Download full Children, Young People and the Press in a Transitioning Society Faith Gordon ebook all chapters
Download full Children, Young People and the Press in a Transitioning Society Faith Gordon ebook all chapters
Download full Children, Young People and the Press in a Transitioning Society Faith Gordon ebook all chapters
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/children-young-people-and-
the-press-in-a-transitioning-society-faith-gordon/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWLOAD EBOOK
https://textbookfull.com/product/skills-in-counselling-and-
psychotherapy-with-children-and-young-people-lorraine-sherman/
https://textbookfull.com/product/transgender-children-and-young-
people-1st-edition-heather-brunskell-evans/
https://textbookfull.com/product/young-people-in-the-labour-
market-past-present-future-youth-young-adulthood-and-society-1st-
edition-andy-furlong/
https://textbookfull.com/product/perspectives-on-palliative-care-
for-children-and-young-people-a-global-discourse-1st-edition-
fowler-kerry/
Children and Young People Living with HIV AIDS A Cross
Cultural Perspective 1st Edition Pranee Liamputtong
(Eds.)
https://textbookfull.com/product/children-and-young-people-
living-with-hiv-aids-a-cross-cultural-perspective-1st-edition-
pranee-liamputtong-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/think-good-feel-good-a-
cognitive-behavioural-therapy-workbook-for-children-and-young-
people-second-edition-stallard/
https://textbookfull.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-
loucas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/conditional-citizens-rethinking-
children-and-young-people-s-participation-1st-edition-catherine-
hartung-auth/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-solution-focused-approach-
with-children-and-young-people-current-thinking-and-practice-1st-
edition-denise-yusuf/
CHILDREN, YOUNG PEOPLE
AND THE PRESS IN A
TRANSITIONING SOCIETY
REPRESENTATIONS,
REACTIONS AND CRIMINALISATION
Faith Gordon
Series Editor
Dave Cowan
School of Law
University of Bristol
Bristol, UK
‘Children, Young People and the Press is exemplary critical criminology: an original
interdisciplinary study of young people and the print media in Northern Ireland
under transition. This multifaceted empirical investigation shows how the press has
targeted and demonised ‘deviant’ youth, and to what effect. Gordon’s work is thought-
fully structured, clear and lively in expression, and forceful in argument: a rich asset
for students of youth, media, law and society.’
—Scott Poynting, Western Sydney University
and Queensland University of Technology, Australia
‘Every generation seems to succumb to fears about the generations that follow. Such
moral panics about “the kids today” appear particularly misplaced in the context of a
society in transition from a troubled past like Northern Ireland. In this insightful and
rigorously evidenced analysis, Gordon argues instead in favour of listening to the
voices of young people themselves as they represent our best hope for a brighter
future.’
—Shadd Maruna, University of Manchester, UK
‘Conflict takes away childhoods and its legacy into the peace can destroy children’s
future. This expertly argued book draws on detailed research to address how children
are represented in the print media in transitional societies and how these representa-
tions contribute to the problems youth are seen as presenting. It is cogently argued,
very well written and erudite in its coverage. It is a wonderful addition to youth stud-
ies and transitional justice.’
—John D. Brewer, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland
Children, Young
People and the Press
in a Transitioning
Society
Representations, Reactions and
Criminalisation
Faith Gordon
University of Westminster
History, Sociology and Criminology
London, UK
The subject of children, young people and media representations has been
with me now for over a decade and throughout my journey, there were many
people who provided encouragement.
The writing of this book commenced during my time working in the
School of Law, Queen’s University Belfast. Thank you to my PhD supervisors,
Professor Phil Scraton and Professor Anne-Marie McAlinden, for their com-
ments and suggestions on my PhD study, which became the foundation for
this monograph. I would like to acknowledge The Department of Education
and Learning in Northern Ireland who provided me with a PhD scholarship,
which made the extended empirical research possible.
At Queen’s University, Professor Sally Wheeler, Head of School, Professor
Anne-Marie McAlinden, Director of Research and Professor Scott Poynting,
External Examiner (University of Auckland), were supportive in encouraging
me to submit a book proposal. Many thanks to Professor Dave Cowan, Series
Editor and Aléta Bezuidenhout, Palgrave for their support, guidance and
patience throughout the writing process. Most recently thank you to Steph
Carey and Josie Taylor for their support at the final stages of the submission
process.
