Full Thesis
Full Thesis
Full Thesis
A Thesis Submitted to
Faculty of Humanities and Social Science Department of Rural Development,
Tribhuvan University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree
of the Master of Arts (MA) in Rural Development
By
Bodha Narayan Shrestha
Department of Rural Development
TU, Registration No.: 66119-88
Exam Roll No.:2400010
March. 2018
(1)
LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION
This is to certify that Mr. Bodha Narayan SHrestha has completed this dissertation
entitled "Impact of Drinking Water and Sanitation Project on Local People: A
Study of Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan" under my supervision and guidance. I
therefore, recommend this dissertation for the final approval and acceptance to the
dissertation committee.
………………………..
Krishna Prasad Gyawali
Supervisor
(2)
LETTER OF APPROVAL
Evaluation Committee
…………………………….
Jagadishor Baral
……………………………..
External Examiner
……………………………..
Supervisor
(3)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the Department of Rural
Development for granting me permission to conduct the research entitled "Impact of
Drinking Water and Sanitation Project on Local People, A Study of Pokhara Lekhnath
Metropolitan.” Now, it is in the form of dissertation in partial fulfillment of the
requirement for the Master Degree in Rural Development. It has come to this stage
with the help of different persons and institutions.
Similarly, I am thankful to all the inhabitants of Lekhnath and respected persons from
Lekhnath Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation management committee for their
honest cooperation provided in the field work of this research.
(4)
ABSTRACT
The major objective of this study is to explore the impacts of the project (STWSS) among
the people of Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan after its establishment. To that end,
research questions were raised and combinations of qualitative and quantitative methods
were adopted. Based on the research objectives, the problems associated with the drinking
water, health and sanitation facilities were analyzed and explained in detail. Further, the
changes in their lifestyle have also been explored extensively. The study demands both
exploratory as well as descriptive research design. Generally, the exploratory research
design was used to show the various aspects of the problems of the study area before the
project (STWSS) implementation, while the descriptive research design was used to
describe the effects of the project (STWSS) on Lekhnath people. Observation, interview,
key-informants interview, in depth- interview and focus group discussions were adopted
to collect data. However, the primary data played a dominant role into drawing a valid
conclusion. Some relevant and useful secondary data were also incorporated.
Demographic information such as caste/ ethnicity, religion, occupation, education, age
was reflected. Table, bar diagrams and pie charts were used to analyze the data.
This research proposes to investigate the role of drinking water supply and sanitation
system in bringing the changes in the lives of local people of Pokhara Lekhnath
Metropolitan. Before the project’s construction, people faced problem as they had to
allocate for time for collecting water and they had little attention on other activities. But,
now the continuous engagement in construction and management of drinking water
project has changed their lifestyle. People now started to involve in other development
activities due to availability of water. Both male and female member were actively
participating in the project’s management and maintenance work. Now, people were
satisfied with the project’s establishment.
Per the study, 96.7 percent of the respondents had to use public tap before the project
construction. Similarly, 98.4 percent of the respondents felt that the project construction
has saved a large part of the time invested in fetching water. 77 percent of them express
their view that the tendency of spreading water borne disease after the project
construction is decreasing and 23 percent of them says it is decreasing rapidly. Likewise,
88.5 percent of the respondents have been able to use the saved time in other development
activities.
(5)
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
(6)
CHAPTER - I
INTRODUCTION
Water is one of the basic needs of human beings. It is fundamental to the material
basis of both life and livelihoods. Water serves a variety of purposes: it is used not
only for irrigation the main fields crops, but also for domestic needs such as drinking,
washing and bathing and for home gardens, livestock, trees, and other permanent
vegetation. Other productive uses include aquaculture, transportation, and small rural
enterprises such as brick making. The environmental benefit of water resources
includes direct uses such as harvesting of aquatic plants and animals and the
immeasurable benefit of biodiversity and maintaining natural ecosystems.
Water scarcity affects the rural household, economy and environment in multifarious
ways, resulting in hardships such as the necessity of carrying heavy pots of water
several kilometers everyday to meet household needs, the destitution of farmers and
their families who lose their lands, or of the landless who lose their jobs because of
lack of water for irrigation, the loss of wetlands and estuaries because of water-
depletion upstream, and increasing health problem caused by water- borne diseases
and pollution.
Demands for water supplies for agriculture households and industry have escalated
dramatically in recent decades. Globally, 38 percent of people are living in countries
under severe water stress. So, the availability of adequate water resources for future
generation is not only a regional issue, but is also a subject of concern at global scale.
In Nepal, we find that the very first pipe water supply was introduced in 1895 during
the Rana Regmi. Even though, water was supplied through various sources in Nepal
in different cities, it was only in 1972 that the Department of Drinking Water Supply
and Sewerage was established.
Various types of urban and rural water supply and sanitation projects are now being
implemented within the Government, private and NGO sectors. They are directly and
indirectly linked with environmental health and sanitation status of rural and urban
(7)
people and water supply improvements. These projects are also household based and
have proven to be very effective, not only for water storage during the dry season, but
also for making water available close to the house during the wet season, and
therefore improving hygiene and reducing women’s workload (Sharma 2001).
