and Officers’ liability insurance 11 11
Other expenses 83 70
742 750
6 Finance Costs
2018 2017
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
Interest/non-utilisation costs on bank debt facility 278 462 740 229 383 612
Amortisation of bank debt facility costs 23 39 62 20 32 52
301 501 802 249 415 664
7 Taxation
Analysis of tax charged on return on ordinary activities
2018 2017
Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
£’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
UK corporation tax charge for the year (see below) – – – – – –
Corporation tax at 19% (2017: 19%) 7,876 (48,891) (41,015) 7,422 42,424 49,846
Adjusted for the effects of:
Non-taxable UK dividend income (8,375) (652) (8,966) (7,917) – (7,917)
Non-taxable overseas dividend income (222) – (222) (225) – (225)
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes – 558 558 – 504 504
Excess expenses for which no relief has been taken 721 1,291 1,951 720 1,223 1,943
Non-taxable capital losses/(gains) – 47,694 47,694 – (44,151) (44,151)
UK corporation tax charge for the year – – – – – –
Irrecoverable overseas taxation suffered – – – – – –
Total tax charge for the year – – – – – –
The Company has not recognised a potential asset for deferred tax of £24,177,000 (2017: £22,164,000) in respect of unutilised
management expenses because it is unlikely that there will be suitable taxable profits from which the future reversal of a
deferred tax asset may be deducted. The current main rate of corporation tax is 19% (2017: 19%).
8 Dividends
2018 2017
£’000 £’000
Amounts recognised as distributions to equity holders in the period:
Final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2017 of 19.75p
(2016: 18.75p) paid on 6 March 2018 18,332 17,696
Special dividend for the year ended 31 December 2017 of 6.70p
(2016: 2.75p) paid on 6 March 2018 6,219 2,595
Interim dividend for the year ended 31 December 2018 of 9.50p
(2017: 9.05p) paid on 31 August 2018 8,658 8,500
33,209 28,791
Amounts not recognised in the period:
Final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2018 of 20.75p
(2017: final dividend of 19.75p) payable on 7 March 2019 18,795 18,367
Special dividend for year ended 31 December 2018 of 7.75p
(2017: 6.70p) payable on 7 March 2019 7,020 6,231
25,815 24,598
The final dividend and the special dividend have not been included as liabilities in these financial statements.
2018 2017
10 Investments
2018 2017
£’000 £’000
Investments at fair value through profit or loss
Opening fair value 1,440,496 1,253,247
Opening fair value adjustment (159,308) (9,457)
Opening book cost 1,281,188 1,243,790
Purchases at cost 355,681 298,903
Sale proceeds (376,993) (344,030)
Realised gains on sales 121,190 82,525
Closing book cost 1,381,066 1,281,188
Closing fair value adjustment (212,901) 159,308
Closing fair value 1,168,165 1,440,496
All investments are in ordinary shares listed on the London Stock Exchange unless otherwise stated on pages 14 to 16.
Gains/(losses) on investments:
Net realised gains on sales 121,190 82,525
Movement in fair value adjustment (372,209) 149,851
Net (losses)/gains on investments (251,019) 232,376
11 Debtors
2018 2017
£’000 £’000
Investment income receivable 3,187 3,610
Other debtors 43 39
3,230 3,649
Borrowing facilities
On 16 May 2017, the Company extended the unsecured £125 million Facility Agreement with The Royal Bank of Scotland plc for
a further three years and on 17 April 2018 the Facility Agreement was novated to The Royal Bank of Scotland International
Limited. A 0.15% arrangement fee was paid in connection with the extension in May 2017. This is being amortised over the
expected life of the facility. Under the facility, all funds drawn down attract interest at a margin of 0.80% over LIBOR. A non-
utilisation fee is also payable on any undrawn element at a rate ranging from 0.30% to 0.50%, depending on the level of
utilisation.
The main covenant under the facility requires that, at every month end, total borrowings shall not exceed 25% of the
Company’s total adjusted gross assets. There were no breaches of the covenants during the year. As at 31 December 2018,
total borrowings represented 1.5% of total adjusted gross assets (as defined by the Facility Agreement). The facility is due to
expire on 15 June 2020.
The net asset value total return for the year ended 31 December 2018 is the percentage movement from the net asset value
as at 31 December 2017 of 1,543.72p (31 December 2016: 1,292.57p) to the net asset value, on a total return basis, at
31 December 2018 of 1,305.37p (31 December 2017: 1,578.01p), which is -15.4% (2017: 22.1%).
Due Due
Due between between
On within 3 and 1 and Due after
(All in £’000) demand 3 months 12 months 5 years 5 years Total
22 Company information
Aberforth Smaller Companies Trust plc is a closed-ended investment company, registered in Scotland No SC126524, with its
Ordinary Shares listed on the London Stock Exchange. The address of the registered office is 14 Melville Street, Edinburgh,
EH3 7NS.