Sincere thanks to the 28 interviewees who took time out of their busy
schedules to participate in the primary research. I am extremely grateful to the
33 children and young people who so generously gave up their leisure time to
participate and share their insights and experiences with me and to the subse-
quent 171 children and young people I met and engaged with during my
post-doctoral research project.
At home in Northern Ireland, I have a number of former colleagues and
friends who have maintained ongoing interest in my research and career
vii
viii Acknowledgements
evelopment and have provided guidance and friendship along the way:
d
Professor Norma Dawson; Professor Shadd Maruna; Professor Laura Lundy;
Professor John Brewer; Professor Joanne Hughes; Dr. Ciara Hackett; Dr.
Cheryl Lawther; Dr. John Stannard; Dr. Heather Conway; Dr. Bronagh Byrne;
Dr. Sharon Thompson; Koulla Yiasouma; Tara Mills, Ronan Lavery QC;
Sharon Whittaker; Natalie Whelehan; Edel Quinn; Niall Enright; Sara Boyce.
The monograph has travelled with me to my new home in London and I
am grateful to the new friendships and working relationships formed at the
University of Westminster, the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies and fur-
ther afield.
At the University of Westminster, I would like to thank my colleagues in
the Department of History, Sociology and Criminology for assisting me to
settle into a new city and the Department. In particular, I have benefitted
from the excellent mentoring of Professor Lisa Webley and Mr. Tony Burke.
Professor Webley has offered a tremendous amount of insight, support and
friendship – she remains an inspiration in terms of her teaching and research
achievements and she is one of the most collegial and supportive people I have
met in academia to date.
At the University of Westminster, encouragement has also been provided
by Neena Samota; Professor Sarah Niblock; Elaine Fisher; Dr. Margherita
Sprio; Juliet Allen, Dr. Petros Karatsareas; Dr. Russell Orr; Dr. Victoria
Brooks; Dr. Simon Flacks; Dr. Ed Bracho; Dr. Andy Aresti and Dr. Sacha
Darke and many others working in the Faculty of Social Sciences and
Humanities. Further to this, thanks are due to Professor Andrew Linn, Pro
Vice-Chancellor and Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities,
Dr. Martin Doherty, Professor Terry Lamb, Dr. Thomas Moore and Professor
Malcolm Kirkup for their support regarding the establishment of the Youth
Justice Network, which I am Director of at the University of Westminster.
My greatest thanks is to David Manlow, Course Leader in Criminology, for
his ongoing encouragement, positive energy and belief in me (especially when
my own self-belief waivered!) that I could make it across the finish line with this
project. His dedication to our students is truly inspirational and I am learning a
lot from him. It was the coffees and chats with David about the monograph
(plus his music suggestions) that has gotten me over the finish line!
More recently, I am grateful for the collegial support of the Information Law
and Policy Centre at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies. The Director of
the Centre, Dr. Nora NiLoideain has been extremely supportive of my research
interests and the development of my latest work in the area of children’s rights
in the digital age. I am very excited about undertaking my role as a Research
Associate of the Centre.
Acknowledgements
ix
xi
xii Contents
Bibliography 243
Index 279
Abbreviations
xiii
xiv Abbreviations
MP Member of Parliament
NGO Non-Governmental Organisation
NI Northern Ireland
NIACRO Northern Ireland Association for the Care and Resettlement of
Offenders
NICCY Northern Ireland Children’s Commissioner
NIHRC Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission
NIO Northern Ireland Office
NUJ National Union of Journalists
OAP ‘Old Age Pensioner’
OFCOM Office of Communications
PACE Police and Criminal Evidence (NI) Order 1989
PCC Press Complaints Commission
PHA Public Health Agency
POCVA Protection of Children and Vulnerable Adults (NI) Order 2003
PPS Public Prosecution Service Northern Ireland
PR Public Relations
PSNI Police Service of Northern Ireland
RA Irish Republican Army (colloquial abbreviation)
ROI Republic of Ireland
RUC Royal Ulster Constabulary
SAS Special Air Service
SBN South Belfast News
SDLP Social and Democratic Labour Party
SF Sinn Féin
TV Television
UDA Ulster Defence Association
UK United Kingdom
UN United Nations
UNCRC United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund
US/USA United States/United States of America
UTV Ulster Television
UUP Ulster Unionist Party
List of Tables
xv
Part I
The Theoretical Context
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The chronicles
of Enguerrand de Monstrelet, Vol. 09 [of 13]
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.
