MUSIC AND MOVEMENT Feierabend
MUSIC AND MOVEMENT Feierabend
MUSIC AND MOVEMENT Feierabend
Still many persons have not developed basic sensitivities which would allow them to function
musically in society. Most adults should be able to demonstrate basic musical behaviors including
While elusive of definition, the third behavior-expressive sensitivity when listening and/or
responding to music-is critical in coming to understand the communication of music. In The
Republic, Plato speaks about music as an art form, in that music has the potential to deliver a
message “below the surface.” When a fine composer creates compositions, he/she uses the tools of
music to communicate something below the surface. It is hoped that such compositions will, then
fall into the hands of insightful performers who will realize the composer’s communicative intent in
the music. Still, if the audience lacks the expressive sensitivity necessary to hear the message below
the surface, that message has fallen on deaf ears. Necessary sensitivities to the expressive qualities
in music must be nurtured during the earliest months of life.
If we believe adults should be able to sing to their children and dance with their spouses and
appreciate good quality music literature, then we must sing to our babies, and dance with our
babies, and do both with quality children’s music literature. Then when those babies become 30
years old, they will be musically sensitive and be able to provide an appropriate nurturing musical
environment for their children.
One hundred years ago many families instinctively engaged their very young children in activities
that were ideal for developing musicality. No one studied early childhood music education, and
there was very little need for classes to be offered to infants and toddlers with their parents.
Today we are discovering that during the past hundred years the musical sensitivities of each
generation have been gradually devastated by the side effects of an increasingly sophisticated
technological environment. Instead of making music, most only consume it-and the nutritional
value of much of that musical consumption has become increasingly empty. While research is
piquing our interest and is supporting a variety of reasons why music and movement experiences
are important in the earliest years, it is interesting to note what previous generations did. Long
before research advised us about what might be appropriate musical stimulation in the early years
parents were naturally sharing musical activities with their infants and toddlers. These activities
provided ideal experiences for nurturing a healthy neural network which is so necessary to fostering
musical comprehension, coordination, and expressive sensitivity.
I have conducted interviews with many senior citizens who were asked to recall a song, rhyme, or
game that could be played with a baby on their lap.[1] Those citizens over 80 were able to offer a
remarkably diverse repertoire. When other in the 60- to 80-year-old bracket were asked the same
question, only some repertoire could be delivered. A third group between 40 and 60 recalled very
little, and parents who were 40 years old and younger essentially “didn’t know nothin’.” What
happened to this genre of literature that so perfectly fostered musical growth in infants and
toddlers?
During the past 100 years families have been redefined. Where once there were large families living
in close proximity, now the nuclear family is smaller and more geographically dispersed. This shift
in family community has strained the continuation of aural traditions. The playful songs and
rhymes, once shared by generations of adults with children, are gradually being forgotten. Those
songs and rhymes that demonstrated community affection and endorsement-and were orally
transmitted from one generation to the next-are being replaced by commercially imposed “ear
candy,” literature that provides a temporary rush but lacks long-term nutritional value.
Quality Literature
• If children are to develop a sophisticated spoken vocabulary, they must hear a sophisticated
vocabulary.
• If children experience good grammar, enunciation, and expressive speaking they will
assimilate those skills.
• If children hear a limited vocabulary, incorrect grammar, and poor enunciation, they
likewise will assimilate those language patterns.
• If children are read to in an expressive voice, they will later read aloud and to themselves
with appropriate expression.
• If children are to grow into adults that have a thirst for good books, they must be nurtured
with exemplary children’s literature.
• If children are to develop healthy bodies, they must be nurtured with healthy food and
exercise.
• If children are to grow to appreciate good music, they must be nurtured with excellent
examples of children’s music literature sung with sensitive expression.
So what is good literature? There are several criteria which can be used to determine if a song is an
excellent example of music literature for this young age. Of primary importance is the use of songs
and rhymes in which the text relates to the make-believe world of the young child. The words
should invite the child into the fantasy of riding a horse or encountering a bunch of pigs. Good
children’s books are full of wonder, are interesting to adults and children, and are still delicious
after 30 readings. Good children’s songs demonstrate those same qualities. They are wonder-full,
are appealing to adults and children, and are still pleasurable to sing after many, many repetitions. If
a song loses its appeal after repeated singing, then, like chewing gum losing its flavor, it is not
worthy of nurturing a child’s musicality.
