Appendix Giv Geotechnical Investigation Report Yates Jones 2014
Appendix Giv Geotechnical Investigation Report Yates Jones 2014
Appendix Giv Geotechnical Investigation Report Yates Jones 2014
FOR
FOR
AECOM
CONTACT DETAILS
Tel: +27 21 671 4274/80 Fax: +27 21 671 4277 email: [email protected]
Postal address: Postnet Suite 177, Private Bag X3, Pumstead, 7801, Cape Town
Physical address: Unit b02, Clareview Business Park, 236 Imam Haron Road, Claremont, 7708, Cape Town, South Africa
PHASE I GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION FOR
SIR LOWRY'S PASS VILLAGE
Appendix A: Site Plan and Site Class Designation, Figures 3.1 & 3.2
Appendix B: Test Pit Soil Profiles
Appendix C: DPL probe test results
Appendix D: Laboratory Test Results
PHASE I & II GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION FOR
SIR LOWRY'S PASS VILLAGE
for
AECOM
September 2014 Project no: 149-14
Executive Summary
The area of investigation comprises two portions of land, approximately 8.5 Ha and 3.7 Ha in extent.
These areas are located to the west and east of Sir Lowry's Pass Village respectively. Topographically,
the western site has a general fall from the north towards the south and the eastern site has a fall from
the east to the west. A stream is located just south of the western site together with a man-made dam in
the central portion of the site. The eastern site is located on an elevated hill area.
Regionally the area is underlain from surface by Recent unconsolidated sandy and gravelly deposits of
alluvial and colluvial (transported) origin. Residual and weathered shales of the Malmesbury Group
underlie the transported soils together with granites of the Cape Granite Suite, mostly on the eastern
site.
The water table was encountered within all test pits except for three (test pits TP9, TP11 and TP12) on
the western site and within only two test pits on the eastern site (TP15 and TP17). It appears that
groundwater generally occurs within a gravelly alluvial horizon, and is perched above the underlying less
permeable clayey residual shale horizons. Perched groundwater water generally occurs at depths
ranging from surface to approximately 1.6 m, while on the eastern site, perched water is intersected at
between 0.3 m to 0.9 m depth below surface, where it accumulates over the less permeable residual
granites.
The following geotechnical characteristics of the site are expected to have an impact on subsidy housing
development and subsidy variations:-
• Potentially expansive founding conditions in the clayey residual shale/granite portions of the site
• Perched groundwater within 1.0 m of ground surface on the western area
• Boulder excavation within 1.5 m of surface on both areas
A schedule of generic subsidy variations applicable to the site is outlined in Table 6.3.
The Residential Site Class Designations (after Watermeyer & Tromp and the Joint Structural Division) are
set out in Table 7.1. The areal extent of classified areas is shown in the site plans in Appendix A. The
site classifications for the western site are S1/H and S2/H1. The entire eastern site is classified as S1/H.
Structures may be founded according to site class designations using the following founding options:
Western area:
a) Stiffened concrete raft foundations on transported sands and engineered fill with a bearing
pressure of 80 kPa.
b) On stiff residual clayey silts, pedogenic calcrete or dense transported cobbles and boulders
using strip footings or piers and ground beams at an average depth of 1.3 m. Bearing pressures
of up to 120 kPa are applicable.
1. Introduction
At the request of Mr David Naude of AECOM, we have carried out a Phase 1 Geotechnical Site
Investigation for the proposed housing development near Sir Lowry's Pass Village.
The objectives of this investigation were as follows: -
a) Identify any potential hazards
b) Define the ground conditions and provide site classifications including detailed soil profiles and
groundwater occurrences within the zone of influence of foundations
c) Provide the geotechnical basis for safe and appropriate land use planning, infrastructure
design, housing unit design and the formulation of precautionary measures and risk
management procedures
d) Broadly classify the land that is to be developed for subsidy housing in terms of the Housing
Code's Residential Site Class Designations
e) Gather factual data that has a bearing on the determination of housing subsidy variations and
the installation of township services.
This report has been prepared in accordance with the standard specifications of the National
Housing Code for Project Linked Greenfield Subsidy Housing Projects (Standard Specification
GFSH-2).
3. Site description
The area of investigation comprises two portions of land, approximately 8.5 Ha and 3.7 Ha in
extent, these areas are located to the west and east of Sir Lowry's Pass Village respectively. The
locations of the sites are indicated in the the locality plan, Figure 3.1.
Topographically, the western site has a general fall from the north towards the south and the eastern
site has a fall from the east to the west. A stream is located just south of the western site together
with a man-made dam in the central portion of the site and the eastern site is located on a elevated
hill area. Figure 3.2 depicts the physiological features on the site.