Language: English
CHRONICLES
OF
ENGUERRAND DE MONSTRELET.
H. Bryer, Printer, Bridge Street, Blackfriars, London.
THE
CHRONICLES
OF
ENGUERRAND DE MONSTRELET;
CONTAINING
AND OF OTHER
FRENCH,
Beginning at the Year mcccc. where that of Sir JOHN FROISSART finishes, and
ending at the Year
mcccclxvii. and continued by others to the Year mdxvi.
TRANSLATED
LONDON:
1810
.
CONTENTS
OF
HERE BEGINNETH
CHRONICLES
OF
ENGUERRAND DE MONSTRELET.
CHAP. I.
THE KING OF FRANCE, BEING SATISFIED THAT THE
ENGLISH HAD BROKEN THE TRUCE, DECLARES WAR
AGAINST THEM.—VERNEUIL IS TAKEN BY A MILLER,
WHOM AN ENGLISHMAN HAD BEATEN.
The king of France, having received full information of the warfare
carried on by the English against Scotland, which was included in the
truce, and of that against the Spaniards by sea, who were also
included in it, as well as that on his own subjects of Dieppe, la
Rochelle, and elsewhere, ever since the signing of the truce, without
making any restitution whatever for the damages done by them,
more especially in the capture of Fougeres from the duke of Brittany,
for which they refused to make any reparation, although often
summoned by the king so to do, as well by ambassadors to king
Henry as to those who had the government of Normandy: having,
therefore, maturely deliberated on all these grievances in his council,
and knowing that he had fully acquitted himself of his duty in
endeavouring to preserve peace, he declared war against England by
sea and land.
During the truce, the english garrisons of Mantes, Verneuil, and
Laigny had gone on the high roads between Orleans and Paris, and
had robbed and murdered all passengers and merchants that fell in
their way. In like manner did the English of Neufchâtel, Gournay, and
Gerberoy, on the roads between Paris, Abbeville, and Amiens: they
also made inroads over the country, seizing all they could lay hands
on, and murdering gentlemen in their beds, who had sworn
allegiance to the king of France; such as the lord de Maillebois, the
lord de St Remy, Olivier de Noirequerque, and several more.
On the other hand, such tradesmen and labouring farmers as had,
on the faith of the truce, returned to their occupations, houses, and
villages, were continually harrassed and put to death by the English,
who called them false Armagnac-traitors.
These were the fine exploits of the English during the existence of
the truce. They were called Vizards, from wearing masks and
frightful disguises over their other clothes, when they went on any
such expeditions, to prevent them being discovered.
To put an end to all these deceitful proceedings of the English, the
king of France assembled a large body of men at arms, as did the
duke of Brittany, on their frontiers. The garrison of Fougeres made a
sally on these last,—but they were repulsed so valiantly that they
lost upwards of six score in killed and taken.
At this time a miller in the town of Varneuil[1] was beaten by an
Englishman going the rounds. In revenge, he went to the bailiff of
Evreux, and promised, on certain conditions, to admit him and his
men into the town. In consequence of this, sir Pierre de Brésé,
seneschal of Poitou, the said bailiff of Evreux, Jacques de Clermont
and others, collected their men with all haste, and appeared before
the walls of Verneuil by break of day on the 29th day of July.
The miller was on guard this night, and dismissed the watch sooner
than usual because it was Sunday, that they might attend mass and
then breakfast. The French, by the aid of the miller, fixed their
ladders to his mill, and, by this means, entered the town without any
one knowing, or even suspecting it. Six score English were in
garrison, some of whom were killed or made prisoners, and the rest
fled in haste to the castle.