As population, has steadily grown in many countries, particularly poorer nations, a
correspondent effort to provide this population with safe access to potable water has
not followed suit. More and more access to drinking water for all human beings has
become a priority of sustainable development (Pradhan and Pradhan, 2006).
Nepal, being the second richest country of the world in fresh water resources people
are depriving of safe drinking water. Various reports are showing that with the lack of
safe drinking water many Nepalese people are facing waterborne disease. The Water
Resources Act, Water Resource Regulation, Irrigation policy and Nepal Water supply
and sanitation policy have all recognized important institution of water services users
but their implementation has been remaining very weaker one. Until the end of eight
Plans, 61 percent of the total population of Nepal has had access to drinking water
facility but the quality of the service needs to be considerably increased. The
document of the ninth plan has also presented the long-term perspective on drinking
water and sanitation (for 20 years). Per this, the drinking water facility will be made
available to all the people of Nepal by the end of ninth plan. And within next 20
years, the level of drinking water facility will be classified to enhance the quality of
service. In the sub – sector of sanitation, appropriate sewerage systems with
processing facilities will be constructed in all the densely populated urban areas in the
next 20 years.
(8)
In this context, the present research proposes to investigate the role of drinking water
supply and sanitation system in bringing the changes in the lives of local people of
Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan. It also focuses on people’s way, method for the
management of the water sources.
This proposed study has been conducted on Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan, Kaski
district where water supply system (STWSS) was implemented by Ministry of water
supply.
Water is basic to life and good quality water in sufficient quantities for drinking and
sanitation is a critical determinant of the standard of rural and urban life. The quality
as well as availability of water has a direct impact on the quality of life as well as
livelihoods (Mollinga, 2000).
(9)
But, after the establishment of this project Small Town Water Supply and Sanitation,
people get the facility of drinking water services easily. Its concepts start first in 2001
and it establishes in 2005. This project was financed by Nepal Government (50%) and
User’s Committee (50%). After its implementation, people get healthy life by
minimizing the existing water borne disease. This project ensures community to
involve in water management, hygiene education and other sanitation activities. In
other words, it brought great changes in their daily life that is directly linked with
their socio-economic changes.
So, this study mainly answers to the problem associated with the drinking water,
health and sanitation facilities. It explores the changing pattern of the Lekhnath
people during and after the intervention of this project. To sum up, this study will be
focused on finding out answers to the following question: -
Research question;
1. What necessitated the beginning of the drinking water project in Pokhara
Lekhnath Metropolitan?
2. How was the previous condition before the implementation of the project?
3. Are there any changes after the construction of the project?
4. How did the user’s group contributed in the construction of the project?
1. To trace out the past condition before the implementation of the project
(STWSS) in Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan.
2. To examine the contribution of water user‘s group in this project’s
establishment.
3. To analyze the role of the project (STWSS) in changing the people’s daily life
(10)
1.4 Significance of the Study
This study is an academic study; thus, its immediate importance is the achievement of
the Master’s Degree in Rural Development. Based on several researches, it is noted
that participatory approach is the most important approach for every development
programs. No development program can be successful without this approach. So,
generally to say, this study can provide the concepts about participatory approach.
This study may be helpful to trace out the problems of drinking water in Lekhnath and
it may also be helpful to know about the changing condition of the selected area after
the project’s implementation. It can also provide the knowledge of purification and
sanitation of water. So, in conclusion, this study may be helpful to know about the
effectiveness of the project (STWSS) towards the people after its establishment .This
study can provide about the project’s coverage area. So, the study can act as a
reference for the implementation of future new projects in other places. In addition, it
may be helpful for further research.
(11)
Chapter four presents data analysis and presentation, which is the major part of the thesis.
Chapter five contains the study with summary, conclusion and recommendation.
(12)
CHAPTER - II
REVIEW OF LITERATURES
Lekhnath inhabitants manage the water source by themselves, by making the well
function committee. But, the problem of maximum increasing population has put the
pressure on the water sources and it brings ruin to water sources. If water is used at a
high rate than the reservoirs are replenished, then they must face a tragedy of the
commons. To avoid this, they must change their value, system and morality.
(13)
Sustainable development of water resources requires the full co-operation of water
users. Today the word, ‘participation’ has become a key concern for people-centered
development strategy. So, the true participation must encompass the involvement of
all kinds of groups, caste, ethnicity, religion and economic levels of the community.
According to this concept, the project (LSTWSS) is also developing in the leadership
of the communities by raising the level of public awareness on environment sanitation
and health and hygiene education. It gives more emphasis on the development and
expansion of the technology that can be afforded by the local users /consumers. For
the sustainable development of this project local unit, NGOs and private sector were
optimally mobilized as partners by encouraging the participation of private sectors.
For the implementation of this water supply projects, the most priority is given to the
participation among the backward areas, classes, caste /ethnic groups and
communities. For operation and maintenance of this project, the capacity of the user’s
communities is enhancing. This project also emphasizes on the equitable distribution
of drinking water by mobilizing the popular participation. Women’s participation is
also enhanced in this project.
