Jelp03!03!02 Foyet Patricia m00356

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POLICY | 03(03) DECEMBER 2023
Published by The Grassroots Institute, in partnership with Yaroslav Mudriy National

Law University of Ukraine, and in collaboration with Northern Institute of Minority &
Environmental Law, University of Lapland. Website: https://grassrootsjournals.org/jelp
ISSN 2564-016X | December 2023 M – 00356 | Research Article | Open Access
HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED CONSERVATION:

THE INTEGRAL ROLE OF HUMAN RIGHTS
DIRECTOR IN THE CONSERVATION SECTOR
Metolo Foyet
Department of Geography, University of Florida,
Turlington Hall, 3141, 330 Newell Dr, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Email: [email protected] | ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8054-2281
Patricia Mupeta-Muyamwa
The Nature Conservancy, 4245 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 100, Arlington, VA 22203 USA.
Email: [email protected] | ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2099-8480
Received: 17 October 2023 | Accepted: 10 December 2023 | Published: 31 December 2023
ABSTRACT
Historically, many conservation organizations operated without a dedicated focus on
human rights, lacking a systematic approach to ensure compliance with global
human rights standards. This oversight led to practices that inadvertently
disregarded fundamental human rights principles. Recognizing the pivotal role of
communities and Indigenous rights in resource management, there has been a
paradigm shift. Conservation organizations now acknowledge the need for a Human
Rights Director, a role catalysing a community-centric approach and aligning
initiatives with human rights principles. While this shift is in its early stages, it
signifies a crucial step towards more responsible and sustainable conservation
practices. The Human Rights Director, often underestimated, plays a vital role in
navigating the delicate balance between biodiversity conservation and community
well-being. This paper explores the responsibilities, challenges, and impact of
individuals in this position, emphasizing their role as stewards of ethical practices
and advocates for social justice. Through a comprehensive review, case studies and
best practices, the paper sheds light on the intricate intersections of human rights and
conservation. It underscores the indispensable contributions of Human Rights
Directors and their teams to conscientious and sustainable conservation strategies.
The discussion contributes to the broader discourse on the synergies between human
rights advocacy and effective conservation, emphasizing the imperative for
organizations to prioritize the creation of a Human Rights unit. This unit can
empower teams to achieve socially responsible conservation outcomes, marking a
transformative journey towards ethical conservation practices.
Keywords: Human Rights Director; Conservation organizations; Indigenous rights;
Ethical practices
Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Dr. Kamrul Hossain | Deputy Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Evgeniya Kopitsa,
Prof. Dr. Ngozi Finette Unuigbe | Executive Editor: Dr. Hasrat Arjjumend
How to cite this paper: Metolo Foyet and Patricia Mupeta-Muyamwa, ‗Human
Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of Human Rights Director in the
Conservation Sector‘ (2023) 03 (03) Journal of Environmental Law & Policy 23-86,
<https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp030302>
Copyright © 2023 by author(s). This work is licensed under the Creative Commons
Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
ISSN 2564-016X | Journal of Environmental Law & Policy | 03 (03) (December 2023): 02
Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

Human Rights Director in the Conservation Sector
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background and Context of Human Rights in Conservation

The intersection of human rights and conservation is a complex and
multifaceted issue that involves the balance between preserving the natural
environment and respecting the rights and livelihoods of local communities
and Indigenous Peoples.1 This topic emerged as a response to the potential
conflicts that arise when conservation efforts disregard or infringe upon the
rights of the people who inhabit and depend on the areas being conserved.2
The concept of human rights in the context of conservation refers to the
recognition and protection of the rights of individuals and communities in
relation to natural resources and environmental conservation efforts. It
highlights the interconnectedness between environmental well-being
(stewardship) and the well-being of human beings, acknowledging that the
conservation of nature should not come at the expense of human rights and
social justice. The background and context of human rights in conservation
are rooted in several key factors as elaborated in table 1.
Table 1: Key factors shaping the background and context of human rights in
conservation
Indigenous Many conservation areas, particularly in biodiverse
Peoples and Local regions, are home to Indigenous peoples and local
Communities communities who have lived in harmony with their
environments for generations, and have traditional
knowledge and practices that contribute to
sustainable resource management. These
communities often have deep cultural, spiritual, and
economic connections to the land and its resources.
Ignoring their rights and traditional knowledge and
establishing protected areas without consulting or
involving these groups can lead to displacement,
loss of livelihoods and access to resources, and
cultural disruption. Human rights in conservation
recognize the importance of respecting and
safeguarding these communities' rights to land,
resources, and cultural heritage.
1
Colchester, M., “Conservation policy and Indigenous peoples” (2004) 7 (3) Environmental
Science & Policy 145-153. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.02.004>.
2
Adams, W., & Hutton, J., “People, parks and poverty: political ecology and biodiversity
conservation” (2007) 5 (2) Conservation and Society 147-183. Retrieved from
<https://journals.lww.com/coas/Fulltext/2007/05020/People,_Parks_and_Poverty__Political_Ecol
ogy_and.1.aspx>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
24
Metolo Foyet and Patricia Mupeta-Muyamwa

Traditional Indigenous peoples and local communities possess

Knowledge valuable traditional knowledge about their
ecosystems, which has often been refined over
generations. This knowledge can contribute
significantly to effective conservation strategies.
Failing to recognize and incorporate this knowledge
can hinder conservation efforts and perpetuate a
lack of respect for human rights.
Displacement and In the name of protecting wildlife and ecosystems,
Land Rights conservation initiatives have sometimes led to the
displacement and forced eviction of local
communities from their ancestral lands, disrupting
their way of life and undermining their rights. This
has raised ethical and legal concerns regarding the
violation of people's rights to housing, livelihoods,
and cultural heritage. Recognizing and protecting
land tenure and property rights is crucial to ensuring
that conservation efforts respect human rights.
Access to Many communities depend on natural resources for
Resources and their livelihoods, such as hunting, fishing, and
Livelihoods agriculture. Conservation efforts that restrict or ban
these activities without providing alternative
sustainable livelihood options can lead to poverty
and social unrest. Human rights in conservation
emphasize equitable access to natural resources and
benefits derived from conservation efforts. This
includes ensuring that marginalized and vulnerable
groups have a say in decision-making processes and
receive fair compensation for any limitations placed
on their resource use.
Environmental Conservation can lead to conflicts between various
Justice stakeholders, including governments, conservation
organizations, local communities, and businesses.
Addressing these conflicts requires a rights-based
approach that considers the needs and perspectives
of all parties involved. Environmental conservation
efforts can disproportionately impact marginalized
and disadvantaged communities, leading to
environmental injustices. Human rights principles
seek to address these disparities and ensure that
conservation actions do not perpetuate or exacerbate
social inequalities.
Human Rights The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of
Frameworks, Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and other
International international agreements recognize the rights of
Agreements and Indigenous peoples and local communities in
25

Declarations relation to natural resources and conservation.

These international agreements provide a
foundation for understanding the importance of
respecting human rights in conservation efforts; and
act as frameworks that emphasize principles such as
non-discrimination, participation, and the right to
an adequate standard of living. Many countries
have enacted laws and policies that recognize the
rights of Indigenous peoples and local communities,
as well as the importance of community-based
conservation initiatives. These legal frameworks
provide a basis for integrating human rights
principles into conservation practices.
Free, Prior, and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and
Informed other international human rights instruments
Consent (FPIC) emphasize the importance of obtaining free, prior,
and informed consent (FPIC) from affected
communities before implementing conservation
projects on their lands. FPIC is a principle
recognized in international law that emphasizes the
importance of involving Indigenous peoples and
local communities in decision-making processes that
affect their lands, resources, and rights. Obtaining
genuine consent ensures that conservation
initiatives are aligned with the wishes and needs of
the affected communities.
Conservation and The relationship between conservation and
Development development is complex, often involving trade-offs
Balancing Act between preserving ecosystems and promoting
economic growth. Human rights considerations aim
to strike a balance between conservation goals and
the rights of people, seeking sustainable solutions
that benefit both.
Sustainable The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals
Development emphasize the interconnectedness of social,
Goals (SDGs) economic, and environmental issues. Conservation
efforts that align with these goals consider both
ecological integrity and human well-being.
Collaborative A more holistic and rights-based approach to
Conservation conservation involves collaborating with local
communities and Indigenous peoples. This includes
engaging them in planning, management, and
decision-making processes to ensure that
conservation initiatives are sustainable, equitable,
and culturally sensitive.
26

It is globally acclaimed that successful and sustainable conservation

efforts require collaboration, inclusivity, and a respect for the rights and
well-being of all individuals and communities affected by conservation
initiatives.3, 4
In recent years, there has been a growing recognition within the
conservation community of the need to integrate human rights
considerations into conservation strategies.5 This includes acknowledging
and respecting the rights, needs, and perspectives of local communities and
Indigenous peoples. It's important to strike a balance between conservation
goals and the protection of human rights, while also seeking innovative
ways to achieve both simultaneously. The ethical considerations of
balancing rights, cultural sensitivity, and benefit distribution collectively
underscore the intricate decision-making processes that conservation
organizations must navigate to ensure a harmonious integration of human
rights within their initiatives.6, 7
1.2 Significance of the Role of Human Rights Director in Conservation

Organizations
The role of a Human Rights Director in conservation organizations
holds significant importance due to the intricate connections between
environmental conservation and human rights. This position is of
paramount importance, as it bridges the gap between conservation efforts
and the protection of human rights and focuses on ensuring that
conservation efforts are conducted in a manner that respects, protects, and
promotes the rights of individuals and communities, particularly those who
are directly impacted by conservation initiatives.8
The jurisdiction of the Human Rights Director spans across a global
context, as environmental conservation and human rights issues often
transcends national boundaries. In this role, the director works on a global
scale to address and mitigate the potential negative impacts of conservation
projects on local populations, ensuring that internationally recognized
human rights standards are upheld. Additionally, the Human Rights
Director may also collaborate with local, regional, and international
stakeholders to tailor approaches to specific country contexts. While the
overarching goal is to safeguard human rights globally within the realm of
3
Michael B. Mascia, J. Peter Brosius, Tracy A. Dobson, Bruce C. Forbes, Leah Horowitz, Margaret
A. McKean, & Nancy J. Turner, “Conservation and the social sciences” (2003) 17 (3)
Conservation Biology 649-650. <https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01738.x>
4
IUCN, “World Conservation Congress Resolutions”, (2020). Retrieved from
<https://www.iucn.org/congress/resolutions>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
5
UNESCO, “World Heritage and Sustainable Development: The Role of Local Communities” (2012).
Retrieved from <https://whc.unesco.org/en/events/907/>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
6
William M. Adams, Ros Aveling, Dan Brockington, Barney Dickson, Jo Elliott, Jon Hutton, Dilys
Roe, Bhaskar Vira, & William Wolmer, “Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of
poverty” (2004) 306 (5699) Science 1146-1149. <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097920>
7
Igoe, J., “Human rights, conservation, and the privatization of sovereignty in Africa–a discussion
of recent changes in Tanzania” (2007) 15 (276) Policy matters 532-34.
8
Büscher, B., Dressler, W., & Fletcher, R., “Environmental conservation in the neoliberal age”
(2014) University of Arizona Press.
27

conservation, the director may need to adapt strategies and interventions to

the unique social, cultural, and legal frameworks of different countries. This
adaptability is crucial for effectively navigating diverse landscapes and
fostering sustainable conservation practices that prioritize both
environmental integrity and human well-being. This role holds major
significance due to several reasons as depicted in figure 1.
Figure 1: Significance of the role of Human Rights Director in Conservation

organizations
•Conservation efforts that disregard

human rights can lead to violation of the • Human rights violations that conservation
rights of Indigenous peoples, local initiatives can inadvertently lead to
communities, and vulnerable groups. include marginalizaion, forced evictions,
Conservation organizations have a moral displacement of Indigenous communities,
obligation to protect the rights and well- or denial of access to natural resources.
being of people while pursuing •The HRD plays a crucial role in ensuring
environmental goals. that conservation efforts respect and
•The HRD ensures that the organization uphold the rights of local communities,
upholds ethical integrity and moral Indigenous peoples, and other
standards by integrating human rights stakeholders.
principles into its conservation strategies
and by preventing or rectifying any
human rights abuses that may arise from
conservation activities.
Balancing
Ethical and Moral Conservation and
Responsibility Human Rights
Part Figure 1a
•Conservation projects can sometimes •Successful conservation initiatives require

lead to conflicts between different the engagement and participation of local
stakeholders, such as communities, communities.
governments, and conservationists. •The HRD facilitates meaningful
•The HRD plays a mediating role in engagement and consultations during
resolving conflicts and finding mutually project planning and implementation,
beneficial solutions that safeguard both and obtains free, prior, and informed
environmental and human rights. He/she consent (FPIC) from these communities.
facilitates dialogue, negotiations, and This ensures that (a) conservation efforts
conflict resolution between the are carried out with the understanding
organization and affected parties. This and approval of those directly affected;
helps prevent tensions and build (b) Indigenous rights, perspectives, and
collaborative partnerships for effective traditional knowledge are respected.
conservation.
Community Engagement and

Conflict Resolution Consent
Part Figure 1b
28

•Human rights considerations add •Human rights laws and international

depth to decision-making processes. agreements often require that the rights
•The HRD provides valuable insights of Indigenous peoples and local
that help the organization make communities are respected in
informed choices that balance conservation projects. Many countries
conservation goals with the rights have laws that protect the rights of
and needs of communities. Indigenous peoples and local
communities.
•The HRD ensures that the organization
complies with these laws and
international agreements - such as
obtaining FPIC before implementing
projects on community lands - and other
legal obligations.
Informed Decision-
Legal Compliance
Making
Part Figure 1c
•Effective conservation requires building trust

•Conservation efforts often lead to and partnerships with local communities,
changes in resource access and land Indigenous groups, and other stakeholders.
use.
•The HRD fosters these relationships by
•The HRD ensures that benefits derived promoting transparency, inclusivity, and
from conservation activities are accountability. By championing human rights
distributed equitably among within the organization, he/she helps build
communities, helping to prevent trust between the organization he/she
further marginalization and social represents and communities. This trust is
injustices. crucial for maintaining long-term support for
conservation efforts and fostering
collaboration.
Equitable Benefit Building Trust and

Sharing Partnerships
•The HRD assesses potential social and •The HRD may engage in advocacy efforts
human rights impacts of conservation to raise awareness about the importance
projects before implementation. If of respecting and integrating human
adverse impacts are identified, the rights principles into conservation
director works to mitigate them and practices and policies, both within the
ensures that appropriate measures are organization and in broader conservation
taken to avoid harm. discourse. This can lead to broader
societal support for conservation
initiatives that respect and protect
human rights.
Impact Assessment Advocacy and

and Mitigation Awareness
Part Figure 1d
29

•Biodiversity and ecosystems are

interconnected with human well- •The HRD may engage in capacity-building
being. Considering human rights initiatives to empower local communities and
alongside environmental concerns Indigenous groups to actively participate in
promotes a holistic approach to conservation decision-making processes. This
conservation that addresses both empowers communities to assert their rights
ecological and social dimensions. and contribute to successful conservation
outcomes.
•Many communities rely on natural
resources for their livelihoods.
•The HRD ensures that conservation
efforts do not disrupt these livelihoods
but rather contribute to sustainable
development and well-being.
Safeguarding Capacity Building and

Livelihoods Empowerment
Part Figure 1e
•The HRD oversees the monitoring and •Integrating human rights into
evaluation of the social impacts of conservation strategies contributes to the
conservation projects on communities. sustainability of conservation efforts. By
This ensures that any negative effects are ensuring that communities benefit from
identified and addressed promptly. conservation initiatives, the HRD helps
create a positive cycle where local
support for conservation grows over time.
Monitoring and Sustainable

Evaluation Conservation
Part Figure 1f
In essence, the role of a Human Rights Director in conservation

organizations is crucial for fostering ethical, inclusive, and sustainable
conservation practices that prioritize the well-being and rights of all
stakeholders involved. It is also a crucial role for ensuring that
environmental conservation efforts are carried out in a manner that
respects, honours, upholds, and promotes the rights, dignity, and well-
being of all individuals and communities involved. This holistic approach
contributes to more effective conservation outcomes.
1.3 Purpose and Objectives of the Paper

This paper provides both an in-depth examination and a
comprehensive exploration of existing knowledge, research, and theoretical
frameworks relevant to the intersection of human rights and conservation.
It can equally substantiate as a literature review. The paper aims to enhance
30

understanding in the subject matter, enabling professionals to effectively

catalyze positive change at the juncture of human rights and conservation.
Beyond expanding knowledge and broadening awareness of relevant
practices, the purpose is to strengthen the role of a professional, specifically
the human rights director within conservation organizations. This not only
seeks to empower individuals in this position, but also endeavours to equip
them with innovative approaches at the nexus of human rights and
conservation.
Gaining a deep Equipping Developing

understanding of stakeholders with expertise in the
the current state of the necessary subject matter,
human rights issues information to allowing
within the context make informed stakeholders to
of conservation. decisions and communicate
recommendations effectively with
Informed Decision-Making
Understanding the Landscape
Building Expertise
This will enable
stakeholders to for integrating collaborators,
identify gaps, human rights address concerns,
challenges, and considerations and contribute
opportunities. into conservation meaningfully to
policies, programs, discussions related
and initiatives. to human rights
and conservation.
Figure 1: Purpose and objectives of Human Rights in Conservation studies
Different objectives of the paper can be illustrated as under:

