0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views

P1 - Pagenumber

Uploaded by

TEJASWINI VJ
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views

P1 - Pagenumber

Uploaded by

TEJASWINI VJ
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL

2583-0384

VOLUME 4 || ISSUE 1

2024

This Article is brought to you for “free” and “open access” by the Legal Lock Journal. It has
been accepted for inclusion in the Journal after due review.
___________________________________________________________________________
To submit your Manuscript for Publication at Legal Lock Journal, kindly email your
Manuscript at [email protected].
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

SAFEGUARDING THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT FROM VARIOUS


SOURCES OF POLLUTION

TEJASWINI VJ1 & SUBHALAKSHMI MA2

ABSTRACT:

Humans have a complex relationship with water. At least 3.3 billion people rely significantly
on marine products for sustenance as it supplies fresh water, oxygen, moderate climate,
influence weather, and even connect every form of pollution and environmental harm.
However, there is a need to protect and preserve the marine environment. This article mainly
focuses on highly tropical problems such as marine plastic pollution, oil spills that happened
in past years, and pollution from land bases sources resulting in harming marine life and their
ecosystem. Here we report using principle of common heritage of mankind and various
international agreements, treaties and conventions ratified by the Parliament of India as the
Judiciary is showing keen interest in the environmental issues affecting various aspects of the
life of human beings passed appropriate orders, directions and writs against persons adversely
affecting the environment and the need for protection of this ecosystem has been
acknowledged worldwide and UNCLOSE 1982 prescribe the responsibility on the coastal
states in preserving and protecting the marine and environment and associated resources.

The research uses a mixed methods approach, including both doctrinal and non-doctrinal
approach, to comprehend the subtleties of marine environmental protection. First, a thorough
literature analysis examines previous research on marine pollution in order to identify
historical and societal trends that have influenced the current situation.

When regional approaches are being made for a healthy environment by addressing the
problem of marine activities causing marine pollution the objective can be achieved easily.
National and international level attempts are being made to establish Marine Protected Areas
(MPAs). We would also discus about several legislative initiatives for ocean conservation to
address the issue of marine environment pollution.

This observation also found a significant barrier to the field of marine environment protection
is a lack of public awareness, which has to be addressed adequately.

1
The Author, is a 4th B.Com.LL.B (Hons.), School of Excellence in Law, TNDALU.
2
The Co-Author, is a 4th B.Com.LL.B (Hons.), School of Excellence in Law, TNDALU.

1
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

KEYWORDS: Marine pollution, Oil spills, Environmental protection, Convention, Laws


governing sea, International waters.

INTRODUCTION:

We have forgotten how to be good guests, how to walk lightly on the earth
as its other creatures do. – Barbara Ward

The above words indicate that human's interaction towards nature is diminishing in the past
few decades. Environmental pollution, destruction, increase in sea level, failure of monsoon
has seriously threatened, human life and health. But a proper balance of ecosystem is
necessary for the current situation. The one solution to tackle the existing problem is
sustainable development or to implement the existing laws effectively. In India since the
ancient times i.e. the Vedic period it has been the main objective of human kind is to protect
and preserve the environment and the five elements of nature called the Pancha Mahabhuta,
i.e, Prithvi (Earth), Jal (water), Agni (Fire), Aakasha (space) to live in harmony with the
surrounding environment and various creatures inhabiting the earth.

MARINE POLLUTION:

Marine pollution is defined as “Introduction of man, directly or indirectly, of substances or


energy into the marine environment (including eatuaries) resulting in such deleterious affect
as human to living resources, hazard to human health, hindrance to marine activities
including fishing, impairment of quality for use of seawater and reduction of amenities.” By
the GESAMP (Group of Experts on Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection).
In simple marine pollution is a combination of chemicals and trash, most of which comes
from land sources and is washed or blown into the ocean. This pollution results in damage to
the environment, to the health of all organisms, and to economic structures worldwide.