As of the year 2006 (and pre-existing for at least three decades), there is a substantial
shortfall in availability of potable water in less developed countries, primarily arising
from industrial contamination and pollution. As of the year 2000, 27 percent of the
population of lesser developed countries did not have access to safe drinking water.
Many nations have water quality regulations for water sold as drinking water,
although these are often not strictly enforced outside of the developed world. The
(14)
World Health Organization sets international standards for drinking water. (Upreti,
1999)
Earth surface consists of 70% water. Water is available almost everywhere if proper
methods are used to get it. As a country economy becomes stronger a larger
percentage of its people tend to have access to drinking water and sanitation. Access
to drinking water is measured by the number of people who have a reasonable means
of getting an adequate amount of water that is safe for drinking, washing, and
essential household activities reflects the health of a country’s people and the
country’s capacity to collect, clean, and distribute water to consumers. According to
the United Nations’ World Health Organization (WHO) more than one billion people
in low and middle-income countries lack access to safe water for drinking, personal
hygiene and domestic use. These numbers represent more than 20 percent of the
world’s people. In addition, close to 3 billion people did not have access to adequate
sanitation facilities. (Upreti, 1999).
The main reason for poor access to safe water is the inability to finance and to
adequately maintain the necessary infrastructure. Overpopulation and scarcity of
water resources are contributing factors. The lack of water and the lack of hygiene is
one the biggest problems that many poor countries have encountered in progressing
their way of life. The problem has reached such endemic proportions that 2.2 million
deaths per annum occur from unsanitary water – ninety percent of these are children
under the age of five. One program developed to help people gain access to safe
drinking water is the Water Aid program. Working in 17 countries to help provide
water, Water Aid is useful in helping the sanitation and hygiene education to some of
the world’s poorest people. (Upreti, 1999).
Drinking water is the most important basic need of the human being. It remains on the
top priority in the agenda of rural development. The modern organizational/
(15)
governmental efforts to develop drinking water supply sector has not had long history
as a systematic approach. The Ministry of Water Resources was originally held
responsible for all the drinking water supply under its Department of Irrigation and
Water Supply, which was established in 1966, and the department was performing its
roles till1971. And in 1972, under the umbrella of the Ministry of Water Resources,
the responsibilities for irrigation and drinking water and were separated and the
Department for Water Supply and Sewerage (DWSS) was created. (Upreti, 1999)
In the decade of 1970s, in the international area, two women, one British economist-
Barbara Ward, and the other American anthropologist Margaret Mead individually
initiated the activity for drinking water supply at the United Nations (UN) Conference
on Human Settlement (HABITAT) in Vancouver, 1976. They emphasized for
favorable policy formulation and approvals on water supply and sanitation. The
following year, at the World Water Conference – Argentina was carried forward with
the specific recommendation so that the UN created a ten-year program to focus on
water and sanitation. The General Assembly of UN subsequently passed the
resolution creating the International Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Decade:
1980-1990. To express the commitment on the International Drinking Water and
Sanitation Decade, Nepal Government stated its priority concern to have accessible
piped drinking water supply by the end of sixth five-year plan. According to UNDP
(2001), 80 percent of Nepalese people have access to improved water supply and
sanitation coverage is only 27 percent. (Upreti, 1999).
In the ancient time, drinking water in the village or rural areas was planned by the
rural people themselves. They themselves used to identify the sources and use the
water. The distributions of water were made on the basis of mutual understanding.
They used to maintain the source collectively and use it.
When the modern or organized planned development, activity started, the top down or
centralized approach took over the traditional form of people’s participation. But,
such modern or centralized approach failed due to different reasons. The notion of
people’s participation in drinking water supply was initiated in 1980s and it was
realized that the importance of people participation is must in successful distribution
of safe drinking water. Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Support Program
(RWSSSP) emphasizes the active participation of stakeholders at all levels to increase
(16)
their feeling of ownership. Users are considered as owners and manage of their
scheme from the very beginning. They are trained on the job to organize and
implement their scheme and to improve sanitation in the community. The users and
user's committees are trained and supported in their activities by local NGOs, private
firms and government line agencies. (Upreti, 1999)
(17)
has the main five objectives which have relationship to the social issues (to be
considered for the development of water supply and sanitation):
1. To make the drinking water service available to all the Nepali people by the
end of the Ninth Plan through the gradual development of drinking water
facility and its standard;
2. To make the sanitation facility available to additional 30 percent population by
creating awareness and developing appropriate sanitation facility in the urban
and rural sectors;
3. To mobilize the user’s committees, NGOs, and local government units in the
planning process according to decentralization by strengthening the
decentralized planning system;
4. To contribute maintain the healthy life by the eradicating the existing water-
borne disease of the country by gradually developing the standard of the
drinking water in rural and urban sector; and
5. To develop and expand the drinking water facility by involving the private
sector and entrusting special responsibility to municipal corporations for the
systematic management of drinking water facility in the urban sector. (Upreti,
1999)
(18)
4. Priority of natural water use will be given for drinking water purpose (allocation
basis). Reform will be made in the existing laws and administrative management
to prevent the projects from being implemented due to the dispute in water use
and water source and save the water from being contaminated.
