Ramaswamy 2002
Ramaswamy 2002
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhmt
a
IBM Corporation, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533, USA
b
G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
c
ThermTech International, Kanagawa, 255-0004, Japan
d
Laboratory for Physical Sciences, College Park, MD 20740, USA
Received 14 January 2002; received in revised form 16 May 2002
Abstract
Using high-speed photography (1500 frames/s) bubble growth data on microporous structures immersed in a pool of
dielectric coolant (FC-72) were obtained. Wafer dicing and wet etching was used to fabricate a net of interconnected
microchannels on a 10 mm 10 mm piece of silicon wafer. The resultant structure has pores that communicate the
interior of microchannels to the liquid pool. The pore diameter was varied in a range 0.12–0.20 mm and the pore pitch
in 0.7–1.4 mm. The data were collected maintaining the system pressure at one atmosphere and increasing the wall
superheat up to 12 K.
Among the geometrical parameters, the pore diameter was found to be most influential on the bubble departure
diameter. The findings about the bubble growth rate, the bubbling frequency, and the bubble site density were largely in
accord with the previously reported data. However, the coverage of wider ranges of wall superheat and the structural
parameters in the present study revealed new bubble characteristics that was used in implementing an analytical model
for boiling heat transfer on the porous structure.
Ó 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Nomenclature
length and diameter in the range 0.125–2 mm. Four There is sufficient evidence in literature demonstrating
different organic liquids: acetone, methanol, benzene the very high heat transfer rates (100 W/cm2 ) achiev-
and isopropanol were used. The emphasis of the study able with enhanced surfaces (see Webb [6]). However,
was to understand the vapor and liquid interaction at studies on understanding the mechanism of boiling from
critical heat flux. A correlation was derived to predict these surfaces are limited. Nakayama et al. [7–9] were
the thickness of the vapor blanket layer for this state. among the first to carry out visualization of the boiling
Katto and Yakoya [5] studied the boiling of saturated process from a structured surface. The surface consisted
water at one atmosphere from a horizontal, 10 mm di- of a rectangular channel covered with a thin sheet that
ameter, heated disc. They found that the vapor mass had pores at a regular pitch (Fig. 1) and the entire
above the heated surface can be classified into three structure was immersed in R-11. They used a laser probe
categories depending on the influence between consec- to measure the frequency of bubble formation and the
utive bubbles. In the first category, consecutive vapor population density of the bubbles. They found that
masses are independent of each other. In the second, the liquid in the channel evaporated to form vapor regions,
growing vapor mass is almost attached to the preceding which were then ejected as bubbles from the pores. As
one and is much smaller in size. The final category the bubbles ejected, liquid filled into the channels
consists of vapor masses that are separated from the through the pores and spread axially along thin menisci
preceding one but grow under the influence of the flow along the sharp corners of the channel. With addition of
generated by the preceding one and are almost columnar heat, the frequency of bubbles and the number of bub-
in shape. bles increased, but the basic phenomenon remained the
The above mentioned studies and similar ones in same. An analytical model was formulated to predict a
literature are mostly for plain polished surfaces only. few of these parameters.
Fig. 3. Top view of microfabricated enhanced structures (a) wet-etched (b) wafer-diced.
3. Experimental set-up
Table 1
Enhanced structures employed in the visualization A schematic of the test facility is shown in Fig. 4. The
Structure Channel Channel Channel Thickness test set-up consists of evaporator and condenser sections
identification width, pitch, Pt height, of structure, separated by flexible poly-fluoro-alkoxy tubing with an
number Wt (mm) (mm) Ht (mm) Hs (mm) internal diameter of 3.2 mm. This provides a ther-
S-0.20-1.0-W 0.20 1.0 0.26 0.50 mosyphon loop with the condenser placed at a higher
S-0.20-0.7-D 0.20 0.7 0.26 0.51 elevation compared to the evaporator for liquid return
S-0.15-1.4-D 0.15 1.4 0.26 0.51 by gravity. Fig. 4 also shows a detailed sketch of the
S-0.15-0.7-D 0.15 0.7 0.26 0.51 evaporator section. The evaporator consists of a plexi-
S-0.12-0.7-D 0.12 0.7 0.26 0.51 glass enclosure (12.7 mm thick walls) of outside
D: wafer dicing; W: wet chemical etching. dimensions 50 mm 50 mm 40 mm. The heater as-
sembly consists of an Omega cartridge heater embedded
Fig. 4. Schematic of the experimental set-up (a) thermosyphon loop, (b) detailed view of the evaporator section.