1. To identify relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks related
to human rights and conservation. This could include
understanding concepts like the right to a healthy environment,
Indigenous rights, and the impacts of conservation activities on
local communities.
2. To examine case studies from various regions and contexts that
highlight successful or problematic examples of integrating
human rights considerations into conservation efforts. Learn
from these cases to inform your approach.
3. To explore the legal and policy frameworks at the national and
international levels that relate to human rights and
conservation. Understand how these frameworks can guide
human rights in conservation work and what gaps might exist.
4. To identify some stakeholders involved in conservation
initiatives, including local communities, Indigenous peoples,
NGOs, governments, and more. Understand their perspectives,
concerns, and expectations regarding human rights and
conservation.
31

5. To synthesize best practices for promoting human rights while

pursuing conservation goals. This could involve strategies for
community engagement, informed consent, benefit-sharing, and
conflict resolution.
6. To address ethical considerations and dilemmas that may arise
when balancing conservation objectives with human rights
concerns. Develop strategies to navigate these challenges while
upholding both ethical principles.
7. To identify opportunities for collaboration between
conservation organizations, human rights advocates, and other
relevant stakeholders. Collaboration can lead to more effective
and holistic approaches.
8. To inform strategy development: use the insights gained from
the literature review to shape your strategy as a Human Rights
Director in Conservation. Develop a roadmap for integrating
human rights principles into conservation programs and
initiatives.
2. METHODOLOGY
This paper is the synthesis of a pre-consultancy conducted for a key

organisation in the conservation industry. It encapsulates the preliminary
investigative stage that preceded the formal research and development of
the consultancy. It integrates insights gained during the pre-consultancy
phase with the findings from the cases to create a comprehensive
understanding of the role of Human Rights Director. The process that led to
the decision to explore the role of Human Rights Director in conservation
organizations included:
 Needs assessment: interactions with conservationists, community
leaders, and organizational leaders allowed the authors to identify
the specific challenges or gaps in conservation practices that led to
the recognition of the need for a Human Rights Director.
 Stakeholder consultation: informal consultations with relevant
stakeholders in the field in Southern Africa allowed the authors to
gather insights into the perceived intersections between
conservation and human rights. This included internal discussions
within conservation organizations in Namibia and South Africa,
discussions with community representatives in Sub-Saharan
Africa, and expert opinions.
 Document analysis was conducted to understand the experiences
and practices of organizations in integrating human rights
considerations.
 Comparative analysis was conducted of the data collected from
cases to compare the practices of organizations with and without
dedicated Human Rights Directors.
32

 Finally, actionable recommendations were discussed based on the

integrated findings to guide conservation organizations in their
approach to incorporating human rights principles.
3. HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONSERVATION: THE INTERSECTION
3.1 Overview of Human Rights Principles and Frameworks

Human rights are fundamental rights and freedoms that every person
is entitled to, regardless of race, nationality, sex, gender, religion, or other
characteristics. These rights are enshrined in various international treaties
and declarations, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR)9 and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(ICCPR)10. Some key human rights principles include the right to life,
liberty, security, freedom from discrimination, torture, and slavery, the
right to participate in cultural, social, and political life and the right to a
healthy environment. These principles serve as the foundation for
understanding the intersection of human rights and conservation.
The Human Rights Director plays a critical role in translating these
principles into action within the conservation sector, ensuring that
environmental initiatives are not only ecologically sound but also ethically
and socially responsible. By upholding these universal human rights
standards, the director contributes to the development of conservation
practices that not only preserve the planet's biodiversity but also respect the
dignity and well-being of all individuals, irrespective of their geographical
location or socio-cultural context.
3.2 Application of Human Rights to Conservation Contexts

Applying human rights to conservation contexts involves ensuring
that conservation initiatives respect and protect the rights of all affected
parties (mainly local communities and Indigenous peoples). This may
include conducting thorough impact assessments to identify potential
human rights violations, seeking the free, prior, and informed consent of
Indigenous and local communities, and providing mechanisms for redress
when rights are violated (e.g., providing fair compensation or alternative
livelihood options). It also involves recognizing and respecting the cultural
and spiritual ties that communities have to their lands and resources.
The Human Rights Director takes on the responsibility of
implementing these practices globally, working collaboratively with
conservation teams and local stakeholders to integrate human rights
considerations into the fabric of conservation projects. By fostering
partnerships built on mutual respect and understanding, the director
ensures that conservation efforts not only safeguard ecosystems but also
9
<https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights>.
10
<https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-
covenant-civil-and-political-rights>
33

contribute to the empowerment and well-being of communities, fostering a

sustainable and inclusive approach to environmental conservation.
3.3 Integration of Human Rights Considerations into Conservation

Policies and Practices
In the evolving landscape of environmental conservation, the
recognition of the interconnectedness between human rights and
conservation has become increasingly crucial. The intricate dance between
preserving our planet's biodiversity and respecting the fundamental rights of
individuals and communities has given rise to a paradigm shift in
conservation strategies. Acknowledging that conservation initiatives have
profound implications for local populations, particularly Indigenous
communities, has prompted a re-evaluation of the ethical dimensions
inherent in these efforts. Before delving into the specifics of how human
rights intersect with conservation policies and practices, it is imperative to
understand the broader context in which these considerations unfold. The
delicate balance between environmental sustainability and the well-being of
communities requires a nuanced approach that respects the dignity,
autonomy, and cultural integrity of those directly impacted by conservation
initiatives. This recognition lays the groundwork for a holistic understanding
of the integration of human rights into conservation policies, emphasizing
the imperative to navigate the complexities of ecological preservation with a
commitment to social justice and human dignity.
The integration of human rights into conservation policies and
practices involves five steps:
1. Assessment: Identifying potential human rights impacts of
conservation activities through assessments and consultations
with affected communities.
2. Mitigation: Developing strategies to mitigate and minimize
negative human rights impacts while maximizing positive
contributions.
3. Inclusion: Ensuring the meaningful participation of local
communities and Indigenous peoples in conservation decision-
making processes.
4. Adaptation: Adapting conservation plans and activities based
on feedback and changing human rights circumstances.
5. Accountability: Establishing mechanisms for accountability and
redress when human rights violations occur.
3.4 Conceptual Framework for Integrating Human Rights into

Conservation
Integrating human rights into conservation requires a conceptual
framework that involves recognizing the interdependence of environmental
protection and human rights and considers the aspects highlighted in figure 3.
34

Figure 3: Framework for integrating Human Rights into Conservation
The sequence of boxes in figure 3 reflects a logical flow of

considerations in a process that involves the interaction between a
community or group of people and external entities, such as governments,
organizations, or other stakeholders.
Starting with the principle of non-discrimination emphasizes the
importance of treating all individuals or groups fairly and without bias. This
sets a foundational ethical standard for the entire process. Following non-
discrimination, obtaining prior informed consent is crucial. This stage
35

involves ensuring that affected individuals or communities are fully

informed about any proposed actions or changes and can provide their
consent before these actions occur. This respects the autonomy and rights of
the affected parties. Recognizing customary rights comes next, as it
acknowledges and respects the traditional practices, land use, and cultural
rights of the affected community. This recognition is fundamental for
fostering a relationship built on mutual respect and understanding.
Establishing legal protections comes after recognizing customary rights. This
stage involves formalizing and codifying the rights of the community
through legal mechanisms. Legal protections provide a framework for
enforcing and safeguarding the recognized rights. Fostering participation
follows legal protections, emphasizing the importance of involving the
affected community in decision-making processes. This stage ensures that the
community has a voice in how policies are implemented and how resources
are managed, contributing to a more inclusive and effective governance
structure. Ensuring equity and justice is a critical stage that runs parallel to
other stages. It involves addressing historical injustices, promoting fairness,
and creating conditions where all individuals or groups have equal
opportunities and access to resources. Addressing benefit sharing comes last,
as it builds on the principles of non-discrimination, consent, recognition of
customary rights, legal protections, participation, and equity. This stage
involves ensuring that the benefits derived from any activities or
developments are distributed fairly among the affected community, aligning
with principles of justice and sustainability.
It's important to note that the optimal order of these stages11 can vary
based on the specific context, cultural considerations, and the nature of the
relationship between the involved parties. In some cases, certain stages may
need to be revisited or adjusted based on ongoing feedback and evolving
circumstances. The goal is to establish a comprehensive and respectful
process that promotes the well-being of the affected community while
achieving broader societal objectives.
3.5 Key Human Rights Issues in Conservation

The conservation of natural resources and ecosystems often intersects
with various human rights issues.
1. Land and Resource Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities

(IPLCs): Many conservation efforts take place in areas inhabited by
Indigenous Peoples and local communities. These groups often have
deep-rooted, traditional land and resource rights that form the
foundation of their cultural identity and sustainable livelihoods.
However, these rights are frequently susceptible to infringement by
conservation initiatives that are not people centred. Recognizing the
significance of safeguarding the land tenure rights and unfettered
11
The sequence follows a logical progression, beginning with the principle of non-discrimination, moving on to
informed consent, recognizing customary rights, establishing legal protections, fostering participation, ensuring
equity and justice, and finally, addressing benefit sharing.
36

access to natural resources for IPLCs becomes pivotal in addressing

the intersection of conservation and human rights. The Human
Rights Director plays a central role in advocating for and
implementing measures that respect these rights. This involves
conducting comprehensive impact assessments to understand the
potential consequences of conservation activities on local
populations, engaging in meaningful consultations to obtain free,
prior, and informed consent, engaging in collaborative decision-
making processes, incorporating traditional ecological knowledge
into conservation strategies, implementing measures that prevent
the displacement or marginalization of these communities, and
developing strategies to mitigate any adverse effects on IPLCs, such
as ensuring fair compensation or providing alternative livelihood
options. By prioritizing the protection of land and resource rights,
conservation initiatives not only become ethically grounded but also
gain the essential support and collaboration of the very
communities they aim to benefit. This holistic approach ensures that
the pursuit of environmental conservation aligns seamlessly with
the principles of social justice and human rights.
Figure 4: Key Human Rights issues in Conservation
2. Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) in Conservation Projects: FPIC

serves as a cornerstone principle in the ethical execution of
conservation projects, particularly in areas inhabited by Indigenous
Peoples. This fundamental phase requires obtaining the consent of
affected communities before initiating conservation projects on their
lands. Ensuring that they are fully informed and have the autonomy
and right to make decisions about activities on their lands is
essential for respecting their rights. The Human Rights Director is
tasked with ensuring that FPIC is not merely a procedural formality
but a substantive process that involves comprehensive information
37

sharing, transparent dialogue, and genuine partnership. By

upholding FPIC, conservation projects can be developed and
implemented in a manner that respects the sovereignty, freedom,
and cultural integrity of communities, fostering a collaborative and
mutually beneficial relationship between conservationists and local
populations.
3. Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Environmental Activists: The
advocacy for environmental protection and human rights in
conservation often involves individuals and groups who put
themselves at risk by challenging unsustainable practices. They can
face threats, harassment, and violence. Ensuring the safety and
protection of human rights defenders and environmental activists is
essential to maintain the integrity of conservation efforts. The
Human Rights Director plays a crucial role in creating an
environment where human rights defenders and environmental
activists can operate without fear of reprisal. This involves
monitoring and responding to threats, ensuring legal protections,
and collaborating with relevant authorities to address any incidents
of harassment or violence. Protecting these defenders is not only a
human rights imperative but also vital for maintaining the diversity
of voices and perspectives necessary for effective conservation
decision-making.
4. Gender Equality and Empowerment in Conservation Efforts: Recognizing
the pivotal role that women play in resource management and
conservation is essential for the success and sustainability of
conservation initiatives. It is important to address gender
inequalities, empower women, and ensure their full participation in
decision-making processes related to conservation. The Human
Rights Director advocates for gender equality by actively promoting
the inclusion of women in decision-making processes, ensuring
equal access to resources and opportunities, and addressing
systemic gender disparities. Empowering women in conservation
not only enhances the overall effectiveness of projects but also
contributes to the broader goal of achieving social equity and justice.
These issues highlight the complex interplay between conservation
efforts and human rights, emphasizing the importance of a rights-based
approach to conservation that considers the needs, interests, and rights of
local communities and marginalized groups. Balancing conservation goals
with human rights protections is a critical challenge for sustainable and
ethical conservation practices.
3.6 Addressing Social Conflicts and Displacement Associated with

Conservation Initiatives
Conservation initiatives, while aiming for ecological preservation, can
inadvertently lead to social conflicts and displacement. Conservation-led
displacement and eviction emerge as significant challenges within the
national parks of developing countries. While the overarching goal of these
38

parks is often the preservation of biodiversity and the protection of fragile

ecosystems, the methods employed may, at times, obscure ulterior motives
aligned with private extractive industries collaborating with the
government. This can result in the compelled relocation of indigenous
communities or local populations, revealing a hidden agenda that
contradicts the purported conservation goals, and creating a complex
dynamic where conservation efforts, while crucial for environmental
sustainability, intersect with the fundamental rights and livelihoods of
those residing in or dependent on these regions. In some cases, the
implementation of conservation policies may lack sufficient consideration
for the social and economic impacts on these communities, leading to a
poignant ethical dilemma at the crossroads of environmental preservation
and human rights.
Conservation-led displacement and eviction are pressing issues across
various regions, exemplifying the complex intersection between conservation
efforts and the well-being of local communities. In Africa, the Baka people in
the south-eastern rainforests in Cameroon, northern Republic of the Congo,
northern Gabon, and south-western Central African Republic were expelled
from their ancestral lands in the 1960s. They faced forced eviction and
displacement not only at the hands of the departing French colonial
administration but also from the emerging independent government.
Subsequently, pressures exerted by the World Bank compelled their
relocation to facilitate logging concessions and the establishment of national
parks. This forced migration subjected the Baka to persistent violence,
including instances of forced labour imposed by their newly settled
neighbours (IWGIA, 2020).12 Preserving a hunter-gatherer lifestyle, this
displacement disrupted their traditional ways of life, posed threats to their
cultural heritage, and continued to raise questions about the equity and
ethics of conservation strategies in the region (Kweli, 2021)13.
In Latin America, the indigenous communities of the Gran Chaco
region, spanning Argentina, Bolivia, and Paraguay, have experienced
displacement due to the expansion of conservation areas. The creation of
national parks and reserves has resulted in the loss of land essential for
their sustenance, impacting their livelihoods and traditional practices
(Chisleanschi, 2019)14. The conflict between conservation goals and the
12
IWGIA, “Indigenous peoples in Cameroon”, (2020, June 26). Retrieved from The International
Work Group for Indigenous Affairs <https://www.iwgia.org/en/cameroon/3791-violence,-
corruption,-and-false-promises-conservation-and-the-baka-in-
cameroon.html#:~:text=Forced%20from%20their%20forests%20by,labour%20by%20new%20se
dentary%20neighbours.>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
13
Kweli, N., “Denial of Legal Recognition for Baka in Cameroon”, (2021, November 18). Retrieved
from StoryMaps: <https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/e318bb915b404aa38a651d22ed990ab7>,
accessed on 23 November 2023.
14
Chisleanschi, R., “Gran Chaco: South America’s second-largest forest at risk of collapsing”,
(2019, September 17). Retrieved from Mongabay: <https://news.mongabay.com/2019/09/gran-
chaco-south-americas-second-largest-forest-at-risk-of-collapsing/>, accessed on 23 November
2023.
39

rights of these communities underscores the need for nuanced approaches

that consider both ecological preservation and human well-being.
In Asia, the establishment of protected areas in the name of
conservation has led to the displacement of Indigenous communities in
India. For instance, the Dongria Kondh people in the Niyamgiri Hills have
faced eviction due to mining and conservation activities (Survival
International, 2017).15 These displacements disrupted social structures and
has resulted in the loss of traditional knowledge linked to sustainable
resource management.
The issue is exacerbated by factors such as insufficient stakeholder
engagement, inadequate compensation mechanisms, and a lack of
alternative livelihood opportunities for those displaced. As national parks
become battlegrounds for the preservation of biodiversity and the
protection of cultural heritage versus the rights and well-being of local
communities, finding a balance that ensures both ecological sustainability
and social justice becomes imperative. Addressing conservation-led
displacement necessitates a comprehensive and inclusive approach,
involving collaborative efforts between conservation authorities,
governmental bodies, non-governmental organizations, and affected
communities to develop strategies that reconcile the dual objectives of
conservation and the protection of human rights.
Highlighting conservation-led displacement and eviction as a flagship
issue is crucial for several reasons. First, it brings attention to the ethical
dimensions of conservation practices, emphasizing the potential violations of
human rights in the pursuit of environmental preservation. Second, it
underscores the need for inclusive and participatory approaches that prioritize
the voices and well-being of affected communities. Third, by highlighting these
issues separately, it allows for a more nuanced examination of regional
variations and challenges, acknowledging the diversity of contexts across
Africa, Latin America, and Asia. Finally, addressing conservation-led
displacement as a distinct flagship issue fosters a more comprehensive
understanding of the complex interplay between environmental conservation,
human rights, and social justice, prompting a collective effort to develop
sustainable and equitable solutions on a global scale.
Respecting the rights of displaced individuals and communities16 is
essential and it is crucial to mitigate social conflicts and provide adequate
compensation and resettlement options for those affected by conservation
projects. The Human Rights Director takes a proactive stance in mitigating
these negative impacts by conducting thorough social impact assessments,
facilitating community engagement, and developing strategies to address
conflicts. Respecting the rights of displaced individuals and communities
involves providing fair compensation, offering alternative livelihood
15
Survival International, “Indian authorities harass tribal leaders”. (2017, May 10). Retrieved from
<https://www.survivalinternational.org/news/11682>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
16
Paige, W., Igoe, J., & Brockington, D., “Parks, and peoples: the social impact of protected areas”
(2006) 35, Annual Review of Anthropology 251-277.
<https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308>
40

options, and ensuring that resettlement processes are conducted in a

manner that upholds human dignity and minimizes adverse social
consequences. This holistic approach ensures that conservation efforts not
only protect the environment but also contribute positively to the well-
being of affected communities.
3.7 Importance of Integrating Human Rights Considerations into