5. Water supply projects in the rural area will be designed and implemented with
the condition of the sharing of at least 10 percent cost (either participation
through labor or cash contribution). Operation and maintenance fund will be
established prior to the inception of construction by involving the
representatives of the users’ side from the planning stage for the operation and
maintenance of the projects after their completion.
6. Special attention will be paid to mitigate adverse effects created by the
development of water supply and sanitation in the area. Environmental impact
assessment will be carried out for this purpose. (Upreti, 1999)
(19)
implementation of water supply and sanitation projects would gradually be reduced.
Technically emphasis would be laid on the technology that can be afforded by the
user communities and sustainably managed by them. Management would also be
made for the optimum utilization of indigenous knowledge, skills and resources.
Institutionally, partnership between and among Non-governmental organization
(NGOs), CBOs and private sector working in water supply and sanitation would be
developed and promoted. Legally, a system would be established to resolve the
conflict regarding water utilization systematically. Economically, indigenous
resource, skills and labor would be optimally utilized through social mobilization.
(Upreti, 1999)
Emphasis would be laid on private sector participation in the construction and
maintenance of large scale and capital-intensive projects. For operation and
maintenance, the capacity of the users’ communities would be enhanced.
Municipalities would be made more responsible for the operation and maintenance of
water supply system by delegating them more powers. The strategies of NWSSP also
emphasizes on the equitable distribution of drinking water by mobilizing the popular
participation. The water supply and sanitation projects would be developed in
accordance with decentralized planning process and the basis of development would
be demand-led or demand-driven. They also have the provision to follow every step to
minimize adverse effects on environment by carrying out initial environment
examination and environmental impact assessment. Institutionally, the central units of
DWSS would be made responsible for policy formulation, technical support,
monitoring and evaluation and local units would be handed over the responsibility of
implementation. The strategies of water supply also focus on the “common
resources”. Women’s participation would be enhanced in the management of water
sector project. (Upreti, 1999)
(20)
sustain hygiene to raise the quality of life and the health of an individual”. The policy
directive itself has addressed the social issues because it states that mobilization of
community is one of the ways to achieve the success in improving sanitation. It also
directs efforts to ensure community involvement women’s involvement in water
management, hygiene education and other sanitation promotion activities as well as
encourage the participation of non-governmental organization and volunteers as
partners in development. The strategies of the policy with social implication are
“community participation,” “distribution of benefits”, “women involvement”, “co-
ordination/ integration”, and “institutional arrangement”. (Upreti,1999).
The National Sanitation and Hygiene Master Plan (SHMP) was endorsed by the
cabinet (including seven ministries and the National Planning Commission (NPC),
and launched formally by the President. The Government has allotted a separate
budget line for sanitation from 2010/11 and gradually building capacity of WASHCC
and allocation of funds from different windows (education, local bodies and as well.
Peoples own contribution and local body leadership is the main success factor for
such great results on sanitation movement. The total sanitation budget in the sector is
approximately 13%. This is one pf the major milestone document that massively
increasing sanitation progress throughout the country.
(21)
different promoters. Previously, sanitation was not given much importance in water
supply schemes, however, at present, both these aspects are considered together
during schemes planning, design and implementation.
So many case studies have been grouped to study about the impacts of drinking water
project. A case study of R. Bohara (1997) on Daugha VDC, Gulmi, based on drinking
water and sanitation, has pointed out several beneficiaries of drinking water project. A
case study of Achut Luitel (1998) on Bajung VDC of Parbat district shows the
multidisciplinary dimension of water resource development i.e. economic and social
development. Neupane (2009) has also studied the impact of drinking water project.
His study was based on rural women of Syanja. He concludes that the project has
brought great changes in the livelihood of rural women as well as all the people of
that study area.
Many rural mountain households in the HKH (Hindu Kush Himalayas) do not have
access to adequate supplies of safe water yet. The use of polythene pipes and cement-
lined storage systems, however, is increasing and these new materials and systems
have alleviated the problems of water scarcity. (Banskota and Chalise, 2000)
UNDP- World Bank, (1996) presents ideas, methods and experiences concerning
gender issues in policy level on water and sanitation sector. The sources book
includes various case studies of Nepal, Pakistan, Brazil, and India. It gives emphasis
on participation also. Sustainable development of water resource requires the full co-
operation of water users. So, generally to say, participation plays vital role in any
kinds of development programmes or resource management. Equitable distribution of
drinking water can be successful by mobilizing the popular participation. As the value
of participation involves equity, equality, social justice and liberty, it provides the
community requisite social capital in decision- making governance, and evaluation as
well as access to the resource located in the state and market. (Bongartz and Dahal,
1996).
ACAP also make the policy of Water Resource. The policy objectives are to provide
clean drinking water to the community as well as to improve sanitation in the area. In
providing access to drinking water, ACAP focuses on gravity water sources and
(22)
policy is to build on, strengthen and/or revive traditional systems. This policy is
oriented towards the development of drinking water schemes along with health and
sanitation programmes. (Thapa and karky, 2003).
Water, particularly safe drinking water, is a scarce good in many parts of the country.
