Effect of Sic/Si N Micro Reinforcement On Mechanical and Wear Properties of Friction Stir Welded Aa6061 T6 Aluminum Alloy

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Research Article

Effect of SiC/Si3N4 micro‑reinforcement on mechanical and wear


properties of friction stir welded AA6061‑T6 aluminum alloy
Nitesh Kumar1 · Vinay Kumar Patel2

Received: 6 November 2019 / Accepted: 20 August 2020 / Published online: 27 August 2020
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Abstract
Friction stir welding (FSW) is extensively used to join aluminum alloys components for applications in structural, aviation
and automotive sectors. In this investigation, the mechanical properties (tensile strength, percentage elongation, and
microhardness), abrasive wear properties and microstructure of friction stir welded joint of AA6061-T6 were studied by
inter-plate reinforcing of silicon carbide microparticles (µSiC) and silicon nitride microparticles (µSi3N4). The friction stir
welding was performed at different tool rotational speed (TRS) (750, 1000 and 1400 rpm) and welding speed of 56, 80
and 112 mm/min. The friction stir welded joint without reinforcement and with µSiC exhibited maximum tensile strength
at two combinations of welding speed and tool rotational speed; one at welding speed of 112 mm/min, TRS of 1000
RPM and other at welding speed of 56 mm/min and TRS of 1400 rpm. It was realized that the reinforcement of µSiC and
µSi3N4 decreased the tensile properties of the welded joint but improved the abrasive wear and microhardness proper-
ties considerably in the stir zone. The reinforcement of µSiC during FSW demonstrated better tensile, microhardness and
abrasive wear resistant properties than the FSW joints with µSi3N4 reinforcement. The improvement in microhardness
of the FSW joint reinforced with SiC and S­ i3N4 microparticles is attributed to the pinning effect produced by the hard
particles inclusions.

Keywords Friction stir welding · Mechanical properties · Silicon nitride · Silicon carbide · Aluminum alloy

1 Introduction aluminium alloy decreases the mechanical properties sig-


nificantly in the weld area due to partial annealing, over-
’Friction stir welding is a solid-state welding technique heating, overaging and coarse weld microstructure and
mostly employed in the welding of aluminium alloys which wide heat affected zone (HAZ). A recent advancement in
is free from major weldability problems such as cracking FSW is reported on the usage of sensor for controlling and
and porosity encountered in fusion joining [1, 2]. In friction monitoring of FSW process and a roadmap is developed
stir welding, a non-consumable tool is used with especially to use industry 4.0. Sensors are being used to control the
designed pin which is plunged into and along the adjoin- force, torque, temperature, current power vibration etc.
ing line of two pieces of the similar or dissimilar materials. during FSW process [6].
Tool rotational speed, speed of welding and tilting angle AA6061 series aluminum alloys being of light weight
are the main parameters which affect the joint properties reflect moderate strength and are widely employed in
in FSW [3–5]. Although FSW is a good welding process for structural, aviation and automotive sectors. The heat treat-
Al alloys as it is free from many welding defects yet FSW of able aluminum alloy AA6061-T6 is not subjected to full

* Vinay Kumar Patel, vinaykrpatel@gmail.com | 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Meerut Institute of Engineering and Technology,
Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250005, India. 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Engineering
and Technology Ghurdauri, Pauri Garhwal, Uttarakhand 246194, India.

SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:1572 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03381-y

Vol.:(0123456789)
Research Article SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:1572 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03381-y