Conservation Practices
The intersection of human rights and environmental conservation is a
critical area that requires attention and research. Incorporating human
rights considerations into conservation practices is crucial for reasons that
have been listed and discussed above. Conservation efforts often intersect
with the lives, livelihoods, and rights of local communities, and failing to
address these aspects can lead to negative social, economic, and
environmental outcomes.
Recognizing and upholding the rights of Indigenous Peoples - as
outlined in international agreements like the United Nations Declaration on
the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) - when designing and
executing conservation projects is essential.17 International human rights
frameworks, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, outline
the rights and freedoms that all individuals should enjoy.18 Many of these
rights have relevance in conservation contexts, including rights to land,
water, food, shelter, education, and a clean environment. Integrating the
considerations of national legal frameworks that protect the rights of
Indigenous and local communities, and international agreements that
emphasize the importance of respecting human rights in conservation is not
only ethically responsible but also legally mandated in many cases.19 The
importance of FPIC as a fundamental human rights principle in
conservation efforts must be emphasized, especially when projects impact
Indigenous territories or traditional lands (UNDRIP, Article 32). Also,
biodiversity conservation and the protection of cultural heritage, including
traditional knowledge and practices, are often intertwined with
conservation goals and local communities' way of life. Integrating human
rights considerations respects the cultural identity of communities and
helps preserve their traditions, languages, and practice contributing to the
overall well-being of communities.20
Conservation initiatives can impact local economies and livelihoods,
especially when communities rely on natural resources for their sustenance.
17
UN, “United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples” (2007). Retrieved from
United Nations: <https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-
content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf>
18
UN, “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (1948). Retrieved from
<https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
19
Campese, J., “Rights-based approaches: Exploring issues and opportunities for conservation”
(2009). Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR and IUCN.
20
ILO, “Convention No. 169 concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries”
(1989). Retrieved from International Labour Organization <https://tinyurl.com/4jp5hrjp>,
41

Integrating human rights ensures that people's economic well-being is

considered, minimizing negative impacts on their ability to earn a living.
Ensuring that the rights of local communities and Indigenous Peoples to
access and manage natural resources are respected while implementing
conservation measures is thus the way to go.
Conservation efforts should not disproportionately burden
marginalized or vulnerable groups. Integrating human rights helps ensure
that decisions are fair and just, preventing the exploitation of vulnerable
populations. The pursuit of environmental justice and equity in
conservation, including efforts to rectify historical injustices against
marginalized communities21 affected by conservation policies is
encouraged. Conservation efforts that ignore human rights considerations
may face resistance from communities, legal challenges, and public
backlash.22 For conservation efforts to be successful in the long term, they
must be embraced and supported by local communities. Integrating human
rights from the outset builds trust and cooperation, which are essential for
the sustained success of conservation initiatives.
Poorly planned conservation projects can result in the displacement of
communities from their ancestral lands, leading to conflicts and human rights
abuses,23 especially the rights of Indigenous peoples to their lands and resources.
Balancing conservation goals with human rights requires recognizing the
interdependence between nature and people. Integrating human rights
principles helps prevent such negative outcomes and promotes peaceful
coexistence between conservation efforts and local populations. In parallel,
addressing human rights issues related to climate-induced displacement,
including the rights of people who are forced to relocate due to environmental
changes caused by conservation initiatives is worth highlighting. Disregarding
human rights in conservation projects can lead to conflicts24 between
conservation organizations, local communities, governments, and other actors in
the conservation supply chain. Incorporating human rights principles can
mitigate these conflicts by promoting dialogue, collaboration, and mutual
understanding. It can also foster accountability among stakeholders, ensuring
that decision-making processes are transparent, and potential negative impacts
are identified and addressed.
Moreover, including local communities in conservation planning and
decision-making empowers them to become stewards of their own
21
Colchester, M., “Salvaging Nature: Indigenous Peoples, Protected Areas, and Biodiversity
Conservation” (2003), Forest Peoples Programme and World Rainforest Movement.
22
Dowie, M., “Conservation refugees: the hundred-year conflict between global conservation and
native peoples” (2011), MIT press.
23
FPP, “Indigenous Peoples and the World Bank: Experiences with Participation” 2011. Retrieved
from Forest Peoples Programme
<https://www.forestpeoples.org/sites/fpp/files/publication/2011/08/wbipsandparticipjul05eng.pdf,
24
Dowie, M., “Conservation refugees: the hundred-year conflict between global conservation and
native peoples” (2011), MIT press.
42

environments.25 This participatory approach has repeatedly proven to lead

to more effective and sustainable conservation outcomes. Human rights-
based conservation can (and has) support(ed) sustainable development by
promoting community involvement, capacity-building, and income-
generating opportunities.26 This approach has led to the empowerment of
marginalized groups and improved local well-being. By engaging with
local communities and considering their perspectives, conservation
practitioners have made more informed decisions.27 Local knowledge about
the environment, species, and ecosystem dynamics has significantly
enhanced the effectiveness of conservation strategies. Therefore, ensuring
that conservation decision-making processes actively involve local
communities, respect their rights, and include mechanisms for their
meaningful participation is essential.28
In summary, the intersection of human rights and environmental
conservation is dynamic and complex, requiring ongoing research, policy
development, and practice improvement to ensure that both conservation
goals and human rights are effectively and ethically addressed. Integrating
human rights considerations into conservation practices is not only a moral
imperative but also a practical necessity for achieving effective and
sustainable conservation outcomes. It requires collaboration, respect for
local knowledge, ensuring fairness, respecting cultural diversity and a
commitment to balancing environmental protection with the well-being
and rights of the communities that inhabit these areas.
3.8 The Role of International Human Rights Law in Guiding Conservation

Practices
Balancing conservation goals with the rights and well-being of local
communities and Indigenous peoples requires a thoughtful and inclusive
approach that recognizes the principles of human rights and incorporates
them into conservation practices. International human rights law provides a
framework for guiding conservation practices and serves as a model to
ensure that these principles are upheld in the context of conservation efforts.
Relevant treaties and conventions such as the UNDRIP and the 1972
Convention emphasize the rights of Indigenous peoples to their lands and
resources. Nevertheless, in as much as Conservation organizations and
governments should align their policies and actions with these international
human rights standards to ensure that conservation efforts are carried out in
a manner that respects and upholds human rights at the universal level, it is
25
Berkes, F., “Rethinking community-based conservation” (2004) 18 (3), Conservation Biology
621-630. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x.>
26
McDermott, M., Mahanty, S., & Schreckenberg, K., “Examining equity: a multidimensional
framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services” (2013) 33, Environmental
Science & Policy 416-427. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006>
27
Reed, M., “Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review” (2008)
141(10) Biological Conservation 2417-2431. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014>
28
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C., “Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural
resource conservation” (1999) 27 (4) World Development 629-649.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2>
43

paramount that they also create balance by adapting these standards to the
local, cultural and traditional realities on the ground, as the way of life in a
Namibian community located in the Kunene region may differ from that of
one located in the Zambezi region, or in an African community located
within Morocco, Guinea Bissau, Madagascar, Chad or Burundi. The same
applies to other geographies29.
4. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF A HUMAN RIGHTS DIRECTOR

IN CONSERVATION
4.1 Definition and Scope of the Human Rights Director Role in

Conservation
The role of a Human Rights Director in a conservation organization
involves ensuring that the organization's activities align with and respect
human rights principles. This includes both the rights of the people directly
impacted by conservation projects and the broader societal implications. The
scope of this role typically includes the steps in figure 5.30
Figure 5: Scope of the HRD role in Conservation
The sequence of boxes in figure 5 represents a logical and systematic

approach to a process that involves community or organizational
29
Moreover, the integration of factors associated with or resulting from various "Geographies of"
thematics within these cultural geographies introduces increased complexity.
30
This sequence attempts to follow a logical progression, starting with engaging relevant
stakeholders and the community, advocating for the cause, assessing associated risks, developing
policies, building capacity, ensuring compliance, addressing conflicts, and finally, monitoring,
evaluating, and reporting on the outcomes of the implemented policies and initiatives. Keep in
mind that the specific context and nature of the process might influence the optimal order of these
steps.
44

development, policy implementation, and evaluation. Hereunder an

explanation of the sequence and the rationale behind the order needs to be
added.
Initiating the process with stakeholder and community engagement
ensures that the perspectives, needs, and concerns of those affected by the
policies are considered from the outset. This inclusive approach helps in
building trust and obtaining valuable input. Following engagement,
advocacy is crucial for promoting the cause and gaining support. This stage
involves communicating the importance and benefits of the proposed
policies, garnering support from stakeholders and the community, and
creating a conducive environment for policy development.
Before developing policies, it's essential to assess the risks associated
with the proposed actions. Identifying potential challenges and risks allows
for the development of more informed and resilient policies. With a clear
understanding of stakeholder perspectives and associated risks, the
development of policies comes next. Policies are designed to address
specific issues, set guidelines, and provide a framework for action. Capacity
building is positioned after policy development to ensure that the
stakeholders and the community have the necessary skills, knowledge, and
resources to implement and adhere to the policies effectively. Once capacity
is built, ensuring compliance with the established policies becomes a
priority. This stage involves monitoring adherence to the policies and
addressing any deviations or challenges that may arise. Conflict resolution
is strategically placed in the sequence to address any conflicts or disputes
that may arise during the implementation of policies. This stage ensures
that potential barriers to successful policy implementation are identified
and addressed promptly. The final stages involve ongoing monitoring and
evaluation of the implemented policies. This includes assessing their
impact, effectiveness, and any unintended consequences. Reporting on
these outcomes is essential for transparency, accountability, and continuous
improvement. The rationale behind this sequence is to follow a logical
progression from initial engagement and advocacy through the various
stages of policy development, implementation, and evaluation. However,
it's crucial to recognize that the optimal order may be influenced by the
specific context, nature of the policies, and the dynamics of the community
or organization. Flexibility is key, and feedback loops should be integrated
to allow for adjustments based on evolving circumstances and feedback
from stakeholders.
The responsibilities/functions of a Human Rights Director in a
conservation organization are highlighted in figure 6.
4.2 Key Considerations for Establishing the Role of Human Rights

Director in Conservation Organizations
Establishing a cohesive framework for the Human Rights Director's
role begins with the paramount importance of clearly defining
responsibilities within the organization. This clarity lays the foundation for
effective collaboration and synergy. Moving beyond delineation, integration
45

with conservation goals becomes a pivotal step. It is imperative that the

Human Rights Director collaborates closely with conservation teams to align
human rights objectives seamlessly with the broader conservation goals. This
synergy ensures a unified approach, where the protection of human rights
becomes intrinsic to the success of conservation initiatives. Complementing
this integration is the commitment to capacity building. Providing the
necessary training and resources for Human Rights Directors and their team
is essential for cultivating the expertise required to navigate the complexities
of human rights integration effectively. This holistic approach, encompassing
role definition, integration with conservation goals, and capacity building,
forms a cohesive strategy to foster a symbiotic relationship between human
rights considerations and conservation objectives within the organizational
framework.
Policy Development and Integration Training and Education

• Embedding human rights considerations into the • Building the capacity of staff and partners to
organization's policies, strategies, and codes of understand and respect human rights principles
conduct. | Developing, implementing, and in conservation work. Providing training and
updating human rights policies and guidelines to educational resources on these principles and
guide the organization's conservation efforts. their application in conservation.
Risk Assessment Advocacy

• Conducting human rights impact assessments of • Advocating for the integration of human rights
conservation projects to identify potential risks to into conservation practices at all levels within the
local communities and Indigenous peoples. organization and for human rights considerations
in conservation planning and decision-making.
Compliance Community Engagement

• Ensuring the organization complies with relevant • Building relationships with local communities and
international and national laws and standards Indigenous groups to foster trust and
related to human rights in conservation. collaboration in conservation efforts.
Reporting Stakeholder Engagement

• Preparing and presenting reports to the • Engaging with local communities, Indigenous
organization's leadership and external peoples, and other stakeholders to understand
stakeholders on human rights progress and their human rights concerns and incorporate
challenges. their perspectives into conservation initiatives.
Monitoring and Evaluation Conflict Resolution

• Establishing mechanisms for monitoring and • Mediating conflicts that may arise between
reporting on the human rights impact of conservation goals and human rights concerns.
Figure 6: Responsibilities and functions of the HRD and strategies for

mainstreaming Human Rights in Conservation policies & practices
46

4.3 Review of Successful Models and Case Studies of Human Rights

Director Positions in Conservation Organizations
The role of a Human Rights Director within a conservation
organization is critical in ensuring that the organization's operations and
initiatives are aligned with human rights principles and ethical standards.
This review will analyse successful models and case studies of Human
Rights Director positions in conservation organizations, focusing on key
strategies and approaches employed by these directors and their
collaboration with internal and external stakeholders.
This involves studying existing Human Rights Director positions in
various conservation organizations to identify successful models and case
studies that demonstrate the positive impact of integrating human rights
into conservation efforts.
4.3.1 Successful Models and Case Studies

a) The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is committed to upholding human
rights principles and practices and commissioned its first human
rights policy in February 2022. As part of its commitments, TNC
through its Human Rights and Safeguards central unit, helps
establish and implement a Human Rights Due Diligence (HRRD)
framework31. The HRRD helps ensure that adverse human right
impacts of its initiatives are identified, prevented, mitigated, and
remedied.
b) The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
harnesses the experience, resources and reach of its 1,300 Member
organizations and the input of some 16,000 experts grouped in its
six expert Commissions: Species Survival, Environmental Law,
Protected Areas, Environmental, Economic and Social Policy,
Ecosystem Management and Education and Communication.32
c) The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) recognizes human rights
as central to achieving effective, equitable conservation and
development outcomes, and works to strengthen mainstreaming of
human rights, Indigenous Peoples' rights and empowerment of local
communities and civil society. The organization has an
Environmental and Social Safeguards and Social Policies Team,
comprised of positions including the Director of Safeguards and
Human Rights.33 It equally has a Conservation Quality Committee
that oversees and considers all potentially high-risk proposals; a
Human Rights Director and an IPLC Coordinator.
31
TNC, “Human Rights Guide for Working with Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities”
(n.d.). Retrieved from <https://www.tnchumanrightsguide.org/>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
32
IUCN, “IUCN Expert Commissions” (n.d.). Retrieved from <https://www.iucn.org/our-
union/expert-commissions>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
33
WWF, “WWF’s commitment to embed human rights in nature conservation: Updates and voices
from the WWF network” (2021, June 30). Retrieved from World Wildlife Fund:
<https://t.ly/krMxR>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
47

d) Rainforest Foundation US is known for its strong commitment to

human rights in the context of rainforest protection. They have a
dedicated Human Rights and Conservation Program Manager34
who plays a pivotal role in ensuring that Indigenous rights are
respected in all conservation efforts. This organization's success can
be attributed to their clear mandate for the Human Rights Director
and a robust system for monitoring and reporting human rights
violations in the regions they operate.
e) Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) has integrated human rights
into its conservation efforts, exemplified by the appointment of an
Executive Director of Rights & Communities Program.35 WCS
collaborates with local communities to protect wildlife habitats
while respecting their rights to land and resources. Their success lies
in the director's ability to establish trust with Indigenous
communities, ensuring they are not displaced or harmed in the
pursuit of conservation goals.
f) Conservation International (CI) has demonstrated a commitment to
human rights through its Community and Conservation; and Global
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion divisions.36 CI's success can be
attributed to their focus on community-based conservation37, where
they actively involve local stakeholders in decision-making
processes. This approach empowers communities to protect their
environment while safeguarding their rights.
g) BirdLife International is one of the seven members of The
Conservation Initiative on Human Rights, aimed at promoting the
integration of human rights in conservation policy and practice.38
h) Fauna & Flora International significantly contributed to the
development of INTRINSIC (Integrating Rights and Social Issues
into Conservation: A Trainers Guide),39 and has a long history of
working with communities in biodiversity-rich landscapes to enable
34
RFUS, “2022 Annual Report” (2022). Retrieved from Rainforest Foundation US:
<https://rainforestfoundation.org/about/financials-transparency/2022-annual-report/>, accessed on
23 November 2023.
35
WCS, “Sushil Raj Joins WCS as New Executive Director of Rights & Communities Program”
(2022, February 3). Retrieved from Wildlife Conservation Society: <https://t.ly/wtxAn>, accessed
on 23 November 2023.
36
CI, “Senior Staff” (2023). Retrieved from Conservation International:
<https://www.conservation.org/about/senior-staff>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
37
CI, “Respecting Human Rights” (n.d.). Retrieved from Conservation International:
<https://www.conservation.org/priorities/human-rights>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
38
CIHR, “The Conservation Initiative on Human Rights (CIHR)” (2016). Retrieved from
<https://www.thecihr.org/>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
39
Cambridge Conservation, “INTRINSIC: Integrating rights and social issues in conservation”
(n.d.). Retrieved from Cambridge Conservation:
<https://www.cambridgeconservation.org/project/intrinsic-integrating-rights-and-social-issues-in-
conservation/>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
48

them to act as effective custodians of their precious, yet threatened,

natural resources.40
4.4 Analysis of Key Strategies Employed by Human Rights Directors

