PBS 9
PBS 9
PBS 9
www.elsevier.com/locate/mseb
Received 29 November 2002; received in revised form 22 March 2003; accepted 7 April 2003
Abstract
A novel route was developed to prepare PbS and HgS nanocrystals in ethanol solvent in the presence of sodium hydroxide by
microwave heating method. PbS and HgS nanocrystals were obtained with an average size of approximately 10 and 6 nm,
respectively. In the reaction, mercury acetate and lead acetate were used as mercury and lead source; sulfur powder was employed as
chalcogenide source. The products were characterized by X-ray powder analysis (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM),
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and UV /Vis absorption spectroscopy. The probable mechanism was presented.
# 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
have reported the synthesis of HgS and PbS nanocrys- and the reaction was performed under ambient air for 20
tals in ethanol solvent. Zeng and his co-workers min. The microwave oven followed a working cycle of 6
prepared HgS nanocrystals in ethanol by a solvothermal s on and 24 s off (20% power). In the process of
method. The reaction was conducted in an autoclave for conventional heating method, the same amount of
12 h and the size of the as-prepared HgS nanocrystals reagents and solvent was placed in a round-bottom
was about 40 nm in diameter [20]. Qiao et al. reported flask and the reaction was conducted with constant stir
the preparation of nanocrystalline PbS in ethanol by at approximately 60 8C for about 1 h. After the reaction
employing gamma-radiation method [24]. finished, the black precipitates were centrifuged, washed
Herein, we present a quick, convenient and safe way with absolute ethanol and acetone, and dried in the air.
to synthesize HgS and PbS nanoparticles in ethanol The final products were collected for further character-
solvent in the presence of sodium hydroxide. The izations.
reaction could be preformed in short time. The average
size of as-prepared HgS and PbS was only approxi-
mately 6 and 10 nm. To the best of our knowledge, HgS 3. Results and discussion
and PbS nanocrystals were synthesized in alkali ethanol
by microwave method for the first time. The products 3.1. XRD, XPS and TEM studies
were characterized by X-ray powder analysis (XRD),
transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photo- The XRD and XPS were used to investigate the
electron spectroscopy (XPS) and UV/Vis absorption composition and purity of as-prepared HgS and PbS
spectroscopy. The probable mechanism was presented. nanoparticles. The XRD patterns of as-prepared PbS
and HgS nanoparticles by conventional heating and
microwave heating method are shown in Fig. 1. The
2. Experimental sections diffraction peaks correspond to the (111), (200), (220),
(311), and (222) planes, which can be indexed to the pure
2.1. Materials and instruments cubic phase for PbS and HgS. No peak of any other
phase is detected. The intensities and positions of the
All the reagents used in the experiment were of the peaks are in agreement with the literature pattern
analytical purity and were used without further purifica- (JCPDF card No. 6-0261 and 5-0592). The average
tion. Mercury acetate, lead acetate and sodium hydrox- size of the PbS (Fig. 1a) and HgS (Fig. 1c) nanoparticles
ide were purchased from Shanghai Second Chemical synthesized by conventional heating method is calcu-
Regent Factory (China). Sulfur powder was purchased lated to be approximately 35 and 10 nm, respectively,
from Shandong Chemical Research Institute (China). according to Debye/Scherrer formula. In contrast, the
Distilled water was used in the experiments. average size of PbS (Fig. 1b) and HgS (Fig. 1d)
Experiments were carried out in a commercial micro- nanoparticles prepared by microwave heating method
wave oven (Sanle General Electric Corp., Nanjing, is approximately 10 and 6 nm accordingly. The XPS was
China). The instrument consisted of a 150 ml reactor employed to investigate the composition and purity of
immersed into the resonant cavity, and equipped with as-prepared HgS nanoparticles prepared by microwave
refluxing condenser pipe [25]. The X-ray diffraction
(XRD) patterns were recorded on a Shimadzu XD-3A
X-ray diffractometer (Cu Ka radiation, l /0.15418
nm). The TEM images were obtained by employing a
JEOL JEM-200CX instrument, working at 200 kV
accelerating voltage. The X-ray photoelectron spectra
(XPS) measurements were performed on ESCALAB
MKII instrument, using non-monochromatized Mg Ka
X-ray as the excitation source. Shimadzu UV-2401
spectrophotometer was used to record the UV /Vis
absorption spectra of the as-prepared particles.