annealing during the welding operation but subjected to treatment. Microstructure and mechanical behavior of
partial annealing and overaging process. This Al alloy is friction stir welded Mg alloy were analyzed before and
very gullible to time at temperature; higher temperature after heat treatment and it was reported that the ten-
and long duration; which leads to decay in strength of the sile strength, efficiency and elongation were improved
base material as well as adjacent to the weld zone. Hence, by heat treatment [15]. If option of PWHT is selected,
it becomes imperative to control the various parameters the ability of filler alloy in response of the heat-treat-
such as preheating, interpass temperatures and overall ment should be assessed. Generally, the filler alloys do
heat input during FSW of the heat-treatable alloys. Usually, not respond to PWHT if there is not significant dilution
the most common heat-treatable alloys like AA6061T6, with the heat-treatable aluminum alloy. This cannot be
lose a large proportion of their mechanical strength after easily achieved and it is difficult to control it normally.
friction stir welding. For example, AA6061T6 normally For this reason, filler alloys have been developed to
owns a tensile strength of 310.26 MPa before welding and independently respond to heat-treatment. The second
after welding, its strength reduces to 186.15 MPa [7]. This option is to control the process parameter such as tool
problem can be overcome by two ways: one technique rotational speed and feed which is responsible for heat
is the post heat treatment of the alloy after the weld- generation during welding and thus the reduction in
ing to acquire its mechanical strength back to original mechanical properties can be avoided. The influence of
state. Some authors performed post weld heat treatment welding parameters on mechanical and microstructural
(PWHT) on friction stir welded AA6061T6 and observed properties of friction stir welded AA6061 joint was ana-
that the welding efficiency was decreased by 65% as com- lyzed and maximum hardness 85 HV was measured at
pared to base metal due to Portevin–Le Chatelier (PLC) 950 RPM and 3 passes. It was also found that number of
effect, but the post weld heat treatment diminished the weld passes and TRS had significant effect on the grain
PLC effect and consequently improved the properties back size [16]. Kumar et al. [17] estimated the heat input and
to original state [8, 9]. process forces as function of different process param-
The metallurgical effects of temper condition and post eters in FSW and found that the tool speed, welding
weld heat treatment has been widely studied on the fric- speed, probe diameter and tool shoulder diameter were
tion stir weldability of similar and dissimilar aluminum the critical process parameters which affected the heat
alloy. İpekoğlu et al. [10] studied the effect of both O input and FSW process forces. Kumar et al. [17] observed
and T6 temper conditions on friction stir weldability of that the axial thrust (Z-force) was generally affected by
AA6061 aluminum alloy and observed that the O temper the rotational speed, tool diameter, and welding speed.
condition displayed an increment in hardness in the weld Astarita et al. [18] performed an experiment to find the
region due to grain refinement whereas those welded in mechanical properties of the welded joints of AA6061T6
T6 temper condition revealed a significant hardness drop Aluminum alloy made by arc and FSW and found that the
in the weld region resulting from over-aging. Further, joints produced by FSW had greater mechanical strength
İpekoğlu et al. [11] investigated the effect of temper con- than the joints that was welded by manual argon-arc
dition prior the joining and PWHT on microstructural and welding. The mechanical properties of the welded joints
mechanical properties of friction stir butt-welded AA7075 obtained by FSW process was very much dependent on
aluminum alloy and revealed that the FSW resulted in a the sizes of the tool and the size of the rubbing shoulder;
strength under-matching when the AA7075 was welded when the tool size was larger, the better properties were
in T6 condition while a significant strength over-matching obtained. Various researchers proposed different meth-
was recorded in the joints produced in O temper condi- ods to decrease the heat input for example decreasing
tion. The PWHT resulted in a significant recovery in the of TRS to travel speed ratio, cooling of plates by water
strength and thus joint performance when welded in T6 during FSW [19], and using of backing plate for cool-
condition. There was a decrease in the joint performance ing purpose [20, 21] but most of these methods were
value of the joints welded in O temper condition although found effective in reducing the heat input only in HAZ
the strength was increased. In another study of PWHT of and TMAZ and had not much effect on the stir zone [22,
FSWed AA6061 Al-alloy of different temper condition, 23]. Accordingly, a different method is required to regain
İpekoğlu et al. [12, 13] found that the PWHT enhanced the hardness lost during FSW due to partial annealing
the mechanical properties of the AA6061 alloy in both of the joint which can be achieved by using a reinforce-
O and T6-temper conditions much higher than those of ment powder such as silicon carbide (SiC) and silicon
respective as-welded plates and comparable to those of nitride ­(Si3N4) in the welding zone which is believed to
the respective base plates. enhance the hardness and wear resistance properties of
Liu et al. [14] reported an improvement in the strength aluminum alloy. Eftekharinia et al. [24] studied the wear
of ZK60 alloy by post heat compression and ageing properties and microstructure of AA6061/SiC surface

Vol:.(1234567890)
SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:1572 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03381-y Research Article