Human Rights Directors play a critical role as catalysts for change
within the conservation industry, employing various tools and methods to
ensure ethical and socially responsible outcomes. This section categorises
approaches they use to effectively integrate human rights considerations
into the fabric of conservation practices, shedding light on the nuanced
methodologies they utilize, spanning community engagement, advocacy
efforts, training initiatives, and impact assessments. Some key strategies are
illustrated in figure 7.
1. Community Engagement: Human Rights Directors actively engage
with local communities to understand their perspectives, needs, and
concerns. By fostering open dialogue and collaboration, they work towards
co-designing conservation initiatives that respect and incorporate
community values. This participatory approach ensures that conservation
efforts are culturally sensitive and inclusive, thereby promoting sustainable
outcomes.
Figure 7: Four key strategies and approaches of Human Right Directors
2. Advocacy Efforts: Champions of human rights within the conservation

sector, these directors advocate for policies and practices that prioritize the
well-being of both ecosystems and local populations. Through partnerships
with governmental bodies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and
international agencies, they work to influence legislation and promote
frameworks that uphold human rights standards within the context of
3. Training Initiatives: Human Rights Directors play a crucial role in
developing and implementing training programs for conservation
professionals. These initiatives focus on building awareness and
understanding of human rights principles, emphasizing the importance of
40
Fauna & Flora, “Livelihoods Governance” (n.d.). Retrieved from Fauna & Flora:
<https://www.fauna-flora.org/expertise/livelihoods-governance/>, accessed on 23 November
2023.
49

respectful collaboration with local communities. By enhancing the skills of

conservation practitioners, they contribute to a workforce that is well-
versed in ethical and socially responsible practices.
4. Impact Assessments: Employing rigorous impact assessment
methodologies, these directors evaluate the social consequences of
conservation initiatives. This involves examining how projects affect local
communities, considering factors such as livelihoods, cultural practices, and
access to resources. The insights gained from these assessments inform
decision-making processes, allowing for the refinement of conservation
strategies to better align with human rights principles.
5. Figure 7 (above) illustrates some of the key strategies employed by
Human Rights Directors in the conservation industry. These strategies
encompass community engagement, advocacy efforts, training initiatives,
and impact assessments, showcasing the interconnected nature of their
multifaceted approach. The figure visually encapsulates the interconnected
nature of these strategies, demonstrating how they work synergistically to
create a holistic framework for integrating human rights into conservation
practices. It serves as a visual guide, emphasizing the collaborative and
interdependent relationships between these key strategies. In summary,
Human Rights Directors in the conservation industry serve as architects of
positive change, employing a strategic blend of community engagement,
advocacy, training, and impact assessments. Their efforts contribute to the
development of conservation practices that not only safeguard ecosystems
but also respect and uphold the fundamental rights of the communities
intertwined with these environments.
4.5 Collaboration with Internal and External Stakeholders

Collaboration is essential for the success of a Human Rights Director in
conservation organizations. This includes working closely with internal teams
such as conservationists, researchers, and policymakers, as well as external
stakeholders like local communities, Indigenous groups, private actors,
government agencies, and NGOs to ensure a holistic and rights-based
approach to conservation. Figure 8 depicts the notions of collaborations.
Figure 8: Types of Human Rights related collaborations in Conservation
50

In conclusion, the role of Human Rights Directors in conservation

organizations is vital for harmonizing conservation efforts with human
rights principles. Successful models and case studies demonstrate that a
holistic approach, including community engagement, impact assessments,
advocacy, and collaboration with stakeholders, is essential for achieving
sustainable conservation outcomes while respecting human rights. The
effectiveness of Human Rights Directors is not only in their strategies but
also in their ability to bridge the gap between conservation and human
rights, ultimately leading to positive outcomes for both. Overall, the role of
a Human Rights Director in conservation is multifaceted and requires a
strong commitment to human rights principles, collaboration, and a deep
understanding of both conservation and human rights issues.
5. BEST PRACTICES AND CASE STUDIES
5.1 Successful Models for Integrating Human Rights in Conservation Projects

In the dynamic landscape of conservation, the synergy between
environmental sustainability and the rights of local communities has
become a focal point of progressive approaches. Recognizing the limitations
of traditional conservation models, and the intrinsic link between the well-
being of local communities and the success of conservation initiatives has
led to the development of innovative models that integrate human rights
into the very fabric of conservation practices. The shift towards community-
centred approaches not only acknowledges the rights of individuals and
communities but also taps into the wealth of traditional knowledge that has
sustained ecosystems for generations. The paradigm shift that has occurred
emphasizes collaboration, empowerment, and shared responsibility in
achieving sustainability and win-win conservation outcomes. Within this
framework, several models have emerged as successful strategies for
harmonizing conservation goals with human rights principles. This
includes community-based conservation, co-management agreements, and
the adoption of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) as a central
Community-Based
Conservation FPIC
Co-Management
Agreements
Figure 9: Top 3 practices for integrating Human Rights in Conservation

initiatives
51

element in conservation projects. Each of these approaches serves as a

testament to the transformative power of inclusive, rights-based
conservation practices that foster mutual respect and cooperation among
diverse stakeholders.
Examples41 include the creation of community-managed bio-diverse
areas where the rights of these communities are respected while achieving
conservation goals. Other examples42 include the (a) establishment of co-
41
Uganda: UWA, “Bwindi Impenetrable National Park” (2018). Retrieved from Uganda Wildlife
Authority: <https://ugandawildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Bwindi-cc-2018-2.pdf>,
accessed on 23 November 2023; UNDESA, “State of the World's Indigenous Peoples -
ST/ESA/328” (2009). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
<https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/node/1046/pdf?year=2020>, accessed on 23 November
2023; India: <https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Community-forest-
management_an-Opportunity_EN.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023; JICA-MoEF, “Joint
Forest Management: A Handbook” (2012). India's Ministry of Environment and Forests
<https://ifs.nic.in/Dynamic/pdf/JFM%20handbook.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023; JPS
Associates, “Joint Forest Management (JFM)” (2015). JPS Associates (P) Ltd.
<https://www.mpforest.gov.in/img/files/HRD_HandBook_E.pdf>, accessed on 23 November
2023; Cameroon (1): IIED, 2017 <https://www.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/G04191.pdf>,
accessed on 23 November 2023; Moutoni, L., “Community Forestry in Cameroon – an overview
of the community perspective” (2019). Forest Peoples Programme, London; Vukenkeng A.
Wujung, Cornelius M. Lambi, Dobdinga Fonchamnyo, Forbe H. Ngangnchi & Ibrahim M.
Muafueshiangha, “Community Life around Protected Areas in Cameroon: Conservation Story of
Erat and the Resettlement Communities around the Korup National Park” (2018) 6 (9). Universal
Journal of Management 295-303; Peru: Lozano, R. M., “Forests with History: Exploring the
Social Effects of the Creation of the Cordillera Azul National Park on the Chzutino People of
Amazonian Peru” (2013). Retrieved from PhD Dissertation - University of Florida
<https://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/E0/04/52/08/00001/MENDOZA_LOZANO_R.pdf>,
accessed on 23 November 2023; The Field Museum, “Parque Nacional Cordillera Azul” (n.d.).
Retrieved from <https://fieldguides.fieldmuseum.org/sites/default/files/rapid-color-guides-
pdfs/117_Azul-Landscapes_0.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023; Ethiopia: Kamski, B., “The
Kuraz Sugar Development Project (OTuRN Briefing Note 1)” (2016). Lansing, Michigan: Omo-
Turkana Research Network <https://www.canr.msu.edu/oturn/OTuRN_Briefing_Note_1.pdf>,
accessed on 23 November 2023; Demeke, A., “The Omo-Kuraz Sugar Development Project”
(n.d.). Retrieved from Aiga Forum <https://www.aigaforum.com/articles/The-Omo-Kraz-Sugar-
development-Project-English.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
42
Cameroon(2) & Philippines: WWF, “Embedding Human Rights in Nature Conservation: From
Intent to Action” (2022). Retrieved from World Wildlife Fund
<https://www.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-PDF/WWF/WWF-INT-Human-Rights-
and-The-Environment-Report-2022.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023; Schultz, T.
“Tubbataha Reefs Primer: 7th Edition” (2017). Retrieved from <https://tubbatahareefs.org/>,
<https://tubbatahareefs.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/TRNP-7th-Edition-Primer.pdf>;
Mozambique: “Quirimbas Archipelago Hope Spot” (n.d.). Retrieved from
<https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/70f22595f3524efba056cb384309ec0c?play=true&speed=medi
um>, accessed on 23 November 2023; Kenya(1): Pertet, F. “Kenya's Experience in Establishing
Coastal and Marine Protected Areas” (n.d.), USAID <https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnaat749.pdf>
accessed on 23 November 2023; USAID, “COMFISH Project” (2014),
<https://www.crc.uri.edu/download/COMFISH-FY2014WP-FINALEnglish_508.pdf>, accessed
on 23 November 2023; USAID, “Senegal Biodiversity and Tropical Forests Assessments” (2008),
<https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnadl464.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023; Gabon: UNEP,
“Mangroves of Western and Central Africa” (2007) UNEP-Regional Seas Programme/UNEP-
WCMC; Carl, C., Trettin, Zhaohua Dai, Wenwu Tang, David Lagomasino, Nathan Thomas,
Seung K. Lee, Marc Simard, Médard O. Ebanega, Atticus Stoval, & Temilola E. Fatoyinbo,
“Mangrove carbon stocks in Pongara National Park, Gabon” (2021) 259: 107432, Estuarine,
Coastal and Shelf Science; Ecuador: IIED, “Markets for Watershed Services-Country Profile”
(2006-2008), <https://watershedmarkets.org/documents/Ecuador_Pimampiro_E.pdf>, accessed on
52

management agreements, which are collaborative agreements between

governments, conservation organizations, and local communities that have
shown success in integrating human rights and conservation. They ensure
that the rights of IPLCs are respected, and they often involve revenue-
sharing mechanisms from tourism or resource use; and (b) incorporation of
FPIC as a central element in conservation projects. As seen in various
initiatives and already discussed above, FPIC helps build trust and respect
for human rights.
Table 2: Examples of community-based conservation models

Payment for • Programs compensate communities for
Ecosystem Services maintaining or enhancing ecosystem services.
(PES): • For instance, the Pimampiro watershed project
in Ecuador pays local communities for
reforestation efforts, which contribute to water
conservation and quality improvement.
• The Mau Forest Complex in Kenya(3) has
witnessed PES initiatives where communities
are compensated for protecting water
catchment areas. This helps ensure the
maintenance of vital ecosystem services,
including water provision and biodiversity
conservation.
• The Chyulu Hills landscape in Kenya(4) is part
of a REDD+ project where communities
receive payments for carbon sequestration
efforts. This initiative contributes to both
climate change mitigation and community
development.
23 November 2023; Kenya(3,4) Chyulu Hills REDD+, “Annual Report” (2022),

<http://maasaiwilderness.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/2022-CHRP-Annual-Report_KEN-
FINAL.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023; Government of Kenya, “Rehabilitation of the Mau
Forest Ecosystem” (2009), <https://www.kws.go.ke/file/1446/download?token=xDBvXH_o>,
accessed on 23 November 2023; Joram K. Kagombe, Joshua K. Cheboiwo, Alfred Gichu, Collins
Handa, & Jane Wamboi, “Payment for environmental services: status and opportunities in Kenya”
(2018) 40 Journal of Resources Development and Management Journal; Namibia: Lendelvo, S.,
Suich, H., & Mfune, J. K., “Stakeholders' Perceptions of the Outcomes of Translocated Eland in
Nyae Nyae Conservancy” (2022) 3 Frontiers in Conservation Science, 783951; Helge
Denker, Namibian Association of Community-Based Natural Resource Management Support
Organisations, “Living with Wildlife: The Story of Namibia’s Communal Conservancies” (2011)
NACSO, Windhoek, Namibia, <https://search.worldcat.org/title/756058205>; UNEP, “Torra
Conservancy” (2012) Equator Initiative Case Study Series. New York, NY,
<https://www.equatorinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/case_1348261012.pdf>, accessed on
23 November 2023; NACSO, “State of Conservation in Namibia Reports” (n.d.),
<https://www.nacso.org.na/resources/state-of-community-conservation>, accessed on 23 November
2023; Nepal: NTNC, “Sustainable Tourism Enhancement In Nepal's Protected Areas” (2020). World
Bank/National Trust for Nature Conservancy,
<https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/ar/868261557894835773/pdf/Environmental-and-Social-
Management-Framework.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023; NTNC, “Annapurna Conservation
Area Project (ACAP)” (n.d.). Retrieved from <https://ntnc.org.np/project/annapurna-conservation-area-
project-acap>, accessed on 23 November 2023.
53

Community- • In this model, local communities play a central

Managed Protected role in the management and protection of
Areas (CMPAs): designated conservation areas. They actively
participate in decision-making processes,
enforcement of rules, and sustainable resource
use. The Bwindi Impenetrable National Park
in Uganda, where local communities are
involved in managing gorilla conservation, is
an example of a successful CMPA. For
instance, revenue generated from gorilla
trekking permits is shared with local
communities, creating economic incentives for
both conservation and community
development.
Community Forest • CFM involves local communities in the
Management (CFM): sustainable management of forest resources,
combining traditional knowledge with
modern conservation practices. India's Joint
Forest Management (JFM) program is a
notable example, where communities
collaborate with government agencies to
manage and protect forests, ensuring both
ecological health and local livelihoods. In
Cameroon(1), initiatives such as the
Community Forest Management approach
involve local communities in the sustainable
management of forests. The Korup Rainforest
Conservation Society works with local
communities to protect the rich biodiversity of
the Korup National Park.
Indigenous and • ICCAs recognize the role of Indigenous
Community Peoples and local communities in conserving
Conserved Areas biodiversity and maintaining ecosystems.
(ICCAs): These areas are often managed based on
traditional practices and local governance
systems. The Quechua Lamista community's
conservation efforts in the Cordillera Azul
National Park in Peru showcase the
effectiveness of ICCAs. In Ethiopia, the ICCA
in the Lower Omo Valley is home to several
Indigenous communities. This area is
culturally, and ecologically significant, and
local communities actively engage in
conserving their land, preserving biodiversity,
maintaining traditional practices, and
sustaining livelihoods through initiatives such
54

as the Omo-Kuraz Sugar Development Project.

