CH 1 Lecture Two

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 29

Visual perception

GESTALT THEORY OF VISUAL PSYCHOLOGY.


Fundamentals Of Composition

perception - the way our eyes and brains


 visual
make sense of what we see
 Good design thinking requires an
understanding of how the relationship between
visual elements affects the way we perceive
them, as well as an understanding of how to
control and exploit them.
Fundamentals Of Composition
Visual unity
 the whole must
predominate over the
parts
 you must first see the
whole pattern before
you notice the
individual elements
Fundamentals Of Composition
Intellectual unity vs. Visual unity

 Intellectual unity - idea generated and


word dominated.
 The mind, not the eye, makes the
grouping.
 Visual unity - placement of design
elements perceptible to the eye.
 In the most successful designs, these
reinforce one another.
Fundamentals Of Composition

 viewer is looking for some sort of


organization, something to relate the
various elements
 The designer must provide some
clues, but the viewer is already
attempting to find some coherent
pattern and unity.
 Gestalt theory of visual psychology:
perception studies
GESTALT
 A unified configuration or
 pattern of visual elements whose
properties cannot be derived
from a simple summation of its
parts.
GESTALT

 The early Gestalt psychologists and


many other researchers into visual
perception have discovered that
the eye seeks a unified whole, or
gestalt.
GOOD
GESTALT
The whole and the parts
 the whole is more than the sum
of its parts.
 This whole cannot be
perceived by a simple addition
of isolated parts.
 Each part is influenced by
those around it.
GOOD
GESTALT
WHOLE
 As you read these words, you perceive
the whole word, not the individual
letterforms that make it up.
 You can still pause and examine each
letter individually, but the word is more
than the sum of its separate letterforms
GESTALT PRINCIPLES

 Knowing how the eye seeks a gestalt can help


you analyze and create successful designs.
FIGURE/GROUND
PROXIMITY
SIMILARITY
CONTINUITY
CLOSURE
FIGURE / GROUND
(Form and Space)
 Theeye and mind separate an object (figure)
from its surroundings (ground).
FIGURE / GROUND
(Form and Space)
Categories
 The three main categories in figure/ground
shaping are stable, reversible, and ambiguous.
Stable
Figure/Ground
 Each two-dimensional
mark or shape is
perceived in an
unchanging, stable
relationship of object
against background.
Reversible Figure/Ground

 Figureand ground can


be focused on equally
when positive and
negative elements attract
our attention equally.
 What was initially
background becomes
foreground.
Ambiguous Figure/Ground

 In some puzzle
pictures, one figure
may turn out to be
made up of another
figure, or of several
different figures
PROXIMITY

 The degree of
closeness in the
placement of
elements.
 grouping by
similarity in spatial
location
Proximity in Composition

simply putting the elements


close together.
Proximity

Proximity grouping is Similarity, continuation, and reversible


grouping by similarity in figure/ground all unite this strong design.
spatial location.
SIMILARITY
 occurs when we see
similar shape, size,
color, spatial location
(proximity), angle, or
value.
SIMILARITY
CONTINUATION

 means that something


“continues” — usually a line,
an edge, or a direction from
one form to another.
 viewer’s eye is carried
smoothly from one element to
the next.
 The viewer’s eye will follow
along a line or curve.
CONTINUATION
CONTINUATION
CONTINUATION
CLOSURE

 A closed contour tends to be seen as an object.


 When the eye completes (closes) a line or curve
in order to form a familiar shape
CLOSURE

 active conceptual participation by the viewer to achieve an


intellectual closure with the O shape and a womb.
CLOSURE

recognize the link between


a musical note and a heart.

 This elegantly constructed symbol for 1 + 1


Design uses a rich combination of similarity,
reversible figure/ground, and closure.
Summary

 Ourperception of an object is influenced


by the arrangement of objects around it.
 Reality
could be seen as dependent on
context rather than as absolute.
END

??????????????

You might also like