Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Guide For The Development of The Practical Component - Unit 2 - Phase 3 - Practical Component - Educational and Pedagogical Practice

    Uploaded by

    Carolina Torres
    teacher development

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Guide For The Development of The Practical Component - Unit 2 - Phase 3 - Practical Component - Educational and Pedagogical Practice

    Uploaded by

    Carolina Torres
    2 views9 pages
    teacher development

    Original Title

    Guide for the Development of the Practical Component - Unit 2 - Phase 3 - Practical Component - Educational and Pedagogical Practice

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    teacher development

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    2 views9 pages

    Guide For The Development of The Practical Component - Unit 2 - Phase 3 - Practical Component - Educational and Pedagogical Practice

    Uploaded by

    Carolina Torres
    teacher development

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 9

    Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

    Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación


    Unique Guide for the Development of the Practical Component of the Course:
    Teacher Development
    Code: 518021

    1. General Information of the Practical Component

    Learning strategy: Research-Based Learning (RBL)


    Course type: Methodological
    Evaluation moment: Intermediate
    Highest score of the component: 350 points
    Number of activities of the practical component registered in this guide: 1
    With the development of this component students are expected to achieve the
    following learning outcomes:

    Develop peer-observation and critical incident as a strategy for the improvement of


    the teaching professional practice

    2. General Activity Description of the Practical Component.

    Scenarios of the practical component: In situ (practice)


    Activity type: Individual
    Activity number: 1
    Highest score of the activity: 140 points
    The activity starts on: Tuesday, March The activity ends on: Sunday, April 21,
    26, 2024 2024
    The resources required for the development of this activity are the
    following:
    • E-mail
    • Virtual campus
    • Pedagogical and Educational Practice Simulator
    • Student’s e-portfolio
    • Forms for the traceability of pedagogical and educational practice
    The activity consists of:

    Step 1 – Reading

    1
    Read the references of Unit 2 you can find in the learning environment, and in the
    syllabus.

    Step 2 - Class Recording class – Meaningful experience

    1. Record a video of the classes taught as a micro teaching style for up to 30 – 45


    minutes and post it in the collaborative forum until April 14th or if you can do it
    previously better,this way your mates can give feedback on time. This video
    recording must be different from the one you delivered for the task 2. You must
    identify in your students specific learning needs in reading, writing, speaking or
    listening. Then you are going to apply a method, strategy or technique that is
    impacting their students' learning. (You have to complete the template –
    meaningful teaching experience) You find it in the file activity guide.

    Step 3: Observation Worksheet

    Choose another partner’s video recording and apply the Observation Worksheet and
    post it in the collaborative forum. Remember the indications for the recording in the
    task 2.

    Step 4: Critical incident

    Watch the OVA “critical incidents” from Unit 2 and answer the activities. Think in a
    critical incident you may have during your practice and record a video at least 3-4
    minutes answering the following questions.

    • Why was this incident significant to you?


    • What happened directly before the event?
    • What happened directly after the event?
    • How did you react at the time of the event?
    • What is your interpretation of this event?
    • What underlying assumptions about your teaching does this critical incident
    raise for you?
    • Now that you have reflected on this critical incident, would you react any
    differently if it happened again? Why or why not?

    Step 5: Diario de Campo Format and evidende from practice task 3

    2
    Fill in 1 -“Diario de Campo” Annex 4 with the required information about an English
    Class and add upload them to the link Google drive you got in task2. This form is in
    the file where you can find the activity guide. Name the form like this: FORMATO
    DIARIO DE CAMPO No.1_YOUR NAME. (In capital letters).

    Note: all the forms must be filled in English if you submit the field notes or
    working plan in Spanish you are not going to get the corresponding points and
    you will have to fill in the forms again, if you do so your points are going to be
    reduced by the tutor, the same situation if you submit the forms late.

    Step 6: Second ESAPEC

    You must attend to one mandatory meeting whose scheduled will be announced in
    the course news forum and via internal- email. During this encounter you must
    develop the activity proposed by the tutor.