Finally, the Baka people in Cameroon(2) are
involved in the management of Lobéké
National Park. This ICCA is not only a prime
example of integrating traditional knowledge
and community involvement into
conservation practices, but it is also one of
resilience and self-determination, as they
sought rectification of past injustices for
decades. Like the Noongar people of
Australia, the Baka are a benchmark for
Indigenous self-government and autonomy.
Marine Protected • In some coastal regions, community-based
Areas with marine conservation efforts involve local
Community fishing communities in the management of
Involvement: marine resources. The Tubbataha Reefs
Natural Park in the Philippines incorporates
the knowledge and involvement of local
communities in protecting coral reefs and
marine life. In Mozambique, Vamizi Island is
part of the Quirimbas Archipelago National
Park. Local communities are involved in
sustainable tourism and marine resource
management, ensuring the protection of coral
reefs and marine biodiversity while benefiting
economically. Local communities around
Kenya(1)'s Watamu Marine National Park
actively participate in its management and
community members are involved in coral reef
monitoring, sustainable fishing practices, and
tourism activities, promoting both
conservation and livelihoods. In Senegal's Joal-
Fadiouth Community Marine Protected Area,
local communities are engaged in fisheries
management, mangrove conservation, and
ecotourism, showcasing the importance of
community involvement in coastal
conservation. Least but not the last, in Gabon,
parks situated in the bay of Mono, mouth of
Como, Pongara, Loango, Moukalaba-Doudou
National Park, Ivindo, and la Lobe are theatres
of mangroves conservation initiatives.
Community • Namibia has been at the forefront of
Conservancies: implementing various community-based
conservation models, including its flagship
and globally acclaimed community
55

conservancy program, which involves local

communities in the management of wildlife
and natural resources. By giving communities
the rights to manage and benefit from wildlife,
the model has led to increased conservation
efforts and economic opportunities. Examples
among many others in the Kunene region
include the Nyae Nyae Conservancy and the
Torra Conservancy, where traditional land
and resource rights are respected. In Kenya(2),
community-based natural resource
management initiatives empower local
communities to conserve biodiversity and
manage their natural resources sustainably.
The Maasai Mara Conservancies, where local
communities are involved in wildlife
conservation and eco-tourism, is a notable
example.
Ecotourism • Community-based eco-tourism projects
Initiatives: involve local communities in the sustainable
use of natural resources while providing
economic benefits. The Annapurna
Conservation Area Project in Nepal involves
local communities in managing tourism
activities, ensuring that the environmental
impact is minimized, and the benefits are
shared with the community. Several
community-based projects in South Africa
focus on sustainable tourism as a means of
conservation. The Grootbos Private Nature
Reserve is an example where local
communities are involved in eco-tourism
initiatives, emphasizing the conservation of
the fynbos biome. In Malawi, the management
of Liwonde National Park involves
collaboration with local communities. This
includes anti-poaching efforts, community-
based resource management, and revenue-
sharing from tourism activities to support
local development. The Khama Rhino
Sanctuary in Botswana is a community-based
conservation project focuses on the protection
of rhinos and involves local communities in
tourism-related activities. The revenue
generated supports both conservation and
community development initiatives.
56

Table 3: Examples of co-management agreements and FPIC implementation

Co-Management • In Zimbabwe, a pioneering co-management
Agreements: initiative - the Communal Areas Management
Involving local Programme for Indigenous Resources
communities in (CAMPFIRE) Program - has allowed local
decision-making communities to benefit economically from
processes and wildlife conservation. Through revenue-
benefit-sharing sharing mechanisms, communities benefit
arrangements has from ecotourism, hunting, and other
been a successful resource-use activities. It demonstrates how
model. Examples conservation can respect local rights and
include the following: provide economic incentives.
• In Zanzibar, the co-management of Jozani-
Chwaka Bay National Park involves
collaboration between the government, local
communities, and NGOs. The park is known
for its rich biodiversity, including the
endangered Zanzibar red colobus monkey.
Revenue-sharing mechanisms from tourism
activities contribute to community
development and conservation efforts.
• NGOs such as African Parks and the African
Wildlife Foundation (AWF) co-manage
African parks with African governments.
• In Venezuela, the co-management agreement
in the Imataca Forest Reserve involves
Indigenous Peoples, the government, and
NGOs. This agreement aims to balance
conservation with the traditional practices of
Indigenous communities, ensuring their
rights are respected while supporting
sustainable resource use.
• The co-management agreement in Yaeda
Valley involves the Hadzabe and Datoga
Indigenous communities. These communities
actively participate in the management of the
Yaeda Valley, ensuring the sustainable use of
natural resources and respecting their
traditional rights. Revenue-sharing from
tourism activities supports community well-
being and conservation.
• The Mara Naboisho Conservancy in Kenya is
an example of a co-management agreement
between local Maasai communities, the
government, and conservation organizations.
The conservancy allows for sustainable
57

wildlife management and tourism activities,

with revenue-sharing arrangements
benefiting local communities and supporting
conservation initiatives.
• The Sengwer Indigenous Peoples in Kenya's
Embobut Forest have been involved in a
notable case regarding Free, Prior, and
Informed Consent (FPIC). The Kenya Forest
Service and other stakeholders sought to
evict the Sengwer from the forest for
conservation purposes. However, the
Sengwer argued that their FPIC was not
adequately sought before such actions,
emphasizing the importance of respecting the
rights and consent of Indigenous
communities in conservation initiatives.
• Namibia has incorporated FPIC into its
community-based natural resource
management initiatives. The conservancy
model, such as those in the Namibian
Protected Area Network, involves obtaining
the free, prior, and informed consent of local
communities before establishing conservation
areas. This approach aims to balance
conservation goals with the rights and needs
of Indigenous and local communities.
• The Bougainville Conservation Initiative,
which focuses on marine conservation in
Papua New Guinea, incorporates FPIC into
its framework. This initiative works with
local communities on the island of
Bougainville to obtain their consent before
implementing marine conservation strategies.
This ensures that the conservation efforts
align with the needs and preferences of the
local communities.
• Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), while not
a specific project, is an example of an
organization that promotes FPIC in forestry
and conservation. The FSC certification
standards require that forest management
activities, including conservation initiatives,
respect the rights of Indigenous peoples and
local communities. This involves obtaining
their free, prior, and informed consent for
forest management practices.
58

Free, Prior, and • Organizations that obtain FPIC before

Informed Consent implementing conservation activities tend to
(FPIC): have more positive outcomes.
The transformative perspectives discussed in tables 2 and 3

exemplify43 the evolving landscape where conservation and human rights
are not mutually exclusive but rather intricately linked components of a
harmonious and ethical approach to environmental stewardship. This shift
is not just a conceptual change but a practical one, demonstrating tangible
success in achieving both conservation goals and safeguarding the rights of
those directly affected.
5.2 Case Studies Highlighting Effective Approaches to Respecting

Human Rights in Conservation
In Australia, the Ngaanyatjarra Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara
Women's Council Aboriginal Corporation (NPY Women's Council)44 has
successfully combined traditional Indigenous knowledge with modern
conservation techniques to manage natural resources sustainably,
respecting the rights and roles of Indigenous women. In South Africa, the
43
South Africa: CAPE, “People Making Biodiversity Work” (2006). Cape Action for People and the
Environment (SANBI Biodiversity Series 4).
<https://www.cepf.net/sites/default/files/fynbos_fynmense.pdf>, accessed on 15 November 2023;
Malawi: USAID, “Community Based Natural Resource Management Stocktaking Assessment
Malawi Profile” (2010), <https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00JRSD.pdf>, accessed on 15
November 2023; Botswana: UNEP/GEF, “Communities Conserving Wildlife” (2021).
<https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/publications/GEF_SGP_Communities_Conserving_Wi
ldlife_2021.pdf>, accessed on 15 November 2023; Zimbabwe: King, L., “Inter-Organisational
Dynamics in Natural Resource Management” (n.d.). Retrieved from USAID
<https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnabx926.pdf>, accessed on 15 November 2023; Zanzibar: GEF,
“The Nature and Role of Local Benefits in GEF programme Areas: Case Study Tanzania –
Zanzibar” (2014). <https://www.gefieo.org/sites/default/files/documents/lb-case-study-tanzania-
zanzibar.pdf>, accessed on 15 November 2023; African Parks, “Travel Africa and Visit the
Parks” (n.d.). Retrieved from <https://www.africanparks.org/visit-parks>, accessed on 15
November 2023; AWF, “Where We Work” (n.d.). Retrieved from African Wildlife Foundation
<https://www.awf.org/where-we-work>, accessed on 15 November 2023; Venezuela: FAO/GEF,
“Sustainable Forest Lands Management and Conservation under an Ecosocial Approach” (2021).
Retrieved from https://docplayer.net/222301167-Fao-gef-project-implementation-report-2021-
revised-template-1-basic-project-data.html#google_vignette>, accessed on 15 November 2023; Mara
Naboisho: EduAfrica. (n.d.). Mara Naboisho Conservancy Case Study: Nature vs People.
Retrieved from <https://edu-africa.com/students-abroad/mara-naboisho-conservancy-case-study/>,
accessed on 15 November 2023; Swenger/Embobut Forest: Amnesty International, “Families
Torn: Apart Forced Eviction of Indigenous People in Embotut Forest, Kenya” (2021). Retrieved
from <https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-
content/uploads/2021/05/AFR3283402018ENGLISH.pdf>, accessed on 15 November 2023;
Papua New Guinea: Papua New Guinea Conservation and Environment Protection Authority,
“National Biodiversity Strategic Action Plan: 2019-2024” (2019). Retrieved from
<https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/pg/pg-nbsap-v2-en.pdf>, accessed on 15 November 2023; FSC,
“FSC Guidelines for the Implementation of the Right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC)”
(2021). Forest Stewardship Council <https://fsc.org/en/document-centre/documents/retrieve/e3adfb1d-
f2ed-4e36-a171-6864c96f0d76>, accessed on 15 November 2023.
44
NPY Women's Council, “NPY Women’s Council is led by women’s law, authority and culture to
deliver health, social and cultural services for all Anangu” (n.d.). Retrieved from Ngaanyatjarra
Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Women’s Council Aboriginal Corporation
<https://www.npywc.org.au/>, accessed on 15 November 2023.
59

Makuleke Community45 regained their ancestral land and established the

Makuleke Contractual Park, where they have partnered with a private
company for ecotourism. This partnership respects the rights and benefits
of the Makuleke people while conserving biodiversity. Scalise's 2012 report
on Indigenous women's land rights in Africa46 and the WWF et al.‘s 2020
technical review on the state of Indigenous Peoples‘ and Local
Communities‘ lands and territories47 further highlight additional case
studies that underscore the importance of recognizing and respecting the
rights of Indigenous women in conservation and land management. The
examples presented in these reports likely showcase diverse approaches
that involve Indigenous peoples in decision-making processes, emphasizing
the intersectionality of gender, culture, and land rights.
5.3 Challenges Encountered in Implementing Human Rights-Based

Conservation Initiatives
Navigating the intricate balance between conservation objectives and
the rights of local communities presents a formidable challenge, often
entailing conflicting interests and potential cultural clashes. The effective
engagement of communities is hindered by resource limitations, both in
funding and skilled personnel, exacerbating the struggle to harmonize
conservation efforts with human rights principles. Amidst these challenges,
addressing legal and policy barriers and empowering local communities are
imperative for fostering a harmonious coexistence between conservation
initiatives and human rights.
Table 4: Challenges encountered in implementing Human Rights-based

conservation initiatives
Complex • Conservation projects often involve numerous
Stakeholder stakeholders with diverse interests. Balancing
Dynamics these interests while respecting human rights can
be challenging, requiring skilled negotiation and
diplomacy.
Capacity Building • Local communities may lack the capacity to
engage effectively in conservation projects.
Providing training and support is crucial to
ensuring that they can fully participate and
benefit from these initiatives.
45
De Villiers, B., “Land Claims & National Parks” (1999). The Human Sciences Research Council
(HSRC). Retrieved from <https://www.hsrcpress.ac.za/books/land-claims-national-parks>,
46
Scalise, E., “Indigenous Women's Land Rights: Case Studies from Africa” (2012). In State of the
World’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples. <https://minorityrights.org/wp-content/uploads/old-
site-downloads/download-1117-Indigenous-womens-land-rights-case-studies-from-Africa.pdf>,
47
WWF, “The State of Indigenous Peoples’ and Local Communities’ lands and Territories” (2021).
Gland, Switzerland: WWF, UNEP-WCMC, SGP/ICCA-GSI, LM.
<https://wwflac.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/report_the_state_of_the_indigenous_peoples_and
_local_communities_lands_and_territories_1.pdf>, accessed on 15 November 2023.
60

Long-Term • Sustainable conservation efforts often require

Commitment long-term engagement, and maintaining support
and funding over time can be difficult.
Adaptation and • Conservation strategies must be adaptable to
Flexibility changing circumstances, including climate
change and evolving human rights standards.
Monitoring and • Robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms
Evaluation are necessary to assess the impact of conservation
projects on human rights and adjust strategies
accordingly.
Overall, best practices in integrating human rights into conservation

projects often involve meaningful engagement with local communities, a
commitment to long-term partnerships, and flexibility in adapting to
changing conditions and needs. Case studies can provide valuable insights
into how these practices are applied in real-world scenarios.
6. INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORKS AND GUIDELINES
6.1 Relevance of International Conventions and Agreements to the Role

of Human Rights Director
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) sets out
fundamental human rights principles, including the right to life, liberty,
and security, which are directly relevant to the role of a Human Rights
Director in conservation. Ensuring that conservation projects do not infringe
upon these rights is a fundamental responsibility. Also, the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) treaties outline
a wide range of human rights, including the right to self-determination, the
right to participation in cultural life, and the right to an adequate standard of
living. A Human Rights Director must consider these rights when planning
and implementing conservation projects. On one hand, the Convention on
Biological Diversity (CBD) recognizes the importance of respecting the rights
and traditional knowledge of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in
biodiversity conservation. Human Rights Directors can draw from the CBD's
principles to guide their work. On the other hand, the United Nations
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) explicitly
addresses the rights of Indigenous Peoples, including their right to free,
prior, and informed consent (FPIC) in matters affecting them. A Human
Rights Director must ensure that conservation initiatives respect the rights
enshrined in UNDRIP.
61

6.2 Guidelines and Standards for Integrating Human Rights in

Conservation Practices
The IUCN's (a) guidelines for recognising and reporting other
effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs)48 and (b) principles
and guidelines on Indigenous and traditional peoples49 and protected
areas50 provide a framework for recognizing and respecting the rights of
Indigenous Peoples and local communities in conservation, including FPIC
principles. Other principles, such as the Equator Principles51 provide a
framework for financial institutions to assess and manage environmental
and social risks in project finance, including conservation projects. Human
Rights Directors can use them to ensure that conservation initiatives meet
international human rights standards. Finally, the Conservation Initiative
on Human Rights (CIHR)52 developed a set of principles to guide
conservation organizations in integrating human rights into their work.
These principles provide practical guidance for Human Rights Directors.
6.3 Examples of Initiatives and Tools that Support Human Rights-Based

Conservation Approaches
Several resources and initiatives offer valuable tools and approaches
for Human Rights Directors engaged in conservation planning. The
LandMark Initiative,53 launched by the World Resources Institute (WRI),
provides an online platform mapping and tracking the collective land rights
of Indigenous Peoples and local communities globally. This tool proves
instrumental for Human Rights Directors seeking to comprehend and
respect land and resource rights during conservation planning.
Additionally, various CBNRM models, exemplified by CFM applications in
Asia, Latin America, and Africa, illustrate how local communities can
actively participate in and benefit from conservation efforts while
safeguarding their rights. Another noteworthy approach is the
Sustainability Transformation Approach54 of the FAO, grounded in the
interconnected pillars of social, environmental, and economic sustainability.
This approach, comprising nine expected transformations relevant for
climate change sustainability, integrates gender and Indigenous people‘s
rights and knowledge as cross-cutting issues, addressing policy,
governance, and practical decisions. Furthermore, the World Bank
48
<https://www.iucn.org/news/protected-areas/201911/iucn-publishes-new-guidance-recognising-
reporting-and-supporting-other-effective-area-based-conservation-measures>
49
<https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/issues/indigenouspeoples/sr/callforinputcovidrecove
rysubmissions/2022-07-28/IUCN_%20SubmissiontoOHCHRProtectedAreasandConservation.pdf>
50
<https://files.worldwildlife.org/wwfcmsprod/files/Publication/file/4d021q9e2_WWFBinaryitem605
3.pdf>
51
<https://equator-principles.com/>
52
<https://www.thecihr.org/publications>
53
WRI, “RELEASE: New LandMark Data Measure Impacts of Indigenous Peoples and Local
Communities on Forests and Climate” (2017, December 2020). Retrieved from World Resources
Institute <https://www.wri.org/news/release-new-landmark-data-measure-impacts-indigenous-
peoples-and-local-communities-forests-and>, accessed on 15 November 2023.
54
<https://www.fao.org/dryland-forestry/news/news-detail/en/c/1635568/>
62