On the morrow, the miller drew off most part of the water from the
ditches of the castle, which was then vigorously attacked and
defended,—but at last it was taken by storm. Many gallant deeds
were done, particularly by the seneschal, who acquired greater
renown than any other, although all fought well, for they had not
any heavy artillery,—and numbers of the English were killed,
wounded, and taken. The remainder took shelter in the tour grise,
which was impregnable so long as provisions did not fail, being very
thick and high, and detached from the castle, surrounded with
ditches full of water. Notwithstanding its strength, the French
attacked it on all sides,—and while they were thus engaged, the
count de Dunois arrived with the lord de Culant and many other
knights and esquires. The first had been lately appointed lieutenant-
general of the armies of the king of France,—and the lord de Culant
had been made grand master of the household.
Having had information that lord Talbot was on his march to relieve
his countrymen in the tower, and was arrived at Breteuil[2], they
soon departed, leaving sir Florent Dilliers, who remained to manage
the siege, with about eight hundred combatants.
The count de Dunois kept advancing until he met lord Talbot near to
Harcourt[3], who, when he perceived the French, fortified himself so
strongly, with stakes and the baggage-carts which carried his stores,
that they could no way injure him. At nightfall, he retreated in haste
to Harcourt. All the ensuing day the French were drawn up in battle-
array in the expectation of an engagement, but Talbot would not
quit the town.
The following knights were this day created: the lord de Herbault, sir
John de Bar lord of Baugey, and John Daulon, equerry of the king's
stables; and the French, finding that Talbot would not come out of
Harcourt, withdrew that evening to Evreux.
On the sixth day of August, in this year, the king of France advanced
toward Amboise, to cross the river Loire, and march his army into
Normandy to support the besiegers of Verneuil. The count de Dunois
and his company remained two days in Evreux.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Verneuil,—a town in Normandy, diocese of Evreux.
[2] Breteuil,—a town in Normandy, near Conches.
[3] Harcourt,—a town in Normandy, election of Conches, ten
leagues from Rouen.
CHAP. II.
THE COUNT DE ST POL APPEARS BEFORE NOGENT,
WHICH SURRENDERS TO HIM.—THE CAPTURE OF POINT-
AUDEMER.
On Friday, the 8th day of August, in this year, the count de St Pol,
with about four hundred[4] horse, came before the castle of Nogent,
of whom twenty or thirty of the most valiant of the van, at the first
shock, forced their way into the lower court, and gained the barriers.
Fearing the cannon of the English, they instantly retreated, to wait
for their companions,—but not before the portcullis had been rapidly
let down, and inclosed two of their number, who were made
prisoners. On the approach of the main army, the place was
courageously attacked on the side toward the fields, when many
were killed and wounded on each side. The governor for king Henry
was called Jean le Fevre, born near to Louviers, who had with him
about thirty companions in arms.
On the Saturday, the place surrendered between eleven and twelve
o'clock, on condition that the garrison should march away in safety
unarmed, except the governor, who was to wear his sword. They
deposited all their effects in the church of St Peter, whence they
afterward came to seek and carry them away whither they pleased.
The conquerors, perceiving on the Sunday that the place was not
tenable, decamped, but not before they had set fire to it, and burnt
it to the ground.
The same Friday, the count de Dunois marched from Evreux with a
large company of knights and esquires, and two thousand five
hundred combatants. Two days after, the counts d'Eu and de St Pol,
the lords de Saveuses, de Roye, de Moy, de Rambures, and others,
to the number of three hundred lances, and from fourteen to fifteen
hundred archers, passed Pont de l'Arche, and continued their march
until they formed a junction, on the 12th before Pont Audemer, with
the count de Dunois and his army. The count de Dunois was posted
on the side toward Rouen, and the counts d'Eu and de St Pol nearer
to Honfleur, on the other side of the river Rille, which runs by the
town,—and each lord drew up his men to the attack of the place.
That part of it near to the quarters of the count de St Pol was so
courageously attacked that it was carried by storm, notwithstanding
the very gallant defence of the English. Many brilliant acts were
done by the count de Dunois' men, who entered the place at the
same time with the others, crossing the ditches with water up to
their necks.