After determining if the words are sufficiently child-like (not childish), observe the relationship
between the words and the melody. The marriage of words and melody in a children’s song should
embody all the subtleties of natural spoken inflection. The melody should serve as an extension of
the natural expressiveness of the spoken line. The rhythm should be close to the rhythm that would
naturally occur if speaking the words. The melody should reflect the ups and downs, dramatic
moments, intensifications, and repose of spoken inflection.
Many songs seem to neglect this relationship between words and melody, Read the words of a song
as if speaking the poetry of the words. Listen to where the spoken rhythm and pitch inflections
occur. Does the melody enhance those natural inflections or undermine, the expressive potential?
During the second phrase of “Frère Jacques” the question is asked, “Dormez vous?” Here, the
melody goes up like a natural inflection in the voice when asking a question. This is no accident. It
is an example of how in folksongs melody emerges naturally from language. Yet, when we sing the
same song with the English words we put the question with the first phrase of the melody and ask
the musical question with a statement rather than a question. This careless marriage of words and
melody undermines an opportunity to influence the development of expressive sensitivity.
If the text is sufficiently wonder-full, and the melody is natural to the spoken rhythmic and melodic
inflection, the printed score is still no more than a skeleton of the music. Notation in its printed
form is not music. To sing songs as printed on the page is analogous to reading a story with no
inflection. There is nothing in the words of the story to indicate where or how to speak expressively,
and yet a good reader brings the words to life with expression. Likewise, music notation gives no
guidance as to appropriate expressiveness. Yet, the artistic singer has an intuition for the nuances
necessary to bring the skeleton of a song to life. Musical expressive sensitivity can only be
developed by listening to other singers who exemplify expressive singing. If children are read to
often and with expression, they will assimilate that concept and when later reading aloud, will bring
those words to life. Similarly, children must be sung to with appropriate expression in order to
nurture their instinct for musical expressive sensitivity. The songs and rhymes of our grandparents
have demonstrated community endorsement. They are excellent examples of wonder, are an
excellent marriage of words and music, and are still delicious after many singings. We should
nurture our children with such musical expressions that emerged naturally out of an expressive need
and not out of commercial expression. Zoltan Kodály, the Hungarian who completed his studies
first in linguistics and later in musicology, understood the importance of music that was birthed out
of inspiration rather than financial gain.
So by communicating only inferior music, the schools cut off the way to a higher development of the
musical sense. In the name of good taste and of the Hungarian spirit alike, school literature
generally used today must be protested against. I include in this the greater part of unison songs,
too. Some writers of textbooks consider Hungarian children idiotic by tutoring them with such little
verses and songs as could be improvised much better by any sound child given the chance.[2]
It is not advisable to peruse (these) collections. At first one laughs, then one becomes annoyed, and
finally one despairs and cannot imagine that in a country where such things are printed and even
sung aloud, there may still be room for anything better. And what about the masses for whom this
remains their only music? Can we be surprised if, by the time they grow up, they cannot get any
further than the music of the trashiest hit? [3]
By 6 months of age, Patricia Kuhl of the University of Washington reports, infants in English-
speaking homes already have different auditory maps (as shown by electrical measurements that
identify which neurons respond to different sounds) from those in Swedish-speaking homes.
Children are functionally deaf to sounds absent from their native tongue. The map is completed by
the first birthday. “By 12 months,” says Kuhl, “infants have lost their ability to discriminate sounds
that are not significant in their language, and their babbling has acquired the sound of their
language.”[4]
Similarly, infants need to hear and feel music early on if they are to begin to make sense of it. If,
however, certain neurological pathways are not built early, they will become increasingly difficult
to build later. The time to build and maintain those information highways is during the first months
of life.
In an earlier article,[5] I compared the child’s developing mind to growing vegetables. For example,
growing a brain might be compared to nurturing a tomato crop. Initially we plant more seeds than
we expect to use. After the seeds have begun to grow, we thin out those which show the least
promise. This allows the more promising plants sufficient space and nutrients to prosper. Seeds
which are neglected in the early stages of germination are not ever likely to recover fully. While the
plants should never be neglected, it is more detrimental to neglect them for two weeks in the
beginning stages of development than to neglect them for two weeks in mid-summer.
