The Boy-Man, Masculinity and Immaturity in The Long Nineteenth Century Pete Newbon Download PDF
The Boy-Man, Masculinity and Immaturity in The Long Nineteenth Century Pete Newbon Download PDF
The Boy-Man, Masculinity and Immaturity in The Long Nineteenth Century Pete Newbon Download PDF
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-boy-man-
masculinity-and-immaturity-in-the-long-
nineteenth-century-pete-newbon/
textbookfull
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/traveling-irishness-in-the-long-
nineteenth-century-1st-edition-marguerite-corporaal/
https://textbookfull.com/product/militarized-cultural-encounters-
in-the-long-nineteenth-century-making-war-mapping-europe-joseph-
clarke/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-age-of-mammals-nature-
development-paleontology-in-the-long-nineteenth-century-1st-
edition-chris-manias/
https://textbookfull.com/product/a-history-of-economic-thought-
in-france-the-long-nineteenth-century-1st-edition-gilbert-
faccarello/
Pops in Pop Culture: Fatherhood, Masculinity, and the
New Man 1st Edition Elizabeth Podnieks (Eds.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/pops-in-pop-culture-fatherhood-
masculinity-and-the-new-man-1st-edition-elizabeth-podnieks-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/history-of-europe-in-the-
nineteenth-century-benedetto-croce/
https://textbookfull.com/product/theology-and-the-university-in-
nineteenth-century-germany-1st-edition-purvis/
https://textbookfull.com/product/drugs-and-the-addiction-
aesthetic-in-nineteenth-century-literature-adam-colman/
https://textbookfull.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-
loucas/
PALGRAVE STUDIES IN
THE HISTORY
OF CHILDHOOD
Series Editors
George Rousseau
University of Oxford, UK
Laurence Brockliss
University of Oxford, UK
Aims of the Series
Palgrave Studies in the History of Childhood is the first of its kind to
historicise childhood in the English-speaking world; at present no histor-
ical series on children/childhood exists, despite burgeoning areas within
Child Studies. The series aims to act both as a forum for publishing
works in the history of childhood and a mechanism for consolidating the
identity and attraction of the new discipline.
Editorial Board
Matthew Grenby (Newcastle)
Colin Heywood (Nottingham)
Heather Montgomery (Open)
Hugh Morrison (Otago)
Anja Müller (Siegen, Germany)
Sïan Pooley (Magdalen, Oxford)
Patrick Joseph Ryan (King’s University College at Western University, Canada)
Karen Vallgårda (Copenhagen)
Lucy Underwood (Warwick)
The Boy-Man,
Masculinity and
Immaturity in the
Long Nineteenth
Century
Pete Newbon
Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
vii
viii Acknowledgements
This book was written and researched while raising my three daugh-
ters, Molly, Martha, and Esme—all little cockneys and limber elves.
I thank them for reminding me of what it is to be a child, while teaching
me what it is to be a father.
Above all, I thank Rachel Hewitt for her love, and this book is dedi-
cated to her.
Contents
2 Self-Incurred Immaturity 27
4 Namby-Pamby Wordsworth 83
7 Lamb and the Age of Cant: Jokes, Puns and Nonsense 177
xi
xii Contents
Bibliography 315
Index 353
Abbreviations
xiii
xiv Abbreviations
Modern Immaturity
On 9 June 2009, the world was rocked by the news of the death of the
music virtuoso Michael Jackson, who died following an overdose of
sleeping pills administered by his personal physician. Although on the
verge of an attempted ‘come back’, the former king of pop music had,
for over a decade, lived as a recluse under a cloud of scandal and oppro-
brium. Raised as a musical prodigy in a strict, sometimes abusive, sexu-
ally repressive Jehovah’s Witness family, the child Jackson first appeared
on stage in the 1970s, under the spotlight at the tender age of seven as
the lead singer of the family band, The Jackson Five. Later, throughout
the 1980s and 1990s, through his combination of dynamic pop music,
unique singing voice, inimitable dancing and remarkable showmanship,
Jackson trailblazed his way to become the world’s most famous musician.
Yet this transition from precocious child star, to androgynous youthful
sex symbol was fraught with inner turmoil and public controversy.1 His
album HIStory (1995) featured a self-portrait on the cover sleeve titled
‘Childhood’, depicting Jackson as a boy, curled in a corner in an atti-
tude of frightened misery.2 One of the most remarkable—if not to say
infamous—aspects of Jackson’s tortured character was his obsessive iden-
tification with the eponymous hero of J. M. Barrie’s Peter Pan (1911).