The phrase “blue economy,” which has gained popularity in the last ten years, refers to an
endeavour to acknowledge and manage the risks that come with an economy around the
ocean, while also trying to capitalise on the potential it presents. It's basically the ocean
version of the “green economy,” a decarbonised, regenerative, and more just economic
structure. The 'blue economy’ gained prominence at the 2012 UN Convention on Sustainable
Development (UNCSD), or Rio+20 conference, when small island developing states began

2
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

emphasising the importance of the ocean and marine economy in response to land-focused
calls for a ‘green economy’.3
Six origins of marine pollution have been distinguished in the UNCLOS Convention. The
major danger to the oceans is contamination from land-based sources. These include
municipal,
engineering and farming wastes which get in touch with the ocean from rivers, estuaries,
pipelines and outfall constructions.4 The second pollution source is offshore seabed action
like drilling for oil, which has created new hazards in recent decades where recent demand
for offshore oil and gas resources has speedily increased throughout the world. The other
sources include nuclear water plants, factories releasing cooling water, pesticides applied to
farmland flowing into river with rain which finally reaches the ocean which often resulting
disadvantage to marine life and people depending on it.

LAND BASED SOURCE OF MARINE POLLUTION:


Various studies show that vast majority i.e, 8% of marine pollution is caused by land-based
sources. These include sewage outfalls, industrial discharges, runoff from urban storm water
and agriculture, river borne, airborne pollution, litter, can also be transported through the air
such as by vehicle emissions.
Recognising the condition going out of hands the 1992 United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development agreed to advance the subject. Agenda 21 invited the United
Nations Environment Programme to convene a meeting on land-based sources as soon as
practicable and identified priority actions for control of these sources and recommended
updating the 1985 Montreal Guidelines for the Protection of the Marine Environment against
Pollution from Land Based Sources, assessing the effectiveness of regional agreements on
land-based sources and the formulating of new regional agreements where appropriate, and
providing guidance on appropriate technologies and the development of policy guidance for
relevant global funding mechanisms. International conference on land-based sources of
marine pollution held in Washington, DC, in November 1995. It produced the Global
Programme of Action (GPA) for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-based
Activities, for which UNEP is Secretariat. Financing for implementation is available through
the International Waters Funds of the Global Environment Facility ("GEF"). The GPA is the
only global intergovernmental mechanism directly addressing the connection between

3
Silver et al. 2015, Dornan et al. 2018.
4
See UNCLOS Convention; Art 207-12. (1969).

3
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

terrestrial, freshwater, coastal and marine ecosystems. Its aim is to sustain action to prevent,
reduce, control and eliminate marine degradation from land-based activities. Every five years,
Intergovernmental Review Meetings (IGR) are held to assess how well each country is
implementing the GPA through its national action plan and to offer guidance on any future
implications.5

DEEP SEA MINING OR OCEAN MINING SOURCE OF MARINE POLLUTION:


Another source of ocean pollution is deep-sea ocean mining. Sulphide deposits can be found
up to 3,000 metres below the ocean's surface at ocean mining sites who drill for silver, gold,
copper, cobalt, and zinc.
Many ocean contaminants are discharged into the environment far upstream from seashores,
says National Geographic. Farmers that apply nitrogen-rich fertilisers inland, for instance,
eventually deposit their fertilisers in estuaries, bays, and deltas after finding their way into
nearby waterways, rivers, and groundwater. Massive blooms of algal species caused by these
surplus nutrients have the potential to deplete the water's oxygen supply, making places
unsuitable for the existence of marine life.

VESSEL BASED SOURCE OF MARINE POLLUTION:


The waters become polluted by a variety of processes, such as cleaning oil tankers, getting rid
of cargo residue, having ships collide, or having big oil tankers sink in the ocean. Oceans,
canals, and ports are contaminated by enormous amount of oil that has leaked into the sea,
killing numerous marine life forms. Even noise pollution from large ships and vessels upsets
and affects marine life. Thus, ships contribute to marine contamination in a negative way.
Oil pollution comprises about 71% of vessel-based marine pollution. The total annual oil
spillage into the oceans is estimated at one million tonnes dumped in standard operations and
200,000 tonnes spilled in tanker accidents per year.
According to the reports, despite the efforts of cleaning up after the Exxon Valdez oil spill
in 1989 a study of 2007 conducted by the National Oceanic and atmospheric administration
(NOAA) found that 26000 gallons of oil from the Exxon Valdez oil spill was still found in the
sand along the Alaska shoreline that is why it is regarded as the most dangerous
environmental disaster which cannot be removed even after years. The scientists also
revealed that the oil was declining less than 4 percent rate annually.