Environmental and Social Framework55 outlines policies and procedures for

assessing and mitigating environmental and social risks in projects,
providing valuable insights for Human Rights Directors involved in
conservation initiatives. The UNDP Social and Environmental Standards56
also offer guidance on integrating environmental, social, and human rights
considerations into development and conservation projects. These diverse
resources collectively equip Human Rights Directors with a comprehensive
set of tools and frameworks to navigate the intricate intersection of
conservation and human rights. As further discussed in table 5 below,
incorporating these international frameworks, guidelines, and tools into
conservation practices is essential for Human Rights Directors to ensure that
their work aligns with global human rights standards and principles while
striving for effective conservation outcomes.
7. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIPS
7.1 Importance of Engaging with Indigenous Peoples, Local Communities,

and Other Stakeholders
Respecting rights and knowledge stands as a foundational principle
in effective conservation practice. Indigenous Peoples and local
communities bring profound knowledge of their environments, crucial for
successful conservation outcomes. By engaging with them, not only are
their rights respected, but their expertise is leveraged, fostering more
sustainable conservation approaches. Building trust emerges as a key
component in this process, particularly with stakeholders directly impacted
by conservation projects. Inclusion in decision-making processes and
recognition of their rights, including the principle of free, prior, and
informed consent (FPIC), are instrumental in establishing trust and
cooperation. Additionally, legal, and ethical obligations underscore the
importance of involving Indigenous Peoples and local communities in
conservation initiatives, as mandated by international agreements and
national laws. Neglecting this engagement can lead to legal and ethical
complications. Finally, recognizing the significance of local support
emphasizes that engaging with communities not only garners their support
for conservation efforts but also increases the likelihood of their active
participation in and protection of natural resources. In this cohesive
narrative, these principles intertwine to advocate for an inclusive, ethical,
and legally compliant approach to conservation that ensures the well-being
of both communities and the environment.
Table 5: Collaborative approaches for integrating Human Rights

perspectives in Conservation
Co-Management • Collaborative approaches involve shared
and Governance: decision-making and management
55
<https://www.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/environmental-and-social-framework>
56
<https://www.undp.org/publications/undp-social-and-environmental-standards>
63

responsibilities between conservation

organizations, governments, and local
communities. This allows for the integration of
human rights perspectives and ensures that all
stakeholders have a voice.
Community-Based • Empowering local communities to actively
Conservation participate in conservation planning and
implementation can help ensure that human
rights are respected. This often involves
developing sustainable resource management
plans in collaboration with these communities.
Conflict Resolution • Establishing mechanisms for addressing
Mechanisms conflicts and grievances is essential.
Collaborative approaches should include
dispute resolution processes that respect the
rights of all parties involved.
Capacity Building • Building the capacity of local communities and
stakeholders to engage effectively in
conservation efforts and advocate for their
rights is a critical element of collaborative
approaches.
7.2 Partnerships with Human Rights Organizations, Academic

Institutions, and Other Relevant Actors
Engaging in collaborative efforts with a variety of stakeholders and
forging partnerships with organizations and institutions with expertise in
the subject under scrutiny can significantly enhance the human rights
dimensions of conservation initiatives. Human rights organizations, as
valuable allies, bring expertise and advocacy support, ensuring that
conservation projects align with human rights standards and raising
awareness of potential violations. Academic institutions, through research
and data-driven insights, contribute to a more informed understanding of
the human rights aspects of conservation, aiding in the development of best
practices and evidence-based approaches. Their scholarly contributions
help refine strategies for addressing human rights concerns within
conservation frameworks. Local NGOs, intimately familiar with cultural
and social contexts, are crucial partners for effective engagement with
Indigenous Peoples and local communities, fostering a more inclusive and
culturally sensitive conservation approach. By actively involving these
organizations, conservation initiatives can benefit from on-the-ground
knowledge and community perspectives, ensuring a more comprehensive
and people-centred strategy. Collaborating with Government agencies
responsible for human rights, environmental protection, and Indigenous
affairs ensures that conservation projects align with national policies and
legal frameworks. Such partnerships facilitate a coordinated and cohesive
approach that adheres to regulatory requirements and national priorities,
64

strengthening the overall impact of conservation efforts. In addition to

these partnerships, involving civil society organizations is vital for creating
a broader societal awareness and understanding of the importance of
human rights in conservation. These organizations serve as intermediaries
between communities and conservation projects, helping to bridge gaps
and address concerns that may arise during the implementation phase.
Furthermore, the private sector can play a significant role in supporting
human rights-based conservation. Partnering with businesses that adhere to
ethical and sustainable practices fosters responsible environmental
stewardship and contributes to the overall success and longevity of
conservation initiatives. Lastly, donor organizations play a pivotal role by
providing funding and guidance that prioritize human rights principles,
thereby promoting the integration of human rights into conservation
practices. This collaborative network, comprising human rights
organizations, academic institutions, local NGOs, government agencies,
and donor organizations, creates a holistic and synergistic approach to
conservation that respects that respects the rights and dignity of all
involved parties and fosters sustainable outcomes.
7.3 Capacity Building and Collaboration

Fostering effective collaboration and communication (figure 10) is
pivotal for conservation organizations aiming to uphold human rights
principles. Initiating regular consultations and dialogues with human rights
organizations, local communities, and Indigenous Peoples (figure 11) serves
as a foundation for staying well-informed about evolving human rights
concerns and perspectives. This continuous engagement establishes an
open channel for mutual understanding and responsiveness.
Furthermore, developing internal policies and guidelines (figure 12)
within the organization and forging partnerships with human rights
organizations prove instrumental, offering a symbiotic relationship that
brings valuable expertise, advocacy support, and additional resources. By
uniting efforts through strategic partnerships, conservation organizations
can more effectively integrate human rights considerations into their
initiatives, ensuring a harmonious alignment between conservation goals
and the protection of human rights. In this integrated approach (figure 13),
regular consultations and partnerships synergistically contribute to a
comprehensive and ethical framework for conservation practices.
By investing in the skills and knowledge of staff and forging
partnerships with relevant stakeholders, conservation organizations can
better protect both natural ecosystems and the rights of the people who
depend on them.
65

Cultural Competency Legal Knowledge Conflict Resolution Community Engagement Communication Skills
Conservation staff needs Staff and communities Training in conflict Building skills in Effective
training to understand should be familiar with resolution and community communication,
the cultural contexts of international and negotiation skills can engagement, including cross-cultural
the communities they national laws related to help staff navigate participatory communication, is
work with, including human rights, disputes and conflicts approaches, and critical for explaining
Indigenous Peoples. indigenous rights, and that may arise during stakeholder conservation objectives,
This helps build trust environmental conservation initiatives. collaboration is essential benefits, and potential
and effective protection to ensure for involving local impacts to stakeholders
communication. compliance and respect communities and
for rights. respecting their rights.
Figure 10: Capacity building needs and approaches for conservation staff
Figure 11: Some guidelines and tools for Human Rights implementation in
Conservation
66

Figure 12: Capacity-building needs for Human Rights Directors in the

conservation sector
Workshops and Seminars

Organizing workshops and
Online Courses and Modules
seminars that focus on human Resource Centers
rights in conservation can Developing online courses or
provide practical training for modules that conservation
staff. These sessions can cover staff can access at their Creating resource centers with
topics like FPIC, community- convenience can be an materials, guidelines, and best
based conservation, and effective way to provide practices related to human
conflict resolution. training on human rights and rights in conservation can
conservation. serve as a valuable reference
for staff.
Figure 13: Training programs and resources for integrating human rights
into conservation practices
8. MONITORING, EVALUATION, AND REPORTING
8.1 Frameworks for Monitoring and Evaluating Human Rights in

Conservation
Adopting monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEAL) frameworks is
pivotal for the effective integration of human rights principles into
conservation projects. The Human Rights-Based Approach (HRBA) offers a
systematic methodology that extends beyond mere monitoring and
evaluation, emphasizing key principles such as participation, non-
discrimination, accountability, and transparency. In parallel, there is the
UNDP‘s Human Rights-Based Approach to Development Programming.
Initially designed for development initiatives, it proves adaptable and
relevant to conservation efforts. It guides the integration of human rights into
development initiatives and underscores the importance of assessing the
impact on human rights, ensuring meaningful participation, and addressing
vulnerabilities within the context of development initiatives. By intertwining
these principles, the integration of human rights into both development and
conservation becomes a holistic and impactful endeavour.
Table 6: MEAL and Human Rights in Conservation

Indicators and Metrics for Assessing Indicators and Methodologies for
Human Rights Impacts Monitoring and Evaluating Human
Rights in Conservation Projects
Participation Metrics: These Free, Prior, and Informed Consent
indicators assess the extent of (FPIC) Compliance: Monitoring
involvement and influence of local whether FPIC processes are followed
communities and stakeholders in and whether communities grant
conservation decision-making consent for conservation activities.
67

processes.
Non-Discrimination Metrics: Benefit-Sharing Mechanisms:
Indicators related to non- Evaluating whether revenue-sharing
discrimination evaluate whether mechanisms are effectively
conservation projects have adverse implemented and benefit local
impacts on marginalized groups or communities as intended.
exacerbate existing inequalities.
Access to Resources Metrics: Social Impact Assessments:
Assessing changes in local Conducting assessments to measure
communities' access to and control the social impacts of conservation
over natural resources can indicate initiatives on local communities and
the impact on their livelihoods and Indigenous Peoples.
rights.
Conflict Resolution Metrics: Human Rights Impact Assessments
Metrics related to the resolution of (HRIAs): Implementing HRIAs to
conflicts and grievances can identify and mitigate potential
measure the effectiveness of human rights risks associated with
dispute resolution mechanisms in conservation projects.
protecting human rights.
Table 7: Reporting Human Rights in Conservation

Reporting Mechanisms and Reporting Mechanisms and
Frameworks to Document Progress Transparency in Human Rights
and Challenges Implementation
Regular Progress Reports: Community Feedback Mechanisms:
Conservation organizations can Establishing channels for local
issue regular reports that communities and stakeholders to
document progress, challenges, provide feedback on conservation
and achievements related to projects and their human rights
human rights integration in their impact.
projects.
Annual Sustainability Reports: Public Disclosure: Providing access
These reports can include sections to project documents, impact
dedicated to human rights, assessments, and reports to ensure
detailing how conservation transparency and accountability.
initiatives align with human rights
principles.
Project-Specific Reporting: For Third-Party Audits: Engaging
individual conservation projects, independent third-party
organizations can create specific organizations to conduct audits and
reporting mechanisms that outline assessments of human rights
human rights goals, actions taken, integration in conservation efforts.
and outcomes.
68

Government Agencies Academic Institutions

•Partnering with •Collaborating with
government agencies academic institutions can
responsible for human facilitate research, data
rights, Indigenous affairs, collection, and analysis on
and environmental the human rights
protection can align dimensions of
conservation efforts with conservation projects.
national policies and legal
frameworks.
Development
Organizations
•Collaborating with
organizations focused on
sustainable development
can help integrate
conservation and human
rights into broader
development initiatives.
Indigenous and Community-Based Organizations

•Partnering with local Indigenous and community-based
organizations can ensure that conservation projects are locally
led and respect the rights and knowledge of these groups.
Figure 14: Opportunities for cross-sectoral partnerships to promote Human

Rights in conservation efforts
Figure 15: Enhancing accountability and transparency in Human Rights-

Based Conservation approaches
Finally, annex ii of the document titled - Rights-based approaches to

conservation - provide more examples of HRIA and RBA models and tools
(Campese, 2009).57 Effective monitoring, evaluation, and reporting
mechanisms are essential for ensuring that human rights are upheld in
57
Campese, J., “Rights-based approaches: Exploring issues and opportunities for conservation”
(2009). Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR and IUCN.
69

conservation projects. They help organizations identify areas for

improvement, address challenges, and demonstrate transparency and
accountability to stakeholders and the public.
9. GAPS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
9.1 Emerging Issues and Trends in the Intersection of Human Rights and
Conservation
In the evolving landscape of conservation, several interconnected
trends are reshaping the discourse. First and foremost, the concept of
climate justice is gaining prominence as the impacts of climate change
disproportionately affect vulnerable communities.58 This intertwining of
climate justice with conservation efforts reflects a growing recognition of
the need to address environmental issues in a socially equitable manner.
Secondly, there is a notable shift in perspective with the emerging trend of
recognizing the rights of nature, exemplified by the consideration of legal
personhood for ecosystems.59 This trend prompts a re-evaluation of how
conservation initiatives should be approached, challenging traditional
paradigms, and encouraging a more holistic perspective that includes the
intrinsic rights of the environment.60 Additionally, the integration of
technology in conservation, such as remote monitoring and data collection,
brings to the forefront the importance of digital rights.61 As conservation
efforts become more technologically advanced, concerns related to data
privacy and the rights of communities involved in these initiatives become
increasingly significant.
In essence, these three trends—climate justice, rights of nature, and
digital rights—converge to shape a dynamic and multifaceted landscape
that demands a nuanced and comprehensive approach to contemporary
conservation challenges.
9.2 Ethical Considerations and Dilemmas in Human Rights-Based

Conservation Approaches
In navigating the complex landscape of conservation, organizations
frequently encounter challenges that demand a delicate equilibrium
between various considerations. Balancing the rights and needs of local
communities with the overarching goal of conserving biodiversity presents
a recurring dilemma for these organizations. This intricate balance is
further complicated by the ethical challenge of ensuring cultural sensitivity.
Respecting the cultural values and practices of Indigenous Peoples and
58
UNEP, “Towards a Pollution-Free Planet: Background Report” (2018).United Nations
Environment Programme, Nairobi. <https://www.unep.org/resources/report/towards-pollution-
free-planet-background-report>, accessed on 15 November 2023.
59
Stone, C., “Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects” (1972) 45(2).
Southern California Law Review 450-501.
60
Cullinan, C., “Wild law: A manifesto for Earth justice” (2015). Chelsea Green Publishing, London.
61
IUCN, “Guidelines for applying the IUCN Global Standard for NbS” (2018). Retrieved from
<https://www.iucn.org/theme/nature-based-solutions/publications>, accessed on 15 November 2023.
70

local communities while implementing conservation initiatives requires a

nuanced approach, acknowledging the diversity of perspectives at play.
Moreover, ethical dilemmas surface in the realm of benefit
distribution, where decisions on how the rewards of conservation, such as
revenue from ecotourism, are allocated among different stakeholder groups
become critical. Striking a fair and inclusive balance in benefit-sharing
mechanisms is essential to avoid exacerbating existing social inequalities.
Furthermore, fostering genuine community engagement becomes pivotal,
as local stakeholders must be active participants in decision-making
processes, ensuring their voices are heard and considered in the
formulation and implementation of conservation strategies.
Amidst these challenges, organizations must navigate a path that not
only protects biodiversity but also upholds the principles of justice, equity,
and respect for human rights. Achieving this delicate equilibrium demands
continuous collaboration, transparency, and a commitment to
understanding and addressing the multifaceted challenges that arise at the
intersection of conservation and human rights.
9.3 Recommendations for Future Research, Policy Development, and

Practice Improvement
Creating a comprehensive strategy for the seamless integration of
human rights into conservation initiatives involves a multifaceted
approach. First, conducting research to meticulously assess the long-term
impact of human rights-based conservation initiatives serves as the
foundational step. This research would aim to comprehensively evaluate
the effects on both conservation outcomes and the well-being of local
communities. Parallel to this, advocating for the development and
implementation of legal frameworks is crucial, with a specific focus on
explicitly addressing the rights of Indigenous Peoples and local
communities in the context of conservation. Building robust partnerships
further strengthens this approach, fostering collaboration among
conservation organizations, human rights entities, and academic
institutions to develop and implement best practices. Simultaneously,
investment in capacity building and training programs for both
conservation staff and local communities becomes paramount, ensuring the
effective integration of human rights principles. To navigate the ethical
complexities that may arise, developing ethical guidelines is imperative,
emphasizing principles of fairness, respect, and justice. Additionally,
sustaining advocacy efforts to raise awareness about the intersection of
human rights and conservation, while continually advocating for policies
prioritizing human rights in conservation practices, completes this
comprehensive strategy. In concert, these interconnected steps form a
holistic framework that aligns research, legal advocacy, partnerships,
capacity building, ethical considerations, and ongoing advocacy to promote
the harmonious integration of human rights within conservation initiatives.
71

Limited Local Participation: In

many cases, local communities
and Indigenous Peoples are not
adequately involved in
decision-making processes,
leading to conflicts and human
rights violations.
Ethical Dilemmas: In-depth
analysis of ethical dilemmas in Lack of Capacity: Conservation
conservation projects, such as organizations often lack the
trade-offs between capacity to integrate human
conservation goals and human rights effectively into their
rights, to develop practical projects, leading to gaps in
ethical guidelines and decision- implementation.
making frameworks.
Climate Justice: Further

exploration of the intersection Gaps and Inadequate Monitoring and
Evaluation: There is a need for
between climate change, Challenges in standardized and practical
climate justice, and
conservation, with a focus on Integrating tools for monitoring and
evaluating the human rights
how conservation can be Human Rights impacts of conservation
aligned with climate justice
principles and policies. in Conservation projects.
Long-Term Impact
Assessment: Research should
Benefit Distribution:
focus on assessing the long-
Investigating equitable benefit
term impact of conservation
distribution mechanisms to
projects on the human rights
ensure that the benefits of
and well-being of local
conservation, such as revenue
communities and Indigenous
from ecotourism or resource
Peoples. This involves tracking
use, reach all stakeholders,
changes in livelihoods,
especially marginalized groups. Effectiveness of Grievance resource access, and cultural
Mechanisms: Evaluating the preservation over time.
effectiveness of grievance
mechanisms and conflict
resolution processes in
addressing human rights
violations and disputes in
conservation contexts.
Figure 16: Gaps and future directions within Human-Rights based