Most settlements and households do not have access to piped water. In such instances,
fetching water from a distant source daily consumes considerable time and energy
particularly of girls and women, who generally perform this task. This is particularly
true of the hill and mountain region (Nepal Human Development Report, 1998). The
Department of water supply and sewerage’s data base shows that 94 percent of
households use an improved drinking water source (DWSS 2016), exceeding the 2015
target of 73 percent. Access to a sanitation facility is also much higher in urban areas
than in rural areas. (Nepal Millennium Development Goals, Progress Report, 2010)
According to the WHO/ UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for water supply and
sanitation (JMP), 37% of the developing world’s population 2.5 billion people lack
improved sanitation facilities and over 780 million people still use unsafe drinking
water sources. (www.unicef.org/wash)
(23)
FIGURE 2.3
Conceptual Framework of the Study
(25)
CHAPTER - III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
(26)
3.5.1 Questionnaire Schedule
A questionnaire schedule was designed for the collection of information from primary
sources. Both open and close ended question were included in the questionnaire
schedule. The questionnaire schedule was pre-tested and errors in questionnaire were
corrected. This interview was conducted with water users group and with water users
as well.
(27)
3.6 Secondary Data Collection
Secondary data was also collected and consulted from reports of the various local
institutional, INGOs, NGOs, District drinking water office, journal, articles,
government policy document and other published materials.
(28)
CHAPTER - IV
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FIELD SURVEY AND DATA
Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan is one of the most densely populated areas in the mid-
hills of Nepal. The household survey carried out in 2011 by SWOG within its
proposed project area in Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan showed a population of
38,012 with 7, 017 households resulting in an average family size of 5.4 persons per
household in the project area of the surveyed wards of Pokhara Lekhnath
Metropolitan.
This area is a Hindu dominant area. About 86.9 percent people are Hindu. Similarly,
6.6 percent people are Buddhism and 3.3 are Hinduism-Buddhism.1.6 is Islam while
1.6 percent is from other religion. People of this area celebrate all types of Hindu
religion festivals. In every “Ekadasi Parva” and major Sanskranti they go to visit
temple. They celebrate small festivals more happily. The holy places of this area are
local temples which were constructed by local people of different areas (wards). They
also celebrate Dashain festival. In this festival, people receive Tika and Prasad from
their elder relatives. They also go to visit temple and to receive Tika and Prasad from
the temple by Pandit. Durga Mandir is famous in this area. So, this temple is the
center point of doing all types of religious activities.
(29)
4.3 Socio-Demographic Profile of the Respondents
In the study area (Ward no.3) of Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan, male population is
55.7percent and female population is 44.3 percent. The socio-demographic profile of
respondents is given below in detail.
(30)
2. Buddhism 4 6.6
3. Hinduism-Buddhism 2 3.3
4. Islam 1 1.6
5. Others 1 1.6
Total 61 100.0
Source: Field Survey, 2018
The data in the table 4.2 reveal that 86.9 percent of the respondents of this study area
were Hindu. Similarly, 6.6 percent people were Buddhism, 3.3 percent people were
Hinduism-Buddhism. 1.6 percent people were Islam 1.6 percent people were in
others. This shows the prevalence of Hindus as dominant religious community in the
study area. In fact, this more or less characterizes the religious composition of the
whole Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan.
(31)
As shown in the figure 4.1, out of the total respondent's 29.5 percent were belonged to
the age group 35-35. Similarly, 27.9 percent of them belonged to the age group 25-35.
23 percent were belonged to the age group 45-55. The respondents below 25 were 9.8
percent and the respondents above 55 were also 9.8 percent.
(32)
Similarly, 21.3 percent of them were Bachelor passed and 13.1 percent were master
passed.
(33)
Table 4.4: Source of Water of the Respondents before LDWSS
Source of Water Frequency Percent
Public tap 59 96.7
River 1 1.6
Private tap 1 1.6
Total 61 100.0
Source: Field Survey, 2018
According to the table 4.4, for 96.7 percent of the respondents, public tap was the
dominant source of water. Besides, this they used to collect water from river and
private tap. To sum up, the main water sources of this area before the LDWSS were
public tap, river and private tap. People of this area were facing hard problem to fulfill
their daily water needs.
The painful moments for the busy housewives rushing for fetching water from the tap
provided by Red Cross Society ten years ago, the unpurified water connected through
pipes from the tanks which were not cleaned for long times, and people had to face
water borne diseases. Such were the major problems the people in Lekhnath were
facing.
(34)
Figure .1: Source of Collecting Water before LDWSS’s
implementation
4.4.1 Time Spent for Collecting Water before the Project Construction
(Implementation)
Since, people had to visit public tap for collecting water before the project
implementation, naturally it required these people to allocate a longer time for
fetching water. This was because they had to wait their turn to fetch water from the
public tap. The given table shows more information on it.
Table .4.5
Times Spent for Collecting Water before the Project Implementation
Category Frequency Percent
Less than 10 minutes 43 70.5
More than 10 minutes 18 29.5
Total 61 100.0
Source: Field Survey, 2018
As the table 5.1 shows that 70.5 percent of the respondents had to spent 10 minutes or
less for fetching water while 29.5 percent of the respondent had to spent more than 10
minutes for fetching water. This shows the problem of the people of Lekhnath before
(35)
the project construction in which they had to spend their important time to collect
water. We can see these types of problems in many rural areas of our country.