2.2. Synthesis
3.3. Discussion
Fig. 4. The TEM images of as-prepared HgS and PbS nanoparticles: (a), (c) the HgS and PbS nanoparticles prepared by microwave method; (b), (d)
the HgS and PbS prepared by conventional heating method.
expected HgS and PbS nanoparticles were generated, contrast, in ethyl ether, black HgS and PbS could be
which indicated that sodium hydroxide played an obtained, but most of the reactants, such as sulfur
important part in the synthesis. Secondly, in the powder, still remained in products. It is well known that
experiments, we tried to use other solvents, such as the behavior of solvent under microwave irradiation has
water, ethyl ether and toluene, to replace ethanol. It was a close relationship with its polarity; the increasing
found when water and toluene was acted as solvent, no polarity resulted in the increasing absorptive ability of
expected HgS and PbS was obtained. The final color of microwave energy [29]. Dielectric constants could be
solution was nacarat and milky white in the preparation used as criterion to judge the absorptive ability of
of HgS and PbS by using water as solvent, which is microwave energy. The dielectric constants of water,
indicative of the formation of HgO and Pb(OH)2, while ethanol, ethyl ether and toluene at 25 8C are 78.5, 24.3,
in toluene, the reaction did not proceed at all. In 4.3 and 2.4 correspondingly. Although the dielectric
T. Ding, J.-J. Zhu / Materials Science and Engineering B100 (2003) 307 /313 311
Fig. 4 (Continued)
constants of water is much more larger than that of We proposed that the temperature played an important
ethanol, the formation of HgO and Pb(OH)2 make it role in accelerating the reaction. Berlan [30] demon-
hard to convert them to final products. strated that due to the delicate balance between dis-
In our experiments, conventional heating method was sipated energy and heat losses, there was an over-heated
used as a control experiment. It was found that pure PbS phenomenon in ethanol solvent by using microwave-
and HgS nanoparticles were also obtained by conven- heating method, while the same phenomenon was not
tional heating method, but the average size of HgS and observed in conventional heating method. It would be
PbS was large and the reaction time was apparently long one of the reasons that microwave-assisted heating
in comparison with microwave heating method. The method could greatly improve the rate of the reaction.
reaction was also conducted by constant stir without With microwave irradiation in polar solvents, high and
heating, but no expected products could be synthesized. uniform heating could be provided and temperature
312 T. Ding, J.-J. Zhu / Materials Science and Engineering B100 (2003) 307 /313
Fig. 5. The particle size distribution picture of HgS and PbS prepared
by microwave heating method: (a) HgS (b) PbS.
[9] T. Trindade, P. O’Brien, X.M. Zhang, M. Motevalli, J. Mater. [20] J. Zeng, J. Yang, Y.T. Qian, Mater. Res. Bull. 36 (2001) 343.
Chem. 7 (6) (1997) 1011. [21] Y.D. Li, Y. Ding, H.W. Liao, Y.T. Qian, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 60
[10] F.E. Kruis, K. Nielsch, H. Fissan, B. Rellinghaus, E.F. Wasser- (7) (1999) 965.
mann, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 (4) (1998) 547. [22] J.J. Zhu, S.W. Liu, O. Palchik, Y. Koltypin, A. Gedanken, J.
[11] Z.P. Qiao, Y. Xie, Y.J. Zhu, Y.T. Qian, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 77 (2) Solid State Chem. 153 (2) (2000) 342.
(2000) 144 /146. [23] W.S. Sheldrick, M. Wachhold, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 36
[12] S. Maheshwar, K.S. Ramaiah, K. Mukul, M. Neumann-Spallart, (1997) 206.
C. Levy-Clement, J. Electroanal. Chem. 436 (1-2) (1997) 49. [24] Z.P. Qiao, Y. Xie, J.G. Xu, Y.J. Zhu, Y.T. Qian, J. Colloid Interf.
[13] H.S. Zhou, I. Honma, H.H. Komiyama, W. Joseph, Mesosc. Sci. 214 (2) (1999) 459.
Mater. Clusters (1999) 187. [25] A.A. Jose, A.M. Peiro, S. Lahcen, V. Elena, D. Xavier, P. Jose, J.
[14] C.W. White, J.D. Budai, A.L. Meldrum, S.P. Withrow, R.A. Mater. Chem. 10 (2000) 1911.
Zuhr, E. Sonder, A. Purezky, D.B. Geohegan, J.G. Zhu, D.O. [26] S. Tsunekawa, T. Fukuda, A. Kasuya, J. Appl. Phys. 87 (2000)
Henderson, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 504 (1999) 399. 1319.
[15] Y. Xie, P. Yang, Y.T. Qian, Chem. Lett. 7 (1999) 655. [27] S.S. Kale, C.D. Lokhande, Mater. Chem. Phys. 59 (1999)
[16] J.J. Zhu, S.W. Liu, O. Palchik, Y. Koltypin, A. Gedanken, J. 242.
Solid State Chem. 153 (2) (2000) 342. [28] J.P. Yang, F.C. Meldrum, J.H. Fendler, J. Phys. Chem. 99 (1995)
[17] H. Wang, J.R. Zhang, J.J. Zhu, J. Crystal Growth 233 (2001) 829. 550.
[18] X.H. Liao, J.J. Zhu, H.Y. Chen, Mater. Sci. Eng. B B85 (2001) 85. [29] D.R. Baghursl, J. Chem. Soc. Commun. 9 (1992) 674.
[19] A.G. Saskia, Chem. Soc. Rev. 26 (1997) 233. [30] J. Berlan, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 45 (4) (1995) 581 /589.