As Jackson’s biographer Joseph Vogel observes, this was manifested most
ostentatiously in his luxury ranch, which he fittingly named ‘Neverland’:
Yet underlying this whimsical idyll was a darker aspect to Jackson’s fixa-
tion. Following the release of Dangerous (1991), allegations of rape and
child abuse began to circulate. These culminated in 1993 with a deluge
of allegations, which fundamentally rendered him unviable as a main-
stream entertainer.4 A New York Post headline of the time encapsulated
the public ambiguity over Jackson: ‘Peter Pan or Pervert?’5 Furthermore,
his increasingly unusual appearance as a consequence of his addiction to
plastic surgery—his body dysmorphia exemplifying his endless quest for
an eternally boyish face—and his publicly known dependence upon nar-
cotics and painkillers, made him evermore grotesque and ‘other’ under
the media gaze.6 Jackson’s death in 2009 evinced a complicated melange
of regret that the world had lost so powerful a musical star, with a form
of morbid fascination. As the queer theorist James R. Kincaid provoca-
tively expresses it:
Had Michael Jackson not existed, we would have been forced to invent
him, which is, of course, what we did…The hounding of Michael Jackson
is a spectacular case in point. Michael Jackson, to whose music we have
sent our children and our soft-drink companies with record piles of dollars,
is superchild and now super-child-molester.7
psychiatrist Dan Kiley’s The Peter Pan Syndrome: Men Who Have Never
Grown Up presented the condition of Barrie’s hero as a form of debili-
tating mental pathology (albeit one that never achieved inclusion in the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). On the Left, the
polemicist firebrand Neil Postman argued that modern, secular capital-
ism was eroding the distinctions between childhood and adulthood. In
his The Disappearance of Childhood (1994), Postman’s chief concern was
the sexualisation and excessive exposure of children to commercial soci-
ety. These, he argued, were effectively destroying the category of child-
hood as it had historically been understood.8 Since publishing, various
sociologists have cast sceptical doubt upon Postman’s thesis that such
recent innovations as television and video games augur the ‘loss’ or ‘end’
of childhood. Instead, they argue that modern defenders of childhood,
like Postman, overly essentialise the historical separateness of adults and
children.9 Yet a corollary of Postman’s argument is that, in tandem with
the accelerated maturation of children in modern societies, the state of
adulthood has been allowed to regress into self-incurred, perpetuated
immaturity—what he terms the ‘adult-child’.10
More recently, the historian Gary Cross excoriates a society in which
adult men across all tiers of society are devoted to the childlikeness of
modern hedonism—fixated with computer games and television culture
at the expense of personal, social and financial responsibility.11 Cross
attributes such failures of modern manhood to social transformations
of the twentieth century such as the decline of the patriarchal domes-
tic model, the increased material pleasurability of childhood and the
lure of modern consumer capitalism12: ‘The culture of the boy-man
today is less a stage of life than a lifestyle, less a transition from child-
hood to adulthood than a decision to live like a teen “forever”’.13 On
the political Right, the libertarian sociologist Frank Furedi argues that
the modern higher education system in Britain is betraying the legacy
of the Enlightenment through the ‘infantilisation’ of adults. For Furedi,
this is manifested through the oversimplification of academic learning
and the supposed mollycoddling of students, sheltering them from dis-
turbing subject matter.14 These disparate testimonies describe contempo-
rary perpetuated immaturity—especially male immaturity—as though it
were a novel phenomenon. Perhaps this is so, in terms of its social per-
vasiveness. But cultural anxieties about self-incurred immaturity, whether
as a moral foible, a pathological deviation, or perhaps—especially—as a
mark of idiosyncratic genius, is far from a singularly modern proclivity.