Table .4.6: Times Spent for Collecting Water after the Project Construction
Category Frequency Percent
Less than 10 minutes 51 83.6
More than 10 minutes 10 16.4
Total 61 100.0
Source: Field Survey, 2018
As table 6.1 explains that 83.6 percent of the respondents have to spend 10 minutes or
less to fetch water for domestic purpose and 16.4 percent of them need more than 10
minutes to fetch water. From this, it is clear that LDWSS project plays a significant
role in changing people’s daily life. Now people are using their saved time in
productive and creative activities.
(36)
Table .4.7: Times Saved due to Water System
Category Frequency Percent
Yes 60 98.4
No 1 1.6
Total 61 100.0
Source: Field Survey, 2018
From the above data, it is clear that 98.4 percent of the respondents felt that the
project construction has saved a large part of the time invested in fetching water. They
are now happy as they gradually started to spend their saved time in other productive
works.
(37)
income. Likewise, 19.7 percent of the respondents have been able to generate income
in little way and 8.2 percent of the respondents were indifferent to generate income.
From the above table, it is clear that 77 percent of the respondents express their view
that the tendency of spreading water borne disease after the project’s construction is
decreasing and 23 percent of them says that it is decreasing rapidly. Their opinion
about the tendency of spreading water-borne diseases clearly shows changes in
Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan.
(38)
sanitation. The following table 6.5 shows some views of the respondents related to
this issue.
(39)
As the table 6.6 clearly reveals that, 63.9 percent of the respondents were positive
towards the establishment of the project in Lekhnath. In other words, they were
positive towards the project’s benefits. Likewise, 36.1 percent of the respondents
were too positive towards the project. In other words, these people were positive to
the benefits of the project and success to take benefits from the project. In general,
positive impacts can be observed in overall health, hygiene and sanitation of
household and community after the project implementation.
(40)
As shown in the figure 7.1, 26.2 percent of the female respondents said that they were
encouraged by themselves to participate actively from the household in LDWSS
activities. Likewise, 31.1 percent of the male respondents show their participation
from the household in the project’s activities and 42.6 percent of both male and
female were more participated from the household towards the drinking water
project’s activities. These data clearly show that there is also equal participation of
male and female in drinking water project’s activities.
As the table 7.1 demonstrates that 27.9 percent of the respondents thought that there
was a very good participation of people in LDWSS activities while, 68.9 percent of
the respondents viewed it as a normal participation. This data clearly shows the level
of people participation in LDWSS activities.
(41)
Table 4.13: Involvement of Local People in Decision Making of the Operation
and Maintenance Activities
Category Frequency Percent
Higher 17 27.9
Less 27 44.3
Adequate 15 24.6
Negligible 2 3.3
Total 61 100.0
Source: Field Survey, 2018
According to the table 7.2, 27.9 percent of the respondents said that they are
continuously involved in the operation and maintenance activities of the project, while
44.3 percent of them expressed that they are less participated in this activities and
24.6 percent of them are adequate and 3.3 percent of them are negligible.
The table shows that 50.8 percent of the respondents were involved in sanitation
work. Similarly, 26.2 percent of the respondents were involved in health program and
(42)
8.2 percent of them were in school management activities. Likewise, 3.3 percent of
the respondents were involved in other kinds of development activities.
According to the table 7.4, 75.4 percent of the respondents said that they were
satisfied with the project activities. Similarly, 23.0 percent of the respondents felt that
they were happier with the project establishment.
(43)
CHAPTER - V
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Summary
This study was carried out among the users of Lekhnath small town drinking water
supply and sanitation system in Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan, ward no. 3, Kaski
district. The general objective of the study is to explore the major impacts of the
project (STWSS) among the people in the selected area, Pokhara Lekhnath
Metropolitan, after its establishment. But, it had three-fold specific objectives stated
as follows:
1. To trace out the past condition before the implementation of the project
(STWSS) in Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan.
2. To examine the contribution of water user’s group in this project’s
establishment.
3. To analyze the role of the project (STWSS) in changing the people’s daily life.
Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan has mixed types of castes from caste/ethnicity point
of view. People of Brahmin, Chhetri, Gurung, Magar, Newar, B.K. etc community are
living in the different wards. Brahmin is the major populated caste. In other words,
Pokhara Lekhnath Metropolitan is a Brahmin dominated society. To cater to the
increasing demands of drinking water and sanitation facilities for faster growing
towns and markets centers, Government of Nepal has invited a community supported
water supply and sanitation project with financial assistances from the Asian
Development Bank (ADB). This project is called Small Town water Supply and
Sanitation Project. Its concepts start first in 2001 and it established in 2005. This
project was financed by Nepal Government (50%) and User’s Committee (50%).
Before the projects establishment, the people of that area were facing greater problem,
as the sources of water was very small. But, after the establishment, people get the
facility of drinking water services easily. After its implementation, people get healthy
life by eradicating the existing water borne disease. This project ensures community
to involve in water management, hygiene education and other sanitation activities. It
is also developing in the leadership of communities by raising the level of public
awareness on environment sanitation and health and hygiene education. It gives more
emphasis on the development and expansion of the technology that can be afforded by
the local users.
