Power System Protection Lecture 5 Annotated
Power System Protection Lecture 5 Annotated
Power System Protection Lecture 5 Annotated
Lecture 5
Dr. Fattahi
Components of a Transmission Line Protection System
Dr. Fattahi
Current Transformer (CT)
Dr. Fattahi
current transformers (CTs)
Vknee
Excitation voltage
P
Iknee 1.5 Iknee
Magnetizing current
P = Operating point of protective CT
M = Operating point of measurement CT
Dr. Fattahi
CT in a HV Substation
Dr. Fattahi
Equivalent Circuit and Current Transformer Performance
The primary winding of the CT is connected in series with the power network, leading to the determination of its primary
current 10 by the network’s characteristics. Consequently, the influence of the primary winding’s leakage impedance / G1 0 on
the transformer’s performance is negligible and can be disregarded. Utilizing the turns ratio (n:1) of the ideal transformer,
the following relationships hold:
0
1
1 =
=
0 2
/< = = /<
The load impedance /1 encompasses the impedance of connected relays, meters in the secondary winding, and the
connecting leads between the CT’s secondary winding terminals in the substation yard and the protection equipment located
in the control house.
Dr. Fattahi
Equivalent Circuit and Current Transformer Performance
Frequently, the lead impedance constitutes a significant portion of the total load impedance. The CT burden can be
expressed as /1 ⌦ or as a burden of 2 /1 VA. If the rated secondary current is 5 A, the specified burden equates to 25/1
volt-amperes.
Referring to the phasor diagram,
The voltage ⇢< across the magnetizing impedance /< is given by: ⇢< = ⇢1 + / G2 2
The magnetizing current < is given by: < = ⇢ <
/<
The primary current 1 , when referred to the secondary winding, is given by: 1 = 2 + <
For small burden impedance values, both ⇢1 and ⇢< are small, resulting in a small < . The per unit current transformation
error n defined as:
1 2 <
n = =
1 1
is consequently small for low /1 values.
Dr. Fattahi
Equivalent Circuit and Current Transformer Performance
In essence, CTs perform optimally when connected to very low impedance burdens. In the extreme case of zero burden
impedance (and small / G2 ), 1 = 2 , leading to zero CT error.
Often, the CT error is presented in terms of a ratio correction factor ' instead of the per unit error n . The ratio correction
factor ' is defined as the constant by which the nameplate turns ratio = of a current transformer must be multiplied to obtain
the effective turns ratio. It holds that:
1
'=
1 n
While n and ' can be complex numbers, there are cases where they are used as real numbers equal to their respective
magnitudes, which is an approximation but not overly inaccurate.
Dr. Fattahi
Example
Dr. Fattahi
the ratio correction factor. The procedure is illustrated by Example 3.2 and one of the problems at
brary on [31/08/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
CT Nonlinear Characteristics
the end of the chapter. As can be seen from these problems, the calculation of CT performance
with nonlinear magnetizing characteristic is a fairly complicated procedure. A much simpler and
approximate procedure is available with the help of the standard class designations described next.
Notice that Figure 3.3 contains a family of characteristics. Each CT may be provided with several
taps, which can be used to obtain a turns ratio that is most convenient in a given application. The
20
in determining the factor ' for a specific 10
scenario. 5
3
I Magnetizing Characteristic: A practical CT’s 2
plot depicts r.m.s. magnetizing current versus Secondary exciting current amps (rms)
r.m.s. secondary voltage, serving as a vital Figure 3.3 Magnetizing characteristic of a typical CT
reference.
I < and Ratio Correction: To calculate the
ratio correction factor, < for each ⇢< must
be extracted from the curve. This data then
aids in the determination of the required ratio
correction factor.
Dr. Fattahi
Current Transformer Analysis: Thévenin Equivalent Approach
Let’s examine a CT with a turns ratio of 600:5 and the corresponding magnetizing characteristic. Our objective is to
determine the secondary winding current when the primary current is 5000 A.
Considering a total burden impedance of 9 + 92 W and negligible secondary leakage impedance, and knowing the impedance
angle of the magnetizing branch is 60°, we model the equivalent circuit.
We approximate it as a linear part containing a current source of 41.66 A (derived from 5000(5/600)) in parallel with the
burden, connected across the nonlinear impedance /< . The corresponding Thevenin equivalent is a voltage source of
384.1\12.53° volts (calculated as 41.66 ⇥ (9 + 92)), in series with the burden.
The magnetizing current < and secondary voltage ⇢2 can be expressed in terms of | /< |:
384.1
< =
| /< | ⇥ (0.5 + 90.866) + (9.0 + 92.0)
⇢2 = < /<
These equations can be solved to yield ⇢2 and < in terms of | /< |.
Dr. Fattahi
Since the magnetizing branch of a practical transformer is nonlinear, Zm is not constant, and
the actual excitation characteristic of the transformer must be taken into account in determining
the factor R for a given situation. The magnetizing characteristic of a typical CT is shown in
Figure 3.3. This being a plot of the r.m.s. magnetizing current versus the r.m.s. secondary voltage,
Im for each Em must be obtained from this curve, and then used in equations (3.5)–(3.7) to calculate
the ratio correction factor. The procedure is illustrated by Example 3.2 and one of the problems at
the end of the chapter. As can be seen from these problems, the calculation of CT performance
with nonlinear magnetizing characteristic is a fairly complicated procedure. A much simpler and
approximate procedure is available with the help of the standard class designations described next.
Notice that Figure 3.3 contains a family of characteristics. Each CT may be provided with several
taps, which can be used to obtain a turns ratio that is most convenient in a given application. The
1000 CT ratio
1200:5
500 1000:5
900:5
800:5
300 600:5
500:5
Secondary voltage volts (rms)
200 400:5
300:5
100
200:5
50
30 100:5
20
10
5
CT Nonlinear Characteristics
3
2
1
0.001 0.003 0.01 0.03 0.1 0.3 1.0 3.0 10.0 30.0 100.0
Secondary exciting current amps (rms)
Figure 3.3 Magnetizing characteristic of a typical CT
1 = 41.66\0 (with corresponding Thevenin voltage
The CT magnetizing characteristic can be found as
0.408\ 29.96°,
°
< = 17\
I =
Dr. Fattahi
voltage transformer (VT)
Dr. Fattahi
PT in a HV Substation
Dr. Fattahi
Circuit breaker (CB)
Dr. Fattahi
Circuit breaker (CB)
Dr. Fattahi