Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    SOPY3085 Rubrics - Reflection Paper

    Uploaded by

    chanchunsumbrian
    This document provides the marking criteria for a reflection paper assignment worth 20% of the grade in a policy processes and politics course. The criteria are organized into three sections evaluating critical evaluation and reflection, literature review and theoretical conceptualization, and organization and referencing. Each section lists descriptors for excellent, good, satisfactory, marginal pass, and poor performance and the maximum scores possible for each level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    SOPY3085 Rubrics - Reflection Paper

    Uploaded by

    chanchunsumbrian
    5 views1 page
    This document provides the marking criteria for a reflection paper assignment worth 20% of the grade in a policy processes and politics course. The criteria are organized into three sections evaluating critical evaluation and reflection, literature review and theoretical conceptualization, and organization and referencing. Each section lists descriptors for excellent, good, satisfactory, marginal pass, and poor performance and the maximum scores possible for each level.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    SOPY3085 Rubrics_Reflection Paper

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides the marking criteria for a reflection paper assignment worth 20% of the grade in a policy processes and politics course. The criteria are organized into three sections evaluating critical evaluation and reflection, literature review and theoretical conceptualization, and organization and referencing. Each section lists descriptors for excellent, good, satisfactory, marginal pass, and poor performance and the maximum scores possible for each level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    5 views1 page

    SOPY3085 Rubrics - Reflection Paper

    Uploaded by

    chanchunsumbrian
    This document provides the marking criteria for a reflection paper assignment worth 20% of the grade in a policy processes and politics course. The criteria are organized into three sections evaluating critical evaluation and reflection, literature review and theoretical conceptualization, and organization and referencing. Each section lists descriptors for excellent, good, satisfactory, marginal pass, and poor performance and the maximum scores possible for each level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Hong Kong Baptist University

    Department of Social Work


    SOPY 3085 Policy Processes and Politics
    Reflection Paper Marking Criteria (20%)

    Student Name: Student No.:


    Criteria Max Score Your Score
    Critical Evaluation of the Subject/Application of Theoretical Concepts and Reflection (10%)
     Applies several key concepts from class to the article review. Demonstrates Excellent
    sophistication of thought. Uses relevant examples for discussion. Central argument is (9-10)
    clearly communicated and worth developing. Acknowledgement of contradictions and
    limits and their logical implications.
     Begins to acknowledge the complexity of the central idea/argument and the possibility of Good
    other points. Some relevant examples are used. Applies at least one key concept from (7-8)
    class related to the review’s theme to the reflective report.
     Adequate but weaker and less effective in responding to central idea of the review. Satisfactory
    Presents central idea/argument in general terms and usually does not acknowledge other (5-6)
    views. Some irrelevant examples used. Terms are often defines on dictionary definitions.
    Implies key concepts, but doesn’t make clear link to class resources to the reflective
    report.
     Does not have or propose a clear central idea or argument or does not responding to the Marginal pass
    review. The central idea or argument may be too vague or need to be developed (3-4)
    effectively.
     Does not respond to the paper topic/theme, lack a central idea or argument, and may Poor
    neglect to use relevant class sources to substantiate argument. Does not apply any (0-2)
    theoretical concepts.
    Adequate Literature Review/Theoretical Conceptualization (5%)
     Uses concepts or evidence appropriately and effectively, providing sufficient literature Excellent
    review and explanation to convince. (5)
     Begins to offer reasons to support its points, perhaps using varied kinds of concepts or Good
    evidence. Begins to integrate the evidence and explain connections between literature (4)
    and main ideas.
     Often uses generalizations to support its points. Examples used may be not relevant and Satisfactory
    depend on unsupported opinion. Often has lapses in logic (3)
     Depends on clichés or overgeneralizations for support, or offers little evidence of any Marginal pass
    kind. Summary rather than analysis. (2)
     Uses irrelevant details or lacks supporting evidence entirely. May be unduly brief. Poor
    (0-1)
    Organization and Referencing (5%)
     Uses a logical structure appropriate to review’s subject, purpose, and disciplinary field. Excellent
    Appropriate referencing is used in main text and bibliography. (5)
     Shows a logical progression of ideas and uses fairly sophisticated sub-topic and Good
    transitional devices; may move from least to more important ideas (simple to complex). (4)
    Though some logical links may be faulty, each paragraph clearly relates to paper’s
    central theme. Most reference sources in main text and bibliography are provided in
    systematic but inappropriate form.
     May list ideas or arrange them randomly them only and lack of logical sequence. Satisfactory
    Paragraphs may be overly general, and arrangement sentences within paragraphs may (3)
    lack coherence. Reference sources are not quoted in main text, though there is a
    bibliography.
     May have random organization, lacking paragraph coherence and using few or Marginal
    inappropriate transitions. Paragraphs may lack main ideas and may not all relate to pass(2)
    paper’s theme. Referencing is patchy.
     No appreciable organization; Paragraphs lack of logic and coherence; No referencing. Poor
    (0-1)
    Total Score: ______________(Out of 20%)

    Further comments (if needed):______________________________________________________________________________

    Signature of Lecturer: Date:


    1
    Last updated in Nov 2017

    You might also like