(44)
For the implementation of this water supply projects, the most priority is given to the
participation among the backward areas, classes, caste/ethnic group and communities.
Women’s participation is also enhanced in this project. For operation and
maintenance of this project, the capacity of the user’s community is enhance.
Before the project’s implementation, people used to fetch water from public tap as
well as river which were more time consuming work. They faced problem as they had
to allocate more time for collecting water and they had little attention on other
activities. But, now the continuous engagement in construction and management of
drinking water project has saved their time, decrease work lead, also improved health
and sanitation activities. We can see great changes in their economic activities. People
now used their saved time in economic activities which brought great changes in their
income generation. Most of the people started to use saved time in agriculture works.
From this, they are not fulfilling their need of vegetable, but also they are making
some economic gains by selling vegetable
For the sustainable development of the project local unit, NGOs and private sector
were optimally mobilized as partners by encouraging the participation of the private
sector. Both male and female member were equally involved in the project’s
development activities. They were equally involved in decision making of the project
activities. Likewise, they were playing important role in project’s operation and
maintenance activities. Both male and female members were actively participated
from the household in the project’s management and maintenance works. Due to the
availability of water people now involved in other development works. People now
involved in school management activities. Health Programme Sanitation work as well
as other kinds of development activities. They are now happy and satisfied in all
respects with the project establishment.
5.2 Findings
This study has made some important findings. Among them, the major findings made
by this study have been summed up as given below:
• Among all the respondents, 26.2 percent of the female respondents said that
they were actively participated in the LDWSS activities. Likewise, 31.1
percent of the male respondents show their participation from the household in
(45)
the project activities and 42.6 percent of both male and female were more
participated from the household in the LDWSS activities.
• 75.4 percent of the respondents said that they were satisfied with the projects
establishment. Likewise, 23 percent of the respondents felt that they were
happier with the project’s implementation.
• Similarly, 27.9 percent of the respondents said that they are continuously
involved in the operation of and maintenance activities of the project, while
44.3 percent of them expressed that they are less participated in this activities
and 24.6 percent of them are adequate and are 3.3 percent of them are
negligible.
• 27.9 percent of the respondents thought that there was a very good
participation of people in LDWSS activities. While, 68.9 percent of the
respondents viewed it as a normal participation.
• After the construction of the project, 88.5 percent of the respondents have
been able to use the saved time in other development activities.
• Among them, 50.8 percent of the respondents were involved in sanitation
work. Similarly, 26.2 percent of them were involved in health programme and
8.2 percent of them were in school management activities. Likewise, 3.3
percent of the respondents were involved in other kinds of development
activities.
• Similarly, 63.9 percent of the respondents were positive towards the
establishment of the project and 36.1 percent of them were too positive
towards the project. In general, positive impacts can be observed in overall
health, hygiene and sanitation of household and community after the project
implementation.
• 57.4 percent of the respondent shows their view that there is satisfactory
changes in household sanitation after the project’s implementation and 36.1
percent of them says that there is clearness then before in household sanitation
after the project implementation and 6.6 percent of them says no differences at
all.
• Similarly, 36.1 percent of the respondents have been able to generate some
income very nicely and other 36.1 percent were significant to generate
income. Likewise, 19.7 percent of the respondents have been able to generate
(46)
income in little way and 8.2 percent of them were indifferent to generate
income.
• 77 percent of the respondents express their view that the tendency of spreading
water borne disease after the project construction is decreasing and 23 percent
of them says it is decreasing rapidly.
• Similarly, 98.4 percent of the respondents felt that the project construction has
saved a large part of the time invested in fetching water.
• 70.5 percent of the respondents had to spend 10 minutes or less for fetching
water while 29.5 percent of them had to spend more than 10 minutes for
fetching water before the construction of the drinking water project.
• Now, 83.6 percent of the respondents have to spend 10 minutes or less to fetch
water after the project’s construction.
• 96.7 percent of the respondents had to use public tap for collecting water for
drinking and other household uses.
5.3 Conclusion
This study explores the changing pattern of Lekhnath people in drinking water, health
and sanitation. With the access to water, there has been an increase in socio-economic
life. People of this place have been successful in taking the benefits due to the
availability of water. They were successes in saving time due to the supply of
drinking water which helps them to involve in other development activities. For the
poor people and poorest households, the saved time has helped them to generate
income. In other words, these people used their saved time in economic activities
which brought great changes in their income generation. Most of them started to use
saved time in agriculture works. From this, they are not only fulfilling their need of
vegetable, but also, they are making some economic gains by selling vegetables.
The main change from the water supply system is that it makes people to participate
in communities’ sanitation program. This project ensures community to involve in
water management, hygiene education and other sanitation activities.
The second change is that the tendency of spreading water borne disease is
decreasing. People get healthy life by eradicating the existing water borne disease. For
the better improvement of the project, the most priority is given to the local people
(47)
participation. Women’s participation is also enhanced in this project. So, the
participation of people in LDWSS system operation and maintenance activities
brought changes in their daily life. Now people get the opportunities to participate in
community activities like school management, health program, sanitation work and
other kinds of development activities.