composite obtained from friction stir processing by min of welding speed while for maximum tensile elonga-
using different types of pins and number of passes and tion the parameters were obtained at TRS of 1300 rpm and
concluded that the geometry of the pin had major role welding speed of 60 mm/min. These finding has been used
in the distribution of the particle and it also affected the for the parameter selection process of this experiment.
microhardness of stir zone. They found that the stir zone This study aims to perform the FSW of AA6061-T6 with a
hardness was maximum when square shaped tool was different combination of tool rotational speed and feed to
used due to better dispersion of silicon carbide particle identify the best combination of these two parameters at
resulting in uniform microhardness variation. The num- which proper heat is generated to produce sound welding.
ber of pass also affected the microhardness and maxi- Further, the objective is to find the effect of reinforcement
mum microhardness was found with four passes. Ahmed of silicon carbide and silicon nitride in the welding zone
et al. [25] investigated the effect of welding parameters on tribo-mechanical properties of the friction stir welded
on friction stir welded joint of AA6082 reinforced with joints.
aluminium oxide ­(Al2O3). Different TRS and reinforced
percentage of ­Al2O3 was taken. Marzoli et al. [26] inves-
tigated the properties of FSW of A ­ l2O3/20p reinforced 2 Material and experimental setup
AA6061 alloy and concluded that the stirring effect of
the tool influenced the distribution of reinforcement In this experiment, AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy sheets of
particles and its shape. Kumar et al. [27] studied the dimension 60 mm × 150 mm with 5 mm thickness were
effect of Zn as an alloying element at the joint interface used for friction stir welding. The micropowders of sili-
and found that the phase constituents were important in con carbide (average particle size ~ 20 µm) and silicon
deciding the soundness of the welded joints. Li et al. [28] nitride (average particle size ~ 45 µm) were introduced in-
investigated the effect of different welding parameters between the AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy sheets during the
on mechanical properties and microstructure of AA6061- FSW process. Based on the earlier optimized parameters
T6 butt welded joints by a stationary type shoulder and for defect-free weld joints as discussed in the introduction
concluded that the hardness profiles in both HAZ and section, for maximum tensile strength and maximum ten-
TMAZ of AA6061T6 SSFSW joints revealed the softening sile elongation, the process parameters in this experiment
regions along the both retreating side and advancing have been selected as TRS of 750, 1000 and 1400 rpm and
side. The lowest hardness value was observed as 60% welding speed of 56, 80 and 112 mm/min to conform the
of the base metal hardness and the welding speeds had earlier findings as well as the limitations of FSW machine.
more influence on the hardness profile as compared to At first, a total of 9 different samples were welded with
the tool rotation speeds. Tool pin profile had also an different combinations of TRS and travel speed without
effect on tensile strength of the joint. Marzbanrad et al. any kind of micro-powder addition. A rectangular groove
[29] performed experiments with different tool pin pro- of width and depth of 1.4 mm and 2.0 mm respectively
files and evaluated the microstructural and mechanical was machined out along the top center-line of two adjoin-
properties of friction stir welded joint and concluded ing plates using a shaper machine for accommodating
that the peak temperature was higher in square pin 1.2 g of SiC and 1.0 g S­ i3N4 microparticles. The FSW tool
profile than any other tool pin profile, and the higher (Fig. 1) was prepared on a lathe machine from mild steel
temperature favored the plasticizing of the mixture and and further tempered at 900 °C to increase its strength and
solid diffusion and the superior tensile properties were hardness. A square-pin (6 mm x 6 mm) geometry was used
found with square pin profile. for better dispersion of silicon carbide and silicon nitride
Balasubramanian et. al [30]. demonstrated optimized microparticles in the welding zone. The shoulder diam-
process parameters of TRS of 1100 rpm and welding eter and pin length of the FSW tool were kept 18 mm and
speed of 100 mm/min for producing defect-free friction 4.5 mm respectively. A total 27 FSW joints were prepared
welded joints in AA6061 aluminum alloy. Similarly, Raja- as shown in Table 1.
kumar et al. [31] found the optimized process parameter The samples for the tensile testing were prepared by
of TRS of 1178 rpm and welding speed of 115 mm/min. cutting the welding joint in the direction perpendicular to
In another study, Rajkumar et. al [32]. obtained the opti- the welding direction by using a power hacksaw. The ten-
mized process parameter of TRS of 1150 rpm and welding sile test specimen was prepared according to the ASTM-E8
speed of 84.3 mm/min for producing the greatest tensile [34] standard consisting the stir zone in the center of gage
strength in FSW of 6061 aluminum alloy. In a similar study, length and the tensile test was performed on universal
Heidarzadeh et al. [33] demonstrated that the optimum testing machine (UTM). The microhardness of the welding
process parameters to get maximum tensile strength of zone was measured by a Vickers microhardness tester with
FSW joints of AA6061 alloy were 920 rpm of TRS, 78 mm/ a load of 5 kgf for 10 s. The samples were also prepared for

Vol.:(0123456789)
Research Article SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:1572 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03381-y

welding speed of 112 mm/min and 1000 rpm is shown in


Fig. 2a–d respectively.
Figure 3 shows the optical and SEM images of the
stir zone of FSW specimen welded at welding speed of
112 mm/min and 1000 rpm without reinforcement (a and
b), reinforced with the silicon carbide particles (c and d)
and reinforced with silicon nitride (e and f ) microparti-
cles. The EDS spectra of friction stir welded joints with the
inter-layer reinforcement of SiC microparticles and S­ i3N4
microparticles are shown in Fig. 4a, b respectively. The
EDS sprectrum reveals the presence of SiC microparticles
in Fig. 4a and presence of ­Si3N4 microparticles in Fig. 4b.

