Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 2 - Phase 3 - Language and Teachers Skills
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 2 - Phase 3 - Language and Teachers Skills
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 2 - Phase 3 - Language and Teachers Skills
Examine the development of receptive and productive skills in the teaching of English
as a foreign language by creating and implementing material to foster such skills.
Theoretical Part:
Step 2. Choose 1 receptive skill and 1 productive skill and create 1 worksheet or
didactic material for each skill where you put into practice the guidelines and factors
given in the VOI “Designing English language materials”. in order to get some
feedback from your tutor and groupmates, share your material in the forum
specifying:
• what the population and needs of students are (the population form your
practice place)
• The topic or topics your material intends to cover
• The language skill it intends to foster
1
Step 3. Based on the readings The skills needed in a digital age and Exploring
teacher competence in language teaching , create an infographic describing the
profile of an English teacher in the XXI century; it must include the competences and
the main characteristics an English teacher must have in his pedagogical exercise.
Step 4. Implement the material you created in phase 3 in the educational institution
you are in, upload the material in the material evidence folder and document the
implementation in the photo evidence folder.
Step 5. Individually upload the following documents into your e-portfolio Phase 3,
bearing in mind the hourly distribution for this phase:
2
Forms folder
Include the following documents in PDF and named as indicated.
1 diario de campo
1 formato de asistencia that includes:
8 hours (Participant Observation Practice)
2 hours (Material Development)
Upload the following document to this folder, all the document must be in PDF format:
Forms Diario de Campo form:
Please identify your file as follows: Diario de Campo_Your Full Name_ID Number. Upload a PDF
file.
Example:
Diario de Campo__Maria Martinez Pérez_123456789.PDF
Upload the following document to this folder, all the document must be in PDF format:
Formato de Asistencia al Lugar de Practica:
Please identify your file as follows:
Formato de Asistencia al Lugar de Practica_Your Full Name_ID Number. Upload a PDF file.
Example:
Formato de Asistencia al Lugar de Practica __Maria Martinez Pérez_123456789.PDF
Photo Upload the following document to this folder, all the document must be in PDF format:
Photo Evidence: Please identify your file as follows: Photo Evidence _Your Full Name_ID
Evidence Number. Upload a PDF file.
Example:
Photo Evidence__Maria Martinez Pérez_123456789.PDF
3
Material design evidence folder
Upload to your folder all the material you have designed for the school. This material
must be designed by the student, and it is totally forbidden to download and use
information from other authors.
Material Upload the following document to this folder, all the document must be in PDF format:
Material Evidence:
The previous information must be in the e-portfolio and be delivered before the
deadline. The forms that you upload must be filled and you cannot change the size,
color, or any other characteristic that the original document has.
In the Evaluation Environment, you must: upload the collaborative work in the link:
Unit 2 - Phase 3 - Language and teachers’ Skills - Rubric and Activity Submission
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)
5
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.
The student If your work is at this level, you can get between 17 points
describes receptive and 20 points
and productive skills
and their teaching Average level: The student partially describes receptive and
methods productive skills and their teaching methods.
This criterion If your work is at this level, you can get between 12 points
represents 20 and 16 points
points of the total
of 120 points of Low level: The student does not describe receptive and
the activity. productive skills and their teaching methods.
6
of 120 points of Low level: The student does not design meaningful material
the activity. for their pedagogical practice
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 11 points
Third evaluation High level: The student accurately creates an infographic that
criterion: details thoroughly the competences of an English teacher in the
new digital era.
The infographic If your work is at this level, you can get between 17 points
describes in a and 20 points
detailed way the
skills and Average level: The student creates a somewhat accurate
competences of an infographic that details some of the competences of an English
English teacher in teacher in the new digital era.
the digital era.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 12 points
This criterion and 16 points
represents 20
points of the total Low level: The student does not create an infographic that
of 120 points of details thoroughly the competences of an English teacher in the
the activity. new digital era.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 11 points
Fourth evaluation High level:
criterion: The student accurately completes and uploads all the requested
forms of the participant observation practice in the provided e-
The student portfolio and the student successfully organizes and names all
develops the the formats in the correct manner. There are no mistakes at all
participant in terms of content and form.
observation part of
this phase fulfilling If your work is at this level, you can get 60 points
the instructions
given. Average level: The student uploads all the formats for phase
3 and names and organizes them in a correct manner but the
This criterion
content is somehow weak, as it does not state a critical and well-
represents 60
informed practice process based on the theory.
points of the total
of 120 points of
the activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point
and 59 points
7
Low level: The student does not complete nor uploads all the
requested forms of the participant observation practice as
requested or the e-portfolio is incomplete and the forms are not
correctly named or the folder is empty