Conservation
10. CONCLUSION
10.1 Summary of Key Findings from the Literature Review

Navigating the complex terrain of integrating human rights into
conservation efforts involves addressing a spectrum of challenges outlined
in the literature. Among these hurdles are limited local participation,
organizational capacity constraints, and the imperative for effective
monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. Despite these challenges, the
72

evolving landscape reveals promising emerging trends that reshape the

discourse. Noteworthy among these is the convergence of climate justice
with conservation, an increasing acknowledgment of the rights of nature,
and the growing recognition of the role of digital rights in shaping
conservation strategies. Amidst these shifts, the pivotal role of stakeholders
becomes evident, underscoring the critical need to engage with local
communities, Indigenous Peoples, and various stakeholders. This
engagement is not only pivotal for the success of conservation initiatives
but also fundamental for the protection of human rights within these
contexts. Yet, within this intricate web of considerations, ethical dilemmas
surface, creating a delicate balance between conservation objectives and the
rights and needs of communities. Nowhere is this more apparent than in
the nuanced negotiations surrounding benefit distribution and the
imperative for cultural sensitivity, where ethical decisions become crucial in
charting a course that respects both conservation goals and the diverse
rights of communities involved.
10.2 Implications for the Role of Human Rights Director in Conservation

In defining the responsibilities of a Human Rights Director within the
realm of conservation, it becomes evident that a multifaceted approach is
essential. Acknowledging the challenges and complexities outlined in the
literature, the role should extend beyond mere oversight to actively
integrate human rights into the fabric of conservation policies, practices,
and decision-making processes. Capacity building emerges as a pivotal
aspect of this role, as Human Rights Directors should not only recognize
but also address capacity gaps within conservation organizations.
Equipped with the necessary skills, these directors should play a crucial
role in facilitating training programs and awareness initiatives, fostering an
environment conducive to effective human rights integration. Moreover, at
the heart of this responsibility lies the imperative for meaningful
community engagement. The Human Rights Director should champion
initiatives that ensure local communities' rights are not just acknowledged
but actively respected, thereby promoting a harmonious relationship
between conservation goals and the well-being of the communities
involved. In essence, the role of a Human Rights Director encompasses a
holistic and proactive approach, ranging from policy integration to capacity
building and community engagement, all crucial elements for the successful
integration of human rights into conservation practices.
10.3 Importance of the Human Rights Director Role in Advancing

Conservation and Human Rights Agendas
Establishing a seamless alignment of objectives stands as a
fundamental responsibility for the Human Rights Director, a role that
bridges the realms of conservation and human rights. This pivotal function
ensures that conservation initiatives extend beyond the preservation of
biodiversity to actively incorporate the protection of the rights and well-
being of communities affected by these efforts. In tandem with this
73

objective alignment, the role enhances accountability within conservation

organizations. By promoting transparency and adherence to international
human rights standards, the Human Rights Director becomes a catalyst for
fostering an environment of responsibility and ethical conduct. Beyond the
proactive stance of aligning objectives and enforcing accountability, the
director also serves a crucial role in conflict resolution. Armed with the
capacity to facilitate mechanisms for resolving disputes and addressing
grievances, the Human Rights Director plays a central role in ensuring that
conflicts arising in the context of conservation are dealt with in a fair and
just manner. In essence, the Human Rights Director operates as a linchpin,
weaving together the goals of conservation and human rights, while
simultaneously promoting accountability and providing a mechanism for
resolving conflicts within the complex landscape of conservation efforts.
10.4 Synopsis of the Paper in 19 Key Points

Expanding the role of the human rights director in conservation
organizations involves recognizing the interconnectedness of human rights
and environmental conservation. Throughout the paper, several
suggestions have been made to enhance and broaden the responsibilities of
the human rights director. By implementing these suggestions, summarised
in the following into 19 points, conservation organizations can elevate the
role of the human rights director, fostering a more holistic and socially
responsible approach to conservation that respects human rights and
promotes sustainable practices.
1. Integrate Human Rights into Conservation Policies: Collaborate with
organizational leadership to ensure that human rights
considerations are integrated into the core policies and practices of
the conservation organization.
2. Develop Cross-Disciplinary Training Programs: Design and implement
training programs that bridge the gap between human rights and
conservation, equipping staff and communities with a
comprehensive understanding of both fields. Facilitate
interdisciplinary collaboration between the human rights director
and experts in environmental science, law, technology, psychology,
entrepreneurship, biology, ecology, anthropology, marketing, and
other relevant fields to promote a holistic approach to conservation
that integrates human rights considerations.
3. Public Awareness Campaigns: Develop and lead public awareness
campaigns on the interconnectedness of human rights and
conservation, fostering a broader understanding and support for
ethical conservation practices
4. Facilitate Community Engagement Initiatives: Empower the human
rights director to lead community engagement programs, ensuring
that local communities are actively involved in conservation efforts
and that their rights are respected.
5. Advocate for Social Inclusion and Equity: Promote inclusive decision-
making processes within the organization, ensuring that diverse
74

voices, including those from affected communities, are considered

in conservation strategies. Advocate for social inclusion and equity
within conservation projects, considering the impact on
marginalized groups and working to address any disparities.
Integrate a gender-responsive approach into conservation practices,
with the human rights director leading efforts to address gender
disparities and promote equality in conservation projects.
6. Monitor, Evaluate and Report on Human Rights Impact: As the human
rights director playing a key role in assessing and improving the
organization's performance, establish mechanisms to monitor and
report on the human rights impact of conservation initiatives,
providing transparency and accountability.
7. Collaborate with Indigenous Communities: Foster partnerships with
Indigenous communities, recognizing their unique relationship with
the environment and unique perspectives on conservation and
respecting their rights to land and resources. Advancing Indigenous
rights by involving them as key stakeholders in conservation efforts.
8. Address Human-Wildlife Conflict Responsibly: Develop strategies to
address human-wildlife conflict that prioritize both human safety
and the well-being of wildlife, respecting the rights of affected
communities.
9. Crisis Response Planning: Empowered with the mandate to lead
effort, develop crisis response plans to address emergencies in a
way that respects human rights. Enhance the human rights
director's role to include conflict resolution skills, addressing
disputes that may arise between conservation efforts and local
communities, respecting diverse perspectives.
10. Implement Ethical Supply Chain Practices: Work towards ethical
supply chain practices, ensuring that conservation efforts do not
contribute to human rights abuses in the sourcing of materials or
resources.
11. Promote Environmental Justice: Conservation is often tagged as a field
for the privileged. Championing environmental justice initiatives
would emphasize the right of all individuals, regardless of socio-
economic status, to benefit from and participate in conservation
initiatives and respect the rights of Indigenous peoples by ensuring
that conservation practices do not disproportionately impact
marginalized communities.
12. Engage in Policy Advocacy: Actively advocate for policies at local,
national, and international levels that impact both human rights and
conservation efforts and promote the integration of human rights
principles into conservation practices.
13. Empower Local Leadership: Support and empower local leadership
within conservation projects, recognizing the importance of local
knowledge and involving community members in decision-making
processes.
75

14. Contribute to Sustainable Development Goals: Align conservation

efforts with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals,
particularly those related to poverty alleviation, equality, and
climate action.
15. Educate Stakeholders on the Interconnectedness: Develop educational
materials and campaigns to raise awareness among stakeholders
about the interconnectedness of human rights and conservation,
fostering a culture of responsibility.
16. Ethical Fundraising: Collaborate with the fundraising team to ensure
that funding sources align with human rights principles, avoiding
support from entities with questionable human rights records.
17. Establish Grievance Mechanisms: Implement effective grievance
mechanisms for communities affected by conservation activities,
ensuring a responsive and fair process for addressing concerns.
18. Rethink Legal Compliance: Naturally, the human rights director is
tasked with ensuring legal compliance in conservation projects,
including adherence to international human rights standards and
environmental regulations. However, reconsidering legal
compliance is crucial, as it is important to acknowledge that
international norms may carry inherent biases that may not always
align with the diverse and nuanced realities on the ground in
specific contexts. While international standards provide a broad
framework for guiding ethical behavior, they may not
comprehensively address the unique social, cultural, and
environmental factors influencing specific societies. In this light,
legal compliance should involve a nuanced understanding of local
contexts, recognizing the potential limitations and biases present in
international norms. This approach encourages a more inclusive and
adaptable interpretation of compliance, ensuring that conservation
initiatives respect the diverse perspectives and needs of the
communities directly affected by them.
19. Collaborate with Human Rights Organizations: Collaborate with human
rights organizations to leverage expertise, resources, and networks
in addressing shared concerns at the intersection of human rights
and conservation and ensure that conservation initiatives align with
human rights standards that are adapted to the context within
which action is envisioned.
10.5 Call for Continued Efforts to Prioritize and Integrate Human Rights
in Conservation Practices
Delving into the literature review reveals a clear imperative for the
advancement of research and evidence to navigate the complexities of
human rights-based conservation initiatives. To this end, there is a pressing
need for further studies that not only assess the immediate but also the
long-term impact of such initiatives, fostering the development of evidence-
based practices. Simultaneously, the advocacy landscape should persist in
its efforts to champion legal frameworks explicitly recognizing the rights of
76

Indigenous Peoples and local communities within the conservation domain.

As these frameworks evolve, a parallel commitment to continued
investment in capacity building and training programs emerges as an
essential component. This investment is deemed crucial for the successful
integration of human rights principles into conservation practices, requiring
a collaborative effort that extends to both conservation staff and local
communities. Moreover, as the landscape of conservation projects
invariably presents ethical challenges and dilemmas, the development of
comprehensive ethical guidelines becomes paramount. Such guidelines
serve as a compass, navigating the intricate terrain of conservation with an
emphasis on fairness, respect, and justice. In this interconnected
framework, research, legal frameworks, capacity building, and ethical
guidelines harmoniously converge, collectively shaping a pathway toward
more ethically grounded and effective human rights integration in
conservation practices.
REFERENCES
Adams, W., & Hutton, J., ―People, parks and poverty: political ecology and
biodiversity conservation‖ (2007) 5 (2) Conservation and Society 147-183.
Retrieved from
<https://journals.lww.com/coas/Fulltext/2007/05020/People,_Parks_and
_Poverty__Political_Ecology_and.1.aspx>, accessed on 23 November 2023
African Parks, ―Travel Africa and Visit the Parks” (n.d.). Retrieved from
<https://www.africanparks.org/visit-parks>, accessed on 23
November 2023
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C., ―Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of
community in natural resource conservation‖ (1999) 27 (4) World
Development 629-649. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-
750X(98)00161-2>
AWF, ―Where We Work” (n.d.). Retrieved from African Wildlife Foundation
<https://www.awf.org/where-we-work>, accessed on 23 November
2023
Berkes, F., ―Rethinking community-based conservation‖ (2004) 18 (3),
Conservation Biology 621-630. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-
1739.2004.00077.x.>
Büscher, B., Dressler, W., & Fletcher, R., ―Environmental conservation in the
neoliberal age‖ (2014), University of Arizona Press
Cambridge Conservation, ―INTRINSIC: Integrating rights and social issues in
conservation” (n.d.). Retrieved from Cambridge Conservation:
<https://www.cambridgeconservation.org/project/intrinsic-
integrating-rights-and-social-issues-in-conservation/>, accessed on 23
November 2023
Campese, J., ―Rights-based approaches: Exploring issues and opportunities
for conservation‖ (2009). Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR and IUCN.
CAPE, ―People Making Biodiversity Work‖ (2006). Cape Action for People
and the Environment (SANBI Biodiversity Series 4),
77

<https://www.cepf.net/sites/default/files/fynbos_fynmense.pdf>,
accessed on 23 November 2023
Carl C. Trettin, Zhaohua Dai, Wenwu Tang, David Lagomasino, Nathan
Thomas, Seung K. Lee, Marc Simard, Médard O. Ebanega, Atticus
Stoval, & Temilola E. Fatoyinbo, ―Mangrove carbon stocks in Pongara
National Park, Gabon‖ (2021) 259 Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
107432
Chisleanschi, R., ―Gran Chaco: South America’s second-largest forest at risk of
collapsing‖, (2019, September 17). Retrieved from Mongabay:
<https://news.mongabay.com/2019/09/gran-chaco-south-americas-
second-largest-forest-at-risk-of-collapsing/>, accessed on 23
November 2023
Chyulu Hills REDD+, ―Annual Report” (2022).
<http://maasaiwilderness.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/2022-
CHRP-Annual-Report_KEN-FINAL.pdf>, accessed on 23 November
2023
CI, ―Respecting Human Rights” (n.d.). Retrieved from Conservation
International: <https://www.conservation.org/priorities/human-
rights>, accessed on 23 November 2023
CI, ―Senior Staff” (2023). Retrieved from Conservation International:
<https://www.conservation.org/about/senior-staff>, accessed on 23
November 2023
CIHR, ―The Conservation Initiative on Human Rights (CIHR)” (2016).
Retrieved from <https://www.thecihr.org/>, accessed on 23
November 2023
Colchester, M., ―Conservation policy and Indigenous peoples‖ (2004) 7 (3)
Environmental Science & Policy 145-153.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.02.004>
Colchester, M., ―Salvaging Nature: Indigenous Peoples, Protected Areas, and
Biodiversity Conservation‖ (2003), Forest Peoples Programme and
World Rainforest Movement
Cullinan, C., ―Wild law: A manifesto for Earth justice‖ (2015). Chelsea Green
Publishing, London
De Villiers, B., ―Land Claims & National Parks” (1999). The Human Sciences
Research Council (HSRC). Retrieved from
<https://www.hsrcpress.ac.za/books/land-claims-national-parks>,
Demeke, A., ―The Omo-Kuraz Sugar Development Project” (n.d.). Retrieved
from Aiga Forum <https://www.aigaforum.com/articles/The-Omo-
Kraz-Sugar-development-Project-English.pdf>, accessed on 23
November 2023
Dowie, M., ―Conservation refugees: the hundred-year conflict between global
conservation and native peoples‖ (2011), MIT press
FAO/GEF, ―Sustainable Forest Lands Management and Conservation under an
Ecosocial Approach” (2021). Retrieved from
https://docplayer.net/222301167-Fao-gef-project-implementation-
78

report-2021-revised-template-1-basic-project-
data.html#google_vignette>, accessed on 23 November 2023
Fauna & Flora, ―Livelihoods Governance” (n.d.). Retrieved from Fauna &
Flora: <https://www.fauna-flora.org/expertise/livelihoods-
governance/>, accessed on 23 November 2023
FPP, ―Indigenous Peoples and the World Bank: Experiences with Participation‖
2011. Retrieved from Forest Peoples Programme
<https://www.forestpeoples.org/sites/fpp/files/publication/2011/
08/wbipsandparticipjul05eng.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023
FSC, ―FSC Guidelines for the Implementation of the Right to Free, Prior and
Informed Consent (FPIC)‖ (2021). Forest Stewardship Council
<https://fsc.org/en/document-
centre/documents/retrieve/e3adfb1d-f2ed-4e36-a171-6864c96f0d76>,
GEF, ―The Nature and Role of Local Benefits in GEF programme Areas: Case
Study Tanzania – Zanzibar” (2014),
<https://www.gefieo.org/sites/default/files/documents/lb-case-
study-tanzania-zanzibar.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023
Government of Kenya, ―Rehabilitation of the Mau Forest Ecosystem” (2009),
<https://www.kws.go.ke/file/1446/download?token=xDBvXH_o>,
Helge Denker, Namibian Association of Community-Based Natural
Resource Management Support Organisations, ―Living with Wildlife:
The Story of Namibia’s Communal Conservancies” (2011) NACSO,
Windhoek, Namibia, <https://search.worldcat.org/title/756058205>
Igoe, J., ―Human rights, conservation, and the privatization of sovereignty
in Africa–a discussion of recent changes in Tanzania‖ (2007) 15 (276)
Policy matters 532-34
IIED, ―Markets for Watershed Services-Country Profile” (2006-2008).
<https://watershedmarkets.org/documents/Ecuador_Pimampiro_E.
pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023
ILO, ―Convention No. 169 concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in
Independent Countries‖ (1989). Retrieved from International Labour
Organization <https://tinyurl.com/4jp5hrjp>, accessed on 23
November 2023
IUCN, ―Guidelines for applying the IUCN Global Standard for NbS” (2018),
Retrieved from <https://www.iucn.org/theme/nature-based-
solutions/publications>, accessed on 15 November 2023
IUCN, ―IUCN Expert Commissions” (n.d.). Retrieved from
<https://www.iucn.org/our-union/expert-commissions>, accessed
on 23 November 2023
IUCN, ―World Conservation Congress Resolutions‖, (2020). Retrieved from
<https://www.iucn.org/congress/resolutions>, accessed on 23
November 2023
IWGIA, ―Indigenous peoples in Cameroon‖, (2020, June 26). Retrieved from
The International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs
<https://www.iwgia.org/en/cameroon/3791-violence,-corruption,-
79