3.2 Effect of process parameters on tensile strength

The tensile test specimen and fractured tensile specimen


are shown in Fig. 5a, b. The effect of process parameters
(rotational speed, welding speed) on ultimate tensile
Fig. 1  The FSW tool strength and percentage elongation is presented in Figs. 6
and 7 respectively.
sand abrasion test to find the wear behavior of the joint.
The specimens for microstructure observation were pre- 3.3 Evaluation of microhardness variation
pared by using Keller’s reagent as etching reagent. The
distribution of silicon carbide was observed by scanning Vickers microhardness test was performed to measure the
electron microscopy (SEM) and the microstructure of vari- effect of reinforcement of SiC and S­ i3N4 microparticles in
ous regions was evaluated by optical microscopy. the welding zone. The samples possessing higher tensile
strength were selected for the microhardness test. Hard-
ness variation in the different welding zone like SZ, TMAZ,
3 Results and HAZ was observed from the result obtained through
Vickers microhardness test. Figure 8 shows the microhard-
3.1 Microstructure ness variation in the different zone for a welding speed of
56 mm/min and TRS of 1400 rpm.
The microstructural examination of the FSW weld reveals Figure 9 shows the microhardness variation in weld-
four distinct sections i.e. base metal (BM), heat-affected ing zone at welding speed of 112 mm/min and TRS of
zone (HAZ), thermomechanical-affected zone (TMAZ) and 1000 rpm at which higher tensile strength was observed.
stir zone (SZ). The typical microstructure of these regions The maximum tensile strength of the joint produced by
of the sample without any reinforcement having maxi- using silicon nitride as reinforcement was found at welding
mum tensile strength without reinforcement welded at a speed of 56 mm/min and TRS of 750 rpm so this sample

Table 1  Sample with specific Sample no. Welding speed/ RPM Tensile strength Powder used Specific wear rate
sand abrasion wear rate at (Avg) (mm3/N m)
sliding distance of 1046.15 m,
counter of 3000, wheel speed S1 56/1400 204.57 No 0.0223832
of 320 rpm and applied load
S2 80/1400 186.67 No 0.0324208
of 10 N
S3 112/1000 204.25 No 0.0253891
S4 56/1400 173.71 SiC 0.0191626
S5 80/1400 171.71 SiC 0.0142780
S6 112/1000 173.76 SiC 0.0098228
S7 56/750 171.43 Si3N4 0.0118089
S8 80/1000 163.71 Si3N4 0.0152979
S9 112/750 165.75 Si3N4 0.0141706

Vol:.(1234567890)
SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:1572 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03381-y Research Article

Fig. 2  Typical microstructure of friction stir welded joint without any reinforcement at welding speed of 112 mm/min and tool rotational
speed of 1000 rpm a BM, b HAZ, c TMAZ, d SZ

was also selected for microhardness evaluation as shown 4 Discussion


in Fig. 10.
It was observed that the low welding speed and higher
3.4 Effect on sand abrasion wear rate tool rotational speed provided a good amount of heat
for sound welding. From Fig. 6, the maximum tensile
Out of 27 samples, 9 samples were selected having a maxi- strength of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy welded joints with-
mum tensile strength in their respective group for the sand out the addition of powder was observed at two com-
abrasion test (3 samples from FSW without powder, 3 sam- binations of welding speed and tool rotational speed;
ple from FSW with silicon carbide powder, and 3 samples one at 56 mm/min, 1400 rpm and another at 112 mm/
from FSW with silicon nitride powder). Each standard test min and 1000 rpm. Hanapi et. al did similar experiments
was conducted for 1046.15 m of sliding distance. A multiple and observed the maximum tensile strength of nearly
of tests was conducted keeping constant parameters with 300 MPa. The difference in the result of this experiment
Counter of 3000, RPM of 210, Load of 10 N, and sliding dis- and the authors result was due to the thickness and pro-
tance: 1046.15 m (Fig. 11). cess parameters of the experiment that the author had
Specific wear rate of the selected samples is shown in taken [35]. Lakshminarayanan et. al [36] also performed
Table 1 and Fig. 12.