4 P. NEWBON
In that age, too, began the doubt as to whether this man or that was
‘grown-up’…Macaulay complains somewhere that in his day a man was
sure to be accused of a child-mind if no doubt could be cast ‘either on
the ability of his intelligence or on the innocence of his character’; now
nobody seems to have said this in the eighteenth century. Before the
Romantic Revival the possibilities of not growing up had never been
exploited so far as to become a subject of popular anxiety.16
through neglect.22 They were often born into lower middle-class fami-
lies with precarious finances. In childhood, boy-men tended to manifest
prodigious talent, especially in literature and the arts. Frequently, these
man-childs were abnormally small, afflicted by some debilitating illness,
disability or disfigurement, or some mental impediment.23 In adulthood,
such men might exhibit sexual irregularity, either through an aversion to
women, repressed homosexuality or paedophilic tendencies.24 Socially,
many of these individuals were uncomfortable in, and poorly suited to
circles characterised by nineteenth-century norms of manly behaviour.25
While often intellectually precocious, they tended towards introversion
and nostalgia for lost, Edenic childhood.
The boy-men of the Victorian and Edwardian ‘Golden Age’ were
inextricably defined by their identities as authors who wrote about
childhood for children. Their other identities and professions notwith-
standing, their outpourings for the children’s marketplace proved their
ultimate cultural monument. Fans of Lear were often surprised to dis-
cover he was an established landscape artist, with some international
standing.26 Friends noted, with some amusement, the remarkable dis-
parity between Dodgson the Oxford don and mathematician, and Lewis
Carroll, the author of Alice in Wonderland (1865) and The Hunting
of the Snark (1876).27 And while Barrie was the author of a variety of
Edwardian plays, composed for exclusively adult audiences, such works
have been thoroughly eclipsed by his immortal boy.28 Their definitive
yet distinctive works of the ‘Golden Age’ and fin de siècle are character-
ised by certain shared, recurrent themes and motifs. The child protago-
nists leave behind the world of adult rules, realities and responsibilities,
for fabulous, unpredictable paracosms of high adventure and anarchic
nonsense. In these fantastical realms, the regulations of grown-up exist-
ence are not merely suspended, but actively overturned and subverted
to light satiric effect. These wonderlands present refuges for the queer
and nonconforming, where conventional order is disrupted by chaotic
age inversion. In the cases of Carroll’s Alice, and Barrie’s Darling chil-
dren, the tales are marked by denouement, with the return to reality.29
But for Lear’s ‘Owl and the Pussycat’, ‘Jumblies’ and ‘The Nutcrackers
and Sugar-Tongs’, or Barrie’s Peter Pan himself, there is no return—
only further escapism into Neverland.30 Indeed, in Henry De Vere
Stacpoole’s ‘robinsonade’ The Blue Lagoon (1908), the family of chil-
dren marooned on a desert island are later discovered to have consumed
‘never wake up berries’ and have sunk into unending sleep.31
8 P. NEWBON
upon this premise, Plotz and others perceive the Romantic interest in
children and childhood as a particularly reprehensive expression of this
political bad faith.41 Plotz regards the so-called Romantic Child as a
woven mythology, actually used to distract from the very real horrors
facing the children of the poor: ‘it is no surprise that the Romantic dis-
course managed to produce a glorified solitary essential child at the same
time that it relegated most actual historical children to obscurity’.42 A
natural corollary of Plotz’s premise is that the figure of the Romantic
boy-man is, therefore, especially morally odious and grotesque. To
some degree, I am sympathetic to aspects of Plotz’s argument: there are
irrefutably narcissistic and pathetic elements of grown-up childhood.
Moreover, many of the actions and writings of these unusual men are not
undeserving of censure. Yet my own argument differs in crucial respects
from Plotz’s. Plotz sees the ‘Romantic Child’ and the ‘Romantic boy-
man’ as motivated by a retreat from the fearful tribulations of the French
Revolution. Conversely, throughout this study, I endeavour to illus-
trate how much of the discourse of immaturity was bound-up with this
very political culture. I argue both that the nature of the boy-man is a
product of the political changes to the late Georgian public and domes-
tic spheres, and that boy-men actively drew upon their childlikeness as a
form of political, countercultural subversion.