and-false-promises-conservation-and-the-baka-in-
cameroon.html#:~:text=Forced%20from%20their%20forests%20by,lab
our%20by%20new%20sedentary%20neighbours.>, accessed on 23
November 2023
JICA-MoEF, ―Joint Forest Management: A Handbook” (2012). India's Ministry
of Environment and Forests,
<https://ifs.nic.in/Dynamic/pdf/JFM%20handbook.pdf>, accessed
on 23 November 2023
Joram K. Kagombe, Joshua K. Cheboiwo, Alfred Gichu, Collins Handa, & Jane
Wamboi, ―Payment for environmental services: status and opportunities in
Kenya‖ (2018) 40. Journal of Resources Development and Management Journal,
<https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JRDM/article/view/40771>
JPS Associates, ―Joint Forest Management (JFM)” (2015) JPS Associates (P) Ltd.
<https://www.mpforest.gov.in/img/files/HRD_HandBook_E.pdf>,
Kamski, B., ―The Kuraz Sugar Development Project (OTuRN Briefing Note 1)”
(2016). Lansing, Michigan: Omo-Turkana Research Network
<https://www.canr.msu.edu/oturn/OTuRN_Briefing_Note_1.pdf>,
King, L., ―Inter-Organisational Dynamics in Natural Resource Management”
(n.d.). Retrieved from USAID
<https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnabx926.pdf>, accessed on 23
November 2023
Kweli, N., ―Denial of Legal Recognition for Baka in Cameroon‖, (2021,
November 18). Retrieved from StoryMaps:
<https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/e318bb915b404aa38a651d22e
d990ab7>, accessed on 23 November 2023
Lendelvo, S., Suich, H., & Mfune, J. K., ―Stakeholders' Perceptions of the
Outcomes of Translocated Eland in Nyae Nyae Conservancy‖ (2022) 3
Frontiers in Conservation Science 783951
Lozano, R. M., ―Forests with History: Exploring the Social Effects of the Creation
of the Cordillera Azul National Park on the Chzutino People of Amazonian
Peru” (2013). Retrieved from PhD Dissertation - University of Florida
<https://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/E0/04/52/08/00001/MEND
OZA_LOZANO_R.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023
Mara Naboisho: EduAfrica (n.d.), ―Mara Naboisho Conservancy Case Study:
Nature vs People”. Retrieved from <https://edu-africa.com/students-
abroad/mara-naboisho-conservancy-case-study/>, accessed on 23
November 2023
McDermott, M., Mahanty, S., & Schreckenberg, K., ―Examining equity: a
multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for
ecosystem services‖ (2013) 33, Environmental Science & Policy 416-
427. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006>
Michael B. Mascia, J. Peter Brosius, Tracy A. Dobson, Bruce C. Forbes, Leah
Horowitz, Margaret A. McKean, & Nancy J. Turner, ―Conservation
and the social sciences‖ (2003) 17 (3) Conservation Biology 649-650.
<https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01738.x>
80

Moutoni, L., ―Community Forestry in Cameroon – an overview of the community

perspective” (2019). Forest Peoples Programme, London
NACSO, ―State of Conservation in Namibia Reports” (n.d.).
<https://www.nacso.org.na/resources/state-of-community-
conservation>, accessed on 23 November 2023
Nepal: NTNC, ―Sustainable Tourism Enhancement In Nepal's Protected Areas”
(2020). World Bank/National Trust for Nature Conservancy.
<https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/ar/8682615578948357
73/pdf/Environmental-and-Social-Management-Framework.pdf>,
NPY Women's Council, ―NPY Women’s Council is led by women’s law,
authority and culture to deliver health, social and cultural services for all
Anangu” (n.d.). Retrieved from Ngaanyatjarra Pitjantjatjara
Yankunytjatjara Women‘s Council Aboriginal Corporation
<https://www.npywc.org.au/>, accessed on 15 November 2023.
NTNC, ―Annapurna Conservation Area Project (ACAP)” (n.d.). Retrieved from
<https://ntnc.org.np/project/annapurna-conservation-area-project-
acap>, accessed on 23 November 2023
Paige, W., Igoe, J., & Brockington, D., ―Parks, and peoples: the social impact
of protected areas‖ (2006) 35, Annual Review of Anthropology 251-
277. <https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308>
Papua New Guinea Conservation and Environment Protection Authority,
―National Biodiversity Strategic Action Plan: 2019-2024” (2019).
Retrieved from <https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/pg/pg-nbsap-v2-
en.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023
Pertet, F. ―Kenya's Experience in Establishing Coastal and Marine Protected Areas”
(n.d.). USAID <https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnaat749.pdf>,
USAID, ―COMFISH Project” (2014),
<https://www.crc.uri.edu/download/COMFISH-FY2014WP-
FINALEnglish_508.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023
Reed, M., ―Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A
literature review‖ (2008) 141(10) Biological Conservation 2417-2431.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014>
RFUS, ―2022 Annual Report” (2022). Retrieved from Rainforest Foundation
US, <https://rainforestfoundation.org/about/financials-
transparency/2022-annual-report/>, accessed on 23 November 2023
Scalise, E., ―Indigenous Women's Land Rights: Case Studies from Africa‖
(2012). In State of the World’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples.
<https://minorityrights.org/wp-content/uploads/old-site-
downloads/download-1117-Indigenous-womens-land-rights-case-
studies-from-Africa.pdf>, accessed on 15 November 2023.
Schultz, T. ―Tubbataha Reefs Primer: 7th Edition” (2017). Retrieved from
<https://tubbatahareefs.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/TRNP-
7th-Edition-Primer.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023
Stone, C., ―Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural
Objects‖ (1972) 45 (2) Southern California Law Review 450-501.
81

Survival International, ―Indian authorities harass tribal leaders‖ (2017, May

10). Retrieved from
<https://www.survivalinternational.org/news/11682>, accessed on
23 November 2023
Swenger/Embobut Forest: Amnesty International, ―Families Torn: Apart
Forced Eviction of Indigenous People in Embotut Forest, Kenya” (2021).
Retrieved from <https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-
content/uploads/2021/05/AFR3283402018ENGLISH.pdf>, accessed
on 23 November 2023
The Field Museum, ―Parque Nacional Cordillera Azul” (n.d.). Retrieved from
<https://fieldguides.fieldmuseum.org/sites/default/files/rapid-
color-guides-pdfs/117_Azul-Landscapes_0.pdf>, accessed on 23
November 2023
TNC, ―Human Rights Guide for Working with Indigenous Peoples and Local
Communities” (n.d.). Retrieved from
<https://www.tnchumanrightsguide.org/>, accessed on 23
November 2023
UN, ―United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples‖ (2007).
Retrieved from United Nations:
<https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-
content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf>
UN, ―Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (1948). Retrieved from
<https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/>,
UNEP, ―Mangroves of Western and Central Africa” (2007). UNEP-Regional
Seas Programme/UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK
UNEP, ―Torra Conservancy” (2012). Equator Initiative Case Study Series.
New York, NY <https://www.equatorinitiative.org/wp-
content/uploads/2017/05/case_1348261012.pdf>, accessed on 23
November 2023
UNEP, ―Towards a Pollution-Free Planet: Background Report‖ (2018).United
Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.
<https://www.unep.org/resources/report/towards-pollution-free-
planet-background-report>, accessed on 15 November 2023
UNEP/GEF, ―Communities Conserving Wildlife” (2021),
<https://www.thegef.org/sites/default/files/publications/GEF_SG
P_Communities_Conserving_Wildlife_2021.pdf>, accessed on 23
November 2023
UNESCO, ―World Heritage and Sustainable Development: The Role of Local
Communities‖ (2012). Retrieved from
<https://whc.unesco.org/en/events/907/>, accessed on 23
November 2023
USAID, ―Community Based Natural Resource Management Stocktaking
Assessment Malawi Profile” (2010),
<https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00JRSD.pdf>, accessed on 23
November 2023
82

USAID, ―Senegal Biodiversity and Tropical Forests Assessments” (2008),

<https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnadl464.pdf>, accessed on 23
November 2023
UWA, ―Bwindi Impenetrable National Park” (2018). Retrieved from Uganda
Wildlife Authority: <https://ugandawildlife.org/wp-
content/uploads/2022/01/Bwindi-cc-2018-2.pdf>, accessed on 23
November 2023
UNDESA, ―State of the World's Indigenous Peoples - ST/ESA/328” (2009).
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
<https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/node/1046/pdf?year=2020
>, accessed on 23 November 2023
Vukenkeng A. Wujung, Cornelius M. Lambi, Dobdinga Fonchamnyo, Forbe
H. Ngangnchi & Ibrahim M. Muafueshiangha, ―Community Life
around Protected Areas in Cameroon: Conservation Story of Erat and
the Resettlement Communities around the Korup National Park‖
(2018) 6 (9) Universal Journal of Management 295-303
WCS, ―Sushil Raj Joins WCS as New Executive Director of Rights &
Communities Program” (2022, February 3). Retrieved from Wildlife
Conservation Society, <https://t.ly/wtxAn>, accessed on 23
November 2023
William M. Adams, Ros Aveling, Dan Brockington, Barney Dickson, Jo
Elliott, Jon Hutton, Dilys Roe, Bhaskar Vira, & William Wolmer,
―Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty‖ (2004) 306
(5699) Science 1146-1149. <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097920>
WRI, ―RELEASE: New LandMark Data Measure Impacts of Indigenous Peoples
and Local Communities on Forests and Climate” (2017, December 2020).
Retrieved from World Resources Institute
<https://www.wri.org/news/release-new-landmark-data-measure-
impacts-indigenous-peoples-and-local-communities-forests-and>,
WWF, ―Embedding Human Rights in Nature Conservation: From Intent to
Action” (2022). Retrieved from World Wildlife Fund
<https://www.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-
PDF/WWF/WWF-INT-Human-Rights-and-The-Environment-
Report-2022.pdf>, accessed on 23 November 2023
WWF, ―The State of Indigenous Peoples’ and Local Communities’ lands and
Territories” (2021), Gland, Switzerland: WWF, UNEP-WCMC,
SGP/ICCA-GSI, LM,
<https://wwflac.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/report_the_state_o
f_the_indigenous_peoples_and_local_communities_lands_and_territor
ies_1.pdf>, accessed on 15 November 2023.
WWF, ―WWF’s commitment to embed human rights in nature conservation:
Updates and voices from the WWF network” (2021, June 30). Retrieved
from World Wildlife Fund: <https://t.ly/krMxR>, accessed on 23
November 2023
83

AUTHORS’ DECLARATION AND ESSENTIAL ETHICAL COMPLIANCES
Authors’ Contributions (in accordance with ICMJE criteria for authorship)

Contribution Author 1 Author 2
Conceived and designed the research or analysis Yes Yes
Collected the data Yes No
Contributed to data analysis & interpretation Yes Yes
Wrote the article/paper Yes No
Critical revision of the article/paper Yes Yes
Editing of the article/paper Yes Yes
Supervision Yes No
Project Administration Yes No
Funding Acquisition No No
Overall Contribution Proportion (%) 70 30
Funding
No funding was available for the research conducted for and writing of this
paper. Therefore, acknowledging any support agency is not applicable in
case of this research or the written work. However, informal support of
institutional supervisors, colleagues and respondents is duly acknowledged.
Research involving human bodies or organs or tissues (Helsinki Declaration)

The author(s) solemnly declare(s) that this research has not involved any
human subject (body or organs) for experimentation. It was not a clinical
research. The contexts of human population/participation were only
indirectly covered through literature review. Therefore, an Ethical Clearance
(from a Committee or Authority) or ethical obligation of Helsinki Declaration
does not apply in cases of this study or written work.
Research involving animals (ARRIVE Checklist)

animal subject (body or organs) for experimentation. The research was not
based on laboratory experiment involving any kind animal. The contexts of
animals not even indirectly covered through literature review. Therefore, an
Ethical Clearance (from a Committee or Authority) or ethical obligation of
ARRIVE does not apply in cases of this study or written work.
Research on Indigenous Peoples and/or Traditional Knowledge

Indigenous Peoples as participants or respondents. The contexts of
Indigenous Peoples or Indigenous Knowledge are only indirectly covered,
through literature review. Therefore, an Ethical Clearance (from a
Committee or Authority) or prior informed consent (PIC) of the
respondents or Self-Declaration in this regard does not apply in cases of this
study or written work.
84

Research involving Plants

The author(s) solemnly declare(s) that this research has not involved the
plants for experiment or field studies. The contexts of plants are only
indirectly covered through literature review. Yet, during this research the
author(s) obeyed the principles of the Convention on Biological Diversity and
the Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
(Optional) Research Involving Local Community Participants (Non-Indigenous)

The author(s) solemnly declare(s) that this research has not directly
involved any local community participants or respondents belonging to
non-Indigenous peoples. Neither this study involved any child in any form
directly. The contexts of different humans, people, populations,
men/women/children and ethnic people are only indirectly covered
through literature review. Therefore, an Ethical Clearance (from a
Committee or Authority) or prior informed consent (PIC) of the
respondents or Self-Declaration in this regard does not apply in cases of this
study or written work.
(Optional) PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)
The author(s) has/have NOT complied with PRISMA standards. It is not
relevant in case of this study or written work.
Competing Interests/Conflict of Interest

Author(s) has/have no competing financial, professional, or personal
interests from other parties or in publishing this manuscript. There is no
conflict of interest with the publisher or the editorial team or the reviewers.
Attribution and Representation

All opinions and mistakes are the author(s)‘ own and cannot be attributed
to the institutions they represent. The publisher is also not responsible
either for such opinions and mistakes in the text or graphs or images.
Rights and Permissions
Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons

Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long
as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,
provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes
were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are
included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the
article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted
by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to
obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
85

***
To see original copy of these declarations signed by Corresponding/First
Author (on behalf of other co-authors too), please download associated zip
folder [Ethical Declarations] from the published Abstract page accessible
through and linked with the DOI: https://doi.org/10.33002/jelp030302.
86

Jelp03!03!02 Foyet Patricia m00356

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jelp03!03!02 Foyet Patricia m00356

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jelp03!03!02 Foyet Patricia m00356

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POLICY | 03(03) DECEMBER 2023

Published by The Grassroots Institute, in partnership with Yaroslav Mudriy National

ISSN 2564-016X | December 2023 M – 00356 | Research Article | Open Access

HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED CONSERVATION:

Received: 17 October 2023 | Accepted: 10 December 2023 | Published: 31 December 2023

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

1.1 Background and Context of Human Rights in Conservation

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

Traditional Indigenous peoples and local communities possess

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

Declarations relation to natural resources and conservation.

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

It is globally acclaimed that successful and sustainable conservation

1.2 Significance of the Role of Human Rights Director in Conservation

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

conservation, the director may need to adapt strategies and interventions to

Figure 1: Significance of the role of Human Rights Director in Conservation

•Conservation efforts that disregard

•Conservation projects can sometimes •Successful conservation initiatives require

Community Engagement and

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

•Human rights considerations add •Human rights laws and international

•Effective conservation requires building trust

Equitable Benefit Building Trust and

Impact Assessment Advocacy and

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

•Biodiversity and ecosystems are

Safeguarding Capacity Building and

Monitoring and Sustainable

In essence, the role of a Human Rights Director in conservation

1.3 Purpose and Objectives of the Paper

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

understanding in the subject matter, enabling professionals to effectively

Gaining a deep Equipping Developing

Figure 1: Purpose and objectives of Human Rights in Conservation studies

Different objectives of the paper can be illustrated as under:

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

5. To synthesize best practices for promoting human rights while

This paper is the synthesis of a pre-consultancy conducted for a key

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

 Finally, actionable recommendations were discussed based on the

3. HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONSERVATION: THE INTERSECTION

3.1 Overview of Human Rights Principles and Frameworks

3.2 Application of Human Rights to Conservation Contexts

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

contribute to the empowerment and well-being of communities, fostering a

3.3 Integration of Human Rights Considerations into Conservation

3.4 Conceptual Framework for Integrating Human Rights into

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

Figure 3: Framework for integrating Human Rights into Conservation

The sequence of boxes in figure 3 reflects a logical flow of

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

involves ensuring that affected individuals or communities are fully

3.5 Key Human Rights Issues in Conservation

1. Land and Resource Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of

access to natural resources for IPLCs becomes pivotal in addressing

Figure 4: Key Human Rights issues in Conservation

2. Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) in Conservation Projects: FPIC

Human Rights-Based Conservation: The Integral Role of