Vol.:(0123456789)
Research Article SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:1572 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03381-y

Fig. 3  Typical microstructure (optical and SEM image) of FSW joint at welding speed of 112 mm/min and tool rotational speed of 1000 rpm
a and b without using any reinforcement, c and d with SiC as reinforcement, e and f with S­ i3N4 as reinforcement

similar experiments and found that the maximum ten- a small value of around 31 MPa by adding SiC powder.
sile strength of FSW joint was around 240 MPa and the The tensile strength of the welding joints produced by
difference in result occurred due to the thickness of the using ­Si3N4 micropowder showed a totally different trend
plates, tool type and process parameter that author had and the maximum tensile strength of these joints was
taken. Exactly similar trends were observed in the weld- observed at welding speed of 56 mm/min and 750 rpm.
ing joint by using SiC micropowder. The maximum ten- The tensile strength was much lower as compared to the
sile strength of 173 MPa was observed at two combina- tensile strength of the joint without powder. The greater
tions of welding speed and tool rotational speed; one at decrement in tensile strength of the joints occurred
56 mm/min, 1400 rpm and another at 112 mm/min and due to bigger particle size of silicon nitrite which was
1000 rpm (Fig. 6). The tensile strength was decreased by envisioned to introduce brittleness in the joint. It was

Vol:.(1234567890)
SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:1572 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03381-y Research Article

The ductile properties of FSW joints of samples without


treatments were found to decrease with the reinforce-
ment of SiC and S­ i3N4 microparticles except at welding
parameter of 1400 rpm and 80 mm/min with the greater
reduction realized with silicon nitride microparticles.
The average microhardness value of as-obtained base
material (AA6061-T6) was HV108. It was observed from
Fig. 8 that for a welding speed of 56 mm/min and tool
rotational speed of 1400 rpm, the microhardness value in
the stir zone increased up to HV95 which was maximum
in case of silicon carbide as reinforcement. The micro-
hardness was also found to be enhanced with silicon
nitride reinforcement up to the maximum value of HV 85.
The microhardness in stir zone was about HV72 in case
of welding without any reinforcement. Abbasi et al. [37]
observed that when AZ31 Mg alloy was reinforced with
µSiC particles during friction stir welding, the SiC micro-
particles created pinning effect due to which grain growth
was retarded and hardness was increased. Karthikeyan and
Mahdevan [38] found that the addition of SiC particle in
the weld zone during FSW of AA6351 alloy increased the
microhardness of the welding zone. The higher hardness
realized with SiC microparticles can be attributed to the
Fig. 4  EDS spectrum of FSW joint with a µSiC reinforcement, b
µSi3N4 reinforcement higher hardness of SiC than ­Si3N4 and also the finer grain
size of SiC than ­Si3N4.
At welding speed of 112 mm/min and TRS of 1000 rpm,
observed from Fig. 7 that for the joint without reinforce- it was evident again that the microhardness of the joint
ment, the maximum percentage elongation of 7.39% and produced by reinforcing SiC microparticles was much
7.38% were realized at a welding speed of 56 mm/min higher with HV104 magnitude in the stir zone. Micro-
and TRS of 1400 rpm, and at welding speed of 112 mm/ hardness profile of joint produced by using silicon nitride
min and TRS of 1000 rpm respectively. At lower trans- microparticles did not reflect any appreciable improve-
verse speed, a high rotational speed provides sufficient ment in the hardness. The bigger size of silicon nitride
energy for meterial flow and produces sound welding. particles led to the formation of coarse grain in the stir

Fig. 5  Tensile test specimen a


before and b after fracture

Vol.:(0123456789)
Research Article SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:1572 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03381-y

120

100

80

Hardness (Hv)
Without Powder

60
With Silicon Carbide
40 Powder
With Silicon Nitride
20 Powder

0
BM -15 -12 -9 -6 -3 0 3 6 9 12 15 BM
Distance from weld center(mm)

Fig. 9  Hardness of FSW joint at welding speed of 112 mm/min and


1000 RPM

Fig. 6  Tensile strength of FSW joints zone which also dropped the microhardness value in the
welding zone.
At the welding speed of 56 mm/min and TRS of
750 rpm, the microhardness profile shown in Fig. 10 exhib-
ited that there was an improvement in the microhardness
of the stir zone and the hardness was greater when SiC
microparticles were used as reinforcement than the ­Si3N4
microparticles. The usage of silicon nitride reinforcement
also increased the hardness in the stir zone but the grains
produced were much coarser than with SiC reinforced FSW
joints.
The specific wear rate of the selected samples is shown
in Table 1 and Fig. 12. The lowest wear rate was observed
in the sample S6 and highest wear rate was observed
in the sample S2. Because of the smaller grain size and
higher hardness and better distribution of SiC particle, the
Fig. 7  Percentage Elongation of FSW joints
wear resistance of the FSW joint was improved. Uniform
distribution of SiC microparticle might also envisaged to
improve the wear resistance. Samples S7 produced by
120 FSW at 56 mm/min and 750 rpm using silicon nitride as
reinforcement expressed also highest wear resistance next
100
to S6 sample. In overall, the reinforcement of silicon car-
80 bide and silicon nitride significantly enhanced the wear
Hardness(Hv)