5
UNITED NATIONS INFORMATION PORTAL ON MULTILATERAL ENVIRONMENTAL
AGREEMENTS, Unit 5, Land based source of marine pollution.

4
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

The International Maritime Conference in Washington, D.C., adopted the first international
treaty on oil pollution in 1926. Nevertheless, this proposal was not approved. There are no
specific global environmental conventions that clearly govern marine contamination,
especially when it involves oil. A number of international law articles take this type of
pollution into consideration. Yet there aren't many restrictions on this matter in the
international conventions. After the Stockholm declaration which addressed the issue of
human and living organisms living under the sea 's health are in danger because of the
substances that spilled into sea and stressed the view on liabilities and penalty for doing such
acts, Geneva convention of 1958 addressed a few regarding this issue and made another
important convention for UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea).
The UNCLOS Convention provides that “States shall co-operate on an inclusive basis and,
as apposite, on a regional basis, directly or through capable intercontinental organizations,
taking into account attribute provincial features.”6
Insofar as values for combating pollution are concerned, the UNCLOS Convention calls upon
states “acting especially through competent international organizations or diplomatic
conference” to “endeavour to establish global and regional rules, standards and recommended
practices and procedures to prevent, reduce and control pollution.”7
Following these there were several other conventions that had been made for protecting and
regulating the maritime environment and marine shipping. Some notable conventions are,

- INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION (IMO):


An international convention that established the Inter-Governmental Maritime
Consultative Organisation (IMCO), formally was accepted at a conference held in
Geneva in 1948. Later in 1982 it changed to International Maritime Organisation
(IMO).8 The IMO Convention entered into force in 1958 with an aim to promote safe
shipping and cleaner seas. It has the responsibility, inter alia, to establish rules for
prevention of marine pollution from ships.

6
UNCLOS Convention, Art. 237.
7
Epstein PR, Sherman B, Spanger-Siegfried E, Langston A, and Prasad S, Marine ecosystems: Emerging
diseases as indicators of change, The Centre for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard Medical School,
85 p. (1998)
8
Convention on the Intergovernmental Maritime Conductive Organisation.

5
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

Since, IMO addressed vessel-based marine pollution prior to the negotiation of UNCLOS, the
Law of Sea did not elaborate operational controls for vessels, instead referring to standards
established by the "competent international organisation," in this case the IMO.9

- INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE PREVENTION OF


POLLUTION OF THE SEA BY OIL (OILPOL):
The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution of the Sea by Oil
(OILPOL) adopted in 1954 was the outcome of negotiations made by the government
of the United Kingdom and provided certain functions to IMO. The Convention
establishing IMO and OILPOL convention entered into force within few months gap.
OILPOL applied to tankers engaged in the transportation of oil. It prohibited
discharge of persistent oil or oily mixtures of greater than 100 parts per million within
fifty nautical miles of land or within special areas and regulated the rates of discharge.

- INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE PREVENTION OF


POLLUTION FROM SHIPS (MARPOL):
- The IMO's efforts to develop more comprehensive approaches to address maritime
pollution beyond oil resulted in MARPOL, the International Convention for the
Prevention of Pollution from Ships. The Convention was adopted in 1973, altered by
the 1978 Protocol, and entered into force in 1983 superseding OILPOL. 1973
MARPOL applies to ships flying or entitled to fly the flag of parties and ships
operating under the authority of a party but excludes warships, naval auxiliary and
ships owned or operated by a state and used only on government non-commercial
service (article 3).
The core of 1973 MARPOL lies in its annexes that deal with all types of pollution by
ships (excluding dumping), rather than oil discharges alone. MARPOL's six annexes
deal with: (I) pollution by oil, (II) pollution by noxious liquid substances in bulk, (III)
pollution by harmful substances carried by in packaged form, (IV) sewage, (V)
garbage, and (VI) air pollution.
INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON OIL POLLUTION PREPAREDNESS,
RESPONSE AND COOPERATION (OPRC):

9
Ward JR, Lafferty KD (2004) The Elusive Baseline of Marine Disease: Are Diseases in Ocean Ecosystems
Increasing? P. 120.