The young child’s mind is, in many ways, like that tomato crop. Initially the brain produces an
abundance of neural pathways. Those pathways that show the most promise are maintained and
intensified. Those that are neglected, atrophy. It is during the first two years of life that the brain
will begin to determine which seeds to nurture-according to the available experiences. In his
landmark book, Frames of Mind, Howard Gardner reports
Éin human beings the density of synapses increases sharply during the first months of life, reaches a
maximum at the ages of 1 to 2 (roughly 50% above the adult mean density), declines between the
ages of 2 and 16, and remains relatively constant until the age of 72. [6]
The strength and efficiency of synaptic connections determine the speed and power with which your
brain functions. The most important news about synapses is that they are formed, strengthened, and
maintained by interaction with experience.
It is much more difficult to reorganize a brain than to organize it in the first place. Organization
inhibits reorganization. Carving out neuronal tracks for certain types of learning is best
accomplished when the synapses for that particular skill are most malleable, before they “firm-up”
around certain types of responses.[7]
In the same book Healy presents the concept of “two directional” thinking and provides a
considerable amount of support for the need to evoke responses from children. Information that
only travels “in” (as in most television viewing) does not promote the necessary brain activity to
nurture synaptic development. Learning which evokes responses from the child promotes the
appropriate brain activity that stimulates synaptic growth. Healy quotes Phyllis Weikart as follows:
Feeling (the beat) has to be independent for the child; you can’t make it loud and you can’t make it
visual as in videos; it has to be felt. Unless the child is rocked, patted, stroked, danced with at the
same time, unless adults are creating the feel of the beat for the child who is hearing it, that feel of
beat does not develop.[8]
When these fascinating concepts are applied to music learning it is easy to realize the importance of
appropriate musical experiences during the first two years. During these years, when the mind is
making sense of the world, musical syntax is developing. Beat, meter, rhythm, tonality, and
expressive sensitivity should be presented. Would you not talk to a baby simply because he/she
cannot talk? Then why should we wait to introduce music until the child can sing and move? And
while 100 years ago it was more common for infants and toddlers to receive precisely the correct
kind of nurturing, today’s parents of infants and toddlers need to be re-introduced to the wonder-full
songs and rhymes that can develop their children’s musicality. Classes for infants and toddlers with
their parents can provide an opportunity to share songs and rhymes that are both excellent examples
of music literature and are appropriate for developing the musical mind.
One hundred years ago these needs were addressed in the home. Through interviews with the
elderly it has become apparent that adult/baby games were much more prevalent in our
grandparents’ generation than they are today. Today’s parents need classes which present an
appropriate repertoire to use with their infants and toddlers. Beat, meter, melody, tonality, wonder,
and expressive sensitivity can still be easily assimilated through the same kind of songs, rhymes,
and games that nurtured musicality in our grandparents and great?grandparents.
Bounces
Bouncing an infant or toddler on one’s knee is the adult-child activity most often recalled by the
elderly. Bounces provide an ideal experience of the beat for young, children. These wonder-full
rhymes and songs embody make-believe, provide an opportunity to learn beat and meter, and often
consist of delightful melodies.
To market, to market,
To buy a fat pig.
Home again, home again,
Jiggity-jig.
Newborn babies can experience bounces as well as mature toddlers. With adults sitting on the floor,
legs outstretched, young infants can be laid on one’s lap while the adult lifts the knees on the beat
and recites the rhyme.[9] Slightly older babies that can support their head can sit upright on an
adult’s knee. During the bounce it is best if the toddlers’ feet can touch the floor since that will
encourage toddlers to initiate the beat motion by pushing off from the floor. Be sure to adjust the
tempo of the rhyme to complement the tempo of the baby’s movement.
Wiggles
While there are not as many, wiggles recalled by the elderly as bounces, there are many more
recalled than “This little piggy went to market.” Wiggling each finger or toe from largest to smallest
has inspired dozens of rhymes that embody all the desired music nutrition, including wonder.
Most young infants will not allow you to wiggIe their fingers. Instead, wiggIe their toes. As they
grow they will allow their fingers to be wiggled with the beat. Later, the toddlers’ musical response
can be evoked by having them wiggle your fingers while you chant the rhyme, but be careful to
follow each child’s demonstrated tempo.
Tickles
Tickles were traditionally performed by an adult tracing a circle in the palm of a young child. The
primary object of the rhyme would be for the adult’s fingers to walk up the baby’s arm on the beat,
usually ending with a gentle tickle.