Without Powder
60
resistance of FSW joint with a minor sacrifice in the tensile
With Silicon Carbide strength and percentage elongation. Eftekharinia et.al [24]
40 Powder
also observed that the wear resistance was considerably
With Silicon Nitride
20 Powder
improved by addition of SiC particles because the higher
hardness of SiC particles led to lower material loss and
0
lower wear rate.
-15
-12

12
15
BM

BM
-9
-6
-3
0
3
6
9

Distance from welding center


From microstructure shown in Fig. 2a–d, condensed
grain structure was observed in the stir zone due to
Fig. 8  Hardness of FSW joint at welding speed of 56 mm/min and
recentralization in this zone. In the SZ, the large plas-
1400 RPM tic deformation and high temperatures led to dynamic
recrystallization due to which homogeneous and fine
grains were produced in this zone. The grains in the HAZ
and TMAZ were observed coarser due to the predomi-
nant consequence of friction heating. It can be observed

Vol:.(1234567890)
SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:1572 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03381-y Research Article

Fig. 10  Hardness of FSW joint


at welding speed of 56 mm/
min and 750 RPM

Fig. 11  Sand abrasion test


specimen a before wear test, b
after wear test

braking of agglomeration and dispersing the SiC parti-


cles. From optical and SEM image of FSW joint welded
with reinforcement of S­ i3N4 particles as shown in Fig. 3e,
f, it was observed that due to bigger particle size of S­ i3N4
particles presence, the dent was seen in the SEM image
which might lead to deterioration in tensile properties
of the friction stir welded joints.
From the SEM image of FSW joint without reinforce-
ment shown in Fig. 3b, the surface of SZ produced was
uniform and no dent or fracture was detected in the
sample which led to higher tensile strength. The SEM
image of the SZ welded with SiC reinforcement (Fig. 3d)
reflected that the surface structure was not as uniform
as the sample with no reinforcement and the presence
of uniform small dents led to a decrease in the tensile
strength of the FSW joint. From the SEM image of the SZ
Fig. 12  Specific wear rate of FSW samples welded with ­Si3N4 as reinforcement i.e. Fig. 3f, the sur-
face showed non-uniform structure and there were too
many dents present on the surfaces which transformed
from the Fig. 3c, d that SiC particles are uniformly dis- the structure matrix toward more brittle due to bigger
tributed in the stir zone. The square-shaped tool pin was size of ­Si3N4 particles which further led to a deterioration
envisioned to increase the material flow and also caused in the tensile strength of the joint.

Vol.:(0123456789)
Research Article SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:1572 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03381-y

