EMI Teachers Evaluation Form (CLIL) - Final - Potrait

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Assumption College Rayong

EMI Teacher’s Evaluation Form


A.Y. 2024
Teacher's Name: ……………………………………… Class level: ……………………
Date of Supervision: …………………………………. Subject/Topic:
…………………………………..

Rating (1-
Category Criteria Indicators
5)
1.1 Clear Use simple language that students can
language easily understand.
1. Language
Give direct and clear instructions for
Use by 1.2 Instructions
classroom activities.
Teacher
Ask questions that make students think
1.3 Questions
and use more English.
Encourage students to speak and
2.1 Participation
2. Language participate in English during lessons.
Use by Help students use and understand
Students 2.2 Vocabulary keywords related to the subjects being
taught.
Highlight materials that support both
3.1 CLIL language and content learning, such as
3. Classroom materials diagrams with English labels or bilingual
Environment glossaries.
3.2 Encourage Always encourage speaking English,
English use even if students find it difficult.
4.1 Clear Goals
Define clear goals and objectives that
and CLIL
integrate both language and content.
Objectives
Use effective learning materials and
4. Lesson 4.2 Right
visual aids to teach both the subject and
Planning and Materials and
English. Include real objects to make
Teaching Visual Aids
lessons interactive.
Integrate at least one of the 7 Habits in
4.3 Integration
the lesson to help students apply what
of 7 Habits
they learn to everyday life.
5.1 Activity Keep lessons organized and moving
Organization smoothly.
5.2 Support All
Ensure all students feel included and
Students and
supported, and encourage them to use
5. Classroom Encouraging
English.
Management Talk
and 5.3 Regular Use small tests to check both subject
Assessment Tests knowledge and English skills.
Give feedback that helps students
5.4 Feedback improve their English and understanding
of the subject.
5.5 Lesson Include a brief review to ensure
Review and objectives are met and goals are
Conclusion concluded effectively.
Total Score

Total Average Score (Total score/75x100)

Summary Evaluation
I. Areas of Excellence
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
2. Areas for Development
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
3. Overall Comment
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
4. Recommendations
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………

Scoring Guide Grade Performance


Description
5 = Excellent Equivalent Level
4 = Good 90 -100% Excellent Outstanding understanding
3 = Average 80-89% Very Good Strong with minor errors
2 = Below Average 70-79% Good Meets expectation
1 = Needs
60-69% Satisfactory Adequate, some issues
Improvement
Needs
50-59% Improvement Below average
Below 50% Poor Limited understanding

Supervised by:
_____________________________ _______________________________
Ms. Pattama Angkaprasartchai Ms. Niorn
Sangsukha
Primary Science Dept. Head Primary
Department. Head
________________________
Ms. Ruth K. Magisan
EMI Facilitator

(Teacher’s Name)
Signature

You might also like