The western site consists almost entirely of farm lands, which have been used as pastures for cattle
and horses. Old farm houses, barns and outbuildings form an “L” shape in the central portion of
the site and vegetation generally consists of grasslands with rows of larger trees, presumably planted
4. Nature of investigation
4.1 Test pits and dynamic probe light (DPL) testing
The following field work was carried out: -
a) Seventeen test pits (test pits TP1-TP17 inclusive), located across the site where access would
allow, were excavated using a digger-loader to expose the soil profile. All test pits were visually
profiled, with representative soil samples being taken from selected horizons for laboratory
testing purposes
b) Dynamic probe light (DPL) tests at selected locations to determine soil consistencies with
depth
Test pit and DPL probe test positions are shown on the site plans included in Appendix A. Copies
of the recorded soil profiles and DPL tests are included in Appendices B and C respectively.
4.2 Laboratory testing
The following laboratory tests were carried out on selected soil samples: -
a) Indicator tests in the form of grading and Atterberg Limits analyses to determine basic soils
engineering properties.
b) Moisture-density with CBR strength testing to determine compaction and strength properties of
recompacted soils.
b) Geochemical testing (pH and conductivity) to indicate possible deleterious effects of soils on
concrete and buried services.
Copies of the full laboratory test results are included in Appendix D.
6. Geotechnical evaluation
6.1 Engineering and material characteristics
On the basis of the desk study, the available geotechnical investigation information and the
laboratory test results summarized in Table 6.1 and Table 6.2, the following points relating to site
geotechnical conditions and constraints, may be made:-
Western area:
a) The near-surface colluvial soil material is loose and compressible, contains variable clay/silt
content and varies in thickness throughout the site. This material is unsuitable for founding
purposes.
b) The medium dense transported gravelly soils have moderate post-compaction strength, where
they are classified as G6 materials (See Table 6.2). These soils will be suitable as a load bearing
horizon, provided there is some form of ground improvement.
c) The residual shale/siltstone exhibits low to moderate compressibility and plasticity with a PI of
between 8 and 10, which we believe is lower that what is normally expected in these soils.
Post-compaction strength is expected to be low. Poor workability and drainage characteristics
make these soils unsuitable for use in construction. Although these soils have a potential for
low to moderate heave movements, they will be suitable for use as a load-bearing founding
horizon, provided foundations are in material of a stiff consistency and that appropriate design
precautions, to accommodate potential heave movements, are implemented
Conduc
Test Depth Material tivity CBR at 93% Mod
Pit (m) Description LL PI LS MC GM pH (mS/m) AASHTO
1 0.5 Transported SP SP SP - 1.6 6.3 21 27
gravelly silty
sand
2 0.2 Residual clayey 40 8 5.0 25.5 0.26 - - -
silty shale
5 1.2 Residual clayey 34 8 5.0 20.6 0.29 5.4 13 -
silty shale
7 0.7 Residual silty 33 10 5.0 18.4 0.22 - -
clay shale
9 0.3 Transported 21 4 2.0 - 2.58 - - 26
silty gravel
13 1.0 Residual clayey 33 8 5.0 15.8 1.09 3.8 17 -
sand granite
15 0.5 Transported 23 4 2.0 - 2.20 4.6 15 54
gravelly sand
Key: LL – liquid limit. PI – plasticity index. LS - linear shrinkage. S-P – slightly plastic. MC – in-situ moisture content. GM
– grading modulus. CBR – California bearing ratio. (* computed CBR value).
c) Excavation problems that may be anticipated within the transported soils or residual granites
are possibly boulder/core-stone excavation. These soils, however, generally classify as “soft”
excavation and should be possible using digger loader type machinery. If less weathered
granite rock/pedogenic horizons are intersected at depth then excavation within these
materials may require the use of heavier plant such as excavators equipped with rock buckets.
7. Site classification
The Residential Site Class Designation (after Watermeyer & Tromp and the Joint Structural Division)
is set out in Table 7.1. The areal extent of classified areas is shown in the site plan in Appendix A.
Three site class designations are identified due to the inherent variability in the soil/geological
conditions.
The site class designations for the western site are S1/H and S2/H1. While the eastern site is
classified as S1/H.
Table 7.1 Residential Site Class Designations
9. Drainage
In view of the potentially expansive nature of the residual shales, as well as the risk associated with
storm water run-off due to slopes and low permeable soils, sound water management is required.
Close attention to drainage and the effective collection and disposal of storm water run-off is
required throughout the site as part of surface erosion management. Surface water should be
drained/deviated in a herringbone type layout to best intersect water flow paths and deep cut off
drains upslope should also be considered. Maintenance of these systems will be required
throughout their lifespan. The planting of vegetation in undeveloped areas should also help
prevent the formation of erosion channels down slope.
Roads should also be constructed with adequate drainage to minimize the possible effects of
seasonal shallow perched ground water and surface water run-off and to prevent deterioration of
11. Conclusions
This Phase 1 geotechnical site investigation indicates that the site is broadly suitable for project
linked subsidy housing development, provided that aspects of concern relating to the geotechnical
character of the site are addressed. These have been outlined in the report.
JOHN YATES
MATTHEW JONES