6
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

Work by the IMO on vessel accidents and emergencies that threaten the marine environment
led to development of the International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response
and Cooperation (OPRC) adopted in 1990, which came into force in 1995. It was followed by
a Protocol relating to hazardous and noxious substances (OPRC-HNS Protocol), which was
adopted in 2000 and entered into force in 2007.
The OPRC-HNS Protocol applies to any substance other than oil that, if introduced into the
marine environment, is likely to pose a threat to human health, affect living resources and
marine life, damage amenities, or interfere with other lawful uses of the sea. It guarantees that
readiness and response protocols are similar to those already in place for oil incidents.

INDIAN LAW AND ENVIRONMENT:


The Indian Constitution, when it was first established, has no specific provisions for
environmental preservation. Perhaps the founders of the Indian Constitution did not consider
the environment to be a critical problem back then. Constitution of India talks about the right
to life and personal liberty,10 it states that “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal
liberty except according to procedure established by law.” This article imposes a duty on the
state to protect the life and liberty of the people. The Indian Judiciary while dealing with
cases relating to environment considered the right to clean or the good environment as
fundamental to life and upheld it as a fundamental right. The Judiciary has played a vital role
in interpreting the Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
In India after the Stockholm Conference in 1976, under the 42nd Amendment of the
Constitution Article 48-A and Article 51-A (g) were inserted in the Indian Constitution.
Article 48-A placed environment as responsibility of the state government under the
Directive Principles of State Policy. Article 51-A (g) made environmental protection and
conservation a Fundamental Duty of all the citizens of India.

LANDMARK JUDGEMENT:
MC Mehta V. Union of India (Kanpur Tanneries case)11

10
Article 21, Constitution of India.
11
In M.C Mehta vs Union of India, AIR1988 SCR 538.

7
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

MC Mehta an advocate who's also an activist filed a writ petition enlightening the pollution
in river Ganges. Further, the court ordered the various tanneries to wind up. And also
highlighted that how industries are not eligible to exist when it cannot pay minimum wages,
if one industry which couldn't set up a primary treatment plant also not permitted to be in
existence.
S. Jagannath V. Union of India & Ors.12
As the decrease in resources of sea and pollution was increasing in the marine environment,
UN conference on human environments in Stockholm, 1972 uttered its serious concern and
ordered other nations to take necessary action on pollutants.
Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum V. Union of India and Others.13
The petitioner organisation was concerned about water pollution resulting from the discharge
of untreated effluents by tanneries and other industries into river Palar in the State of Tamil
Nadu, which was a source of drinking water supply. The Supreme Court directed the
constitution of an authority under the Environment Act to deal with the situation created by
the tanneries and other polluting industries in the State. The authority was also directed to
frame and execute scheme(s) for reversing ecological/environmental damage caused by
pollution in the State. It also imposed pollution fine on all the tanneries, and ordered the
closure of tanneries that fail to pay the fine.
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action V. Union of India and Others.14
In this particular case it was alleged that water in wells and streams in village Bichhri in
Udaipur district in the State of Rajasthan had become unfit for consumption as a result of
disposal of untreated toxic sludge from an industrial complex located within the limits of the
village. The Supreme Court held that the respondents were absolutely liable to pay
compensation for the harm caused by them to the villagers in the affected area and
surrounding areas as well as to the environment.
M. Nizamudeen V. M/s. Chemplast Sanmar Limited and Others.15
The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF) granted environment clearance to the
project proposed by Chemplast for manufacturing Poly-Vinyl Chloride (PVC) and to install a
Marine Terminal Facility ('MTF') near the seashore for receiving and transferring Vinyl

12
S. Jagannath Vs. Union of India & Ors [1996] INSC 1592 (11 December 1996), 1996 Latest Caselaw 1036
SC.
13
Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v Union of India and Ors, AIR 1996 SC 2715(India).
14
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India and Ors, AIR 1996 SC 1446(India).
15
M. Nizamudeen v M/s. Chemplast Sanmar Limited and Ors, AIR 2010 SUPREME COURT 1765, 2010 (4)
SCC 240, 2010 AIR SCW 1937, 2011 BOMCRSUP 127, (2010) 1 WLC(SC)CVL 468, (2010) 4 MAD LJ 333.