5 Conclusions to investigate the effect of different nanoparticles rein-


forcements to arrive best microhardness and tribological
The aim of this research was to enhance the micro- properties with least or no sacrifice in tensile properties.
hardness and abrasive wear properties of AA6061-T6
aluminum alloy with minimum sacrifice in tensile prop-
erties at optimized FSW parameters for two different Compliance with ethical standards
microparticles reinforcements along the adjoining sur-
face. In the present study, AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy is Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
joined by friction stir welding with/without silicon car-
bide and silicon nitride microparticles reinforcement in
the welding zone. The tensile strength of the FSW joint References
without reinforcement was found to be maximum at two
combinations of the tool rotational speed and welding 1. Çam G, İpekoğlu G (2017) Recent developments in joining of
speed; one at 1400 rpm and 56 mm/min and other at aluminium alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(5–8):1851–1866
2. Çam G (2011) Friction stir welded structural materials: beyond
1000 rpm and 112 mm/min. The joint produced using Al-alloys. Int Mater Rev 56(1):1–48
µSiC as reinforcement showed exactly similar trend and 3. Patel VK, Rani K (2017) Mechanical and wear properties of fric-
exhibited maximum tensile strength at same welding tion stir welded 0–6Wt% ­nAl2O3 reinforced Al-13Wt% Si com-
parameters to that of without reinforcement but the posites. Strojnícky Casopis J Mech Eng 67:77–86
4. Patel VK, Kumar P, Bhattacharya S (2018) Mechanical, microstruc-
FSW joint produced with silicon nitride as reinforcement tural and sliding wear properties of friction stir welded AA6063-
showed a totally different trend due to bigger particle T6 and AA5052-H32 aluminium alloys. Mater Foc 7:50–58
size of silicon nitride. Tensile strength and percentage 5. Sen M, Shankar S, Chattopadhyaya S (2019) Micro-friction
elongation of the FSW joint were found to decrease by stir welding (µFSW ): a review. Mater Today Proc. https​://doi.
org/10.1016/j.matpr​.2019.09.220
adding µSiC and µSi3N4 as reinforcement and the decre- 6. Mishra D, Roy RB, Dutta S, Pal SK, Chakravarty D (2018) A review
ment in tensile properties with µ-Si3N4 was more than on sensor based monitoring and control of friction stir weld-
the FSW joint with µSiC reinforcement because the rein- ing process and a roadmap to Industry 4.0. J Manuf Process
forcement of µSi 3N4 caused coarser grain structure of 36:373–397
7. https​://www.alcot​ec.com/us/en/educa​tion/knowl​edge/qa/
welded zone than those samples with µSiC reinforce- The-Diffe​rence​s-Betwe​en-Heat-Treat​able-and-Non-Heat-Treat​
ment. The maximum tensile strength of FSW joint with- able-Alumi​num-Alloy​s.cfm
out any reinforcement, with µSiC reinforcement and with 8. Baghdadi AH, Rajabi A, Selamat NFM, Sajuri Z, Omar MZ (2019)
µSi3N4 reinforcement were measured to be 204.57 MPa, Effect of post-weld heat treatment on the mechanical behavior
and dislocation density of friction stir welded Al6061. Mater Sci
173.60 MPa, and 171.51 MPa respectively. Microhardness Eng A 754:728–734
of the FSW joint was increased by using SiC and ­Si3N4 9. Tao X, Chang Y, Guo Y, Li W, Li M (2018) Microstructure and
microparticle reinforcement due to the pinning effect mechanical properties of friction stir welded oxide dispersion
of hard particles reinforcements. The hardness of SZ was strengthened AA6063 aluminum matrix composites enhanced
by post-weld heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 725:19–27
found to increase from HV72 (without reinforcement) 10. İpekoğlu G, Erim S, Gören Kıral B, Çam G (2013) Investigation
to HV85 and HV95 with µSi3N4 and µSiC reinforcement into the effect of temper condition on friction stir weldability
respectively. The FSW joint produced by using reinforce- of AA6061 Al-Alloy plates. Kovove Mater 51(3):155–163
ment demonstrated a much lower abrasive wear rate as 11. İpekoğlu G, Erim S, Çam G (2014) Effects of temper condi-
tion and post weld heat treatment on the microstructure and
compared to the joints produced without any reinforce- mechanical properties of friction stir butt welded AA7075 Al-
ment. The reinforcement of SiC and S­ i3N4 microparticles alloy plates. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(1):201–213
served as load-bearing element and the reinforcement 12. İpekoğlu G, Çam G (2014) Effects of initial temper condition and
of SiC microparticles in FSW joints exhibited better postweld heat treatment on the properties of dissimilar fric-
tion-stir-welded joints between AA7075 and AA6061 aluminum
abrasive wear resistant properties than the FSW joint alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 45A(7):3074–3308
with µSi3N4 reinforcement. The bigger size of the rein- 13. İpekoğlu G, Erim S, Çam G (2014) Investigation into the influence
forcement particle led to the formation of brittle matrix of post-weld heat treatment on the friction stir welded AA6061
which was envisaged to decrease the tensile strength Al-alloy plates with different temper conditions. Metall Mater
Trans A 45A(2):864–877
and percentage elongation. Henceforth, it is envisioned 14. Liu Z, Xin R, Wu X, Liu D, Liu Q (2018) Improvement in the
from this research that the reinforcement of smaller and strength of friction-stir-welded ZK60 alloys via post-weld com-
harder particles addition along the contacting interface pression and aging treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 712:493–501
enhances the microhardness and wear resistant prop- 15. Singh S, Angra S (2019) Hygrothermal degradation of mechani-
cal properties of nanoclay based stainless steel and glass fibre-
erties with lesser sacrifice in tensile properties. This epoxy laminate. J Phys Conf Ser 1240:012164
further directs the research community a future vision 16. Choudhary S, Choudhary S, Vaish S, Upadhyay AK, Singla A,
Singh Y (2019) Effect of welding parameters on microstructure