Four hundred and twenty English retreated into a strong house at
the end of the town under their captains, Montfort, treasurer of
Normandy, and Foucques Ebon, who surrendered themselves
prisoners to the counts de Dunois and de St Pol.
Twenty-two new knights were made on this occasion, such as the
lord de Moy, the son of the vidame of Amiens, the son of the lord de
Rambures, and others. Thus was Pont Audemer replaced under the
obedience of the king of France.
King Charles came to Vendôme on this day, the 12th, and remained
there until the 18th day of August, when he marched for Chartres,
and arrived there on the 22d.
FOOTNOTES:
[4] Four hundred. In the original it is four thousand,—but this
number appeared to me too great.
CHAP. III.
THE ENGLISH INVADE SCOTLAND TWICE, AND ARE AS
MANY TIMES REPULSED[5].—THE TOWER OF VERNEUIL
SURRENDERS TO THE KING OF FRANCE.—OTHER
MATTERS.
It was evident that Heaven was against the English,—and they were
deserving of it, for it is a fact that they have alway encroached on
their Christian eighbours, as well in the kingdom of France as in
Scotland, Ireland, Wales, and elsewhere. Many violences have most
unjustly been done by them, by reason of their not having the words
of our Saviour Jesus Christ before their eyes, 'Render unto Cæsar the
things that be Cæsar's and unto God the things that be God's.'
Among their various plans of annoyance to their neighbours, they
carried one about this time into effect, namely, an invasion of
Scotland. The earl of Salisbury sent two lords of great renown,
natives of England, sir Thomas de Hanton, knight, and the lord
Percy, son to the earl of Northumberland, to wage war against
Scotland. They had with them fifteen thousand combatants and a
numerous body of peasants, and, crossing the river Solway, entered
Scotland, where they remained three days, having advanced six
miles of that country, equal to three french leagues.
When the earl of Douglas heard of this inroad, he collected, without
delay, six thousand Scots, and attacked the English on the plain in
open day. The battle was well fought on both sides, and many were
killed and wounded; but it was won by the Scots, who kept the field,
and made many prisoners: in the number were sir Thomas de
Hanton and Percy: the rest escaped as quickly as they could, to
carry the melancholy news to lord Salisbury. He was very much
grieved, and not without cause, but not cast down; for he instantly
raised a greater army than before, consisting of sixty thousand men,
thinking to destroy the whole kingdom of Scotland.
When the earls of Murray and of Ormond heard of the English
having crossed the Solway with a large army, they, having the fear
of God before their eyes, and finding the English determined thus
conjunctly to destroy their country, took measures to oppose them;
for it is perfectly lawful that every one should fight for his country.
They soon, with the aid of other scots lords, assembled a force of
thirty-two thousand able warriors, and, falling on the english camp
unawares, put them to the rout, with great slaughter and loss in
prisoners and wounded. They were pursued as far as the Solway,
wherein many were drowned. The English lost in these two invasions
from twenty to twenty-four thousand men in killed and prisoners.
The Scots gave all the merit of this signal defeat to God, and not to
human force, for which they celebrated a thanksgiving; and, to
prevent the English from being in future so eager to invade their
country, they resolved to continue the pursuit into England. Having
crossed the Solway, they destroyed the country, full twenty leagues
in length, and six in breadth, as far as the strong town of Newcastle,
without leaving a town or house on their road unburnt. On this
expedition, a knight of great power in Scotland was slain, called sir
John Vbouailles; and the Scots then returned unmolested home.
The account of these battles was given to the writer of the
Chronicles of St Denis, at that abbey, by three scots priests of the
diocese of Dunblaine, of which church one was a canon, and
affirmed it for true before the holy shrine of St Denis, in the manner
above related, and in the presence of the monks of that abbey.
On the 12th of August, the king of France came to Vendôme,
grandly accompanied by men at arms, as well lords, knights and
esquires, as others. He remained there until the 18th; and, during
this time, the lord de Lohéac, marshal of Brittany, sir Geoffry de
Couren[7], and Joachim Rohault and others, attacked the town of St
Jacques de Beuvron with great vigour from nine in the morning until
night, and, with heavy and small artillery, kept up a continual fire on