Young infants will not open their hand to allow you to trace a circle in their palm. Instead, set the
infant in your lap and gently tap on the infant’s stomach in a circular pattern as if to tap on the
different numbers on a clock dial (See Figure 1). Older infants and toddlers can be encouraged to
take a more active role by tracing the circle in the adult’s palm and walking the beat up the adult’s
arm.
Tapping
Tapping the beat onto the infant or toddler was a game often shared by adults and babies. Here, the
adult accompanies songs and rhymes with tapping on the baby’s face or on other parts of the body;
most tapping was done on the bottom of baby’s foot.
Initially the adult will tap onto the infant, but gradually the toddler can be encouraged to tap onto
him/herself or onto the bottom of the adult’s foot.
Clapping
There are only a few songs or rhymes for clapping with baby. “Pat-a-Cake” is a favorite one that
has endured.
While these games are most commonly performed with the adult’s holding onto the child’s hands, it
would be better to evoke a movement response from infants or toddlers by placing their hands
palms down while the adult taps up onto the baby’s palms (See Figure 2). It makes no difference if
the hands of an infant younger than 6 months are held during clapping games. It is best to tap up
onto the palms of a baby older than 6 months. Soon the child will begin tapping down onto the
palms of the adult. Be sure to sing or speak the rhyme, following the tempo of the baby’s
movements; remember, holding the baby’s hands to “help” him/her feel the beat is like holding the
baby’s lips and moving them up and down to say “mama.”
Simple Songs
Children should experience songs of all complexities. Most of the songs in the above categories (i.e.
bounces, wiggles, tickles, tapping, clapping) either have no tunes, or the melodies are too complex
for a 2-1/2 year-old to sing. Therefore a short portion of each lesson should be devoted to songs that
will be simple enough for toddlers to acquire.
Rain, rain
Go away-
Come again
Some other day
While infants or toddlers may not sing during this time, planting these songs in the children’s
memory will provide a warehouse of singable songs-once the children discover their singing voice.
Simple Circles
Simple circle games are reserved for those children who can toddle about with or without assistance
of an adult. They provide a structure to songs that usually end with a surprise lift or “fall down.”
Each toddler walks around a circle with an adult. Adults may walk side-by-side with the toddlers or
walk just behind to provide additional balance. It is best if hands are not held to form this circle, as
it is difficult for toddlers to twist their bodies while holding hands. It is best simply to walk in the
direction the toes are pointing without holding hands.
Each lesson might end with a lullaby. After singing the lullaby several times, it is then hummed
once or twice. The magic spell cast by the ethereal humming is unparalleled in musical nurturing at
this age.
Promoting musical development in infants and toddlers is necessary if the neural pathways are to
develop for later musical sensitivities. If we expect audiences in the concert halls in 30 years, then
we had better pay attention to the musical nurturing of our infants and toddlers. Songs and rhymes
which were traditionally shared 80-plus years ago continue to be a most appropriate means of
nurturing musicianship. Today’s infants and toddlers could greatly benefit from the natural play and
the wonder-full music and rhyme literature that our grandparents intuitively shared with their
children. Somehow, they just seemed to know what was right.
Footnotes:
1. For the past 15 years I have made a concerted effort to interview senior citizens about what
they remembered about playing with infants. I would ask them the same question: “Do you
remember any songs or games that you played with baby in your lap?” My graduate students
have also interviewed seniors using this question. The results were the same: those over the
age of 80 had the largest repertoire of songs and games to play with baby.
2. Kodály, Zoltan. (1974). “Children’s Choirs.” The Selected Writings of Zoltan Kodály, p.
125. London: Boosey and Hawkes.
3. Kodály, Zoltan. (1974). Music in the Kindergarten. The Selected Writings of Zoltan Kodály,
p. 142. London: Boosey and Hawkes.
4. Begley, Sharon. (1996, February 19). Your Child’s Brain. Newsweek, p. 57.
5. Feierabend, John M. (1995). Music and Intelligence in the Early Years. Early Childhood
Connections, 1, (2), 5-13.
6. Gardner, Howard. (1983). Frames of Mind, p. 44-45. New York: Basic Books.
7. Healy, Jane. (1990). Endangered Minds, pp. 53-54. New York: Touchstone Books.
8. Healy, Jane. (1990). Endangered Minds, p. 172. New York: Touchstone Books.
9. This may also be done with the adults sitting in a chair and lifting the heels to bounce baby
on the beat.
Figures from: Feierabend, John M. (1986). Music for Very Little People. London: Boosey &
Hawkes, pp. 24, 44.