    STEP 7: Practice forms

    1. For this task, you have to deliver the second attendance form “Single form – F-
    7-6-12 -FORMATO DE ASISTENCIA AL LUGAR DE PRÁCTICA NO.2” Annex 2 for
    at least 25 hours out of the 64 hours that you have to certificate. The hours must be
    certified by your school teacher and tutor of the course. You must fill in the form
    completely including the dates, hours, and activities.

    Consider the following to fill in the Second attendance form:

    -The dates must have the day, month, and year.


    -The activities must be clear, but brief.
    - The name and signature must be clear and placed in the right spot, and the
    signature must be handwritten.

    The activities to be included in the first attendance form are the following:
    Person in charge of
    Activities No. certificating these hours
    Hours
    Materials Designed 5 hours The teacher from the
    In situ practice 20 hours institution

    3
    ESAPEC attendance 2 Hours
    Total of hours in the second
    attendance form 27 hours

    The 2 hours for attendance to ESAPEC meeting will be signed by the UNAD
    tutor in a different form (F-7-6-12)

    2. Be sure to fill in the evaluation of the practice place “EVALUACIÓN DEL


    ESCENARIO DE PRACTICA PEDAGÓGICA”, this form is going to be sent by the
    course director and posted in the news forum of the course, you need to fill in the
    form and take a screenshot as evidence of the development of the form.

    Name the form like this: EVALUACIÓN DEL ESCENARIO DE PRÁCTICA


    PEDAGÓGICA_YOUR NAME. (In capital letters)

    3. Make sure the teacher from the institution you are assigned develops the
    evaluation of the practice “EVALUACIÓN DE PRACTICA PEDAGÓGICA”, this form
    is going to be sent by the course tutor to the teacher at the practice place. The
    teacher from the institution must fill in the form as required, and you need to ask for
    a copy or screenshot of that evaluation.

    Name the form like this: EVALUACIÓN DE PRÁCTICA PEDAGÓGICA_YOUR


    NAME. (In capital letters)

    4. In your official folder, you are going to create a subfolder called “PHASE 3”,
    where you are going to include the following documents:

    a. Second field note (diario de campo #2)


    b. Second attendance form. (Formato de asistencia al lugar de práctica #2= 25
    hours) (WORD), handwritten signature, and scanned.
    c. Practice place evaluation (Evaluación del escenario de práctica pedagógica) PDF
    d. Practice evaluation (Evaluación de práctica pedagógica) PDF

    Note: all the forms must be filled in English, if you submit the field notes or
    attendance form in Spanish you are not going to get the corresponding
    points and you will have to fill in the forms again, if you do so, your points
    are going to be reduced by the tutor, same situation if you submit the forms
    late.

    4
    You are going to upload in a PDF evidence of the classes and activities applied at the
    institution assigned, Photos, and screenshots in PDF. Forms with the links to the
    online classes or sessions done in PDF.

    Make sure your folder meets the following organization:

    For the development of the practical component consider that:


    In the Initial Information Environment, you must:

    In the Initial Information Environment, you must: observe the course presentation,
    check the course agenda, and the date of the synchronous meetings via web
    conferences, and attention through the TEAMS group.

    In the Learning Environment, you must: have access to the course syllabus,
    download the guide, and check the links of the documents you must consider for
    the development of the activity.

    In the Evaluation Environment, you must: Submit the final document, which meets
    the requirements of the guide.
    In the Learning Environment, you must:

    Evidences of individual work:

    5
    The individual evidence to be submitted is:

    - Cover Page.
    - Microteaching-recording link.
    - 2 Observation worksheet from your mate and the one you did.
    - 1 Diario de campo format you must upload it in the onedrive file that the tutor
    sent in task 2.
    - Critical incident - video
    - Screenshots of your evidence of attendance to ESAPEC.

    Evidences of collaborative work:


    No collaborative evidence is required in this activity.