8
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

Chloride Monomer (VCM) from the ships to the PVC plant through underground pipeline
under the provisions of under the provisions of Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 1991.
Chemplast made an application to the Executive Engineer, PWD, seeking permission for
carrying seawater and raw materials through pipelines laid 3.50 meter below the riverbed.
The Executive Engineer granted permission but in less than a month cancelled the aforesaid
permission observing that VCM may cause pollution and health hazard to the public.
The Madras High Court set aside the order of the Executive Engineer revoking the
permission granted; it was then that the appellant filed PIL before the High Court praying
therein that the order granting permission by the Executive Engineer be quashed and
Chemplast be directed to forebear from laying of pipelines for drawing VCM raw-material
from jetty to their plant. The petition was dismissed.
The first question which the apex court analysed is whether Uppanar river and its banks at the
point where pipelines pass, fall in the CRZ III area. In that case the pipelines crossing
underneath Uppanar river would require environmental clearance. The other main question to
consider is whether paragraph 2(ii) of 1991 Notification restricts transfer of VCM (hazardous
substance) beyond port area to the PVC plant through pipelines. According to the Court,the
permission granted to Chemplast by the MOEF is in exercise of the powers conferred under
paragraph 3(2)(ii) of 1991 Notification, thus held no illegality in the permission granted by
the Executive Engineer, as Uppanar river and its banks at the relevant place where the
pipelines laid by the Chemplast pass do not fall under CRZ III area as per 1996 Plan for the
purposes of demarcation and classification of CRZ area in the state of Tamil Nadu, and no
environmental clearance is needed for such pipelines. Appeals are dismissed.

ENNORE PORT OIL SPILL TRAJECTORY:


In south India, the region is located in Chennai, (Ernavour/ Ennor). In 2017 the Liquefied
Petroleum Gas (LPG) tanker and a chemical tanker of Kanchipuram collided near 2 nautical
miles of Ennore port which resulted in 196.4 metric tons of Heavy Furnace Oil (HFO)
spillage. This was taken care of by Indian Coast Guards.But after the recent Michaung
cyclone, the Ennore people faced the huge crisis due to oil spillage from CPCL, it affects
nearly 20.sq.kms. which affected to the extent of every wall in Ernavour has the oil spill
prints from the water flooded during the cyclone rainfall. The residents over there are also
undergoing several medical issues due to this. If the laws were effective enough to bring the

9
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

protection marine environment from oil spillage it would also be betterment for the human
living around such an environment.

LAWS IN INDIA RELATED TO MARINE ENVIRONMENT:


India has also made various acts and rules in the field of marine environment protection, the
main Acts and Rules regulating coastal and marine activities in India include:
1. Indian Fisheries Act 1899 and its amendments in 1920 and 1980
2. Indian Ports Act 1902
3. Merchant Shipping Act 1974
4. Wildlife Protection Act 1972(Amended in 1991 and then in 2002)
5. Water (Prevention and control of Pollution) Act 1974
6. Indian Coast Guard Act 1974
7. Marine Zones of India Act (Regulation of fishing by foreign vessels) Act 1981
8. Environmental Protection Act 1986.
The implementation and execution of the provisions of the acts have never been adequate. At
most times these laws are just in paper.

ANALYSIS FROM THE SURVEY CONDUCTED:


We have conducted a survey by asking several questions to more than 100 people from
different fields like students, professors, IT professionals and so on.
In which we asked, “what do you think as a due cause for marine environment pollution?”
58.10% people think that pollution from land by plastics and several other wastes are the
major reason and 25.71% people have chosen the option of oil spills and here some people
have told us that E-waste and industrial emissions, waste & other pollutants from deep sea
mining.
Then in a question “Do you know that there are various international conventions related to
environmental law addressing marine environmental pollution?” 70% of people have said yes
and also said they're not effectively implemented enough and 30% of other people have said
that there may be a few legislations existing but not aware of those.
For the question “Are laws relating to marine environmental pollution being effectively
implemented?” 74.29% of people voted No and 13% have said that implementation could be
more effective in order to curb pollution to the maximum extent possible.