C. Ramaswamy et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 45 (2002) 4761–4771 4765
into a square copper rod (1.1 cm2 cross-sectional area). structure. The lens was capable of a variable magnifi-
Omegathermâ ‘‘201’’ high thermal conductivity, high cation of 1–6.5 times the original size of the object. A
temperature paste was applied between the heater and 150 W fiber optic light guide was used for illuminating
the copper rod for good contact. The copper rod was the structure.
insulated with plexiglass and additional styrofoam in-
sulation to minimize heat loss. The enhanced structure
was soldered to one end of this heater assembly. 4. Experimental procedure
Four copper–constantan sheathed thermocouples
(0.08 mm diameter) were embedded at the center of the Every experimental run was preceded by a degassing
copper rod starting from 4 mm below the boiling surface operation. The vent valve was opened and a heat input
at intervals of 4 mm. These thermocouples were used to of 70 W was supplied to the heater (to start vigorous
calculate the heat flux at the base of the enhanced boiling). Boiling was sustained for about 1 h and then
structure (1 cm2 ) by a one-dimensional heat conduction the system was allowed to cool down for 2 h. The vent
analysis. Pool temperature in the evaporator section was valve was kept closed during this period. The system
measured using an embedded copper–constantan ther- reached room temperature by this time in all the runs.
mocouple of 0.08 mm diameter. The thermocouple Before commencement of the test runs, the valve was
measurements were acquired using a National Instru- again opened to ensure atmospheric conditions inside
ments data acquisition system interfaced to a personal the system at all heat input levels. This procedure en-
computer and controlled using LabVIEW software. sured that the dissolved gas concentration of non-con-
A variac (0–140 V) supplied power to the heater. densibles was uniform, if not zero, in all the runs.
Voltage taps were placed on the heater lead wires very The initial heat input was set at 1 W and incremented
near the sheath. This provided precise measurement of in steps of 1 W until boiling was observed. Subsequently,
voltage drop across the heater. A precision resistor the increments were increased to 2.5 W. The image cap-
(1 0:01 X) was connected in series to the power supply ture was carried out along with the temperature mea-
to measure the line current. A Fluke 87 True RMS surements. For each value of power input, the system
multimeter measured the voltages. was allowed to reach steady state (defined by a rise of less
A plate fin condenser was employed with the fin than 0.2 °C in a span of 10 min). The image capture
spacing of 6 mm optimized for operation in natural software was used to start the capture and 500 images
convection. A Robinair pressure gauge ()101 kPa to 0.8 were acquired sequentially at a speed of 1500 frames/s
MPa) was attached to the loop near the exit of the (4:1 aspect ratio). The capture sequence was replayed and
condenser to monitor the loop pressure during operation the number of images to be stored adjusted to capture at
and during leak test of the set-up (in vacuum and under least 10 cycles of bubble growth and departure. The
pressure). An ice cooled spiral tube reflux condenser was images were then transferred to permanent storage on
used to trap any vapor leaving the condenser. It also the computer. The temperatures were then recorded at
provided a vent for the system to maintain it at atmo- two-second intervals for 1 min. The averaged values were
spheric pressure throughout the tests. used to calculate the temperature gradient and the heat
The flow visualization set-up consisted of a high- input. The voltages across the heater and the precision
speed CCD camera (model––Phantom) capable of frame resistor were recorded during the data acquisition and
rates up to 1600 frames/s with a split field. The CCD used to calculate the electrical input to the system.