Payment of dividends
The best way to ensure that dividends are received as quickly as possible is to instruct the Company’s Registrar, whose address is given
above, to pay them directly into a bank account; tax vouchers are then mailed to shareholders separately. This method also avoids
the risk of dividend cheques being delayed or lost in the post. The Company also operates a Dividend Re-investment Plan to allow
shareholders to use their cash dividends to buy shares easily and at a low cost via the Company’s Registrar from whom the necessary
forms are available.
How to invest
The Company’s Ordinary Shares are traded on the London Stock Exchange. They can be bought or sold by placing an order with a
stockbroker, by asking a professional adviser to do so, or through most banks. The Company’s Managers, Aberforth Partners LLP, do
not offer any packaged products such as ISAs, Savings Schemes or Pension Plans.
Continuation Vote
The Company has no fixed duration. However, in accordance with the Articles of Association, an ordinary resolution will be
proposed at the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2020 (and at every third subsequent Annual General Meeting) that the
Company continues to manage its affairs as an investment trust.
AIC
The Company is a member of The Association of Investment Companies which produces a detailed Monthly Information Service on
the majority of investment trusts. This can be obtained by contacting The Association of Investment Companies, 9th Floor, 24 Chiswell
Street, London EC1Y 4YY; Website: www.theaic.co.uk; Tel: 020 7282-5555.
Financial Calendar
Dividends in respect of the year ended 31 December 2018
Interim Special Final
Rate per Share: 9.5p 7.75p 20.75p
Ex Dividend: 9 August 2018 7 February 2019 7 February 2019
Record date: 10 August 2018 8 February 2019 8 February 2019
Pay date: 31 August 2018 7 March 2019 7 March 2019
Furthermore, in accordance with the Directive, the AIFM’s remuneration policy and the numerical disclosures in respect of the AIFM’s
relevant reporting period (year ended 30 April 2018) are available on request from Aberforth Partners.
Glossary of UK GAAP Measures
Net Asset Value, also described as Shareholders’ Funds, is the value of total assets less all liabilities. The Net Asset Value,
or NAV, per Ordinary Share is calculated by dividing this amount by the total number of Ordinary Shares in issue.
Gearing represents the amount by which total investments exceed Shareholders’ Funds, expressed as a percentage of
Shareholders’ Funds. If stockmarkets rise, gearing can increase the Company’s returns, but, if they fall, losses will be
greater. If the amount calculated is a negative percentage then total investments are less than Shareholders’ Funds.
Share Price Total Return represents the theoretical return to a shareholder, on a closing market price basis, assuming
that all dividends received were reinvested, without transaction costs, into the Ordinary Shares of the Company at the
close of business on the day the shares were quoted ex dividend. The share price as at 31 December 2018 was 1,138.00p
(2017: 1326.00p) and dividends, which went ex dividend during the year (see note 8 on page 47) were 35.95p (2017:
30.55p). The effect of reinvesting these dividends on the respective ex-dividend dates amounted to 31.91p (2017:
34.11p). The share price total return was therefore -11.8% (2017: 22.6%), being the percentage derived from the closing
share price, plus the reinvestment dividend figure, divided by the closing share price at the previous year end.
Discount is the amount by which the stockmarket price per Ordinary Share is lower than the Net Asset Value, or NAV,
per Ordinary Share. The discount is normally expressed as a percentage of the NAV per Ordinary Share. The opposite of
a discount is a premium.
Benchmark Total Return is the return on the benchmark, on a closing market price basis, assuming that all dividends
received were reinvested into the shares of the underlying companies at the time their shares were quoted ex dividend.
Further information on the Company’s benchmark, the Numis Smaller Companies Index (excluding Investment
Companies), can be found on page 4.
Performance Attribution is an analysis of how the Company achieved its performance relative to its benchmark. Sector
and stock selection measures the effect of investing in sectors and securities to a greater or lesser extent than their
weighting in the benchmark.
Active share ratio is calculated by summing the absolute differences between a portfolio’s weight in a stock and an
index’s weight in a stock for all the stocks in the portfolio or index. The total is then divided by two to give a ratio
between 0% and 100%. Active Share is addressed in “How Active Is Your Fund Manager?” (Antti Petajisto and Martijn
Cremers, Yale School of Management, 2009).
Ongoing Charges represent the total cost of investment management fees and other operating expenses of £10,814,000
(2017: £10,391,000), as disclosed in the Income Statement, as a percentage of the average published net asset value
£1,366,495,000 (2017: £1,363,794,000) over the period, and are calculated in accordance with the guidelines issued by
the AIC.
Leverage, for the purposes of the AIFM Directive, is any method which increases the Company’s exposure to
stockmarkets whether through borrowings, derivatives or any other means. It is expressed as a ratio of the Company’s
exposure to its NAV. In summary, the gross method measures the Company’s exposure before applying hedging or
netting arrangements. The commitment method allows certain hedging or netting arrangements to be offset. ASCoT has
no hedging or netting arrangements.
Portfolio Turnover is calculated by dividing the lesser of purchases and sales over one year by the average portfolio value
for that year.