10
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

For “why is it needed to be protected?” 38% of people have said that it should be protected
for Organisms living under sea and 10% of people say it for global warming and some of
them have said that to maintain ecological balance and for the betterment of the whole
biodiversity.
SUGGESTION BY PARTICIPATED PEOPLE IN SURVEY:
- Most of the people were insisting on getting rid of single use plastics and regulating the
proper waste management.
- Regulating proper regulations on disposal of industrial emissions and waste
- Preventing global warming with required measures
- Implementing the existing laws in an effective manner and bringing stringent punishment to
the offenders thereon
- Promoting sustainable fishing practices where in controlling the limit of fishing and
reducing habitat destruction
- Creating awareness among the people about the provisions available thereby
- People should be educated about the consequences of the plastic debris in the sea , which
are hazardous to organisms living in the sea.
- Stringer provisions and proper execution of those.
- Banning/suspending the vessel or tankers which may seem to cause the accident.
- The stoppage of dumping the waste should start from small water bodies which will
eventually end up in the ocean.

SUGGESTION:
This paper suggests seven key actions to assist states and international organisations in
supporting and improving humanity’s diverse relationships with the ocean by fostering
participatory democratic governance:
1. humanise the new ocean narrative by focusing economic development on the
objective of increasing human well-being.
2. Encourage diversity and inclusion within the sustainable maritime economy.
3. Collaborate with a diverse group of ocean allies, including small-scale fishermen,
community elders, social and environmental activists, indigenous people, and women
working in the maritime sector to protect marine habitats.
4. Increase the capability of meso-level institutions below the national government and
above the individual citizen-consumer.

11
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

5. Ecological-based management, if properly developed, legally implemented and


effectively enforced, organisation instruments can add more coherent,
multi-spectrally synchronised management of the use, preservation and defence of
the marine and coastal surroundings and its resources.
6. In addition to institutional frameworks for ocean interaction, regional organisations
and conventions, both within and outside the UN system, have become increasingly
important for action. Ecological global programs are implemented at a regional level
by organisations with Contracting Parties located closer to the problem. So local
experts can effectively address local needs and goals, such as pollution reduction and
marine protected zones.
7. While many regions have significant assessment capabilities, there is a need for
global experience and communication in marine appraisal technology.

CONCLUSION:
Our oceans and seashores supply living space and they directly and indirectly create money,
including millions of jobs in industries such as fishing, aquaculture, and tourism. The marine
environment includes the water of the ocean, the seabed, its subsoil, all marine life of the sea
and coastal habitats. Marine resources are the precious assets and heritage that must be
protected, conserved and properly utilised. The human relationship with the ocean is diverse
and complex. It gives food in the form of fish and shellfish it is used for transportation for
both travelling and shipping for commercial purposes. It is mined for minerals e.g. salt, sand,
gravel, and some manganese, copper, nickel, iron and cobalt can be found in the deep sea and
drilled for crude oil. The ocean indirectly contributes to the process of eradication of carbon
from the atmosphere and providing oxygen which regulates earth's climate. The ocean also
provides resources for biomedical organisms with huge potential for fighting disease and
much more. Therefore, a clean healthy and safe marine environment is a part and parcel of
the basic human right to live a healthy and fulfilling life.
Despite the fact that several laws have been enacted to safeguard biodiversity, appropriate
implementation and public awareness remain essential. Exploiting marine biodiversity is
necessary, but it must be done sustainably. The precise records of marine life and changes
must be carefully kept. The Indian Ocean Biogeographic Information System (IndOBIS) and
Census of Marine species programs have been created to consolidate all information about
marine species and changes occurring beneath the sea. It made available through a portal and

12
ISSN: 2583-0384 LEGAL LOCK JOURNAL VOL. 4 ISSUE 1

is an internationally recognised data protocol. Concerned individuals and indigenous


communities should be informed about such technological advancements to utilise it.
The menace of accumulation of plastic and its clearance from the sea needs to be solved.
Many national and regional monitoring programs exist for monitoring a variety of pollutants.
In India, coastal water quality is being monitored for last 25 years at 24 priority sites. But in
spite of such available technologies and research and development opportunities, the quality
of marine environment has failed to come at par with other developed countries. Proper
legislative measures, socio economic analysis and integrated pollution management practices
of both marine and surrounding terrestrial areas are required to develop a sound marine
biodiversity conservation strategy.
Environmental impact assessments should be conducted in depth, and various principles,
such as polluters pay, should be implemented. Various NGOs and Coastal Zone Protection
units established in coastal areas should be supplied with the required technical expertise and
financial support. Furthermore, every environmental preservation strategy should include
scientific research, raising awareness, and involving the local population.

13

You might also like