image size was 512 pixels across by 512 pixels. With an This procedure was repeated at each heat flux until
aspect ratio of 1:1 a maximum of 500 frames/s was the liquid inside the evaporator was agitated so vigor-
captured. Setting the aspect ratio to 2:1 gave two sub- ously (because of bubble generation) that the captured
fields for each normal field, allowing two times the frames did not provide any meaningful pictures. The
number of images (of half the height). This resulted in magnification was kept fixed for each experimental run
1000 images of 512 pixels across by 256 pixels (at the (depending on the channel size). The images were ana-
same 500 frames/s speed). The camera had a personal lyzed using the image analysis software provided by the
computer integrated into it, which was used to control camera vendor (Phantom) and the parameters measured
the capturing and storing of images. The camera vendor were bubble departure diameter, frequency and growth
(Vision Systems, Inc.) supplied the front-end software, period. The nucleation site density was measured by
which was used to control the capture sequence. The direct observation.
input parameters were speed of capture, number of
frames to store after triggering the capture and the as-
pect ratio of the image. An instant replay allowed re- 5. Measurements and uncertainty analysis
viewing the captured images in slow motion.
A zoom lens (Navitar 6000) was used to magnify the The thermocouples and the data acquisition system
area of interest and work at close distances to the boiling were calibrated against a precision mercury thermometer
4766 C. Ramaswamy et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 45 (2002) 4761–4771
6. Experimental results
Fig. 7. Average bubble departure diameter vs. wall superheat. Fig. 8. Average frequency vs. wall superheat.
4768 C. Ramaswamy et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 45 (2002) 4761–4771
Sample pictures of a bubble cycle (from beginning to Fig. 10. Instantaneous bubble diameters (a) ‘S-0.15-1.4-D’,
end) are shown in Fig. 9. The instantaneous bubble di- DTsup ¼ 7.3 °C, (b) ‘S-0.2-1.0-W’, DTsup ¼ 5.3 °C.
ameters were plotted as a function of time. Two cases
are presented in Fig. 10. The results show a nearly linear
growth rate. The growth rate from plain surfaces is transfer controlled phase where the bubble grows [20].
usually divided into two phases––an inertia driven phase The inertia driven phase is typically significantly smaller
where the bubble initiation takes place, and a heat than the heat transfer controlled phase and most studies
Fig. 9. Bubbles growing at a pore for structure S-0.15-1.4-D, DTsup ¼ 7:3 °C.
C. Ramaswamy et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 45 (2002) 4761–4771 4769
assume that the entire growth period is heat transfer because of an increase in the amount of liquid evapo-
controlled. For the inertia driven phase, the instanta- rated in the tunnels.
neous diameter varies linearly with time. On the other The results also show that as the pore pitch was in-
hand, for the heat transfer controlled regime, the vari- creased, the nucleation density decreases. With an in-
ation is proportional to the square root of time. The crease in the pitch, the number of pores on the surface is
current study shows that the mechanism of bubble reduced and hence the nucleation density is also smaller.
growth is indeed different from that on plain surfaces
and is inertia driven for the entire growth period (linear
with time). This confirms the findings of Chien and 7. Framework for semi-analytical model
Webb [11] who made a similar observation with their
structured surface. A semi-empirical model for prediction of heat
transfer rates from the enhanced structure was devel-
6.5. Nucleation site density oped that used the bubble data recorded above. Fig. 12
shows how the measured data and the other boiling
The number of bubbles generated on the surface was parameters feed into each other to form a semi-analyt-
calculated by direct observation. Since the pores on all ical model. Sub-models for the bubble departure diam-
the structures were on a square grid, the number of eter, frequency and nucleation site density have been
bubbles generated at the outermost rows (or columns) developed in conjunction with a correlation for liquid
shadowed the ones generated at the center. Hence an evaporation inside the channels [19]. The semi-analytical
approximate method was used to calculate the number model predicts the total heat transfer rate at a certain
of bubbles. The number of bubbles on the outermost wall superheat.
