Sir Banister Fletcher S Global History o
Sir Banister Fletcher S Global History o
Sir Banister Fletcher S Global History o
scholarship. disciplinary approaches. This massively ex- the original works, Fraser defends the use
MARK ALAN HEWITT panded edition, the first to be published in of Sir Banister Fletcher’s name in the title
Independent scholar two volumes, signals an important depar- by affirming that “just as no man is an is-
ture from other global histories of architec- land, nothing stands anew” (1:xv).
Notes ture (including previous Banister Fletcher Preceding part 1, an engaging chapter
1. Key sources not cited include Robert Gutman, editions) in that it was jointly produced by by Catherine Gregg titled “Sir Banister
Architectural Practice: A Critical View (New York: many individuals. Noting the reliance on Fletcher’s A History of Architecture: The Fa-
Princeton Architectural Press, 1988); Dana Cuff, teamwork needed to pull the numerous ther, the Son, His Wife, and Their Book”
Architecture: The Story of Practice (Cambridge, contributions together, Fraser states that reveals the fascinating long history of this
Mass.: MIT Press, 1991); Mary N. Woods, From
this edition “indeed can be claimed as the work and includes a useful table with a
Craft to Profession: The Practice of Architecture in
Nineteenth-Century America (Berkeley: University largest collective research project to date in chronology of various Banister Fletcher edi-
of California Press, 1999); Mark Alan Hewitt, The architectural history” (1:xxiv). This work tions. The original 1896 edition, written by
Architect and the American Country House, 1890– demonstrates long-overdue humility in its both Professor Banister Fletcher and his
1940 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, recognition that authoritative knowledge son Banister Flight Fletcher, contained
1990).
BOOKS 485
may still prompt some to refer to his approach that puts large parts of the globe Architecture” and will help to shift long-
writings. into conversation with each other. standing biases that may still exist within
Careful forethought and intellectual The original version of “The Tree of our shared disciplinary consciousness.
labor guided the design of the current Architecture” suggested that building tra- Fraser anticipates potential criticism in
edition as a whole as well as its parts. Vol- ditions were anchored in an individual cul- his introduction, noting that postcolonial-
ume 1 contains Fraser’s introduction, ture’s geography, geology, climate, ism prepared the ground for the many
Gregg’s essay, a useful glossary, and other religion, social and political factors (“so- changes we see in this new edition, and that
necessary information in addition to the cial” in the second iteration), and history. this work stands at the limits of what is cur-
four parts covering the period from Architecture grew from the local soil, gen- rently possible. However, one might still
3500 BCE to 1500 CE. Volume 2 takes erated through the interactions of various ask why the architectural production of
the reader from 1500 CE to the present natural and human forces. Obviously, stu- France and that of the entire continent of
day in three parts. Each part is preceded dents of history need to understand such Africa during a particular period both qual-
by a short introduction based on a theme; context, and each of this edition’s chapters ify for a single chapter. Surely there should
these themes are, respectively, intention- draws upon yet also transforms this tradi- be more than one chapter on various Afri-
ality, internationality, ideology, exchange, tion by beginning with two sections, “His- can nations or regions? Such shortcomings