    2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences

    For Individual evidence, consider the following:

    Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets all
    the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.

    The forms and the documents must be submitted according to the requirements.

    Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
    with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
    Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
    comply with APA style.
    In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
    You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found on the virtual
    campus.

    Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
    among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
    work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
    another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
    includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
    paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
    research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
    de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

    6
    The academic penalties students will face are:
    a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
    score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
    b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
    will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

    3. Evaluation Rubric Template

    Activity type: Individual


    Activity number: 2
    Evaluation moment: Intermediate
    The highest score possible is 140 points
    Criteria Performance levels
    First evaluation High level: The student takes part in the forum actively and
    criterion: on time posting the answers to the questions, the video-
    recording link, the partner’s name you will observe.
    If your work is at this level, you can get between 17 points
    and 20 points

    The student takes Average level: The student takes part in the forum late or 3
    part in the forum days before the deadline, posting some of the individual
    actively. contributions: the answers to the questions, the video-
    recording link, the partner’s name you will observe.
    If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points
    and 16 points

    This criterion Low level: The student takes part in the forum 1 day before
    represents 20 the deadline or did not take part in the forum.
    points of the total
    of 140 points of If your work is at this level, you can get between 0 points
    the activity. and 8 points
    Second evaluation High level: The student applies a checklist to one partner’s
    criterion: video recording offering constructive feedback to peers
    generating self-awareness about the impact of one’s teaching
    practice in order to affect change.

    7
    The student applies If your work is at level, you can get between 27 points
    the Peer- and 30 points
    observation
    checklist. Average level: The student applies a checklist to one
    partner’s video recording, however, he/she did not give
    constructive feedback to peers.

    If your work is at this level, you can get between 9 points


    and 26 points

    Low level: The student did not apply a checklist to one


    This criterion partner’s video recording.
    represents 30 .
    points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
    of 140 points of points and 8 points
    the activity.
    Third evaluation High level: The student identifies a critical incident in an
    criterion: educational context serving to trigger insights about some
    aspect of teaching and learning, applying the required 3 steps

    If your work is at this level, you can get between 27 points


    The student and 30 points
    identifies a critical
    incident in an Average level: The student identifies a critical incident in an
    educational context, following some of the required steps.Some
    educational context.
    of the ideas are adequately focused and organized

    If your work is at this level, you can get between 6 points


    and 26 points

    Low level: The student identifies a critical incident in an


    This criterion educational context,but it did not apply the steps.
    represents 30
    points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
    of 140 points of points and 5 points.
    the activity.
    Fourth evaluation
    High level: The student attends the first ESAPEC encounter
    criterion:
    taking an critical stance about the topics.

    8
    If your work is at this level, you can get between 17 points
    The student and 20 points
    participates in the
    first ESAPEC Average level: the student does not participate in the first
    meeting. ESAPEC of the course, but submits the extra task asked by the
    tutor.
    If your work is at this level, you can get between 7 points
    and 16 points

    This criterion Low level: the student does not participate in the first ESAPEC
    represents 20 or does the extra task..
    points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
    of 140 points of points and 6 points
    the activity.
    Fifth evaluation High level: The student submits the second practice
    criterion: attendance form including the 25 hours required as shown in
    the guide. The diario de campo and the evidences demostrate
    .The student the performance in the practice.They are in PDF document.
    submits the second
    practice attendance If your work is at this level, you can get between 35 points
    form, the diario de and 40 points
    campo #2 with the
    corresponding Average level: the student submits the second practice
    evidence of the attendance form but it does not include the 20 – 25 hours
    practice required as shown in the guide. The evidence from the practice
    development is not in PDF document or was uploaded out of date phase 2.

    If your work is at this level, you can get between 7 points


    and 34 points

    This criterion Low level: the student does not submit the second practice
    represents 40 attendance form or it does not include the corresponding
    points of the total signatures.There is no evidence from the practice.
    of 140 points of
    the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 0 points
    and 6 points

    You might also like