Vol:.(1234567890)
SN Applied Sciences (2020) 2:1572 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03381-y Research Article

and mechanical properties of friction stir welded Al 6061 alu- butt welded joints by stationary shoulder friction stir welding.
minum alloy joints. Mater Today Proc. https​://doi.org/10.1016/j. Mater Des 64:251–260
matpr​.2019.05.466 29. Marzbanrad J, Akbari M, Asadi P, Safaee S (2014) Characteriza-
17. Kumar R, Singh K, Pandey S (2012) Process forces and heat input tion of the influence of tool pin profile on microstructural and
as function of process parameters in AA5083 friction stir welds. mechanical properties of friction stir welding. Metall Mater Trans
Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 22:288–298 B 45:1887–1894
18. Astarita A, Squillace A, Nele L (2016) Mechanical characteristics 30. Balasubramanian V (2008) Relationship between base metal
of welded joints of aluminum alloy 6061 T6 formed by ARC and properties and friction stir welding process parameters. Mater
friction stir welding. Met Sci Heat Treat 57:564–569 Sci Eng A 480:397–403
19. Hariri MB, Shiri SG, Yaghoubinezhad Y, Rahvard MM (2013) The 31. Rajakumar S, Muralidharan C, Balasubramanian V (2011) Pre-
optimum combination of tool rotation rate and traveling speed dicting tensile strength, hardness and corrosion rate of fric-
for obtaining the preferable corrosion behavior and mechanical tion stir welded AA6061-T6 aluminium alloy joints. Mater Des
properties of friction stir welded AA5052 aluminum alloy. Mater 32:2878–2890
Des 50:620–634 32. Rajakumar S, Muralidharan C, Balasubramanian V (2011)
20. Khodir SA, Shibayanagi T, Naka M (2006) Control of hardness Response surfaces and sensitivity analysis for friction stir welded
distribution in friction stir welded AA2024-T3 aluminum alloy. AA6061-T6 aluminium alloy joints. Int J Manuf Res 6:215–235
Mater Trans 47:1560–1567 33. Heidarzadeh A, Khodaverdizadeh H, Mahmoudi A, Nazari E
21. Upadhyay P, Reynolds A (2014) Effect of backing plate thermal (2012) Tensile behavior of friction stir welded AA 6061–T4 alu-
property on friction stir welding of 25-mm-thick AA6061. Metall minum alloy joints. Mater Des 37:166–173
Mater Trans A 45:2091–2100 34. ASTM E8 / E8M-13 (2013) Standard test methods for tension
22. Cam G, Mistikoglu S (2014) Recent developments in friction stir testing of metallic materials. ASTM International, West Consho-
welding of Al-alloys. J Mater Eng Perform 23:1936–1953 hocken, PA. www.astm.org
23. Jamshidi Aval H, Serajzadeh S, Kokabi AH (2011) Theoretical and 35. Mohd Hanapi MH, Hussain Z, Almanar IP, Abu Seman A (2016)
experimental investigation into friction stir welding of AA 5086. Optimization processing parameter of 6061–T6 alloy friction stir
Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:531–544 welded using Taguchi technique. Mater Sci Forum 840:294–298
24. Eftekharinia H, Amadeh AA, Khodabandeh A, Paidar M (2016) 36. Lakshminarayanan AK, Balasubramanian V, Elangovan K (2009)
Microstructure and wear behavior of AA6061/SiC surface com- Effect of welding processes on tensile properties of AA6061 alu-
posite fabricated via friction stir processing with different pins minium alloy joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40:286–296
and passes. Rare Met 39:1–7 37. Abbasi M, Abdollahzaden BB, Omidvar H (2015) The effect of SiC
25. Khalique EA, Nagesh BM, Raju BS, Drakshayani DN (2019) Stud- particle addition during FSW on microstructure and mechani-
ies on the effect of welding parameters for friction stir welded cal properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy. J Mater Eng Perform
AA6082 reinforced with Aluminium Oxide. Material Today Proc. 24:5037–5045
https​://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr​.2019.10.059 38. Karthikeyan P, Mahadevan K (2013) Investigation on the effects
26. Marzoli LM, Strombeck AV, Dos Santos JF, Gambaro C, Volpone of SiC particle addition in the weld zone during friction stir
LM (2006) Friction stir welding of an AA6061/Al2O3/20p rein- welding of Al 6351 alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:1919–1926
forced alloy. Compos Sci Technol 66:363–371
27. Kumar P, Sukhomay S, Qingyu P (2019) Effect of solid solution Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
phase constitution on dissimilar Al/Cu FSW using Zn as an alloy- jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ing element at the joint interface SN. Appl Sci 1:1659
28. Li D, Yang X, Cui L, He F, Shen H (2014) Effect of welding parame-
ters on microstructure and mechanical properties of AA6061-T6

Vol.:(0123456789)

You might also like