rows was first recorded (by viewing the front and back Fig. 13 shows the comparison between measured
of the structure). An average value was thus calculated data and prediction based on this model, for a few
for number of bubbles generated per row. Next, the structures (Table 2). The predicted results for heat flux
number of active rows was recorded by viewing the are within 30% of the experimental ones. Details on
structure from the sides (left and right). The total prediction accuracy of the sub-models are included in
number of bubbles was evaluated by multiplying the two the accompanying paper [19]. Accurate prediction of the
numbers. The nucleation site density was evaluated by evaporation inside the channels seems to be the most
dividing the number of bubbles generated by the exter- dominant factor in the efficacy of the model.
nal surface area of the structure.
The resulting nucleation site density is plotted as a
function of wall superheat in Fig. 11. The results show
that the number of bubbles formed increases with an
increase in the wall superheat. For plain surfaces, this
phenomenon occurs because sites with larger cavity sizes
get activated with an increase in wall superheat. For the
structured surfaces, the cavity size is fixed (by the pore
size) and hence the increase in number of bubbles occurs
[8] W. Nakayama, T. Daikoku, H. Kuwahara, T. Nakajima, [14] C. Ramaswamy, A compact two-phase thermosyphon emp-
Dynamic model of enhanced boiling heat transfer on loying microfabricated boiling enhancement structures, Ph.D.
porous surfaces, part II: analytical modeling, J. Heat Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 1999.
Transfer 102 (1980) 451–456. [15] S.J. Kline, F.A. McClintock, Describing uncertainties in
[9] W. Nakayama, T. Daikoku, T. Nakajima, Effects of pore single sample experiments, Mech. Eng. 75 (1953) 3–8.
diameters and system pressure on saturated pool boiling [16] N. Zuber, Nucleate boiling––the region of isolated bub-
heat transfer from porous surfaces, J. Heat Transfer 104 bles––similarity with natural convection, Int. J. Heat Mass
(1982) 286–291. Transfer 6 (1963) 53–56.
[10] J. Arshad, J.R. Thome, Enhanced boiling surfaces: heat [17] N.I. Kolev, The influence of mutual bubble interaction on
transfer mechanism and mixture boiling, in: Proceedings of the bubble departure diameter, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 8
ASME-JSME Thermal Engineering Joint Conference, vol. (1994) 167–174.
1, 1983, pp. 191–197. [18] G. Fournelle, S.H. Bhavnani, R.C. Jaegar, Optical Study
[11] L.-H. Chien, R.L. Webb, Measurement of bubble dynam- of Enhanced Heat Transfer from a Heat Sink for Micro-
ics on an enhanced boiling surface, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. electronic Applications, in: D. Agonafer, M. Saka, Y.-C.
16 (3) (1998) 177–186. Lee (Eds.), Advances in Electronic Packaging,, EEP-Vol.
[12] W. Nakayama, T. Nakajima, S. Hirasawa, Heat sink studs 26-2, 1999.
having enhanced boiling surfaces for cooling microelec- [19] C. Ramaswamy, Y. Joshi, W. Nakayama, W.B. Johnson,
tronic components, ASME Paper No.84-WA/HT-89, Semi-analytical model for boiling from enhanced struc-
1984. tures, Int. J. Heat and Mass Transfer, submitted for
[13] C. Ramaswamy, Y. Joshi, W. Nakayama, W.B. Johnson, publication.
Compact thermosyphons employing microfabricated com- [20] B.B. Mikic, W.M. Rohsenow, A new correlation of pool-
ponents, Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 3 (4) (1999) 273– boiling data including the effect of heating surface charac-
282. teristics, J. Heat Transfer 91 (1969) 245–250.