(48)
REFERENCES
Banskota, M and Chalise, S.R.(2000). International Centre for Integrated Mountain
Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Bohara, R. (1997) “Rain water potential source for drinking water and sanitation” A
case Study of Daugha VDC,Gulmi.
Bongartz, H.and Dahal, D.R. (1996). Development Studies: Self-help organization,
NGOs and civil society, Kathmandu, Nepal Foundation for Advanced Studies.
Luitel, A. (1998) “Need of integrated water resources management at village level”
A case study of a pilot project in Bajang VDC, Parbat District
Mollinga, P.P. (2000). Water for food and rural development approaches and
initiatives in South Asia, Sage, New Delhi.
Nepal Human Development Report, (1998) Access to Safe Water and Sanitation,
Nepal South Asia Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal
Nepal Millennium development goals, progress report, (2010) “The proportion of
people without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic
sanitation”, National planning commission, government of Nepal, Singha
Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal
Neupane B. P., (2007). “Impacts of drinking water project on rural women, A
ssociological appraisal of Pelakot Udiyachour Drinking Water Project”,
Pelakot, Syangya A Dissertation, Submitted to the Department of Sociology
and Anthropology, T.U., P.N. Campus, Pokhara, Nepal.
Pradhan, P. K. and Pradhan B. (2006) Environment and Natural Resource. Concepts,
Methods, Planning and Management, Kathmandu, Nepal
Thapa, G. J. and Karky, B. S. (2003).Water knowledge experiences from the
Annapurna Conservation Area.
UNDP – World Bank (1996): Water resource management policy paper, World Bank
Uprety Laya, P. (1999). "A review Paper on social component in water resources
strategy formulation." Kathmandu, a paper submitted to consolidated
management Services, Nepal (P): Ltd. Nepal.
URL: www.Unicef.org/wash/
URL: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
(49)
APPENDIX A
Interview Schedule
Household Survey:-
House No:-
Name of the Respondent:- Date:-
Family Information
S.N. Age Gender Marital Status Education Occupation
General Information
S.N. Question Answer
1. Age
2. Gender a. Male b. Female
3. Education a. Illiterate b. Literate c. Up to class 5
d.SLC e. Intermediate f. Bachelor g. Master
4. Religion a. Hindu b. Buddhism c. Hinduism-
Buddhism d. Islam e. Others ( Specify)
5. Caste/Ethnicity a. Brahmin b. Chhetri c. Gurung d.
Magar e. Tamang f. Thakuri g. Newar
h. B.K. i. Others( Specify)
6. Occupation a. Service b. Business c. Wage
Labouring d. Farming e. Others(Specify)
7. Sources of Income a. Service b. Business c. Wage
Labouring d. Farming e. Pension f.
Others(Specify)
8. Sources of water a. Public Tap b. Rainwater c. Pond
before LDWSS d. River e. Well/Inar f.
Others(Specify)
(50)
9. Distance of water a. Less than 10 minutes b. More than 10
source minutes
(51)
8. Has any significant change occurred in income generation activities after
launching of the DWSS system?
a. Yes, very much
b. Significant
c. Little
d. Indifferent
9. Where you are investing your saving time made by water easiness?
a. Social work
b. Economic activities
c. Agricultural work
d. Caring for children
10. What is the tendency of water-borne diseases after the commencement of the
DWSS system?
a. Decreasing rapidly
b. Decreasing
11. Why did you want DWSS system in your house?
a. To save time
b. To get rid of diseases
c. To lessen morbidity
12. Has any impact been observed in overall health, hygiene and sanitation of
household and community after launching the DWSS system?
a. Too positive
b. Positive
c. Negative
13. Are people involving in other development works because of availability of
water facility?
a. Yes
b. No
14. If yes where are they involving?
a. School management
b. Health programme
c. Sanitation work
(52)
d. Others
15. Are you happy in all respects with the launching of the New DWSS system?
a. More happy
b. Satisfied
c. Indifferent
d. Unhappy
16. Are you involved in Water Users Committee?
a. Yes
b. No
17. Are you ever involving in DWSS system management and maintenance works?
a. Yes
b. No
18. What is the degree of your involvement in decision making of the operation
and maintenance activities of the DWSS system?
a. Higher
b. Less
c. Adequate
d. Negligible
19. Are there any major problems related with LDWSS system maintenance and
regulations?
a. Late on water fee collection
b. Less interest of women
c. Less interest of male
d. Dam damage on rainy time
20. What was the role of local people in DWSS activities?
a. Very good participation
b. Normal participation
c. No participation
d. Carelessness on it
21. How is the water users called in LDWSS emergency work?
22. Are people encouraged to be participated in LDWSS system’s activities?
23. Who is more participating in the LDWSS system related work from your
house?
a. Female member
(53)
b. Male member
c. Both
24. Will you tell any suggestion and comments for the smooth development of
LDWSS system?
1. Comments
a.
b.
c.
d.
2. Suggestion
(54)
APPENDIX B
List of Key Informants
S.N. Name Designation
1. Shiva Chandra Amatya Chairperson
2. Hari Bahadur Thapa Serviceman
3. Kuldip Baral Member
4. Ramkrishna G.C. Member
5. Bindu Subedi Member
(55)