Queer Boy-Men
The Boy-Man is an interdisciplinary study, synthesising cultural history
and literary historicism.43 The very hybrid nature of the boy-man him-
self as a figure of literary history highlights the necessity of historicising
him in the context of the discourses of both childhood and masculin-
ity. These, as it will become clear, are fraught categories with their own
historiographical difficulties to address. The question of why childhood
became a particularly desirous, idealised form of identity in the minds of
some writers will be broached in both Chapters 2 and 3. But boy-men
were not children, but adults who identified to an abnormal degree with
the seeming virtues of their childhoods. They must, then, be understood
in parallel with the normative discourses of manhood of their era, and
as a somewhat deviant subculture of nineteenth-century masculinity. To
this end, I draw upon certain aspects of Queer Theory in order to inter-
pret the age inversion of the grown-up child, where it subverts conven-
tional gendered and sexual expectations. There has been a disciplinary
12 P. NEWBON
Fathers and Ephebes
A central argument of this monograph is that, historically, the criterion
of literary and cultural merit has been inflected by the language and val-
ues of masculinity. The ways in which boy-men perceived themselves, the
ways in which they were read in their context, and the processes whereby
they have been canonically preserved—or marginalised—were influenced
by the extent to which critical readers perceived them as being ‘manly’,
‘mature’, serious and edifying, or, rather, as ‘unmanly’, and therefore
effete, trivial, puerile, trite, nonsensical, or even morally corrosive. This
thesis requires an understanding of the way in which nineteenth- and
twentieth-century cultural criticism was ideologically structured in terms
of a gendered hierarchy. In his work on eighteenth- and nineteenth-cen-
tury masculinities, the historian Matthew McCormack cautions that
these new historical narratives, in this field, run the risk of merely laps-
ing back into traditional, patriarchal accounts of ‘great men’.51 Yet a
focal argument of The Boy-Man is that the subjects of this monograph
have been deemed defective men-of-letters and thus unworthy of the
title ‘great men’. Indeed, a central tenet of my thesis is that while the
emergence of a culture of age inversion in the eighteenth century engen-
dered these unusual writers, parallel, simultaneous mutations in ideol-
ogies of masculinity also worked towards their cultural marginalisation.
As I shall illustrate, such canonical writers as Wordsworth and Keats
were, in their historical context, derided mercilessly for their ‘namby-
pamby’ writings. Conversely, authors like Lamb, Hunt, Hartley, Hood
and De Quincey were all successful, popular authors in the Romantic
era, whose canonical fortunes were victim to a process of relegation.
This, ironically, owed much to the childlike whimsy of their works for
which they had initially been celebrated. Much of this book is con-
cerned with the processes of literary criticism and reception history
which tended to stigmatise the boy-men and their writings, both in
the period of their composition and across subsequent periods. In dis-
cussing the seditious character of ‘cockney’ culture, I draw upon Terry
14 P. NEWBON
FRUIT MARKET.
Several fruits claim the second place in this scale. Some
Europeans would place the rambutan next the mangostin, and
others would prefer the mango or the duku. The rambutan
(Nephelium lappaceum) is nearly as large as an apple-tree. The fruit
is globular in form, and an inch or an inch and a half in diameter. The
outside is a bright-red rind, ornamented with coarse, scattered
bristles. Within is a semi-transparent pulp, of a slightly acid taste,
surrounding the seed. This tree, like the durian and the mangostin, is
wholly confined to the archipelago, and its acid fruit is most
refreshing in those hot lands. At Batavia it is so abundant in February
and March, that great quantities almost line the streets in the market
parts of the city, and small boats are seen filled to overflowing with
this bright, strawberry-colored fruit.
The mango-tree (Mangifera indica) is a large, thickly-branching
tree, with bright-green leaves. Its fruit is of an elliptical form, and
contains a flat stone of the same shape. Before it is ripe it is so
keenly acid, that it needs only to be preserved in salt water to be a
nice pickle for the table, especially with the universal curry. As it
ripens, the interior changes from green to white, and then to a bright
yellow. A tough outer skin being removed, there is seen a soft,
almost pulpy, but somewhat fibrous mass within. Some of these
fruits are extremely rich, and quite aromatic, while others have a
sharp smack of turpentine. They even vary greatly in two localities,
which may be but a few miles apart. Rumphius informs us that it was
introduced into the moluccas by the Dutch in 1655. It has also been
introduced into Zanzibar and Madagascar. When the Spaniards first
visited the Philippines it was not noticed, but now it is very common
in those islands, and considerable quantities of it are shipped to
China, where I was frequently assured it was very delicious; but
those who have tasted this or any other tropical fruit from only one
locality are by no means competent judges. At Singapore I found
some very nice ones that had been brought down from Siam. It also
flourishes in India, and Mr. Crawfurd thinks, from the fact that the
Malay and Javanese names are evidently only corruptions of the old
Sanscrit, that it was originally brought into the archipelago from the
continent, and should not be regarded as indigenous.